BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic rectopexy is an established treatment option for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Recently, reduced port surgery (RPS) has emerged as a novel concept, offering reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional multiport surgery (MPS). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of RPS for full-thickness rectal prolapse.
METHODS: From October 2012 to December 2018, 37 patients (MPS: 10 cases, RPS: 27 cases) underwent laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy (Wells procedure) is the standard technique for full-thickness rectal prolapse at our hospital. RPS was performed using a multi-channel access device, with an additional 12-mm right-hand port. Short-term outcomes were retrospectively compared between MPS and RPS.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between MPS and RPS in the median operative time, the median blood loss volume, the postoperative complication rates, and median hospital stay duration after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced port laparoscopic posterior mesh rectopexy may serve as an effective therapeutic option for full-thickness rectal prolapse. However, to establish the superiority of RPS over MPS, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial is warranted.

Rectal prolapse is a relatively rare condition where the rectal mucosa protrudes out of the anal canal. The diagnosis is made through a physical exam and clinical evaluation, and surgical treatment options can vary. Anal polyps masquerading as rectal prolapse have rarely been described in the literature. A 79-year-old man presented with a four-year history of a bulging, protruding mass from his anus that is exacerbated with defecation and bowel movements. He was initially diagnosed with rectal prolapse and had a proctosigmoidectomy performed robotically. Shortly after the procedure, his symptoms recurred, and he was referred to a different surgeon for reevaluation. A large, prolapsed polyp was visible on the physical exam. A colonoscopy and an anoscopy were performed. The CT abdomen/pelvis revealed a mass within the rectum, and the biopsy showed an adenomatous polyp with high-grade dysplasia. The patient underwent a transanal excision of the rectal polyp, with symptoms permanently resolving. For an accurate diagnosis, it is crucial to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the patient\'s history, a physical exam, and an unusual clinical course of rectal prolapse. The rarity of large, prolapsed polyps, along with their similar presentation to that of other anorectal conditions, may have contributed to this patient\'s diagnosis of rectal prolapse and the subsequent proctosigmoidectomy in place of a transanal excision of a polyp. The palpation of a stalk on a physical exam should raise suspicion of a polyp, and further workup, such as a colonoscopy and/or anoscopy, should be conducted to confirm the diagnosis.

This study aimed to investigate genetic parameters for sow pelvic organ prolapse in purebred and crossbred herds. Pelvic organ prolapse was recorded as normal or prolapsed on the individual sow level across 32 purebred and 8 crossbred farms. In total, 75,162 purebred Landrace sows from a single maternal line were recorded between 2018 and 2023, while 18,988 commercial two-way crossbred (Landrace x Large White) sows were available between 2020 and 2023. There were 5,122,005 animals included in the pedigree. The prolapse in purebreds and crossbreds was considered two different traits in the model. Pedigrees of the crossbred sows were determined based on genotypes through parentage assignment. The average incidence rates were 1.81% and 3.93% for purebreds and crossbreds, respectively. The bivariate model incorporated fixed effects of parity group and region with random effects of contemporary group (farm and mating year and month at the first parity), additive genetic, and residual. Genetic parameter estimates were obtained using BLUPF90+ with the AIREML option. The estimated additive variance was larger in crossbreds than in purebreds. Estimates of heritability in the observed scale were 0.09 (0.006) for purebreds and 0.11 (0.014) for crossbreds, with a genetic correlation of 0.83 using a linear model. Results suggested that including data from crossbreds with higher incidence rate is beneficial and selection to reduce the prolapse incidence in purebred sow herds would also benefit commercial crossbred sow herds.

UNASSIGNED: Although more frequent in the adult population, rectal prolapse is a common anorectal condition that can occur in children and adolescents. While many cases spontaneously resolve without the need for intervention, the advent of newer minimally invasive procedures and operations have provided options for pediatric patients. Here, we review the pathophysiology, etiology, presentation, diagnosis and principles of management of rectal prolapse in the pediatric population as it has evolved over the past several decades.
UNASSIGNED: The literature was queried from free databases available to the public including the National Institute of Health National Library of Medicine MEDLINE and PubMed for manuscripts published from January 1, 1975 to December 1, 2023. Manuscripts without an accompanying English translation or those written entirely in foreign languages were excluded.
UNASSIGNED: Numerous conditions contribute to rectal prolapse in children, including constipation, gastrointestinal infectious and non-infectious etiologies, cystic fibrosis, malnutrition, neurogenic, anatomic, lead points, and abuse. Initial management of rectal prolapse is medical management, addressing the underlying condition associated with rectal prolapse along with attempted manual reduction. For patients with recurrent rectal prolapse, a variety of noninvasive and procedural management options are available including injection sclerotherapy and anal encirclement in addition to surgical rectopexy by open and newer minimally invasive methods.
UNASSIGNED: Despite significant advances in the evaluation, procedural and surgical management of pediatric anorectal conditions in the last few decades, there continues to be substantial variation in clinicians\' and surgeons\' practice for the treatment of rectal prolapse in children and adolescents. Much remains to be studied in the future to improve clinical outcomes for this patient population.

