treatment-free remission

免治疗缓解
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ABL1酪氨酸激酶抑制剂停药已成为慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期患者(CML-CP)的治疗目标之一。建立无治疗缓解(TFR)的成功预后因素,有必要诊断高风险分子复发的患者,然而,尚未完全阐明实现TFR的生物标志物。最近的研究已经确定中性粒细胞在癌症免疫学中起着至关重要的作用。
    方法:本研究是一项多中心回顾性观察研究,目的是检查TKI停药前TFR与中性粒细胞计数之间的相关性。调查包括费城染色体阳性CML-CP的患者,他们在2012年1月至2021年7月期间在日本的四家机构进行了持久的深层分子反应后,试图停用TKIs。
    结果:118例CML-CP患者中,TKIs停止,估计36个月的TFR率为65.1%。52例患者接受了第二代TKIs作为前线治疗。在接受第二代TKIs作为前线[(HR,0.235(95%,置信区间(CI)0.078-0.711);p=0.010]。
    结论:我们的临床观察支持,中性粒细胞介导的免疫调节可能是CML中有效实现TFR的重要组成部分。
    BACKGROUND: ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation securely became among the therapeutic goal for chronic myeloid leukemia chronic phase patients (CML-CP). To establish successful prognostic factors for treatment-free remission (TFR), it is necessary to diagnose the patients with high-risk molecular relapse, however, a biomarker for the achievement of TFR has not been completely elucidated. Recent investigations have determined that neutrophils function crucially in cancer immunology.
    METHODS: The research was a multicenter retrospective observational study to examine the correlation between TFR and neutrophil counts before TKI discontinuation. The investigation included patients having Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML-CP who attempted the discontinuation of TKIs after a durable deep molecular response between January 2012 and July 2021 at four institutions in Japan.
    RESULTS: 118 CML-CP patients in total discontinued TKIs and an estimated 36-month TFR rate was 65.1%. 52 patients received second-generation TKIs as frontline. Higher neutrophil count (>3210/μL) at TKIs discontinuation was determined as an independent prognostic variable for TFR in patients who received second-generation TKIs as frontline [(HR, 0.235 (95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.078-0.711); p = 0.010].
    CONCLUSIONS: The neutrophil-mediated immunomodulation can be a significant component for the effective achievement of TFR in CML supported by our clinical observation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的发现,慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的总生存期目前接近普通人群.虽然这些TKIs被证明是救命的,终生留在他们身上会给患者带来身体和经济负担。最近,多项试验已经开始研究对这些TKIs患者进行试验的疗效,以观察他们是否能够维持无治疗缓解(TFR).TFR资格目前仅限于对TKIs具有稳健和持续反应的一小部分患者。目前,对于那些试图审判TFR的人来说,平均成功率很有希望,有38%至54%的患者经历持续的TFR。对于那些无法保持持续TFR的人,迄今为止的安全结果令人放心,几乎所有患者都成功地对TKIs的重新开始作出反应,死亡和疾病进展是非常罕见的并发症。往前走,目前正在进行研究,以便在诊断时更准确地对患者进行风险分层,并将其与旨在提高TFR试验候选资格的优化前期治疗方案配对.
