Substaging of T1 urothelial cancer is associated with tumor progression and its reporting is recommended by international guidelines. However, it has not been integrated in risk stratification tools and there is no agreement on the best method to use for its reporting. We aimed to investigate the applicability, interobserver variability, and prognostic value of histological landmark based and micrometric (aggregate linear length of invasive carcinoma (ALLICA), microscopic vs. extensive system, Rete Oncologica Lombarda (ROL) system) substaging methods. A total of 79 patients with the primary diagnosis of T1 urothelial cancer treated with conventional transurethral resection and adjuvant BCG therapy between 2000 and 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna were included. The anatomical and metrical substaging systems were evaluated using agreement rate, Cohen\'s kappa, Kendall\'s tau, and Spearman rank correlation. Prognostic value for high-grade recurrence or T2 progression was evaluated in uni- and multivariable analysis. Applicability and reproducibility were good to moderate and varied between substaging methods. Obstacles are mainly due to fragmentation of samples. Anatomical substaging was associated with progression in univariable and multivariable analysis. In our cohort, we could only identify anatomical landmark-based substaging to be prognostic for T2 progression. A major obstacle for proper pathological assessment is fragmentation of samples due to operational procedure. Avoiding such fragmentation might improve reproducibility and significance of pathological T1 substaging of urothelial cancer.

UNASSIGNED: The reliability of interpretation of coronary angiography as a diagnostic tool was investigated. Furthermore, the impact of interobserver variability of coronary lesions on clinical decision-making was assessed. One of our motivations to do this research was the research gaps and our aim to have up-to-date information regarding interobserver variability among different cardiologists.
UNASSIGNED: Our objective was to quantify interobserver variability among cardiologists who have seen angiograms independently. Disagreement among cardiologists in the visual assessment of invasive coronary angiography of coronary artery stenosis is not uncommon in previous studies. Three cardiologists with extensive experience in coronary angiography, including the primary cardiologist of each patient, read the angiograms of 200 patients from Toronto General Hospital independently.
UNASSIGNED: Our research showed the mean agreement among all participating observers was 77.4%; therefore, the interobserver variability of coronary angiography interpretation was 22.6%.
UNASSIGNED: Coronary angiography is still the gold-standard technique for guidance regarding coronary lesions. Sometimes, coronary angiography results in underestimation or overestimation of a lesion\'s functional severity. Interobserver variability should also be considered when interpreting the severity of coronary stenoses via invasive coronary angiography. This research shows that interobserver variability regarding coronary angiograms is still present (22.6%).
Plain language summary: The gold-standard method for diagnosing coronary stenosis, invasive coronary angiography has some challenges too. One of these challenges has been the difference among various cardiologists regarding determination of severity of each coronary stenosis. In this study, we focused on differences in interobserver variability in coronary angiography interpretation. Three cardiologists who were experienced in coronary angiography read each patient’s coronary angiogram separately. Overall, 200 patients with a history of angiography at Toronto General Hospital were selected randomly. The research showed that overall agreement among all participating cardiologists with regard to the reading of coronary angiograms was 77.4%. In other words, interobserver variability of 22.6% was seen among the readers.

