interventions

干预措施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:十年前发表了关于社区居住体弱老年人非正式照顾者干预措施的系统评价,他们误认为虚弱是其他严重的与年龄相关的疾病,如残疾和痴呆。因此,本研究旨在系统地综合由公认的虚弱评估工具确定的这些支持护理人员的干预措施,并检查其对护理人员相关结局的有效性.
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:十四个电子数据库,我们系统地检索了从开始到2023年11月3日的随机对照试验(RCTs)和非随机对照试验(NRCTs)的灰色文献和参考文献列表.
    方法:评估方法学质量和偏倚风险。使用综合荟萃分析对数据进行荟萃分析,3.0版。不适合荟萃分析的研究和结果通过叙述性综合进行总结。
    结果:纳入了由3项RCT和1项NRCT组成的4项研究,涉及350名参与者。对体弱老年人照顾者的干预包括多成分干预(n=3)和教育干预(n=1)。干预对降低抑郁有中等效果,对照顾者负担无显著影响。护理时间或生活质量(QoL)。RCT的PEDro评分从6到8,表明良好的方法学质量,但都被判断为偏见的高风险。NRCT报告了所有方法学方面,偏倚风险较低。
    结论:很少有研究关注针对体弱老年人照顾者的干预措施。它们的有效性可能因结果而异。这篇综述提出了这些干预措施在减少护理人员抑郁方面的潜在益处。
    结论:研究结果的不同有效性和高偏倚风险暗示需要更严格的研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Systematic reviews on interventions for informal caregivers of community-dwelling frail older adults were published over a decade ago and they mistook frailty for other severe age-related conditions like disability and dementia. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically synthesize these interventions supporting these caregivers identified by an acknowledged frailty assessment instrument and to examine their effectiveness on caregiver-related outcomes.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Fourteen electronic databases, grey literature and reference lists were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) from inception to November 3, 2023.
    METHODS: Methodology quality and risk of bias were assessed. Data were meta-analysed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 3.0. Studies and outcomes unsuitable for meta-analysis were summarized by narrative syntheses.
    RESULTS: Four studies consisting of three RCTs and one NRCT were included involving 350 participants. Interventions for caregivers of frail older adults included multicomponent interventions (n = 3) and education intervention (n = 1). Interventions had a moderate effect on reducing depression and showed nonsignificant effects on caregiver burden, caregiving time or quality of life (QoL). The PEDro scores for RCTs ranged from 6 to 8, indicating good methodologic quality, but were all judged as high risk of bias. The NRCT reported all methodologic aspects and was at low risk of bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: Few studies focus on interventions targeting caregivers of frail older adults, and their effectiveness may vary by outcomes. This review suggested the potential benefits of these interventions in reducing caregivers\' depression.
    CONCLUSIONS: The differential effectiveness by outcomes and high risk of bias of studies implicate that more rigorous studies are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管疫苗接种取得了进展,在帮助低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的数百万儿童方面仍然存在一些挑战。在这次审查中,我们广泛总结了用于改善LMIC常规免疫的各种策略,以帮助计划实施者设计疫苗接种干预措施.