    With the discovery of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), overall survival in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) now approaches that of the general population. While these TKIs have proven to be lifesaving, remaining on them lifelong creates both physical and financial burdens for patients. Recently, multiple trials have begun looking into the efficacy of trialing patients off these TKIs to see if they can sustain treatment-free remission (TFR). TFR eligibility is currently limited to a small population of patients with both robust and sustained responses to TKIs. Currently, for those who attempt a trial of TFR, the average success rates are promising, with anywhere from 38 to 54% of patients experiencing sustained TFR. For those who fail to maintain sustained TFR, safety results to date are reassuring, with almost all patients successfully responding to the re-initiation of TKIs, with death and disease progression being very rare complications. Moving forward, research is being conducted to more accurately risk stratify patients at diagnosis and pair them with optimized upfront treatment regimens aimed at increasing candidacy for the trial of TFR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)已从标准护理转变为仅限于酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)反应和晚期疾病阶段的治疗选择。近年来,接受HSCT的阈值增加了。现在大多数CML患者的预期寿命与普通人群相当,因此,治疗的目标正在转向实现无治疗缓解(TFR).虽然CML中的TKI停药试验显示出实现TFR的潜力,复发风险很高,确认同种异体HSCT是唯一的治愈性治疗。从诊断开始,HSCT应纳入治疗算法,在一些患者中,尽快评估。在这次审查中,我们将看看HSCT的一些最新进展,以及它在CML中存在TKIs的情况下瞄准TFR的时代的指示。
    Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients has transitioned from the standard of care to a treatment option limited to those with unsatisfactory tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) responses and advanced disease stages. In recent years, the threshold for undergoing HSCT has increased. Most CML patients now have life expectancies comparable to the general population, and therefore, the goal of therapy is shifting toward achieving treatment-free remission (TFR). While TKI discontinuation trials in CML show potential for achieving TFR, relapse risk is high, affirming allogeneic HSCT as the sole curative treatment. HSCT should be incorporated into treatment algorithms from the time of diagnosis and, in some patients, evaluated as soon as possible. In this review, we will look at some of the recent advances in HSCT, as well as its indication in the era of aiming for TFR in the presence of TKIs in CML.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)与强化化疗的组合改善了费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ALL)的总生存期(OS)。近年来,在没有异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)或维持治疗的情况下,人们对长期存活的可能性越来越感兴趣.本研究的目的是使用真实世界数据确定Ph+ALL患者的治疗效果和结果。方法我们利用秋田大学医院的数据进行了单中心回顾性分析(秋田,日本)从2000年11月至2023年6月评估TKI联合强化化疗治疗Ph+ALL的结果。结果23例Ph+ALL患者采用强化化疗联合TKI治疗,包括六个伊马替尼,四个达沙替尼,和13普纳替尼。患者年龄中位数为53岁(范围;28-67)。18名患者(78%)在三个月内实现了完全分子缓解(CMR)。16例患者(70%)进行了HSCT,所有患者均未接受移植后TKI维持治疗.7例未接受HSCT的患者中有6例在强化化疗后接受了ponatinib维持治疗。三年OS为81%。Ponatinib治疗的OS率远高于伊马替尼/达沙替尼(100%vs.60%;P=0.011)。三个月内的CMR被确定为分子无复发生存的预后因素(风险比(HR)=0.22;P=0.027)。CD20阳性被确定为血液学复发的危险因素(HR=5.2,P=0.032)。结论即使在单中心队列研究中,普纳替尼,作为TKI与强化化疗或维持治疗的组合,可能改善Ph+ALL的预后。三个月内患有CMR的患者可能不一定需要接受HSCT,但只有通过HSCT才能实现随后的无治疗状态.此外,CD20阳性可能是Ph+ALL患者未来治疗决策的有用生物标志物。
    Introduction The overall survival (OS) of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) has improved with the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with intensive chemotherapy. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the possibility of long-term survival without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of treatment and the resultant outcomes in Ph+ALL patients using real-world data. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective analysis utilizing Akita University Hospital data (Akita, Japan) from November 2000 to June 2023 to evaluate the outcomes of TKI with intensive chemotherapy for Ph+ALL. Results Twenty-three patients with Ph+ALL were treated with intensive chemotherapy combined with TKI, including six imatinib, four dasatinib, and 13 ponatinib. The median patient age was 53 years (range; 28-67). Eighteen patients (78%) achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) within three months. HSCT was performed in 16 patients (70%), all of whom did not receive post-transplant TKI maintenance therapy. Six of the seven patients who did not undergo HSCT received maintenance therapy with ponatinib after intensive chemotherapy. The three-year OS was 81%. Ponatinib treatment resulted in a much higher OS rate than imatinib/dasatinib (100% vs. 