Cholangiopancreatography

胰胆管造影术
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术是全球范围内常见的手术之一,也是治疗胆结石的金标准。不可吸收的手术夹可能会滑动并迁移,从而导致各种问题。胆总管结石.
    作者报告了一例43岁女性,主诉上腹痛。7年前,她因症状性胆石症接受了胆囊切除术。腹部超声检查显示胆总管扩张,随后进行内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影。取回了带有金属夹的单个黑色石头。
    胆囊切除术后夹子迁移应被视为胆总管结石症的区别之一。腹部超声检查显示胆总管扩张。通过内镜逆行胰胆管造影术进行进一步的治疗。
    目前,作为胆总管结石病的手术夹很少见,但应该被视为腹部疼痛的区别之一。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the common surgeries occurring worldwide and the gold standard for the management of gallstone disease. The non-absorbable surgical clips may slip and can migrate causing a variety of problems as such, choledocholithiasis.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors report a case of 43-year-old female who presented with the complaint epigastric pain. She had undergone cholecystectomy 7 years back for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ultrasonography of the abdomen showed a dilated common bile duct following which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was done. A single black-colored stone with the metal clip was retrieved.
    UNASSIGNED: Post-cholecystectomy clip migration should be considered as one of the differentials for choledocholithiasis. Ultrasonography of the abdomen shows the dilated common bile duct. Further management is done by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical clips acting as nidus for choledocholithiasis is rare these days but should be considered as one of the differentials for pain abdomen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),具有创伤更小、恢复更快的临床优势,已成为胆总管结石的主要治疗方法。
    目的:探讨不同ERCP方法对Oddi括约肌的影响。
    方法:回顾性分析2018年2月至2021年2月宜兴市中医医院行ERCP的91例患者的临床资料。将患者分为内镜括约肌切开术(EST,n=24)和内窥镜乳头球囊扩张术(EPBD,n=67)组。操作的持续时间,胰腺发育,胰腺括约肌切开术,插管困难,结石复发,并对有胆总管结石病史的患者进行统计学分析,胰腺炎,EST和EPBD组的Oddi括约肌功能障碍。
    结果:高血压的差异,糖尿病,胆红素升高,胆总管直径小,或壶腹憩室两组间无显著性差异。两组在性别和年龄(<60岁)方面具有统计学上的显着差异。有胆总管结石病史的患者,胰腺炎,EST组Oddi括约肌功能障碍高于EPBD组。胰腺发育的病例数,胰管括约肌切开术,EST组插管困难率高于EPBD组。Oddi括约肌测数,ERCP手术结果,EST组多次进入胰管的导丝低于EPBD组。石头复发的数量,反流性胆管炎,EST组胆囊炎发生率高于EPBD组。
    结论:总之,胆总管结石,胰腺炎病史,胰管内多根导丝是EST和EPBD的独立危险因素。根据这些证据,这项研究可以为临床医生和研究人员提供可操作的见解.
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with its clinical ad-vantages of less trauma and faster recovery, has become the primary treatment for choledocholithiasis.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of different ERCP procedures on the sphincter of Oddi.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 91 patients who underwent ERCP at Yixing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between February 2018 and February 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST, n = 24) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD, n = 67) groups. The duration of operation, pancreatic development, pancreatic sphincterotomy, intubation difficulties, stone recurrence, and incidence of reflux cholangitis and cholecystitis were statistically analyzed in patients with a history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, and Oddi sphincter dysfunction in the EST and EPBD groups.
