treatment-free remission

免治疗缓解
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)与强化化疗的组合改善了费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病(Ph+ALL)的总生存期(OS)。近年来,在没有异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)或维持治疗的情况下,人们对长期存活的可能性越来越感兴趣.本研究的目的是使用真实世界数据确定Ph+ALL患者的治疗效果和结果。方法我们利用秋田大学医院的数据进行了单中心回顾性分析(秋田,日本)从2000年11月至2023年6月评估TKI联合强化化疗治疗Ph+ALL的结果。结果23例Ph+ALL患者采用强化化疗联合TKI治疗,包括六个伊马替尼,四个达沙替尼,和13普纳替尼。患者年龄中位数为53岁(范围;28-67)。18名患者(78%)在三个月内实现了完全分子缓解(CMR)。16例患者(70%)进行了HSCT,所有患者均未接受移植后TKI维持治疗.7例未接受HSCT的患者中有6例在强化化疗后接受了ponatinib维持治疗。三年OS为81%。Ponatinib治疗的OS率远高于伊马替尼/达沙替尼(100%vs.60%;P=0.011)。三个月内的CMR被确定为分子无复发生存的预后因素(风险比(HR)=0.22;P=0.027)。CD20阳性被确定为血液学复发的危险因素(HR=5.2,P=0.032)。结论即使在单中心队列研究中,普纳替尼,作为TKI与强化化疗或维持治疗的组合,可能改善Ph+ALL的预后。三个月内患有CMR的患者可能不一定需要接受HSCT,但只有通过HSCT才能实现随后的无治疗状态.此外,CD20阳性可能是Ph+ALL患者未来治疗决策的有用生物标志物。
    Introduction The overall survival (OS) of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) has improved with the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with intensive chemotherapy. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the possibility of long-term survival without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or maintenance therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of treatment and the resultant outcomes in Ph+ALL patients using real-world data. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective analysis utilizing Akita University Hospital data (Akita, Japan) from November 2000 to June 2023 to evaluate the outcomes of TKI with intensive chemotherapy for Ph+ALL. Results Twenty-three patients with Ph+ALL were treated with intensive chemotherapy combined with TKI, including six imatinib, four dasatinib, and 13 ponatinib. The median patient age was 53 years (range; 28-67). Eighteen patients (78%) achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) within three months. HSCT was performed in 16 patients (70%), all of whom did not receive post-transplant TKI maintenance therapy. Six of the seven patients who did not undergo HSCT received maintenance therapy with ponatinib after intensive chemotherapy. The three-year OS was 81%. Ponatinib treatment resulted in a much higher OS rate than imatinib/dasatinib (100% vs. 60%; P=0.011). CMR within three months was identified as a prognostic factor for molecular relapse-free survival (hazard ratio (HR)=0.22; P=0.027). CD20 positivity was identified as a risk factor for hematological relapse (HR=5.2, P=0.032). Conclusion Even in a single-center cohort study, ponatinib, as a combination TKI with intensive chemotherapy or maintenance therapy, may improve the prognosis of Ph+ALL. Patients with CMR within three months might not necessarily need to receive HSCT, but a subsequent treatment-free status could have been achieved only by HSCT. Furthermore, CD20 positivity may be a useful biomarker for future treatment decisions in patients with Ph+ALL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA)刺激血小板生成,这可能会恢复原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的免疫耐受。iROM研究调查了romiplostim的免疫调节作用。13名患者(中位年龄,31岁)先前接受一线治疗的人接受romiplostim治疗22周,随后监测至第52周。除了免疫学数据,次要终点包括1年时持续缓解脱离治疗(SROT)率,romiplostim剂量,血小板计数和出血。在6例新诊断的ITP患者中实现了romiplostim和SROT的计划停药,而其余7例患者复发。与复发患者相比,SROT患者的Romiplostim剂量滴定较低,血小板计数反应更强。在所有患者中,调节性T淋巴细胞(Treg)计数增加直至研究完成,SROT患者的计数更高.白细胞介素(IL)-4,IL-9和IL-17F水平在所有患者中均显着降低。FOXP3(Treg),SROT患者GATA3(Th2)mRNA表达和转化生长因子-β水平升高。romiplostim治疗调节免疫系统并可能影响ITP预后。血小板计数的快速增加对于诱导免疫耐受可能是重要的。在自身免疫的早期阶段可能会取得更好的结果,但需要临床研究来确认。
    Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) stimulate platelet production, which might restore immunological tolerance in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The iROM study investigated romiplostim\'s immunomodulatory effects. Thirteen patients (median age, 31 years) who previously received first-line treatment received romiplostim for 22 weeks, followed by monitoring until week 52. In addition to immunological data, secondary end-points included the sustained remission off-treatment (SROT) rate at 1 year, romiplostim dose, platelet count and bleedings. Scheduled discontinuation of romiplostim and SROT were achieved in six patients with newly diagnosed ITP, whereas the remaining seven patients relapsed. Romiplostim dose titration was lower and platelet count response was stronger in patients with SROT than in relapsed patients. In all patients, regulatory T lymphocyte (Treg) counts increased until study completion and the counts were higher in patients with SROT. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-9 and IL-17F levels decreased significantly in all patients. FOXP3 (Treg), GATA3 (Th2) mRNA expression and transforming growth factor-β levels increased in patients with SROT. Treatment with romiplostim modulates the immune system and possibly influences ITP prognosis. A rapid increase in platelet counts is likely important for inducing immune tolerance. Better outcomes might be achieved at an early stage of autoimmunity, but clinical studies are needed for confirmation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多项研究报道,在停止酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者中,无治疗缓解(TFR)率为50%-60%。然而,其余一半患者仍需要重新开始TKI治疗以控制白血病.对于首次TFR(TFR1)尝试失败的患者,是否应转换TKI药物进行重新治疗尚不清楚。我们的研究试图确定伊马替尼停药后TFR1失败后的达沙替尼治疗是否可以改善TFR2的可能性。在伊马替尼停用TFR1后失去分子反应的59例患者中,55例患者(93.2%)接受了达沙替尼治疗,其中49人(89.1%)恢复了MR4.5或更深层次的反应,达到MR4.5的中位时间为1.85个月。35例患者因TFR2尝试而停用达沙替尼,其中26例(74.28%)MMR和6例(17.14%)MR4丢失。Dasatinib停药后TFR2的危险因素分析表明有三个重要因素:(1)TFR1尝试后BCR::ABL1转录本的倍增时间,(2)达沙替尼治疗后分子反应的快速恢复和(3)在TFR2尝试之前无法检测到BCR::ABL1转录物。本研究表明,达沙替尼一般不会增加TFR2率,但是选定的一组患者可以从这种方法中受益。
    Multiple studies have reported a significant treatment-free remission (TFR) rate of 50%-60% in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. However, the remaining half of these patients still require re-initiation of TKI therapy for leukaemia control. It remains unclear if TKI drugs should be switched for re-therapy in patients who failed the first TFR (TFR1) attempt. Our study attempted to determine whether dasatinib therapy after TFR1 failure post-imatinib discontinuation could improve the likelihood of TFR2. Of 59 patients who lost molecular response after imatinib discontinuation for TFR1, 55 patients (93.2%) were treated with dasatinib, of whom 49 (89.1%) regained MR4.5 or deeper response, with a median time of 1.85 months to achieve MR4.5. Dasatinib was discontinued in 35 patients for TFR2 attempt, of whom 26 patients (74.28%) lost MMR and 6 (17.14%) MR4. Risk factor analysis for the TFR2 after dasatinib discontinuation suggested three significant factors: (1) doubling time of BCR::ABL1 transcript following TFR1 attempt, (2) rapid regaining of molecular response following dasatinib therapy and (3) undetectable BCR::ABL1 transcript prior to TFR2 attempt. The present study showed that dasatinib does not increase the TFR2 rate in general, but a selected group of patients could benefit from this approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,慢性髓性白血病(CML)的治疗方法发生了变化。因此,目前,处于慢性期的患者中有很高的比例几乎具有平均预期寿命。治疗还旨在实现稳定的深层分子反应(DMR),这可能允许剂量减少或甚至停止治疗。这些策略通常用于真实的实践,以减少不良事件,然而,它们对免治疗缓解(TFR)的影响仍存在争议.在一些研究中,据观察,多达一半的患者在停止TKI治疗后可达到TFR.如果TFR更广泛且在全球范围内可实现,对毒性的看法可以改变。我们回顾性分析了2002年至2022年间在三级医院接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的80例CML患者。从他们那里,71例患者接受低剂量TKI治疗,25个最终停产,其中9个在没有先前剂量减少的情况下被停用。关于低剂量治疗的患者,其中只有11例出现分子复发(15.4%),平均分子无复发生存期(MRFS)为24.6个月。MRFS结果不受任何检查变量的影响,包括性别,索卡尔风险评分,之前用干扰素或羟基脲治疗,CML诊断时的年龄,低剂量治疗的开始和TKI治疗的平均持续时间。TKI停药后,除四名患者外,所有患者均保持MMR,中位随访时间为29.2个月。在我们的研究中,TFR估计为38.9个月(95%CI4.1-73.9)。这项研究表明,低剂量治疗和/或TKI停药是一个显著的,对于可能遭受不良事件(AE)的患者,应考虑安全的替代方案,这阻碍了TKI的依从性和/或降低了他们的生活质量。连同已出版的文献,研究表明,减少CML慢性期患者的剂量似乎是安全的.一旦达到DMR,就停止TKI治疗是这些患者的目标之一。应该对患者进行全球评估,并应考虑最合适的管理策略。未来的研究需要确保这种方法被纳入临床实践,因为对某些患者的好处和提高医疗系统的效率。
