interventions

干预措施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多中年和老年人(MAOAs)不从事足够的体力活动(PA),尽管它有据可查的健康衰老的好处。现有的巴勒斯坦权力机构干预措施往往无法有效地覆盖或吸引目标人群。本研究调查了MAOAs对招募策略的偏好,以优化PA干预措施的覆盖范围和吸收,从而增强它们对健康老龄化和公共卫生的影响。对39名MAOA参与者进行了定性访谈(69%为女性,平均年龄=69.46,标准差=7.07),以麦奎尔的说服沟通理论为指导。与来源有关的因素,消息内容,通道,分析了招聘策略的接收者特征和目标行为。我们的研究结果表明,人们更喜欢可信的来源(例如,医疗保健专业人员而不是商业实体)和积极的,非年龄信息。MAOA的渠道偏好各不相同,但强调个性化的重要性。尽管存在异质性,MAOA通常认为自己足够活跃,表明需要改进关于什么构成足够的PA的知识,以及轻松注册或尝试干预措施。根据年龄为不同的MAOA细分市场量身定制招聘策略对于有效参与至关重要。未来的研究可以探索定量研究,以了解沟通因素与各种目标人群特征的关系。
    Many middle-aged and older adults (MAOAs) do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA), despite its well-documented benefits for healthy aging. Existing PA interventions often fail to reach or engage the target population effectively. This study investigates MAOAs\' preferences for recruitment strategies to optimize the reach and uptake of PA interventions, thereby enhancing their impact on healthy aging and public health. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 39 MAOA participants (69% female, mean age = 69.46, SD = 7.07), guided by McGuire\'s Theory on Persuasive Communication. Factors related to the source, message content, channel, receiver characteristics and target behavior of recruitment strategies were analyzed. Our findings suggest a preference for trustworthy sources (e.g., healthcare professionals over commercial entities) and positive, non-ageist messaging. MAOAs vary in their channel preferences but emphasize the importance of personalization. Despite heterogeneity, MAOAs commonly perceive themselves as sufficiently active, indicating a need for improved knowledge on what constitutes sufficient PA, as well as easy enrollment or trying out interventions. Tailoring recruitment strategies to diverse MAOA segments based on age seems crucial for effective engagement. Future research could explore quantitative research into how communication factors relate to various target population characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    实施和采用质量改进干预措施已被证明是困难的,即使在所有参与者都认识到干预的相关性和益处的情况下。描述实施新质量改进干预措施的困难的一种方法是探索不同类型的知识边界,更具体地说是句法,语义和语用边界,影响实施过程。因此,这项研究旨在确定和理解养老院和家庭护理服务实施过程的知识界限。
    本研究采用探索性定性方法。经验数据,包括与领导者和发展护士的个人访谈(n=10)和焦点小组访谈(n=10),源于外部驱动的领导干预和需要内部驱动干预的补充示踪剂项目。这两项实施都在挪威的疗养院和家庭护理服务中进行。根据扎根理论对经验数据进行了归纳分析。
    研究结果表明,句法边界包括诸如缺乏会议场所之类的边界,缺乏知识转移和学习的连续性。此外,句法界限主要与整个组织工作人员的传播和培训有关。语义边界由歧义等边界组成,缺乏对实践的感知影响,也缺乏适当的知识。这个边界主要与推动者角色的不确定性有关。务实的边界包括与缺乏所有权有关的边界,阻力,感到不安全,工作量,不同的观点,缺乏支持和关注,反映了实践的变化。
    本研究为遍历不同的知识边界提供了潜在的解决方案,并为理解与实施质量干预措施有关的知识边界提供了框架。
    UNASSIGNED: Implementation and adoption of quality improvement interventions have proved difficult, even in situations where all participants recognise the relevance and benefits of the intervention. One way to describe difficulties in implementing new quality improvement interventions is to explore different types of knowledge boundaries, more specifically the syntactic, semantic and pragmatic boundaries, influencing the implementation process. As such, this study aims to identify and understand knowledge boundaries for implementation processes in nursing homes and homecare services.
