UNASSIGNED: Early Warning Score (EWS) protocols are based on intermittent vital sign measurements, and aim to detect clinical deterioration in a timely manner. Despite its predictive value, its effectiveness remains suboptimal. An important limitation appears to be poor compliance with the EWS protocol and its variation between general wards. The current research does not yet provide an understanding of EWS compliance and variation in different nursing wards.
UNASSIGNED: To explore the variation in nurses\' compliance with the EWS protocol among patients with and without complications and between different nursing wards.
UNASSIGNED: In a retrospective single-center cohort study, all patient files from three nursing wards of a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands were reviewed over a 1-month period. Compliance was divided into three categories:1) calculation accuracy, 2) monitoring frequency end 3) clinical response.
UNASSIGNED: The cohort of 210 patients contained 5864 measurements, of which 4125 (70.6 %) included EWS. Significant differences in the measured vital signs within incomplete measurements were found among nursing wards. Compliance to monitoring frequency was higher within EWSs of 0-1 (78.4 %) than within EWSs of ≥2 (26.1 %). The proportion of correct follow-up was significantly higher in patients with complications, as was the correct clinical response to an EWS of ≥3 (84.8 % vs. 55.0; p = .011).
UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest suboptimal compliance with the EWS protocol, with large variations between patients with and without complications and between different general care wards. Nurses tended to be more compliant with the EWS protocol for patients with complications.

Background: Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) remains a common morbidity after gastrointestinal surgery. POGD is associated with delayed hospital recovery, increased length of stay, poor patient satisfaction and experience, and increased economic hardship. The I-FEED scoring system was created by a group of experts to address the lack of a consistent objective definition of POGD. However, the I-FEED tool needs clinical validation before it can be adopted into clinical practice. The scope of this phase 1 Quality Improvement initiative involves the feasibility of implementing percussion into the nursing workflow without additional burden. Methods: All gastrointestinal/colorectal surgical unit registered nurses underwent comprehensive training in abdominal percussion. This involved understanding the technique, its application in postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction assessment, and its integration into the existing nursing documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). After six months of education and practice, a six-question survey was sent to all inpatient GI surgical unit nurses about incorporating the percussion assessment into their routine workflow and documentation. Results: Responses were received from 91% of day-shift nurses and 76% of night-shift registered nurses. Overall, 95% of the nurses were confident in completing the abdominal percussion during their daily assessment. Conclusion: Nurses\' effective use of the I-FEED tool may help improve patient outcomes after surgery. The tool could also be an effective instrument for the early identification of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) in surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the assumptions and values that influence nursing health assessment practices among registered general nurses in general medical and surgical wards.
METHODS: The study was designed as a focused ethnography.
METHODS: A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore prevailing nursing health assessment practices of 13 registered general nurses in an attempt to explore the assumptions and values influencing health assessment practices in the study setting. Data were analysed inductively using an interpretive qualitative content analysis method.
RESULTS: Nursing health assessment practices, and underlying assumptions and values were underpinned by a central theme of a culture of low expectation relating to nursing health assessment. The culture of low expectation was highlighted in five themes: (1) Unsystematic Assessment of Health Status, (2) Purpose of Nursing Health Assessment, (3) The Role of Nursing Educational and Regulatory Institutions, (4) Ward Ethos and (5) The Role of Organizational and Ward Leadership.
CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of a holistic nursing health assessment framework with a clearly defined purpose of aiding nursing diagnoses can guide patient-centred care delivery and facilitate early recognition of physiological deterioration.
UNASSIGNED: Thirteen registered general nurses were interviewed, and the initial findings returned to them for validation.
CONCLUSIONS: The potential contribution of nursing health assessment to nursing practice and patient outcomes may not be fully realized if nursing health assessment is not situated within a holistic health assessment model with a clearly defined purpose for nursing practice.

UNASSIGNED: The study aims to describe Swedish RNs\' experiences of acute assessments at home. More patients with complex nursing needs are cared for at home due to an ageing population. Registered nurses (RNs) who work with home healthcare need a broad medical competence and clinical experience alongside adapted decision support systems for maintaining patient safety in acute assessments within home healthcare.
UNASSIGNED: A content analysis of qualitative survey data from RNs (n = 19) working within home healthcare in Sweden.
UNASSIGNED: There were challenges in the acute assessments at home due to a lack of competence since several of the RNs did not have much experience working as an RN in home healthcare. Important information was missing about the patients, such as access to medical records due to organizational challenges and limited access to equipment and materials. The RNs needed support in the form of cooperation with a physician, support from colleagues, and a decision support system.
UNASSIGNED: To increase the possibility of patient-safe assessments at home, skills development, collegial support, and an adapted decision support system are needed. Collaboration with primary healthcare, on-call physicians, and nursing staff, and having the opportunity to consult with someone also provide security in acute assessments.

