Validity

有效性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估婴儿可用发育评估的心理测量特性,年龄0-24个月。
    使用PRISMA扩展范围审查作为指南进行了范围审查。以下四个数据库:Medline,CINAHL,Embase,和WebofScience被用来检索文章。对评估的信度和效度进行了心理测量特性分析。结果:根据20篇文章的心理测量特性,确定并评估了15项发展评估。
    三项评估,包括Bayley婴儿和幼儿发展量表第三版(BSID-III),看护者报告的早期开发工具(CREDI),年龄和阶段问卷第三版(ASQ-3),被认定拥有最有力的证据.
    本研究为临床医生提供了全面的婴儿发育评估的最新列表。某些评估需要有关其心理测量特性的其他证据来证实其临床实用性。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the psychometric properties of available developmental assessments for infants, aged 0-24 months.
    UNASSIGNED: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews as a guideline. The following four databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were used to retrieve articles. Assessments were analyzed for psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Results: Fifteen developmental assessments were identified and evaluated based on their psychometric properties from 20 number of articles.
    UNASSIGNED: Three assessments including Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (BSID-III), Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI), and Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition (ASQ-3), were identified to have the most supporting evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provided clinicians with an updated list of all-encompassing infant developmental assessments. Certain assessments require additional evidence regarding their psychometric properties to substantiate their clinical utility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球化世界的贫困趋势对妇女产生了重大影响。不像男人,女性每个月都有强制性开支。特别是贫困妇女在月经期难以获得所需的卫生产品。这就是为什么,这项研究的目的是开发一种测量工具,可以有效和广泛地评估女性的月经贫困。本研究是一项方法学研究,旨在评估量表的心理测量学特性。该研究包括4月至7月居住在蒂尔基耶北部中等收入省的420名妇女,2023年。数据是使用月经贫困量表收集的,量表上的项目是根据现有文献和专家意见(CVI=0.85-0.95)制定的。将样品分成两部分。进行了探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。在进行研究之前,获得了伦理委员会的决定和女性的知情同意.使用SPSS23和AMOS23程序分析收集的数据。全民教育揭示了一个由13个项目和4个因素组成的结构。考虑的四个因素如下;获得卫生产品,生活质量,尴尬,接收信息,关于月经的教育。项目因子载荷从0.46变化到0.91。Cronbach的α系数被确定为0.69。量表项目的校正项目总相关性范围为0.62至0.84。根据验证性因素分析,月经贫困量表的结构方程模型结果被认为是有意义的(p=.000;RMSEA0.64;CMIN/Df1.70)。建议将量表应用于不同文化背景的女性,在不同文化中进行效度和信度研究。
    The tendency toward poverty in the globalizing world significantly affects women. Unlike men, women have mandatory expenses every month. Especially poor women have difficulty in accessing to the hygienic products they need during the menstrual period. That is why, this study aims to develop a measurement tool that can effectively and widely assess women\'s menstrual poverty. This study is a methodological study that evaluates the psychometric properties of the scale. The study included 420 women living in a middle-income province in the north of Türkiye between April - July, 2023. The data were collected using the Menstrual Poverty Scale, and the items on the scale were developed based on a review of existing literature and expert opinions (CVI = 0.85-0.95). The sample was divided into two parts. It was made exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Before conducting the study, an ethics committee decision and informed consent of the women were obtained. The collected data were analyzed using the SPSS 23 and AMOS 23 programs. The EFA revealed a structure consisting of 13 items and four factors. The four factors considered were as follows; access to hygiene products, quality of life, embarrassment, and receiving information, and education about menstruation. The item factor loadings varied from 0.46 to 0.91. The Cronbach\'s alpha coefficient was determined to be 0.69. The corrected item-total correlations for the scale items ranged from 0.62 to 0.84. According to the confirmatory factor analysis, the structural equation modeling results of the Menstrual Poverty Scale were found to be meaningful (p = .000; RMSEA 0.64; CMIN/Df 1.70). It is suggested to conduct validity and reliability studies in different cultures by applying the scale to women from different cultural backgrounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生活质量(QoL)是衡量医疗干预成功与否的重要结果。