    The therapeutic approach to chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has changed in recent years. As a result, a high percentage of current patients in the chronic phase of the disease almost have an average life expectancy. Treatment also aims to achieve a stable deep molecular response (DMR) that might allow dose reduction or even treatment discontinuation. These strategies are often used in authentic practices to reduce adverse events, yet their impact on treatment-free remission (TFR) is a controversial debate. In some studies, it has been observed that as many as half of patients can achieve TFR after the discontinuation of TKI treatment. If TFR was more widespread and globally achievable, the perspective on toxicity could be changed. We retrospectively analysed 80 CML patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) at a tertiary hospital between 2002 and 2022. From them, 71 patients were treated with low doses of TKI, and 25 were eventually discontinued, 9 of them being discontinued without a previous dose reduction. Regarding patients treated with low doses, only 11 of them had molecular recurrence (15.4%), and the average molecular recurrence free survival (MRFS) was 24.6 months. The MRFS outcome was not affected by any of the variables examined, including gender, Sokal risk scores, prior treatment with interferon or hydroxycarbamide, age at the time of CML diagnosis, the initiation of low-dose therapy and the mean duration of TKI therapy. After TKI discontinuation, all but four patients maintained MMR, with a median follow-up of 29.2 months. In our study, TFR was estimated at 38.9 months (95% CI 4.1-73.9). This study indicates that low-dose treatment and/or TKI discontinuation is a salient, safe alternative to be considered for patients who may suffer adverse events (AEs), which hinder the adherence of TKI and/or deteriorate their life quality. Together with the published literature, it shows that it appears safe to administer reduced doses to patients with CML in the chronic phase. The discontinuation of TKI therapy once a DMR has been reached is one of the goals for these patients. The patient should be assessed globally, and the most appropriate strategy for management should be considered. Future studies are needed to ensure that this approach is included in clinical practice because of the benefits for certain patients and the increased efficiency for the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创新者和仿制药伊马替尼都被批准用于治疗慢性髓性白血病慢性期(CML-CP)。目前,目前还没有关于伊马替尼无治疗缓解(TFR)可行性的研究.本研究试图确定TFR在仿制药伊马替尼患者中的可行性和有效性。
    在这项单中心前瞻性无伊马替尼CML-CP试验研究中,纳入了26例接受普用伊马替尼治疗≥3年和持续深层分子反应(两年以上BCRABLIS≤0.01%)的患者.治疗停止后,患者接受全血细胞计数和BCRABLIS实时定量PCR监测,为期1年,之后为3个月.在单一记录的主要分子反应损失(BCRABLIS>0.1%)时重新开始通用伊马替尼。
    中位随访时间为33个月(四分位距18.7-35),42.3%的患者(n=11)继续处于TFR中。一年的TFR估计为44%。所有患者重新开始使用通用伊马替尼,恢复了主要分子反应。在多变量分析中,在TFR之前达到分子检测不到的白血病(>MR5)可以预测TFR[P=0.022,HR0.284(0.096-0.837)].
    该研究增加了越来越多的文献,即在深度分子缓解的CML-CP患者中,通用伊马替尼是有效的,并且可以安全地停用。
    Both innovator and generic imatinib are approved for the treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia-Chronic phase (CML-CP). Currently, there are no studies on the feasibility of treatment-free remission (TFR) with generic imatinib. This study attempted to determine the feasibility and efficacy of TFR in patients on generic Imatinib.
