BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder. Recent studies indicate that GERD may exert systemic effects, potentially elevating the risk of severe infections, including sepsis. Nevertheless, the causal relationship between GERD and sepsis, as well as sepsis-related 28-day mortality, remains uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate the causal relationship between GERD and the risk of sepsis, including 28-day mortality of sepsis.
METHODS: This study utilized a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to analyze data from publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) databases ( https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/ ). The analysis comprised 129,080 cases and 473,524 controls for GERD; 11,643 patients and 474,841 controls for sepsis; and 1,896 patients and 484,588 controls for 28-day mortality from sepsis. The objective was to evaluate the causal impact of GERD on the risk of sepsis and 28-day sepsis mortality. Genetic variation data pertinent to GERD were obtained from the most recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The primary analysis employed the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method. Sensitivity and pleiotropy analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the findings.
RESULTS: MR analysis revealed a notable link between genetically predicted GERD and increased sepsis risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.52; p = 2.79 × 10-9). Moreover, GERD correlated with elevated 28-day mortality of sepsis (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.11-1.85; p = 5.34 × 10-3). These results remained consistent throughout various sensitivity analyses, indicating their resilience against potential pleiotropy and other biases.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that genetic predisposition to GERD may be linked to an elevated risk of sepsis and its associated 28-day mortality. However, the study does not establish a direct causal relationship for GERD itself, nor does it assess the impact of GERD treatment. Further research is needed to explore the underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions involved.

Third space endoscopy (TSE) encompasses a breadth of procedures for the treatment of a variety of GI disorders. The widespread use of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and its diversification to include extended indications and at locations other than the oesophagus has provided an insight into the potential complications encountered. The most common adverse events associated with POEM, the epitome of TSE procedures, include insufflation related injuries, bleeding, failure of mucosal barrier, infections, pain, blown out myotomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease. The purpose of this review is to highlight the pitfalls and to identify the risk factors that may lead to adverse events, and to recommend appropriate salvage interventions in the scope of the current evidence.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic condition affecting the well-being of both adults and children in general medical practice. Research on the effects of fermented soybean (SB) supplementation in managing GERD is relatively new, with limited studies available. The existing research often lacks sufficient dosing regimens and study durations to differentiate between transient placebo effects and sustained benefits. In this study, the beneficial effects of FSB supplementation were investigated in 110 voluntary participants (NCT06524271). The participants were required to take 1 g of FSB supplement once daily for 12 weeks. GERD symptoms were evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ), while inflammatory markers, including interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8), were measured to assess inflammation. The Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire was used to evaluate participants\' quality of life. The results indicated that FSB supplementation significantly (p < 0.05) alleviated heartburn and regurgitation symptoms and reduced levels of IL-4, IL-6, and IL-8, indicating a notable anti-inflammatory effect. Additionally, significant (p < 0.05) improvements were observed in QOLRAD scores, particularly in vitality, emotional distress, and physical/social functioning. Collectively, our findings support the use of FSB as an adjuvant approach in managing GERD, with notable improvements in patients\' quality of life.

Gastric acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, present significant clinical challenges due to their prevalence and potential for severe complications. Effective management of these conditions is essential for symptom relief, mucosal healing, and prevention of complications. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), in the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases and to compare it with traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). A comprehensive analysis of clinical trials and studies was conducted to assess the effectiveness of vonoprazan in managing GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection. The safety profile of vonoprazan was also reviewed, and comparisons were made to PPIs and other gastric acid suppressants. Vonoprazan demonstrates superior and more consistent acid suppression than PPIs, resulting in rapid and sustained symptom relief and mucosal healing. Clinical trials have shown its efficacy in treating GERD, PUD, and H. pylori infection, with higher eradication rates for H. pylori when used in combination therapies. The safety profile of vonoprazan is favorable, with fewer adverse effects and drug interactions compared to PPIs. Vonoprazan offers a promising alternative to traditional PPIs for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. Its unique mechanism of action and superior efficacy make it a valuable option for patients requiring effective and reliable acid suppression. Further research is warranted to explore its potential in broader clinical applications and to establish long-term safety data.

