intellectual property

知识产权
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前许多基因工程治疗方法的一个显著限制是它们对强度的控制有限。定时,或其治疗效果的细胞背景。合成基因/遗传回路是合成生物学方法,可以控制生成,改造,或特定DNA的缺失,RNA,或蛋白质,并提供对基因表达和细胞行为的精确控制。它们可以被设计为通过仔细选择启动子来执行逻辑运算,压制者,和其他遗传成分。专利检索在Espacenet,产生了38项精选专利,其中15项最常见的国际分类。专利实施方案被分类为用于递送治疗分子的应用,治疗传染病,治疗癌症,治疗出血,和治疗代谢紊乱。描述了所选遗传电路的逻辑门,以全面展示其治疗应用。合成基因电路可以定制治疗干预的精确控制,导致个性化的治疗,专门响应个人患者的需求,提高治疗效果和减少副作用。它们可以是高度灵敏的生物传感器,其通过准确监测各种生物标志物或病原体并适当地合成治疗分子来提供实时治疗。合成基因回路也可能导致先进的再生疗法的发展和可根据需要产生生物活性分子的可植入生物装置。然而,这项技术面临商业盈利能力的挑战。基因电路设计需要针对特定应用进行调整,可能有缺点,比如来自多个监管机构的毒性,同源重组,上下文依赖,资源过度使用,和环境变化。
    A significant limitation of numerous current genetic engineering therapy approaches is their limited control over the strength, timing, or cellular context of their therapeutic effect. Synthetic gene/genetic circuits are synthetic biology approaches that can control the generation, transformation, or depletion of a specific DNA, RNA, or protein and provide precise control over gene expression and cellular behavior. They can be designed to perform logical operations by carefully selecting promoters, repressors, and other genetic components. Patent search was performed in Espacenet, resulting in 38 selected patents with 15 most frequent international classifications. Patent embodiments were categorized into applications for the delivery of therapeutic molecules, treatment of infectious diseases, treatment of cancer, treatment of bleeding, and treatment of metabolic disorders. The logic gates of selected genetic circuits are described to comprehensively demonstrate their therapeutic applications. Synthetic gene circuits can be customized for precise control of therapeutic interventions, leading to personalized therapies that respond specifically to individual patient needs, enhancing treatment efficacy and minimizing side effects. They can be highly sensitive biosensors that provide real-time therapy by accurate monitoring various biomarkers or pathogens and appropriately synthesizing a therapeutic molecule. Synthetic gene circuits may also lead to the development of advanced regenerative therapies and to implantable biodevices that produce on-demand bioactive molecules. However, this technology faces challenges for commercial profitability. The genetic circuit designs need adjustments for specific applications, and may have disadvantages like toxicity from multiple regulators, homologous recombination, context dependency, resource overuse, and environmental variability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究探讨了知识产权保护(IPP)在国家研究项目团队中增强激进技术创新(RTI)的作用。运用创新驱动理论和能力-动力-机会(AMO)视角。这项研究利用了来自中国各大学的336名国家研究项目团队成员的样本,研究机构,并对理论模型进行分析。此外,一种两阶段混合偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)方法,结合人工神经网络技术(ANN),用于评估假设。这项研究的实证结果表明,国家研究项目团队中IPP和RTI的强度之间存在正相关。研发投资强度(R&DII)被确定为主要预测因子,而综合领导力(IL)和团体潜力(GP)则发挥着至关重要的调节作用。这些开创性的发现扩展了创新驱动和AMO理论的范围,为国家研究项目组提出对IPP系统的改进提供积极的模型,最终提高RTI的实现。
    This study examines the role of intellectual property protection (IPP) in enhancing radical technological innovation (RTI) within national research project teams, using an innovation-driven theory and an ability-motivation-opportunity (AMO) perspective. This study utilizes a sample of 336 national research project team members from various Chinese universities, research institutes, and corporations to analyze the theoretical model. Additionally, a two-stage hybrid partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) approach, combined with artificial neural network techniques (ANN), is employed to evaluate the hypotheses. The empirical findings of this study reveal a positive association between the intensity of IPP and RTI within national research project teams. Research and development investment intensity (R&DII) is identified as the primary predictor, while integrated leadership (IL) and group potential (GP) play crucial moderating roles. These groundbreaking findings extend the scope of innovation-driven and AMO theories, providing a proactive model for national research project teams to propose improvements to the IPP system, ultimately enhancing the realization of RTI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中国的高质量发展离不开高质量的研究。由于大学是高级研究不可或缺的来源,分析大学-产业合作(UIC)对企业绩效的影响有助于我们理解大学对中国经济发展和创新活动的意义。由于现有研究没有关注UIC对中国企业生产率的影响,我们使用自然语言处理并通过匹配中国的知识产权和上市公司的运营数据库来研究这种合作对公司生产率的影响。实证结果表明,UIC可以通过提高企业创新质量来提高企业生产率,加强内部化效率,拓宽他们的研究视野。此外,UIC流程对提高技术和知识产权密集型行业的企业生产率具有显著作用。从UIC的角度来看,我们解读了中国的经济发展,为发展中国家利用大学缓解私人研发投资不足提供了新的见解。