60%; P=0.011). CMR within three months was identified as a prognostic factor for molecular relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR)=0.22; P=0.027). CD20 positivity was identified as a risk factor for hematological relapse (HR=5.2, P=0.032). Conclusion Even in a single-center cohort study, ponatinib, as a combination TKI with intensive chemotherapy or maintenance therapy, may improve the prognosis of Ph+ALL. Patients with CMR within three months might not necessarily need to receive HSCT, but a subsequent treatment-free status could have been achieved only by HSCT. Furthermore, CD20 positivity may be a useful biomarker for future treatment decisions in patients with Ph+ALL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2000年伊马替尼的推出开启了酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)用于CML治疗的时代,并彻底改变了CML患者的预期寿命。现在很像健康的老年人口。在过去的20年里,TKI治疗本身和目标都经历了演变,在本综述中强调和讨论.在TKI引入后的前10年中,CML治疗的主要目标是消除疾病从慢性期到发育期的进展,并确保绝大多数患者的长期生存。在第二个10年(从2010年到现在),CML治疗的主要目标从生存转移到生存,被认为是一个目标,无治疗缓解(TFR)。出现了两种现象:不超过50-60%的CML患者可能是停药的候选人,其中超过50%的患者分子复发。特定TKI脱靶副作用的增加的累积发生率与迫使在相当大比例的患者中停止或减少TKI施用以及在患者的特定设置中避免特定TKI相关。因此,治疗策略必须适应各类患者.基于最小有效剂量原则的替代策略已经过成功的测试,现在对其进行了重新评估。因为它们保证了生存和更好的生活质量,也是。从治疗疾病转向治疗患者是范式的重要变化。我们可以说我们正在进入个性化的CML治疗,考虑到病人的年龄,他们的合并症,耐受性,和具体的目标。在这种情况下,支持病人监测的新技术,比如数字PCR,必须考虑。在本次审查中,我们深入介绍了这一演变,并对CML治疗的未来前景进行了评论。
    The introduction of imatinib in 2000 opened the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML therapy and has revolutionized the life expectancy of CML patients, which is now quite like the one of the healthy aged population. Over the last 20 years, both the TKI therapy itself and the objectives have undergone evolutions highlighted and discussed in this review. The main objective of the CML therapy in the first 10 years after TKI introduction was to abolish the disease progression from the chronic to the blastic phase and guarantee the long-term survival of the great majority of patients. In the second 10 years (from 2010 to the present), the main objective of CML therapy moved from survival, considered achieved as a goal, to treatment-free remission (TFR). Two phenomena emerged: no more than 50-60% of CML patients could be candidates for discontinuation and over 50% of them molecularly relapse. The increased cumulative incidence of specific TKI off-target side effects was such relevant to compel to discontinue or reduce the TKI administration in a significant proportion of patients and to avoid a specific TKI in particular settings of patients. Therefore, the treatment strategy must be adapted to each category of patients. What about the patients who do not get or fail the TFR? Should they be compelled to continue the TKIs at the maximum tolerated dose? Alternative strategies based on the principle of minimal effective dose have been tested with success and they are now re-evaluated with more attention, since they guarantee survival and probably a better quality of life, too. Moving from treating the disease to treating the patient is an important change of paradigm. We can say that we are entering a personalized CML therapy, which considers the patients\' age, their comorbidities, tolerability, and specific objectives. In this scenario, the new techniques supporting the monitoring of the patients, such as the digital PCR, must be considered. In the present review, we present in deep this evolution and comment on the future perspectives of CML therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    液滴数字聚合酶链反应(ddPCR)是一种精确的测量方法。
    我们进行了这项研究,以确定停止酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的慢性期慢性髓性白血病患者成功无治疗缓解的预后因素。我们还旨在验证ddPCR预测分子复发。
    这是一个前景,多中心研究。
    我们招募了接受TKIs治疗至少3年的患者,并确认了至少1年的持续深层分子反应(DMR)。在经历了主要分子反应(MMR)丧失的患者中重新施用TKI。
    共有66名来自韩国5个机构的患者入组。在16.5个月的中位随访期间,29/66(43.9%)患者出现分子复发;TKI停药后6或12个月分子无复发生存(RFS)的概率为65.6%或57.8%,分别,大多数分子复发发生在前7个月内。所有失去MMR的患者均接受TKI治疗,所有MMR的中位数为2.8个月。在TKI停药(p=0.002)之前,E14a2转录类型(p=0.005)和更长的DMR持续时间(48个月)与延长的分子RFS和持续的DMR相关。同时具有e13a2转录物类型和可检测BCR::ABL1(MR5.0)的患者在TKI停药时通过ddPCR显示分子RFS持续时间较短(p=0.015)。
    我们的数据表明,在决定是否停止TKI治疗时,应考虑ddPCR上的转录物类型和BCR::ABL1转录物水平。
    UNASSIGNED: Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is an exact method of measurement.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted this study to identify the prognostic factors for successful treatment-free remission in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia who discontinued tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We also aimed to validate ddPCR for predicting molecular relapse.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective, multicenter study.