    在LMICs中进行的实验性和准实验性影响评估,评估干预措施在改善0-5岁儿童常规免疫接种方面的有效性或中间结果,包括在3ie的系统评价中。还包括近年来在有大量未接种疫苗的儿童的选定LMICs中发表的一些其他影响评估研究。使用3ie的证据差距图和WHO的疫苗接种框架的行为和社会驱动因素(BeSD)开发的干预框架,对研究背景下的干预措施和障碍进行编码,分别。对内容进行了定性分析,以分析干预策略及其解决的疫苗接种障碍。
    纳入了一百四十二项影响评估,以总结干预措施。解决疫苗接种的态度和知识相关障碍,并激励护理人员,宣传和教育计划,媒体宣传活动,以及对护理人员的货币或非货币激励,可能或不可能以某些健康行为为条件,已在上下文中使用。提高疫苗接种知识,它的地方,时间,和时间表,自动语音消息和书面或图片消息已被用作独立或多组件策略。用于提高服务质量的干预措施包括对卫生工作者进行培训和教育,并向他们提供货币或非货币津贴,或就提供疫苗接种服务的不同方面向他们发送提醒。干预措施,如有效的计划或外展活动,儿童的后续行动,跟踪错过疫苗接种的儿童,还使用了按绩效付费计划和加强卫生系统来改善服务的获取和质量。旨在动员和与社区合作以影响社会规范的干预措施,态度,并授权社区做出健康决策也得到了广泛实施。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the advances in vaccination, there are still several challenges in reaching millions of children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this review, we present an extensive summary of the various strategies used for improving routine immunization in LMICs to aid program implementers in designing vaccination interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: Experimental and quasi-experimental impact evaluations conducted in LMICs evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in improving routine immunization of children aged 0-5 years or the intermediate outcomes were included from 3ie\'s review of systematic reviews. Some additional impact evaluation studies published in recent years in select LMICs with large number of unvaccinated children were also included. Studies were coded to identify interventions and the barriers in the study context using the intervention framework developed in 3ie\'s Evidence Gap Map and the WHO\'s Behavioral and Social Drivers (BeSD) of vaccination framework, respectively. Qualitative analysis of the content was conducted to analyze the intervention strategies and the vaccination barriers that they addressed.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred and forty-two impact evaluations were included to summarize the interventions. To address attitudinal and knowledge related barriers to vaccination and to motivate caregivers, sensitization and educational programs, media campaigns, and monetary or non-monetary incentives to caregivers, that may or may not be conditional upon certain health behaviors, have been used across contexts. To improve knowledge of vaccination, its place, time, and schedule, automated voice messages and written or pictorial messages have been used as standalone or multicomponent strategies. Interventions used to improve service quality included training and education of health workers and providing monetary or non-monetary perks to them or sending reminders to them on different aspects of provision of vaccination services. Interventions like effective planning or outreach activities, follow-up of children, tracking of children that have missed vaccinations, pay-for-performance schemes and health system strengthening have also been used to improve service access and quality. Interventions aimed at mobilizing and collaborating with the community to impact social norms, attitudes, and empower communities to make health decisions have also been widely implemented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景护理点超声(POCUS)对许多经验丰富的急诊医生具有破坏性,因为它需要具备新的物理技能,实时图像解释,和导航的新软件提交到电子健康记录(EHR)。用于临床决策的已执行POCUS研究的不完整文档代表了潜在的法医学责任,可能会使患者暴露于重复或潜在不必要的成像,这是一个错失的报销机会。确定EDPOCUS文档完成的有效促进者需要额外的调查。方法在本混合方法研究的第一部分,根据最近的POCUS文档表现,将符合条件的主治医师分层为使用水平(\"高\"/\"低\"/\"从不\").对高利用率和低利用率进行了半结构化访谈,以探讨他们对POCUS提交工作流程的看法以及对各种拟议干预措施的接受度。使用探讨感知有用性和可用性的主题分析对定性数据进行了分析。研究的第二部分包括两个干预阶段。首先,达到最低POCUS文件数量的医师获得额外的轮班安排灵活性奖励.在第二阶段,获得最多采访支持的干预,每日文档提醒电子邮件,已实施。主要结果是按提交的所有研究除以每月进行的所有研究(提交加上未提交)计算的个人POCUS记录率。提供商级别的月度数据汇总为部门费率。结果对12名医师进行了访谈,最高的六个,最低的文档四分位数的六个。两组都支持相同的两项干预措施:提醒电子邮件排名第一,然后货币奖励排名第二。高利用率强调POCUS的临床实用性,而低使用率的人对“双重计费”和暴露于不确定的扫描解释的法医学责任表示担忧。对于低利用率者,文件的决定可能取决于执行住院医师显示的信心。两组人都对使用单独的程序感到沮丧,Qpath(TelexyHealthcare,Inc,枫树岭,不列颠哥伦比亚省,加拿大),用于POCUS文档。在干预第一阶段,随着时间表要求激励措施的引入,部门文件总数从44.6%增加到60.1%。在所有文档四分位数中都可以看到这种改进。在干预第二阶段增加了每日文档提醒电子邮件后,部门比率保持稳定,没有进一步改善。当提醒电子邮件停止但休息日请求激励仍在继续时,部门费率没有下降。结论实施非财务班次调度激励措施与部门POCUS文档率的最大增长相关。受访者错误地预测,电子邮件提醒将是最有影响力的干预措施,突显了医生的感知与行为改变的有效驱动因素之间的不匹配。进一步的调查可能侧重于确定时间表请求激励的孤立影响的大小和寿命,正如人们可能期望的那样,边际效用递减。
