peritoneal carcinomatosis

腹膜癌
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺癌合并腹膜癌(PC)是一种罕见的疾病表现。腹膜疾病的存在是预后不良的迹象,并且难以诊断。Flourine-18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDGPET/CT)在PC患者的治疗中变得越来越具有临床意义。一名60岁的男性患者患有非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),后来在18F-FDGPET/CT成像中显示出腹膜疾病的迹象,随后通过腹膜活检的组织病理学诊断为PC。患者对其NSCLC治疗表现出优异的初始反应,但随后表现为PC,表现为FDG-狂热的腹水和骨盆区域的软组织肿块。腹部盆腔病变经细胞学证实为腹膜转移疾病。18F-FDGPET/CT显示在术前指导活检以诊断NSCLC中的PC的价值。Further,18F-FDGPET/CT可用于监测疾病进展,因此影响了这种伴有PC的NSCLC的治疗,这通常是具有挑战性的检测和管理。
    Lung cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a rare disease presentation. The presence of peritoneal disease is a sign of poor prognosis and is hard to diagnose. Flourine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) is becoming more clinically significant in the management of patients with PC. A 60-year-old male presented with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and later showed signs of peritoneal disease on 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging, which subsequently lead to the diagnoses of PC with histopathology from peritoneal biopsy. The patient showed an excellent initial response to their NSCLC treatment but later presented with PC that was shown by FDG-avid ascites and a soft tissue mass in the pelvic area. The abdominal-pelvic lesions were confirmed cytologically to be peritoneal metastatic disease. 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated value in preoperatively directing biopsy for diagnosing PC in this case of NSCLC. Further, 18 F-FDG PET/CT was useful in the monitoring of disease progression and thus influenced management in this case of NSCLC with PC, which is often challenging to detect and manage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹膜癌病是胃肠道肿瘤患者死亡的主要原因之一。较新的局部治疗概念包括加压腹膜内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC),加压化疗药物局部应用于腹腔,通常每4到8周进行一次。PIPAC治疗的主要挑战之一仍然是治疗反应的客观评估。本研究描述了一种新的评分系统,用于组织学评估PIPAC治疗后腹膜癌的消退。定量评估腹膜癌(QARP)的组织学消退。以标准化方式获得并处理了27例接受PIPAC的腹膜转移患者的腹膜活检。根据QARP分级系统对活检进行评分。五层系统分级如下,0级,无复发肿瘤细胞;1级,每个肿瘤病灶1-25%的活肿瘤细胞存在消退变化;2级,每个肿瘤病灶26-50%的活肿瘤细胞存在消退变化;3级,每个肿瘤病灶51-75%的活肿瘤细胞几乎没有消退变化;4级,每个肿瘤病灶>75%的活肿瘤细胞,最小或没有消退变化。基于新的分级制度,本研究队列分为QARP应答者和PIPAC治疗后QARP非应答者.较高的QARP评分与较高的PCI评分显著相关(r=0.32;P=0.007)。然而,QARP应答者和无应答者的总生存期没有差异.需要进一步的研究来确定QARP的可重复性和预后意义。
    Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of the leading causes of death in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Newer locoregional treatment concepts include pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), the regional application of pressurized chemotherapeutic agents to the abdominal cavity, which is usually performed every 4 to 8 weeks. One of the main challenges of PIPAC therapy remains the objective assessment of treatment response. The present study describes a new scoring system to histologically assess the regression of peritoneal cancer following PIPAC therapy, quantitative assessment of histological regression in peritoneal carcinomatosis (QARP). Peritoneal biopsies from 27 patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing PIPAC were obtained and processed in a standardized fashion. Biopsies were scored according to the QARP grading system. The five-tiered system was graded as follows, Grade 0, no residual tumor cells with regressive changes present; grade 1, 1-25% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with regressive changes present; grade 2, 26-50% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with regressive changes