standardized nursing terminology

标准化护理术语
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们的文章证明了使用经过验证的框架创建ChatGPT提示的有效性,该提示为一名假设的老年肺癌患者生成有效的护理计划建议。
    方法:本研究描述了创建ChatGPT提示的方法,该方法可生成一致的护理计划建议,并将其应用于肺癌病例场景。在将患者病情的护理评估输入ChatGPT后,我们要求它生成护理计划建议。随后,我们评估了ChatGPT制定的护理计划的质量.
    结果:虽然并非所有建议的护理计划术语(16个中的11个)都使用了标准化的护理术语,ChatGPT生成的护理计划在范围和性质上与黄金标准紧密匹配,正确优先考虑充氧和通风需求。
    结论:使用经过验证的框架提示通过ChatGPT生成护理计划建议,证明了其作为优化癌症护理文档的决策支持工具的潜在价值。
    OBJECTIVE: Our article demonstrates the effectiveness of using a validated framework to create a ChatGPT prompt that generates valid nursing care plan suggestions for one hypothetical older patient with lung cancer.
    METHODS: This study describes the methodology for creating ChatGPT prompts that generate consistent care plan suggestions and its application for a lung cancer case scenario. After entering a nursing assessment of the patient\'s condition into ChatGPT, we asked it to generate care plan suggestions. Subsequently, we assessed the quality of the care plans produced by ChatGPT.
    RESULTS: While not all the suggested care plan terms (11 out of 16) utilized standardized nursing terminology, the ChatGPT-generated care plan closely matched the gold standard in scope and nature, correctly prioritizing oxygenation and ventilation needs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using a validated framework prompt to generate nursing care plan suggestions with ChatGPT demonstrates its potential value as a decision support tool for optimizing cancer care documentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:基于ICNP®,为患有呼吸系统疾病和新冠肺炎或患有新冠肺炎后呼吸道疾病的人建立专门的护理术语。
    方法:方法学研究分为两个阶段:(1)确定从文献中选择的健康优先事项的相关概念;(2)将已确定的概念与ICNP®版本2019/2020中包含的概念进行交叉映射。
    结果:从文献中提取了9460个术语,其中4065项因与研究对象无关而被排除,5395项提交给作图技术,在ICNP®中产生290个常数项和5134个非常数项。常数项被分类为以下轴:焦点轴上的120,13在判断中,48在行动中23在位置38手段,八个时间和一个客户。此外,绘制了36项护理诊断/结果和3项护理干预措施。
    结论:该术语将支持护理团队提供的护理质量以及患者数据的手动和电子记录。
    OBJECTIVE: To build a specialized nursing terminology for the care of people with respiratory diseases and Covid-19 or who have respiratory diseases after Covid-19, based on ICNP®.
    METHODS: Methodological study developed in two stages: (1) identification of the relevant concepts for the health priority chosen from the literature; (2) cross-mapping of the identified concepts with the concepts contained in ICNP® version 2019/2020.
    RESULTS: 9460 terms were extracted from the literature, of which 4065 terms were excluded because they were not related to the object of study and 5395 were submitted to the mapping technique, resulting in 290 constant terms in the ICNP® and 5134 non-constant terms. The constant terms were classified into the following axes: 120 in the Focus axis, 13 in Judgment, 48 in Action, 23 in Location, 38 in Means, eight in Time and one in Client. In addition, 36 nursing diagnoses/outcomes and three nursing interventions were mapped.
    CONCLUSIONS: The terminology will support the quality of care provided by the nursing team and the manual and electronic recording of patient data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在促进韩国医院使用基于国际护理实践分类(ICNP)的算法生成和通过大型语言模型的评估来创建高质量的标准化护理陈述。
    方法:我们使用ICNP的117个概念和概念组成模型,通过算法生成了与急性呼吸道护理相关的15.972个陈述。人类审稿人,生成预训练变压器4.0(GPT-4.0),和来自变压器的Bio_Clinical双向编码器表示(BERT)评估生成的语句的有效性。GPT-4.0和Bio_ClinicalBERT的评估是在有或没有上下文信息和培训的情况下进行的。
    结果:在生成的语句中,2207名专家审稿人认为有效。GPT-4.0显示零拍AUC为0.857,随上下文信息加重。Bio_ClinicalBERT,培训后,明显改善,AUC达到0.998。
    结论:Bio_ClinicalBERT有效地验证了自动生成的护理报表,提供有前途的解决方案,以增强和简化医疗保健文档流程。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to facilitate the creation of quality standardized nursing statements in South Korea\'s hospitals using algorithmic generation based on the International Classifications of Nursing Practice (ICNP) and evaluation through Large Language Models.
