ALD, alcoholic liver disease

ALD,酒精性肝病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝硬化的自然史通常是在从代偿性肝硬化发展到随后的代偿失调阶段的背景下概念化的。虽然这种单向概念是最常见的病理生理轨迹,对接受再补偿的患者亚组有了新的认识.虽然主要基于移植候补名单登记处的文献表明,对于这种经历疾病消退的人群,关于这个实体的整体文献仍然不明确。已尝试就定义补偿达成共识,这具有其自身的细微差别和局限性。我们总结了有关肝硬化中这种新兴但有争议的再补偿概念的现有文献,并深入研究了对现实生活实践的未来影响和影响。
    The natural history of cirrhosis has usually been conceptualized in the context of progression from compensated cirrhosis to subsequent stages of decompensation. While this unidirectional concept is the most common pathophysiological trajectory, there has been an emerging understanding of a subgroup of patients which undergo recompensation. While literature mostly based on transplant waitlist registries have indicated towards such a population who experience disease regression, the overall literature about this entity remains inexplicit. An effort to generate consensus on defining recompensation has been attempted which comes with its own nuances and limitations. We summarize the available literature on this emerging yet controversial concept of recompensation in cirrhosis and delve into future implications and impact on real-life practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近开发了NAFLD失代偿风险评分(Iowa模型),用于识别非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者发生肝脏事件的风险最高,使用三个变量-年龄,血小板计数,和糖尿病。
    我们对爱荷华州模型进行了外部验证,并将其与现有的非侵入性模型进行了比较。
    我们纳入了波士顿医疗中心的249名NAFLD患者,波士顿,马萨诸塞州,外部验证队列中的949例患者和内部/外部联合验证队列中的949例患者。主要结果是肝脏事件的发展(腹水,肝性脑病,食管或胃静脉曲张,或肝细胞癌)。我们使用Cox比例风险来分析Iowa模型在外部验证(https://uihc.org/非酒精性脂肪肝疾病失代偿风险评分计算器)中预测肝脏事件的能力。我们将爱荷华州模型的性能与AST与血小板比率指数(APRI)进行了比较,NAFLD纤维化评分(NFS),和合并队列中的FIB-4指数。
    Iowa模型显著预测了肝脏事件的发展,风险比为2.5[95%置信区间(CI)1.7-3.9,P<0.001],受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.87(CI0.83-0.91)。爱荷华州模型的AUROC(0.88,CI:0.85-0.92)与FIB-4指数(0.87,CI:0.83-0.91)相当,高于NFS(0.66,CI:0.63-0.69)和APRI(0.76,CI:0.73-0.79)。
    在城市,种族和种族不同的人口,Iowa模型在确定肝脏相关并发症风险较高的NAFLD患者方面表现良好.该模型提供发生肝脏事件的个体概率,并识别需要早期干预的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The NAFLD decompensation risk score (the Iowa Model) was recently developed to identify patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) at highest risk of developing hepatic events using three variables-age, platelet count, and diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an external validation of the Iowa Model and compared it to existing non-invasive models.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 249 patients with NAFLD at Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, in the external validation cohort and 949 patients in the combined internal/external validation cohort. The primary outcome was the development of hepatic events (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, esophageal or gastric varices, or hepatocellular carcinoma). We used Cox proportional hazards to analyze the ability of the Iowa Model to predict hepatic events in the external validation (https://uihc.org/non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-decompensation-risk-score-calculator). We compared the performance of the Iowa Model to the AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), and the FIB-4 index in the combined cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: The Iowa Model significantly predicted the development of hepatic events with hazard ratio of 2.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.9, P < 0.001] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.87 (CI 0.83-0.91). The AUROC of the Iowa Model (0.88, CI: 0.85-0.92) was comparable to the FIB-4 index (0.87, CI: 0.83-0.91) and higher than NFS (0.66, CI: 0.63-0.69) and APRI (0.76, CI: 0.73-0.79).