需要有效和可靠的工具来评估QoL。因此,我们进行这项研究是为了适应和验证尼日利亚西北部讲豪萨语的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的QoL指数(QLI)。方法:使用国际药物经济学和结果研究学会的良好实践原则和基于共识的健康测量仪器指南的选择标准,QLI-SCI版本被翻译成豪萨语,并进行了内容有效性测试,内部一致性,以及尼日利亚西北部SCI患者的重测可靠性。结果:豪萨QLI(HQLI)具有良好的内容效度(CVI=92.18%),内部一致性(克朗巴赫的α=0.855),和重测信度(ICC=0.949[95%CI,0.916-0.969])。结论:HQLI可用于评估SCI患者中讲豪萨语的人的QoL,从而促进SCI人群QoL的稳健测量。
    Background: Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome that is used to measure the success of healthcare interventions. Valid and reliable instruments are required to assess QoL. Hence, we conducted this study to adapt and validate the QoL Index (QLI) among Hausa-speaking people with spinal cord injury (SCI) in northwest Nigeria. Method: Using the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcome Research principles of good practice and the consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments guidelines, the QLI-SCI version was translated into Hausa language and tested for content validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability among people with SCI in northwest Nigeria. Result: The Hausa QLI (HQLI) demonstrated good content validity (CVI = 92.18%), internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha = 0.855), and test-retest reliability (ICC =0.949 [95% CI, 0.916-0.969]). Conclusion: The HQLI can be deployed to assess QoL among Hausa-speaking people with SCI, thus promoting robust measurement of QoL in an SCI population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)对第二语言(L2)学习的积极影响是有据可查的。个人对AI的态度会显著影响其采用。尽管如此,没有设计具体的量表来衡量这种态度,特别是在中国的背景下。为了解决这个差距,我们的研究旨在构建AI辅助的中国大学生二语学习态度量表(AL2AS-CCS)并评估其可靠性,有效性,以及与二语熟练程度的关系。我们的研究包括两个阶段,每个都涉及单独的样本。在第一阶段(样品1:n=379),我们进行了探索性因子分析(EFA)以确定AL2AS-CCS的因子结构.由此产生的双因素结构由12项组成,分为认知和行为成分。在第二阶段(样品2:n=429),我们进行了验证性因素分析(CFA)以验证因素结构并评估模型拟合.样品2中的CFA证实了因子结构并证明了良好的模型拟合。此外,AL2AS-CCS表现出较高的标准效度,内部一致性,和跨性别不变性。我们的发现表明,AL2AS-CCS是评估中国大学生对AI辅助L2学习态度的有效测量工具。此外,发现中国大学生对AI辅助的L2学习保持适度的积极态度。此外,这种态度与他们的L2水平之间存在正相关。
    The positive impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on second language (L2) learning is well-documented. An individual\'s attitude toward AI significantly influences its adoption. Despite this, no specific scale has been designed to measure this attitude, particularly in the Chinese context. To address this gap, our study aims to construct the AI-Assisted L2 Learning Attitude Scale for Chinese College Students (AL2AS-CCS) and evaluate its reliability, validity, and relationship with L2 proficiency. Our research comprises two phases, each involving separate samples. In Phase One (Sample 1: n = 379), we conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the factor structure of the AL2AS-CCS. The resulting two-factor structure consists of 12 items, categorized into cognitive and behavioral components. In Phase Two (Sample 2: n = 429), we performed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the factor structure and assess model fit. CFA in Sample 2 confirmed the factor structure and demonstrated a good model fit. Additionally, the AL2AS-CCS exhibited high criterion validity, internal consistency, and cross-gender invariance. Our findings suggest that the AL2AS-CCS is a valid measurement tool for assessing Chinese college students\' attitude toward AI-assisted L2 learning. Moreover, Chinese college students were discovered to maintain a moderately positive attitude toward AI-assisted L2 learning. Additionally, a positive correlation was identified between this attitude and their L2 proficiency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:初步探讨中文版小脑认知情感综合征量表(CCAS量表)在小脑损伤人群中的信度和效度。
