背景:临床前研究表明,功能性抑制酸性鞘磷脂酶(FIASMA)的药物可能会增强免疫细胞的寿命,并可能提供针对感染的保护。许多抗抑郁药已显示出FIASMA活性。
方法:我们使用英国临床实践研究数据链(2000-2021)的初级保健数据进行了一项队列研究。我们评估了新使用氟西汀的复合诊断急性感染的相关性,舍曲林,帕罗西汀,与西酞普兰相比,文拉法辛年龄为18-80岁。我们在二次分析中比较了各组之间的SARS-CoV-2感染。我们使用负二项回归在四个成对比较中估计了急性感染的发生率(IR)和IR比率(IRR)。我们对混杂因素进行了倾向评分(PS)精细分层控制。
结果:在PS加权队列中,我们包括了353,138名氟西汀,222,463舍曲林,69,963帕罗西汀,32,608文拉法辛,515996至516583个新西酞普兰用户。PS加权IR介于76.8急性感染/1000人年(py)(舍曲林)和98.9感染/1000py(西酞普兰)之间。我们观察到帕罗西汀的PS加权内部收益率约为1(0.97,95%CI,0.95-1.00),氟西汀(0.94,95%CI,0.92-0.95),文拉法辛(0.90,95%CI,0.87-0.94)与西酞普兰。舍曲林与西酞普兰的IRR降低(0.84,95%CI,0.82-0.85),在队列输入日期的子组内变为null。在SARS-CoV-2感染的分析中,没有观察到统计学相关的风险降低.
结论:分析不仅限于诊断为抑郁症的患者,可能低估感染发生率,西酞普兰的FIASMA活性不明确。
结论:氟西汀,舍曲林,帕罗西汀,与可能较弱的FIASMA西酞普兰相比,文拉法辛与急性感染风险降低无关。
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies suggested that drugs that functionally inhibit acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMA)may enhance immune cell longevity and potentially offer protection against infections. Many antidepressants have shown FIASMA activity.
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using primary-care data from the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2000-2021). We assessed the association of composite diagnosed acute infections in new users of fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, or venlafaxine aged 18-80 years compared to citalopram. We compared SARS-CoV-2 infections between groups in a secondary analysis. We estimated incidence rates (IR) and IR ratios (IRR) of acute infections in four pairwise comparisons using negative binomial regression. We applied propensity score (PS) fine stratification to control for confounding.
RESULTS: In the PS-weighted cohorts, we included 353,138 fluoxetine, 222,463 sertraline, 69,963 paroxetine, 32,608 venlafaxine, and between 515,996 and 516,583 new citalopram users. PS-weighted IRs ranged between 76.8 acute infections /1000 person-years (py) (sertraline) and 98.9 infections/1000 py (citalopram). We observed PS-weighted IRRs around unity for paroxetine (0.97, 95 % CI, 0.95-1.00), fluoxetine (0.94, 95 % CI, 0.92-0.95), and venlafaxine (0.90, 95 % CI, 0.87-0.94) vs citalopram. Reduced IRR for sertraline vs citalopram (0.84, 95 % CI, 0.82-0.85), became null within subgroups by cohort entry date. In the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, no statistically relevant risk reduction was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis not limited to patients with diagnosed depression, possible underestimation of infection incidence, and unclear FIASMA activity of citalopram.
CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine, sertraline, paroxetine, and venlafaxine were not associated with a reduced risk of acute infection when compared with the presumably weak FIASMA citalopram.