ACLR

ACLR
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后血流限制(BFR)训练与非BFR康复方案的神经肌肉和临床结局。
    方法:根据2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南,通过查询PubMed,MEDLINE,Scopus,Cochrane系统评价数据库,和Cochrane中央对照试验注册数据库从开始到2023年12月,以确定评估ACLR与非BFR康复后BFR训练结果的I-II级RCT。使用具有标准化平均差异(SMD)的随机效应模型对疼痛进行荟萃分析,肌肉力量,和肌肉体积,同时计算患者报告结局指标的平均差(MD)。
    结果:八个RCT,由245名患者组成,符合纳入标准,115例接受非BFR康复的患者与130例接受ACLR后BFR康复的患者。患者平均年龄为27.2±6.7岁,大多数患者是男性(63.3%,n=138/218)。BFR康复方案的长度最常见的是8-12周(范围,14天-16周)。大多数研究将BFR组的肢体/动脉闭塞压力设定为80%。与非BFR康复相比,BFR导致等速肌力的显着改善(SMD:0.77,p=0.02,I2:58%),IKDC评分(MD:10.97,p=<.00001,I2:77%),和疼痛(SMD:1.52,p=.04,I2:87%),但不是股四头肌体积(SMD:0.28,p=0.43,I2:76%)。
    结论:ACLR后使用BFR可改善疼痛,IKDC评分和等速肌力,基于股四头肌力量的可变结果,与非BFR康复相比,体积和厚度。
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating neuromuscular and clinical outcomes of blood flow restriction (BFR) training after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to non-BFR rehabilitation protocols.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses guidelines by querying PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Database for Systematic Review, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases from inception through December 2023 to identify Level I-II RCTs evaluating outcomes of BFR training after ACLR compared to non-BFR rehabilitation. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with standardized mean difference (SMD) for pain, muscle strength, and muscle volume, while mean difference (MD) was calculated for patient-reported outcome measures.
    RESULTS: Eight RCTs, consisting of 245 patients, met inclusion criteria, with 115 patients undergoing non-BFR rehabilitation versus 130 patients undergoing BFR after ACLR. Mean patient age was 27.2 ± 6.7 years, with the majority of patients being male (63.3%, n=138/218). The length of the BFR rehabilitation protocol was most commonly between 8-12 weeks (range, 14 days - 16 weeks). The majority of studies set the limb/arterial occlusion pressure in the BFR group at 80%. When compared to non-BFR rehabilitation, BFR resulted in significant improvement in isokinetic muscle strength (SMD: 0.77, p=0.02, I2: 58%), IKDC score (MD: 10.97, p=<.00001, I2: 77%), and pain (SMD: 1.52, p=.04, I2: 87%), but not quadriceps muscle volume (SMD: 0.28, p=0.43, I2: 76%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of BFR following ACLR led to improvements in pain, IKDC score and isokinetic muscle strength, with variable outcomes based on quadriceps strength, volume and thickness when compared to non-BFR rehabilitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后6个月的短期随访中,通过超声成像研究股四头肌腱供体部位的愈合情况,并研究临床结果。
    在2019年3月至2020年8月之间,本研究回顾性纳入了61个膝盖。术中,长度,测量收获的QT移植物的宽度和厚度。在6个月的随访中,患者由五名放射科医生中的一名进行评估,遵循相同的协议来计算缺陷体积,患者在视觉模拟量表上对疼痛进行了自我评估,国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)。
    术中,QT移植物的体积为4635.4±912.5mm3。术后,在6.5±0.7个月时进行超声检查,缺损体积为323.3±389.2mm3,代表供体部位的93%±9%的愈合率。在至少6个月的随访中,IKDC为61.6±16,KOOS为70.2±16.6。年龄与治愈率显着相关(β:-0.005;p=0.032)。
    随访6个月时,根据超声测量,QT供体部位的缺损大小已愈合93±9%,留下的平均缺损体积为323.3mm3.这表明QT在移植物收获后具有很高的愈合能力,10例患者在手术后6个月达到完全缺损闭合。这些发现的临床相关性是股四头肌腱供体部位的愈合率高,但是外科医生应该意识到老年患者的治愈率较低。
    四级,回顾性病例系列。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the healing of the quadriceps tendon donor site after partial thickness graft harvesting through ultrasound imaging at a short-term follow-up of 6-month following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Between March 2019 and August 2020, 61 knees were retrospectively included in this study. Intraoperatively, the length, width and thickness of the harvested QT graft were measured. At a 6-month follow-up, patients were assessed by one of five radiologists, following the same protocol to calculate the defect volume, and patients performed a self-evaluation of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS).
