OBJECTIVE: This manuscript presents a comprehensive framework for the assessment of the value of real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making. While RWE has been proposed to overcome some limitations of traditional, one-off studies, no systematic framework exists to measure if RWE actually lowers the burden. This framework aims to fill that gap by providing conceptual approaches for evaluating the time and cost efficiencies of RWE, thus guiding strategic investments in RWE infrastructure.
METHODS: The framework consists of four components: (114th Congress. 21st Century Cures Act.; 2015. https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ255/PLAW-114publ255.pdf .) identification of stakeholders using and producing RWE, (National Health Council. Glossary of Patient Engagement Terms. Published 2019. Accessed May 18. 2021. https://nationalhealthcouncil.org/glossary-of-patient-engagement-terms/ .) understanding value propositions on how RWE can benefit stakeholders, (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. CDER Patient-Focused Drug Development. U.S. Food & Drug Administration.) defining key performance indicators (KPIs), and (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Food and Drug Administration: Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. 2017. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guida .) establishing metrics and case studies to assess value. KPIs are categorized as \'better, faster, or cheaper\" as an indicator of value: better focusing on high-quality actionable evidence; \'faster,\' denoting time-saving in evidence generation, and \'cheaper,\' emphasizing cost-efficiency decision compared to methodologies that do not involve data routinely collected in clinical practice. Metrics and relevant case studies are tailored based on stakeholder value propositions and selected KPIs that can be used to assess what value has been created by using RWE compared to traditional evidence-generation approaches and comparing different RWE sources.
RESULTS: Operationalized through metrics and case studies drawn from the literature, the value of RWE is documented as improving treatment effect heterogeneity evaluation, expanding medical product labels, and expediting post-market compliance. RWE is also shown to reduce the cost and time required to produce evidence compared to traditional one-off approaches. An original example of a metric that measures the time saved by RWE methods to detect a signal of a product failure was presented based on analysis of the National Cardiovascular Disease Registry.
CONCLUSIONS: The framework presented in this manuscript offers a comprehensive approach for evaluating the value of RWE, applicable to all stakeholders engaged in leveraging RWE for healthcare decision-making. Through the proposed metrics and illustrated case studies, valuable insights are provided into the heightened efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and improved decision-making within clinical and regulatory domains facilitated by RWE. While this framework is primarily focused on medical devices, it could potentially inform the determination of RWE value in other medical products. By discerning the variations in cost, time, and data utility among various evidence-generation methods, stakeholders are empowered to invest strategically in RWE infrastructure and shape future research endeavors.

OBJECTIVE: Malignant melanoma is an aggressive cancer, and there is a notable dearth on epidemiology, clinical and treatment characterization within the Portuguese population. We performed a scoping review to identify real-world evidence studies focused in Portuguese adult patients with malignant melanoma.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted. After screening, we described the studies by design, sample size, geographics, setting, population, and outcomes reported.
RESULTS: The search yielded 54 studies, mainly retrospective (79.6%). The population assessed was heterogeneous varying from patients with melanoma in general to specific types of melanoma, or even more restricted to patients with specific conditions. The evidence found was mostly concerning clinical outcomes (n=46), patients\' clinical profile (n=44) and demographic characterization (n=48). Treatment information was described in 30 studies whereas only 18 reported epidemiological parameters. Studies were mainly performed by the major oncology centers in Lisbon, Oporto and Coimbra, and only two evaluated the entire Portuguese population. To allow comparability, only studies including patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma were considered (13 of the 54) for outcomes evaluation analysis. Median OS varied from 18 to 36 months, assessed after melanoma treatment. Incidence was the most reported epidemiological parameter, confirming the increasing number of cutaneous malignant melanoma patients over the years. Only one study reported prevalence and four reported mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence found confirms the lack of information about malignant melanoma in Portugal, highlighting the need of real-world studies to assess melanoma prevalence and incidence rates, current treatment approaches, and clinical characterization of these patients.