    UNASSIGNED: We enrolled patients treated with TKIs for at least 3 years with a confirmed sustained deep molecular response (DMR) for at least 1 year. TKI was re-administered in patients who experienced the loss of major molecular response (MMR).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 66 patients from five institutions in South Korea were enrolled. During a median follow-up period of 16.5 months, 29/66 (43.9%) patients experienced molecular relapse; the probability of molecular relapse-free survival (RFS) at 6 or 12 months after TKI discontinuation was 65.6% or 57.8%, respectively, with most molecular relapses occurring within the first 7 months. All patients who lost MMR were re-treated with TKI, and all re-achieved MMR at a median of 2.8 months. E14a2 transcript type (p = 0.005) and longer DMR duration (⩾48 months) prior to TKI discontinuation (p = 0.002) were associated with prolonged molecular RFS and with sustained DMR. Patients with both e13a2 transcript type and detectable BCR::ABL1 (⩾MR5.0) by ddPCR at the time of TKI discontinuation showed shorter duration of molecular RFS (p = 0.015).
    UNASSIGNED: Our data suggest that transcript type and BCR::ABL1 transcript levels on ddPCR should be taken into consideration when deciding whether to discontinue TKI therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:无治疗缓解(TFR)已成为慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)的主要目标。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)剂量优化对于管理不良事件至关重要。提高临床实践的依从性。在实现深层分子反应(DMR)的人中,一些数据表明,停药前TKI剂量减少不会改变实现TFR的成功率,但这是有争议的。然而,全剂量TKI的CML患者的生活质量(QoL)和心理健康数据,低剂量TKI,和TKI停药是有限的。此外,最近的证据表明TKI剂量减少和剂量减少后停药的可行性,这可能会改变CML患者对TKI停药的看法。
    方法:我们使用在线问卷进行了一项横断面研究,以探索QoL,不同剂量TKI患者的心理健康,以及将减少TKI剂量作为停药前奏的观点。
    结果:分析中包括1450个响应。44.3%的受访者表示TKI治疗对其QoL有中度至重度影响。17%的受访者有中度至重度焦虑。24.4%的受访者患有中度至重度抑郁症。在1326名没有停药的患者中,1055(79.6%)患者报告说,由于担心长期用药的副作用,他们会尝试停用TKI(67.9%),财政负担(68.7%),QoL差(77.9%),怀孕需求(11.6%),服用TKI时的焦虑和抑郁(20.8%),TKI治疗不便(22.2%)。接受全剂量TKI治疗的817名患者中有613名(75.0%)表示,他们更喜欢在剂量减少后停止TKI治疗之前尝试减少剂量,而31名(3.8%)则更喜欢在停止前不减少剂量。
    结论:TKI剂量减少显示患者QoL和心理健康有显著改善,与TKI停药的效果相当。大多数患者表示,他们倾向于在停止TKI治疗前减少剂量。在临床实践中,TKI剂量减少可以被认为是从全剂量治疗到停药的桥梁。我们的结果表明,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)剂量减少显示患者的生活质量和心理健康的显著改善,与TKI停药的效果相当。大多数患者希望将来停止TKI。与直接停药相比,减少剂量后停用TKI更容易接受。在临床实践中,TKI剂量减少可以被认为是从全剂量治疗到停药的桥梁。请不要犹豫与我联系,如果进一步澄清是需要与此提交。
    Treatment-free remission (TFR) has become the main target for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) dose optimization is crucial in managing adverse events, and improving adherence in clinical practice. In persons achieving a deep molecular response (DMR), some data suggest TKI dose reduction before discontinuation does not change success rate of achieving TFR, but this is controversial. However, data on quality-of-life (QoL) and mental health in CML patients with full-dose TKI, low-dose TKI, and TKI discontinuation are limited. Moreover, recent evidence indicating the feasibility of TKI dose reduction and discontinuation after dose reduction, which may change CML patients\' perspectives on TKI discontinuation.
    We conducted a cross-sectional study using online questionnaires to explore the QoL, mental health in patients with diverse TKI dose, and perspective on TKI dose reduction as a prelude to discontinuation.
    1450 responses were included in the analysis. 44.3% of respondents reported a moderate-to-severe impact of TKI treatment on their QoL. 17% of respondents had moderate-to-severe anxiety. 24.4% of respondents had moderate-to-severe depression. In 1326 patients who had not discontinued their medication, 1055 (79.6%) patients reported they would try TKI discontinuation because of concerns over side effects of long-term medication (67.9%), financial burden (68.7%), poor QoL (77.9%), pregnancy needs (11.6%), anxiety and depression while taking TKI (20.8%), inconvenience of TKI treatment (22.2%). 613 of 817 (75.0%) patients on full-dose TKI therapy indicated they preferred trying a dose reduction before discontinuing TKI therapy after dose reduction compared with 31 (3.8%) preferring no dose reduction before stopping.