    Background Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been disruptive to many experienced emergency physicians as it requires competence in a new physical skill, real-time image interpretation, and navigation of novel software for submission to the electronic health record (EHR). Incomplete documentation of a performed POCUS study used for clinical decision-making represents a potential medicolegal liability, may expose the patient to repetitive or potentially unnecessary imaging, and is a missed opportunity for reimbursement. Identifying effective facilitators of ED POCUS documentation completion requires additional investigation. Methods In the first part of this mixed-methods study, eligible attending physicians were stratified into levels of use (\"high\"/\"low\"/\"never\") based on recent POCUS documentation performance. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with high and low utilizers to explore their perceptions of the POCUS submission workflow and their receptivity to various proposed interventions. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis that explored perceived usefulness and usability. The second part of the study consisted of two intervention phases. First, physicians achieving minimum POCUS documentation numbers were rewarded with additional shift scheduling flexibility. In the second phase, the intervention that garnered the most interview support, daily documentation reminder emails, was implemented. The primary outcome was the individual POCUS documentation rates calculated as all studies submitted divided by all studies performed (submitted plus unsubmitted) per month. Provider-level monthly data was aggregated into a departmental rate. Results Interviews were conducted with 12 physicians, six from the highest and six from the lowest documentation quartiles. Both groups supported the same two proposed interventions: reminder emails ranked first, then monetary rewards ranked second. High utilizers emphasized the clinical utility of POCUS, whereas low utilizers expressed concerns over \"double billing\" and exposure to medicolegal liability with uncertain scan interpretations. For low utilizers, a documentation decision could be dependent on the performing resident physician\'s displayed confidence. Both groups voiced frustration with the need to use a separate program, Qpath (Telexy Healthcare, Inc, Maple Ridge, British Columbia, Canada), for POCUS documentation. During intervention phase one, the aggregate departmental documentation rate increased from 44.6% to 60.1% with the introduction of the schedule request incentive. This improvement was seen across all documentation quartiles. The departmental rate remained stable and did not improve further following the addition of the daily documentation reminder emails in intervention phase two. When reminder emails ceased yet the day-off request incentive continued, the departmental rate did not drop. Conclusions The implementation of a non-financial shift scheduling incentive correlated with the largest increase in departmental POCUS documentation rate. Interviewees incorrectly predicted that email reminders would be the most influential intervention highlighting a mismatch between physician perception and effective drivers of behavior change. Further investigation may focus on determining the size and longevity of the isolated impact of a schedule request incentive, as one might expect diminishing marginal utility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经过数十年的吡喹酮大规模给药(MDA),几个国家接近消除血吸虫病。在大部分未感染的人群中继续使用MDA似乎不再合理。需要采取替代干预措施来维持增益或加速传输中断。我们报告结果,优势,以及奔巴血吸虫低流行地区新型测试-治疗-追踪-测试-治疗(5T)干预措施的缺点,坦桑尼亚。
    方法:在2021年和2022年进行了基于学校和家庭的调查,以监测血链球菌和微血尿的患病率,并评估干预措施的影响。2021年,在15个低流行地区实施了5T干预措施,包括:(i)对小学和伊斯兰学校的学童进行微血尿测试,以代替血吸虫,(ii)治疗积极的儿童,(iii)将他们追踪到他们经常光顾的家庭和水体,(iv)在家庭和水体中测试个人,和(V)治疗阳性个体。此外,试验和治疗干预措施在研究区域的22个医疗机构实施.
