serum tumor marker

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸腺肽β10(TMSB10)过表达是人类癌变的一般特征。它参与产生多种癌症的恶性过程。然而,关于TMSB10在结直肠癌(CRC)中的报道很少,其致癌作用的机制仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在阐明TMSB10在CRC中的生物学作用和致癌机制,并探讨TMSB10是否可能用作检测CRC的非侵入性血清肿瘤生物标志物的可能性。免疫组化成果显示TMSB10卵白在CRC组织中的表达普遍高于癌旁组织,与健康对照组相比,CRC患者血清中TMSB10含量显着升高。敲低-TMSB10增加细胞凋亡并诱导S细胞周期阻滞,并最终在体外和体内抑制细胞增殖。转录组测序和蛋白质印迹分析显示,敲低-TMSB10增加了p38的磷酸化并激活了p38途径,从而阻断了细胞周期并促进了细胞凋亡。一起来看,我们的研究表明,TMSB10可以作为检测CRC的微创血清肿瘤标志物。同时证明了TMSB10对CRC细胞增殖的有效调控能力,提示TMSB10和受TMSB10调控的下游效应分子可进一步作为一个有吸引力的靶点应用于临床术后化疗.
    Thymosin beta 10 (TMSB10) overexpression is a general characteristic in human carcinogenesis. It is involved in the malignant process of generating multiple cancers. However, there are only a few reports about TMSB10 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and the mechanism of its carcinogenetic effect is still poorly understood. The present study intends to clarify the biological roles and carcinogenic mechanism of TMSB10 in CRC and to explore the possibility whether TMSB10 might be useful as a non-invasive serum tumor biomarker in detecting CRC. Immunohistochemical results showed that TMSB10 protein expression in CRC tissues was generally higher than that in adjacent tissues, and the TMSB10 contents in serum of CRC patients was significantly elevated compared to that of healthy controls. Knockdown-TMSB10 increased apoptosis and induced S-cell cycle arrest, and finally inhibited cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Transcriptome sequencing and western blotting analysis revealed that knockdown-TMSB10 increased phosphorylation of p38 and activated the p38 pathway that blocked cell cycle and promoted apoptosis. Taken together, our study indicated that TMSB10 could serve as a minimally invasive serum tumor marker in detecting CRC. At the same time it demonstrates an effective regulatory capacity of TMSB10 on cell proliferation of CRC, suggesting that TMSB10 and downstream effector molecules regulated by TMSB10 could further be applied as an appealing target in clinical post-surgery chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血清肿瘤标志物(STM),广泛用于诊断,肿瘤的监测和预后评估,在一些非恶性肺部疾病中可以增加。迄今为止,关于STMs阳性的非囊性纤维化支气管扩张患者的临床特征的研究很少。
    目的:研究STMs阳性的支气管扩张的临床特征和指标。
    方法:回顾性收集2017年1月至2019年12月北京朝阳医院377例支气管扩张患者的临床资料。患者分为STM阴性组,根据STM阳性的数量,分别对单个STM阳性组和≥2个STM阳性组的临床特征进行描述和比较。采用多因素logistic回归分析模型对STMs阳性指标进行调查。
    结果:≥2STMs阳性组患者年龄较大(P=0.015),mMRC评分较高(P<0.001),发热较高(P=0.027)。此外,这些患者的白蛋白/球蛋白比值(A/G)也较低,白蛋白(ALB),前白蛋白(PAB)(分别为P<0.001,P<0.001,P<0.001)和较高的CRP,ESR和Fbg(分别为P<0.001,P<0.001和P<0.001)。年龄(OR1.022,95CI1.003-1.042;P=0.026)和受影响的叶数(OR1.443,95CI1.233-1.690;P<0.001)与支气管扩张患者的1个和≥2个阳性STM独立相关。
    结论:在支气管扩张患者中,≥2个阳性STMs与更高的炎症状态和更严重的放射学表现相关。
    BACKGROUND: Serum tumor markers (STM), extensively used for the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostic assessment of tumors, can be increased in some non-malignant lung diseases. To date, there is a paucity of studies regarding the clinical characteristics of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis patients with positive STMs.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and indicators of bronchiectasis with positive STMs.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 377 bronchiectasis patients was retrospectively collected from January 2017 to December 2019 from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. Patients were divided into the STM negative group, the single STM positive group and the ≥2 STMs positive group according to the number of the positive STMs. The clinical characteristics are described and compared separately. The multivariate logistic regression analysis model was used to investigate the indicators regarding positive STMs.