    UNASSIGNED: In an urban, racially and ethnically diverse population, the Iowa Model performed well to identify NAFLD patients at higher risk for liver-related complications. The model provides the individual probability of developing hepatic events and identifies patients in need of early intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:细菌感染会影响肝硬化患者的生存率。由于多药耐药生物的流行,医院获得性细菌感染带来了日益严重的医疗保健问题。本研究旨在调查感染预防和控制计划和COVID-19措施对医院获得性感染发生率和一系列次要结局的影响,包括多重耐药生物的流行,经验性抗生素治疗失败和肝硬化患者脓毒症状态的发展。
    UASSIGNED:感染预防和控制计划是一项基于抗菌药物管理和减少患者暴露于危险因素的复杂策略。COVID-19措施提出了医院和卫生部意大利卫生系统建议实施的进一步行为和卫生限制。我们进行了一项回顾性和前瞻性联合研究,比较了额外措施与医院标准的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:我们分析了941例患者的数据。感染预防和控制程序与医院获得性感染发生率的降低相关(17%vs.8.9%,p<0.01)。在实施COVID-19措施后,没有进一步减少。即使控制了混杂变量的影响,感染预防和控制程序的影响仍然显着(OR0.44,95%CI0.26-0.73,p=0.002)。此外,该计划的采用降低了多药耐药菌的患病率,并降低了经验性抗生素治疗失败和败血症状态的发生率.
    UASSIGNED:感染预防和控制计划将医院获得性感染的发生率降低了近50%。此外,该计划还降低了大多数次要结局的患病率.根据这项研究的结果,我们鼓励其他肝脏中心采用感染预防和控制计划。
    未经证实:感染是肝硬化患者的威胁生命的问题。此外,由于多重耐药细菌的高流行,医院获得性感染更加令人担忧.这项研究分析了来自三个不同时期的住院肝硬化患者的大量队列。与第一个相比,在第二阶段实施了感染预防计划,减少医院获得性感染的数量,并含有多重耐药细菌。在第三阶段,我们实施了更严格的措施,以最大限度地减少COVID-19疫情的影响。然而,这些措施并未导致医院获得性感染的进一步减少.
    UNASSIGNED: Bacterial infections affect survival of patients with cirrhosis. Hospital-acquired bacterial infections present a growing healthcare problem because of the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms. This study aimed to investigate the impact of an infection prevention and control programme and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) measures on the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and a set of secondary outcomes, including the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms, empiric antibiotic treatment failure, and development of septic states in patients with cirrhosis.
    UNASSIGNED: The infection prevention and control programme was a complex strategy based on antimicrobial stewardship and the reduction of patient\'s exposure to risk factors. The COVID-19 measures presented further behavioural and hygiene restrictions imposed by the Hospital and Health Italian Sanitary System recommendations. We performed a combined retrospective and prospective study in which we compared the impact of extra measures against the hospital standard.
    UNASSIGNED: We analysed data from 941 patients. The infection prevention and control programme was associated with a reduction in the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (17 vs. 8.9%, p <0.01). No further reduction was present after the COVID-19 measures had been imposed. The impact of the infection prevention and control programme remained significant even after controlling for the effects of confounding variables (odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the adoption of the programme reduced the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and decreased rates of empiric antibiotic treatment failure and the development of septic states.
    UNASSIGNED: The infection prevention and control programme decreased the incidence of hospital-acquired infections by nearly 50%. Furthermore, the programme also reduced the prevalence of most of the secondary outcomes. Based on the results of this study, we encourage other liver centres to adopt infection prevention and control programmes.