    UNASSIGNED: An exploratory qualitative methodology was used for this study. The empirical data, including individual interviews (n = 10) and focus group interviews (n = 10) with leaders and development nurses, stem from an externally driven leadership intervention and a supplementary tracer project entailing an internally driven intervention. Both implementations took place in Norwegian nursing homes and homecare services. The empirical data was inductively analysed in accordance with grounded theory.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings showed that the syntactic boundary included boundaries like the lack of meeting arenas, and lack of knowledge transfer and continuity in learning. Furthermore, the syntactic boundary was mostly related to the dissemination and training of staff across the organisation. The semantic boundary consisted of boundaries such as ambiguity, lack of perceived impact for practice and lack of appropriate knowledge. This boundary mostly related to uncertainty of the facilitator role. The pragmatic boundary included boundaries related to a lack of ownership, resistance, feeling unsecure, workload, different perspectives and a lack of support and focus, reflecting a change of practices.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides potential solutions for traversing different knowledge boundaries and a framework for understanding knowledge boundaries related to the implementation of quality interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:烟草大麻的共同使用很普遍,并且变得越来越普遍。经常和大量使用大麻的人可能很难戒烟。Quitlines在美国提供免费的戒烟治疗,并且25%的quitline呼叫者也可能是大麻使用者。本文介绍了针对大麻和香烟共同使用者的量身定制干预措施的随机试点研究。该干预措施将戒烟治疗与基于动机增强疗法的大麻干预相结合。方法:随机试点研究是在四个国家资助的戒烟线内进行的,戒烟线教练作为干预人员。102名大麻和香烟共同使用者的戒烟者被随机分配接受常规治疗(TAU)或新的Quitline检查(QLCU)干预。随机分组后90天收集结果。主要结果包括在戒烟线设置中提供QLCU的可行性和可接受性。次要结果包括7天点患病率戒烟,过去30天使用大麻,和大麻使用障碍识别测试分数。结果:研究参与者是大量大麻使用者,过去30年平均使用25天;近70%的使用水平被认为是危险的。保真度评分表明教练成功实施了干预措施。两组的治疗参与度都很高(TAUm=3.4呼叫;QLCUm=3.6呼叫),治疗满意度也很高。TAU对照组的意向治疗戒烟率(无反应者分类为吸烟者)为28.6%,QLCU组为24.5%(P=.45)。讨论:在该烟草大麻共同使用者呼吁戒烟的样本中,危险大麻的使用率很高。对共同用户的干预是可以接受的,也是可行的。没有观察到戒烟结果的改善。在现实世界的临床环境中进行务实的干预开发可以简化干预开发过程。需要对烟草大麻共同使用者以及谁可以从量身定制的干预措施中受益进行更多研究。注册:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04737772,2021年2月4日。
    Background: Tobacco cannabis co-use is common and becoming more prevalent. Frequent and heavy users of cannabis may struggle to quit smoking. Quitlines offer free cessation treatment in the United States and 25% of quitline callers may also be cannabis users. The present paper describes a randomized pilot study of a tailored intervention for cannabis and cigarette co-users. The intervention combines the quitline smoking cessation treatment with a motivational enhancement therapy-based cannabis intervention. Methods: The randomized pilot study was conducted within four state-funded quitlines with quitline coaches as interventionists. 102 quitline callers who were cannabis and cigarette co-users were randomized to receive treatment as usual (TAU) or the new Quitline Check-Up (QLCU) intervention. Outcomes were collected 90 days post-randomization. