visual field.

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    回顾关于间接外伤性视神经病变(TON)的内科和外科治疗的疗效和安全性的文献,定义为视神经头远端发生的神经损伤。
    于2019年10月22日进行了文献检索,并于2020年4月8日在PubMed数据库中进行了更新,用于评估各种干预措施对间接TON的影响。确定了一百七十二篇文章;41篇符合评估概述的纳入标准,并被选中进行全文审查和抽象。关于全文审查,共有32项研究符合所有研究标准,并被纳入分析.
    没有研究符合I级证据的标准。7项研究(1项II级研究和6项III级研究)探索了皮质类固醇治疗,其结果均未优于观察。20项研究(3项II级研究和17项III级研究)评估了视神经管减压和皮质类固醇的使用。尽管在减压后观察到视觉改善,直接比较手术与药物治疗的研究未报告减压后结局的统一改善.四项研究(1项II级研究和3项III级研究)评估了促红细胞生成素的使用。尽管最初的研究证明了益处,将其使用与观察和皮质类固醇的直接比较未能证实该药物的有效性。一项研究(II级)记录了左旋多巴加卡比多巴的视力改善。所有这些干预措施的并发症发生率都是可变的。药物干预通常与很少的并发症相关,而光学管减压有严重副作用的风险,包括出血和脑脊液漏.
    尽管有皮质类固醇的视力改善的报道,视神经管减压术,和间接TON的药物治疗,已发表的证据的权重未证明这些干预措施中的任何一项都具有一致的获益.总之,迄今为止发表的关于TON首选治疗的研究尚未达成共识.应针对每个患者定制治疗策略。需要更明确的治疗试验来确定间接TON的最佳治疗策略。
    To review the literature on the efficacy and safety of medical and surgical interventions for indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (TON), defined as injury to the nerve that occurs distal to the optic nerve head.
    A literature search was conducted on October 22, 2019, and updated on April 8, 2020, in the PubMed database for English language original research that assessed the effect of various interventions for indirect TON. One hundred seventy-two articles were identified; 41 met the inclusion criteria outlined for assessment and were selected for full-text review and abstraction. On full-text review, a total of 32 studies met all of the study criteria and were included in the analysis.
    No study met criteria for level I evidence. Seven studies (1 level II study and 6 level III studies) explored corticosteroid therapy that did not have uniformly better outcomes than observation. Twenty studies (3 level II studies and 17 level III studies) assessed optic canal decompression and the use of corticosteroids. Although visual improvement was noted after decompression, studies that directly compared surgery with medical therapy did not report uniformly improved outcomes after decompression. Four studies (1 level II study and 3 level III studies) evaluated the use of erythropoietin. Although initial studies demonstrated benefit, a direct comparison of its use with observation and corticosteroids failed to confirm the usefulness of this medication. One study (level II) documented visual improvement with levodopa plus carbidopa. Complication rates were variable with all of these interventions. Pharmacologic interventions generally were associated with few complications, whereas optical canal decompression carried risks of serious side effects, including hemorrhages and cerebrospinal fluid leakage.
    Despite reports of visual improvement with corticosteroids, optic canal decompression, and medical therapy for indirect TON, the weight of published evidence does not demonstrate a consistent benefit for any of these interventions. In summary, no consensus exists from studies published to date on a preferred treatment for TON. Treatment strategies should be customized for each individual patient. More definitive treatment trials will be needed to identify optimal treatment strategies for indirect TON.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    Leber的遗传性视神经病是一种遗传性线粒体疾病。到目前为止,还没有建立有效的治疗方法,目前基因治疗是最有前途的。因为这种疾病有自发视力恢复的可能性,我们在基因治疗前筛查患者,不包括那些自发视力改善的人,并为随后的基因治疗做准备。
    在基因治疗前6个月临床观察Leber遗传性视神经病变的病程。
    66例Leber遗传性视神经病变患者纳入研究。根据疾病持续时间对患者进行分类:少于24个月和超过24个月。在1年内进行了三次临床随访检查。我们评估了眼压,视敏度,视野,视网膜神经纤维层厚度,眼底照片,和视觉诱发电位。
    八十二只眼睛显示出稳定的视力,包括34例患者的双眼和14例患者的一只眼;22例患者的33只眼显示视力下降(少于24个月:24只眼;超过24个月:9只眼);12例患者的17只眼显示视力改善(少于24个月:4只眼;超过24个月:13只眼)。视力和视野指数在疾病发作后的24个月内下降,并在24个月后保持稳定。
    大多数Leber遗传性视神经病变患者随着发病时间的延长,视功能逐渐稳定,自发视力恢复的可能性较低,为今后评估基因治疗的有效性提供了依据。
    Leber\'s hereditary optic neuropathy is a hereditary mitochondrial disease. No effective treatment has so far been established, with gene therapy currently being the most promising. Because of the possibility of spontaneous visual acuity recovery in this disease, we screened patients before gene therapy, excluding those with spontaneous visual acuity improvement, and prepared for the subsequent gene therapy.
    To clinically observe the course of Leber\'s hereditary optic neuropathy for 6 months prior to gene therapy.
    Sixty-six patients with Leber\'s hereditary optic neuropathy were enrolled in the study. Patients were classified based on the duration of disease: less than 24 months and over 24 months. Three clinical follow-up examinations were conducted over 1 year. We assessed intraocular pressure, visual acuity, visual field, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, fundus photographs, and visual evoked potential.
    Eighty-two eyes displayed stable visual acuity, including both eyes in 34 patients and one eye in 14 patients; 33 eyes of 22 patients displayed decrease in visual acuity (less than 24 months: 24 eyes; over 24 months: nine eyes); and 17 eyes of 12 patients showed improvement in visual acuity (less than 24 months: four eyes; over 24 months: 13 eyes). Visual acuity and visual field indices decreased over 24 months from disease onset and appeared stable after 24 months.
    Most patients with Leber\'s hereditary optic neuropathy gradually stabilize visual function with prolonged onset time, and the lower possibility of spontaneous vision recovery provides a basis for future evaluation of the effectiveness of gene therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号