OBJECTIVE: Timely treatment is one of the most relevant prognostic factors in patients with urgent epileptic seizures. Despite the available evidence, treatment times remain suboptimal. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the impact of the \"seizure code\" in an emergency department, focusing on both treatment times and hospital outcomes of patients with urgent epileptic seizures.
METHODS: An ambispective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department of a public hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Treatment times and hospital outcomes were evaluated both before and after the implementation of the seizure code.
RESULTS: A total of 336 patients were included (94 in the pre-seizure code period and 242 in the post-seizure code period). Both cohorts were comparable in terms of clinical and demographic baseline characteristics. After the implementation of the seizure code, in-hospital treatment times improved among patients with status epilepticus and seizure cluster. For the group of patients with status epilepticus, the time from arrival to the first benzodiazepine decreased from a median of 100.5 min (IQR: 43-152.5) to a median of 20 min (IQR: 10-45) (p = .0063), and the time from arrival to the first non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medication decreased from a median of 155 min (IQR: 49-194) to a median of 39 min (IQR: 25-57) (p = .0071). For the group of patients with seizure cluster, the time from arrival to the first non-benzodiazepine antiseizure medication decreased from a median of 296 min (IQR: 112.5-409) to a median of 72 min (IQR: 46-111) (p < .001). The seizure code significantly decreased the risk of inappropriate benzodiazepine use (p = .0087), in-hospital seizure recurrence (p < .001), in-hospital mortality (p = .0074), and prolonged hospitalizations (more than 48 h) (p = .0475).
CONCLUSIONS: The seizure code shortens the time to treatment, reduces the length of hospital stay, decreases the risk of inappropriate benzodiazepine use, and lowers both the in-hospital seizure recurrence and in-hospital mortality among patients with urgent epileptic seizures.

UNASSIGNED: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality worldwide and an important public health problem. The quality of patient care is negatively impacted when nurses lack adequate knowledge regarding the management of sepsis. On the other hand, little is known regarding Ethiopian nurses\' knowledge of sepsis management.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the level of knowledge and the associated factors towards sepsis management among nurses working in emergency departments in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
UNASSIGNED: From March 18 to April 18, 2022, a health facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A simple sampling technique (lottery method) was used to select the hospitals. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 25. The study employed logistic regression analysis to examine the association between the independent variables and the level of knowledge. Variables were significantly associated with a level of knowledge if they had a p-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 127 participants, more than half (56.7%) had poor knowledge. Nurses\' knowledge of managing sepsis was significantly associated with not having regular training, a low level of education, and working experience of less than five years. The findings of the multivariable regression analysis revealed that the following variables were associated with a nurse\'s knowledge of sepsis management: low level of education (AOR = 3.2 (95% CI, 1.16-8.77), lack of training adjusted odd ratio (AOR = 2.5 (95% CI, 1.07-5.93), and less than five years of work experience (AOR = 3.6 (95% CI, 1. 29-9.830).
UNASSIGNED: The majority of nurses had inadequate knowledge of managing sepsis. On the other hand, the majority of nurses had a favourable attitude toward sepsis management. Lack of prior training, a low level of education, and less than five years of work experience were all significantly associated with nurses\' poor knowledge regarding sepsis management. This study recommends that hospital managers should provide on-the-job and long-term training for nurses working in the emergency department to enhance the level of nurses\' knowledge towards sepsis management at their institutions.