    RESULTS: Patients in the ≥2 STMs positive group were older (P = 0.015), had higher mMRC scores (P < 0.001) and developed higher fever (P = 0.027). Additionally, these patients also had lower Albumin/Globulin Ratio (A/G), albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PAB) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively) and higher CRP, ESR and Fbg (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). Age (OR 1.022, 95%CI 1.003-1.042; P = 0.026) and the number of affected lobes (OR 1.443, 95%CI 1.233-1.690; P < 0.001) were independently associated with one and ≥ 2 positive STMs in bronchiectasis patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The ≥2 positive STMs are associated with a higher inflammation status and severer radiologic manifestations in bronchiectasis patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)摄取的代谢参数(MPs)在正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)上的相关性。血清肿瘤标志物(STMs),非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了129例NSCLC患者(男性,78;女性,51),在2018年3月至2022年9月期间,在治疗前进行了基线TMB和STM测试以及18F-FDGPET/CT扫描。患者分为TMB高(TMB≥10个突变/Mb;n=27[20.9%])和非TMB高(TMB<10个突变/Mb;n=102[79.1%])组。进行二元逻辑回归分析以确定TMB高的独立预测因子。进行单变量和多变量线性回归分析以在对数尺度上确定TMB水平的独立预测因子。腺癌(ADC)的亚组分析,ADC与EGFR+,带EGFR-的ADC,进行鳞状细胞癌(SCC)。
    结果:对于ADC,所有议员(取消,SULmax,Sulmean,MTV,和TLG)在TMB高组明显高于非TMB高组;吸烟者(比值比[OR]=27.08,p=0.018),EGFR+(OR=0.03,p=0.033),KRAS+(OR=7.98,p=0.083),高CEA(OR=33.56,p=0.029),高CA125(OR=13.68,p=0.030)是TMB高的独立预测因子;所有MPs在对数尺度上与TMB呈显著正线性相关,以SULpeak为独立预测因子。然而,对于SCC没有观察到显著的相关性.
    结论:MPs和STMs可以预测ADC患者的TMB水平,并且可以作为TMB的潜在替代品,在通过非侵入性方法指导免疫治疗方面具有更高的价值和易于实施。
    To investigate the correlations between metabolic parameters (MPs) of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), serum tumor markers (STMs), and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    In this retrospective study, we enrolled 129 patients with NSCLC (males, 78; females, 51) who underwent baseline TMB and STM tests and 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans before treatment between March 2018 and September 2022. Patients were categorized into TMB-high (TMB ≥10 mutations/Mb; n = 27 [20.9%]) and non-TMB-high (TMB <10 mutations/Mb; n = 102 [79.1%]) groups. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TMB-high. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of TMB level on a log scale. Subgroup analyses for adenocarcinoma (ADC), ADC with EGFR+, ADC with EGFR-, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were performed.
    For ADC, all MPs (SULpeak , SULmax , SULmean , MTV, and TLG) were significantly higher in the TMB-high group than the non-TMB-high group; smoker (odds ratio [OR] = 27.08, p = 0.018), EGFR+ (OR = 0.03, p = 0.033), KRAS+ (OR = 7.98, p = 0.083), high CEA (OR = 33.56, p = 0.029), and high CA125 (OR = 13.68, p = 0.030) were independent predictors of TMB-high; and all MPs showed significant positive linear correlations with TMB on a log scale, with SULpeak as an independent predictor. However, no significant correlation was observed for SCC.
