AL, light chain amyloidosis

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:低QRS电压(LQRSV)是轻链淀粉样变性(AL)和转甲状腺素蛋白淀粉样变性(ATTR)心脏淀粉样变性(CA)患者的常见心电图特征。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的目的是确定LQRSV的临床和超声心动图相关性,并探讨其在CA患者中的预后意义。
    未经评估:这是一个多中心,在6个CA转诊中心进行的回顾性研究,包括连续的AL和ATTRCA患者.LQRSV定义为所有外周导线的QRS振幅≤5mm(0.5mV)。研究结果为心血管(CV)死亡率。
    未经评估:总的来说,包括411例(ALCA:n=120,ATTRCA:n=291)患者。66例(55%)ALCA患者和103例(35%)ATTRCA患者存在LQRSV(P<0.001)。在ALCA,LQRSV与年龄无关(P=0.015)。纽约心脏协会功能分级较高(P=0.016),和利钠肽(P=0.041);在ATTRCA中,LQRSV与心包积液(P=0.008)和下三尖瓣环收缩期峰值偏移(P=0.038)独立相关。在33个月的中位随访期间(Q1-Q3:21-46),LQRSV独立预测ALCA(HR:1.76;95%CI:2.41-10.18;P=0.031)和ATTRCA(HR:2.64;95%CI:1.82-20.17;P=0.005)的CV死亡。连同国家淀粉样变性中心(NAC)分期,LQRSV在ATTRCA中提供了递增的预后价值(NAC模型的AUC:0.83[95%CI:0.77-0.89];NAC+LQRSV模型的AUC:0.87[95%CI:0.81-0.93];P=0.040)。
    UNASSIGNED:LQRSV在CA中很常见,但并不普遍存在;它们在ALCA中比在ATTRCA中更常见。LQRSV反映晚期疾病阶段并独立预测CV死亡。在ATTRCA,LQRSV可以为中等风险患者的NAC分期系统提供增量的预后准确性。
    UNASSIGNED: Low QRS voltages (LQRSVs) are a common electrocardiographic feature in patients with light chain amyloidosis (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) cardiac amyloidosis (CA).
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to identify clinical and echocardiographic correlates of LQRSV and to investigate their prognostic significance in patients with CA.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a multicenter, retrospective study performed in 6 CA referral centers including consecutive patients with AL and ATTR CA. LQRSVs were defined as a QRS amplitude ≤5 mm (0.5 mV) in all peripheral leads. The study outcome was cardiovascular (CV) mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 411 (AL CA: n = 120, ATTR CA: n = 291) patients were included. LQRSVs were present in 66 (55%) patients with AL CA and 103 (35%) with ATTR CA (P < 0.001). In AL CA, LQRSVs were independently associated with younger age (P = 0.015), higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = 0.016), and natriuretic peptides (P = 0.041); in ATTR CA, LQRSVs were independently associated with pericardial effusion (P = 0.008) and lower tricuspid annulus peak systolic excursion (P = 0.038). During a median follow-up of 33 months (Q1-Q3: 21-46), LQRSVs independently predicted CV death in both AL CA (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 2.41-10.18; P = 0.031) and ATTR CA (HR: 2.64; 95% CI: 1.82-20.17; P = 0.005). Together with the National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) staging, LQRSVs provided incremental prognostic value in ATTR CA (AUC for NAC model: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.77-0.89]; AUC for NAC + LQRSV model: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81-0.93]; P = 0.040).
    UNASSIGNED: LQRSVs are common but not ubiquitous in CA; they are more frequent in AL CA than in ATTR CA. LQRSVs reflect an advanced disease stage and independently predict CV death. In ATTR CA, LQRSVs can provide incremental prognostic accuracy over the NAC staging system in patients with intermediate risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床医生在患者接触期间的时间有限,这可能导致患者的担忧得不到解决。这项研究的目的是测试电子患者报告的结果生活质量工具(PROQOL)是否可以改善癌症患者的生活质量(QOL)。
    这项单中心非盲前瞻性临床试验将患者(2:1)随机接受PROQOL与常规治疗(UC)。纳入了两个患者队列:血液系统恶性肿瘤(多发性骨髓瘤[MM]或轻链淀粉样变性[AL])和实体瘤(头颈部[H/N]或妇科[GYN]恶性肿瘤)。主要终点是通过单项目线性模拟自我评估测量的患者报告的12个月时的QOL。对患者的价值和对临床医生工作流程的影响是使用“值得吗”调查来衡量的。该研究有能力检测组间0.5个标准偏差差异。
    共纳入383例患者,171配MM,62AL,113GYN,2016年7月至2018年4月期间为37H/N,随访12个月。男性患者为171例(44.6%),中位年龄为62岁(范围31-87)。最常选择的关注是身体健康(30.9%),其次是癌症诊断和治疗(29.1%)。12个月时,PROQOL的平均QOL为7.12,UC(0-10量表)为6.98,总体上(p=0.56)或在血液学或实体瘤队列中没有组间差异,分别。在患者中,74%的人认为PROQOL工具是值得的,86%的人会再次选择PROQOL,81%的人会推荐给其他人。在临床医生中,95%的人回答说PROQOL是值得的,并且认为PROQOL不会对他们的工作流程产生负面影响。
    虽然我们没有证明PROQOL组和UC组之间的QOL差异,但PROQOL工具在确定患者的主要关注点方面具有相当大的价值,对患者和临床医生来说都是值得的。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians have limited time during patient encounters which can result in patients\' concerns not being addressed. This study\'s objective was to test whether an electronic patient-reported outcome quality of life tool (PROQOL) in which patients identify their primary concern during clinic visits improves cancer patient quality of life (QOL).