    RESULTS: Differences in hypertension, diabetes, increased bilirubin, small diameter of the common bile duct, or ampullary diverticulum between the two groups were not significant. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups concerning sex and age (< 60 years). Patients with a history of choledocholithiasis, pancreatitis, and Oddi sphincter dysfunction were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group. The number of cases of pancreatic development, pancreatic duct sphincterotomy, and difficult intubation were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group. The number of Oddi\'s sphincter manometries, ERCP surgical outcomes, and guidewires entering the pancreatic duct several times in EST group were lower than those in the EPBD group. The numbers of stone recurrences, reflux cholangitis, and cholecystitis were higher in the EST group than in the EPBD group.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, common bile duct stones, pancreatitis history, and multiple guided wire introductions into the pancreatic duct are independent risk factors for EST and EPBD. Based on this evidence, this study can provide actionable insights for clinicians and researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内镜治疗是肝移植后吻合口狭窄的一线治疗方法。尽管据报道,塑料支架治疗的最佳持续时间为8-12个月,在这种情况下,金属支架的安全性和持续时间的数据很少。由于在我们中心2019年冠状病毒疾病大流行期间,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的使用有限,在具有合适解剖结构的患者中,Kaffes胆道导管内自膨式支架的使用和住院时间有所改变.这主要是由于与传统的塑料支架相比,Kaffes支架允许更长的留置期的理论益处。
    目的:比较使用Kaffes支架的不同支架置入持续时间的安全性和有效性。
    方法:在10年期间通过数据库查询对18岁及以上接受ERCP的成人肝移植受者进行回顾性鉴定。通过电子和扫描的医疗记录手动识别Kaffes支架插入后的计划外入院。主要结果是支架留置3个月和6个月时的并发症发生率。通过支架置入疗程≤120d或>120d的患者狭窄复发率计算支架疗效。
    结果:在研究期间,在54例患者的整个支架置入过程中,共进行了66例ERCPs和Kaffes置入.在33个ERCP中,每隔3个月取出或更换支架.没有胰腺炎,穿孔或死亡发生。在3个月(腹痛和导管内迁移)和6个月(腹痛,化粪池淋浴和嵌入式支架)组-分别为6.1%和9.1%,P=0.40。所有狭窄都在支架置入过程结束时解决,但支架置入过程在3~22个月不等.支架置入过程持续120d的复发率为71.4%,支架置入过程持续121d或以上的复发率为21.4%(P=0.03)。有28例患者接受了Kaffes的单一ERCP治疗,在120d后取出21例,在120d内取出7例。当在整个支架置入过程中使用单一ERCP时,在120d后取出Kaffes时,狭窄的复发显着改善(71.0%vs10.0%,P=0.01)。
    结论:使用单个Kaffes导管内完全覆盖的金属支架至少4个月对于处理移植后吻合口狭窄是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND: Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anastomotic strictures. Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months, data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce. Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre, there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy. This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy profile of different stenting durations using Kaffes stents.
    METHODS: Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query. Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records. The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months. Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for ≤ 120 d or > 120 d.
    RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course. In 33 ERCPs, the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval. No pancreatitis, perforations or deaths occurred. Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month (abdominal pain and intraductal migration) and 6-month (abdominal pain, septic shower and embedded stent) groups - 6.1% vs 9.1% respectively, P = 0.40. All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course, but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months. The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4% and 21.4% for stenting courses of 121 d or over (P = 0.03). There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes, 21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d. There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course (71.0% vs 10.0%, P = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:促胰液素刺激磁共振(MR)成像(MR-PFTs)是一种基于体内分泌的肠液体积评估的胰腺外分泌功能的非侵入性测试。在临床护理和研究中采用这种方法在很大程度上仅限于对分泌物进行定性评估,因为当前的分泌反应量化方法需要对MR图像进行手动阈值和分割。这可能是耗时的,并且容易出现评分者之间的可变性。我们描述了对MR图像进行预处理和阈值的新颖软件(PFTquant),执行非肠液对象的启发式检测,并为用户提供直观的半自动工具,以快速和稳健的方式分割和量化肠液。我们评估了该软件在一组回顾性临床MRI上的性能。
    方法:20例儿童(<18岁)的MRI由两名观察者使用手动技术和PFTquant独立处理。使用组内相关系数比较了测得的分泌液体体积的评分者之间的一致性,Bland-Altman差异分析,和骰子相似系数。
    结果:使用PFTquant测量的肠液分泌的评估者间可靠性为0.90(0.76-0.9695%C.I.),平均差异为-4.5mL(-39.4-30.4mL95%一致界限),而手动处理为0.69(0.36-0.8695%C.I.),平均差异为-0.9mL(-77.3-75.5mL95%与手动处理(0.85+/-0.10)相比,使用PFTquant(0.88+/-0.06)的骰子相似性系数更好,但不显著(p=0.11)。与手动处理(645+/-305s)相比,使用PFTquant(412+/-177s)处理时间显著(p<0.001)更快。
    结论:新颖的软件提供了快速,对接受MR-PFTs的儿童分泌的液体量进行可靠的定量。新软件的使用可以促进定量MR-PFTs在临床护理和研究中的更广泛采用。
    OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with secretin stimulation (MR-PFTs) is a non-invasive test for pancreatic exocrine function based on assessing the volume of secreted bowel fluid in vivo. Adoption of this methodology in clinical care and research is largely limited to qualitative assessment of secretion as current methods for secretory response quantification require manual thresholding and segmentation of MR images, which can be time-consuming and prone to interrater variability. We describe novel software (PFTquant) that preprocesses and thresholds MR images, performs heuristic detection of non-bowel fluid objects, and provides the user with intuitive semi-automated tools to segment and quantify bowel fluid in a fast and robust manner. We evaluate the performance of this software on a retrospective set of clinical MRIs.
