OBJECTIVE: Given Iran\'s recent shift towards pronatalist population policies, concerns have arisen regarding the potential increase in abortion rates. This review study examines the trends of (medical), intentional (illegal), and spontaneous abortions in Iran over the past two decades, as well as the factors that have contributed to these trends.
METHODS: This paper reviewed research articles published between 2005 and 2022 on abortion in Iran. The study employed the PRISMA checklist for systematic reviews. Articles were searched from international (Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science) and national databases (Magiran, Medlib, SID). Once the eligibility criteria were applied, 42 records were included from the initial 349 records.
RESULTS: Abortion is influenced by a variety of socioeconomic and cultural factors and the availability of family planning services. Factors that contribute to unintended pregnancy include attitudes toward abortion, knowledge about reproductive health, access to reproductive health services, and fertility desires, among others. In addition to health and medical factors, consanguineous marriage plays an important role in spontaneous and therapeutic abortion. A higher number of illegal abortions were reported by women from more privileged socioeconomic classes. In comparison, a higher number of medical and spontaneous abortions were reported by women from less privileged socioeconomic classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Iranian policymakers are concerned about the declining fertility rate and have turned to pronatalist policies. From a demographic standpoint, this seems to be a reasonable approach. However, the new population policies, particularly, the Family Protection and Young Population Law, along with creating limitations in access to reproductive health services and prenatal screening tests as well as stricter abortion law could potentially lead to an increase in various types of abortions and their associated consequences.

In the changing legal environment of obstetric care in the USA, with laws in many states banning termination at all stages of pregnancy with narrow exemptions, healthcare providers are encountering cases in which risk to maternal safety is increased. This report presents a case of a 28-year-old primigravida with an anencephalic fetus who was legally unable to pursue termination in her home state. She traveled to another state in order to pursue safe and legal abortion of a non-viable fetus. Due to an unrecognized cornual ectopic gestation, the delivery resulted in uterine rupture, the need for hysterectomy, and significant morbidity in a patient with a strong desire for future fertility.

Self-managed abortion has been particularly prominent in recent discussions of abortion, with the rise of telemedicine abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic and the reality of self-managed illegal abortion in pro-life states following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. There has likewise been much political concern about misinformation and fake news circulated in the media. This article highlights how misinformation and poor quality studies have been used to make implausible claims regarding the safety of telemedicine and the number of deaths from unsafe abortion where abortion is illegal. This puts women\'s health and lives at risk by authorizing unsafe medical practice and poorly evidenced policy decisions regarding abortion and emergency obstetric care.

暂无摘要。

Self-managed medical abortions are generally safe; however, pharmacy provision of abortion pills is against the Ghanaian abortion law. Nevertheless, evidence shows increasing numbers of women use it. An understanding of the influence of the law on pharmacies dispensing abortifacients and women who needed hospital care after using these pills is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap.
We conducted 26 interviews with eight pharmacy workers and 18 women who sought hospital care after using abortion pills. Study participants were recruited from private pharmacies and hospitals within the Ashanti Region of Ghana between June 2017 and March 2018. We employed phenomenology in analysing the data.
Results show that criminalising medical abortion care from pharmacies does not stop abortions but rather drives it to be provided without oversight. It also denied pharmacy workers formal training in medical abortion care, resulting in situations where they failed to provide correct dosage information, used their discretion in determining the price of abortifacients and to whom they would dispense the pills. For women, it contributed to limited interaction with providers and an inability to insist on their rights even in instances where the pills were sold at exorbitant prices.
Due to the increasing numbers of Ghanaian women using medical abortion pills from pharmacies, although it is illegal, the ideal would be for medical abortion pills to be made legally available through pharmacies. Given that this may not occur in the short term, an immediate solution would be to upskill pharmacy workers.

To examine the numbers and characteristics of women and pregnant people in Malta seeking at-home medical abortion using online telemedicine from 2017 to 2021.
Population-based study.
Republic of Malta PARTICIPANTS: Between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021, 1090 women and pregnant people requested at-home medical abortion through one online telemedicine provider (Women on Web). Mifepristone and misoprostol were shipped to 658 women (60.4% of requests).
The numbers and demographics of persons to which abortion pills were shipped, their reasons for accessing abortion, and reasons for requesting medical abortion via telemedicine between January 2017 and December 2021 were analysed. Selected data were compared across different groups.
The number of people in Malta to whom medical abortion pills were shipped increased significantly in the 5 years analysed. Women and pregnant people requesting medical abortion were diverse with respect to age, pregnancy circumstances and reasons for seeking an abortion. More than half had existing children and over 90% reached out to Women on Web at <7 weeks. Among those completing a medical abortion, 63% did not use contraception, and in 30% there was contraception failure. The most common reasons for ordering medical abortion pills online were difficulty accessing abortion because of legal restrictions (73%) and abortion pills not being available (45%) in the country.
Despite a complete ban on abortion, the number of women and pregnant people residing in Malta completing at-home medical abortions is considerable and has been steadily increasing.

We argue that, in certain circumstances, doctors might be professionally justified to provide abortions even in those jurisdictions where abortion is illegal. That it is at least professionally permissible does not mean that they have an all-things-considered ethical justification or obligation to provide illegal abortions or that professional obligations or professional permissibility trump legal obligations. It rather means that professional organisations should respect and indeed protect doctors\' positive claims of conscience to provide abortions if they plausibly track what is in the best medical interests of their patients. It is the responsibility of state authorities to enforce the law, but it is the responsibility of professional organisations to uphold the highest standards of medical ethics, even when they conflict with the law. Whatever the legal sanctions in place, healthcare professionals should not be sanctioned by the professional bodies for providing abortions according to professional standards, even if illegally. Indeed, professional organisation should lobby to offer protection to such professionals. Our arguments have practical implications for what healthcare professionals and healthcare professional organisations may or should do in those jurisdictions that legally prohibit abortion, such as some US States after the reversal of Roe v Wade.