    方法:在本研究中,使用中文版CCAS量表A评估了在卒中中心住院的40例小脑损伤患者和39例正常人,MMSE,和PHQ2,并使用内容效度对结果进行分析,结构有效性,内部一致性,评价者间协议,和重测可靠性。
    结果:语义流畅度的相关系数,音素流畅性,类别切换,数字跨度向前,数字跨度向后,立方体,口头回忆,中文版CCAS量表A与总分的相似性和GoNo-Go分分别为0.586-0.831(P≤0.05),但是影响与总分之间没有显着相关性(P=0.110)。中文版CCAS量表A的认知总分与(r=0.807,P≤0.01),中文版CCAS量表A影响总分与PHQ2总分相关(r=0.884,P≤0.01)。使用主成分分析提取这2个因素,累积方差贡献率为59.633%。各相应因子的因子负荷均>0.5,表明CCAS量表中文版结构效度较好A.Cronbachα=0.827表明内部一致性较好,评分者间信度(ICC>0.95)和重测信度(ICC=0.717-0.895)表明,中文版CCAS量表A具有良好的评分者间信度和重测信度。
    结论:中文版CCAS量表A在小脑损伤人群中具有良好的信度和效度,可用于小脑认知情绪综合征的筛查。
    OBJECTIVE: To preliminarily investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS scale) in the cerebellar injury population.
    METHODS: In this study, 40 patients with cerebellar injury and 39 normal individuals hospitalized in a stroke center were assessed using the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A, MMSE, and PHQ2, and the results were analyzed using content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, inter- rater agreement, and test-retest reliability.
    RESULTS: The correlation coefficients of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, category switching, digit span forward, digit span backward, cube, verbal recall, similarities and Go No-Go subscores in the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A were 0.586-0.831 (P ≤ 0.05) with the total score, but there was no significant correlation between the affect and the total score (P = 0.110). The total cognitive score of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A was correlated with the (r = 0.807, P ≤ 0.01), and the total score of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A affect was correlated with the total score of PHQ2 (r = 0.884, P ≤ 0.01). The 2 factors were extracted using principal component analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 59.633%. The factor loadings of each of the corresponding factors were > 0.5, indicating good structural validity of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A. Cronbach α = 0.827 indicated good internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.717-0.895)indicated that the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A had good inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the CCAS scale A has good reliability and validity in the cerebellar injury population and is useful for screening cerebellar cognitive-emotional syndrome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:相当比例的儿童患有身体疾病;这些儿童通常会出现身心合并症。为了评估儿童的心理健康,需要可用于临床和研究环境的简短量表。这项研究评估了父母报告的安大略省儿童健康研究情绪行为量表简版(OCHS-EBS-B)得分的有效性和可靠性。
    方法:数据来自一项从儿科医院门诊招募的2-16岁身体疾病儿童的纵向研究。验证性因子分析和麦克唐纳系数评估了OCHS-EBS-B的因子结构和内部一致性可靠性,分别。点双材料相关性评估了OCHS-EBS-B和迷你国际儿童和青少年神经精神病学访谈(MINI-KID)之间的协议,结构化的诊断性访谈.Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了有与没有身心合并症的儿童之间的OCHS-EBS-B得分(已知组有效性)。
    结果:在该身体疾病儿童样本中复制了OCHS-EBS-B的三因素结构(χ2=196.23(272),p<0.001;CFI=0.98;TLI=0.98;SRMR=0.06;RMSEA[90%CI]=0.034[0.027,0.044])。它具有出色的内部一致性可靠性(ω=0.86-0.92),并且与MINI-KID中度相关(基线:rpb=0.43-0.51;6个月:rpb=0.55-0.65)。与没有身心合并症的儿童相比,OCHS-EBS-B得分明显更高。
    结论:研究结果证实了心理测量证据,即OCHS-EBS-B是慢性躯体疾病儿童心理健康的有效和可靠的衡量标准。它的简洁性和强大的心理测量特性使OCHS-EBS-B成为儿科综合身心健康服务中常规使用的强大候选者。
    BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of children have a physical illness; these children commonly experience physical-mental comorbidity. To assess child mental health, brief scales that can be used in clinical and research settings are needed. This study assessed the validity and reliability of parent-reported Ontario Child Health Study Emotional Behavioural Scale-Brief Version (OCHS-EBS-B) scores.