While over 40 neonatal pain assessment scales have been published, owing to a lack of consensus and standardized metrics, there are more than 100 assessment indicators with varying descriptors and quality differences. This study aims to reach a consensus on optimal and comprehensive variables for neonatal pain assessment, leading to the development of a multidimensional neonatal pain response variable set. This study consisted of three phases: (1) A literature review was conducted to identify influencing factors and assessment indicators of neonatal pain response. (2) Panel meetings involving neonatal healthcare professionals evaluated and screened factors and indicators to develop an initial draft of the variable set. (3) Through two rounds of Delphi study achieved consensus, and determined the neonatal pain response variable set. Through a literature review and a panel meeting, the identified factors and indicators were categorized into contextual, physiological, and behavioral variables, forming an initial draft of the variable set. Sixteen professionals participated in two rounds of the Delphi study, with response rates exceeding 70%, and authority coefficients surpassing 0.7 in both rounds. The final iteration of the variable set includes 9 contextual variables, 2 physiological variables, and 5 behavioral variables.   Conclusion: Neonatal pain response variable set developed in this study is scientific, comprehensive, and multidimensional, aligning with the characteristics of neonatal pain response and clinically applicable. The inclusion of contextual variables enhances the ability to confront the complexity of clinical environments and individual differences. It can provide a practical and theoretical basis for clinical research on neonatal pain assessment. What is Known: • Neonatal pain assessment relies on scales used by healthcare professionals currently. But there is no \"gold standard\" for neonatal pain assessment. • While over 40 neonatal pain assessment scales have been published, owing to a lack of consensus and standardized metrics, there are more than 100 assessment indicators with varying descriptors and quality differences. Most of scales overlook the clinical environment complexity individual differences in pain responses, diminishing the accuracy and applicability. What is New: • In addition to the commonly used physiological and behavioral variables in the scales, we have incorporated contextual variables to better address the complexity of clinical environments and individual differences in pain responses. • Through an evidence-based approach, developed a neonatal pain response variable set comprising 9 contextual variables, 2 physiological variables, and 5 behavioral variables.

UNASSIGNED: Patient stress is often overlooked in the care of patients with neurological problems. Nursing theorists have previously heralded stress assessment through conceptual clarification, while clinical nurses in the health care system hold an ideal position for implementation of assessment and coordination of support. Integrated with a hospital assessment and support scheme, recognition of stress as a target of systematic assessment can lead to improved clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to describe and compare patient-reported outcome measures suitable for assessment of the stress response as symptoms in neurological patients.
UNASSIGNED: This study is an integrative review and concept development of patient stress based on qualitative and quantitative analysis of available self-reporting instruments.
UNASSIGNED: Instruments were retreived with a systematic search from PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science reference databases on August 2, 2021. Search terms associated with the concept of stress symptoms were used. Instrument inclusion was done with the guidance of authoritative symptom inventories, with partial confirmation by a second author to mitigate bias. In the analysis, the instruments included in the review were quantitatively described and compared. Insights from the instrument composition led to clarification of our concept of stress response to further refine the list of instruments suitable for self-assessment of the stress status. This study was not registered.
UNASSIGNED: Based on the inclusion criteria, 23 patient-reported outcome measures extending over a variety of stress concepts were included. The similarity of items among the instruments implied a symptom cluster delineated by 59 common symptom subclasses that were grouped together in a re-classification of instrument items. A comparative quantitative analysis prompted us to distinguish the concept of stress response from antecedent, consequent, and related concepts as a manifestation of mental, somatic, and behavioral domains. Ten instruments with items covering the three domains, each with unique qualities regarding number of items, measured spread, and letter count were described.
UNASSIGNED: Within an organizational framework, effective allotment among types of support can be founded on the patient\'s stress status and the stressors. The stress status manifests itself as a set of measurable symptoms. Optimal instruments for use in systematic clinical assessment of neurological patients\' stress status should satisfy the suggested specification of the stress response with a minimal number of items and concise wording. Finding and including the relevant instruments for analysis were the main limitation of the study.
UNASSIGNED: Stress of neurological patients needs to be assessed and addressed. We ranked 10 suitable instruments that can be useful in the assessment.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy, whilst treating tumours, can also lead to numerous adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, fatigue and kidney toxicity, threatening the physical and mental health of patients. Simultaneously, misuse of chemotherapeutic drugs can seriously endanger patients\' lives. Therefore, to maintain the safety of chemotherapy for cancer patients and to reduce the incidence of adverse reactions to chemotherapy, many guidelines state that a comprehensive assessment of the cancer patient should be conducted and documented before chemotherapy. This recommended procedure, however, has yet to be extensively embraced in Chinese hospitals. As such, this study aimed to standardise the content of pre-chemotherapy assessment for cancer patients in hospitals and to improve nurses\' adherence to pre-chemotherapy assessment of cancer patients by conducting a national multi-site evidence implementation in China, hence protecting the safety of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and reducing the incidence of adverse reactions to chemotherapy in patients.
METHODS: The national multi-site evidence implementation project was launched by a JBI Centre of Excellence in China and conducted using the JBI approach to evidence implementation. A pre- and post-audit approach was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the project. This project had seven phases: training, planning, baseline audit, evidence implementation, two rounds of follow-up audits (3 and 9 months after evidence implementation, respectively) and sustainability assessment. A live online broadcast allowed all participating hospitals to come together to provide a summary and feedback on the implementation of the project.
RESULTS: Seventy-four hospitals from 32 cities in China participated in the project, four withdrew during the project\'s implementation, and 70 hospitals completed the project. The pre-and post-audit showed a significant improvement in the compliance rate of nurses performing pre-chemotherapy assessments for cancer patients. Patient satisfaction and chemotherapy safety were also improved through the project\'s implementation, and the participating nurses\' enthusiasm and belief in implementing evidence into practice was increased.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the feasibility of academic centres working with hospitals to promote the dissemination of evidence in clinical practice to accelerate knowledge translation. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of cross-regional and cross-organisational collaborations to facilitate evidence dissemination.