Advances in treatment have improved the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, but the disease remains incurable. Here, in this nationwide retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) study, we report the patient characteristics, incidence, overall survival outcomes, comorbidities, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of all adult MM patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2021 in Finland. A total of 7070 MM patients and their 21,210 age-, sex- and region-matched controls were included in the analysis. The average MM incidence doubled from 4.11 to 8.33 per 100,000 people during the follow-up. The average age-standardized incidence also showed a significant increase over time (2.51 in 2000 to 3.53 in 2021). An increase in incidence was particularly seen in older population, indicative of improved diagnosis praxis. The median overall survival (mOS) of the MM patients and their matched controls was 3.6 and 15.6 years, respectively. The mOS of all MM patients increased significantly from 2.8 years (2000-2004) to 4.4 years (2017-2021) during the follow-up period. Distinctively, in patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the mOS was 9.2 years, while in patients who did not receive ASCT, the mOS was only 2.7 years. MM patients showed more comorbidities at index and increased HCRU than their matched controls. The longer median survival and decreased risk of death indicate improved treatment outcomes in MM patients in Finland.

Advances in understanding of the pathogenesis of B-cell lymphoma have led to development of various novel targeted therapies. Among them, CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for relapsed and refractory B-cell lymphomas have shown remarkable efficacy in clinical trials, and three CAR T-cell products are now available in Japan. Real-world evidence (RWE) has shown that these products can provide comparable efficacy to clinical trials in clinical practice, where CAR T-cells were administered in patients with wider range of backgrounds. This finding will certainly broaden the role of CAR T-cell therapies in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. However, since about half of the patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy progress thereafter, there is an urgent need for risk stratification and optimized management of refractory cases. Here, we review the results of clinical trials and RWE of CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell lymphoma.

The mpox 2022 outbreak was declared a public health emergency in July 2022. In August 2022, the MVA-BN vaccine received emergency use authorization in the United States (US) to target at-risk groups. This study (EUPAS104386) used HealthVerity\'s administrative US healthcare data to generate real-world evidence for MVA-BN vaccine effectiveness and safety to prevent mpox disease in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, the most affected population during the 2022 mpox outbreak. Fully vaccinated subjects (two doses ≥ 28 days apart) were initially matched with five unvaccinated subjects on calendar date, age, US region, and insurance type. Subjects were followed from index date (14 days after the second dose) until death or data end to ascertain mpox occurrence. After propensity score adjustment, the MVA-BN vaccine effectiveness against mpox disease was 89% (95% CI: 12%, 99%) among those fully vaccinated; attenuated to 64% (95% CI: 40%, 78%) among those with any dose and 70% (95% CI: 44%, 84%) for those with only a single dose. One pericarditis adverse event of special interest was observed when the risk window was extended to 28 days. These results contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the favorable benefit/risk profile of the MVA-BN vaccine.

Adaptive designs, such as group sequential designs (and the ones with additional adaptive features) or adaptive platform trials, have been quintessential efficient design strategies in trials of unmet medical needs, especially for generating evidence from global regions. Such designs allow interim decision making and making adjustment to study design when necessary, meanwhile maintaining study integrity and operating characteristics. However, driven by the heightened competitive landscape and the desire to bring effective treatment to patients faster, innovation in the already functional designs is still germane to further propel drug development to a more efficient path. One way to achieve this is by leveraging external real-world data (RWD) in the adaptive designs to support interim or final decision making. In this paper, we propose a novel framework of incorporating external RWD in adaptive design to improve interim and/or final analysis decision making. Within this framework, researchers can prespecify the decision process and choose the timing and amount of borrowing while maintaining objectivity and controlling of type I error. Simulation studies in various scenarios are provided to describe power, type I error, and other performance metrics for interim/final decision making. A case study in non-small cell lung cancer is used for illustration on proposed design framework.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Although used for over 100 years, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is still an indispensable tool in modern allergy managemen20t due to its potential to cure allergic diseases. Its current rapid development through the application of personalized and precision medicine approaches is strongly supported by advances in mHealth, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD)-based diagnostics, validation of novel biomarkers, advanced data management, and development of novel preparations. This review summarizes the key advances in the field and shows the perspectives for further development of next-generation AIT treatments.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is a valuable resource unique to China with a long history of human use and clinical practice, which can be analyzed to generate real-world evidence (RWE). The Chinese government has been actively promoting regulatory reform that is in line with the characteristics of TCM, optimizing the clinical evidence system for TCM, and exploring the important role of RWE in supporting the development of new drugs and regulatory decision-making for TCM. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the use of RWE in regulatory decisions for TCM. Based on the characteristics of TCM, this study focuses on the application scenarios, challenges, and opportunities of RWE in TCM. And some suggestions are put forward to promote the wider application of RWE in TCM development and supervision.