    METHODS: We algorithmically generated 15 972 statements related to acute respiratory care using 117 concepts and concept composition models of ICNP. Human reviewers, Generative Pre-trained Transformers 4.0 (GPT-4.0), and Bio_Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) evaluated the generated statements for validity. The evaluation by GPT-4.0 and Bio_ClinicalBERT was conducted with and without contextual information and training.
    RESULTS: Of the generated statements, 2207 were deemed valid by expert reviewers. GPT-4.0 showed a zero-shot  AUC of 0.857, which aggravated with contextual information. Bio_ClinicalBERT, after training, significantly improved, reaching an AUC of 0.998.
    CONCLUSIONS: Bio_ClinicalBERT effectively validates auto-generated nursing statements, offering a promising solution to enhance and streamline healthcare documentation processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本综述的目的是确定迄今为止在急诊科报告的护理敏感结局。
    进行了雨伞审查。四个数据库,CINAHL,Pubmed,WebofScience和Scopus,从成立到2022年10月都进行了搜索。MeSH术语是:“护理”,“敏感性和特异性”,\"紧急服务,医院\“,“护理”。两名评审员根据入选标准独立筛选研究,提取数据并使用SIGN工具评估研究质量。对纳入研究的结果进行了总结,并在主题中进行了叙述分析。该研究被纳入PROSPERO注册中心(CRD42022376941),并遵循PRISMA指南。
    搜索策略产生了2289条记录。重复删除后,title,摘要和全文资格筛选,审查包括9项系统审查。总共报告了35例护理敏感结局。描述最多的结果是等待时间,患者满意度和治疗时间。死亡率测量得越少,没有被看见和身体功能。在报告主题中综合护理敏感结果,衡量最多的结果是在安全域内(n=20),其次是临床(n=9),感知(n=5)和最少探索的功能域(n=1)。
    急诊护理实践中的护理敏感结果研究是一个仍处于早期阶段的概念挑战。在这篇综述中确定了一些对护理敏感的结果,可以评估急诊科护理对患者结果的贡献。需要进一步的研究来探索对急诊护理敏感的患者预后。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this review was to identify reported nursing-sensitive outcomes in the Emergency Department to date.
    UNASSIGNED: An Umbrella review was conducted. Four databases, CINAHL, Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus, were searched from inception until October 2022. MeSH terms were: \"nursing\", \"sensitivity and specificity\", \"emergency service, hospital\", \"nursing care\". Two reviewers independently screened studies against the inclusion criteria for eligibility, extracted data and assessed study quality with the SIGN tool. Results of the included studies were summarized and described in themes for narrative analysis. The study was enrolled in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022376941) and PRISMA guidelines were followed.
    UNASSIGNED: The search strategy yielded 2289 records. After duplicate removal, title, abstract and full-text eligibility screening, nine systematic reviews were included in the review. A total of 35 nursing-sensitive outcomes were reported. The most described outcomes were waiting times, patient satisfaction and time to treatment. The less measured were mortality, left without being seen and physical function. Synthesizing nursing-sensitive outcomes in themes for reporting, the most measured outcomes were within the safety domain (n=20), followed by the clinical (n=9), perceptual (n=5) and the least explored functional domain (n=1).