We present a female in her sixties with a recurrent paraesophageal hernia status post open Nissen fundoplication and multiple esophageal dilations who underwent a robotic paraesophageal hernia repair, with extensive lysis of adhesions. The stomach and esophagus were dissected off the crura and the previous wrap was undone. Once the entirety of the stomach and esophagus were freed from their surrounding structures, the hernia sac was able to be excised. The crural defect was closed and gastropexy was performed. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged home. This case is presented to provide evidence that robotic repair presents a viable option in the reoperation of patients following an open Nissen fundoplication as well as provide an overview of the types of hiatal hernias and the indications and options for surgical intervention.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that higher surgeon experience leads to better patient outcomes. In this study, we look at surgeon experience and its association with postoperative outcomes and variation among the practice of surgeons performing paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEH).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1155 patients who underwent PEH repair at a single institution (2010-2023). Surgeon experience was defined as the number of surgeries performed per surgeon and was split using the median surgeries (n = 100), with surgeons performing at or above the median categorized as high-experience and below the median as low-experience surgeons. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to test correlation between surgeon experience and variables, including demographics and intra- and post-operative outcomes.
RESULTS: High-experience surgeons performed more elective cases (93.4% vs 85.5%), but low-experience surgeons operated more on emergent (2.7% vs 0.9%), semi-elective (2.3% vs 1.4%), and urgent cases (9.5% vs 4.3%). Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients who were older (67.5 vs 63.2 years, p < 0.001) and had an increased risk of CVD (72.9% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001). Intraoperative OR time was considerably less for high-experience surgeons (115.8 vs 172.9 min, p < 0.001). Low-experience surgeons had increased risk of intra-operative complications (4.5% vs 1.8%, p = 0.021) and post-op pneumonia within 30 days (1.8% vs 0.3%). However, long-term outcomes such as hernia recurrence (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.78-1.54) and redo-operations for hiatal hernia (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.65-1.75) were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: High-experience surgeons perform more complex revisional surgeries in less time with fewer complications. Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients with higher comorbidities but had significantly higher OR times. Long-term results of recurrence and redo-operations were comparable. These variations suggest that high-experience surgeons are more efficient while operating on more complex cases. These findings have pivotal implications to facilitate mentorship and education among less-experienced surgeons.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disorder that usually presents with heartburn. GERD is diagnosed clinically, but most patients are misdiagnosed due to atypical presentations. The increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has provided multiple ways of diagnosing and treating patients accurately. In this review, multiple studies in which AI models were used to diagnose GERD are discussed. According to the studies, using AI models helped to diagnose GERD in patients accurately. AI, although considered one of the most potent emerging aspects of medicine with its accuracy in patient diagnosis, presents limitations of its own, which explains why healthcare providers may hesitate to use AI in patient care. The challenges and limitations should be addressed before AI is fully incorporated into the healthcare system.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition that affects a significant portion of the Western population. Despite its benign pathophysiology, it has the potential to cause serious complications over time, ranging from conditions that are benign, premalignant, and/or malignant. Traditional treatment options include lifestyle measures, anti-secretory medications (e.g., proton pump inhibitor (PPI)), and surgical options (e.g., Nissen and Toupet fundoplication). However, recent studies have revealed long-term side effects of anti-secretory medications. Moreover, surgical options, though effective, are considered invasive and associated with potential complications. In the current age of ongoing research in minimally invasive options, endoscopic treatment of GERD has become popular. As a result, procedures such as radiofrequency treatment and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) have gained FDA approval and are currently being covered by most insurance. In this review article, we will discuss pre-procedural workup, appropriate patient selection, advantages, disadvantages, procedure techniques, and follow-up of patients who undergo various endoscopic treatments for GERD. In addition, we will review the short and long-term success of these techniques in improving quality of life, use of PPI, and improvement in symptoms considering published data in high-quality peer-reviewed journals.

Background Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common infectious causes of healthcare-associated diarrhea and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is notable for its high prevalence, variety of clinical presentations, and underrecognized morbidity. It is widely treated with acid suppression, both with over-the-counter and prescription medications. There are no studies evaluating the impact of GERD on CDI hospitalization. In this study, we aimed to analyze the influence of concomitant GERD on patients hospitalized for CDI enterocolitis. Methodology This was a retrospective, observational study where we extracted data from 2016 to 2020 from the National Inpatient Sample database. We included all patients hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of CDI with or without a secondary diagnosis of GERD. We compared the demographics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes between these two groups. Results This study identified 239,603 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of CDI. Of these, 67,000 (28%) had a concurrent diagnosis of GERD. Patients with GERD had a higher prevalence of hypertension (41% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.01), hyperlipidemia (50% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.01), obesity (13.7% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (24.4% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.01), and chronic kidney disease (20.7% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.01). Notably, inpatient mortality was lower in CDI hospitalizations with GERD (0.66% vs. 1.46%, p < 0.01). The total hospital charge was reduced in the CDI with GERD group in comparison to the CDI without GERD group (39,599 vs. 43,589, p < 0.01). The length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups (5.3 vs. 5.4 days, p = 0.07). Regarding complications, CDI hospitalizations with GERD demonstrated lower rates of hypovolemic shock (0.5% vs. 0.73%, p = 0.06), septic shock (0.6% vs. 1.05%, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (1.48% vs. 2.04%, p < 0.01), intestinal perforation (0.008% vs. 0.16%, p = 0.03), and lactic acidosis (0.008% vs. 0.16%, p = 0.03). Conversely, CDI patients with GERD had a higher rate of ileus (2.66% vs. 2.16%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Patients with CDI and concurrent GERD exhibited favorable in-hospital outcomes in terms of complication rates, mortality, and total hospital charges. Further research is required to comprehensively explore and validate these findings.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of acupuncture on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on the \"heart-stomach connection\" theory, and to explore its possible mechanisms.