    China\'s high-quality development cannot be achieved without high-quality research. As the university is an indispensable source of advanced research, analyzing the impact of university-industry collaboration (UIC) on firm performance helps us understand the significance of universities for China\'s economic development and innovation activities. As existing research does not pay attention to the impact of UIC on the productivity of Chinese firms, we examine the impact of such collaboration on firm productivity using natural language processing and by matching China\'s intellectual property and listed firms\' operations databases. The empirical results show that UIC can promote firm productivity by improving the quality of their innovations, strengthening internalization efficiency, and broadening their research horizons. Moreover, the UIC process has a pronounced effect on promoting firm productivity in technology- and intellectual property-intensive industries. From the UIC perspective, we interpret China\'s economic development and provide new insights for developing countries regarding using universities to alleviate the insufficiency of private R&D investments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在下面的叙述回顾中,我们讨论了大型语言模型(LLM)在医疗设备创新中的潜在作用,特别是使用生成式预训练变压器4的示例。在整个生物设计过程中,LLM可以提供提示驱动的见解,帮助问题识别,知识同化和决策。知识产权分析,监管评估和市场分析是LLM的关键应用。通过案例,我们强调法学硕士的变革能力,使信息获取和专业知识民主化,通过提供实时信息,促进医疗设备的包容性创新及其有效性,为所有经验水平的创新者提供个性化反馈。通过减轻进入壁垒,LLM加速变革性进步,促进既有利益相关者和新兴利益相关者之间的合作。
    In the following narrative review, we discuss the potential role of large language models (LLMs) in medical device innovation, specifically examples using generative pretrained transformer-4. Throughout the biodesign process, LLMs can offer prompt-driven insights, aiding problem identification, knowledge assimilation and decision-making. Intellectual property analysis, regulatory assessment and market analysis emerge as key LLM applications. Through case examples, we underscore LLMs\' transformative ability to democratise information access and expertise, facilitating inclusive innovation in medical devices as well as its effectiveness with providing real-time, individualised feedback for innovators of all experience levels. By mitigating entry barriers, LLMs accelerate transformative advancements, fostering collaboration among established and emerging stakeholders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文提供了对未来生物类似药竞争细胞和基因疗法(CGT)的潜力的早期分析,以降低价格并改善患者的获取,建立在一套独特的采访相关专家。我们的讨论涉及监管,制造,知识产权,和市场规模挑战。由于CGTs的复杂性,满足“高相似性而没有临床意义差异”的监管要求将是困难的。基因疗法可能是比细胞疗法更好的生物类似物开发候选者。当基因治疗生物仿制药包含与参考产品相同的基因序列时,应满足生物相似性,并且向量中的可变性满足高相似性标准。制造挑战,包括缺乏标准化平台,生产成本高,和复杂性,构成重大障碍。在制造过程中证明生物相似性也是重要的。知识产权壁垒,特别是专利,贸易保密,和监管排他性,可能会阻碍生物仿制药获得市场份额的能力,尽管最高法院最近的决定限制专利索赔的广度可以缓解未来CGT竞争的障碍,包括生物仿制药。最后,市场规模不足可能会造成障碍,尤其是治愈性治疗,作为参考CGT治疗后患者池缩小。
    This article provides an early analysis of the potential for creating future biosimilar competition for cell and gene therapies (CGTs) to lower prices and improve patient access, building on a unique set of interviews with relevant experts. Our discussion addressed regulatory, manufacturing, intellectual property, and market size challenges. Due to CGTs\' complexity, meeting the regulatory requirement of \'high similarity with no clinically meaningful differences\' will be difficult. Gene therapies are likely better candidates for biosimilar development than cell therapies. Biosimilarity should be met when gene therapy biosimilars contain the same genetic sequence as a reference product, and the variability in the vector meets the high similarity standard. Manufacturing challenges, including the lack of standardized platforms, high production costs, and complexity, pose significant obstacles. It may also be important to demonstrate biosimilarity within the manufacturing process. Intellectual property barriers, specifically patenting, trade secrecy, and regulatory exclusivity, could hinder biosimilars\' ability to gain market share, although recent Supreme Court decisions limiting the breadth of patent claims could ease barriers to future CGT competition, including from biosimilars. Finally, inadequate market sizes might create hurdles, especially for curative treatments, as patient pools shrink following treatment by the reference CGT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,通过双边协议和药品专利池的知识产权许可被用来促进低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)获得新的COVID-19疗法。