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability of delivering the QLCU in the quitline setting. Secondary outcomes included 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence, past 30-day cannabis use, and Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test scores. Results: Study participants were heavy cannabis users, averaging 25 days of use in the past 30; nearly 70% used at a level considered hazardous. Fidelity ratings indicated coaches were successful at delivering the intervention. Treatment engagement was high for both groups (TAU m = 3.4 calls; QLCU m = 3.6 calls) as was treatment satisfaction. Intent-to-treat quit rates (with survey non-responders classified as smokers) were 28.6% for the TAU control group and 24.5% for the QLCU group (P = .45). Discussion: Hazardous cannabis use rates were high in this sample of tobacco cannabis co-users calling quitlines to quit smoking. The intervention for co-users was acceptable and feasible to deliver. No improvements in tobacco cessation outcomes were observed. Pragmatic intervention development within a real-world clinical setting can streamline the intervention development process. More research is needed on tobacco cannabis co-users and who can benefit from a tailored intervention. Registered: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04737772, February 4, 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:童年,青春期,和年轻的成年(CAYA)癌症幸存者,有后期影响的风险,包括癌症相关的疲劳,心血管问题,和心理社会挑战,可能会受益于刺激行为调整的干预措施。三个护士主导的电子健康干预措施(REVIVER)通过视频通话和阐述以人为本的护理,开发了认知行为疗法和/或动机性访谈。这些干预措施的目标是:1)疲劳管理,2)更健康的生活方式行为,3)自我效能感和自我管理。本研究旨在评估REVIVER干预对CAYA癌症幸存者和医疗保健专业人员的可行性和潜在有效性。
    方法:在单组混合方法设计中,16-54岁的CAYA癌症幸存者,治疗后五年以上,已注册。可行性,通过鲍恩的可行性研究结果进行评估,包括可接受性,实用性,整合和实施,需求和坚持。来自半结构化访谈的定性数据以及对幸存者和医疗保健专业人员的焦点小组访谈补充了评估。配对样本t检验评估自我报告生活质量的变化,疲劳,生活方式,自我管理,和基线自我效能感(T0),干预后(T1),6个月随访(T2)。
    结果:干预措施和视频咨询通常是可以接受的,实用,并成功整合和实施。成功因素包括护士顾问(即,通信,方法,和态度)和个性化方法。障碍包括可持续性问题,技术问题,干预持续时间短。关于需求,71.4%,65.4%,和100%的合格CAYA癌症幸存者从事疲劳(N=15),生活方式(N=17)和赋权(N=3)干预,分别,采访了5、5和2名参与者,相应地。注意到对赋权干预的兴趣(需求)低(N=3),疲劳和赋权干预的辍学率为三分之一(依从性)。生活质量的提高,疲劳(疲劳干预),生活方式(生活方式干预),自我效能感,在完成疲劳和生活方式干预的幸存者中,自我管理是显而易见的,在干预后立即和干预后六个月观察到中等和较大的效应大小。
    结论:我们的研究证明了护士主导的视频指导(REVIVER干预)的可行性,尽管对授权干预的需求较低,对疲劳和授权干预的依从性较低。对于完成干预措施的人发现的中高效应大小对于研究REVIVER干预措施的有效性的未来研究具有潜在的临床意义。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) cancer survivors, at risk for late effects, including cancer-related fatigue, cardiovascular issues, and psychosocial challenges, may benefit from interventions stimulating behaviour adjustments. Three nurse-led eHealth interventions (REVIVER) delivered via video calls and elaborating on person-centred care, cognitive behaviour therapy and/or motivational interviewing were developed. These interventions target: 1) fatigue management, 2) healthier lifestyle behaviours, and 3) self-efficacy and self-management. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and potential effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions for CAYA cancer survivors and healthcare professionals.
    METHODS: In a single-group mixed methods design, CAYA cancer survivors aged 16-54, more than five years post-treatment, were enrolled. Feasibility, assessed via Bowen\'s outcomes for feasibility studies, included acceptability, practicality, integration and implementation, demand and adherence. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews and a focus group interview with survivors and healthcare professionals supplemented the evaluation. Paired sample t-tests assessed changes in self-reported quality of life, fatigue, lifestyle, self-management, and self-efficacy at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2).
