BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are established treatments for peritoneal surface malignancies, traditionally performed via laparotomy. Recent advancements in laparoscopic approaches (L-CRS + HIPEC) have shown promising results in selected patients.
METHODS: The PSOGI registry, established in November 2019, collects data from specialized centers performing L-CRS + HIPEC. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively, excluding risk-reducing procedures without peritoneal disease. The learning curve was assessed using a 14-cases cutoff.
RESULTS: Today, 323 patients have been registered, 193 were included finally. Perioperative outcomes improved after 14 cases: Length of hospital stay was 7.78 ± 3.64 days (consolidation) versus 8.8 ± 8.79 days (learning) and major morbidity was 0% (consolidation) versus 5% (learning), (p = n.s.). Estimated blood loss was lower in the consolidation phase. Oncological outcomes also improved: Recurrence rate was 8.7% (consolidation) versus 17.8% (learning). Disease-free survival 5 years, 65% (learning) versus 88% (consolidation) (p = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS: The L-CRS + HIPEC is a safe procedure with non-inferior oncologic outcomes which it is evaluating in an IDEAL setting by an international group. The validation of the learning curve, gives us the knowledge that a mentoring program must be setup to reduce the learning curve impact in oncologic failure.

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM) are aggressive and associated with poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been used to treat PSM since 1990. In Saudi Arabia, the first HIPEC and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) were performed in 2008 and 2019, respectively. With increasing incidences of PSM in Saudi Arabia, the demand for such procedures has grown. This article outlines the status of PSM management in Saudi Arabia and its prospects.

Metastasis of ovarian cancer to the stomach is extremely rare. The tumors most commonly metastasizing to the stomach include melanoma, breast, lung, and oesophageal carcinoma, while ovarian cancer comprises only 0.013-1.6% of all gastric metastatic tumors. The aim of this study was to present a rare case of an isolated metachronous gastric metastasis from an ovarian carcinoma, in a 59-year-old lady. A 59-year-old lady presented with a right adnexal mass on MRI imaging of the abdomen and pelvis and an elevated serum CA 125 of 4240 IU/ml. She underwent a primary cytoreductive surgery comprising of omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies, pelvic peritonectomy and peritoneal washing cytology, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and a retroperitoneal and pelvic nodal dissection. The surgical Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) was 5. The final histopathology showed a high-grade serous adenocarcinoma involving the right adnexa. She received six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. On a 3-monthly follow-up, the PET scan revealed that a gastric fundic lesion was noted. Investigations revealed a metachronous metastasis from the serous carcinoma of the ovary, confirmed by histopathological evaluation. The patient was treated with surgical resection of the metastasis and systemic chemotherapy to achieve disease control. Gastric metastasis from ovarian cancer should be considered a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with a gastric mass and a history of ovarian cancer.

While a rare entity, peritoneal pseudomyxoma treatment evolves. Decision-making criteria improve with imaging development and exploratory laparoscopy. Surgery remains at the core of the therapeutic strategy whatever disease progression. Complete cytoreduction plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is standard of care. Iterative cytoreduction or debulking is sometimes justified. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy modalities change with early postoperative HIPEC or pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. Systemic or local treatment such as new chemo/immuno-therapies or BromAc should improve outcomes. Expertise and multicentric cooperation are more than ever needed.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a common condition in oncology. The lack of specificity in radiological and clinical characteristics of carcinomatosis makes their etiological diagnosis difficult. Metastatic infiltrating lobular breast cancer with PC is also a common occurrence in daily medical practice. We report the case of a 45-year-old female patient with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis, admitted for lobular breast carcinoma with bone and peritoneal metastases. The surgical exploration including a biopsy revealed peritoneal tuberculosis. The focus of this paper is to discuss the diagnostic traps associated with PC in malignant tumors to highlight the importance of pathological evidence in such cases.