    METHODS: Data come from a longitudinal study of children aged 2-16 years with a physical illness recruited from outpatient clinics at a pediatric hospital. Confirmatory factor analysis and McDonald\'s coefficient assessed the factor structure and internal consistency reliability of the OCHS-EBS-B, respectively. Point biserial correlations assessed agreement between the OCHS-EBS-B and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID), a structured diagnostic interview. The Wilcoxon rank sum test compared OCHS-EBS-B scores between children with versus without physical-mental comorbidity (known-group validity).
    RESULTS: The three-factor structure of the OCHS-EBS-B was replicated in this sample of children with physical illness (χ2 = 196.23(272), p < 0.001; CFI = 0.98; TLI = 0.98; SRMR = 0.06; RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.034 [0.027, 0.044]). It had excellent internal consistency reliability (ω = 0.86-0.92) and was moderately correlated with the MINI-KID (baseline: rpb = 0.43-0.51; 6 months: rpb = 0.55-0.65). OCHS-EBS-B scores were significantly higher among children with versus without physical-mental comorbidity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings confirm psychometric evidence that the OCHS-EBS-B is a valid and reliable measure of mental health in children with chronic physical illness. Its brevity and robust psychometric properties make the OCHS-EBS-B a strong candidate for routine use in integrated pediatric physical and mental health services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在开发一种工具,用于评估居住在社区中的50岁以上成年人的身体机能。
    根据对各种国家健康调查和队列研究的回顾,建造了一个144个项目的银行来评估身体功能。在50岁或以上的成年人中进行焦点小组访谈,以调查他们对60个选定项目的理解水平,然后对具有全国代表性的样本进行项目预测(n=508)。最终的25项问卷在独立样本(n=259)上进行了基于经典测试和项目响应理论的有效性和可靠性测试。在6个月随访时的预测有效性在单独的样本中进行测试(n=263)。
    新开发的生命功能(LF)量表评估了功能限制的维度,残疾人,和社会活动。该量表满足一维假设,具有良好的项目拟合度,并证明了标准有效性,构造效度,内部一致性高(克朗巴赫的α=0.93),和重测信度(类内相关系数=0.84;95%CI,0.76-0.89)。LF量表包括25个项目,总分从0到100。较高的分数表明较高的功能水平。LF评分与6个月时的身体功能评分显着相关。
    开发LF量表是为了评估中年人或老年人的身体机能。未来的研究应在国家样本上测试该仪器,并评估其在不同人群亚组中的应用。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to develop an instrument for assessing physical functioning among adults aged 50 years or older living in the community.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on a review of various national health surveys and cohort studies, a 144-item bank was constructed for assessing physical functioning. Focus group interviews were conducted among adults aged 50 years or older to investigate their level of understanding of 60 selected items, followed by a pretest of the items on a nationally representative sample (n = 508). The final 25-item questionnaire was tested on an independent sample (n = 259) for validity and reliability based on classical test and item response theories. Predictive validity at the 6-month follow-up was tested in a separate sample (n = 263).