    UNASSIGNED: Intraoperatively, the QT grafts had a volume of 4635.4 ± 912.5 mm3. Postoperatively, ultrasound was performed at 6.5 ± 0.7 months, and the defect volume was 323.3 ± 389.2 mm3, representing a healing rate of 93% ± 9% of the donor site. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, IKDC was 61.6 ± 16 and KOOS was 70.2 ± 16.6. Age was significantly associated with the healing rate (β: -0.005; p = 0.032).
    UNASSIGNED: At 6 months follow-up, the defect size of the QT donor site had healed by 93 ± 9% leaving a mean defect volume of 323.3 mm3 according to ultrasound measurements. This suggests that the QT has a high capacity for healing after graft harvesting, with 10 patients reaching full defect closure 6 months after surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings is that the quadriceps tendon donor site has high rates of healing, but surgeons should be aware of lower healing rates in older patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Level IV, retrospective case series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项多中心研究旨在确定ACL重建患者半月板外侧后根撕裂(LMPRTs)的发生率,并确定相关的危险因素。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,使用法语关节镜学会注册数据的多中心研究。该研究纳入了在2020年6月至2023年6月期间接受ACL重建手术的所有患者,我们排除了不完整的数据。我们比较了LMPRTs组与无LMPRTs组之间从损伤到手术的延迟。作为LMPRT潜在风险因素的变量包括年龄,性别,手术性质(主要或修正),枢轴移位测试结果,麻醉下左右松弛,ACL残余的存在,发生内侧半月板撕裂,和副韧带损伤的存在。采用Logistic回归模型对危险因素进行分析。
    结果:在分析的5359名患者中,在ACL重建期间,LMPRT发生在7.0%(n=375)的病例中。手术时的平均年龄为29.3+/-10.3岁[11-77]。关于推迟手术,无LMPRTs组的平均时间为8.4+/-23.1周[0.0-347.2],LMPRTs组为6.5+/-10.2周[0.2-61.6](p=0.109).单因素分析显示男性(p<0.001),翻修手术(p<0.001),内侧半月板损伤(p=0.007),ACL剩余(0%vs>70%,<10%vs>70%,10%至30%vs>70%,30%至50%vs>70%,50%至70%vs>70%;p<0.001)和较高的枢轴移位等级(p=0.011)与LMPRT的存在显着相关。年龄,一边到一边的松弛,在多变量分析中,未发现副韧带损伤是显著的危险因素:男性,翻修手术,枢轴移位测试结果和少量ACL残留物仍然很重要。在多变量分析中,左右松弛也是一个重要因素。
    结论:这项研究确定了男性,翻修手术,ACL剩余量低,左右松弛和枢轴移位等级较高是ACL重建期间LMPRTs的重要风险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This multicenter study aimed to determine the incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and identify associated risk factors.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society\'s registry. The study included all the patients in the registry who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between June 2020 and June 2023, we excluded incomplete data. We compared delay from injury to surgery between LMPRTs group and No LMPRTs group. Variables investigated as potential risk factors for LMPRTs included age, sex, nature of surgery (primary or revision), pivot shift test result, side-to-side laxity under anesthesia, presence of ACL remnant, occurrence of medial meniscal tear, and presence of collateral ligament injury. Risk factors were analyzed using a logistic regression model.