    UNASSIGNED: Infections are a life-threatening problem for patients with liver cirrhosis. Moreover, hospital-acquired infections are even more alarming owing to the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. This study analysed a large cohort of hospitalised patients with cirrhosis from three different periods. Unlike in the first period, an infection prevention programme was applied in the second period, reducing the number of hospital-acquired infections and containing multidrug-resistant bacteria. In the third period, we imposed even more stringent measures to minimise the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak. However, these measures did not result in a further reduction in hospital-acquired infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)是计算机中介设计算法以支持人类智能的数学过程。AI在肝病学中显示出巨大的希望,可以计划适当的管理,从而改善治疗结果。AI领域处于非常早期的阶段,临床应用有限。人工智能工具,如机器学习,深度学习,和“大数据”处于一个连续的进化阶段,目前正在应用于临床和基础研究。在这次审查中,我们总结了各种人工智能在肝病学中的应用,陷阱和人工智能的未来影响。不同的人工智能模型和算法正在研究中,使用临床,实验室,内镜和成像参数,以诊断和管理肝脏疾病和肿块病变。AI有助于减少人为错误并改善治疗方案。未来AI在肝病中的使用需要进一步的研究和验证。
    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a mathematical process of computer mediating designing of algorithms to support human intelligence. AI in hepatology has shown tremendous promise to plan appropriate management and hence improve treatment outcomes. The field of AI is in a very early phase with limited clinical use. AI tools such as machine learning, deep learning, and \'big data\' are in a continuous phase of evolution, presently being applied for clinical and basic research. In this review, we have summarized various AI applications in hepatology, the pitfalls and AI\'s future implications. Different AI models and algorithms are under study using clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and imaging parameters to diagnose and manage liver diseases and mass lesions. AI has helped to reduce human errors and improve treatment protocols. Further research and validation are required for future use of AI in hepatology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精戒断综合征(AWS)是一种常见病,见于酒精使用障碍(AUD)和酒精性肝病(ALD)的寻求治疗的患者。AWS,通常在最后一次使用酒精的4-6小时内开始,可以从轻微的症状,如失眠,震颤,和自主神经多动,更严重的症状,如癫痫发作和震颤谵妄。临床研究所戒断评估量表-酒精修订(CIWA-Ar)是临床实践中评估AWS最常用的量表。超过8分的中度戒断的存在是药物治疗的指征。劳拉西泮和奥沙西泮是ALD环境中AWS管理的首选药物。在严重的ALD中,由于存在过度镇静或诱发肝性脑病的风险,因此在监测时应谨慎使用苯二氮卓类药物。
    Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) is a common condition that is seen in treatment-seeking patients with Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). AWS, which typically starts within 4-6 h of the last alcohol use, can range from mild symptoms such as insomnia, tremors, and autonomic hyperactivity to more severe symptoms such as seizures and delirium tremens. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment Scale-Alcohol Revised (CIWA-Ar) is the most commonly used scale to assess AWS in clinical practice. The presence of moderate withdrawal as indicated by a score of more than 8 is an indication for pharmacotherapy. Lorazepam and oxazepam are preferred agents for the management of AWS in the setting of ALD. In severe ALD, benzodiazepines should be used cautiously with monitoring due to the risk of excessive sedation or precipitating hepatic encephalopathy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒精使用障碍(AUD)是在大量饮酒的背景下发展的常见病症,其特征是对酒精使用失去控制和强制使用酒精,通常尽管有负面后果。AUD是治疗后酒精性肝病(ALD)患者恢复饮酒的主要原因。因此,必须筛查所有ALD患者是否存在AUD。使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)和AUDIT-C等筛查工具,随后使用DSM-5标准确定AUD的诊断和严重程度。ALD患者的AUD管理最好使用包括精神科医生和胃肠病学家/肝病学家的综合方法进行。治疗通常涉及药物治疗和社会心理干预的组合,试图实现和保持禁欲。虽然,证据有限,巴氯芬是长期治疗ALD患者AUD的一线药物。强化心理干预,如动机增强疗法和认知行为疗法也被认为是有益的。治疗保留和随访至关重要,可以积极影响结果。
    Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a common condition that develops on the background of heavy alcohol use and is characterised by the loss of control over alcohol use and a compulsion to use alcohol, often despite negative consequences. AUD is a leading cause for the resumption of alcohol use in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) after treatment. Hence it is essential to screen all patients with ALD for the presence of AUD. Screening tools such as alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) and AUDIT-C are used, following which the diagnosis and severity of AUD are determined using DSM-5 criteria. The management of AUD in patients with ALD is best carried out using an integrated approach involving psychiatrists and gastroenterologists/hepatologists. The treatment most often involves a combination of pharmacotherapy and psychosocial interventions which try to achieve and maintain abstinence. Although, there is limited evidence, Baclofen is the first line pharmacological agent for long-term management of AUD in patients with ALD. Intensive psychological interventions such as motivation enhancement therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy are also seen to be beneficial. Treatment retention and follow-up are vital and can positively influence outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肠屏障功能障碍在非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)和酒精性肝病(ALD)的发病机制中得到了广泛认可。然而,两种病因之间的这种功能障碍成分的比较仍有待研究,尤其是在NAFLD的早期阶段.
