OBJECTIVE: Herein, we address the surgical correction and outcomes of urine spraying with or without fistulae, and cosmesis over 12 years. We also analyze if any specific prior repairs were more related to their complaints i.e. cosmesis, spraying, and/or fistulae.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed hypospadias revisions by a single surgeon over 12 years. We included adolescents and young adults who complained of abnormal urinary stream and/or aesthetic complaints. Patients then evaluated the post op result as very good, good, acceptable, or unsatisfactory.
RESULTS: Of 542 patients who underwent revisionary procedures, 90 (16.6%) presented with complaints of urinary spraying, and appearance of the glans penis and/or meatus (see figure). Of these, 19 (21.1%) presented with aesthetic complaints alone, 37 (41.1%) presented with aesthetic complaints and spraying, and 34 (37.7%) presented with aesthetic concerns, spraying, and were noted to have urethral fistula either during preoperative examination or during surgery. 3/90 patients (3.3%) developed wound infection and dehiscence (one had a tubularized incised plate repair, another a Thiersch-Duplay repair, and the primary repair of the third patient was unknown).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents and young adults who underwent hypospadias repair during childhood can return with concerns regarding functional and aesthetic abnormalities of the glans penis. Glans sculpting and meatal contouring may be utilized to normalize the urinary stream and achieve a normal aesthetic appearance of the glans penis. Surgeons should follow these patients through adolescence and into adulthood, because complications from hypospadias repairs acquire greater significance later and young adults seek to normalize their phalluses.