METHODS: Seventy patients with GERD were randomly divided into an acupuncture group (35 cases, 2 cases dropped out) and a medication group (35 cases, 1 case dropped out). The patients in the acupuncture group received acupuncture at bilateral Shenmen (HT 7), Neiguan (PC 6), Burong (ST 19), Tianshu (ST 25), Zusanli (ST 36), Gongsun (SP 4), and Zhongwan (CV 12), with needles retained for 30 min, every other day, three times a week. The patients in the medication group were treated with oral omeprazole capsules, once daily, 20 mg each time. Both groups were treated for 8 weeks. Before and after treatment, the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ), GERD-quality of life scale (GERD-QOL), Hamilton depression scale-24 (HAMD-24), Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS), and Zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were observed. Serum levels of gastrointestinal hormones (gastrin [GAS], motilin [MTL], and vasoactive intestinal peptide [VIP]) were measured, and the clinical efficacy of both groups was evaluated. Correlation between pre-treatment GERDQ score and GERD-QOL score, HAMD-24 score, SDS score, and SAS score was analyzed.
RESULTS: After treatment, the scores of GERDQ, HAMD-24, SDS, and SAS were decreased (P<0.001) and the scores of GERD-QOL were increased (P<0.001), serum levels of GAS and MTL were increased (P<0.001) in both groups, while the serum level of VIP in the acupuncture group was decreased (P<0.001) compared with those before treatment. The acupuncture group had higher GERD-QOL score and lower SAS score than the medication group (P<0.05), with lower serum VIP level (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 75.8% (25/33) in the acupuncture group, and 76.5% (26/34) in the medication group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). GERDQ score was negatively correlated with GERD-QOL scores (r =-0.762, P<0.01) and positively correlated with HAMD-24 score, SDS score, and SAS score (r =0.709, 0.649, 0.689, P<0.01) before treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the \"heart-stomach connection\" theory, acupuncture could effectively improve clinical symptoms, quality of life, and negative emotions in patients with GERD. Its mechanism may be related to the regulation of gastrointestinal hormone levels, thereby promoting the contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter.
目的：观察基于“心胃相关”理论针刺对胃食管反流病的影响，探讨其可能作用机制。方法：将70例胃食管反流病患者随机分为针刺组（35例，脱落2例）和西药组（35例，脱落1例）。针刺组予针刺治疗，穴取双侧神门、内关、不容、天枢、足三里、公孙及中脘，留针30 min，隔日1次，每周3次；西药组予口服奥美拉唑胶囊，每日1次，每次20 mg。两组均治疗8周。观察两组患者治疗前后胃食管反流病问卷（GERDQ）、胃食管反流病生存质量量表（GERD-QOL）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD-24）、Zung抑郁自评量表（SDS）、Zung焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分，检测治疗前后血清胃肠激素[胃泌素（GAS）、胃动素（MTL）、血管活性肠肽（VIP）]含量，并评定两组临床疗效。对治疗前GERDQ评分与GERD-QOL、HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分进行相关性分析。结果：治疗后，两组GERDQ、HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分均较治疗前降低（P<0.001），GERD-QOL评分均较治疗前升高（P<0.001），血清GAS、MTL含量均较治疗前升高（P<0.001），针刺组血清VIP含量较治疗前降低（P<0.001）；针刺组GERD-QOL评分高于西药组（P<0.05），SAS评分低于西药组（P<0.05），血清VIP含量低于西药组（P<0.05）。针刺组总有效率为75.8%（25/33），西药组总有效率为76.5%（26/34），组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。治疗前，GERDQ评分与GERD-QOL评分存在负相关关系（r =-0.762，P<0.01），与HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分存在正相关关系（r =0.709、0.649、0.689，P<0.01）。结论：基于“心胃相关”理论针刺能有效改善胃食管反流病患者的临床症状、生活质量、不良情绪，其机制可能与调节胃肠激素水平，进而促进食管下括约肌收缩有关。.