将该模型应用于COVID-19的经验教训可能与未来流行病和其他突发卫生事件的准备和应对有关。在LMICs中提供新产品的负担得起的版本的速度是实现该产品潜在的全球影响的关键。在研发生命周期的早期启动时,在大流行期间,许可可以促进低收入国家创新产品的通用版本的快速开发。对合格厂家的预选,例如,在COVID-19大流行期间参与的现有仿制药制造商网络的基础上,分享专有技术和快速提供关键投入,如参考上市药物(RLD),也可以节省大量时间.重要的是在速度和质量之间找到良好的平衡。必要的质量保证条款需要包括在许可协议中,可以探索新的世界卫生组织上市机构机制的潜力,以促进加快监管审查和及时获得安全和质量有保证的产品。数字,容量,许可公司的地理分布和许可协议的透明度对供应的充足性具有影响,负担能力,和供应安全。为了促进竞争和支持供应安全,许可证应该是非排他性的。还需要建立模式,以降低开发关键的大流行疗法的风险,特别是在创新产品被证明是有效的和批准之前开始的通用产品开发。知识产权许可和技术转让可以成为改善制造业多样化的有效工具,需要探索区域制造业,以加快在低收入和低收入国家的大规模获取,并在未来的流行病中提供安全。
    During the COVID-19 pandemic, intellectual property licensing through bilateral agreements and the Medicines Patent Pool were used to facilitate access to new COVID-19 therapeutics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The lessons learnt from the application of the model to COVID-19 could be relevant for preparedness and response to future pandemics and other health emergencies.The speed at which affordable versions of a new product are available in LMICs is key to the realization of the potential global impact of the product. When initiated early in the research and development life cycle, licensing could facilitate rapid development of generic versions of innovative products in LMICs during a pandemic. The pre-selection of qualified manufacturers, for instance building on the existing network of generic manufacturers engaged during the COVID-19 pandemic, the sharing of know-how and the quick provision of critical inputs such as reference listed drugs (RLDs) could also result in significant time saved. It is important to find a good balance between speed and quality. Necessary quality assurance terms need to be included in licensing agreements, and the potentials of the new World Health Organization Listed Authority mechanism could be explored to promote expedited regulatory reviews and timely access to safe and quality-assured products.The number, capacity, and geographical distribution of licensed companies and the transparency of licensing agreements have implications for the sufficiency of supply, affordability, and supply security. To foster competition and support supply security, licenses should be non-exclusive. There is also a need to put modalities in place to de-risk the development of critical pandemic therapeutics, particularly where generic product development is initiated before the innovator product is proven to be effective and approved. IP licensing and technology transfer can be effective tools to improve the diversification of manufacturing and need to be explored for regional manufacturing for accelerated access at scale in in LMICs and supply security in future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    商标形象通常是消费者与产品或服务之间的第一种间接联系。公司依靠图形商标作为质量和即时识别的象征,寻求保护他们免受侵犯版权的侵害。一种流行的防御机制是图形搜索,将图像与大型数据库进行比较,以查找与类似商标的潜在冲突。尽管不是一个新的主题,最先进的图像检索在工业产权(IP)领域缺乏可靠的解决方案,数据集的内容实际上不受限制,抽象图像,对人类感知建模是一项具有挑战性的任务。现有的基于内容的图像检索(CBIR)系统仍然存在一些问题,特别是在效率和可靠性方面。在本文中,我们提出了一个新的CBIR系统,克服了这些主要的限制。它遵循模块化的方法,由一组负责检索的单个组件组成,维护和逐步优化商标图像搜索,大规模工作,未标记的数据集。它的泛化能力是使用多个特征描述来实现的,单独加权,并组合以表示单个相似性得分。评估图像的一般特征,边缘地图,和感兴趣的地区,采用基于分水K-Means段的方法。我们提出了一种图像恢复过程,该过程依赖于所有特征描述之间的新相似性度量。每天都会添加新的商标图像,以确保最新的结果。所提出的系统展示了及时的检索速度,95%的搜索具有10秒的呈现速度和93.7%的平均精度,支持其对实字IP保护场景的适用性。