    肠道屏障功能障碍的组成部分,如尿液中乳果糖甘露醇比率(LMR)引起的肠道通透性(IP)改变,全身性内毒素血症(IgG和IgM抗内毒素抗体),全身炎症(血清肿瘤坏死因子α[TNF-α]和白细胞介素-1[IL-1]水平),在无肝硬化的NAFLD患者(n=34)中,使用OxfordNanoporeMinION装置前瞻性评估十二指肠活检和粪便微生物组成中的紧密连接(TJ)蛋白表达,ALD(n=28),并与无疾病对照(n=20)进行比较。
    ALD患者的病情比NAFLD患者更严重(中位肝硬度-NAFLD:7.1kPa[5.9-8.9]vs.ALD:14.3kPa[9.6-24],P<0.001]。与对照组相比,NAFLD和ALD组的LMR中位数明显更高(NAFLD0.054[0.037-0.17]vs.控制0.027[0.021-0.045](P=0.001)和ALD0.043[0.03-0.068]vs.控制0.027[0.021-0.045](P=0.019)]。与ALD120.6[20.1-728]相比,NAFLD中的抗内毒素抗体滴度(IgM)(MMU/mL)最低(P=0.042)和对照155.3[23.8-442.9])(P=0.021)。与对照组(16.1[10.8-33.3])(P<0.001)和ALD(12.3[10.1-42.7])相比,NAFLD患者的中位TNF-α(pg/mL)水平升高(53.3[24.5-115])(P<0.001)。NAFLD十二指肠粘膜中zonulin-1和claudin-3的表达最低。在主要协调分析(PCoA)上,三组的全球细菌组成显著不同(PERMANOVA检验,P<0.001)。
    虽然在两种病因中均保持激活,与ALD相比,早期NAFLD的肠屏障功能障碍异常更为明显,尽管后者的疾病更为晚期。
    UNASSIGNED: Gut-barrier dysfunction is well recognized in pathogenesis of both non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). However, comparison of components of this dysfunction between the two etiologies remains unexplored especially in early stages of NAFLD.
    UNASSIGNED: Components of gut-barrier dysfunction like alterations in intestinal permeability (IP) by lactulose mannitol ratio (LMR) in urine, systemic endotoxemia (IgG and IgM anti-endotoxin antibodies), systemic inflammation (serum tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α] and interleukin-1 [IL-1] levels), tight junction (TJ) proteins expression in duodenal biopsy and stool microbiota composition using Oxford Nanopore MinION device were prospectively evaluated in patients with NAFLD (n = 34) with no cirrhosis, ALD (n = 28) and were compared with disease free controls (n = 20).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with ALD had more advanced disease than those with NAFLD (median liver stiffness -NAFLD:7.1 kPa [5.9-8.9] vs. ALD:14.3 kPa [9.6-24], P < 0.001]. Median LMR was significantly higher in NAFLD and ALD group when compared to controls (NAFLD 0.054 [0.037-0.17] vs. controls 0.027 [0.021-0.045] (P = 0.001)) and ALD 0.043 [0.03-0.068] vs. controls 0.027 [0.021-0.045] (P = 0.019)]. Anti-endotoxin antibody titer (IgM) (MMU/mL) was lowest in NAFLD 72.9 [3.2-1089.5] compared to ALD 120.6 [20.1-728]) (P = 0.042) and controls 155.3 [23.8-442.9]) (P = 0.021). Median TNF-α (pg/mL) levels were elevated in patients with NAFLD (53.3 [24.5-115]) compared to controls (16.1 [10.8-33.3]) (P < 0.001) and ALD (12.3 [10.1-42.7]) (P < 0.001). Expression of zonulin-1 and claudin-3 in duodenal mucosa was lowest in NAFLD. On principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA), the global bacterial composition was significantly different across the three groups (PERMANOVA test, P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: While remaining activated in both etiologies, gut-barrier dysfunction abnormalities were more pronounced in NAFLD at early stages compared to ALD despite more advanced disease in the latter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    勃起功能障碍(ED)在代偿性肝硬化患者中很常见,但其对生活质量(QOL)的影响通常被忽视。这项研究旨在确定男性患者的ED频率代偿性慢性肝病(CLD),评估他们的生活质量和对他达拉非治疗的反应。次要目的是评估他达拉非治疗对肝纤维化的影响,如果有的话。
    使用国际勃起功能指数-5(IIEF-5)在基线时对代偿性CLD和晚期肝纤维化的连续患者进行筛查,QOL问卷(WHOQOL-BREF),使用Fibroscan™(Echosens,法国),和基于4个因素(FIB-4)评分的纤维化指数。符合资格标准的ED患者隔日服用PDE5抑制剂他达拉非20mg。在后续行动中,IIEF-5LSM,和FIB-4在3个月和6个月后进行监测,而WHOQOL-BREF问卷在基线和6个月时进行.
