Cholangiopancreatography

胰胆管造影术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:十二指肠镜定期培养对及时检测污染至关重要,但他们的敏感性仍然未知。这项研究旨在确定十二指肠镜培养物的敏感性,并估计受污染的十二指肠镜使用的患病率。
    方法:我们将2015年3月至2022年6月的十二指肠镜微生物监测数据与使用数据相结合,以评估患者暴露于被肠道或口腔来源的微生物(MGO)污染的十二指肠镜。我们确定了十二指肠镜在一年内重复的物种水平污染,并使用分子分型来确认遗传相关性。单个十二指肠镜的多个十二指肠镜培养物中的遗传相关微生物表明持续污染期,并且将簇定义为不同十二指肠镜之间持续污染的重叠期。如果微生物不能用于分子分析,我们将这一时期标记为未经证实。如果样品在持续污染期间未显示靶微生物,则将其定义为假阴性。我们使用了三种情况来假设污染使用和培养敏感性。
    结果:我们纳入了556个十二指肠镜培养物,其中185个(33.3%)被MGO污染。十二指肠镜的总使用量为5226。我们发现了一个持续的污染期,六个未经证实的时期,和两个集群。根据我们的场景假设,受污染的使用百分比从12.3%到23.7%不等,培养敏感性为82.2%~98.9%。
    结论:十二指肠镜培养物的敏感性有限,导致临床使用的十二指肠镜清除不当,不断增加的疫情风险。应重新评估单一培养物结束十二指肠镜隔离的适用性。
    OBJECTIVE: Periodic duodenoscope cultures are essential to timely detect contamination, but their sensitivity remains unknown. This study aims to determine the sensitivity of duodenoscope cultures and to estimate the prevalence of contaminated duodenoscope use.
    METHODS: We combined duodenoscope microbiological surveillance data from March 2015 to June 2022 with usage data to evaluate patient exposure to duodenoscopes contaminated with microorganisms of gut or oral origin (MGO). We identified duodenoscopes with repeated species-level contamination within a year and used molecular typing to confirm genetic relatedness. Genetically related microorganisms over multiple duodenoscope cultures of a single duodenoscope indicated a period of sustained contamination and a cluster was defined as overlapping periods of sustained contamination between different duodenoscopes. If microorganisms were not available for molecular analysis, we marked the period as unconfirmed. A sample was defined as false-negative if it did not show the target microorganism(s) in a period of sustained contamination. We used three scenarios to hypothesize about contaminated use and culture sensitivity.
    RESULTS: We included 556 duodenoscope cultures with 185 (33.3%) contaminated with MGO. The total usage of duodenoscopes was 5226. We identified one period of sustained contamination, six unconfirmed periods, and two clusters. Depending on our scenario assumptions, the percentage of contaminated use varied from 12.3% to 23.7%, and culture sensitivity ranged from 82.2% to 98.9%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Limited sensitivity of duodenoscope cultures leads to improper clearance of duodenoscopes for clinical use, increasing risks of outbreaks. The applicability of a single culture to end a duodenoscope\'s quarantine should be reevaluated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术是全球范围内常见的手术之一,也是治疗胆结石的金标准。不可吸收的手术夹可能会滑动并迁移,从而导致各种问题。胆总管结石.
    作者报告了一例43岁女性,主诉上腹痛。7年前,她因症状性胆石症接受了胆囊切除术。腹部超声检查显示胆总管扩张,随后进行内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影。取回了带有金属夹的单个黑色石头。
    胆囊切除术后夹子迁移应被视为胆总管结石症的区别之一。腹部超声检查显示胆总管扩张。通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影术进行进一步的治疗。
    目前,作为胆总管结石病的手术夹很少见,但应该被视为腹部疼痛的区别之一。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the common surgeries occurring worldwide and the gold standard for the management of gallstone disease. The non-absorbable surgical clips may slip and can migrate causing a variety of problems as such, choledocholithiasis.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors report a case of 43-year-old female who presented with the complaint epigastric pain. She had undergone cholecystectomy 7 years back for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed a dilated common bile duct following which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was done. A single black-colored stone with the metal clip was retrieved.
