BACKGROUND: As children with childhood hypospadias repairs transition into adolescence, the function and appearance of the genitalia acquire greater importance. For some, the direction and shape of the urinary stream can be embarrassing if abnormal, and the appearance of the glans penis and meatus are a concern as they develop the capacity for self-awareness.
OBJECTIVE: Herein, we address the surgical correction and outcomes of urine spraying with or without fistulae, and cosmesis over 12 years. We also analyze if any specific prior repairs were more related to their complaints i.e. cosmesis, spraying, and/or fistulae.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed hypospadias revisions by a single surgeon over 12 years. We included adolescents and young adults who complained of abnormal urinary stream and/or aesthetic complaints. Patients then evaluated the post op result as very good, good, acceptable, or unsatisfactory.
RESULTS: Of 542 patients who underwent revisionary procedures, 90 (16.6%) presented with complaints of urinary spraying, and appearance of the glans penis and/or meatus (see figure). Of these, 19 (21.1%) presented with aesthetic complaints alone, 37 (41.1%) presented with aesthetic complaints and spraying, and 34 (37.7%) presented with aesthetic concerns, spraying, and were noted to have urethral fistula either during preoperative examination or during surgery. 3/90 patients (3.3%) developed wound infection and dehiscence (one had a tubularized incised plate repair, another a Thiersch-Duplay repair, and the primary repair of the third patient was unknown).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and young adults who underwent hypospadias repair during childhood can return with concerns regarding functional and aesthetic abnormalities of the glans penis. Glans sculpting and meatal contouring may be utilized to normalize the urinary stream and achieve a normal aesthetic appearance of the glans penis. Surgeons should follow these patients through adolescence and into adulthood, because complications from hypospadias repairs acquire greater significance later and young adults seek to normalize their phalluses.

暂无摘要。

As the advances in medicine continue to emerge, more children with congenital or pediatric-onset chronic urologic conditions are surviving well into adulthood. This imposes an ever rising there is a need for adequate transition of these patients from pediatric to adult care. Despite position statements from multiple heath care organizations and several models proposed in literature, different issues and gaps in urologic transition continue to exist. Major barriers in this transition are adolescence, a challenging time that is characterized by impulsive behavior and risk taking, and the longstanding relation between both patients and paediatric providers. Both pediatric and adult care providers need to be aware of the special needs of maturing youth with chronic care problems related to education, self-management, legal issues and psychological support during care transition. Furthermore, they need to understand and address the currently existing obstacles for adequate transition. There is need for active communication with each other and the patient to develop sustainable relationships that can support the transitioning process. It is therefore in the greatest interest of the care provider to make this transition as smooth as possible. This paper aims to point out the currently perceived barriers in care transition within the urological context, reflect on previous implemented models for care transition and present proposals for improvement.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, UCSF established a formal Transitional Urology (TU) clinic co-run by pediatric and adult urology aimed at providing comprehensive urologic care for people progressing into adulthood with complex urologic histories.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe baseline demographic and disease characteristics of this population, understand gaps in care, and gauge follow-through.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all new patients in the TU clinic at UCSF from February 2017 through January 2019. After approval from an institutional review board, demographic and clinical data were collected from medical records.
RESULTS: 39 new patients were seen in UCSF\'s TU clinic during a 23-month period. Our cohort included 20 patients with spina bifida and neurogenic bladder, 5 with bladder exstrophy, 3 with disorders of sexual development (DSD), 5 with obstructive uropathy, 2 with cloacal anomalies, and 1 patient each with calcinuria, reflux nephropathy, prune belly syndrome, and urachal cyst. Mean age of patients was 26 years, 63% were male, 88% spoke English, and 70% had public insurance. Patients lived an average of 94 miles from the clinic and had a mean zipcode-based household income of $70,110. There was an average of 19 months between the initial TU visit and the most recent prior urology visit. The median time since last creatinine as well as last renal ultrasound was 9 months. 19 (54%) patients warranted a total of 28 referrals to other providers at their initial visit, and 42% of these were obtained within 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our demographic data, TU patients are likely to have public insurance, live far from the TU clinic, and come from low SES backgrounds. At initial presentation over half of patients warranted updated tests like creatinine and renal ultrasound. Furthermore, nearly two-thirds of patients required at least one referral to a different provider, suggesting a majority of these patients had unmet medical needs at the time of presentation to the TU clinic.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that new patients to the TU clinic often warrant additional workup, updated testing, and referrals to sub-specialty care as these needs are often unmet at the time of presentation. The etiology of this is unclear and it may be due to insurance difficulties, inability to identify an appropriate adult subspecialty provider or access to care issues. Further investigation into barriers to implementation of transitional care is needed to provide comprehensive management to this challenging patient population.

The field of transitional urology has taken on an increasing importance in recent years as more individuals with congenital urologic issues are living and thriving into adulthood. This article reviews the transitional process itself including barriers to successful transition and the consequences of failing to properly transition. Also provided is a broad overview of the urologic issues faced by patients who may benefit from lifelong care and the providers who will be helping them with transition and assuming their care.