    在89例CLD和晚期肝纤维化患者中,43例(48%)出现ED,34例(38%)符合排除和纳入标准的患者服用他达拉非。随访3个月时,平均IIEF-5评分从15.57±4增加至20.78±3.6(P=0.0001),且在6个月时持续改善(IIEF-5评分21.87±2.2;P=0.12).物理,社会关系,WHOQOL-BREF问卷中的环境领域在六个月时显示出显着改善(P<0.05),而心理领域则没有改善(P=ns)。基线值为12.69±3.1kPa,平均LSM降至11.37±3.9kPa,使用他达拉非3个月后(P=0.02)。六个月后,LSM从11±0.9下降到8.2±3.2kPa(P=0.034)。FIB-4值显示在3个月时从基线下降,从1.52±0.58到1.32±0.55,P<0.05,6个月时,从1.25±0.53到0.97±0.36,P>0.05。CAP值未显示任何显著变化。SGOT和SGPT水平无明显下降(P>0.05),CTP或MELD评分无明显变化。
    在短期内,他达拉非改善CLD和晚期肝纤维化患者的ED和QOL。它还可以减少他们的肝纤维化。需要进一步的研究,包括肝组织学,以证实可能的抗纤维化作用的初步观察。
    UNASSIGNED: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is common in patients with compensated cirrhosis but its impact on the quality of life (QOL) is usually overlooked. This study aimed at determining the frequency of ED in male patients with compensated chronic liver disease (CLD), assessing their QOL and the response to treatment with tadalafil. A secondary aim was to assess the effect of the tadalafil therapy on liver fibrosis, if any.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients with compensated CLD and advanced liver fibrosis were screened at the baseline with the International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), QOL questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF), liver stiffness measurements (LSM) made with Fibroscan™ (Echosens, France), and fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) scores. Patients with ED meeting eligibility criteria were prescribed PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil 20 mg on alternate days. During the follow-up, IIEF-5, LSM, and FIB-4 were monitored after 3 and 6 months while the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was administered at the baseline and at 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 89 patients with CLD and advanced liver fibrosis, ED was present in 43 (48%) and tadalafil was prescribed to 34 patients (38%) meeting exclusion and inclusion criteria. At 3 months follow-up, the mean IIEF 5 score increased from 15.57 ± 4 to 20.78 ± 3.6, (P = 0.0001) and the improvement persisted at 6 months (IIEF-5 score 21.87 ± 2.2; P = 0.12). The physical, social relationships, and environment domains in the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire showed significant improvement at six months (P < 0.05) but not the psychological domain (P = ns). From a baseline value of 12.69 ± 3.1 kPa, the mean LSM decreased to 11.37 ± 3.9 kPa, (P = 0.02) after 3 months on tadalafil. After 6 months, the LSM further decreased from 11 ± 0.9 to 8.2 ± 3.2 kPa (P = 0.034). FIB-4 values showed a decline from the baseline at 3 months, from 1.52 ± 0.58 to 1.32 ± 0.55, P < 0.05 and at 6 months, from 1.25 ± 0.53 to 0.97 ± 0.36, P > 0.05. The CAP values did not show any significant change. There was an insignificant decline in the SGOT and SGPT levels (P > 0.05) with no significant change in CTP or MELD scores.