present; grade 3, 51-75% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with few regressive changes; grade 4, >75% viable tumor cells per tumor focus with minimal or no regressive changes. Based on the new grading system, the study cohort was divided into QARP responders and QARP non-responders following PIPAC treatment. Higher QARP scores were significantly correlated with higher PCI scores (r=0.32; P=0.007). However, no difference in overall survival was detected between QARP responders and QARP non-responders. Further studies are required to ascertain the reproducibility and prognostic significance of QARP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹膜癌(PC)引起的恶性肠梗阻(MBO)与不良预后相关。缓解的最佳管理仍不清楚。这项研究旨在描述非手术,程序,以及MBO的手术管理策略,并评估其与死亡率和成本的关系。材料和方法:ICD-10编码确定了2018年至2019年全国住院患者样本(NIS)的MBO和来自胃肠道或卵巢原发性癌症的PC。管理被归类为非手术,程序,或外科手术。多因素分析用于将治疗与死亡率和费用相关联。结果:确定了356,316名患者入院,平均年龄63岁。性别,种族,各组之间的保险状况相似。手术组住院时间(LOS)最长(手术:17天;手术:14天;非手术:7天;P=0.001)。与非手术相比,手术和手术患者的住院费用在统计上较高,出院后的医疗需求,姑息治疗咨询,进入康复中心。非手术死亡率为7%,9%的程序,手术组为8%(P=0.007)。在调整后的分析中,年龄较大,姑息治疗咨询,非医疗保险支付者状态与较高的死亡率相关.与非手术相比,手术和手术组导致成本增加(手术:多$17K;手术:多$30K)。结论:MBO的手术和手术治疗与LOS增加有关,医院费用,和放电需求。优化管理仍然具有挑战性。鉴于资源利用率和死亡率上升的趋势,临床医生必须在推荐姑息干预措施之前检查所有选择。
    Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) due to peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is associated with poor outcomes. Optimal management for palliation remains unclear. This study aims to characterize nonoperative, procedural, and operative management strategies for MBO and evaluate its association with mortality and cost.Materials and Methods: ICD-10 coding identified patient admissions from the 2018 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for MBO with PC from gastrointestinal or ovarian primary cancers. Management was categorized as nonoperative, procedural, or surgical. Multivariate analysis was used to associate treatment with mortality and cost.Results: 356,316 patient admissions were identified, with a mean age of 63 years. Gender, race, and insurance status were similar among groups. Length of stay (LOS) was longest in the surgical group (surgical: 17 days; procedural: 14 days; nonoperative: 7 days; P = .001). In comparison to nonoperative, procedural and surgical patients had statistically higher hospital charges, post-discharge medical needs, palliative care consults, and admission to rehab centers. Mortality was 7% in nonoperative, 9% in procedural, and 8% in surgical (P = .007) groups. In adjusted analyses, older age, palliative care consult, and non-Medicare payer status were associated with higher mortality. Compared to nonoperative, procedural and surgical groups resulted in increased costs (procedural: $17K more; surgical: $30K more).Conclusions: Admissions for procedural and surgical treatment of MBO are associated with increased LOS, hospital costs, and discharge needs. Optimal management remains challenging. Clinicians must examine all options prior to recommending palliative interventions given a trend towards higher resource utilization and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:腹腔镜分期对胃癌(GC)排除腹膜转移(PM)至关重要。金丝桃素,一种植物来源的荧光化合物,已建议提高GC对PM的腹腔镜可视化。这个未来,单臂,开放标签临床试验旨在评估口服金丝桃素的可行性和安全性以及荧光引导腹腔镜检查(FGL)对提高GC患者分期敏感性和特异性的适用性(EudraCT-Number:2015-005277-21;clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT-02840331).(2)方法:GC患者接受Laif®900,一种批准的含金丝桃素的植物药物,一次口服2至4小时前的白光和紫外光腹腔镜检查。评估腹膜癌指数,通过质谱测定活检以及血清和腹膜组织中的金丝桃素浓度。(3)结果:在2017年至2021年之间,在63名筛选合格的患者中,50名患者被纳入并按照方案进行治疗。研究表明,干预措施对所有患者都是可行和安全的。标准腹腔镜检查发现27例患者(54%)有可疑病变,其中16人(59%)被诊断为PM。FGL在25名患者(50%)中发现了可疑区域,其中13例(52%)确认PM。尽管血清中的金丝桃素浓度高达5.64ng/mL,在腹膜组织活检中未检测到金丝桃素.(4)结论:在本研究中,GC患者的FGL是可行的,但徒劳无功。在用金丝桃素重新评估FGL之前,应确保靶组织中金丝桃素的足够水平。
