UNASSIGNED: Sepsis is a major cause of mortality worldwide and an important public health problem. The quality of patient care is negatively impacted when nurses lack adequate knowledge regarding the management of sepsis. On the other hand, little is known regarding Ethiopian nurses\' knowledge of sepsis management.
UNASSIGNED: To assess the level of knowledge and the associated factors towards sepsis management among nurses working in emergency departments in public hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
UNASSIGNED: From March 18 to April 18, 2022, a health facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A simple sampling technique (lottery method) was used to select the hospitals. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 25. The study employed logistic regression analysis to examine the association between the independent variables and the level of knowledge. Variables were significantly associated with a level of knowledge if they had a p-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 127 participants, more than half (56.7%) had poor knowledge. Nurses\' knowledge of managing sepsis was significantly associated with not having regular training, a low level of education, and working experience of less than five years. The findings of the multivariable regression analysis revealed that the following variables were associated with a nurse\'s knowledge of sepsis management: low level of education (AOR = 3.2 (95% CI, 1.16-8.77), lack of training adjusted odd ratio (AOR = 2.5 (95% CI, 1.07-5.93), and less than five years of work experience (AOR = 3.6 (95% CI, 1. 29-9.830).
UNASSIGNED: The majority of nurses had inadequate knowledge of managing sepsis. On the other hand, the majority of nurses had a favourable attitude toward sepsis management. Lack of prior training, a low level of education, and less than five years of work experience were all significantly associated with nurses\' poor knowledge regarding sepsis management. This study recommends that hospital managers should provide on-the-job and long-term training for nurses working in the emergency department to enhance the level of nurses\' knowledge towards sepsis management at their institutions.

BACKGROUND: Cases of newly identified hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increased 3.8-fold between 2010 and 2017 due to increasing injection drug use. Furthermore, multiple HIV outbreaks have been attributed to injection drug use. This retrospective cohort study assessed the prevalence of and testing history for HIV and HCV among opioid overdose patients in the emergency department.
METHODS: Each encounter including an opioid overdose at three emergency departments between January 2021 and May 2022 was reviewed. Emergency department note, most recent primary care note, and laboratory results from January 2000 to May 2022 were reviewed for the history of HIV and HCV testing. Fisher\'s exact test was used to identify associations of HIV and HCV status with age or gender.
RESULTS: There were 134 encounters for 120 patients. A total of 72 were male and 48 were female. A total of 48 had a history of HCV testing. A total of 54 had a history of HIV testing. A total of 20 tested positive for HCV antibodies. One tested positive for HIV. Eight had detectable HCV viral loads, six had undetectable HCV viral loads, and six had no quantitative testing. One had a detectable HIV viral load. A total of 16.7% of both males and females had a history of a positive HCV test. Females were more likely to have ever received an HCV test compared to males (p=0.013, odds ratio (OR)=.68 (confidence interval (CI): 1.293-5.836)). Patients aged 55-64 were more likely to test positive than any other age group (p=0.018, OR=3.889 (CI: 1.391-11.81)), and were the least likely to be untested (p=0.037, OR=0.1905 (CI: 0.03914-0.9334)).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial burden of HCV among opioid overdose patients in central Missouri, United States, emergency departments, particularly among male patients and those aged 55-64. Universal HCV screening for individuals being observed following an overdose could detect many undiagnosed HCV infections.

BACKGROUND:  Reducing the frequency of emergency department (ED) patient visits for treatment, particularly in urgent instances, is a global healthcare objective. Additionally, a more extended stay in the ED can harm a patient\'s prognosis during later hospitalization. This study aims to investigate the factors affecting the length of stay in the ED in a teaching hospital.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review study was done between January 1, 2021, and February 31, 2021, involving 122 adult patients who had delayed ED visits to King Khalid Hospital in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Data on the patient\'s characteristics, visit time, and the causes for the delay based on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) were gathered and analyzed. Factors associated with more than six hours of delay were investigated in a univariate analysis.