    RESULTS: Among the 5359 patients analyzed, LMPRTs occurred in 7.0% (n=375) of cases during ACL reconstruction. Mean age at surgery was 29.3 +/- 10.3 years old [11-77]. Concerning delay to surgery, the mean time was 8.4 +/- 23.1 weeks [0.0-347.2] in the No LMPRTs group and 6.5 +/- 10.2 weeks [0.2-61.6] in the LMPRTs group (p = 0.109). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex (p < 0.001), revision surgery (p < 0.001), medial meniscal injury (p = 0.007), ACL remnant (0% vs > 70%, <10% vs > 70%, 10 to 30% vs > 70%, 30 to 50% vs > 70%, 50 to 70% vs > 70%; p < 0.001) and higher pivot shift grade (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with a presence of LMPRTs. Age, side-to-side laxity, and collateral ligament injury were not found to be significant risk factor In multivariate analysis : male sex, revision surgery, pivot shift test result and a low volume of ACL remnant remained significant. Side to side laxity was also a significant factor in multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified male sex, revision surgery, low volume of ACL remnant, side to side laxity and higher grade of pivot shift as significant risk factors for LMPRTs during ACL reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    运动诱发扭矩(MEPTORQUE)的操作调节可以直接靶向前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者的皮质脊髓途径。然而,目前尚不清楚操作性预处理是否能引起皮质脊髓兴奋性的短期改善,以及这些改善是否受刺激强度的影响.
    股四头肌MEPTORQUE反应可以在单个会话中进行调整,并引起皮质脊髓兴奋性的短期适应,更高的刺激强度会产生更大的效果。
    随机对照实验室研究。
    二级。
    对36名参与者进行了评估,在一个操作调节方案的一个疗程中。根据参与者的主动运动阈值(AMT:100%,120%,和140%)。在对照经颅磁刺激试验(CTRL)中评估股四头肌MEPTORQUE振幅,以建立基线皮质脊髓兴奋性,和3组条件试验(COND),在此期间参与者接受训练以改善他们的MEPTORQUE。收集MEPTORQUE募集曲线以评估操作性预处理对急性皮质脊髓适应的影响。
    ACL重建的参与者可以在单个会话中改善其MEPTORQUE(P<0.01;CTRL,17.27±1.28;COND,21.35±1.28[平均值±标准误差[SE],单位为N·m]),但这种能力不受训练期间使用的刺激强度的影响(P=0.84)。此外,观察到皮质脊髓兴奋性的显著改善(P=0.05;PRE,687.91±50.15;开机自检,761.08±50.15[平均值±SE,N·m%AMT]),但刺激强度不影响皮质脊髓适应(P=0.67).
    可操作的预处理可以引起ACL重建患者的短期神经适应。未来的操作调节范例可以有效地使用本文研究的3种刺激强度中的任何一种。
    手术条件可能是改善ACL重建后皮质脊髓兴奋性的可行方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Operant conditioning of motor evoked torque (MEPTORQUE) can directly target the corticospinal pathway in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, it remains unclear whether operant conditioning can elicit short-term improvements in corticospinal excitability and whether these improvements are influenced by stimulus intensity.
    UNASSIGNED: Quadriceps MEPTORQUE responses can be upconditioned in a single session and will elicit short-term adaptations in corticospinal excitability, with higher stimulus intensities eliciting greater effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled laboratory study.