    (1) Background: Laparoscopic staging is essential in gastric cancer (GC) to rule out peritoneal metastasis (PM). Hypericin, a plant-derived fluorescent compound, has been suggested to improve laparoscopic visualization of PM from GC. This prospective, single-arm, open-label clinical trial aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of oral hypericin administration as well as the suitability of fluorescence-guided laparoscopy (FGL) for improving the sensitivity and specificity of staging in GC patients (EudraCT-Number: 2015-005277-21; clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT-02840331). (2) Methods: GC patients received Laif® 900, an approved hypericin-containing phytopharmaceutical, once orally two to four hours before white light and ultraviolet light laparoscopy. The peritoneal cancer index was evaluated, biopsies taken and hypericin concentrations in serum and peritoneal tissue were determined by mass spectrometry. (3) Results: Between 2017 and 2021, out of 63 patients screened for eligibility, 50 patients were enrolled and treated per protocol. The study intervention was shown to be feasible and safe in all patients. Standard laparoscopy revealed suspicious lesions in 27 patients (54%), among whom 16 (59%) were diagnosed with PM. FGL identified suspicious areas in 25 patients (50%), among whom PM was confirmed in 13 cases (52%). Although hypericin concentrations in serum reached up to 5.64 ng/mL, no hypericin was detectable in peritoneal tissue biopsies. (4) Conclusions: FGL in patients with GC was shown to be feasible but futile in this study. Sufficient levels of hypericin should be ensured in target tissue prior to reassessing FGL with hypericin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们开发了一种新型的药物递送系统,称为高温腹膜内加压气雾剂化疗(HPIPAC),该系统将高温腹膜内化疗(HIPEC)和加压腹膜内气雾剂化疗(PIPAC)杂交。本研究旨在评估HPIPAC系统在大型动物生存模型中的可行性和安全性。
    方法:实验中使用11只猪(8种非生存模型和3种生存模型)。HPIPAC控制器中的加热模块使高温CO2在闭环回路中循环,并产生基于气体的干燥腹膜内热疗。将三个12mm套管针放置在腹部上。将缠绕有发热线圈的传入CO2管插入套管针中,输出管被插入另一个套管针。将加热的CO2吹入并在闭合回路中循环,直到腹内和腹膜表面温度达到42°C。将100ml的5%葡萄糖水溶液雾化5分钟,并在42℃下恢复闭环循环60分钟。从存活模型中的猪的几个部位进行组织活检。
    结果:猪的核心温度的平均变化为2.5±0.08°C。所有三只猪都没有表现出痛苦的迹象,他们的生命体征保持稳定,他们的饮食没有变化。在尸检中,在活检部位观察到炎症和纤维化反应,无严重的病理结果.
    结论:我们成功地证明了我们的新型HPIPAC系统在体内猪存活模型中的可行性和安全性。
    BACKGROUND: We developed a novel drug delivery system called hyperthermic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (HPIPAC) that hybridized Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). The present study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of HPIPAC system in a large animal survival model.
    METHODS: Eleven pigs (eight non-survival models and three survival models) were used in the experiment. The heat module in the HPIPAC controller circulates hyperthermic CO2 in a closed-loop circuit and creates gas-based dry intraperitoneal hyperthermia. Three 12 mm trocars were placed on the abdomen. The afferent CO2 tube wound with heat generating coil was inserted into a trocar, and the efferent tube was inserted into another trocar. Heated CO2 was insufflated and circulated in a closed circuit until the intra-abdominal and peritoneal surface temperature reached 42 °C. 100 ml of 5% dextrose in water was nebulized for 5 min and the closed-loop circulation was resumed for 60 min at 42 °C. Tissue biopsies were taken from several sites from the pigs in the survival model.