    结果:在以学校为基础的15个低患病率实施单位的调查中,2021年和2022年分别为0.5%(7/1560)和0.4%(6/1645)。在以家庭为基础的调查中,在2021年和2022年,分别有0.5%(14/2975)和0.7%(19/2920)的参与者感染了S。微血尿患病率,不包括跟踪结果,在以学校为基础的调查中,2021年为1.4%(21/1560),2022年为1.5%(24/1645)。在以家庭为基础的调查中,2021年为3.3%(98/2975),2022年为5.4%(159/2920)。在5T干预期间,在小学和伊斯兰学校的儿童中,微血尿患病率分别为3.8%(140/3700)和5.8%(34/594),分别,家庭成员占17.1%(44/258),水体中的人占16.7%(10/60)。在卫生设施中,19.8%(70/354)的患者检测微血尿阳性。
    结论:有针对性的5T干预措施维持了极低的血吸虫流行率,并且被证明可以直接和可行地识别和治疗少数血吸虫感染的个体。未来的研究将显示5T干预措施是否可以长期维持收益并加快消除。
    背景:ISRCTN,ISCRCTN91431493。2020年2月11日注册,https://www。isrctn.com/ISRCTN91431493.
    BACKGROUND: After decades of praziquantel mass drug administration (MDA), several countries approach schistosomiasis elimination. Continuing MDA in largely uninfected populations no longer seems justified. Alternative interventions to maintain the gains or accelerate interruption of transmission are needed. We report results, strengths, and shortcomings of novel test-treat-track-test-treat (5T) interventions in low Schistosoma haematobium prevalence areas on Pemba, Tanzania.
    METHODS: School- and household-based surveys were conducted in 2021 and 2022 to monitor the S. haematobium and microhematuria prevalence and assess the impact of interventions. In 2021, 5T interventions were implemented in 15 low-prevalence areas and included: (i) testing schoolchildren in primary and Islamic schools for microhematuria as a proxy for S. haematobium, (ii) treating positive children, (iii) tracking them to their households and to water bodies they frequented, (iv) testing individuals at households and water bodies, and (v) treating positive individuals. Additionally, test-and-treat interventions were implemented in the 22 health facilities of the study area.
    RESULTS: The S. haematobium prevalence in the school-based survey in 15 low-prevalence implementation units was 0.5% (7/1560) in 2021 and 0.4% (6/1645) in 2022. In the household-based survey, 0.5% (14/2975) and 0.7% (19/2920) of participants were infected with S. haematobium in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The microhematuria prevalence, excluding trace results, in the school-based survey was 1.4% (21/1560) in 2021 and 1.5% (24/1645) in 2022. In the household-based survey, it was 3.3% (98/2975) in 2021 and 5.4% (159/2920) in 2022. During the 5T interventions, the microhaematuria prevalence was 3.8% (140/3700) and 5.8% (34/594) in children in primary and Islamic schools, respectively, 17.1% (44/258) in household members, and 16.7% (10/60) in people at water bodies. In health facilities, 19.8% (70/354) of patients tested microhematuria-positive.
    CONCLUSIONS: The targeted 5T interventions maintained the very low S. haematobium prevalence and proved straightforward and feasible to identify and treat many of the few S. haematobium-infected individuals. Future research will show whether 5T interventions can maintain gains in the longer-term and expedite elimination.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN, ISCRCTN91431493. Registered 11 February 2020, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN91431493 .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们进行了系统评价,以评估2006年至2021年在非洲改善人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的干预措施的范围和有效性。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:四个数据库(Medline,Embase,搜索了CINAHL和PsycINFO)在2006年至2021年之间发表的文章。使用DistillerSR(2.35版)基于资格标准筛选并纳入文章。使用叙述性综合提取并报告数据。还使用经过验证的质量评估工具对每个研究进行质量评估。
    结果:在通过系统搜索确定的7603篇文章中,18条符合纳入标准。纳入的研究包括2012年至2021年发表的影响评估和横断面研究,在八个非洲国家进行,即:尼日利亚,喀麦隆,南非,肯尼亚,坦桑尼亚,赞比亚,马里,和马拉维。研究质量从高到低质量不等。干预措施包括15项教育干预措施和3项多组分干预措施。在13项影响评估研究(所有教育干预措施)中,12项研究有效增加HPV疫苗的摄取和/或提高参与者的知识,态度,以及对疫苗的看法。在五项横断面研究(两项教育和三项多成分干预)中,HPV疫苗的摄取率从34%到93.3%不等,67.9%-90.3%的参与者在干预后对安全性和有效性达成共识。
    结论:已经在非洲实施了教育和多组分干预措施以改善HPV疫苗接种。虽然教育干预已被证明可有效提高HPV疫苗的摄取,我们需要更多样化的干预措施以及稳健的影响评估研究设计,以加强现有证据并提高疫苗的接种.
    OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review to assess the scope and effectiveness of interventions to improve human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination in Africa from 2006 to 2021.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Four databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched for articles published between 2006 and 2021. Articles were screened and included based on eligibility criteria using DistillerSR (Version 2.35). Data were extracted and reported using a narrative synthesis. A quality assessment was also conducted for each study using validated quality appraisal tools.
    RESULTS: Out of 7603 articles identified by a systematic search, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria. Included studies comprised impact evaluation and cross-sectional studies published between 2012 and 2021 and conducted in eight African countries namely: Nigeria, Cameroon, South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Mali, and Malawi. Study quality ranged from high to low quality. Interventions comprised fifteen educational and three multicomponent interventions. Out of thirteen impact evaluation studies (all educational interventions), twelve studies were effective in increasing HPV vaccine uptake and/or improving participants\' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about the vaccine. Across five cross-sectional studies (two educational and three multicomponent interventions), HPV vaccine uptake rates ranged from 34% to 93.3%, with a consensus on safety and effectiveness in 67.9%-90.3% of participants post-intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Educational and multicomponent interventions have been implemented to improve HPV vaccination in Africa. While educational interventions have proven effective at improving HPV vaccine uptake, a more diverse range of interventions with robust impact evaluation study designs are needed to strengthen the available evidence and improve vaccine uptake.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:家庭暴力是导致孕期和产后健康状况不佳的主要原因。因此,在生殖保健环境中需要综合的家庭暴力干预措施。印度是孕产妇和儿童死亡率最高的国家之一。这项审查旨在确定印度现有的循证综合家庭暴力和生殖保健干预措施的特征,以确定证明有效解决家庭暴力的干预措施的差距和组成部分。
    方法:使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目对干预研究进行系统评价。三名研究小组成员进行了独立的标题筛选,摘要和全文。
    结果:搜索产生了633篇文章,其中13篇文章符合全文筛选和分析的纳入标准。有效解决家庭暴力的综合暴力和生殖健康干预措施的共同组成部分包括:心理教育/教育(n=5),技能建设(n=5),咨询(n=5),让利益相关者使用训练有素的外行同伴主持人(n=3),和男性配偶(n=3)。
    结论:在印度,将家庭暴力与生殖保健相结合的干预措施仍然很少,家庭暴力的有效结果较少。在那些有有效结果的人中,所有的干预措施都利用了心理教育/教育,技能建设,和咨询作为干预的一部分。
    家庭暴力是怀孕期间和怀孕后健康状况不佳的主要原因。因此,在生殖保健环境中需要综合的家庭暴力干预措施。印度是孕产妇和儿童死亡率最高的国家之一。这项审查旨在确定印度现有的循证综合家庭暴力和生殖保健干预措施的特征,以确定干预措施的差距和组成部分,这些差距和组成部分证明了解决生殖保健环境中妇女家庭暴力问题的有效性。对干预研究进行了系统评价。搜索产生了633篇文章,其中13篇文章符合本次审查的标准。有效的综合家庭暴力和生殖健康干预措施的共同组成部分包括:心理教育/教育(n=5),技能建设(n=5),咨询(n=5),让利益相关者使用训练有素的外行同伴主持人(n=3),和男性配偶(n=3)。主要的收获是,在印度,与生殖保健相结合的家庭暴力干预措施仍然很少,家庭暴力的有效结果较少。心理教育/教育,技能建设,和咨询是有效解决家庭暴力的干预措施中常用的策略。
    BACKGROUND: Domestic violence is a leading cause of poor health outcomes during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Therefore, there is a need for integrated domestic violence interventions in reproductive health care settings. India has one of the highest maternal and child mortality rates. This review aimed to identify characteristics of existing evidence-based integrated domestic violence and reproductive healthcare interventions in India to identify gaps and components of interventions that demonstrate effectiveness for addressing domestic violence.
    METHODS: A systematic review of intervention studies was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Three research team members performed independent screening of title, abstracts and full-texts.