    UNASSIGNED: The newly developed Life Functioning (LF) scale assessed the dimensions of functional limitations, disabilities, and social activities. The scale satisfied a one-dimensionality assumption with good item fit and demonstrated criterion validity, construct validity, high internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha = 0.93), and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.76-0.89). The LF scale comprised 25 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicated higher levels of functioning. The LF score was significantly associated with the physical functioning score at 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: The LF scale was developed to assess the physical functioning of people in their late midlife or older. Future studies should test the instrument on a national sample and evaluate its application in diverse population subgroups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:失眠严重程度指数(ISI)是一种广泛使用的衡量失眠严重程度的指标。各种ISI研究结果表明,不同的因素解决方案和有意义的个体内变化(MWIC)可以检测失眠患者的治疗反应。这项研究检查了ISI因子解决方案和心理测量指数,以在临床试验环境中的稳健患者样本中定义MWIC。
    方法:我们努力通过使用两个大型的验证性因子分析(CFA)模型检查结构成分来改进先前对ISI的验证,lemborexant治疗失眠的安慰剂对照临床试验。使用最佳拟合的双因素解决方案,我们评估了基于锚的,基于分布和接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线的方法来得出MWIC的估计值。
    结果:其他研究中提出的7项量表的模型结构不符合我们两个lemborexant临床试验(N=1956)的观察数据以及基于6项的双因素解决方案。使用基于锚的三角剖分,基于分布的,和ROC方法,我们确定,在我们的患者样本中,使用6个项目的5点降低最代表失眠患者的临床意义改善.
    结论:在该患者样本中,6项双因素量表比7项量表具有更好的心理测量特性。在6项量表上,ISI总分降低5分代表MWIC.提议的MWIC的普适性可能限于具有相似的人口统计学和临床特征的患者群体。
    BACKGROUND: The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a widely used measure of insomnia severity. Various ISI research findings suggest different factor solutions and meaningful within-individual change (MWIC) to detect treatment response in patients with insomnia. This study examined an ISI factor solution and psychometric indices to define MWIC in a robust patient sample from clinical trial settings.
    METHODS: We endeavored to improve upon previous validation of ISI by examining structural components of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models using two large, placebo-controlled clinical trials of lemborexant for insomnia. Using the best-fitting two-factor solution, we evaluated anchor-based, distribution-based and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods to derive an estimate of the MWIC.
    RESULTS: The model structure for the 7-item scale proposed in other research did not fit the observed data from our two lemborexant clinical trials (N = 1956) as well as a two-factor solution based on 6 items did. Using triangulation of anchor-based, distribution-based, and ROC methods, we determined that a 5-point reduction using 6 items best represented a clinically meaningful improvement in individuals with insomnia in our patient sample.
    CONCLUSIONS: A 6-item two-factor scale had better psychometric properties than the 7-item scale in this patient sample. On the 6-item scale, a reduction of 5 points in the ISI total score represented the MWIC. Generalizability of the proposed MWIC may be limited to patient populations with similar demographic and clinical characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开发和评估中文版的视觉功能障碍症状问卷(CSQVD),以量化患有各种眼病的学龄儿童的视觉功能障碍症状,并探讨眼科疾病与视觉功能障碍症状的关系。
    遵循标准比例调整程序,视觉功能障碍症状问卷(SQVD)被翻译成中文(CSQVD)。我们采用随机抽样调查了198名7-18岁的门诊患者,以评估CSQVD的心理测量特性。使用可靠且经过验证的问卷,我们在眼科中心对406例学龄期患者的视觉功能障碍症状的决定因素进行了评估.CSQVD评分与人口统计学和临床变量相关,包括性别,年龄,眼睛位置,屈光力,和最佳矫正视力。单变量分析确定了潜在的风险因素,对P值<0.05的因素进行二元logistic回归和多元线性回归分析。
    CSQVD量表的临界比率(CR)值范围为6.028至10.604。Cronbach的Alpha系数为0.779,Spearman-Brown的半可靠度也为0.779。I-CVI在0.83至1.000之间变化,S-CVI/Ave为0.857,KMO值为0.821。多因素回归分析显示高度近视(OR=5.744,95%CI[1.632,20.218],P​=0.006)和弱视(OR​=9.302,95%CI[1.878,46.058],P​=0.006)是CSQVD症状的显著预测因子。多元线性回归分析显示弱视眼的BCVA(B​=​-5.052,95%CI[-7.779,2.325],P​=​0.000)和SE幂(B​=​-0.234,95%CI[-0.375,0.205],P​=​0.001)显着影响CSQVD量表得分。
    中文版SQVD量表(CSQVD)证明了良好的可行性,歧视性权力,有效性,以及评估中国学龄儿童的可靠性。此外,那些患有严重近视和弱视的人报告了更多的视觉功能障碍症状。