    RESULTS: The interventions and video consults were generally acceptable, practical, and successfully integrated and implemented. Success factors included the nurse consultant (i.e., communication, approach, and attitude) and the personalised approach. Barriers included sustainability concerns, technical issues, and short intervention duration. Regarding demand, 71.4%, 65.4%, and 100% of eligible CAYA cancer survivors engaged in the fatigue (N = 15), lifestyle (N = 17) and empowerment (N = 3) intervention, respectively, with 5, 5 and 2 participants interviewed, correspondingly. Low interest (demand) in the empowerment intervention (N = 3) and dropout rates of one-third for both fatigue and empowerment interventions were noted (adherence). Improvements in quality of life, fatigue (fatigue intervention), lifestyle (lifestyle intervention), self-efficacy, and self-management were evident among survivors who completed the fatigue and lifestyle interventions, with medium and large effect sizes observed immediately after the intervention and six months post-intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of nurse-led video coaching (REVIVER interventions) despite lower demand for the empowerment intervention and lower adherence to the fatigue and empowerment interventions. The medium and high effect sizes found for those who completed the interventions hold potential clinical significance for future studies investigating the effectiveness of the REVIVER interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界各地的医疗保健组织在留住医疗保健员工方面面临挑战,个人和组织因素影响他们的离职意向。这项研究进行了八个在线共同创造研讨会和四个Delphi会议,以获得对工作保留干预措施的定性和深入见解,涉及医护人员,医院经理,和政策制定者。进行了专题分析,导致多种干预措施集中在四个预定义的主题:专业和个人支持,教育,财政激励,和监管措施。专业和个人支持干预措施包括定期的跨专业团队会议,领导力培训计划,自我安排和休假,支持行政和非临床工作,并提供心理咨询。教育干预措施包括促进发展机会,定期评估,入职,导师计划,和同行支持团体。财政激励措施包括提供有竞争力的工资,充足的基础设施,额外的好处,运输可能性,和永久雇佣合同。监管措施解决了各级补充立法的必要性,固定的医护人员与患者的比例,和仪器来监控工作量。要优化保留策略,医疗保健组织应调整这些干预措施,以解决影响其员工离职意愿的独特因素。该研究的结论是,结合个人和专业支持,教育机会,财政激励,和监管措施是必要的,因为没有一个放之四海而皆准的解决方案。
    Healthcare organizations worldwide face challenges in retaining their healthcare workforce, with individual and organizational factors influencing their intentions to leave. This study conducted eight online co-creation workshops and four Delphi sessions to gain qualitative and in-depth insights into job retention interventions, involving healthcare workers, hospital managers, and policymakers. A thematic analysis was conducted, resulting in multiple interventions that were clustered in four pre-defined themes: professional and personal support, education, financial incentives, and regulatory measures. Professional and personal support interventions included regular interprofessional team meetings, leadership training programs, self-scheduling and sabbaticals, support for administrative and non-clinical work, and the provision of psychological counselling. Educational interventions encompassed facilitating development opportunities, periodic evaluations, onboarding, mentorship programs, and peer support groups. Financial incentives included the provision of competitive salaries, adequate infrastructure, extra benefits, transport possibilities, and permanent employment contracts. Regulatory measures addressed the need for complementary legislation across various levels, fixed healthcare worker-to-patient ratio, and instruments to monitor workload. To optimize retention strategies, healthcare organizations should tailor these interventions to address the unique factors influencing their workforce\'s intentions to leave within their specific context. The study concludes that combining personal and professional support, educational opportunities, financial incentives, and regulatory measures is necessary because there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏体力活动与亚裔美国人的不良健康结果有关,与其他种族和族裔群体相比,他们对体育活动指南的坚持程度最低。基于移动应用程序的干预措施是促进健康行为的一种有前途的方法。然而,在主要语言不是英语的亚裔美国人中,缺乏基于应用程序的干预措施来改善体育锻炼。
    目的:这项试点研究旨在评估5周干预的可行性和可接受性,基于证据的手机应用程序与加速度计程序,为了促进中国人的体育锻炼,Tagalog-,或者说越南语的美国人.