    RESULTS: The average change in core temperature of the pigs was 2.5 ± 0.08 °C. All three pigs displayed no signs of distress, and their vital signs remained stable, with no changes in their diet. In autopsy, inflammatory and fibrotic responses at the biopsy sites were observed without serious pathologic findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: We successfully proved the feasibility and safety of our novel HPIPAC system in an in-vivo swine survival model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在研究加压腹膜内雾化化疗(PIPAC)在卵巢癌和腹膜癌铂耐药复发中的疗效和安全性,而我们的次要终点是确定通过EORTCQLQ-30和QLQ-OV28问卷估计的生活质量的任何变化.
    方法:在这个单中心,单臂,第二阶段试验,前瞻性招募女性患者,每28~42天接受一次PIPAC疗程,即通过序贯腹腔镜检查给予阿霉素2.1mg/m2,然后给予顺铂10.5mg/m2.
    结果:总体而言,从2016年1月至2020年1月,对43名妇女进行了98次PIPAC手术;由于广泛的腹腔内粘连,3次手术流产。82%的女性达到了临床获益率(CBR)。18名妇女(45%)完成了三个PIPAC周期,13例(32.5%)和9例(22.5%)患者接受了一个和两个周期,分别。在两个PIPAC程序中,患者出现术中肠穿孔。没有治疗相关的死亡。根据腹膜回归评分(PRGS),19例患者无应答,8例患者根据PRGS显示轻微应答。从卵巢癌复发到疾病进展的中位时间为12个月(95%置信区间[CI]6.483-17.517)。而中位总生存期为27个月(95%CI20.337-33.663).EORTCQLQ-28和EORTCQLQ-30评分在治疗期间没有恶化。
    结论:PIPAC似乎是治疗这一部分患者的可行方法,对他们的生活质量没有任何影响。由于本研究样本量小,单中心设计,未来的研究是强制性的,如它的应用除了全身化疗。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in platinum-resistant recurrence of ovarian cancer and peritoneal carcinomatosis, while our secondary endpoint was to establish any changes in quality of life estimated via the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-OV28 questionnaires.
    METHODS: In this monocentric, single-arm, phase II trial, women were prospectively recruited and every 28-42 days underwent courses of PIPAC with doxorubicin 2.1 mg/m2 followed by cisplatin 10.5 mg/m2 via sequential laparoscopy.
    RESULTS: Overall, 98 PIPAC procedures were performed on 43 women from January 2016 to January 2020; three procedures were aborted due to extensive intra-abdominal adhesions. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was reached in 82% of women. Three cycles of PIPAC were completed in 18 women (45%), and 13 (32.5%) and 9 (22.5%) patients were subjected to one and two cycles, respectively. During two PIPAC procedures, patients experienced an intraoperative intestinal perforation. There were no treatment-related deaths. Nineteen patients showed no response according to the Peritoneal Regression Grading Score (PRGS) and 8 patients showed minor response according to the PRGS. Median time from ovarian cancer relapse to disease progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.483-17.517), while the median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI 20.337-33.663). The EORTC QLQ-28 and EORTC QLQ-30 scores did not worsen during therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: PIPAC seems a feasible approach for the treatment of this subset of patients, without any impact on their quality of life. Since this study had a small sample size and a single-center design, future research is mandatory, such as its application in addition to systemic chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Cytoreductive surgery (CRS), combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, has significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib is an oral agent administered in patients with refractory metastatic CRC. Our aim was to investigate the outcomes of intraperitoneal administration of regorafenib for intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPEC) or/and CRS in a rat model of colorectal peritoneal metastases regarding immunology and peritoneal cytology. A total of 24 rats were included. Twenty-eight days after carcinogenesis induction, rats were randomized into following groups: group A: control group; group B: CRS only; group C: IPEC only; and group D: CRS + IPEC. On day 56 after carcinogenesis, euthanasia and laparotomy were performed. Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) as well as peritoneal cytology were investigated. Groups B and D had statistically significant lower mean levels of IL-6 and TNF-α compared to groups A and C, but there was no significant difference between them. Both B and D groups presented a statistically significant difference regarding the rate of negative peritoneal cytology, when compared to the control group, but not to group C. In conclusion, regorafenib-based IPEC, combined with CRS, may constitute a promising tool against peritoneal carcinomatosis by altering the tumor microenvironment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:来自结直肠癌(CRC)的腹膜癌(PC)是一种极具挑战性的疾病。系统性嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞在血液恶性肿瘤中显示出令人印象深刻的功效,但在实体瘤中效果较差。我们探索了CART细胞的腹膜内(i.p.)施用是否可以为来自CRC的PC提供有效且稳健的治疗途径。
    方法:我们产生了第二代癌胚抗原(CEA)特异性CAR-T细胞。通过i.p.或静脉内(i.v.)施用CECART细胞来治疗具有i.p.和腹膜外转移的PC的各种动物模型。
    结果:在PC的动物模型中,与全身静脉内细胞输注相比,腹膜内施用的CART细胞表现出优异的抗肿瘤活性。此外,i.p.给药赋予持久的效果和对肿瘤复发的保护作用,并在PC的动物模型中表现出强的抗肿瘤活性,并在i.p.或腹膜外器官转移。此外,与全身递送相比,CART细胞的i.p.转移在没有PC的腹膜外肿瘤中提供了增加的抗肿瘤活性。在腹膜内施用我们新构建的前列腺干细胞抗原定向的CART细胞后,在胰腺癌的动物模型中进一步证实了这种现象。
    结论:综合来看,我们的数据表明,CAR-T细胞的腹膜内给药可能是有效治疗癌症的稳健递送途径.
    Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly challenging disease to treat. Systemic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have shown impressive efficacy in hematologic malignancies but have been less effective in solid tumors. We explored whether intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of CAR T cells could provide an effective and robust route of treatment for PC from CRC.
    We generated second-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific CAR T cells. Various animal models of PC with i.p. and extraperitoneal metastasis were treated by i.p. or intravenous (i.v.) administration of CEA CAR T cells.
    Intraperitoneally administered CAR T cells exhibited superior anti-tumor activity compared with systemic i.v. cell infusion in an animal model of PC. In addition, i.p. administration conferred a durable effect and protection against tumor recurrence and exerted strong anti-tumor activity in an animal model of PC with metastasis in i.p. or extraperitoneal organs. Moreover, compared with systemic delivery, i.p. transfer of CAR T cells provided increased anti-tumor activity in extraperitoneal tumors without PC. This phenomenon was further confirmed in an animal model of pancreatic carcinoma after i.p. administration of our newly constructed prostate stem cell antigen-directed CAR T cells.
    Taken together, our data suggest that i.p. administration of CAR T cells may be a robust delivery route for effective treatment of cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹膜癌(PC)和腹膜结核(PTB)具有相似的临床和影像学特征,这使得临床上很难区分这两个实体。我们的目的是确定PC患者的网膜病变的CT纹理参数是否与PTB患者不同。
    方法:2010年1月至2018年12月在我们机构接受网膜活检且组织诊断为PC或PTB的所有患者均可纳入。排除在大网膜活检后一个月内未进行对比增强CT腹部检查的患者。在网膜病变上手动绘制感兴趣区域(ROI),并使用开源LIFEx软件提取影像组学特征。进行统计学分析以比较PC组和PTB组之间CT纹理参数的平均差异。
    结果:本研究共纳入66例患者,其中38例和28例患有PC和PTB,分别。PC患者的Omental病变具有较高的平均放射密度(平均差异:32.4;p=0.001),较高的平均熵(平均差:+0.11;p<0.001),与PTB相比,平均能量较低(平均差:-0.024;p=0.001)。此外,与PTB组相比,PC组的网膜病变具有较低的灰度共生矩阵(GLCM)同质性(平均差:-0.073;p<0.001)和较高的GLCM相异性(平均差:0.480;p<0.001)。
    结论:PTB患者和PC患者的网膜病变的CT纹理参数有显著差异,这可能有助于临床医生区分这两个实体。
    Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and peritoneal tuberculosis (PTB) have similar clinical and radiologic imaging features, which make it very difficult to differentiate between the two entities clinically. Our aim was to determine if the CT textural parameters of omental lesions among patients with PC were different from those with PTB.