BACKGROUND: There is compelling evidence that AXRs have limited clinical value in the acute setting. Despite this, they are frequently used in many EDs. This quality improvement project (QIP) aimed to reduce unnecessary AXR use in a single-centre ED.
METHODS: All consecutive AXRs conducted on patients aged 16 years and above in a District General Hospital ED in England between 2 August 2021 and 5 June 2022 were included. This period of time was divided into a pre-intervention and intervention period, during which iterative plan-do-study-act cycles were undertaken to implement a wide range of educational and system level interventions.
RESULTS: 501 AXRs were performed during the QIP. The average number of AXRs per fortnight fell from 27.5 during the preintervention period to 17.6 during the intervention period and met criteria for special cause variation. No special cause variation in CT usage was observed, with an average number of 70.7 and 74 CT abdomen-pelvis scans during the preintervention and intervention periods, respectively. 119 (23.8%) AXRs showed acute and clinically significant findings, and of this group 118/119 (99.2%) underwent further imaging. In contrast, 382 (76.2%) AXRs had no acute or clinically significant findings, and of this group 344/382 (90.1%) proceeded to further imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre QIP, coordinated multidisciplinary interventions were effective in reducing unnecessary AXR usage without resulting in excess CTs. The methods and interventions described are easily reproducible at minimal expense and may be of interest to other departments undertaking quality improvement work in this area.

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate two prediction models for pediatric radiographic pneumonia.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the performance of two prediction models (Pneumonia Risk Score [PRS] and CARPE DIEM models) from a prospective convenience sample of children 90 days - 18 years of age from a pediatric emergency department undergoing chest radiography for suspected pneumonia between January 1, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. We evaluated model performance using the original intercepts and coefficients and evaluated for performance changes when performing recalibration and re-estimation procedures.
RESULTS: We included 202 patients (median age 3 years, IQR 1-6 years), of whom radiographic pneumonia was found in 92 (41.0%). The PRS model had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.79), which was higher than the CARPE DIEM (0.59; 95% CI 0.51-0.67) (P<0.01). Using optimal cutpoints, the PRS model showed higher sensitivity (65.2%, 95% CI 54.6-74.9) and specificity (72.7%, 95% CI 63.4-80.8) compared to the CARPE DIEM model (sensitivity 56.5 [95% CI 45.8-66.8]; specificity 60.9 [95% CI 50.2-69.2]). Recalibration and re-estimation of models improved performance, particularly for the CARPE DIEM model, with gains in sensitivity and specificity, and improved calibration.
CONCLUSIONS: The PRS model demonstrated better performance than the CARPE DIEM model in predicting radiographic pneumonia. Among children with a high rate of pneumonia, these models did not reach a level of performance sufficient to be used independently of clinical judgement. These findings highlight the need for further validation and improvement of models to enhance their utility.

BACKGROUND: Cases of newly identified hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increased 3.8-fold between 2010 and 2017 due to increasing injection drug use. Furthermore, multiple HIV outbreaks have been attributed to injection drug use. This retrospective cohort study assessed the prevalence of and testing history for HIV and HCV among opioid overdose patients in the emergency department.
METHODS: Each encounter including an opioid overdose at three emergency departments between January 2021 and May 2022 was reviewed. Emergency department note, most recent primary care note, and laboratory results from January 2000 to May 2022 were reviewed for the history of HIV and HCV testing. Fisher\'s exact test was used to identify associations of HIV and HCV status with age or gender.
RESULTS: There were 134 encounters for 120 patients. A total of 72 were male and 48 were female. A total of 48 had a history of HCV testing. A total of 54 had a history of HIV testing. A total of 20 tested positive for HCV antibodies. One tested positive for HIV. Eight had detectable HCV viral loads, six had undetectable HCV viral loads, and six had no quantitative testing. One had a detectable HIV viral load. A total of 16.7% of both males and females had a history of a positive HCV test. Females were more likely to have ever received an HCV test compared to males (p=0.013, odds ratio (OR)=.68 (confidence interval (CI): 1.293-5.836)). Patients aged 55-64 were more likely to test positive than any other age group (p=0.018, OR=3.889 (CI: 1.391-11.81)), and were the least likely to be untested (p=0.037, OR=0.1905 (CI: 0.03914-0.9334)).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial burden of HCV among opioid overdose patients in central Missouri, United States, emergency departments, particularly among male patients and those aged 55-64. Universal HCV screening for individuals being observed following an overdose could detect many undiagnosed HCV infections.