    方法:参与者是通过与社区组织合作招募的。该干预措施是根据一项为期12个月的体育锻炼随机对照试验进行的,该试验涉及针对英语成年人的应用程序和加速度计。社会人口统计学特征,生活方式因素,在基线访视时收集物理测量值.进行了7天的磨合期,以筛选可以佩戴FitbitOne(FitbitLLC)加速度计并完成应用程序的每日步骤日记的参与者。在为期4周的干预期间,参与者佩戴加速度计,并在app中报告他们每天的步数.参与者还收到每日信息,以加强面对面教育期间教授的关键内容,提醒他们输入步骤,并提供量身定制的反馈。可行性衡量指标是完成磨合期的合格参与者的百分比,以及在干预期内7天中至少5天使用应用程序日记的参与者的百分比。我们进行了研究后参与者访谈,以探讨整体干预的可接受性。
    结果:在研究开始时,共有19名参与者入组,平均年龄为47岁(SD13.3;范围29-70岁),其中58%(n=11)是女性。在参与者中,26%(n=5)是中国人,32%(n=6)是越南人,42%(n=8)是菲律宾人。所有参与者都符合磨合标准,可以继续进行干预。对应用程序日记的依从性从第2周的74%(n=14)到第4周的95%(n=18)。加速度计每周的每日平均步数从磨合期的8451(SD3378)步数增加到第4周的10,930(SD4213)步。参与者报告了积极的经历,包括增加了行走的动力和能够监测他们的身体活动的乐趣。
    结论:这是第一个针对多组分干预和循证手机应用程序的试点研究,旨在促进使用传统中文应用程序的亚裔美国人的体育锻炼,他加禄语,或者越南人,具有很高的可行性和可接受性。未来的工作重点是多语言移动应用程序,以解决亚裔美国人之间缺乏身体活动的差异。
    BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is associated with adverse health outcomes among Asian Americans, who exhibit the least adherence to physical activity guidelines compared with other racial and ethnic groups. Mobile app-based interventions are a promising approach to promote healthy behaviors. However, there is a lack of app-based interventions focused on improving physical activity among Asian Americans whose primary language is not English.
    OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 5-week intervention using a culturally and linguistically adapted, evidence-based mobile phone app with an accelerometer program, to promote physical activity among Chinese-, Tagalog-, or Vietnamese-speaking Americans.
    METHODS: Participants were recruited through collaborations with community-based organizations. The intervention was adapted from a 12-month physical activity randomized controlled trial involving the app and accelerometer for English-speaking adults. Sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, and physical measurements were collected at the baseline visit. A 7-day run-in period was conducted to screen for the participants who could wear a Fitbit One (Fitbit LLC) accelerometer and complete the app\'s daily step diary. During the 4-week intervention period, participants wore the accelerometer and reported their daily steps in the app. Participants also received daily messages to reinforce key contents taught during an in-person educational session, remind them to input steps, and provide tailored feedback. Feasibility measures were the percentage of eligible participants completing the run-in period and the percentage of participants who used the app diary for at least 5 out of 7 days during the intervention period. We conducted poststudy participant interviews to explore overall intervention acceptability.