    UNASSIGNED: Level 2.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-six participants were assessed during a single session of an operant conditioning protocol. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups for stimulus intensity used during operant conditioning based on the participant\'s active motor threshold (AMT: 100%, 120%, and 140%). Quadriceps MEPTORQUE amplitude was evaluated during a block of control transcranial magnetic stimulation trials (CTRL) to establish baseline corticospinal excitability, and 3 blocks of conditioning trials (COND) during which participants trained to upcondition their MEPTORQUE. MEPTORQUE recruitment curves were collected to evaluate the effect of operant conditioning on acute corticospinal adaptations.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants with ACL reconstruction could upcondition their MEPTORQUE in a single session (P < 0.01; CTRL, 17.27 ± 1.28; COND, 21.35 ± 1.28 [mean ± standard error [SE] in N·m]), but this ability was not influenced by the stimulus intensity used during training (P = 0.84). Furthermore, significant improvements in corticospinal excitability were observed (P = 0.05; PRE, 687.91 ± 50.15; POST, 761.08 ± 50.15 [mean ± SE in N·m %AMT]), but stimulus intensity did not influence corticospinal adaptations (P = 0.67).
    UNASSIGNED: Operant conditioning can elicit short-term neural adaptations in ACL-reconstructed patients. Future operant conditioning paradigms may effectively use any of the 3 stimulus intensities studied herein.
    UNASSIGNED: Operant conditioning may be a feasible approach to improve corticospinal excitability after ACL reconstruction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精确前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)是指个体化的预康复方法,手术(包括解剖学、骨形态,和伴随损伤的修复/重建),康复后,功能恢复。这种个性化的方法有望彻底改变骨科运动医学,旨在改善患者预后。本文的目的是提供精确ACLR的摘要,从诊断到回归游戏的时间,对ACLR的未来有更多的洞察力。
    Precision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) refers to the individualized approach to prerehabilitation, surgery (including anatomy, bony morphology, and repair/reconstruction of concomitant injuries), postrehabilitation, and functional recovery. This individualized approach is poised to revolutionize orthopedic sports medicine, aiming to improve patient outcomes. The purpose of this article is to provide a summary of precision ACLR, from the time of diagnosis to the time of return to play, with additional insight into the future of ACLR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)的损伤常见于普通人群,在成人和儿科患者中,近年来,它们的发病率一直在增加。大多数最新文献认为,ACL的手术重建可有效改善儿科患者的长期预后。而其他人过去曾恳求非手术管理。
    目的:我们的研究旨在验证在骨骼未成熟的患者中使用跨密封技术进行ACL重建(ACLR)是否会提供角度偏差或生长限制。
    方法:回顾性队列研究;证据水平4.
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以验证在剩余生长时间小于或等于2年的儿童中,经下密封ACLR是否会导致肢体长度差异或轴偏差。
    结果:大多数使用经肺密封技术治疗的患者在功能评分方面表现出显著的改善。股骨远端外侧角(LDFA)和胫骨近端内侧角(MPTA)差异有统计学意义,没有临床影响。在2年的随访中,没有明显的肢体长度差异(LLD)。
    结论:在剩余生长时间小于或等于2年的儿童中,透明密封ACLR是安全的,并且不会带来轴偏差或肢体长度差异的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are commonly found in the general population, both among adult and pediatric patients, and their incidence has been increasing in recent years. Most of the late literature agrees that surgical reconstruction of the ACL is effective in improving long-term outcomes in pediatric patients, while others in the past have pleaded for non-surgical management.
    OBJECTIVE: Our study aims to verify if ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using transphyseal technique in skeletally immature patients will provide angular deviations or growth restrictions.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence 4.
    METHODS: We perfomed a retrospective study to verify if transphyseal ACLR in children with less than or equal to 2 years of remaining growth leads to either limb length discrepancies or axis deviations.