A majority of the transitional urology patient population have neurogenic bladder and many of these patients have undergone creation of continent catheterizable channels (CCCs) to facilitate bladder emptying. Transitional urologists will be faced with revision of these channels due to a variety of possible complications. We performed a comprehensive literature review to the data regarding the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors that lead to complications of CCCs as well as surgical revision techniques and their outcomes. Long-term channel complications and related revisions are common (25-30%) and likely underestimated. While many predictors for revision have been posited, the only predictor that has been significant in robust multivariable analysis is channel type, with appendicovesicostomies having a lower chance of requiring revision compared to Monti channels. Channels created in adults have high likelihood of requiring revision, even within a relatively short follow-up period. We review techniques for management of channel complications and their outcomes. As patients with congenital urologic conditions requiring CCCs are gaining longer lifespans, transitional urologists will be faced with revision and/or replacement of these channels. While some of these patients may require supravesical diversion in the future, data show that revision is feasible with good outcomes. Longer-term follow-up data is needed to understand the life-span and best practices of new CCCs created among the transitional population.

The present review provides clinical insights and makes recommendations regarding patient management garnered by the long-term follow up of patients undergoing enteric bladder augmentation for the management of congenital anomalies. A prospectively maintained database on 385 patients that have experienced an enteric bladder augmentation, using either the ileum or colon, was reviewed. Evaluations included methods used to prevent bladder calculi formation and recurrence, the incidence and etiology of renal calculi development, the incidence and treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency, and the complications and need for surgical revisions for continent catheterizable stomas. A significantly increased risk for continent catheterizable stomal complications occurred after Monti-Yang tube formation, 70% (21/30 patients), compared with appendicovesicostomy, 41% (27/66 patients), P = 0.008. Both procedures had significantly more complications than continent catheterizable stomas using tapered ileum with a reinforced ileal-cecal valve, 21% (13/63 patients), P < 0.0001 and P < 0.013, respectively. Approximately 50% of the patient population developed a body mass index ≥30 during adulthood. The onset of obesity resulted in significantly more complications developing in patients with a Monti-Yang tube (87%; 13/15 patients) or appendicovesicostomy (55%; 18/33 patients) compared with a tapered ileum with a reinforced ileal-cecal valve (27%, 8/30 patients), P < 0.00015 and P < 0.025, respectively, with a median follow-up interval of 16 years, range 10-25 years. Long-term follow-up evaluations on patients undergoing an enteric bladder augmentation are necessary to prevent the long-term sequela of this procedure. The key to improving patient prognosis is the nutritional management of the patient as they mature, especially if a continent abdominal stoma is going to be carried out.

Surgery for patients with neurogenic urinary tract dysfunction (nLUTD) is indicated when medical therapy fails, to correct conditions affecting patient safety, or when surgery can enhance the quality of life better than nonoperative management. Examples include failure of maximal medical therapy, inability to perform or aversion to clean intermittent catheterization, refractory incontinence, and complications from chronic, indwelling catheters. Adults with nLUTD have competing risk factors, including previous operations, obesity, poor nutritional status, complex living arrangements, impaired dexterity/paralysis, and impaired executive and cognitive function. Complications are common in this subgroup of patients requiring enduring commitments from surgeons, patients, and their caretakers.

BACKGROUND: Rates of successful transition from adolescent to adult spina bifida (SB) care are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess rates and predictors of successful transition from a multidisciplinary SB clinic to a transitional urology clinic (TUC), or a pediatric or adult urologist.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients discharged from a multidisciplinary SB clinic (2006-2012), collecting demographic and clinical data. At transition, all patients/families were given instructions to arrange an appointment within 12 months. Patients who followed-up within 2 years were classified as transitioned. Logistic regression was used for analysis.
RESULTS: Of 77 patients discharged at a mean age of 19.1 years, 31 (40.3%) successfully transitioned (mean follow-up 4.7 years). Only 20/41 (48.8%) with prior bladder augmentation, urinary channel, and MACE transitioned. There was no significant change in patients transitioning over time or late catch-up presentations (p = 0.41 see Figure). Transitioned and non-transitioned groups were similar in age, gender, home-to-clinic distance, insurance, ambulation, shunt status, prior non-adherence, emergency room visits, neurosurgery appointments, hospitalizations, and surgeries (including genitourinary reconstruction) before discharge (p = 0.22). Transitioned patients had more pre-discharge appointments with services outside the SB clinic (p = 0.01) and radiographic studies (p < 0.001), but these were not significant on multivariate analysis (p = 0.16). Among those who did not transition, five (6.5%) presented after 2 years, rarely with new complaints (20.0%). Patients without urological follow-up were most likely to visit the emergency room (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate continued care and a smooth transition, the TUC was opened across the corridor from the multidisciplinary SB clinic. To our surprise, a low percentage of patients actually transitioned to adult care over the last 7 years. It is a sobering fact that despite offering three different transition models, <50% of patients took advantage of any of them. While none of the predictors we anticipated to be important in a successful transition were statistically significant, potentially because of low statistical power, perhaps others, such as insufficient time to coordinate care, wait times, and lack of adult coordinated care programs, may be more important. We were unable to compare the urologic health of those who did and did not transition, as we relied on medical record data.
CONCLUSIONS: Only 40% of patients transitioned successfully from a multidisciplinary SB clinic and few presented after 2 years. Patients who transitioned tended to have more active health issues and more radiographic tests prior to discharge. Those followed by a urologist are less likely to use emergency room services.

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in transitional urology, or how to best prepare patients with major congenital urologic diseases, such as bladder exstrophy and neuropathic bladder, to manage their own health care with adult urologists. However, common pediatric urologic conditions may be encountered by the adult urologist with more regularity. This review focuses on three relatively common conditions which may be identified in childhood, the consequences from which a patient may seek help from an adult urologist: cryptorchidism, varicocele, and Klinefelter syndrome.