    In this single-centre prospective Generic Imatinib-Free Trial-in-CML-CP study, twenty six patients on generic imatinib for ≥3 yr and in sustained deep molecular response (BCR ABLIS ≤0.01% for more than two years) were included. After treatment discontinuation, patients were monitored with complete blood count and BCR ABLIS by real-time quantitative PCR monthly for one year and three monthly thereafter. Generic imatinib was restarted at single documented loss of major molecular response (BCR ABLIS>0.1%).
    At a median follow up of 33 months (interquartile range 18.7-35), 42.3 per cent patients (n=11) continued to be in TFR. Estimated TFR at one year was 44 per cent. All patients restarted on generic imatinib regained major molecular response. On multivariate analysis, attainment of molecularly undetectable leukaemia (>MR5) prior to TFR was predictive of TFR [P=0.022, HR 0.284 (0.096-0.837)].
    The study adds to the growing literature that generic imatinib is effective and can be safely discontinued in CML-CP patients who are in deep molecular remission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CML中TKI的长期治疗可能导致持续的不良事件(AE),可促进相关的发病率和死亡率。因此,TKI剂量减少通常用于预防AE。然而,关于其对成功的无治疗缓解(TFR)的影响的数据相当缺乏.我们对参与校园CML网络的54个意大利血液学中心停用低剂量TKIs的CML受试者的结果进行了回顾性研究。总的来说,1.785(35.0%)定期随访CML患者接受低剂量TKIs治疗,更常见的原因是相关的合并症或不良事件(1.288,72.2%)。在248名(13.9%)受试者中尝试TFR,在深分子反应(DMR)中,除了三个。在中位随访24.9个月后,172例(69.4%)患者仍处于TFR。TFR结果不受性别影响,索卡尔/ELTS风险评分,先前的干扰素,停止治疗前使用的TKI的数量和最后一种类型,DMR度,剂量减少或中位TKIs持续时间的原因。相反,在对任何先前的TKI没有抗性的情况下,TFR概率显著更好。此外,在TKI停药前DMR持续时间较长的患者(即,>6.8年)和具有e14a2BCR::ABL1转录本类型的人显示出TFR延长的趋势。还应该强调的是,只有30.6%的病例患有分子复发,低于全剂量TKI治疗期间的报告。使用低剂量TKIs似乎不会影响实现DMR并因此尝试退出治疗的可能性,但甚至可能会提高TFR率。
    TKIs long-term treatment in CML may lead to persistent adverse events (AEs) that can promote relevant morbidity and mortality. Consequently, TKIs dose reduction is often used to prevent AEs. However, data on its impact on successful treatment-free remission (TFR) are quite scarce. We conducted a retrospective study on the outcome of CML subjects who discontinued low-dose TKIs from 54 Italian hematology centers participating in the Campus CML network. Overall, 1.785 of 5.108 (35.0%) regularly followed CML patients were treated with low-dose TKIs, more frequently due to relevant comorbidities or AEs (1.288, 72.2%). TFR was attempted in 248 (13.9%) subjects, all but three while in deep molecular response (DMR). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months, 172 (69.4%) patients were still in TFR. TFR outcome was not influenced by gender, Sokal/ELTS risk scores, prior interferon, number and last type of TKI used prior to treatment cessation, DMR degree, reason for dose reduction or median TKIs duration. Conversely, TFR probability was significantly better in the absence of resistance to any prior TKI. In addition, patients with a longer DMR duration before TKI discontinuation (i.e., >6.8 years) and those with an e14a2 BCR::ABL1 transcript type showed a trend towards prolonged TFR. It should also be emphasized that only 30.6% of our cases suffered from molecular relapse, less than reported during full-dose TKI treatment. The use of low-dose TKIs does not appear to affect the likelihood of achieving a DMR and thus trying a treatment withdrawal, but might even promote the TFR rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    无治疗缓解(TFR)是慢性粒细胞白血病慢性期(CML-CP)患者对酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)治疗具有持续的深层分子反应(DMR)的新目标。然而,在使用第二代(2G)-TKIs治疗的患者中成功进行TFR的最佳条件尚未完全确定.在这项D-FREE研究中,在接受2G-TKI达沙替尼治疗的新诊断CML-CP患者中,BCR-ABL1水平在国际范围内(BCR-ABL1IS)达到≤0.0032%(MR4.5),并将这些水平维持正好1年,我们尝试停止治疗.在接受达沙替尼诱导治疗长达2年的173例患者中,123人完成,60人(48.8%)达到4.5MR。在维持MR4.51年并停用达沙替尼的前21例患者中,17例经历了分子复发,定义为主要分子反应丧失(BCR-ABL1IS>0.1%),或MR4丢失(BCR-ABL1IS>0.01%)在2个连续评估中确认。12个月时估计的分子无复发生存率为16.7%。本研究根据方案的安全监测标准提前终止。结论是,在接受达沙替尼治疗少于3年的CML-CP患者中,仅1年的持续DMR不足以治疗TFR。