    METHODS: Twenty MRIs performed in children (< 18 years) were processed independently by two observers using a manual technique and using PFTquant. Interrater agreement in measured secreted fluid volume was compared using intraclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman difference analysis, and Dice similarity coefficients.
    RESULTS: Interrater reliability of measured bowel fluid secretion using PFTquant was 0.90 (0.76-0.96 95% C.I.) with - 4.5 mL mean difference (-39.4-30.4 mL 95% limits of agreement) compared to 0.69 (0.36-0.86 95% C.I.) with - 0.9 mL mean difference (-77.3-75.5 mL 95% limits of agreement) for manual processing. Dice similarity coefficients were better using PFTquant (0.88 +/- 0.06) compared to manual processing (0.85 +/- 0.10) but not significantly (p = 0.11). Time to process was significantly (p < 0.001) faster using PFTquant (412 +/- 177 s) compared to manual processing (645 +/- 305 s).
    CONCLUSIONS: Novel software provides fast, reliable quantification of secreted fluid volume in children undergoing MR-PFTs. Use of the novel software could facilitate wider adoption of quantitative MR-PFTs in clinical care and research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景/目的:内镜乳头切除术(EP)是壶腹肿瘤的首选治疗方法,因为它比手术切除副作用少。这项研究回顾性比较了一种新的锚定EP方法(A-EP)与常规(C-EP)方法。方法:回顾性分析了2009年至2021年在一家医疗机构接受EP的99例患者。在所有患者中,EP的适应症为病理腺瘤,胆管浸润<10mm,内镜超声检查肿瘤直径<30mm。排除标准为使用抗血小板/抗凝剂,以前的上消化道手术,或先前的胆道/胰腺内镜治疗。一位专家内窥镜医师进行了两种类型的EP,A-EP和C-EP。结果:62例患者行A-EP,37例接受了C-EP。基线特征没有显着差异,比如性,年龄,肿瘤大小,和内镜超声检查的导管侵犯。A-EP组的整体切除率较高(95.2%vs.78.4%,p=0.010)。尽管差异没有统计学意义,它倾向于减少胰腺炎(p=0.081)和导管狭窄(p=0.081)的发生率。A-EP组的复发率较低(8.1%vs.37.8%,p=0.000)。两组在随访期间无显著差异(A-EPvs.C-EP,725vs.1045天,p=0.109)或复发天数(A-EP与C-EP,341vs.562天,p=0.551)。结论:就整体切除率和复发率而言,A-EP比C-EP显示更好的结果。为这种新型EP方法的有效性提供了证据。
    Background/Objectives: Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the preferred treatment for ampullary tumors because it has fewer side effects than surgical removal. This study retrospectively compared a new anchoring EP method (A-EP) with the conventional (C-EP) approach. Methods: Ninety-nine patients who underwent EP at a single medical institution between 2009 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. In all patients, the indications for EP were pathological adenoma with <10 mm of biliary invasion and a tumor diameter <30 mm on endoscopic ultrasonography. The exclusion criteria were antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, previous upper GI surgery, or prior biliary/pancreatic endoscopic therapy. One expert endoscopist performed the two types of EPs, A-EP and C-EP. Results: Sixty-two patients underwent A-EP, and 37 underwent C-EP. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, tumor size, and ductal invasion on endoscopic ultrasound. The A-EP group had higher en bloc resection rates (95.2% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.010). Although the difference was not statistically significant, it tended towards fewer incidences of pancreatitis (p = 0.081) and duct stricture (p = 0.081). The recurrence rate was lower in the A-EP group (8.1% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.000). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the follow-up period (A-EP vs. C-EP, 725 vs. 1045 days, p = 0.109) or the days of recurrence (A-EP vs. C-EP, 341 vs. 562 days, p = 0.551). Conclusions: A-EP showed better outcomes than C-EP in terms of en bloc resection and recurrence rates, providing evidence for the efficacy of this novel EP method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全面了解肝外胆管解剖结构对于指导外科手术和进行内窥镜逆行胆管造影至关重要。肝外胆管解剖不规则可能增加胆管结石的易感性。
    目的:探讨胆总管结石患者肝外胆管解剖危险因素。特别关注预防手术干预和内镜碎石术后结石复发。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2022年10月在我们中心接受磁共振胰胆管造影检查的124例无胆总管结石患者和108例确诊胆总管结石患者的病历。采用Logistic回归分析确定影响胆总管结石发生率的解剖学危险因素。
    结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,几个因素独立地导致胆总管结石的风险。胆总管结石的重要独立危险因素是肝总直径[调整比值比(aOR)=1.43,95%置信区间(CI):1.07-1.92,调整P值=0.016]和胆总管(aOR=1.68,95CI:1.27-2.23,调整P值<0.001),总肝管长度(aOR=0.92,95CI:0.84-0.99,调整后P值=0.034),和胆总管角度(aOR=0.92,95CI:0.89-0.95,校正P值<0.001)。