BACKGROUND: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) and cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) are both characterized by episodic, acute transitions from asymptomatic states to highly symptomatic states of nausea, repetitive vomiting, and often severe abdominal pain. Patients with CVS and CHS face significant challenges to abort or mitigate episodes at home and often require emergency department (ED)-based care.
OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the current treatment approach to abort acute CVS and CHS episodes at home and in ED settings. Multiple pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions have been demonstrated to potentially abort CVS or CHS episodes. Systemic pharmacologic agents often used as abortive therapy include triptans, antiemetics, anxiolytics, NK-1 receptor antagonists, antipsychotics, sedatives in general, and various analgesic / anti-inflammatory medications. Nonsystemic, nonpharmacologic approaches include reducing external stimuli (quiet room, dim lights, etc.), and hot water bathing or the application of topical capsaicin cream. More research is needed to develop evidence-based, individualized abortive treatment plans, as well as to determine whether the abortive treatment for CVS requires a fundamentally different approach than for CHS. When home-based approaches fail, all patients with CVS or CHS should receive nonjudgmental, informed, and compassionate care in the ED to abort their episode. Patients with more severe forms of CVS/CHS who require more frequent ED utilization should develop care plans with their ED to assure predictable and effective treatment.

BACKGROUND: Prompt epinephrine administration is important to improve outcomes in anaphylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess the impact of prehospital epinephrine on clinical outcomes of hospital admission, biphasic reactions, and ED length of stay (LOS) in a cohort of ED anaphylaxis patients including both children and adults.
METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective and retrospective cohort study of anaphylaxis patients from April 2008 to December 2022. Associations between prehospital epinephrine administration with biphasic reactions and ED LOS were assessed with univariable models and the association with ED disposition was assessed with both univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 1107 patient visits were included for analysis. The median patient age was 29 (IQR 14-50), 593 (53.6%) patients were female, 366 (33.1%) were under 18 years of age. Patients in the prehospital epinephrine group were also less likely to experience a biphasic reaction (5.4% vs 9.3%; OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92) and had a decreased ED LOS (median 4.0 hours vs 4.7 hours). There was no difference in hospital admission between patients with and without prehospital epinephrine in both the univariable (19.5% vs 15.7%; OR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.94-1.79) and multivariable (aOR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.71-1.64) models.
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital epinephrine administration reduced the odds of a biphasic reaction and decreased ED LOS but did not reduce hospitalization in this cohort of ED anaphylaxis patients. Our findings suggest that timely administration of prehospital epinephrine is associated with improved patient outcomes.

We aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain severity and agreement between the visual analog scale (VAS) and the verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) in people with sickle cell disease experiencing an acute vaso-occlusive episode in the emergency department (ED). In the COMPARE-VOE trial (NCT03933397), participants were administered the VAS (0-100), NRS (0-100), and descriptor scale (a lot better, a little better, same, a little worse, much worse) every 30 minutes while in the ED. We analyzed data from 100 participants (mean age 30.2 years; 61% female). We calculated the mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between current and preceding scores when the participant reported a little worse or a little better pain for each scale (255 VAS and 150 NRS observations) to assess the MCID for the VAS & NRS. Pearson correlation and the Bland Altmann method were used to assess the agreement among 411 paired VAS & NRS observations. Our results indicated that the MCID for the VAS was 8.77 mm (95% CI: 7.43 mm, 10.83 mm) and the NRS was 8.29 (95% CI: 6.47, 11.60). The VAS & NRS scales had a correlation of 0.88 (p < 0.001). The Bland Altmann indicated a mean difference of -4.6 ±1.96 and the 95% limits of agreement ranged from 20 to -29. Despite high correlation, there was considerable variability of agreement between the VAS and NRS scales, indicating that these scales are not interchangeable to assess pain during a vaso-occlusive event. PERSPECTIVE: The average MCID in pain severity for individuals with sickle cell disease experiencing a VOE using the VAS (8.77 mm) is lower than previously reported, and the MCID for NRS was (8.29). We assessed the agreement between the VAS and NRS and determined that the scales cannot be used interchangeably to measure SCD pain intensity.