    RESULTS: Most patients who were treated using transphyseal technique showed significant improvements in their functional scores. There were statistically significant differences in lateral distal femoral angles (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angles (MPTA), with no clinical impact. There was no significant limb length discrepancy (LLD) during the 2-year follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transphyseal ACLR is safe among children who have less than or equal to 2 years of remaining growth and brings no risk of axis deviations or limb length discrepancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    感染是关节镜手术的罕见副作用,在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)手术中这个比例更高,使用移植物和固定装置的地方。感染不仅会导致膝关节高再入院率和功能恢复不良,而且会对患者的心理和经济健康产生显著的负面影响。尤其是运动员,因为这会影响他们的体育事业。重要的是要意识到许多风险因素,尤其是症状的表现。这些有时可能对传染性病理是非特异性的,对其他情况也是常见的,例如存在明显的关节内血肿。ACLR后的化脓性关节炎可在手术后的任何时间发生,但通常表现为急性,而晚期表现相对罕见。感染的诊断是基于患者病史,体检,实验室参数,关节抽吸后的滑液分析,是诊断术后感染的金标准.一旦症状出现并且诊断似乎确定,有必要通过关节镜清理和长期抗生素治疗进行快速干预,以尽量挽救移植物并解决感染情况,以避免移植物失败和关节纤维化后遗症。本文的目的是提供流行病学的概述,发病机制,危险因素,临床表现,诊断评估,通过分析最近的文献,以及ACLR术后化脓性关节炎的现行治疗指南,特别是荟萃分析和系统评价。
    Infection is an uncommon side effect of arthroscopic surgery, and this percentage is higher in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, where graft and fixation devices are used. Infections can not only lead to high re-admission rates and poor functional recovery of the knee but can also have a significant negative impact on the patient\'s psychological and economic health, especially in athletes, as it can affect their sports career. It is important to be aware of the many risk factors, especially the manifestation of symptoms. These may sometimes be non-specific to the infectious pathology and common to other situations, such as the presence of a significant intra-articular hematoma. Septic arthritis after ACLR can occur at any time after surgery but typically presents acutely, while late manifestation is relatively rare. Diagnosis of infection is based on patient history, physical examination, laboratory parameters, and analysis of synovial fluid after joint aspiration, which is the gold standard for diagnosing post-operative infection. Once symptoms appear and the diagnosis seems certain, it is necessary to intervene quickly with arthroscopic debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment to try to save the graft and resolve the infectious situation to avoid graft failure and arthrofibrotic sequelae. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and current treatment guidelines of septic arthritis after ACLR surgery by analyzing recent literature, in particular meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后,只有47%的军人复职,可能是由于持续的神经肌肉不对称。心理因素也可能导致军人复职减少。
    手术后的心理因素和时间与神经肌肉不对称呈负相关,与健康对照组相比,手术后学员的不对称性会更大,在ACLR之后的较早时间点,不对称性会更大。
    案例控制。
    4级。
    这项研究检查了自神经肌肉不对称手术以来心理因素与时间之间的关系,比较有和没有ACLR病史的学员之间的神经肌肉不对称性,并探讨了有ACLR病史的学员在不同时间点神经肌肉不对称性的差异。ACLR后(18.3±9个月)共有37名学员和28名对照参加。使用运动恐惧症坦帕量表和前交叉韧带损伤后恢复运动量表(ACL-RSI)评估心理因素。参与者进行了跳伞着陆,关节定位感(JPS),和等距股四头肌强度测试。峰值垂直地面反作用力(vGRF),绝对复制角度,股四头肌峰值扭矩,扭矩发展率(RTD),和RTD时间扭矩间隔200ms(TTI200)进行了分析。
    ACL-RSI评分与四肢对称指数(LSI)股四头肌峰值扭矩显着相关(r=0.617,P<0.01),LSIRTD(r=0.367,P=0.05),和LSITTI200(r=0.0489,P<0.01),但手术后还没有时间,JPS,或LSI峰值vGRF。与对照组相比,有ACLR病史的学员的ACL-RSI评分明显较低,不对称性更大。
    ACLR后,心理准备程度降低与神经肌肉不对称性增加有关。
    临床医生应评估ACLR后康复期间的心理准备情况。
    UNASSIGNED: After an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), only 47% of military members return to full duty, possibly due to persistent neuromuscular asymmetries. Psychological factors may also contribute to reduced return to duty in military members.
    UNASSIGNED: Psychological factors and time since surgery would be associated negatively with neuromuscular asymmetries, asymmetries would be greater in cadets postsurgery when compared with healthy controls, and asymmetries would be greater at earlier timepoints after ACLR.