    RESULTS: A total of 19 participants were enrolled at the beginning of the study with a mean age of 47 (SD 13.3; range 29-70) years, and 58% (n=11) of them were female. Of the participants, 26% (n=5) were Chinese, 32% (n=6) were Vietnamese, and 42% (n=8) were Filipino. All participants met the run-in criteria to proceed with the intervention. Adherence to the app diary ranged from 74% (n=14) in week 2 to 95% (n=18) in week 4. The daily average steps per week from accelerometers increased each week from 8451 (SD 3378) steps during the run-in period to 10,930 (SD 4213) steps in week 4. Participants reported positive experiences including an increased motivation to walk and the enjoyment of being able to monitor their physical activity.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pilot study of a multicomponent intervention and evidence-based mobile phone app to promote physical activity among Asian Americans who use apps in traditional Chinese, Tagalog, or Vietnamese, which demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability. Future work focused on multilingual mobile apps to address disparities in physical inactivity among Asian Americans should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小儿创伤患者占瑞典紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗的创伤人群的很大一部分,创伤仍然是瑞典儿童死亡的主要原因。先前的研究已经确定了儿科患者院前评估和干预措施的潜在挑战。在瑞典,关于EMS中儿童创伤患者的信息有限.这项研究的目的是调查瑞典EMS中小儿创伤患者的患病率,并描述院前评估,干预措施,和临床结果。
    方法:这项回顾性观察研究在瑞典西南部地区进行。从2019年的救护车和医院记录中随机抽取样本。纳入标准是0-16岁的儿童,他们涉及创伤并由EMS临床医生评估。
    结果:共440名儿童被纳入研究,占整体创伤病例的8.4%。中位年龄为9岁(IQR3-12),60.5%为男性。受伤的主要原因是低(34.8%)和高能量跌倒(21%),其次是交通事故。在4.5%的病例中,儿童被评估为严重受伤。评估后,四分之一的儿童仍留在现场。29.3%的儿童评估了完整的生命体征,81.8%的儿童根据ABCDE结构进行评估。院前专业人员最常见的干预措施是药物管理。死亡率为0.2%。
    结论:小儿创伤病例占总创伤人群的8.4%,在损伤机制和类型上存在差异。相当比例的儿童的生命体征评估不完整。对ABCDE结构的坚持,然而,更高。评估后,儿童仍留在现场,需要进一步调查患者安全。
    BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma patients constitute a significant portion of the trauma population treated by Swedish Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and trauma remains a notable cause of death among Swedish children. Previous research has identified potential challenges in prehospital assessments and interventions for pediatric patients. In Sweden, there is limited information available regarding pediatric trauma patients in the EMS. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pediatric trauma patients within the Swedish EMS and describe the prehospital assessments, interventions, and clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted in a region of Southwestern Sweden. A random sample from ambulance and hospital records from the year 2019 was selected. Inclusion criteria were children aged 0-16 years who were involved in trauma and assessed by EMS clinicians.
    RESULTS: A total of 440 children were included in the study, representing 8.4% of the overall trauma cases. The median age was 9 years (IQR 3-12), and 60.5% were male. The leading causes of injury were low (34.8%) and high energy falls (21%), followed by traffic accidents. The children were assessed as severely injured in 4.5% of cases. A quarter of the children remained at the scene after assessment. Complete vital signs were assessed in 29.3% of children, and 81.8% of children were assessed according to the ABCDE structure. The most common intervention performed by prehospital professionals was the administration of medication. The mortality rate was 0.2%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric trauma cases accounted for 8.4% of the overall trauma population with a variations in injury mechanisms and types. Vital sign assessments were incomplete for a significant proportion of children. The adherence to the ABCDE structure, however, was higher. The children remained at the scene after assessment requires further investigation for patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    母乳对早产儿的益处有据可查。复杂的医疗条件会限制极早产儿直接母乳喂养和接受母乳的能力,然而,这些脆弱的婴儿可能从接受它中受益最大。
    极早产儿有感染的风险,消化挑战,和慢性肺病,偶尔需要气管造口术,以方便机械通气的断奶。当口服给儿童气管造口术时,存在误吸的风险。这个案例研究描述了一个三级新生儿团队,支持一个家庭的直接母乳喂养目标,在一个极度早产的婴儿中,诊断为支气管肺发育不良,需要气管造口术。
    最初,婴儿参与者(出生在妊娠24周和3天,出生体重为540克)的人乳管饲喂。跨学科团队与家庭合作指导婴儿的喂养目标,提供积极的口腔刺激,口服免疫治疗,和频繁的皮肤与皮肤接触,为将来的口服喂养做准备。气管切开术后一个月内,开始口服喂养,在50周龄和1日龄时,将气管造口管作为主要营养来源,实现了直接母乳喂养。
    家庭和医疗团队之间的公开对话是试验对患有气管造口术的极早产儿进行直接母乳喂养的基础。虽然在文献中已经描述了对足月儿进行气管切开术的直接母乳喂养,这是首例极早产儿气管造口术过渡到直接母乳喂养的病例研究.