    UNASSIGNED: Post-cholecystectomy clip migration should be considered as one of the differentials for choledocholithiasis. Ultrasonography of the abdomen shows the dilated common bile duct. Further management is done by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical clips acting as nidus for choledocholithiasis is rare these days but should be considered as one of the differentials for pain abdomen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:直肠吲哚美辛减少了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后的胰腺炎。然而,对于已经接受预防性胰腺支架置入术的患者,没有足够的证据证明其额外获益.我们的目标是评估吲哚美辛对接受胰腺支架置入术的高危患者的影响。
    方法:对所有接受有挑战性胆管插管的抢救插管技术的患者(选定的高危患者)进行队列研究。根据ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)的预防方法将患者分为两组:一组接受吲哚美辛和胰腺支架置入术的组合,而另一个单独接受胰腺支架置入术。对PEP进行了比较分析,高淀粉酶血症,消化道出血,和ERCP术后胰腺炎患者的术后住院时间。
    结果:在2017年11月至2023年5月期间,共纳入607例天然乳头患者,140分为吲哚美辛加支架组,467分为单独支架组。整个队列的总PEP率为4.4%,两组之间在PEP率方面没有观察到统计学差异(P=0.407),轻度PEP(P=0.340),中度至重度PEP(P=1.000),高淀粉酶血症(P=0.543),消化道出血(P=0.392),术后住院时间(P=0.521)。此外,使用多变量分析的敏感性分析也验证了这些发现。
    结论:吲哚美辛不能降低常规接受预防性胰腺支架置入术的高危患者PEP的发生率或严重程度。因此,似乎没有必要额外直肠给药吲哚美辛以进一步缓解PEP.
    BACKGROUND: Rectal indomethacin reduces pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its added benefits in patients already receiving prophylactic pancreatic stenting. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of indomethacin in high-risk patients undergoing pancreatic stenting.
    METHODS: A cohort study was conducted on all patients who underwent the rescue cannulation technique for challenging bile duct cannulation (selected high-risk patients). Patients were split into two groups based on the prophylaxis method for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP): one receiving a combination of indomethacin and pancreatic stenting, while the other received pancreatic stenting alone. Comparative analyses were carried out on PEP, hyperamylasemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, and postoperative hospital stay among post-ERCP pancreatitis patients.
    RESULTS: Between November 2017 and May 2023, a total of 607 patients with native papillae were enrolled, with 140 grouped into the indomethacin plus stent group and 467 into the stent alone group. The overall PEP rate was 4.4% in the entire cohort, with no statistical differences observed between the groups in terms of PEP rates (P = 0.407), mild PEP (P = 0.340), moderate to severe PEP (P = 1.000), hyperamylasemia (P = 0.543), gastrointestinal bleeding (P = 0.392), and postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.521). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis using multivariable analysis also validated these findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Indomethacin did not reduce the incidence or severity of PEP in high-risk patients who routinely received prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Therefore, the additional administration of rectal indomethacin to further mitigate PEP appears to be not necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),具有创伤更小、恢复更快的临床优势,已成为胆总管结石的主要治疗方法。
    目的:探讨不同ERCP方法对Oddi括约肌的影响。
    方法:回顾性分析2018年2月至2021年2月宜兴市中医医院行ERCP的91例患者的临床资料。将患者分为内镜括约肌切开术(EST,n=24)和内窥镜乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD,n=67)组。操作的持续时间,胰腺发育,胰腺括约肌切开术,插管困难,结石复发,并对有胆总管结石病史的患者进行统计学分析,胰腺炎,EST和EPBD组的Oddi括约肌功能障碍。
    结果:高血压的差异,糖尿病,胆红素升高,胆总管直径小,或壶腹憩室两组间无显著性差异。两组在性别和年龄(<60岁)方面具有统计学上的显着差异。有胆总管结石病史的患者,胰腺炎,EST组Oddi括约肌功能障碍高于EPBD组。胰腺发育的病例数,胰管括约肌切开术,EST组插管困难率高于EPBD组。Oddi括约肌测数,ERCP手术结果,EST组多次进入胰管的导丝低于EPBD组。石头复发的数量,反流性胆管炎,EST组胆囊炎发生率高于EPBD组。
    结论:总之,胆总管结石,胰腺炎病史,胰管内多根导丝是EST和EPBD的独立危险因素。根据这些证据,这项研究可以为临床医生和研究人员提供可操作的见解.