    UNASSIGNED: Nursing sensitive outcomes research in emergency nursing practice is a conceptual challenge still in its early stage. Several nursing-sensitive outcomes were identified in this review that can evaluate the contribution of emergency department nursing care to patient outcomes. Further research is required to explore patient outcomes sensitive to emergency nursing care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用NANDA-I的分类法II识别和分析入住重症监护病房的COVID-19患者病历中列出的护理诊断。背景:COVID-19是一种行为异质性的复杂疾病,在大流行期间,重症监护护士在准确识别相关体征和症状方面的作用变得更加重要。护士依靠分类系统或分类法来规范实践中的概念和语言。方法:这项定量研究采用了描述性和个性化的方法,利用交叉映射方法。数据来自2020年7月至2021年3月在巴西东北部一家医院的57名重症监护患者的医疗记录。三名研究人员分析了地图诊断,使用内容验证指数和Fleiss\'Kappa评估协议。结果:在列出的护理诊断中,54.28%被发现是标准化的,45.71%有相应的护理诊断,在研究中使用的参考分类法中,5.71%的诊断结果不相同。由于在同一患者中进行多种护理诊断的可能性,最常见的诊断是成人压力性损伤的风险(66.66%),成年人跌倒的风险(64.91%),和感染风险(45.61%)。在映射的37个诊断中,风险诊断是最普遍的,如果及早发现可以预防.结论:该研究强调了在ICU对COVID-19患者进行标准化护理诊断的重要性,以及需要准确识别和预防风险诊断,以加强患者护理并改善预后。
    To identify and analyze the nursing diagnoses listed in the medical records of COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit using Taxonomy II of NANDA-I. Background: COVID-19 is a complex disease with heterogeneous behaviors, and the role of intensive care nurses in accurately identifying related signs and symptoms has become even more critical during the pandemic. Nurses rely on classification systems or taxonomies to standardize concepts and language in practice. Method: This quantitative study employed a descriptive and individual approach, utilizing the cross-mapping method. Data were collected from 57 medical records of critical care patients in a hospital in northeastern Brazil between July 2020 and March 2021. Three researchers analyzed the mapped diagnoses, and agreement was assessed using the Content Validation Index and Fleiss\' Kappa. Results: Among the listed nursing diagnoses, 54.28% were found to be standardized, 45.71% had corresponding nursing diagnoses, and 5.71% did not have an equivalent diagnosis in the reference taxonomy used in the study. Due to the possibility of multiple nursing diagnoses in the same patient, the most frequent diagnoses were Risk of pressure injury in adults (66.66%), Risk of falls in adults (64.91%), and Risk of infection (45.61%). Among the 37 diagnoses mapped, the risk diagnoses were the most prevalent and could be prevented if identified early. Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of standardized nursing diagnoses in the ICU for COVID-19 patients and the need for accurate identification and prevention of risk diagnoses to enhance patient care and improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲护理路径(ENP)是一种专业的护理语言,利用软件来绘制护理过程并将数据用于研究目的,过程控制,和人员需求计算。然而,缺乏国际上专门为CKD营养管理设计的术语系统和子集。这项研究的目的是为慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的营养管理创建标准化护理术语的子集。
    根据子集开发指南,进行了四个研究步骤:(i)ENP3.2版的翻译(关于肾脏疾病的章节)和对ENP框架结构和编码规则的理解;(ii)识别相关的六维护理术语;(iii)创建子集的框架;(iv)专家的审查和验证.
    作为本项目的一部分,创建了CKD营养护理的一个子集,包括630个术语,有17种与护理诊断相关的因果关系,115个症状,31个原因,34个目标/成果,420个干预规范和13个资源,包括新制定的护理条款。子集中的所有术语均使用六步维护程序和SAPIM模式下的临床营养管理标准路径创建。
    此术语子集可以促进CKD营养管理中的标准化护理报告,用于规范护理实践,量化护理,服务,关于护理决策的指导,促进CKD营养数据的交流和使用,并为在中国创建标准化的护理术语子集提供参考。
    UNASSIGNED: European Nursing care Pathways (ENP) is a professional care language that utilizes software to map care processes and utilize the data for research purposes, process control, and personnel requirement calculations. However, there is a lack of internationally developed terminology systems and subset specifically designed for the nutritional management of CKD. The aim of this study was to create a subset of the standardized nursing terminology for nutrition management in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
    UNASSIGNED: According to the guidelines for subset development, four research steps were carried out: (i) Translation of version 3.2 of the ENP (chapter on kidney diseases) and understanding of the framework structure and coding rules of the ENP; (ii) Identification of relevant six-dimensional nursing terms; (iii) Creation of a framework for the subset; (iv) Review and validation by experts.
    UNASSIGNED: A subset for CKD nutritional care was created as part of this project, comprising 630 terms, with 17 causal relationships related to nursing diagnoses, 115 symptoms, 31 causes, 34 goals/outcomes, 420 intervention specifications and 13 resources, including newly developed care terms. All terms within the subset have been created using a six-step maintenance procedure and a clinical standard pathway for nutrition management in the SAPIM mode.