    结论:肝外胆管的解剖特征与胆总管结石的风险直接相关。主要的危险因素包括肝脏和胆管的直径增大,总肝管的长度较短,胆总管的角度缩小了.
    BACKGROUND: A comprehensive understanding of the extrahepatic bile duct anatomy is vital to guide surgical procedures and perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Anatomical irregularities within the extrahepatic bile duct may increase susceptibility to bile duct stones.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the anatomical risk factors associated with extrahepatic bile ducts in patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis, with a specific focus on preventing stone recurrence after surgical intervention and endoscopic lithotomy.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 124 patients without choledocholithiasis and 108 with confirmed choledocholithiasis who underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography examinations at our center between January 2022 and October 2022. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the anatomical risk factors influencing the incidence of common bile duct stones.
    RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that several factors independently contributed to choledocholithiasis risk. Significant independent risk factors for choledocholithiasis were diameter of the common hepatic [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.92, adjusted P value = 0.016] and common bile (aOR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.27-2.23, adjusted P value < 0.001) ducts, length of the common hepatic duct (aOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.84-0.99, adjusted P value = 0.034), and angle of the common bile duct (aOR = 0.92, 95%CI: 0.89-0.95, adjusted P value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical features of the extrahepatic bile duct were directly associated with choledocholithiasis risk. Key risk factors include an enlarged diameter of the common hepatic and bile ducts, a shorter length of the common hepatic duct, and a reduced angle of the common bile duct.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the usefulness of Anali scores, determined by magnetic resonance imaging, for predicting the prognosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and to analyze interobserver variability, as well as to assess the impact of periportal edema and heterogeneous signal intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study of 29 patients with PSC and baseline magnetic resonance imaging. Anali scores, without gadolinium (0-5 points) and with gadolinium (0-2 points), were calculated by two radiologists. Clinical end-points included liver transplantation, cirrhotic decompensation, and death. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for interobserver agreement on the Anali scores, performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis comparing event-free survival among the score strata, and calculated the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves to determine sensitivity and specificity.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the patients with a clinical event, the median Anali score was 4 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5) without gadolinium and 2 (IQR, 1-2) with gadolinium, compared with 1 (IQR, 1.0-2.5) and 1 (IQR, 0.25-1.0), respectively, among those without a clinical event. The ICC was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.91) for the Anali score with gadolinium and 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-0.99) for the Anali score without gadolinium. Periportal edema and heterogeneous signal intensity in the liver on diffusion-weighted imaging showed no statistical impact on clinical events (p = 0.65 and p = 0.5, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Anali scores correlate with clinical events in PSC, with a high level of interobserver agreement.