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with its clinical ad-vantages of less trauma and faster recovery, has become the primary treatment for choledocholithiasis.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different ERCP procedures on the sphincter of Oddi.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 91 patients who underwent ERCP at Yixing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between February 2018 and February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST, n = 24) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD, n = 67) groups. The duration of operation, pancreatic development, pancreatic sphincterotomy, intubation difficulties, stone recurrence, and incidence of reflux cholangitis and cholecystitis were statistically analyzed in patients with a history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, and Oddi sphincter dysfunction in the EST and EPBD groups.
    RESULTS: Differences in hypertension, diabetes, increased bilirubin, small diameter of the common bile duct, or ampullary diverticulum between the two groups were not significant. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning sex and age (< 60 years). Patients with a history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, and Oddi sphincter dysfunction were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group. The number of cases of pancreatic development, pancreatic duct sphincterotomy, and difficult intubation were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group. The number of Oddi\'s sphincter manometries, ERCP surgical outcomes, and guidewires entering the pancreatic duct several times in EST group were lower than those in the EPBD group. The numbers of stone recurrences, reflux cholangitis, and cholecystitis were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, common bile duct stones, pancreatitis history, and multiple guided wire introductions into the pancreatic duct are independent risk factors for EST and EPBD. Based on this evidence, this study can provide actionable insights for clinicians and researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜治疗是肝移植后吻合口狭窄的一线治疗方法。尽管据报道,塑料支架治疗的最佳持续时间为8-12个月,在这种情况下,金属支架的安全性和持续时间的数据很少。由于在我们中心2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的使用有限,在具有合适解剖结构的患者中,Kaffes胆道导管内自膨式支架的使用和住院时间有所改变.这主要是由于与传统的塑料支架相比,Kaffes支架允许更长的留置期的理论益处。
    目的:比较使用Kaffes支架的不同支架置入持续时间的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在10年期间通过数据库查询对18岁及以上接受ERCP的成人肝移植受者进行回顾性鉴定。通过电子和扫描的医疗记录手动识别Kaffes支架插入后的计划外入院。主要结果是支架留置3个月和6个月时的并发症发生率。通过支架置入疗程≤120d或>120d的患者狭窄复发率计算支架疗效。
    结果:在研究期间,在54例患者的整个支架置入过程中,共进行了66例ERCPs和Kaffes置入.在33个ERCP中,每隔3个月取出或更换支架.没有胰腺炎,穿孔或死亡发生。在3个月(腹痛和导管内迁移)和6个月(腹痛,化粪池淋浴和嵌入式支架)组-分别为6.1%和9.1%,P=0.40。所有狭窄都在支架置入过程结束时解决,但支架置入过程在3~22个月不等.支架置入过程持续120d的复发率为71.4%,支架置入过程持续121d或以上的复发率为21.4%(P=0.03)。有28例患者接受了Kaffes的单一ERCP治疗,在120d后取出21例,在120d内取出7例。当在整个支架置入过程中使用单一ERCP时,在120d后取出Kaffes时,狭窄的复发显着改善(71.0%vs10.0%,P=0.01)。
    结论:使用单个Kaffes导管内完全覆盖的金属支架至少4个月对于处理移植后吻合口狭窄是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months, data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce. Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre, there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy. This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy profile of different stenting durations using Kaffes stents.
    METHODS: Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query. Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records. The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months. Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for ≤ 120 d or > 120 d.
    RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course. In 33 ERCPs, the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval. No pancreatitis, perforations or deaths occurred. Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month (abdominal pain and intraductal migration) and 6-month (abdominal pain, septic shower and embedded stent) groups - 6.1% vs 9.1% respectively, P = 0.40. All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course, but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months. The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4% and 21.4% for stenting courses of 121 d or over (P = 0.03). There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes, 21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d. There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course (71.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:促胰液素刺激磁共振(MR)成像(MR-PFTs)是一种基于体内分泌的肠液体积评估的胰腺外分泌功能的非侵入性测试。在临床护理和研究中采用这种方法在很大程度上仅限于对分泌物进行定性评估,因为当前的分泌反应量化方法需要对MR图像进行手动阈值和分割。这可能是耗时的,并且容易出现评分者之间的可变性。我们描述了对MR图像进行预处理和阈值的新颖软件(PFTquant),执行非肠液对象的启发式检测,并为用户提供直观的半自动工具,以快速和稳健的方式分割和量化肠液。我们评估了该软件在一组回顾性临床MRI上的性能。
    方法:20例儿童(<18岁)的MRI由两名观察者使用手动技术和PFTquant独立处理。使用组内相关系数比较了测得的分泌液体体积的评分者之间的一致性,Bland-Altman差异分析,和骰子相似系数。
    结果:使用PFTquant测量的肠液分泌的评估者间可靠性为0.90(0.76-0.9695%C.I.),平均差异为-4.5mL(-39.4-30.4mL95%一致界限),而手动处理为0.69(0.36-0.8695%C.I.),平均差异为-0.9mL(-77.3-75.5mL95%与手动处理(0.85+/-0.10)相比,使用PFTquant(0.88+/-0.06)的骰子相似性系数更好,但不显著(p=0.11)。与手动处理(645+/-305s)相比,使用PFTquant(412+/-177s)处理时间显著(p<0.001)更快。
    结论:新颖的软件提供了快速,对接受MR-PFTs的儿童分泌的液体量进行可靠的定量。新软件的使用可以促进定量MR-PFTs在临床护理和研究中的更广泛采用。
    OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with secretin stimulation (MR-PFTs) is a non-invasive test for pancreatic exocrine function based on assessing the volume of secreted bowel fluid in vivo. Adoption of this methodology in clinical care and research is largely limited to qualitative assessment of secretion as current methods for secretory response quantification require manual thresholding and segmentation of MR images, which can be time-consuming and prone to interrater variability. We describe novel software (PFTquant) that preprocesses and thresholds MR images, performs heuristic detection of non-bowel fluid objects, and provides the user with intuitive semi-automated tools to segment and quantify bowel fluid in a fast and robust manner. We evaluate the performance of this software on a retrospective set of clinical MRIs.
    METHODS: Twenty MRIs performed in children (< 18 years) were processed independently by two observers using a manual technique and using PFTquant. Interrater agreement in measured secreted fluid volume was compared using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman difference analysis, and Dice similarity coefficients.
    RESULTS: Interrater reliability of measured bowel fluid secretion using PFTquant was 0.90 (0.76-0.96 95% C.I.) with - 4.5 mL mean difference (-39.4-30.4 mL 95% limits of agreement) compared to 0.69 (0.36-0.86 95% C.I.) with - 0.9 mL mean difference (-77.3-75.5 mL 95% limits of agreement) for manual processing. Dice similarity coefficients were better using PFTquant (0.88 +/- 0.06) compared to manual processing (0.85 +/- 0.10) but not significantly (p = 0.11). Time to process was significantly (p < 0.001) faster using PFTquant (412 +/- 177 s) compared to manual processing (645 +/- 305 s).