    MPs and STMs can predict the TMB level for patients with ADC, and may serve as potential substitutes for TMB with increased value and easy implementation in guiding immunotherapy through noninvasive methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:根据国际生殖细胞癌协作小组(IGCCCG)分类系统,对睾丸转移性生殖细胞肿瘤(GCT)进行风险分层。这种风险分类基于解剖学风险因素以及AFP的肿瘤标志物水平,HCG,和LDH评估睾丸切除术治疗后的化疗前。当使用睾丸切除术前标记水平时,错误的分类是可能的,可能导致患者过度治疗或治疗不足。目的是使用睾丸切除术前肿瘤标志物水平调查错误风险分层的潜在频率和临床相关性。
    方法:多中心注册分析,包括转移性非精原细胞瘤GCT(NSGCT)患者,由德国睾丸癌研究小组(GTCSG)的研究人员进行。根据不同时间点的标记水平,计算IGCCCG风险组。该协议使用科恩的kappa进行了测试。
    结果:1910例患者中有672例(35%)被诊断为转移性NSGCT,523(78%)对224个随访数据点有足够的数据.通过使用睾丸切除术前肿瘤标志物水平,106名患者(20%)将被错误地分类。72名患者(14%)被归类为高风险类别,34例患者(7%)被归类为低风险类别.科恩的卡帕为0.69(p<0.001),显示了两个标记时间点的使用之间的强烈一致性。错误分类的患者的治疗将导致72名患者的过度治疗或34名患者的治疗不足。
    结论:睾丸切除术前肿瘤标志物水平的使用可能导致风险分类不正确,随后可能导致患者治疗不足或过度。
    Metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis (GCTs) are risk-stratified according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification system. This risk classification is based on anatomical risk factors as well as tumor marker levels of AFP, HCG, and LDH assessed pre-chemotherapy after orchiectomy treatment. An incorrect classification is possible when pre-orchiectomy marker levels are used, possibly resulting in over- or undertreatment of patients. The aim was to investigate the potential frequency and clinical relevance of incorrect risk stratification using pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels.
    A multicenter registry analysis, including patients with metastasized nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT), was conducted by investigators of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG). Based on the marker levels at different timepoints, IGCCCG risk groups were calculated. The agreement was tested using Cohen\'s kappa.
    A total of 672 of 1910 (35%) patients were diagnosed with metastatic NSGCTs, and 523 (78%) had sufficient data for 224 follow-up data points. By using pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels, 106 patients (20%) would have been incorrectly classified. Seventy-two patients (14%) were classified into a higher risk category, and 34 patients (7%) were classified into a lower risk category. Cohen\'s kappa was 0.69 (p < 0.001), showing a strong agreement between the use of both marker timepoints. The treatment of misclassified patients would have resulted in an overtreatment of 72 patients or undertreatment of 34 patients.
    The use of pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels may lead to an incorrect risk classification and might subsequently lead to under- or overtreatment of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    原发性皮肤黏液癌(PCMC)是一种罕见的恶性皮肤附件肿瘤。复发通常是局部的,完整手术后的长期随访基本上包括皮肤的自我检查。我们报告1例血清CEA和CA15.3水平升高的转移性PCMC。由于难以区分粘液性乳腺癌的PCMC和转移,乳腺癌转移的假设被排除.这些肿瘤标志物有助于监测转移性疾病。因为转移性疾病是在几年似乎完全缓解后被诊断出来的,CEA和CA15.3可能允许临床医生更早地发现复发。虽然肿瘤生物标志物在PCMC中的应用并没有根植于临床实践,也没有在指南中提及。我们建议CEA和CA15.3对监测和检测早期转移性PCMC特别有意义.
    Primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma (PCMC) is a rare malignant skin adnexal tumor. Recurrences are most often localized, and long-term follow-up after complete surgery consists essentially of self-examination of skin. We report one case of metastatic PCMC with elevated levels of serum CEA and CA15.3. Because of the difficulty to differentiate PCMC and metastasis of mucinous breast cancer, the hypothesis of a metastasized breast cancer was ruled out. These tumor markers contributed to the monitoring of the metastatic disease. Since metastatic disease was diagnosed after several years of seeming complete remission, CEA and CA15.3 would likely have allowed the clinicians to detect the relapse earlier. Although the use of tumor biomarkers in PCMC is not rooted in clinical practice and not mentioned in guidelines, we suggest that CEA and CA15.3 could be of particular interest to monitor and detect early metastatic PCMC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:胃癌(GC)是人类最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。癌胚抗原(CEA),糖类抗原(CA)19-9和CA72-4均为胃癌诊断的血清肿瘤标志物。然而,报告三者合并诊断的研究结果各不相同.在这项研究中,系统评价了这3种血清肿瘤标志物的联合诊断性能.
