当枪支被丢弃在水体中并被腐蚀时,它的外观被改变,确定浸泡时间可能对调查很重要。因此,在这项研究中,在180天内检查了四个手枪载玻片的腐蚀和质量损失。通过SEM/EDX和粉末X射线衍射(pXRD)对金属及其腐蚀产物进行了固态表征。对照NIST粉末衍射数据库分析pXRD以确定结晶相。来自SS416标准的文件,Llama和Ruger手枪滑道主要由铁合金组成。在溶液中180天后,pXRD表明,粘附腐蚀产物由1)γ-FeOOH和2)氧化铁(Fe3O4或Fe2O3组成。此外,pXRD分析表明,SS416标准的粘附腐蚀产物也由CrO3组成。Raven和Jennings手枪载玻片上的金属屑是铁镍锌和EDX的混合物,并对腐蚀产物进行了pXRD分析,当浸没在去离子水中时,表明产品由:1)γ-FeOOH,2)氧化铁(Fe3O4或Fe2O3),和3)ZnFe2O4或ZnO;其中Jennings粘附铁锈含有ZnFe2O4,Raven粘附铁锈含有ZnO。Further,这些合金的腐蚀产物的pXRD,当浸没在25PSU(实际盐度单位)溶液中时,表明产品由:1)ZnO,2)Zn(OH)2,3)α-Ni(OH)2和4)NaCl。因此,数据表明,金属组成和氯离子的存在对腐蚀速率和产物有显著影响,并表明Cl(-)的存在不仅改变了腐蚀速率,还有腐蚀物种本身。虽然氯化物驱动腐蚀过程的机理和速率提供了关于在浸没条件之间观察到的不同氧化物和氢氧化物的解释,他们没有解释手枪之间的差异。因此,使用一种通用方法,其中腐蚀产物的表面积覆盖率是唯一的考虑因素,这不足以确定自浸没以来的时间。尝试确定自浸没以来的时间将需要对指定环境中给定金属混合物的腐蚀机理的先验知识。本文描述的结果给出了在高和低Cl(-)环境中驱动该过程的可能腐蚀机制的指示,并显示了包括金属成分的必要性,任何试图阐明用于法医应用的手枪浸入时间的模型中的铁锈成分和离子浓度。
When a firearm has been disposed of in a body of water and becomes corroded, its appearance is altered and determining a time-since-immersion may be of import to the investigation. Therefore, in this study, the corrosion and mass loss of four handgun slides over a period of 180days were examined. Solid-state characterization of the metals and their corrosion products via SEM/EDX and powder X-ray Diffraction (pXRD) was performed. The pXRDs were analyzed against the NIST Powder Diffraction Database to determine the crystalline phases. Filings from the SS416 standard, Llama and Ruger handgun slide predominantly consisted of iron alloys. After 180-days in solution, pXRD indicated that the adherent corrosion products consisted of 1) γ-FeOOH and 2) iron oxide (Fe3O4 or Fe2O3). Additionally, pXRD analysis indicated that the adherent corrosion products of the SS416 standard also consisted of CrO3. Metal filings from the Raven and Jennings handgun slides were a mixture of iron-nickel-zinc and EDX and pXRD analyses of the corrosion products, when submersed in deionized water, indicated that the products consisted of: 1) γ-FeOOH, 2) iron oxide (Fe3O4 or Fe2O3), and 3) ZnFe2O4 or ZnO; where the Jennings adherent rust contained ZnFe2O4 and the Raven adherent rust contained ZnO. Further, pXRD of the corrosion products from these alloys, when submersed in 25 PSU (Practical Salinity Unit) solution, indicated that the products consisted of: 1) ZnO, 2) Zn(OH)2, 3) α-Ni(OH)2, and 4) NaCl. The data thus indicated that both metal composition and the presence of chloride ions had significant impacts on rates and products of corrosion and suggest that the presence of Cl(-) changes not only the rate of corrosion, but also the corroding species itself. While mechanisms and rates of the chloride driven corrosion processes offer explanations as to the different oxides and hydroxides observed between immersion conditions, they do not offer an explanation for the differences observed between handguns. Therefore, utilizing a general approach where surface area coverage of corrosion products is the sole consideration is not sufficient to determine time-since-immersion. Attempts to determine a time-since-immersion would require a priori knowledge of the mechanism of corrosion for a given metal mixture within a specified environment. The results described herein give indications as to the possible corrosion mechanism driving the process in high and low Cl(-) environments and show the necessity of including the metal composition, rust composition and ion concentration in any models that attempt to elucidate the time-since-immersion of handguns for forensic applications.