    UNASSIGNED: This terminology subset can facilitate standardized care reports in CKD nutrition management, which is used to standardize nursing practice, quantify nursing, services, guidance on care decisions, promoting the exchange and use of CKD nutrition data and serve as a reference for the creation of standardized subset of nursing terminology in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:临床验证国际护理实践分类(ICNP®)的一个术语子集,以护理接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者。
    方法:对117例护理诊断/结果报表和199例护理干预报表进行临床验证评估的前瞻性研究。通过以下步骤实施:在巴西东南部的一家门诊诊所实施护理流程;准备案例研究;分析专科护士之间的协议。Kappa.使用Kruskal-Wallis一致系数和组内相关系数(ICC)。
    结果:样本包括50名慢性肾病患者。以几乎完美/完美的协议和出色的ICC评估诊断/结果和干预措施。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示评估之间没有显著差异。该研究允许对110个护理诊断/结果和195个护理干预措施的子集进行临床验证。
    结论:根据所提出的子集对接受保守治疗的慢性肾脏病患者的护理已适用于临床实践。
    OBJECTIVE: To clinically validate a terminological subset of the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP®) to care for people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment.
    METHODS: Prospective study of clinical validation assessment of 117 nursing diagnoses/outcomes statements and 199 nursing intervention statements. It was operationalized through the following steps: implementation of the Nursing Process in an outpatient clinic in Southeast Brazil; preparation of case studies; analysis of agreement between specialist nurses. The Kappa. Kruskal-Wallis coefficient of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.
    RESULTS: The sample consisted of 50 people with chronic kidney disease. Diagnoses/outcomes and interventions were evaluated with almost perfect/perfect agreement and excellent ICC. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that there was no significant difference between the assessments. The study allowed the clinical validation of a subset with 110 nursing diagnoses/outcomes and 195 nursing interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Care for people with chronic kidney disease undergoing conservative treatment based on the proposed subset has become applicable to clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建立并验证ICNP®的一个术语子集,用于在初级卫生保健背景下预防老年人跌倒,根据自我护理缺陷理论。
    方法:根据ICN建议和巴西构建术语子集的方法开发的方法学研究,分两个阶段:1)构建ICNP®护理诊断报表,结果,和干预措施;2)专科护士对陈述的内容验证。
    结果:共构建了182个诊断/结果和321个护理干预措施,经过28位专家的内容验证,以含量有效性指数≥0.80进行验证。验证后,这些陈述是根据自我护理要求组织的,大多数诊断/结局(51.6%)和干预措施(52.7%)被归类为健康偏差要求.
    结论:可以构建和验证ICNP®的术语子集,以与健康偏差要求相关的陈述为主,突出是在初级保健背景下预防老年人跌倒的第一个术语子集。
    OBJECTIVE: Build and validate a terminological subset of ICNP® for the prevention of falls in the elderly in the context of primary health care, in light of the Self-Care Deficit Theory.
    METHODS: Methodological study developed in accordance with ICN recommendations and the Brazilian method for constructing terminological subsets, in two stages: 1) construction of ICNP® statements of nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions; 2) content validation of statements by specialist nurses.
    RESULTS: A total of 182 diagnoses/outcomes and 321 nursing interventions were constructed, which were subjected to content validation by 28 experts, being validated with a Content Validity Index ≥ 0.80. After validation, the statements were organized according to self-care requirements and the majority of diagnoses/outcomes (51.6%) and interventions (52.7%) were classified under health deviation requirements.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to construct and validate a terminological subset of ICNP® with a predominance of statements related to health deviation requirements, standing out for being the first terminological subset for the prevention of falls in the elderly in the context of primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:护士在电子健康记录(EHR)中记录的护理计划是丰富的数据来源,可以生成知识并衡量护理的影响。不幸的是,临床数据研究网络(CDRN)数据信任中缺乏这些数据的集成,很大程度上是因为护理被记录在当地的词汇中,导致非标准化数据。数据信任中缺乏高质量的护理计划数据限制了旨在改善患者预后的跨学科护理研究。
    目的:将一个大型卫生系统的EHR中的患者问题和目标的本地护理计划术语映射到标准化护理术语(SNT),南达国际(NANDA-I),和护理结果分类(NOC)。
    方法:我们提取了护士使用的本地问题和目标,以记录两家医院的护理计划。删除重复项后,这些术语被5个映射者独立映射到NANDA-I和NOC。四名经常使用当地词汇的护士验证了映射。
    结果:83%的局部问题项被映射到NANDA-I标签,93%的局部目标项被映射到NOC标签。护士同意95%的映射。未映射到标签的本地术语被映射到相应术语的域或类别。
    结论:将护士在EHR中使用的本地词汇映射到SNT是使可互操作的护理数据可用于大数据信任中的研究和其他次要目的的基础步骤。这项研究是一个更大的项目建筑的第一阶段,第一次,标准化的管道,协调,并将佛罗里达州多家医院的护理计划数据整合到全州CDRNOneFlorida+临床研究网络数据信任中。
    BACKGROUND: Care plans documented by nurses in electronic health records (EHR) are a rich source of data to generate knowledge and measure the impact of nursing care. Unfortunately, there is a lack of integration of these data in clinical data research networks (CDRN) data trusts, due in large part to nursing care being documented with local vocabulary, resulting in non-standardized data. The absence of high-quality nursing care plan data in data trusts limits the investigation of interdisciplinary care aimed at improving patient outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: To map local nursing care plan terms for patients\' problems and goals in the EHR of one large health system to the standardized nursing terminologies (SNTs), NANDA International (NANDA-I), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).