    未经授权:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),和万方数据搜索有关血清肿瘤标志物CEA的文献,CA19-9和CA72-4在胃癌诊断中的应用.纳入标准是根据参与者设计的,干预,Control,结果,研究(PICOS)原则。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)评分量表评估文献质量。提取数据后,采用Stata16.0软件进行Meta分析。
    UNASSIGNED:最终共收录了10篇文章,共有6574名患者参与诊断,确认的GC分别为3,077,非GC分别为3,497。Meta分析结果显示,3种肿瘤标志物联合诊断的诊断灵敏度为0.67[95%置信区间(CI):0.54,0.77],特异性为0.89(95%CI:0.82,0.93),阳性似然比为5.9(95%CI:3.5,9.8),负似然比为0.38(95%CI:0.27,0.53),诊断比值比(DOR)为16(95%CI:8,32)。单独诊断CA72-4的敏感性为0.58(95%CI:0.40,0.73),特异性为0.86(95%CI:0.80,0.90),阳性似然比为4.0(95%CI:3.1,5.1),负似然比为0.49(95%CI:0.34,0.71),DOR为8(95%CI:5,14)。联合三项诊断和单独CA72-4诊断的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.87(95%CI:0.83,0.89)和0.84(95%CI:0.81,0.87),分别,差异有统计学意义(Z=4.86,P<0.05)。
    UNASSIGNED:在胃癌的诊断中,3种肿瘤标志物的联合使用比单一标志物诊断具有更高的敏感性和特异性。
    UNASSIGNED: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in humans. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, and CA72-4 are all serum tumor markers for diagnosis of gastric cancer. However, the results of studies reporting the diagnosis of the combined three varied. In this study, the combined diagnostic performance of these 3 serum tumor markers was systematically evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang data were searched for literature on serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, and CA72-4 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The inclusion criteria were designed according to the Participants, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study (PICOS) principles. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) scoring scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. After extracting the data, Stata 16.0 software was used for meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 10 articles were finally included, and a total of 6,574 patients participated in diagnosis, 3,077 for confirmed GC and 3,497 for non-GC respectively. Meta-analysis results showed that the diagnostic sensitivity of the combined diagnosis of the 3 tumor markers was 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54, 0.77], the specificity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.93), the positive likelihood ratio was 5.9 (95% CI: 3.5, 9.8), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.53), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 16 (95% CI: 8, 32). The diagnostic sensitivity of CA72-4 diagnosis alone was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.73), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.90), the positive likelihood ratio was 4.0 (95% CI: 3.1, 5.1), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.71), and the DOR was 8 (95% CI: 5, 14). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values of the combined three diagnosis and CA72-4 diagnosis alone were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.89) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.87), respectively, the difference was statistically significant (Z=4.86, P<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The combined use of the 3 tumor markers has higher sensitivity and specificity than single marker diagnosis in the diagnosis of gastric cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    BACKGROUND: The widespread introduction of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to durable responses but still many patients fail and are treated beyond progression.
    OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether readily available blood-based tumor biomarkers allow accurate detection of early non-responsiveness, allowing a timely switch of therapy and cost reduction.
    METHODS: In a prospective, observational study in patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, five serum tumor markers were measured at baseline and every other week. Six months disease control as determined by RECIST was used as a measure of clinical response. Patients with a disease control <  6 months were deemed non-responsive. For every separate tumor marker a criterion for predicting of non-response was developed. Each marker test was defined as positive (predictive of non-response) if the value of that tumor marker increased at least 50% from the value at baseline and above a marker dependent minimum value to be determined. Also, tests based on combination of multiple markers were designed. Specificity and sensitivity for predicting non-response was calculated and results were validated in an independent cohort. The target specificity of the test for detecting non-response was set at >  95%, in order to allow its safe use for treatment decisions.
    RESULTS: A total of 376 patients (training cohort: 180, validation cohort: 196) were included in our analysis. Results for the specificity of the single marker tests in the validation set were CEA: 98·3% (95% CI: 90·9-100%), NSE: 96·5% (95% CI: 87·9-99·6%), SCC: 96·5% (95% CI: 88·1-99·6%), Cyfra21·1 : 91.8% (95% CI: 81·9-97·3%), and CA125 : 86·0% (95% CI: 74·2-93·7%). A test based on the combination of Cyfra21.1, CEA and NSE accurately predicted non-response in 32.3% (95% CI 22.6-43.1%) of patients 6 weeks after start of immunotherapy. Survival analysis showed a significant difference between predicted responders (Median PFS: 237 days (95% CI 184-289 days)) and non-responders (Median PFS: 58 days (95% CI 46-70 days)) (p <  0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Serum tumor marker based tests can be used for accurate detection of non-response in NSCLC, thereby allowing early and safe discontinuation of immunotherapy in a significant subset of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估常用血清肿瘤标志物与肺腺癌和鳞状细胞癌复发之间的关系,并确定血清肿瘤标志物在以磨玻璃样为特征的肺腺癌中的预后价值。
    对2008年1月至2014年9月期间接受手术切除的2,654例非小细胞肺癌患者进行分析。血清癌胚抗原(CEA)水平,细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1),神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE),糖类抗原125(CA125),术前检测糖类抗原153(CA153)和糖类抗原199(CA199).用COX比例风险回归进行生存分析。
    在肺腺癌患者中,术前血清CEA升高(HR=1.246,95CI:1.043-1.488,P=0.015),CYFRA21-1(HR=1.209,95CI:1.015-1.441,P=0.034)和CA125(HR=1.361,95CI:1.053-1.757,P=0.018)与无复发生存率(RFS)明显相关。术前血清CA199水平升高预测肺鳞状细胞癌患者RFS恶化(HR=1.833,95CI:1.216~2.762,P=0.004)。术前血清CYFRA21-1(HR=1.256,95CI:1.044-1.512,P=0.016)和CA125(HR=1.373,95CI:1.050-1.795,P=0.020)是腺癌患者的独立预后因素,而血清CEA(HR=2.160,95CI:1.558,P=0.003)和CA125是腺癌的独立预后因素(0.475,P=
    术前血清肿瘤标志物在非小细胞肺癌中的预后意义与影像学特征和组织学类型有关。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the association between common-used serum tumor markers and recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma separately and determine the prognostic value of serum tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma featured as ground glass opacities.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,654 non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection between January 2008 and September 2014 were analyzed. The serum levels of carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) were tested preoperatively. Survival analyses were performed with COX proportional hazard regression.