    UNASSIGNED: Case control.
    UNASSIGNED: Level 4.
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined the relationship between psychological factors and time since surgery with neuromuscular asymmetry, compared neuromuscular asymmetries between cadets with and without a history of ACLR, and explored differences in neuromuscular asymmetries at different timepoints in cadets with a history of ACLR. A total of 37 cadets post-ACLR (18.3 ± 9 months) and 28 controls participated. Psychological factors were assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI). Participants performed a drop-jump landing, joint positioning sense (JPS), and isometric quadriceps strength testing. Peak vertical ground-reaction forces (vGRF), absolute angle of replication, peak quadriceps torque, rate of torque development (RTD), and RTD time torque interval 200 ms (TTI200) were analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The ACL-RSI score was significantly related to limb symmetry index (LSI) peak quadriceps torque (r = 0.617, P < 0.01), LSI RTD (r = 0.367, P = 0.05), and LSI TTI200 (r = 0.0489, P < 0.01), but not time since surgery, JPS, or LSI peak vGRF. Cadets with a history of ACLR had significantly lesser ACL-RSI scores and greater asymmetries compared with controls.
    UNASSIGNED: Reduced psychological readiness was associated with increased neuromuscular asymmetries after ACLR.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicians should assess psychological readiness during rehabilitation after ACLR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究旨在评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者中斜坡病变的患病率,并确定与这些病变相关的危险因素。
    方法:回顾性研究,多中心队列研究使用法语国家关节镜学会注册数据进行,包括从2020年6月至2023年6月接受ACL重建(ACLR)的5359例患者。斜坡病变的潜在风险因素,如患者人口统计学,翻修手术,枢轴移位,左右前后松弛,内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤,使用多变量回归分析评估外侧半月板撕裂和韧带残余体积.还评估了BMI和手术延迟。
    结果:在822例患者中发现了斜坡病变(15.3%)。单变量分析确定了男性,年龄较小,翻修手术,外侧半月板损伤,ACL残余百分比(所有p<0.0001)和枢轴移位(p=0.0103)是显著的危险因素。MCL损伤与较低的风险相关(p<0.0001)。在多变量分析中,男性,年龄较小,翻修手术,外侧半月板损伤和ACL残留百分比仍然是重要的危险因素,MCL损伤仍是保护因素。在这两种分析中,前后松弛都不是一个重要的预测指标。在亚组分析中,体重指数存在差异(n.s)和手术延迟(n。s).
    结论:该研究确定了男性,年龄较小,翻修手术,外侧半月板损伤和ACL残存率是斜坡病变的重要危险因素,MCL损伤是保护因素。这将有助于对斜坡病变的怀疑和识别。
    方法:三级。
    OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ramp lesions among patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and identify risk factors associated with these lesions.
    METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre cohort study was conducted using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society\'s registry, including 5359 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction (ACLR) from June 2020 to June 2023. Potential risk factors for ramp lesion such as patient demographics, revision surgery, pivot shift, side-to-side anteroposterior laxity, medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury, lateral meniscal tear and the volume of ligament remnant were evaluated using multivariate regression analyses. BMI and delay to surgery were also assessed.
    RESULTS: Ramp lesions were identified in 822 patients (15.3%). Univariate analysis identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury, percentage of ACL remnant (all p < 0.0001) and pivot shift (p = 0.0103) as significant risk factors. MCL injury was associated with a lower risk (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and percentage of ACL remnants remained significant risk factors, while MCL injury remained a protective factor. The anteroposterior laxity wasn\'t a significant predictor in either analysis. In subgroup analysis, there were differences concerning body mass index (n.s) and the delay to surgery (n.s).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study identified male sex, younger age, revision surgery, lateral meniscal injury and pourcentage of ACL remnant as significant risk factors for ramp lesions, with MCL injury acting as a protective factor. This will help regarding the suspicion and identification of ramp lesions.
    METHODS: Level III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号