    UNASSIGNED: In the short term, tadalafil improves ED and QOL in patients with CLD and advanced liver fibrosis. It may also reduce liver fibrosis in them. Further studies that include liver histology are needed to confirm this preliminary observation of a possible antifibrotic effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is not considered a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, lifestyle characteristics commonly associated with increased ASCVD risk are highly prevalent in ESLD. Emerging literature shows a high burden of asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with ESLD and a high ASCVD risk in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. Coronary artery calcium score (CAC) is a noninvasive test providing reliable CAD risk stratification. We implemented an LT evaluation protocol with CAC playing a central role in triaging and determining the need for further CAD assessment. Here, we inform our results from this early experience.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with ESLD referred for LT evaluation were prospectively studied. We compared accuracy of CAC against that of CAD risk factors/scores, troponin I, dobutamine stress echocardiogram (DSE), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect coronary stenosis ≥70 (CAD ≥ 70) per left heart catheterization (LHC). Thirty-day post-LT cardiac outcomes were also analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred twenty-four of 148 (84%) patients underwent CAC, 106 (72%) DSE/SPECT, and 50 (34%) LHC. CAC ≥ 400 was found in 35 (28%), 100 to 399 in 17 (14%), and <100 in 72 (58%). LHC identified CAD ≥ 70% in 8 of 29 (28%), 2 of 9 (22%), and 0 of 4, respectively. Two acute coronary syndromes occurred after LT in a patient with CAC 811 (CAD < 70%), and one with CAC 347 (CAD ≥ 70%). No patients with CAC < 100 presented with acute coronary syndrome after LT. When using CAD ≥ 70% as primary endpoint of LT evaluation, CAC ≥ 346 was the only test showing predictive usefulness (negative predictive value 100%).
    UNASSIGNED: CAC is a promising tool to guide CAD risk stratification and need for LHC during LT evaluation. Patients with a CAC < 100 can safely undergo LT without the need for LHC or cardiac stress testing, whereas a CAC < 346 accurately rules out significant CAD stenosis (≥70%) on LHC, outperforming other CAD risk-stratification strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估标准化的移植前戒酒和治疗指南对肝移植结果的影响。
    方法:这项研究评估了移植后复发和生存与移植前指南要求戒酒相关,成瘾治疗,和匿名戒酒(AA)出席。这项回顾性队列研究包括2000年1月1日至2012年12月31日之间在中西部移植中心移植的酒精诱导肝病的肝脏受者。Cox回归模型测试了移植前治疗之间的关联,人口统计学和临床特征,和结果措施。
    结果:236例肝脏受者(男性188例[79.7%];白人210例[89%];平均随访,88.6±55.0个月),212人(90.2%)完成移植前治疗,135人(57.2%)每周参加AA治疗。在5年,16.3%和8.2%的人再次饮酒和高剂量饮酒,分别。移植前6个月吸烟与任何复发(P=.0002)和大剂量复发(P<.0001)有关,移植时吸烟与死亡相关(P=.001)。高剂量复发与死亡相关(风险比,3.5;P<.0001)。
    结论:移植中心的指南要求禁欲,治疗,与先前在美国可比的大型移植计划中报道的相比,AA参与的移植后复发率较低。戒烟可以进一步改善移植后的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of standardized pretransplant alcohol abstinence and treatment guidelines on liver transplant outcomes.
    METHODS: This study assessed the posttransplant relapse and survival associated with a pretransplant guideline mandating alcohol abstinence, addiction treatment, and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) attendance. This retrospective cohort study included liver recipients with alcohol-induced liver disease transplanted between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2012, at a Midwest transplant center. Cox regression models tested for associations between pretransplant treatment, demographic and clinical characteristics, and outcome measures.
    RESULTS: Of 236 liver recipients (188 [79.7%] male; 210 [89%] white; mean follow-up, 88.6±55.0 months), 212 (90.2%) completed pretransplant treatment and 135 (57.2%) attended AA weekly. At 5 years, 16.3% and 8.2% had relapsed to any alcohol use and to high-dose drinking, respectively. Smoking during the 6 months before transplant was associated with any relapse (P=.0002) and high-dose relapse (P<.0001), and smoking at transplant was associated with death (P=.001). High-dose relapse was associated with death (hazard ratio, 3.5; P<.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: A transplant center with a guideline requiring abstinence, treatment, and AA participation experienced lower posttransplant relapse rates from those previously reported in comparable large US transplant programs. Smoking cessation may further improve posttransplant outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号