    UNASSIGNED: Among patients with lung adenocarcinoma, elevated preoperative serum CEA(HR=1.246, 95%CI:1.043-1.488, P=0.015), CYFRA21-1(HR=1.209, 95%CI:1.015-1.441, P=0.034) and CA125(HR=1.361, 95%CI:1.053-1.757, P=0.018) were significantly associated with poorer recurrence free survival (RFS). Elevated preoperative serum CA199 predicted worse RFS in patients diagnosed with lung squamous cell carcinoma (HR=1.833, 95%CI: 1.216-2.762, P=0.004). Preoperative serum CYFRA21-1(HR=1.256, 95%CI:1.044-1.512, P=0.016) and CA125(HR=1.373, 95%CI: 1.050-1.795, P=0.020) were independent prognostic factors for patients with adenocarcinoma presenting as solid nodules while serum CEA (HR=2.160,95%CI:1.311-3.558, P=0.003) and CA125(HR=2.475,95%CI:1.163-5.266, P=0.019) were independent prognostic factors for patients with adenocarcinoma featured as ground glass opacities.
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic significances of preoperative serum tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer were associated with radiological features and histological types.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手术切除的I期肺腺癌(ADC)的预后差异很大。识别高危患者并优化治疗策略具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨组织学分级之间的关系,血清肿瘤标志物指数(TMI),形态学计算机断层扫描(CT)特征,以及I期ADC中公认的预后因子细胞增殖(Ki-67)。
    对182例经病理证实为I期ADC的患者进行术前CT检查。通过免疫组织化学获得Ki-67的表达。TMI是标准化血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)值的平方根。肿瘤阴影消失率(TDR)和其他形态学CT特征由两名放射科医生解释。组织学分级,TMI,对CT特征进行统计学评估以探索与Ki-67表达的关联。
    在单变量分析中,性别,吸烟史,包年,组织学分级,TNM阶段(IA和IB),血清CEA和CYFRA21-1状态,TMI状态,以及TDR,长轴直径,短轴直径,分叶,刺突,衰减类型,空泡化,血管浸润,血管会聚,增厚的支气管血管束,胸膜附着和周围纤维化与Ki-67表达显著相关(均P<0.05)。固体占优势的ADC具有最高的Ki-67表达,其次是微乳头状,乳头状和腺泡型ADC,而Lepidic占优势的ADC的Ki-67表达最低(P<0.001)。TDR与Ki-67呈负相关(r=-0.478,P<0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,性别,组织学分级,TDR和减毒类型是影响Ki-67表达的独立因素。
    Ki-67表达根据ADC组织学亚型而明显不同。高Ki-67表达与分化较差的I期ADC的男性患者独立相关,较低的TDR和实体瘤,这可能对I期ADC不良预后具有预后价值。
    UNASSIGNED: Surgically resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) has wide variation in prognosis. It is significant to identify high-risk patients and optimize therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to investigate the relationships among histological grade, serum tumor marker index (TMI), morphological computer tomography (CT) features, and a well-established prognosticator cell proliferation (Ki-67) in stage I ADC.