BACKGROUND: Approximately, 55% of breast carcinomas are reported to be HER-2 low breast carcinomas. Trastuzumab-Deruxtecan is a new FDA-approved targeted therapy for HER-2 low metastatic breast carcinomas, making it essential that all efforts are made to identify these tumors in specimens submitted for pathologic examination. Cytology specimens are often the first and only modality of this assessment due to the ease of specimen procurement. This study aimed to determine the variability in HER-2 immunostaining interpretation among observers using cytologic specimens from metastatic sites.
METHODS: A pathology database search was made to identify metastatic breast carcinoma reported in cytology specimens. A manual search was then done to identify cases of HER-2 low category, H&E cell block and HER-2 neu immunostain slides were retrieved for a total of 50 cases. Reviewer #1 and #2 independently interpreted HER-2 immunostain of all 50 cases. Only discordant cases were sent for reviewer-3 interpretation. All three were blinded by the metastatic site, and original HER-2 interpretation.
RESULTS: Of 50 cases, 11 cases (22%) were reported as concordant scores between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 but had a discordant original IHC report. Additionally, 4 cases (8%) had discordant reporting of HER2 IHC stain between reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 making a total of 15 cases (30%) with overall discordant results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the interobserver variability of HER-2 immunostain interpretation for HER-2 low category of breast carcinomas. We recommend the need for more robust laboratory techniques including molecular for uniform identification of these unique targetable metastatic breast carcinoma groups.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand reasons for interobserver variability in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) through a survey of pathologists to provide insight for improvements in the reliability and reproducibility of OED diagnoses.
METHODS: The study design included quantitative and qualitative methodology. A pre-validated 31-item questionnaire was distributed to general, head and neck, and oral and maxillofacial histopathology specialists worldwide.
RESULTS: A total of 132 pathologists participated and completed the questionnaire. Over two-thirds used the three-tier grading system for OED, while about a third used both binary and three-tier systems. Regular reporters of OED preferred the three-tier system and grading architectural features. Continuing education significantly aided recognition of architectural and cytological changes. Irregular epithelial stratification and drop-shaped rete ridges had the lowest prognostic value and recognition scores, while loss of epithelial cell cohesion had the highest. Most participants used clinical information and often sought a second opinion when grading OED.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study has found that frequency of OED reporting and attendance of CME/CPD can play an important role in grading OED. Variations in the prognostic value of individual histological features and the use of clinical information may further contribute to interobserver variability.

Grading lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) is controversial and not universally accepted. The histomorphologic feature of tumor budding (TB) is an established independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, and its importance is growing in other solid cancers, making it a candidate for inclusion in tumor grading schemes. We aimed to compare TB between preoperative biopsies and resection specimens in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and assess interobserver variability. A retrospective cohort of 249 consecutive patients primarily resected with LUSC in Bern (2000-2013, n = 136) and Lausanne (2005-2020, n = 113) with available preoperative biopsies was analyzed for TB and additional histomorphologic parameters, such as spread through airspaces and desmoplasia, by 2 expert pathologists (M.M., C.N.). Results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival. In resection specimens, peritumoral budding (PTB) score was low (0-4 buds/0.785 mm2) in 47.6%, intermediate (5-9 buds/0.785 mm2) in 27.4%, and high (≥10 buds/0.785 mm2) in 25% of cases (median bud count, 5; IQR, 0-26). Both the absolute number of buds and TB score were similar when comparing tumor edge and intratumoral zone (P = .192) but significantly different from the score obtained in the biopsy (P < .001). Interobserver variability was moderate, regardless of score location (Cohen kappa, 0.59). The discrepant cases were reassessed, and consensus was reached in all cases with identification of causes of discordance. TB score was significantly associated with stage (P = .002), presence of lymph node (P = .033), and distant metastases (P = .020), without significant correlation with overall survival, tumor size, or pleural invasion. Desmoplasia was significantly associated with higher PTB (P < .001). Spread through airspaces was present in 34% and associated with lower PTB (P < .001). To conclude, despite confirming TB as a reproducible factor in LUSC, we disclose areas of scoring ambiguity. Preoperative biopsy evaluation was insufficient in establishing the final TB score of the resected tumor.