    UNASSIGNED: The benefits of human milk for preterm infants are well documented. Complex medical conditions can limit the extremely premature infant\'s ability to breastfeed and to receive human milk directly, yet these vulnerable infants may benefit most from receiving it.
    UNASSIGNED: Extremely preterm infants are at risk for infections, digestive challenges, and chronic lung disease, and occasionally require a tracheostomy to facilitate weaning from mechanical ventilation. There is a risk of aspiration when orally feeding a child with a tracheostomy. This case study describes a tertiary neonatal team supporting a family\'s direct breastfeeding goal in an extremely premature infant with a diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia requiring a tracheostomy.
    UNASSIGNED: Initially, the infant participant (born at 24 weeks and 3 days of gestation, with a birthweight of 540 g) was gavage fed with human milk. The interdisciplinary team collaborated with the family to guide the infant\'s feeding goals, providing positive oral stimulation with soothers, oral immune therapy, and frequent skin-to-skin contact to prepare for future oral feeding. Within a month of the tracheotomy procedure, oral feeding was initiated, and direct breastfeeding with the tracheostomy tubing in place was achieved at 50 weeks and 1 day of age as a primary source of nutrition.
    UNASSIGNED: The open dialogue between the family and healthcare team was the foundation for trialing direct breastfeeding for an extremely premature infant with a tracheostomy. While direct breastfeeding of full-term infants with tracheostomies has been previously described in the literature, this is the first case study of an extremely premature infant with a tracheostomy transitioning to direct breastfeeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者(及其亲戚/朋友)的侵略和暴力行为被广泛认为是一种严重的职业危害,医生特别容易在医院内目睹和经历此类事件。研究表明,这种侵略和暴力的负面后果不仅在个人层面上感受到,而且在团队和组织层面。了解如何预防和管理这种行为的医生在医院是紧迫的,没有充分的研究。虽然有许多潜在的有效干预措施,目前尚不清楚哪些对中国医院是有价值和可行的。因为患者的侵略和暴力在中国医院可能比其他国家更频繁地发生,这表明文化差异起到了一定作用,可能需要有针对性的干预措施.
    方法:我们进行了一项德尔菲研究,以就医院干预措施的重要性和可行性达成共识,以预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)对中国医院医生的侵略和暴力行为。中国的17位专家应邀完成了三轮在线问卷调查。
    结果:经过三轮,就44项干预措施达成共识,其他五项干预措施被拒绝,在另外两个问题上没有达成共识。这些干预措施分为八类:环境设计,入口和入口,人员配备和工作实践,领导力与文化,培训和教育,支持,在事件操作期间/之后,医院政策。每个类别都被认为在预防和管理患者(及其亲戚/朋友)对中国医院医生的侵略和暴力方面很重要。这项研究还调查了建议干预措施的可行性,发现44项干预措施中有36项被认为不仅相关,而且在中国医院实施也是可行的。
    结论:本研究概述了可以在中国医院实施的干预措施,以预防和管理患者(及其亲属/朋友)的侵略和暴力行为。during,在暴力事件发生后。
    BACKGROUND: Aggression and violence by patient (and their relatives/friends) is widely acknowledged as a serious occupational hazard, with physicians being particularly susceptible to witnessing and experiencing such incidents within hospitals. Research has shown that the negative consequences of such aggression and violence are not only felt at the individual level, but also at the team and organizational levels. Understanding how to prevent and manage this behavior towards physicians in hospitals is urgent and not fully researched. While there are many potentially effective interventions, it is unclear which ones would be valuable and feasible for Chinese hospitals. Because patient aggression and violence may occur more frequently in Chinese hospitals than in other countries, this suggests that cultural differences play a role and that tailored interventions may be needed.