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative CT was performed in 182 patients with stage I ADC confirmed by pathology. The Ki-67 expression was acquired by immunohistochemistry. TMI was the square root of standardized serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) values. Tumor shadow disappearance rate (TDR) and other morphological CT features were interpreted by two radiologists. Histological grade, TMI, CT features were statistically evaluated to explore the associations with Ki-67 expression.
    UNASSIGNED: In univariate analysis, gender, smoking history, pack-year, histological grade, TNM stage (IA and IB), serum CEA and CYFRA 21-1 status, TMI status, as well as TDR, long-axis diameter, short-axis diameter, lobulation, spiculation, attenuation types, vacuolation, vascular invasion, vascular convergence, thickened bronchovascular bundles, pleural attachment and peripheral fibrosis were significantly associated with Ki-67 expression (all P<0.05). Solid-predominant ADC had the highest Ki-67 expression, followed by micropapillary, papillary and acinar-predominant ADC, while lepidic-predominant ADC had the lowest Ki-67 expression (P<0.001). TDR was negatively correlated with Ki-67 (r =-0.478, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that gender, histological grade, TDR and attenuation types were independent factors associated with Ki-67 expression.
    UNASSIGNED: Ki-67 expression differed distinctly according to ADC histological subtypes. High Ki-67 expression is independently associated with male patients of stage I ADC with worse differentiation, lower TDR and solid tumors, which might be of prognostic value for poor prognosis in stage I ADC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:组织因子途径抑制剂2(TFPI2)是一种新型的血清生物标志物,可将卵巢透明细胞癌(CCC)与交界性卵巢肿瘤(BOTs)和非透明细胞上皮性卵巢癌(EOCs)区分开。这里,我们检查了TFPI2术前诊断CCC的性能。
    方法:术前采集卵巢肿块患者的血清样本,在日本的五家医院需要手术治疗.TFPI2和癌症抗原125(CA125)血清水平的诊断能力区分CCC和BOT,其他EOC,和良性病变进行比较。
    结果:共分析351例患者,包括69例CCCs。CCC患者的血清TFPI2水平显着升高(平均值±SD,508.2±812.0pg/mL)比良性病变患者(154.7±46.5),BOT(181±95.5)和其他EOC(265.4±289.1)。TFPI2对CCC具有较高的诊断特异性(79.5%)。良性卵巢子宫内膜异位症患者,无患者TFPI2阳性,但71.4%(15/21)的患者CA125阳性.TFPI2在区分II-IV阶段CCC与BOT和其他EOC(TFPI2的AUC0.815对CA125的0.505)或子宫内膜异位症(TFPI2的AUC0.957对CA125的0.748)方面表现出良好的表现。与CA125结合使用时,TFPI2对CCC与BOT和其他EOC的诊断敏感性从43.5%提高到71.0%。
    结论:在临床实践中,TFPI2对CCC术前检测的高特异性已被确定的TFPI2截止水平所证实。TFPI2和CA125可能对难治性CCC的精确预测有很大贡献。
    BACKGROUND: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) is a novel serum biomarker that discriminates ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and non-clear cell epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Here, we examined the performance of TFPI2 for preoperative diagnosis of CCC.
    METHODS: Serum samples were obtained preoperatively from patients with ovarian masses, who needed surgical treatment at five hospitals in Japan. The diagnostic powers of TFPI2 and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) serum levels to discriminate CCC from BOTs, other EOCs, and benign lesions were compared.
    RESULTS: A total of 351 patients including 69 CCCs were analyzed. Serum TFPI2 levels were significantly higher in CCC patients (mean ± SD, 508.2 ± 812.0 pg/mL) than in patients with benign lesions (154.7 ± 46.5), BOTs (181 ± 95.5) and other EOCs (265.4 ± 289.1). TFPI2 had a high diagnostic specificity for CCC (79.5%). In patients with benign ovarian endometriosis, no patient was positive for TFPI2, but 71.4% (15/21) were CA125 positive. TFPI2 showed good performance in discriminating stage II-IV CCC from BOTs and other EOCs (AUC 0.815 for TFPI2 versus 0.505 for CA125) or endometriosis (AUC 0.957 for TFPI2 versus 0.748 for CA125). The diagnostic sensitivity of TFPI2 to discriminate CCC from BOTs and other EOCs was improved from 43.5 to 71.0% when combined with CA125.
    CONCLUSIONS: High specificity of TFPI2 for preoperative detection of CCC was verified with the defined cutoff level of TFPI2 in clinical practice. TFPI2 and CA125 may contribute substantially to precise prediction of intractable CCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号