    UNASSIGNED: Avaliar a utilidade dos escores Anali determinados por ressonância magnética para prever o prognóstico da colangite esclerosante primária (CEP), analisar a variabilidade interobservador e avaliar o impacto do edema periportal e do sinal heterogêneo do fígado em imagens ponderadas por difusão.
    UNASSIGNED: Estudo retrospectivo de coorte de 29 pacientes com CEP e ressonância magnética de base. Os escores Anali sem gadolínio (0 a 5 pontos) e com gadolínio (0 a 2 pontos) foram calculados por dois radiologistas. Os desfechos clínicos incluíram transplante de fígado, descompensação cirrótica ou morte. Foram realizados coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (CCI) para a concordância interobservador com relação ao escore Anali, análise de sobrevivência de Kaplan-Meier comparando o tempo livre de eventos de acordo com o escore, e área sob a curva característica de operação do receptor para sensibilidade e especificidade.
    UNASSIGNED: Nos pacientes com evento clínico, a mediana do escore Anali sem gadolínio foi 4 (intervalo interquartil [IIQ]: 2–5) e com gadolínio foi 2 (IIQ: 1–2), enquanto nos pacientes sem evento clínico o escore sem gadolínio foi 1 (IIQ:1–2,5) e com gadolínio foi 1 (IIQ: 0,25–1). A concordância interobservador com gadolínio foi CCI = 0,79 (intervalo de confiança 95%: 0,57–0,91) e sem gadolínio foi CCI = 0,99 (intervalo de confiança 95%: 0,98-0,99). O edema periportal (p = 0,65) e o sinal heterogêneo do fígado nas imagens ponderadas por difusão (p = 0,5) não apresentaram impacto nos eventos clínicos.
    UNASSIGNED: Os escores Anali se correlacionam com eventos clínicos na CEP, com alto grau de concordância interobservador.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是一种需要丰富经验和技能的手术,并且具有各种手术相关并发症。其中一些可能很严重,甚至导致患者死亡。扩大ERCP可用性具有增加患者可及性的优势。然而,如果没有适当的质量管理,ERCP会带来很大的风险。ERCP质量管理对于确保安全和成功的程序以及满足社会对增强医疗保健竞争力和质量保证的需求至关重要。为了解决这些问题,韩国胰胆管协会成立了一个特别工作组,负责制定针对韩国医疗环境的ERCP质量指标(QI).五个术前的关键问题,三个过程中,根据与ERCPQIs相关的文献检索和专家进行的全面临床审查,制定了四项术后措施。关于每个QI项目的陈述和建议是通过同行评审选择的。外部专家根据开发时的最新证据对开发的ERCPQIs进行了审查。这些国内定制的ERCPQIs预计将大大有助于提高韩国的ERCP质量。
    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a procedure that requires significant experiences and skills and has various procedure-related complications, some of which can be severe and even result in the death of patients. Expanding ERCP availability has the advantage of increasing accessibility for patients. However, ERCP poses a substantial risk if performed without proper quality management. ERCP quality management is essential for both ensuring safe and successful procedures and meeting the social demands for enhanced healthcare competitiveness and quality assurance. To address these concerns, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association established a task force to develop ERCP quality indicators (QIs) tailored to the Korean medical environment. Key questions for five pre-procedure, three intra-procedure, and four post-procedure measures were formulated based on a literature search related to ERCP QIs and a comprehensive clinical review conducted by experts. The statements and recommendations regarding each QI item were selected through peer review. The developed ERCP QIs were reviewed by external experts based on the latest available evidence at the time of development. These domestically tailored ERCP QIs are expected to contribute considerably to improving ERCP quality in Korea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管对PEP进行了大量研究,但与严重至致命的内镜后逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)胰腺炎(PEP)相关的预后因素仍不清楚。总的来说,从2017年4月至2018年3月,在36个中心前瞻性招募了3739例ERCP患者,这些患者具有完整的乳头并且需要进行ERCP。在ERCP前诊断为急性胰腺炎者,改变胃肠解剖结构,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状况>4被排除。对患者相关因素进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,运营商相关因素,与程序相关的因素,和预防措施,以确定严重至致命PEP的潜在预后因素。多因素分析显示胰导丝辅助胆道插管(OR13.59,95%CI4.21-43.83,p<0.001),ERCP后非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)给药(OR11.54,95%CI3.83-34.81,p<0.001),和既往胰腺炎(OR6.94,95%CI1.45-33.33,p=0.015)是严重至致死性PEP的重要危险因素。预防措施包括内镜下胆道括约肌切开术(EST;OR0.29,95%CI,0.11-0.79,p=0.015)和预防性胰腺支架(PPSs;OR0.11,95%CI,0.01-0.87,p=0.036)。在胆道ERCP中,胰导丝辅助胆道插管,ERCP后的NSAID给药,和先前的胰腺炎是严重至致命的PEP的危险因素,而EST和PPS是严重至致死性PEP的重要预防措施。