    A trademark\'s image is usually the first type of indirect contact between a consumer and a product or a service. Companies rely on graphical trademarks as a symbol of quality and instant recognition, seeking to protect them from copyright infringements. A popular defense mechanism is graphical searching, where an image is compared to a large database to find potential conflicts with similar trademarks. Despite not being a new subject, image retrieval state-of-the-art lacks reliable solutions in the Industrial Property (IP) sector, where datasets are practically unrestricted in content, with abstract images for which modeling human perception is a challenging task. Existing Content-based Image Retrieval (CBIR) systems still present several problems, particularly in terms of efficiency and reliability. In this paper, we propose a new CBIR system that overcomes these major limitations. It follows a modular methodology, composed of a set of individual components tasked with the retrieval, maintenance and gradual optimization of trademark image searching, working on large-scale, unlabeled datasets. Its generalization capacity is achieved using multiple feature descriptions, weighted separately, and combined to represent a single similarity score. Images are evaluated for general features, edge maps, and regions of interest, using a method based on Watershedding K-Means segments. We propose an image recovery process that relies on a new similarity measure between all feature descriptions. New trademark images are added every day to ensure up-to-date results. The proposed system showcases a timely retrieval speed, with 95% of searches having a 10 second presentation speed and a mean average precision of 93.7%, supporting its applicability to real-word IP protection scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文为中国京津冀地区的知识流动提供了新的证据,涉及京津冀地区43个城市(区),基于中国国家知识产权局的发明专利转让数据。首先,从流动数量变化的角度分析了京津冀地区技术流动的特征,流动主体类型和空间分布特征。然后,构建了京津冀地区多层次的专利技术流网络,并分别探讨了各级网络的结构特征和节点特征。这项研究的主要发现如下。(1)随着时间的推移,专利技术流的数量一直在增长,研究期间表现出明显的阶段性特征。作为一个整体,京津冀地区市(区)内技术流量高于市(区)间。(2)京津冀地区多层次专利技术流网络呈现动态特征,随着越来越多的移动主体参与到专利技术流网络中,一些网络节点变得彼此更接近,小团体技术流动趋势显著增加。(3)企业是京津冀地区专利技术流网络的核心枢纽。个人发明专利技术转移也占有较高的比重,高校在京津冀地区专利技术流网络中的参与度也在逐步提升。(4)随着时间的推移,京津冀地区43个城市(区)的专利技术流动逐渐活跃,不再过分依赖某一城市(区)进行专利技术转移。
    This paper presents new evidence on knowledge flows in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, involving 43 cities (districts) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, based on the invention patent transfer data from the State Intellectual Property Office of China. First, the characteristics of technology flows in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are analyzed in terms of changes in the number of flows, types of flowing subjects and spatial distribution characteristics. Then, a multi-level patent technology flow network in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region was constructed, and the structural characteristics and node characteristics of each level network were explored separately. The key findings of the study are as follows. (1) The number of patented technology flows has been growing over time, showing obvious phase characteristics during the study period. As a whole, the intra-city (district) technology flow in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is higher than the inter-city (district). (2) The multi-level patent technology flow network in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region shows dynamic characteristics, with more and more mobile subjects participating in the patent technology flow network, some network nodes becoming closer to each other, and the trend of small group technology flow increasing significantly. (3) Enterprises are the core hub of the patent technology flow network in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Individual invention patent technology transfer also occupies a high proportion and the participation of universities and colleges in the patent technology flow network in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is gradually increasing. (4) Over time, the flow of patent technology in the 43 cities (districts) in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region has gradually become active and no longer relies excessively on a particular city (district) for patent technology transfer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:泰国表示有兴趣加入《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP),由12个国家组成的诸边贸易协定,其最初的化身包括美利坚合众国(美国)。当美国退出这项协议时,与药品相关的关键知识产权条款被暂停。如果CPTPP缔约方决定这样做,这些可以恢复。
    方法:本研究使用两种方案来评估如果泰国加入CPTPP并恢复暂停条款,CPTPP对泰国2020年丙型肝炎治疗制度的影响。
    结果:如果恢复暂停的CPTPP条款,并且泰国不愿意或不能够颁发强制许可,加入CPTPP可能会使成本增加十倍以上。根据2020年预算,这种可能情况的价格可能会使丙型肝炎治疗覆盖率降低90%.