BACKGROUND: Unsafe abortion remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity, especially in developing countries with restrictive abortion laws. Disease containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced access to contraception and safe abortion care, potentially increasing rates of unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morbidity and mortality burden of unsafe abortion before the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: A six-year analytical retrospective study of unsafe abortion at the Federal Medical Centre, Lokoja, Nigeria. All case records of unsafe abortion managed within the study period were retrieved, and relevant data extracted using a purpose-designed proforma. Data obtained was analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Associations between categorical independent and outcome variables were assessed using the Chi square test at 95% confidence level. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The prevalence of unsafe abortion was 8.6 per 1,000 deliveries. More than one-half (37, 52.9%) were medical abortions using misoprostol tablets. The mean age of the women was 23.15+ 3.96 years, and most of them were single (49, 70%), with primary/ secondary education (42, 60%), and of low socioeconomic status (67, 95.7%). Nearly one-half (33, 47.1%) had either never used any modern contraceptive (9, 12.9%) or only used emergency contraception (24, 34.3%). The predominant complications of unsafe abortion included retained product of conception (69, 98.6%), haemorrhagic shock (22,31.4%), and sepsis (19, 27.1%). There were two maternal deaths, giving a case fatality rate of 2.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Unsafe abortion remains a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in our setting. Improving access to effective modern contraceptives and liberalizing our abortion laws may reduce maternal morbidity and mortality from unsafe abortion.
BACKGROUND: L’avortement à risque reste l’une des principales causes de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles, en particulier dans les pays en développement où les lois sur l’avortement sont restrictives. Les mesures de confinement de la maladie pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 ont réduit l’accès à la contraception et aux soins d’avortement sûrs, augmentant potentiellement les taux de grossesses non désirées et d’avortements à risque.
OBJECTIVE: Évaluer le fardeau de morbidité et de mortalité de l’avortement à risque avant la pandémie de COVID-19.
METHODS: Une étude rétrospective analytique de six ans sur l’avortement à risque au Fédéral Médical Center, Lokoja, Nigeria. Tous les dossiers de tous les cas d’avortement à risque pris en charge au cours de la période d’étude ont été récupérés et les données pertinentes extraites à l’aide d’un formulaire conçu à cet effet. Les données obtenues ont été analysées à l’aide d’IBM SPSS Statistiques pour Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Les associations entre les variables indépendantes catégorielles et les variables de résultat ont été évaluées à l’aide du test du chi carré à un niveau de confiance de 95 %. Une valeur de p <0,05 était considérée comme statistiquement significative.
RESULTS: L’prévalence des avortements à risque était de 8,6 pour 1000 accouchements. Plus de la moitié (37, 52,9%) étaient des avortements médicamenteux utilisant comprimés de misoprostol. L’âge moyen des femmes était de 23,15+ 3,96 ans, et la plupart d’entre elles étaient célibataires (49, 70%), avec une éducation primaire/secondaire (42, 60%) et de statut socio-économique bas (67, 95,7%). Près de la moitié (33, 47,1%) n’avaient jamais utilisé de contraceptif moderne (9,12,9%) ou n’avaient utilisé qu’une contraception d’urgence (24, 34,3%). Les complications prédominantes comprenaient la rétention du produit de conception (69, 98,6 %), le choc hémorragique (22, 31,4 %) et la septicémie (19, 27,1 %). Il y a eu deux décès maternels, soit un taux de létalité de 2,9 %.
CONCLUSIONS: L’avortement à risque reste une cause importante de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles dans notre contexte. L’amélioration de l’accès à des contraceptifs modernes efficaces et la libéralisation de nos lois sur l’avortement réduiront la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles dues à l’avortement à risque.
UNASSIGNED: Planification familiale, Avortement illégal/criminel, morbidité et mortalité maternelles, Produit de la conception retenu, Besoin non satisfait.

We examined people\'s (1) attitudes about abortion using an item from Pew Research Center (i.e., whether abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases, or illegal in all cases) and (2) support for different punishments if abortion were illegal in all cases for different people involved in the abortion-the pregnant person, their partner, an informant and the healthcare provider.
We administered a web-based survey to 2,204 U.S. adults using quota-based sampling. Post-stratification weights were applied to the data so that the sample was comparable to U.S. benchmarks for gender, race, Hispanic ethnicity, age, education, and political affiliation. We compared endorsement of various punishments for a pregnant person, their partner, informant, and healthcare provider. Additionally, we compared the endorsement of these punishments across response options of Pew\'s abortion legality item.
Overall, most of our sample indicated that abortion should be legal in most (34%) or legal in all scenarios (21%). However, if abortion were illegal in all circumstances, most of our sample supported some form of punishment for the pregnant person (72%-75%), their partner (65%-68%), and healthcare providers (70%-71%), but not informants (47%-49%). Among the endorsed punishments, therapy/education typically received the most support.
Because of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women\'s Health Organization decision and the subsequent overturning of Roe v. Wade, abortion is illegal in a significant number of states and a punishable offense. Our findings suggest that current punishments associated with many of these laws are counter to public sentiment.
Despite majority support for some punishment, the categories of \"no punishment\" or therapy/education had the most support. Given the lack of plurality or majority support for fines or incarceration, abortion laws including these punishments, including bounty-style laws passed in Texas and Oklahoma, may be out of step with public opinion.

This Viewpoint discusses passage and implementation of Law 27.610, which legalized abortion in Argentina under certain circumstances, and examines the ongoing clinical issues and legal challenges to the law.