    RESULTS: The search resulted in 633 articles, of which 13 articles met inclusion criteria for full text screening and analysis. Common components of integrated violence and reproductive health interventions that were effective in addressing domestic violence included: psychoeducation/education (n = 5), skill building (n = 5), counseling (n = 5), engaging stakeholders with use of trained lay peer facilitators (n = 3), and engaging male spouses (n = 3).
    CONCLUSIONS: Interventions in India for domestic violence that are integrated with reproductive health care remain few, and there are fewer with effective outcomes for domestic violence. Of those with effective outcomes, all of the interventions utilized psychoeducation/education, skill building, and counseling as part of the intervention.
    Domestic violence is a leading cause of poor health outcomes during pregnancy and the time after pregnancy. Thus, there is a need for integrated domestic violence interventions in reproductive healthcare settings. India has one of the highest maternal and child death rates. This review aimed to identify features of existing evidence-based integrated domestic violence and reproductive healthcare interventions in India to identify gaps and components of interventions that demonstrate effectiveness for addressing the problem of domestic violence among women in reproductive healthcare settings. A systematic review of intervention studies was conducted. The search resulted in 633 articles, of which 13 articles met the criteria to be included in this review. Common components of effective integrated domestic violence and reproductive health interventions included: psychoeducation/education (n = 5), skill building (n = 5), counseling (n = 5), engaging stakeholders with use of trained lay peer facilitators (n = 3), and engaging male spouses (n = 3). The key takeaways are that interventions in India for domestic violence that are integrated with reproductive healthcare remain few, and there are fewer with effective outcomes for domestic violence. Psychoeducation/education, skill building, and counseling were commonly used strategies in interventions that were effective in addressing domestic violence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:孤独和社会隔离与不良健康结局相关,特别是在老年人群中,强调需要有效的干预措施。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结有关孤独感和社会隔离干预措施有效性的所有可用证据。来规划他们的工作机制,并对政策和实践产生影响。
    方法:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:老年人(≥65岁)。
    方法:在MEDLINE中进行了系统搜索,PsycINFO,和CINAHL用于定量或定性评估老年人孤独感和社会隔离干预措施的影响的研究,遵循预定义的选择标准。评估了偏倚风险和微小的研究效果,在适当的地方,有关使用随机效应荟萃分析汇总的单个研究的效应大小的信息。研究间异质性的来源使用meta回归进行了探索。
    结果:在n=2223个确定的文章中,n=67最终被纳入叙事合成。在一定比例的研究中报告了显着的干预效果(孤独和社会孤立分别为55.9%和50.0%,分别)和包括随访措施(n=29)在内的57.6%的研究报告了持续的干预效果。n=27项研究的荟萃分析,代表n=1756名参与者,表明孤独感干预的总体效果中等(d=-0.47;95%CI,-0.62至-0.32)。研究之间的异质性很大,不能用研究设计的差异来解释,出版年份,结果衡量标准,干预长度,参与者人口统计,设置,孤独的基线水平,或地理位置。然而,非基于技术的干预报告平均效应大小较大(Δd=-0.35;95%CI,-0.66~-0.04;P=0.029),且通常更显著.对潜在干预机制的定性评估导致了3组有效组成部分:“促进社会接触,\"\"转移知识和技能,\"和\"解决社会认知\"。
    结论:对孤独和社会隔离的干预通常是有效的,尽管研究之间仍然存在一些无法解释的异质性。需要进一步研究干预措施在不同环境和国家的适用性,还考虑到它们的成本效益。
    OBJECTIVE: Loneliness and social isolation are associated with adverse health outcomes, especially within the elderly population, underlining the need for effective interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize all available evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions for loneliness and social isolation, to map out their working mechanisms, and to give implications for policy and practice.
    METHODS: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Older adults (≥65 years).
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies quantitively or qualitatively assessing effects of interventions for loneliness and social isolation in older adults, following predefined selection criteria. Risk of bias as well as small study effects were assessed and, wherever appropriate, information about effect sizes of individual studies pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Sources for between-study heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression.