    All patients who had undergone omental biopsy at our institution from January 2010 to December 2018 and had a tissue diagnosis of PC or PTB were eligible for inclusion. Patients who did not have a contrast-enhanced CT abdomen within one month of the omental biopsy were excluded. A region of interest (ROI) was manually drawn over omental lesions and radiomic features were extracted using open-source LIFEx software. Statistical analysis was performed to compare mean differences in CT texture parameters between the PC and PTB groups.
    A total of 66 patients were included in the study of which 38 and 28 had PC and PTB, respectively. Omental lesions in patients with PC had higher mean radiodensity (mean difference: +32.4; p = 0.001), higher mean entropy (mean difference: +0.11; p < 0.001), and lower mean energy (mean difference: -0.024; p = 0.001) compared to those in PTB. Additionally, omental lesions in the PC group had lower gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) homogeneity (mean difference: -0.073; p < 0.001) and higher GLCM dissimilarity (mean difference: +0.480; p < 0.001) as compared to the PTB group.
    CT texture parameters of omental lesions differed significantly between patients with PTB and those with PC, which may help clinicians in differentiating between the two entities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用腹腔镜方法治疗上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)的癌变是有争议的。这项研究的目的是比较腹腔镜和开放方法在晚期EOC患者的匹配队列中用于间隔CRSHIPEC的短期结果。
    方法:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,该数据库包括2016年1月至2021年12月期间接受间隔CRS-HIPEC治疗的254例患者。选择患有原发性疾病和局限性癌(PCI≤10)的患者。对通过开放(O-CRS-HIPEC)或腹腔镜(L-CRS-HIPEC)方法治疗的患者进行了比较分析。总生存期(OS),无病生存率(DFS),分析围手术期结局。
    结果:在这项研究中,最终选择了53名患者,并将其纳入两个相当的组。其中,14例患者采用区间L-CRS-HIPEC治疗,39例患者采用区间O-CRS-HIPEC治疗。L-CRS-HIPEC组住院时间较短(5.6±1.9vs.9.7±9.8天;p<0.001)和更短的时间恢复全身化疗(4.3±1.9vs.10.3±16.8周;p=0.003)。两组术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义。L-CRS-HIPEC组的2年OS和DFS分别为100%和62%,而O-CRS-HIPEC组为92%和60%,分别为(p=0.96;p=0.786)。
    结论:这项研究表明,与开放方法相比,使用间隔L-CRS-HIPEC治疗原发性晚期EOC可缩短住院时间并恢复全身治疗,同时获得相似的肿瘤结果。需要进一步的前瞻性研究为这些严格选择的患者推荐这种新方法。
    The use of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of carcinomatosis from epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of both laparoscopic and open approach for interval CRS+HIPEC in a matched cohort of patients with advanced EOC.
    A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database including 254 patients treated with interval CRS-HIPEC between January 2016 and December 2021 was performed. Patients with primary disease and limited carcinomatosis (PCI ≤ 10) were selected. A comparative analysis of patients treated by either open (O-CRS-HIPEC) or the laparoscopic (L-CRS-HIPEC) approach was conducted. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and perioperative outcomes were analysed.
    Fifty-three patients were finally selected and enrolled into two comparable groups in this study. Of these, 14 patients were treated by interval L-CRS-HIPEC and 39 by interval O-CRS-HIPEC. The L-CRS-HIPEC group had a shorter hospital stay (5.6 ± 1.9 vs. 9.7 ± 9.8 days; p < 0.001) and a shorter time to return to systemic chemotherapy (4.3 ± 1.9 vs. 10.3 ± 16.8 weeks; p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between both groups. The 2-year OS and DFS was 100% and 62% in the L-CRS-HIPEC group versus 92% and 60% in the O-CRS-HIPEC group, respectively (p = 0.96; p = 0.786).
    This study suggests that the use of interval L-CRS-HIPEC for primary advanced EOC is associated with shorter hospital stay and return to systemic treatment while obtaining similar oncological results compared to the open approach. Further prospective research is needed to recommend this new approach for these strictly selected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号