    结论:加入CPTPP等需要加强知识产权保护的贸易协定,可能会损害泰国的丙型肝炎计划和其他依赖负担得起的仿制药的国家治疗计划。CPTPP还可以阻止泰国依靠自己的制药能力来生产维持其治疗计划所需的药物。
    BACKGROUND: Thailand has expressed interest in joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), a twelve-country plurilateral trade agreement whose original incarnation included the United States of America (USA). When the USA withdrew from this agreement, key intellectual property clauses relevant to pharmaceuticals were suspended. These could be reinstated should the CPTPP Parties decide to do so.
    METHODS: This study uses two scenarios to cost the impact the CPTPP would have had on Thailand\'s 2020 hepatitis C treatment regime if Thailand joined the CPTPP and suspended clauses were reinstated.
    RESULTS: Joining the CPTPP could have increased the cost more than tenfold if suspended CPTPP clauses were reinstated and Thailand was not willing or able to issue compulsory licenses. Based on the 2020 budget, the price for this possible scenario could have reduced hepatitis C treatment coverage by 90%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Acceding to trade agreements such as the CPTPP that require increasing intellectual property protection, could compromise Thailand\'s hepatitis C program and other national treatment programs reliant on affordable generic medicines. The CPTPP could also prevent Thailand from relying on its own pharmaceutical capabilities to manufacture medicines needed to sustain its treatment programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大学对研究商业化的推动凸显了知识产权(IP)政策在促进创新以及指导和管理研究商业化活动方面的重要性。本文对澳大利亚所有(37)所公立大学的知识产权政策进行了内容分析,着眼于政策目标,IP的定义,不同创作者创建的IP的所有权,和净商业化收入的分配。发现所有大学都主张对员工创建的知识产权拥有所有权,特别是当与就业或利用大学资源有关时。对于学生来说,政策倾向于平衡他们的权利和大学的利益,针对不同类型的学生参与,但是大多数政策的重点是研究生从事研究活动。虽然一些政策对访问者和附属机构创建的知识产权以及土著文化和知识产权(ICIP)有明确的安排,大约四分之一的政策没有为这些群体指定安排。收入分享安排各不相同,但通常会将净收入的三分之一到一半授予创作者,承认他们的贡献并激励进一步的创新。政策包括广泛的目标,从保护和商业化知识产权到促进创新和社会效益,反映了整个高等教育部门的不同战略。政策可能会受益于某些领域的进一步明确,例如学生或其他创作者群体的权利。需要进行研究以评估这些政策的有效性及其对创新和商业化活动的影响。
    The push towards research commercialisation at universities has highlighted the importance of intellectual property (IP) policies in fostering innovation and guiding and managing research commercialisation activities. This paper undertakes a content analysis of intellectual property policies of all (37) Australian public universities, focusing on policy objectives, definition of IP, ownership of IP created by different creators, and distribution of net commercialisation revenues. It is found that all universities assert ownership over staff-created IP, particularly when related to employment or utilisation of university resources. For students, policies tend to balance their rights with university interests, with nuanced approaches for different types of student participation, but the focus of most policies was on postgraduate students engaging in research activities. While some policies had clear arrangements for IP created by visitors and affiliates and Indigenous cultural and intellectual property (ICIP), about a quarter of policies did not specify arrangements for these groups. Revenue sharing arrangements vary but generally award something between a third to a half of net revenue to creators, to both acknowledge their contribution and incentivise further innovation. Policies included a broad spectrum of objectives, from protecting and commercialising IP to fostering innovation and societal benefit, reflecting varying strategies across the higher education sector. Policies could benefit from further clarity in certain areas such as the rights of students or other creator groups. Research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these policies and their influence on innovation and commercialisation activities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号