    RESULTS: Of n = 2223 identified articles, n = 67 were eventually included for narrative synthesis. Significant intervention effects were reported for a proportion of studies (55.9% and 50.0% for loneliness and social isolation, respectively) and 57.6% of studies including a follow-up measure (n = 29) reported sustained intervention effects. Meta-analysis of n = 27 studies, representing n = 1756 participants, suggested a medium overall effect of loneliness interventions (d = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.32). Between-study heterogeneity was substantial and could not be explained by differences in study design, year of publication, outcome measures, intervention length, participant demographics, setting, baseline level of loneliness, or geographic location. However, non-technology-based interventions reported larger effect sizes on average (Δd = -0.35; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.04; P = .029) and were more often significant. Qualitative assessment of potential intervention mechanisms resulted in 3 clusters of effective components: \"promoting social contact,\" \"transferring knowledge and skills,\" and \"addressing social cognition\".
    CONCLUSIONS: Interventions for loneliness and social isolation can generally be effective, although some unexplained between-study heterogeneity remains. Further research is needed regarding the applicability of interventions across different settings and countries, also considering their cost-effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在许多欧洲国家,旨在最大程度地减少药物使用对健康和社会的影响的措施是国家毒品战略的组成部分。在经济发达国家大麻使用率高的背景下,以及对治疗大麻相关问题的需求不断增加,同行实施了一系列减少伤害的措施,法定机构和第三部门组织。在对文献进行系统回顾的基础上,作者描述了这些不同形式的干预,确定创新战略,并提出一种简单的类型学,可以在探索现有措施或寻求制定新政策时使用。这种类型涵盖了不同类型的法律,社会组织和健康相关干预措施。所有研究设计均符合纳入条件,除了病例报告,非系统评价,社论和新闻故事。研究必须在2011年至2022年之间以英文发表,他们不得不提到欧洲,美洲,澳大利亚或新西兰。使用Embase.com和许多其他数据库实现了两个概念的搜索,结合引文搜索和手动网站搜索,以提高研究报告和宣传文件的覆盖率。共有35份文件被视为符合资格,其中许多依赖于定性研究方法。
    Measures that seek to minimise the health and social consequences of substance use are an integral part of national drug strategies in many European countries. Against the backdrop of a high prevalence of cannabis use in the economically advanced countries, and increasing demand for treatment for cannabis-related problems, a range of harm reduction measures have been implemented by peers, statutory bodies and third-sector organisations. Based on a systematic review of the literature, the author describes these different forms of intervention, identifies innovative strategies and presents a simple typology that can be used when exploring existing measures or seeking to develop new policies. This typology covers different kinds of legal, socio-organisational and health-related interventions. All study designs were eligible for inclusion, with the exception of case reports, non-systematic reviews, editorials and news stories. Studies had to be published between 2011 and 2022, in English, and they had to refer to Europe, the Americas, Australia or New Zealand. A two-concept search was implemented using Embase.com and a number of other databases, combined with citation searches and manual website searching to improve coverage of research reports and advocacy documents. A total of 35 documents were deemed eligible, many of which rely on qualitative research methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大学生使用大麻代表了一个持续的公共卫生问题。目的是评估违反大学药物使用政策的学生使用大麻的风险因素和原因,以及风险因素是否影响大麻使用量。
    这项横断面调查研究包括在美国一所大型公立大学注册的99名大学生。计算了描述性统计数据,并进行了普通最小二乘回归分析。
    学生报告说,过去一个月平均使用大麻7.4天(SD=10.2天),8%的人报告每天使用。平均而言,学生每天消耗略高于0.25(SD=0.25)克,40%的人报告每天超过1克。大麻使用的平均年龄为16.8岁(SD=1.8)。使用大麻的主要原因是:放松或缓解紧张情绪(75.8%),感觉良好或变高(62.6%),与朋友相处愉快(60.6%)。学生认为平均有47%的同龄人参与了过去一个月的大麻使用,并且只有轻微的风险与经常使用有关。学生们认为他们的亲人大多会赞成减少大麻的使用。回归结果表明,过去一个月的大麻频率(p=0.002)和种族/族裔少数族裔血统(p=0.05)与每天的大麻数量呈正相关,而正常使用大麻的感知风险(β=-0.21)呈负相关。
    对违反大学药物使用政策的学生进行基于证据的大麻干预是迫切需要的,旨在减少大麻使用并减轻其相关的负面影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Cannabis use among college students represents a continued public health issue. The objective was to assess risk factors and reasons for cannabis use among students who violated their university\'s drug use policy, and whether risk factors influenced cannabis use quantity.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional survey study included 99 college students enrolled at a large U.S. public university. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and an ordinary least squares regression analysis was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: Students reported using cannabis an average of 7.4 (SD = 10.2) days in the past month, with 8% reporting daily use. On average, students consumed slightly over 0.25 (SD = 0.25) grams per day, with 40% reporting greater than one gram per day. The average age of onset of cannabis use was 16.8 (SD = 1.8) years old. The top reasons for cannabis use were to: relax or relieve tension (75.8%), feel good or get high (62.6%), and have a good time with friends (60.6%). Students perceived an average of 47% of their peers engaged in past-month cannabis use and only slight risk was associated with regular use. Students perceived their loved ones would mostly approve of a reduction in their cannabis use. Regression results indicated past-month cannabis frequency (p = .002) and being of racial/ethnic minority descent (p = .05) were positively associated with quantity of cannabis per day, while perceived risk of regular cannabis use (β = -0.21) was negatively associated.