RESULTS: The mean age was 52.3 ±13.5 years, and 42 (34.4%) were more than 65 years of age. More than half of the study population were female (n=66; 54.1%). Most delays occurred among CTAS 4 and 5 cases (47.5%), and 22 (18.0%) occurred during holidays. The mean delay time was 6.1 ±1.8 hours. The leading delay causes were multiple consultations with further investigations (37.7%) and conflict between the teams (36.1%). In univariate analysis, ED visiting at holiday time (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.04-0.40, p <0.001) and CTAS 4 and 5 (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 0.95-5.30, p = 0.003) significantly had more delay. Factors associated with delay in univariate analysis were multiple consultations with further investigations (OR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.32-6.26, p = 0.013), various assessments in different ED areas with a late arrival of the specialist (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20-0.91, p = 0.042), and conflict between the teams (OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.17-5.54, p = 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, multiple assessments in different ED areas and conflict between the teams were the main factors that caused delays in ED. Implementing a timeframe monitoring system for consultations while emphasizing accelerated decision-making and disposition for patients and understanding teamwork collaboration may reduce patients\' length of stay in the ED. Implementing these strategies and evaluating their impact on the length of stay in the ED requires further investigation.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a major patient safety concern and has a negative impact on healthcare systems and healthcare providers. We hypothesized that it would be feasible to control crowding by employing a multifaceted approach consisting of systematically fast-tracking patients who are mostly not in need of a hospital stay as assessed by an initial nurse and treated by decision competent physicians.
METHODS: Data from 120,901 patients registered in a secondary care ED from the 4tth quarter of 2021 to the 1st quarter of 2024 was drawn from the electronic health record\'s data warehouse using the SAP Web Intelligence tool and processed in the Python programming language. Crowding was compared before and after ED transformation from a uniform department into a high flow (α) and a low flow (β) section with patient placement in gurneys/chairs or beds, respectively. Patients putatively not in need of hospitalization were identified by nurse, placed in in the α setting and assessed and treated by decision competent physicians. Incidence of crowding, number of patients admitted per day and readmittances within 72 h following ED admission before and after changes were determined. Values are number of patients, mean ± SEM and mean differences with 95% CIs. Statistical significance was ascertained using Student\'s two tailed t-test for unpaired values.
RESULTS: Before and after ED changes crowding of 130% amounted to 123.8 h and 19.3 h in the latter. This is a difference of -104.6 ± 23.9 h with a 95% CI of -159.9 to -49.3, Δ% -84 (p = 0.002). There was the same amount of patients / day amounting to 135.8 and 133.5 patients / day Δ% = -1.7 patients 95% CI -6.3 to 1.6 (p = 0.21). There was no change in readmittances within 72 h before and after changes amounting to 9.0% versus 9.5%, Δ% = 0.5, 95%, CI -0.007 to 1.0 (p > 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS: It appears feasible to abate crowding with unchanged patient admission and without an increase in readmittances by fast-track assessment and treatment of patients who are not in need of hospitalization.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this single-institution retrospective study of patients treated with radiotherapy for brain metastases (BM) was to evaluate the timing of the palliative care (PC) decision, the use of health care services, i.e., emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations, and the implementation of radiotherapy at the end of life (EOL).
UNASSIGNED: Data on all cancer patients with BM treated in Finland at the Vaasa Central Hospital Radiotherapy Department between March 2011 and November 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The follow-up period lasted until November 2021. Altogether, 91 patients (54 men, mean age 67 years [range 23-91 years]) were analyzed. Data on timing of PC decision, visits to the PC outpatient unit, and ED and hospitalization periods were collected retrospectively from patients\' records.
UNASSIGNED: The median overall survival from diagnosis of BM was 3.7 months (range 1-62 months) and, after radiotherapy, 2 months (0-61 months). Thirty-two percent of the patients received radiotherapy in the last month of life. During the last 30 days of life, 44 patients (48%) visited the ED and 38 (42%) were hospitalized. Patients with an early PC decision (>30 days before death) had fewer hospitalizations (22% vs. 53%; p = 0.005) and died less often during the hospitalization period (9% vs. 27%; p = 0.047) at EOL. No significant difference was found in ED visits (41% vs. 53%; p = 0.28).
UNASSIGNED: For a large proportion of patients with BM, the prognosis is very poor. It is important to identify these patients and abstain from radiotherapy at EOL to reducing inappropriate health care utilization.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation that may have poor outcomes but often does not require hospital admission. There is little evidence to guide dispositional decisions.
UNASSIGNED: The authors sought to create a risk score for predicting short-term serious outcomes (SSO) in patients with AHF.
UNASSIGNED: We pooled data from 3 prospective cohorts: 2 published studies and 1 new cohort. The 3 cohorts prospectively enrolled patients who required treatment for AHF at 10 tertiary care hospital EDs. The primary outcome was SSO, defined as death <30 days, intubation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), myocardial infarction, or relapse to ED <14 days. The logistic regression model evaluated 13 predictors, used an AIC-based step-down procedure, and bootstrapped internal validation.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 2,246 patients in the 3 cohorts (N = 559; 1,100; 587), the mean age was 77.4 years, 54.5% were male, 3.1% received intravenous nitroglycerin, 5.2% received ED NIV, and 48.6% were admitted to the hospital. There were 281 (12.5%) SSOs including 70 deaths (3.1%) with many in discharged patients. The final HEARTRISK6 Scale included 6 variables: valvular heart disease, tachycardia, need for NIV, creatinine, troponin, and failed reassessment (walk test). Choosing HEARTRISK6 total-point admission thresholds of ≥1 or ≥2 would yield, respectively, sensitivities of 88.3% (95% CI: 83.9%-91.8%) and 71.5% (95% CI: 65.9%-76.7%) and specificities of 24.7% (95% CI: 22.8%-26.7%) and 50.1% (95% CI: 47.9%-52.4%) for SSO.