    TKI dose reduction showed a significant improvement of patients\' QoL and mental health, comparable to the effect of TKI discontinuation. Most patients indicated they preferred dose reduction before stopping TKI therapy. In clinical practice, TKI dose reduction can be considered as a bridge from full-dose treatment to discontinuation. Our results showed that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) dose reduction showed a significant improvement of patients\' quality-of-life and mental health, comparable to the effect of TKI discontinuation. Most patients desire to discontinue TKI in the future. TKI discontinuation after dose reduction is more acceptable compared to discontinuing it directly. In clinical practice, TKI dose reduction can be considered as a bridge from full-dose treatment to discontinuation. Please do not hesitate to contact me in case further clarification is needed with this submission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期(CML-CP)患者具有持续的深层分子反应(DMR),有资格停止治疗并尝试无治疗缓解(TFR)。在DASFREE研究(ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT01850004)中,达沙替尼停药后2年TFR率为46%;在此我们介绍5年更新.在达沙替尼治疗≥2年后,DMR稳定的患者停止治疗,并随访5年。至少随访60个月,84例停用达沙替尼的患者,5年TFR率为44%(n=37)。39个月后没有复发,所有复发并重新开始达沙替尼的可评估患者(n=46)在中位数1.9个月内恢复了主要分子反应。非治疗期间最常见的不良事件是关节痛(18%,15/84);9例患者(11%)共报告15例戒断事件。在5年的最后一次随访中,在持续DMR后停用达沙替尼的患者中,有近一半维持了TFR.所有经历复发的可评估患者在重新启动达沙替尼后迅速恢复DMR,证明在CML-CP患者中,停药达沙替尼是一种可行且潜在的长期选择.安全性与以前的报告一致。
    Patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) who have a sustained deep molecular response (DMR) are eligible to discontinue treatment and attempt treatment-free remission (TFR). In the DASFREE study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01850004), the 2-year TFR rate after dasatinib discontinuation was 46%; here we present the 5-year update. Patients with a stable DMR after ≥2 years of dasatinib therapy discontinued treatment and were followed for 5 years. At a minimum follow-up of 60 months, in 84 patients discontinuing dasatinib, the 5-year TFR rate was 44% (n = 37). No relapses occurred after month 39 and all evaluable patients who relapsed and restarted dasatinib (n = 46) regained a major molecular response in a median of 1.9 months. The most common adverse event during the off-treatment period was arthralgia (18%, 15/84); a total of 15 withdrawal events were reported in nine patients (11%). At the 5-year final follow-up, almost half of the patients who discontinued dasatinib after a sustained DMR maintained TFR. All evaluable patients who experienced a relapse quickly regained a DMR after restarting dasatinib, demonstrating that dasatinib discontinuation is a viable and potentially long-term option in patients with CML-CP. The safety profile is consistent with the previous report.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,慢性髓性白血病(CML)的治疗方法发生了变化。因此,目前,处于慢性期的患者中有很高的比例几乎具有平均预期寿命。治疗还旨在实现稳定的深层分子反应(DMR),这可能允许剂量减少或甚至停止治疗。这些策略通常用于真实的实践,以减少不良事件,然而,它们对免治疗缓解(TFR)的影响仍存在争议.在一些研究中,据观察,多达一半的患者在停止TKI治疗后可达到TFR.如果TFR更广泛且在全球范围内可实现,对毒性的看法可以改变。我们回顾性分析了2002年至2022年间在三级医院接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的80例CML患者。从他们那里,71例患者接受低剂量TKI治疗,25个最终停产,其中9个在没有先前剂量减少的情况下被停用。关于低剂量治疗的患者,其中只有11例出现分子复发(15.4%),平均分子无复发生存期(MRFS)为24.6个月。MRFS结果不受任何检查变量的影响,包括性别,索卡尔风险评分,之前用干扰素或羟基脲治疗,CML诊断时的年龄,低剂量治疗的开始和TKI治疗的平均持续时间。TKI停药后,除四名患者外,所有患者均保持MMR,中位随访时间为29.2个月。在我们的研究中,TFR估计为38.9个月(95%CI4.1-73.9)。这项研究表明,低剂量治疗和/或TKI停药是一个显著的,对于可能遭受不良事件(AE)的患者,应考虑安全的替代方案,这阻碍了TKI的依从性和/或降低了他们的生活质量。连同已出版的文献,研究表明,减少CML慢性期患者的剂量似乎是安全的.一旦达到DMR,就停止TKI治疗是这些患者的目标之一。应该对患者进行全球评估,并应考虑最合适的管理策略。未来的研究需要确保这种方法被纳入临床实践,因为对某些患者的好处和提高医疗系统的效率。