    The prognostic factors associated with severe-to-fatal post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) remain unclear despite the extensive number of studies on PEP. In total, 3739 ERCP patients with biliary disease with an intact papilla and indicated for ERCP were prospectively enrolled at 36 centers from April 2017 to March 2018. Those with acute pancreatitis diagnosed before ERCP, altered gastrointestinal anatomy, and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status > 4 were excluded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on patient-related factors, operator-related factors, procedure-related factors, and preventive measures to identify potential prognostic factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Multivariate analyses revealed pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation (OR 13.59, 95% CI 4.21-43.83, p < 0.001), post-ERCP non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) administration (OR 11.54, 95% CI 3.83-34.81, p < 0.001), and previous pancreatitis (OR 6.94, 95% CI 1.45-33.33, p = 0.015) as significant risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP. Preventive measures included endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EST; OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.11-0.79, p = 0.015) and prophylactic pancreatic stents (PPSs; OR 0.11, 95% CI, 0.01-0.87, p = 0.036). In biliary ERCP, pancreatic guidewire-assisted biliary cannulation, NSAID administration after ERCP, and previous pancreatitis were risk factors for severe-to-fatal PEP, whereas EST and PPS were significant preventive measures for severe-to-fatal PEP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺的外分泌部分具有称为胰腺导管系统(PDS)的导管系统。其发展机制复杂,早期胚胎发生过程中的任何重组都会产生解剖学变异。本研究的目的是收集,分类,并分析已发表的关于PDS解剖学变体重要性的证据,解决我们对这种变化的理解中的差距。MEDLINE,WebofScience,Embase,和谷歌学者数据库进行了搜索,以确定与本评论相关的出版物。使用带有元包的R工作室进行数据提取,偏差风险估计,和统计分析。在1,778项研究中,共有64项研究被证明适合本综述和元分析。荟萃分析计算了PDS正常变异的患病率(10,514名受试者中的92%)。在合并的样本中,主胰管(MPD)的3型变体和“下降型”亚型占主导地位。MPD和副胰管(APD)的平均长度为16.53cm和3.36cm,分别。头部MPD和APD的平均直径分别为3.43mm和1.69mm,分别。只有41%的样本存在APD,长型占主导地位。胰腺导管解剖是高度可变的,和不正确的识别变异可能是具有挑战性的外科医生在导管吻合与肠,失败通常可能导致导管阻塞或假性囊肿形成。
    The exocrine part of the pancreas has a duct system called the pancreatic ductal system (PDS). Its mechanism of development is complex, and any reorganization during early embryogenesis can give rise to anatomical variants. The aim of this study is to collect, classify, and analyze published evidence on the importance of anatomical variants of the PDS, addressing gaps in our understanding of such variations. The MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify publications relevant to this review. R studio with meta-package was used for data extraction, risk of bias estimation, and statistical analysis. A total of 64 studies out of 1,778 proved suitable for this review and metanalysis. The meta-analysis computed the prevalence of normal variants of the PDS (92% of 10,514 subjects). Type 3 variants and \"descending\" subtypes of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) predominated in the pooled samples. The mean lengths of the MPD and accessory pancreatic duct (APD) were 16.53 cm and 3.36 cm, respectively. The mean diameters of the MPD at the head and the APD were 3.43 mm and 1.69 mm, respectively. The APD was present in only 41% of samples, and the long type predominated. The pancreatic ductal anatomy is highly variable, and the incorrect identification of variants may be challenging for surgeons during ductal anastomosis with gut, failure to which may often cause ductal obstruction or pseudocysts formation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号