    CONCLUSIONS: Novel software provides fast, reliable quantification of secreted fluid volume in children undergoing MR-PFTs. Use of the novel software could facilitate wider adoption of quantitative MR-PFTs in clinical care and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:内镜乳头切除术(EP)是壶腹肿瘤的首选治疗方法,因为它比手术切除副作用少。这项研究回顾性比较了一种新的锚定EP方法(A-EP)与常规(C-EP)方法。方法:回顾性分析了2009年至2021年在一家医疗机构接受EP的99例患者。在所有患者中,EP的适应症为病理腺瘤,胆管浸润<10mm,内镜超声检查肿瘤直径<30mm。排除标准为使用抗血小板/抗凝剂,以前的上消化道手术,或先前的胆道/胰腺内镜治疗。一位专家内窥镜医师进行了两种类型的EP,A-EP和C-EP。结果:62例患者行A-EP,37例接受了C-EP。基线特征没有显着差异,比如性,年龄,肿瘤大小,和内镜超声检查的导管侵犯。A-EP组的整体切除率较高(95.2%vs.78.4%,p=0.010)。尽管差异没有统计学意义,它倾向于减少胰腺炎(p=0.081)和导管狭窄(p=0.081)的发生率。A-EP组的复发率较低(8.1%vs.37.8%,p=0.000)。两组在随访期间无显著差异(A-EPvs.C-EP,725vs.1045天,p=0.109)或复发天数(A-EP与C-EP,341vs.562天,p=0.551)。结论:就整体切除率和复发率而言,A-EP比C-EP显示更好的结果。为这种新型EP方法的有效性提供了证据。
    Background/Objectives: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the preferred treatment for ampullary tumors because it has fewer side effects than surgical removal. This study retrospectively compared a new anchoring EP method (A-EP) with the conventional (C-EP) approach. Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent EP at a single medical institution between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, the indications for EP were pathological adenoma with <10 mm of biliary invasion and a tumor diameter <30 mm on endoscopic ultrasonography. The exclusion criteria were antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, previous upper GI surgery, or prior biliary/pancreatic endoscopic therapy. One expert endoscopist performed the two types of EPs, A-EP and C-EP. Results: Sixty-two patients underwent A-EP, and 37 underwent C-EP. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, tumor size, and ductal invasion on endoscopic ultrasound. The A-EP group had higher en bloc resection rates (95.2% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.010). Although the difference was not statistically significant, it tended towards fewer incidences of pancreatitis (p = 0.081) and duct stricture (p = 0.081). The recurrence rate was lower in the A-EP group (8.1% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.000). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the follow-up period (A-EP vs. C-EP, 725 vs. 1045 days, p = 0.109) or the days of recurrence (A-EP vs. C-EP, 341 vs. 562 days, p = 0.551). Conclusions: A-EP showed better outcomes than C-EP in terms of en bloc resection and recurrence rates, providing evidence for the efficacy of this novel EP method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是一种常见的手术,但它对手术改变胃肠解剖结构(SAGA)的患者提出了挑战。替代技术,如单气囊小肠镜检查(SBE),双气囊小肠镜(DBE),或使用推进式小肠镜检查(PE),尽管有潜在的并发症。关于SAGA患者ERCP并发症的拉丁美洲数据有限。我们的目标是在国家转诊机构描述SAGA中ERCP的并发症。
    方法:回顾性,单中心队列研究。包括2008年1月至2023年5月在美国国家医学科学与营养研究所SalvadorZubirán胃肠内窥镜检查部门进行的所有SAGAERCP程序。从记录中提取的数据包括程序细节,内窥镜类型,成功,和并发症。术中和术后28天评估并发症,并使用AGREE系统进行分类。
    结果:共纳入174例患者的266例手术,74%是女性,中位年龄为44岁。主要解剖改良为Roux-en-Y胆道重建(79%),其次是Whipple手术(13%)和胃大部切除术与Roux-en-Y重建(6.0%)。主要指征为胆管炎伴狭窄(31%),狭窄(19%),和胆管炎(19%)。89%使用DBE,PE在7.5%,SBE为3.4%。内镜成功率为77%,72%的技术,69%是治疗性的;在30%中,程序没有成功。18%的病例发生并发症,最常见的胆管炎(7.5%),其次是穿孔(2.6%)和出血(1.9%)。根据AGREE分类,10.9%为1级和2级,6.4%为3级,0.4%为4级并发症。有并发症和无并发症组之间没有显着差异。程序随着时间的推移而增加,但并发症和不成功的程序保持稳定。
    结论:ERCP并发症与国际数据一致,通常不需要侵入性治疗。增强暴露于此类病例与更少的并发症和失败相关。前瞻性研究对于确定并发症和失败预测因素至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common procedure, but it poses challenges in patients with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomy (SAGA). Alternative techniques like single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE), double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE), or push enteroscopy (PE) have been used, albeit with potential complications. Limited Latin American data exists on ERCP complications in SAGA patients. Our goal is to describe complications of ERCP in SAGA at a national referral institution.
    METHODS: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. All SAGA ERCP procedures performed at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Department of the National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán from January 2008 to May 2023 were included. Extracted data from records included procedure specifics, endoscope type, success, and complications. Complications were evaluated during procedure and 28-day post-procedure and classified using the AGREE system.