    UNASSIGNED: Evidence-based cannabis interventions for students who violate their university\'s drug use policies are critically needed that aim to reduce cannabis use and mitigate its associated negative consequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:潜在的不适当的多重用药(PIP)是导致药物不良反应的主要因素之一。医疗费用增加,降低药物依从性,恶化了病人的状况.这项研究旨在确定在意大利环境中实施的现有干预措施,以监测和管理多重药房。方法:根据PRISMA声明指南进行系统的文献综述(PROSPERO:CRD42023457049)。PubMed,Embase,ProQuest,和WebofScience在没有时间限制的情况下被查询,涵盖所有发表的论文,直到2023年10月。纳入标准遵循PICO模型:多重用药患者;监测/管理多重用药方案的干预措施与无/任何干预措施;干预效果和成本变化方面的结果。结果:重复删除后,提取了153份潜在相关出版物。经过摘要和全文筛选,九篇文章符合纳入标准。总的来说,78%(n=7)是观察性研究,11%(n=1)是实验研究,11%(n=1)为两阶段研究。总共44%(n=4)的研究涉及年龄≥65岁的患者。而56%(n=5)是疾病特异性的。监测是最普遍的干预选择(67%;n=6)。结果主要与多重用药水平(29%;n=6)和合并症(29%;n=6)有关,有效率(14%;n=3),和可避免成本(9%;n=2)。结论:这篇综述概述了意大利仍然缺乏监测/管理PIP的干预措施,解决在制定针对患者的策略以减少卫生系统负担方面未满足的需求。
    Background: Potentially inappropriate polypharmacy (PIP) is among the major factors leading to adverse drug reactions, increased healthcare costs, reduced medication adherence, and worsened patient conditions. This study aims to identify existing interventions implemented to monitor and manage polypharmacy in the Italian setting. Methods: A systematic literature review (PROSPERO: CRD42023457049) was carried out according to the PRISMA statement guidelines. PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, and Web of Science were queried without temporal constraints, encompassing all published papers until October 2023. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO model: patients with polypharmacy; interventions to monitor/manage polypharmacy regimen versus no/any intervention; outcomes in terms of intervention effectiveness and cost variation. Results: After duplicate deletion, 153 potentially relevant publications were extracted. Following abstract and full-text screenings, nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 78% (n = 7) were observational studies, 11% (n = 1) were experimental studies, and 11% (n = 1) were two-phase studies. A total of 44% (n = 4) of the studies involved patients aged ≥ 65 years, while 56% (n = 5) were disease-specific. Monitoring was the most prevalent choice of intervention (67%; n = 6). Outcomes were mainly related to levels of polypharmacy (29%; n = 6) and comorbidities (29%; n = 6), effectiveness rates (14%; n = 3), and avoidable costs (9%; n = 2). Conclusions: This review outlines that Italy is still lacking in interventions to monitor/manage PIP, addressing an unmet need in developing patient-tailored strategies for reducing health-system burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号