OBJECTIVE: This research aims to develop a nursing assessment tool, based on Gordon\'s Health Functional Patterns, through a content validation by a committee of experts, applying a Delphi technique.
METHODS: An assessment instrument with 53 items has been designed. SITE: It is carried out within the framework of a doctoral thesis, for its implementation by midwives of Primary Health Care.
METHODS: The committee was made up of 16 professionals with a hide clinical, teaching and research experience who all participated in the entire validation process.
METHODS: It has been assessed as a whole and in each of the items through four rounds of consultations, establishing a positive assessment of more than 60% to accept each item, as well as incorporating the suggestions provided by the committee. The final version had to reach a unanimous consensus.
METHODS: All items were accepted with a score higher than 60%.
RESULTS: There were no contradictions between the inputs provided by the experts, so all of them were integrated into the final version that has a 100% approval by the committee.
CONCLUSIONS: After this process, a new assessment tool is presented to be applied by primary care midwives in the pregnancy monitoring. The questionnaire has been piloted with 50 pregnant women, determining the most prevalent nursing diagnoses, establishing the workload for the midwife of her implementation of individualized care plans to improve some health indicators of pregnant women.

UNASSIGNED: This work aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the Colombian Spanish version of the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC).
UNASSIGNED: A psychometric study was conducted to achieve the goal of this study, which measured face validity, content validity, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the Nu-DESC.
UNASSIGNED: . Face validity obtained a total Aiken V of 0.89, and content validity showed a modified Lawshe index of 0.92. When Nu-DESC was applied to 210 adult patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit, it was found that 14.2% had suspected delirium. The instrument showed a sensitivity of 91.6%, specificity of 95.6%, positive predictive value of 73.3%, negative predictive value of 98.8%, good internal consistency with Cronbach\'s α of 0.8 and good concordance according to Cohen\'s Kappa index of 0.788.
UNASSIGNED: The Spanish version of the Nu-DESC scale for Colombia has appropriate psychometric values for assessing delirium risk. In addition, this scale is easy to apply, so the adaptation of nursing personnel for its employability favors routine monitoring and timely detection of delirium.

OBJECTIVE: To explore and synthesise findings from qualitative studies on adult patients\' experiences of day surgery and the processes of recovery.
BACKGROUND: There has been a shift in the practice of elective surgery, from inpatient to ambulatory treatment. Accordingly, more patients are undergoing day surgery and expected to care for themselves at home. To our knowledge, an updated metasynthesis on patients\' experiences of day surgery across diverse contexts and continents is lacking.
METHODS: Meta-ethnography.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched for qualitative research in English published between 2006 and 2023. Noblit and Hare\'s meta-ethnographic approach guided the synthesis of findings from 12 qualitative studies, and the eMERGe Reporting Guidance was used in the writing of this article.
RESULTS: Four themes were revealed: (1) requests for tailored information, (2) challenges of recognising and understanding postoperative symptoms, (3) being dependent on continuous professional and personal support and (4) calling for individual adaptation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-ethnography indicates there is a need to improve information provision to better prepare patients for the processes of day surgery and recovery and promote their self-care abilities. Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring adequate levels of individualised care and support throughout the treatment process.
CONCLUSIONS: To improve quality of care in day surgery practice, implementation of interventions to enhance information provision and promote self-care during recovery at home may be considered. Pre-admission appointments that incorporate provision of tailored information and assessment of the patients\' individual needs of care and support, home conditions and access to assistance from family/friends can be recommended.