目标:COVID-19和黑人社区不成比例的治安最近引起了公众对反黑人种族主义(ABR)弥漫健康的社会意识,社会,和文化机构。然而,在不断变化的大流行背景下,关于应对ABR的公共卫生措施的实施知之甚少。本次范围审查的目的是提供2019年12月至2022年6月期间为解决北美司法管辖区ABR而采取的公共卫生举措的概述。
方法:2021年6月在MEDLINE进行了公共卫生倡议的搜索,OvidEmbase,EBSCost,CINAHL,Socindex,和Google。CA.包括那些侧重于布莱克的倡议,非洲侨民,或北美背景下的非裔美国人社区。社区主导的行动,以及初级卫生保健方面的举措,学术期刊,那些广泛关注种族化社区的人,被排除在这篇评论之外。
结果:这篇综述包括75篇文章,这表明ABR成为公共卫生的优先事项。解决结构性ABR的战略和行动计划是观察到的最常见的举措类型(n=21),其次是项目或干预措施(n=16),预算拨款或投资(n=8),工作队(n=7),组织能力指导和建议(n=8),以行动为导向的ABR声明为公共卫生危机(n=8),以及立法和授权(n=7)。倡议主要是两个或两个以上社会经济主题的交叉(n=23),而组织变革也很常见(n=16)。当前文献中的差距包括缺乏社区参与和对已确定的行动的结果衡量,这限制了对利益社区的机构问责。
结论:这项研究为公共卫生对社会正义的问责提供了见解。这项研究概述了上游干预措施的活动,组织变革,以及塑造反种族主义变革的资源分配,并要求那些计划旨在服务的人进行评估和投入。
OBJECTIVE: The syndemic that is COVID-19 and the disproportionate policing of Black communities have recently generated mass social consciousness of the anti-Black racism (ABR) pervading health, social, and cultural institutions. However, little is known about the implementation of public health measures addressing ABR in an evolving pandemic context. The objective of this scoping review is to provide an overview of public health initiatives undertaken to address ABR across North American jurisdictions between December 2019 and June 2022.
METHODS: A search for public health initiatives was conducted in June 2021 across MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSChost, CINAHL, SocINDEX, and Google.ca. Included initiatives were those focussing on Black, African diasporic, or African American communities in the North American context. Community-led action, as well as initiatives in primary healthcare care, academic journals, and those broadly focused on racialized communities, were excluded from this review.
RESULTS: Seventy-five articles were included in this review, suggesting that ABR emerged as a public health priority. Strategies and action plans to address structural ABR were the most common types of initiatives observed (n = 21), followed by programs or interventions (n = 16), budget allocations or investments (n = 8), task forces (n = 7), guidance and recommendations for organizational capacity (n = 8), action-oriented declarations of ABR as a public health crisis (n = 8), and legislation and mandates (n = 7). Initiatives were largely cross-cutting of two or more socioeconomic themes (n = 23), while organizational change was also common (n = 16). Gaps in the current literature include a lack of community participation and outcome measurement for actions identified, which limit institutional accountability to communities of interest.
CONCLUSIONS: This research provides insights on public health accountability to social justice. This research outlines activities in upstream interventions, organizational transformation, and resource allocation in shaping anti-racist change, and require evaluation and input from those whom initiatives are intended to serve.