    RESULTS: A total of 266 procedures in 174 patients were included, 74% were women, and the median age was 44 years. Predominant modified anatomy was Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction (79%), followed by Whipple procedure (13%) and subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (6.0%). The main indications were cholangitis with stricture (31%), stricture (19%), and cholangitis (19%). DBE was used in 89%, PE in 7.5%, and SBE in 3.4%. Success rates were 77% endoscopic, 72% technical, and 69% therapeutic; in 30%, the procedure was unsuccessful. Complications happened in 18% of cases, most commonly cholangitis (7.5%), followed by perforation (2.6%) and hemorrhage (1.9%). According to the AGREE classification, 10.9% were grades 1 and 2, 6.4% were grade 3, and 0.4% were grade 4 complications. No significant differences emerged between groups with and without complications. Procedures increased over time, but complications and unsuccessful procedures remained stable.
    CONCLUSIONS: ERCP complications align with international data, often not requiring invasive treatment. Enhanced exposure to such cases correlates with fewer complications and failures. Prospective studies are essential to identify complication and failure predictors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全面了解肝外胆管解剖结构对于指导外科手术和进行内窥镜逆行胆管造影至关重要。肝外胆管解剖不规则可能增加胆管结石的易感性。
    目的:探讨胆总管结石患者肝外胆管解剖危险因素。特别关注预防手术干预和内镜碎石术后结石复发。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2022年10月在我们中心接受磁共振胰胆管造影检查的124例无胆总管结石患者和108例确诊胆总管结石患者的病历。采用Logistic回归分析确定影响胆总管结石发生率的解剖学危险因素。
    结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,几个因素独立地导致胆总管结石的风险。胆总管结石的重要独立危险因素是肝总直径[调整比值比(aOR)=1.43,95%置信区间(CI):1.07-1.92,调整P值=0.016]和胆总管(aOR=1.68,95CI:1.27-2.23,调整P值<0.001),总肝管长度(aOR=0.92,95CI:0.84-0.99,调整后P值=0.034),和胆总管角度(aOR=0.92,95CI:0.89-0.95,校正P值<0.001)。
    结论:肝外胆管的解剖特征与胆总管结石的风险直接相关。主要的危险因素包括肝脏和胆管的直径增大,总肝管的长度较短,胆总管的角度缩小了.
    BACKGROUND: A comprehensive understanding of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy is vital to guide surgical procedures and perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Anatomical irregularities within the extrahepatic bile duct may increase susceptibility to bile duct stones.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomical risk factors associated with extrahepatic bile ducts in patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis, with a specific focus on preventing stone recurrence after surgical intervention and endoscopic lithotomy.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 124 patients without choledocholithiasis and 108 with confirmed choledocholithiasis who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations at our center between January 2022 and October 2022. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the anatomical risk factors influencing the incidence of common bile duct stones.
    RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that several factors independently contributed to choledocholithiasis risk. Significant independent risk factors for choledocholithiasis were diameter of the common hepatic [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.92, adjusted P value = 0.016] and common bile (aOR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.27-2.23, adjusted P value < 0.001) ducts, length of the common hepatic duct (aOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.84-0.99, adjusted P value = 0.034), and angle of the common bile duct (aOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.89-0.95, adjusted P value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical features of the extrahepatic bile duct were directly associated with choledocholithiasis risk. Key risk factors include an enlarged diameter of the common hepatic and bile ducts, a shorter length of the common hepatic duct, and a reduced angle of the common bile duct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于肝功能检查异常,一名65岁的妇女被诊断出患有8厘米大的胆总管结石和两个肝内导管中的多发结石。在多学科方法之后,考虑手术切除,并在腹腔镜下切除胆总管结石后进行初次闭合。患者康复,无并发症,术后第4天出院。内镜下清除胆总管结石是标准治疗方法,但是通过腹腔镜胆总管探查手术切除也是这种巨大胆结石的安全有效的治疗方法。
    A 65-year-old woman was diagnosed with an 8 cm large common bile duct stone and multiple stones in both intrahepatic ducts because of abnormal liver function tests. After a multidisciplinary approach, surgical removal was considered, and primary closure after laparoscopic removal of the common bile duct stone was performed. The patient recovered without complications and was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones is the standard treatment, but surgical removal through laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is also a safe and effective treatment method for such huge gallstones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号