    UNASSIGNED: To develop and evaluate a Chinese version of the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (CSQVD) to quantify visual dysfunction symptoms in school-age children with various eye diseases, and to explore the relationship between ophthalmological disorders and visual dysfunction symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: Following standard scale adaptation procedures, the Symptom Questionnaire for Visual Dysfunctions (SQVD) was translated into Chinese (CSQVD). We employed random sampling to survey 198 outpatients aged 7-18 to assess the psychometric properties of the CSQVD. Using the reliable and validated questionnaire, we evaluated the determinants of visual dysfunction symptoms among 406 school-age patients at an eye center. The CSQVD scores were correlated with demographic and clinical variables, including gender, age, eye position, refractive power, and best-corrected visual acuity. Univariate analysis identified potential risk factors, followed by binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression analysis on factors with a P-value <0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: The CSQVD scale\'s critical ratio (CR) values ranged from 6.028 to 10.604. The Cronbach\'s Alpha coefficient was 0.779, and Spearman-Brown split-half reliability was also 0.779. The I-CVI varied from 0.83 to 1.000, the S-CVI/Ave was 0.857, and the KMO value was 0.821. Multifactorial regression analysis indicated that high myopia (OR ​= ​5.744, 95% CI [1.632, 20.218], P ​= ​0.006) and amblyopia (OR ​= ​9.302, 95% CI [1.878, 46.058], P ​= ​0.006) were significant predictors of CSQVD symptoms. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that BCVA of amblyopic eyes (B ​= ​-5.052, 95% CI [-7.779, 2.325], P ​= ​0.000) and SE power (B ​= ​-0.234, 95% CI [-0.375, 0.205], P ​= ​0.001) significantly affected the CSQVD scale scores.
    UNASSIGNED: The Chinese version of the SQVD scale (CSQVD) demonstrates good feasibility, discriminatory power, validity, and reliability in assessing Chinese school-aged children. Furthermore, those who have severe myopia and amblyopia reported more visual dysfunction symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医学生中的患者护理所有权(PCO)是医学教育领域中不断增长的领域。虽然PCO受到越来越多的关注,在日本本科医学教育的背景下,没有评估PCO的工具。本研究旨在翻译,文化适应,并在日本背景下验证PCO量表-医学生(PCOS-S)。
    方法:我们收集了来自五所不同大学的五年级和六年级医学生的调查数据,这些学生的位置和类型各不相同。结构有效性,收敛有效性,并对内部一致性可靠性进行了检查。
    结果:分析了来自122名受访者的数据。日本PCOS-S的因素分析显示,Cronbach的α值超过令人满意的标准(0.70)的三个因素。观察到日本PCOS-S总分与作为学习环境的临床科室的全球评分之间呈正相关(Pearson相关系数=0.61)。
    结论:我们将PCOS-S翻译成日语,并评估其心理测量特性。日文版具有较好的信度和效度。该仪器在评估医学生PCO的发展方面具有潜在价值。
    BACKGROUND: Patient care ownership (PCO) among medical students is a growing area in the field of medical education. While PCO has received increasing attention, there are no instruments to assess PCO in the context of Japanese undergraduate medical education. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the PCO Scale - Medical students (PCOS-S) in the Japanese context.
    METHODS: We collected survey data from fifth- and sixth-grade medical students from five different universities varying in location and type. Structural validity, convergent validity, and internal consistency reliability were examined.
    RESULTS: Data from 122 respondents were analyzed. Factor analysis of the Japanese PCOS-S revealed three factors with Cronbach\'s alpha values exceeding the satisfactory criterion (0.70). A positive correlation was observed between the total Japanese PCOS-S scores and the global rating scores for the clinical department as a learning environment (Pearson\'s correlation coefficient = 0.61).
    CONCLUSIONS: We conducted the translation of the PCOS-S into Japanese and assessed its psychometric properties. The Japanese version has good reliability and validity. This instrument has potential value in assessing the development of medical students\' PCO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号