    Treatment-free remission (TFR) is a new goal for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) with a sustained deep molecular response (DMR) to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, optimal conditions for successful TFR in patients treated with second-generation (2G)-TKIs are not fully defined. In this D-FREE study, treatment discontinuation was attempted in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients treated with the 2G-TKI dasatinib who achieved BCR-ABL1 levels of ≤ 0.0032% (MR4.5) on the international scale (BCR-ABL1IS) and maintained these levels for exactly 1 year. Of the 173 patients who received dasatinib induction therapy for up to 2 years, 123 completed and 60 (48.8%) reached MR 4.5. Among the first 21 patients who maintained MR4.5 for 1 year and discontinued dasatinib, 17 experienced molecular relapse defined as loss of major molecular response (BCR-ABL1IS > 0.1%) confirmed once, or loss of MR4 (BCR-ABL1IS > 0.01%) confirmed on 2 consecutive assessments. The estimated molecular relapse-free survival rate was 16.7% at 12 months. This study was prematurely terminated according to the protocol\'s safety monitoring criteria. The conclusion was that sustained DMR for just 1 year is insufficient for TFR in CML-CP patients receiving dasatinib for less than a total of 3 years of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    Although total duration of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and of molecular response at 4 log reduction or deeper (MR4) correlates with treatment-free remission (TFR) success after TKI discontinuation, the optimal cut-off values of the duration remain unresolved. Thus, 131 patients were enrolled into the Canadian TKI discontinuation study. The molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) was defined from imatinib discontinuation till molecular recurrence, that is, major molecular response (MMR) loss and/or MR4 loss. We evaluated mRFS at 12 months after imatinib discontinuation, analyzed it according to the imatinib treatment duration and MR4 duration, and calculated P value, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) in the yearly cut-off period of time. The shortest cut-off was sought that met the joint criteria of a P value ≤ 0·05, PPV ≥ 60% and NPV ≥ 60%. We propose six years as the shortest imatinib duration cut-off with a P value 0·01, PPV 68% and NPV 62%: The patients treated with imatinib duration ≥ 6 years showed a superior mRFS rate (61·8%) compared to those with less treatment (36·0%). Also, 4·5 years MR4 duration as the shortest cut-off with a P value 0·003, PPV 63% and NPV 61%: those with MR4 duration ≥ 4·5 years showed a higher mRFS rate (64·2%) than those with a shorter MR4 duration (41·9%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Long-term treatment-free remission (TFR) represents a new goal for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In clinical practice, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) dose reductions can be considered a means of preventing adverse effects and improving quality of life. We hypothesized that administration of low-dose TKIs before treatment discontinuation does not impair TFR in patients with CML who have a deep molecular response (DMR, ≥MR4 ).
    We conducted a retrospective analysis of 77 patients with CML who discontinued treatment with TKIs. Twenty-six patients had been managed with low-dose TKIs before stopping treatment. Patients were to be exposed to TKIs for ≥5 years and to low-dose TKIs for ≥1 year and in DMR for ≥2 years. The loss of major molecular response (MMR) was considered a trigger for restarting therapy.
    In the low-dose group, 61.5% of patients received second-generation TKIs, and dose reduction was ≥50% for 65.4% of patients. With a median follow-up of 61.5 months, TFR at 12 months was 56.8% in the full-dose TKI group and 80.8% in the low-dose group, and TFR at 60 months was 47.5% and 58.8%, respectively. The median time to molecular recurrence (≥MMR) from TKI discontinuation in the entire cohort was 6.2 months. All patients quickly achieved MMR after resuming TKI therapy. Results appear independent of both dose reduction and potential pretreatment with interferon-α.
    This retrospective study shows that TFR was not impaired by low-dose TKI regimens before TKI cessation in Patients with CML. Nevertheless, prospective randomized clinical trials must be undertaken to analyze the probability of successful TFR in patients managed with TKI dose de-escalation strategies before TKI discontinuation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号