    The therapeutic approach to chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has changed in recent years. As a result, a high percentage of current patients in the chronic phase of the disease almost have an average life expectancy. Treatment also aims to achieve a stable deep molecular response (DMR) that might allow dose reduction or even treatment discontinuation. These strategies are often used in authentic practices to reduce adverse events, yet their impact on treatment-free remission (TFR) is a controversial debate. In some studies, it has been observed that as many as half of patients can achieve TFR after the discontinuation of TKI treatment. If TFR was more widespread and globally achievable, the perspective on toxicity could be changed. We retrospectively analysed 80 CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) at a tertiary hospital between 2002 and 2022. From them, 71 patients were treated with low doses of TKI, and 25 were eventually discontinued, 9 of them being discontinued without a previous dose reduction. Regarding patients treated with low doses, only 11 of them had molecular recurrence (15.4%), and the average molecular recurrence free survival (MRFS) was 24.6 months. The MRFS outcome was not affected by any of the variables examined, including gender, Sokal risk scores, prior treatment with interferon or hydroxycarbamide, age at the time of CML diagnosis, the initiation of low-dose therapy and the mean duration of TKI therapy. After TKI discontinuation, all but four patients maintained MMR, with a median follow-up of 29.2 months. In our study, TFR was estimated at 38.9 months (95% CI 4.1-73.9). This study indicates that low-dose treatment and/or TKI discontinuation is a salient, safe alternative to be considered for patients who may suffer adverse events (AEs), which hinder the adherence of TKI and/or deteriorate their life quality. Together with the published literature, it shows that it appears safe to administer reduced doses to patients with CML in the chronic phase. The discontinuation of TKI therapy once a DMR has been reached is one of the goals for these patients. The patient should be assessed globally, and the most appropriate strategy for management should be considered. Future studies are needed to ensure that this approach is included in clinical practice because of the benefits for certain patients and the increased efficiency for the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的出现,慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)的治疗前景发生了明显变化。这种创新可以延长患有CML的患者的长期生存。然而,长期暴露于TKIs会伴随各种不良事件(AE).后者影响CML患者的生活质量和依从性,并可能导致严重的疾病进展(甚至死亡)。最近,越来越多的CML患者开始采用剂量优化策略.可以在整个治疗的所有阶段考虑剂量优化,其中包括剂量减少和停止TKIs治疗。总的来说,在维持分子反应的前提下,降低TKI剂量被认为是降低AE和提高生活质量的重要措施。此外,对于约一半具有稳定的最佳反应和更长的TKI治疗持续时间的患者,停用TKIs治疗是可行和安全的.本文主要对伊马替尼剂量优化的最新研究进行综述,达沙替尼,和尼洛替尼在CML临床试验和现实生活中的应用。我们考虑减少新诊断患者的剂量,或者在最佳反应中,或改善AE,作为无治疗缓解(TFR)的前奏,或作为那些无法停止TKIs治疗的患者的维持治疗。此外,我们还将重点放在停止TKIs治疗和实现TFR的第二次尝试上.
    With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment prospects of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have changed markedly. This innovation can lengthen the long-term survival of patients suffering from CML. However, long-term exposure to TKIs is accompanied by various adverse events (AEs). The latter affect the quality of life and compliance of patients with CML, and may lead to serious disease progression (and even death). Recently, increasing numbers of patients with CML have begun to pursue a dose optimization strategy. Dose optimization may be considered at all stages of the entire treatment, which includes dose reduction and discontinuation of TKIs therapy. In general, reduction of the TKI dose is considered to be an important measure to reduce AEs and improve quality of life on the premise of maintaining molecular responses. Furthermore, discontinuation of TKIs therapy has been demonstrated to be feasible and safe for about half of patients with a stable optimal response and a longer duration of TKI treatment. This review focuses mainly on the latest research of dose optimization of imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib in CML clinical trials and real-life settings. We consider dose reduction in newly diagnosed patients, or in optimal response, or for improving AEs, either as a prelude to treatment-free remission (TFR) or as maintenance therapy in those patients unable to discontinue TKIs therapy. In addition, we also focus on discontinuation of TKIs therapy and second attempts to achieve TFR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号