OBJECTIVE: Ondansetron, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, is commonly used in emergency departments to treat nausea and vomiting. In 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning that this medicine may cause QT prolongation, potentially leading to deadly arrhythmias. The objective of this study was to characterize the QT interval prolongation associated with ondansetron use in the Emergency Department.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of adult patients who presented to the emergency department during a one-year period and were treated with intravenous ondansetron. We investigated the QT prolongation associated with dosages. ECGs were obtained before the medication and 5, 15, and 30 minutes after IV drug administration. Every QT measurement was recorded and compared to the zero point. The severity of drug-induced QT prolongation was determined according to the recommendations of the International Conference on Compliance (ICH). QTc prolongation was categorized as \'negligible\' (<5 ms), \'significant\' (>20 ms), \'potential concern\' (>30 ms), or \'definitely worrying\' (>60 ms).
RESULTS: Of the 435 patients enrolled in the study, 60% (261 patients) were female and the mean age was 39 (±18). The QT prolongation peaked at the fifth minute and remained consistent at the fifteenth and thirty-first minutes. The maximum prolongation of the mean QT duration occured at the fifth minute (7.9 ± 18.1 ms). No patient revealed any problems with cardiac conduction. The prolonged QT interval was not related to the dose of ondansetron, but QT measurements were higher in the 30th minute in patients treated with 8 mg of ondansetron. The effect of ondansetron administration on QT prolongation was found to be above the \'negligible\' but below the \'significant\' value, according to the ICH recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, QT prolongation due to ondansetron administration was below the \'important\' value according to the recommendations of the ICH. No cases of cardiac arrhythmia were reported in any of the partients. Thus, routine ECG monitoring in patients given ondansetron due to the risk of QTc prolongation does not seem cost-effective when evaluated together with additional factors such as its negative impact on emergency patient flow, waste of personnel and time, and increase in healthcare costs. In the absence of a known risk of cardiac arrhythmia, IV administration of 4 mg and 8 mg of ondansetron doses no risk of QT prolongation in the emergency population.

BACKGROUND: The development of emergency department (ED) triage systems remains challenging in accurately differentiating patients with acute abdominal pain (AAP) who are critical and urgent for surgery due to subjectivity and limitations. We use machine learning models to predict emergency surgical abdominal pain patients in triage, and then compare their performance with conventional Logistic regression models.
METHODS: Using 38 214 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between March 1, 2014, and March 1, 2022, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥18 years). We utilized routinely available triage data in electronic medical records as predictors, including structured data (eg, triage vital signs, gender, and age) and unstructured data (chief complaints and physical examinations in free-text format). The primary outcome measure was whether emergency surgery was performed. The dataset was randomly sampled, with 80% assigned to the training set and 20% to the test set. We developed 5 machine learning models: Light Gradient Boosting Machine (Light GBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Random Forest (RF). Logistic regression (LR) served as the reference model. Model performance was calculated for each model, including the area under the receiver-work characteristic curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curve), as well as the confusion matrix.
RESULTS: Of all the 38 214 acute abdominal pain patients, 4208 underwent emergency abdominal surgery while 34 006 received non-surgical treatment. In the surgery outcome prediction, all 4 machine learning models outperformed the reference model (eg, AUC, 0.899 [95%CI 0.891-0.903] in the Light GBM vs. 0.885 [95%CI 0.876-0.891] in the reference model), Similarly, most machine learning models exhibited significant improvements in net reclassification compared to the reference model (eg, NRIs of 0.0812[95%CI, 0.055-0.1105] in the XGBoost), with the exception of the RF model. Decision curve analysis shows that across the entire range of thresholds, the net benefits of the XGBoost and the Light GBM models were higher than the reference model. In particular, the Light GBM model performed well in predicting the need for emergency abdominal surgery with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models have demonstrated superior performance in predicting emergency abdominal pain surgery compared to traditional models. Modern machine learning improves clinical triage decisions and ensures that critically needy patients receive priority for emergency resources and timely, effective treatment.