BACKGROUND: Perineal proctectomy is a complex procedure that requires advanced skills. Currently, there are no simulators for training in this procedure. As part of our objective of developing a virtual reality simulator, our goal was to develop and validate task-specific metrics for the assessment of performance for this procedure. We conducted a three-phase study to establish task-specific metrics, obtain expert consensus on the appropriateness of the developed metrics, and establish the discriminant validity of the developed metrics.
METHODS: In phase I, we utilized hierarchical task analysis to formulate the metrics. In phase II, a survey involving expert colorectal surgeons determined the significance of the developed metrics. Phase III was aimed at establishing the discriminant validity for novices (PGY1-3) and experts (PGY4-5 and faculty). They performed a perineal proctectomy on a rectal prolapse model. Video recordings were independently assessed by two raters using global ratings and task-specific metrics for the procedure. Total scores for both metrics were computed and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. A Mann-Whitney U test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to evaluate between-group differences. Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficient was computed to assess the correlation between global and task-specific scores.
RESULTS: In phase II, a total of 23 colorectal surgeons were recruited and consensus was obtained on all the task-specific metrics. In phase III, participants (n = 22) included novices (n = 15) and experts (n = 7). There was a strong positive correlation between the global and task-specific scores (rs = 0.86; P < 0.001). Significant between-group differences were detected for both global (χ2 = 15.38; P < 0.001; df = 2) and task-specific (χ2 = 11.38; P = 0.003; df = 2) scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Using a biotissue rectal prolapse model, this study documented high IRR and significant discriminant validity evidence in support of video-based assessment using task-specific metrics.

Rectal prolapse, characterized by the protrusion of rectal mucosa or full-thickness tissue through the anal canal, significantly impacts quality of life, necessitating prompt intervention upon diagnosis. This case report presents the management of rectal prolapse in two cases admitted to our institution presenting with complaints of a prolapsing anal mass and many associated comorbidities and their subsequent surgical management using the Thiersch procedure. Following the procedure, both patients were monitored postoperatively, discharged once vitally stable, and kept on regular follow-up. Surgery is the primary therapy for rectal prolapse, and while various surgical techniques address rectal prolapse, anal encirclement procedures like the Thiersch procedure have been largely replaced by newer abdominal or perineal approaches. However, it is a valuable option for select patient populations. The Thiersch procedure is an ideal modality for treating high-risk patients with rectal prolapse or those patients with poor compliance for more extensive procedures. It can also be used temporarily until a further definitive treatment is planned later in the future.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with external full-thickness rectal prolapse (EFTRP), the exact differences in postoperative recurrence and functional outcomes between laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) and perineal stapler resection (PSR) have not yet been investigated.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 330 elderly patients divided into LVMR group (n = 250) and PSR (n = 80) from April 2012 to April 2019. Patients were evaluated before and after surgery by Wexner incontinence scale, Altomare constipation scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire. The primary outcomes were incidence and risk factors for EFTRP recurrence. Secondary outcomes were postoperative incontinence, constipation, and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: LVMR was associated with fewer postoperative complications (p < 0.001), lower prolapse recurrence (p < 0.001), lower Wexner incontinence score (p = 0.03), and lower Altomare\'s score (p = 0.047). Furthermore, LVMR demonstrated a significantly higher surgery-recurrence interval (p < 0.001), incontinence improvement (p = 0.019), and patient satisfaction (p < 0.001) than PSR. Three and 13 patients developed new symptoms in LVMR and PSR, respectively. The predictors for prolapse recurrence were LVMR (associated with 93% risk reduction of recurrence, OR 0.067, 95% CI 0.03-0.347, p = 0.001), symptom duration (prolonged duration was associated with an increased risk of recurrence, OR 1.131, 95% CI 1.036-1.236, p = 0.006), and length of prolapse (increased length was associated with a high recurrence risk (OR = 1.407, 95% CI = 1.197-1.655, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: LVMR is safe for EFTRP treatment in elderly patients with low recurrence, and improved postoperative functional outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Clinical Trial.gov (NCT05915936), retrospectively registered on June 14, 2023.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common problem that can affect any aspect of the pelvic floor. Often, vaginal and rectal prolapse occur simultaneously. Prior case reports have suggested resolution of symptoms of rectal prolapse in those with concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse; however, the overall body of evidence is limited. We present the cases of two patients who had complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse after repair of a concomitant vaginal prolapse. Both patients underwent a traditional rectocele repair and perineoplasty, and subsequently reported complete resolution of their symptoms of rectal prolapse, which persisted at their six-month post-operative visits. The second patient ultimately canceled a previously scheduled rectopexy with colorectal surgery. Perhaps a rectocele repair with perineoplasty is limiting rectal mobility, and therefore eliminating its ability to prolapse or intussuscept and cause bothersome symptoms. We suggest that those with concomitant vaginal and rectal prolapse desiring corrective surgery first undergo a less invasive vaginal repair. Post-operative re-evaluation of the symptoms rectal prolapse might then demonstrate that a more invasive rectal prolapse repair, which may involve a colon resection and prolonged hospital stay, was not in fact needed. Further prospective and randomized study is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse in those who first undergo a vaginal repair.

(1) Background: Rectal prolapse is a benign condition that mainly affects females and the elderly. The most common symptoms are constipation and incontinence. The treatment of choice is surgical, but so far, there has been no gold standard method. The aim of this study is to compare the two most common intrabdominal procedures utilized for treating rectal prolapse: the resection rectopexy and the mesh rectopexy. (2) Methods: In this study, we conducted a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature and compared the two different approaches regarding their complication rate, recurrence rate, and improvement of symptoms rate. (3) Results: No statistically significant difference between the two methods was found regarding the operating time, the length of stay, the overall complication rate, the surgical site infection rate, the cardiopulmonary complication rate, the improvement in constipation and incontinence rates, and the recurrence rate. (4) Conclusions: Our study revealed that mesh rectopexy and resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse have similar short- and long-term outcomes. As a result, the decision for the procedure used should be individualized and based on the surgeon\'s preference and expertise.

暂无摘要。