Accurate measurement of testicular volume (TV) in boys is an important tool in clinical practice, e.g., in varicocele treatment. This study aims to assess the degree of intra- and interobserver variability of testicular volume measurements. In a prospective study, boys between 11 and 17 years of age without testicular pathology were enrolled. Testicular ultrasound was performed by three investigators (A: pediatric radiologist; B: pediatric surgery/urology resident; C: pediatric urologist). Intraobserver variability was calculated in investigators B and C and interobserver variability between all three investigators. A total of 30 boys were enrolled. Mean intraobserver variability in both observers was +0.3% with a range of -39.6 to 51.5%. The proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 18.6%. The mean interobserver variability was -1.0% (range: -74.1% to 62.8%). The overall proportion of measurements with a difference >20% was 35%. A lower testicular size of < 4 mL showed a significantly higher rate of >20% difference in both the intraobserver group (31.1% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.035) and the interobserver group (63.2% vs. 26.2%; p = 0.000031). Furthermore, the rate of >20% difference was significantly lower in obese compared to non-obese patients in both the intraobserver (2.8% vs. 22.4%; p = 0.0084) and the interobserver group (24% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.0427). Both intraobserver and interobserver variability in ultrasound-based TV measurements in pubertal boys contain a relevant degree of uncertainty that renders them unsuitable for individualized follow-up care. At the cohort level, however, mean differences in ultrasound-based TV measurements are low enough to make ultrasound comparisons reasonable.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the topic of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) interobserver variability, including a discussion of major sources, mitigation approaches, and future directions.
METHODS: A narrative review of PI-RADS interobserver variability.
RESULTS: PI-RADS was developed in 2012 to set technical standards for prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), reduce interobserver variability at interpretation, and improve diagnostic accuracy in the MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. While PI-RADS has been validated in selected research cohorts with prostate cancer imaging experts, subsequent prospective studies in routine clinical practice demonstrate wide variability in diagnostic performance. Radiologist and biopsy operator experience are the most important contributing drivers of high-quality care among multiple interrelated factors including variability in MRI hardware and technique, image quality, and population and patient-specific factors such as prostate cancer disease prevalence. Iterative improvements in PI-RADS have helped flatten the curve for novice readers and reduce variability. Innovations in image quality reporting, administrative and organisational workflows, and artificial intelligence hold promise in improving variability even further.
CONCLUSIONS: Continued research into PI-RADS is needed to facilitate benchmark creation, reader certification, and independent accreditation, which are systems-level interventions needed to uphold and maintain high-quality prostate MRI across entire populations.

BACKGROUND: Early Barrett cancer can be curatively treated by endoscopic resection. The choice of the resection technique, however-endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or submucosal dissection (ESD)-largely depends on the assumed infiltration depth as judged by the endoscopist. However, the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis of the degree of cancer infiltration is not known.
METHODS: Three to four high-quality images (both in overview and close-up) from 202 of early Barrett esophagus cancer cases (82% men, mean age 66.9 years) were selected from our endoscopy database (73.3% stage T1a and 26.7% in stage T1b). Images were shown to 9 Barrett esophagus experts, with patients\' clinical data (age, sex, Barrett esophagus length) and biopsy results. The experts were asked to predict infiltration depth (T1b vs. T1a), and to suggest the appropriate endoscopic resection technique (EMR or ESD, or surgery). Interobserver variability (kappa values) was also determined for these parameters.
RESULTS: Overall positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) to diagnose T1b versus T1a infiltration were 40.7% (95% CI: 36.7, 44.8) and 79.8% (95% CI: 77.5, 81.9), respectively; kappa value was 0.41. Paris classification (kappa 0.51) and suggested treatment also varied between experts. In a post hoc analysis, only the correlation between lesions classified as invisible or flat according to the Paris classification (IIB; 25% of all cases) and the suggested resection technique was better: In this subgroup, EMR was recommended in >80% of cases, with a high complete (basal R0) resection rate (mean of 88.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Precise endoscopic distinction between mucosal and submucosal involvement of Barrett esophagus cancer by experts as a basis for choosing the resection technique has limited predictive values and high interobserver variability. It seems that mainly invisible/flat lesions may result in good resection outcomes when treated by EMR, but this stratification strategy has to be assessed in further studies.

Objective Evaluating an artificial intelligence (AI) tool (AIATELLA, version 1.0; AIATELLA Oy, Helsinki, Finland) in interpreting cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging to produce measurements of the aortic root and valve by comparison of accuracy and efficiency with that of three National Health Service (NHS) cardiologists. Methods AI-derived aortic root and valve measurements were recorded alongside manual measurements from three experienced NHS consultant cardiologists (CCs) over three separate sites in the northeast part of the United Kingdom. The study utilised a comprehensive dataset of CMR images, with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) being the primary measure of concordance between the AI and the cardiologist assessments. Patient imaging was anonymised and blinded at the point of transfer to a secure data server.  Results The study demonstrates a high level of concordance between AI assessment of the aortic root and valve with NHS cardiologists (ICC of 0.98). Notably, the AI delivered results in 2.6 seconds (+/- 0.532) compared to a mean of 334.5 seconds (+/- 61.9) by the cardiologists, a statistically significant improvement in efficiency without compromising accuracy. Conclusion AI\'s accuracy and speed of analysis suggest that it could be a valuable tool in cardiac diagnostics, addressing the challenges of time-consuming and variable clinician-based assessments. This research reinforces AI\'s role in optimising the patient journey and improving the efficiency of the diagnostic pathway.

暂无摘要。