    UNASSIGNED: This single center non-blinded prospective clinical trial randomized patients (2:1) to PROQOL versus usual care (UC). Two patient cohorts were enrolled: those with hematologic malignancies (multiple myeloma [MM] or light chain amyloidosis [AL]) and solid tumors (head and neck [H/N] or gynecologic [GYN] malignancies). Primary endpoint was patient-reported QOL at 12 months measured by a single-item Linear Analog Self-Assessment. Value to patients and impact on clinician workflow was measured using a \"was it worth it\" survey. The study was powered to detect a 0.5 standard deviation difference between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall 383 patients were enrolled, 171 with MM, 62 AL, 113 GYN, and 37 H/N between July 2016 and April 2018, with 12-month follow-up. There were 171 (44.6%) male patients and median age was 62 years (range 31-87). The most often selected concern was physical health (30.9%), and second was cancer diagnosis and treatment (29.1%). Mean QOL was 7.12 for PROQOL and 6.98 for UC (0-10 scale) at 12 months, with no between-group difference overall (p = 0.56) or within hematologic or solid tumor cohorts, respectively. Among patients, 74% thought the PROQOL tool was worthwhile, 86% would choose PROQOL again, and 81% would recommend it to others. Among clinicians, 95% responded that PROQOL was worthwhile and did not think that PROQOL negatively impacted their workflow.
    UNASSIGNED: Although we did not demonstrate a QOL difference between PROQOL and UC groups; the PROQOL tool held considerable value in identifying patients\' main concerns over time and was worthwhile for patients and clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏淀粉样变性(CA)已成为以前低估的心力衰竭和死亡率的原因。诊断不足主要是由于对疾病的真实患病率和疾病的非特异性症状的认识不足。错误折叠蛋白原纤维细胞外沉积的CA结果,通常来源于转甲状腺素蛋白(ATTR)或免疫球蛋白轻链(AL)。相当比例的老年心力衰竭和其他心外表现患者患有ATTR-CA,而AL-CA仍然被认为是一种罕见的疾病。本文概述了CA,并特别关注当前和新兴的诊断方式。此外,我们提供了一种诊断算法,用于在日常实践中评估疑似CA患者.
    Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) has emerged as a previously underestimated cause of heart failure and mortality. Underdiagnosis resulted mainly from unawareness of the true disease prevalence and the non-specific symptoms of the disease. CA results from extracellular deposition of misfolded protein fibrils, commonly derived from transthyretin (ATTR) or immunoglobulin light chains (AL). A significant proportion of older patients with heart failure and other extracardiac manifestations suffer from ATTR-CA, whereas AL-CA is still considered a rare disease. This article provides an overview of CA with a special focus on current and emerging diagnostic modalities. Furthermore, we provide a diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of patients with suspected CA in every-day practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏淀粉样变性是一种限制性心肌病,由错误折叠的轻链或甲状腺素运载蛋白的沉积引起,最常见的是,在心脏组织中。传统上,轻链(AL)和甲状腺素运载蛋白(ATTR)淀粉样变性的治疗选择有限.然而,目前有多种新疗法正在开发中,最近批准的几种疗法有望彻底改变AL和ATTR的临床管理.这些药物中的大多数破坏淀粉样蛋白生成的特定阶段,如轻链或运甲状腺素蛋白的产生,淀粉样中间体的形成,或淀粉样蛋白原纤维聚集。其他人的目标是使用单克隆抗体技术去除现有的淀粉样蛋白组织沉积物。尽管这些进展代表了心脏淀粉样变性患者护理的重要一步,需要更多的研究来确定AL和ATTR的最佳治疗模式,并验证临床,成像,或血清生物标志物策略,可以确认心脏对治疗的反应。
    Cardiac amyloidosis is a restrictive cardiomyopathy that results from the deposition of misfolded light chain or transthyretin proteins, most commonly, in cardiac tissue. Traditionally, treatment options for light chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis have been limited. However, there are now multiple novel therapeutics in development and several therapeutics recently approved that promise to revolutionize clinical management of AL and ATTR. Most of these agents disrupt specific stages of amyloidogenesis such as light chain or transthyretin protein production, formation of amyloidogenic intermediates, or amyloid fibril aggregation. Others aim to remove existing amyloid tissue deposits using monoclonal antibody technology. Although these advances represent an important step forward in the care of cardiac amyloidosis patients, additional studies are needed to define the optimal treatment paradigms for AL and ATTR and to validate clinical, imaging, or serum biomarker strategies that may confirm a cardiac response to therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号