    METHODS: We conducted a Delphi study to reach a consensus on the importance and feasibility of hospital interventions to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence against physicians in Chinese hospitals. Seventeen experts in China were invited to complete online questionnaires over three rounds.
    RESULTS: After three rounds, consensus was achieved concerning 44 interventions, five other interventions were rejected, and no consensus was reached on another two. These interventions were clustered into eight categories: environment design, access and entrance, staffing and working practices, leadership and culture, training and education, support, during/after-the-event actions, and hospital policy. Each category is considered important in preventing and managing patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence towards physicians in Chinese hospitals. This study also investigated the feasibility of the suggested interventions and found that 36 of the 44 interventions were considered not only relevant, but also feasible for implementation in Chinese hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an overview of interventions that can be implemented in Chinese hospitals to prevent and manage patient (and their relatives/friends) aggression and violence before, during, and after a violent incident occurs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    重症监护药剂师具有独特的资格,可以在重症监护多学科团队中管理治疗方面发挥关键作用,鉴于他们对改善患者预后的贡献,用药安全,并降低了药物的成本。因此,这项研究的目的是评估频率,type,以及重症监护病房临床药师干预及其医师接受度的影响。
    这是一个横截面,前瞻性研究。数据收集时间超过六个月(2023年6月15日至2023年12月15日),最小样本量为384项干预措施。所有入住WadMedani教学医院ICU的患者,GeziraState,包括研究期间的苏丹。
    一般来说,在整个6个月的研究过程中,共对123例患者进行了510项干预.其中,493例(96.7%)临床药师干预得到医师同意。在各类干预措施中,大多数建议关注安全性34.11%(174/510),其中因持续时间长而停药的药物最高为48.27%(48/174),其次是肾剂量调整30.46%(53/174).另一项涉及适应症的临床干预占第二位的23.33%(119/510)。关于节省成本的干预措施,研究表明,在干预措施总数中,124有一个与成本相关的组件,占干预总人数的24.31%。在所有干预措施中,添加药物,频率为103(20.2%)是最反复出现的干预措施,其次是100次给药(19.6%),肾脏剂量调整为53(10.4%)。
    这项研究证明了临床药师如何提高重症监护患者的质量管理,同时降低与药物和护理相关的成本。此外,它为临床药师在ICU环境中的整合提供了有价值的见解,特别是在资源有限的环境中。
    UNASSIGNED: Critical care pharmacists are uniquely qualified to provide a key role within the critical care multi-disciplinary team in managing the aspect of therapy, given their contributions to improved patient outcomes, medication safety, and reduced cost of the drug. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the frequency, type, and impact of clinical pharmacist interventions in the Intensive Care Unit and their physicians\' acceptance.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a cross-sectional, prospective study. Data were gathered over six months (15th June 2023 to 15th December 2023) on a daily basis, with a minimum sample size of 384 interventions. All patients admitted to the ICU at Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Gezira State, Sudan during the study period were included.
    UNASSIGNED: In general, a total of 510 interventions were made for 123 patients throughout the six months course of study. Among them, 493 (96.7%) clinical pharmacist interventions were agreed by physicians. Among categories of interventions, most of the recommendations were concerned about safety 34.11% (174/510), in which drug discontinuation due to long duration was the highest one 48.27% (48/174) followed by the renal dose adjustment 30.46% (53/174). Another clinical intervention involving indication accounted for 23.33% (119/510) in second place. Regarding the cost-saving interventions the study showed that, of the total number of interventions, 124 had a costrelated component, accounting for (24.31%) of the total interventions. Among all the interventions, the addition of drug, with a frequency of 103 (20.2%) was the most recurring intervention, followed by dosing at 100 (19.6%), and renal dose adjustment at 53 (10.4%).
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated how clinical pharmacists might enhance critical care patients\' quality management while reducing the costs associated with medication and care. In addition, it contributes valuable insights into the integration of clinical pharmacists in ICU settings, especially in resource-limited environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号