Lung cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a rare disease presentation. The presence of peritoneal disease is a sign of poor prognosis and is hard to diagnose. Flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) is becoming more clinically significant in the management of patients with PC. A 60-year-old male presented with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and later showed signs of peritoneal disease on 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging, which subsequently lead to the diagnoses of PC with histopathology from peritoneal biopsy. The patient showed an excellent initial response to their NSCLC treatment but later presented with PC that was shown by FDG-avid ascites and a soft tissue mass in the pelvic area. The abdominal-pelvic lesions were confirmed cytologically to be peritoneal metastatic disease. 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated value in preoperatively directing biopsy for diagnosing PC in this case of NSCLC. Further, 18 F-FDG PET/CT was useful in the monitoring of disease progression and thus influenced management in this case of NSCLC with PC, which is often challenging to detect and manage.

PIPAC is a new surgical procedure and a viable treatment option for PSM patients, due to promising therapeutic outcomes, minimal invasiveness, limited surgical morbidity, and systemic toxicity side effects. However, its implementation throughout hospitals is hard to obtain due to its fragile economical sustainability. A retrospective health economic analysis was conducted in order to evaluate the cost of hospitalization for patients undergoing PIPAC treatment at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, in Rome. The average cost of a PIPAC procedure was defined based on the cost of surgery (cost of surgical material, operating room, intraperitoneal chemotherapy), hospital stay, diagnostic examinations, and drugs used during the stay. A total of 493 PIPAC procedures were performed on 222 patients with peritoneal metastases or primary peritoneal cancer from 2017 to 2023. Since the mean remuneration for each PIPAC hospitalization is €5916 and the mean expenditure per hospitalization is €6538, this results in an operating profit per PIPAC hospitalization of -€622. The reimbursement of PIPAC treatment by the Italian National Health System currently only partially covers the hospital\'s costs. Development of specific codes and adequate reimbursement for PIPAC by recognizing this procedure as a proper treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis is essential.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with peritoneal metastases is a complex disease and its management presents significant clinical challenges. In well-selected patients at experienced centers, CRS/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be performed with acceptable morbidity and is associated with prolonged survival. Based on the results of recent randomized controlled trials, HIPEC using oxaliplatin after CRS with shortened perfusion periods (30 minutes) is no longer recommended. There is a movement toward utilizing mitomycin C as a first-line intraperitoneal agent with extended perfusion times (90-120 minutes); however, there is currently little prospective evidence to support its widespread use.

Cancer treatment with vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) causes rapid and extensive necrosis in solid tumors. However, these agents fall short in eliminating all malignant cells, ultimately leading to tumor regrowth. Here, we investigated whether the molecular changes in the tumor microenvironment induced by VDA treatment sensitize the tumors for secondary nanotherapy enhanced by clinical-stage tumor penetrating peptide iRGD. Treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and breast cancer mice with VDA combretastatin A-4 phosphate (CA4P) resulted in upregulation of the iRGD receptors αv-integrins and NRP-1, particularly in the peripheral tumor tissue. In PC mice treated with CA4P, coadministration of iRGD resulted in an approximately threefold increase in tumor accumulation and a more homogenous distribution of intraperitoneally administered nanoparticles. Notably, treatment with a combination of CA4P, iRGD, and polymersomes loaded with a novel anthracycline Utorubicin (UTO-PS) resulted in a significant decrease in the overall tumor burden in PC-bearing mice, while avoiding overt toxicities. Our results indicate that VDA-treated tumors can be targeted therapeutically using iRGD-potentiated nanotherapy and warrant further studies on the sequential targeting of VDA-induced molecular signatures.

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer maintains the highest mortality rate among gynecological malignancies. Unfortunately, two-thirds of cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage with the presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In this study, we aimed to present the 7-year results of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in cases where peritoneal carcinomatosis developed during the medical oncological treatment and follow-up after primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer debulking surgeries.
METHODS: Data from 63 patients collected prospectively in our clinic were retrospectively evaluated.
RESULTS: Postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications occurred in 12 cases (19%) and 14 cases (22.2%), respectively. CD grade 3a complications developed in four cases (6.3%), which were treated with percutaneous drainage catheters, while CD grade 3b complications occurred in eight cases (12.7%), and these cases underwent reoperation. Five cases (7.9%) experienced mortality within the first 30 days. The mean survival time was determined as 44.99 months (36.33-53.65), while the median survival time was 56 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients requiring redo surgery due to recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy are associated with longer overall survival and should be considered in the treatment of advanced-stage disease. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed in this regard.