UNASSIGNED: Using 3 large prospectively collected datasets, we created a concise and sensitive risk scale for patients with AHF in the ED. Implementation of the HEARTRISK6 scale could lead to safer and more efficient disposition decisions.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are too often hospitalized from the emergency department (ED) without needing hospital care. Knowledge about rates and causes of these preventable emergency admissions (PEAs) is limited. This study aimed to assess the proportion of PEAs, the level of agreement on perceived preventability between physicians and patients, and to explore their underlying causes as perceived by patients, their relatives, and the admitting physician.
METHODS: A multi-center multi-method study at the ED of one academic and two regional hospitals in the Netherlands was performed. All patients aged > 70 years and hospitalized from the ED were consecutively sampled during a six-week period. Quantitative data regarding patient and clinical characteristics and perceived preventability of the admission were prospectively collected from the electronical medical record and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Agreement on preventability between patient, caregivers and physicians was assessed by using the Cohen\'s kappa. Underlying causes of a PEA were subsequently collected by semi-structured interviews with patients and caregivers. Physician\'s perceived causes of a PEA were collected by telephone interviews and by open-ended questions sent by email. Thematic content analysis was used to analyze the interview transcripts and email narratives.
RESULTS: Out of 773 admissions, 56 (7.2%) were deemed preventable by patients or their caregivers. Admitting physicians regarded 75 (9.7%) admissions as preventable. The level of agreement between these two groups was low with a Cohen\'s kappa score of 0.10 (p = 0.003). Perceived causes for PEAs related to six themes: (1) insufficient support at home, (2) suboptimal care in the community setting, (3) errors in hospital care, (4) time of presentation to ED and availability of resources, (5) delayed help seeking behavior, and (6) errors made by patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contribute to the existing evidence that a substantial part (almost one out of ten) of the older adults visiting the ED is perceived as unnecessary hospital care by patients, caregivers and health care providers. Findings also provide valuable insight into the causes for PEAs from a patient perspective. Further research is needed to understand why the perspectives of those responsible for hospital admission and those being admitted vary considerably.

(1) Background: Identifying acute aortic syndrome (AAS) and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) in busy emergency departments (EDs) is crucial due to their life-threatening nature, necessitating timely and accurate diagnosis. (2) Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted in the ED of three hospitals. Adult patients visiting the ED between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020 with a chief complaint of chest or back pain were enrolled in the study. The collected chest radiography (CXRs) data were divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) datasets. The training dataset was trained by four different convolutional neural network (CNN) models. (3) Results: A total of 1625 patients were enrolled in this study. The InceptionV3 model achieved the highest F1 score of 0.76. (4) Conclusions: Analysis of CXRs using a CNN-based model provides a novel tool for clinicians to interpret ED patients with chest pain and suspected AAS and TAA. The integration of such imaging tools into ED could be considered in the future to enhance the diagnostic workflow for clinically fatal diseases.

Background: While cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be life-saving for patients in cardiac arrest, it simultaneously puts them at risk for skeletal and soft tissue injuries. The prevalence of cardiovascular and thoracic wall injuries related to CPR varies significantly in the literature, from 21% to more than 78%. After restoration of circulation, ischemia-reperfusion brain injury ensues. Sedation is one of the interventions that can reduce its effects on brain cells. The purpose of this study was to analyse the use of analgesics and sedatives in nontraumatic patients after sudden cardiac arrest in the peri-resuscitation period in the emergency department. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. An analysis was performed on the electronic health records of 131 patients who underwent CPR, with ages ranging from 24 to 96 years. The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Chest wall injuries were assessed based on the results of X-ray imaging (n = 39; 31%) and computed tomography (n = 87; 69%). Of the 126 cases, 17.5% had rib fractures and 6.3% had rib and sternal fractures. Almost 78% of the patients (n = 102) received sedatives and/or analgesics during the peri-resuscitation period. Monotherapy was used in 85 cases. Among these drugs the most frequently mentioned were midazolam (45.2%), fentanyl (26.8%), and propofol (20.8%). Conclusions: As only two-thirds of the patients received sedation and half received analgesics, there is still room for a broader incorporation of analgesia and sedation into peri-resuscitation care protocols.