    METHODS: We extracted local problems and goals used by nurses to document care plans from two hospitals. After removing duplicates, the terms were independently mapped to NANDA-I and NOC by five mappers. Four nurses who regularly use the local vocabulary validated the mapping.
    RESULTS: 83% of local problem terms were mapped to NANDA-I labels and 93% of local goal terms were mapped to NOC labels. The nurses agreed with 95% of the mapping. Local terms not mapped to labels were mapped to the domains or classes of the respective terminologies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mapping local vocabularies used by nurses in EHRs to SNTs is a foundational step to making interoperable nursing data available for research and other secondary purposes in large data trusts. This study is the first phase of a larger project building, for the first time, a pipeline to standardize, harmonize, and integrate nursing care plan data from multiple Florida hospitals into the statewide CDRN OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Network data trust.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患者教育是护士在护士主导的诊所(NLC)中的独立角色。患者教育结果的测量验证了护理教育干预是否对患者有积极的影响,这有助于确定是否需要改变护理。标准化的护理术语有助于评估教育成果。我们旨在基于护理结果分类(NOC)系统探索NLC患者教育的结果。
    审查是根据PRISMA指南进行的。我们搜索了\"Medline\"\"Embase\",\"WebofScience\",以及2000年至2022年间发表的文章的“Scopus”数据库。根据搜索策略,从PubMed检索到1157篇文章,Scopus,WebofScience,和Embase数据库。排除重复项之后,评估了978篇文章。阅读了文章的标题和摘要后,剩下133篇文章。下一步,文章进行了方法学评估,研究人群,和排除标准,之后省略了112篇文章,最后,全文共纳入21篇文章。我们使用对照干预研究的质量评估清单评估了所有纳入的研究。
    共有21项随机对照试验符合纳入标准。“生理健康”,“功能健康”,“社会心理健康”,“健康知识和行为”,和“感知健康”是作为NLC患者教育结果调查的护理结果领域。
    大多数结果与生活方式相关的慢性病有关,需要进一步的研究来确定在NLC中提供的患者教育对家庭/社会健康结果的影响.
    UNASSIGNED: Patient education is an independent role of nurses performed in nurse-led clinics (NLCs). The measurement of patient education outcomes validates whether nursing educational interventions have a positive effect on patients, which helps determine whether changes in care are needed. Standardized nursing terminologies facilitate the evaluation of educational outcomes. We aimed to explore the outcomes of patient education in NLCs based on the Nursing Outcome Classification (NOC) system.
    UNASSIGNED: The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched \"Medline\", \"Embase\", \"Web of Science\", and \"Scopus\" databases for articles published between 2000 and 2022. Based on the search strategy, 1157 articles were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. After excluding the duplicates, 978 articles were appraised. 133 articles remained after reading the titles and abstracts of the articles. In the next step, the articles were evaluated regarding methodology, research population, and exclusion criteria, after which 112 articles were omitted, and finally, 21 articles were included in the full-text review. We assessed all included studies using the Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies checklist.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 21 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. \"Physiologic health\", \"functional health\", \"psychosocial health\", \"health knowledge and behavior\", and \"perceived health\" were the domains of nursing outcomes investigated as Patient Education Outcomes in NLCs.
    UNASSIGNED: Most of the outcomes were linked to lifestyle-related chronic diseases and, further studies are needed to determine the effects of patient education provided in NLCs in terms of family/society health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号