Objective In this study, we sought to identify the predictors for occult nodal disease (OND) and compare oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing elective neck dissection (END) at the time of salvage laryngectomy (SLE) versus the observation group. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted involving all patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) necks who underwent SLE at a tertiary academic center over 12 years. A total of 58 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: END (n=39) and observation (n=19). Primary endpoints were OND, regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Univariate analysis was performed to establish the association between variables with Fisher\'s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test. Survival analysis was performed with the log-rank test. Results The cohort comprised 46 (79.3%) males and 12 (20.7%) females, with a mean age of 60 years. Pathological nodal disease was identified in five of 71 (7%) examined neck dissection specimens, with positive nodes found in levels II through IV. The only statistically significant predictor of OND was the rT3/rT4 stage (p=0.017). There were no differences in perioperative complications, RRFS (p=0.216), or DSS (p=0.298) between the END and observation groups. Conclusions In cN0 necks, the advanced recurrent T-stage (rT3-rT4) is a predictor for OND. As OND was found involving levels II, III, and IV in this study\'s specimens, formal lateral neck dissection should be the procedure of choice if END is to be performed alongside SLE. While END did not show a significantly higher morbidity profile versus conservative management in this cohort, the procedure did not improve loco-regional control or survival, even when stratifying by tumor stage.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) is an infrequent malignancy, and determining the optimal neck management for patients with cT3/4N0 MS-SCC remains a topic of ongoing debate. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognoses and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent either elective neck dissection (END) or elective neck irradiation (ENI) for cT3/4N0 MS-SCC.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with surgically treated cT3/4N0 MS-SCC, and the impact of different neck management strategies on regional control and disease-specific survival was compared using propensity score matching. The effect of surgical intervention on quality of life was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Of the 120 patients included, 36 underwent END. After propensity score matching, our analysis indicated that END did not lead to superior outcomes than ENI, as demonstrated by comparable rates of regional control (p = 0.990) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.999). However, in the 70 returned questionnaires, patients who underwent END reported higher scores in the domains of appearance, chewing, and speech than did patients who underwent ENI.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that while END and ENI contribute to similar prognoses, END yields superior functional outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Optimal neck management remains unclear in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with parotid metastasis. Our goal was to compare the impact of different cervical treatments on HNcSCC with parotid metastasis.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were retrospectively included. The primary outcome variables were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The impacts of observation, elective neck irradiation (ENI), and elective neck dissection (END) were analyzed using the Cox model and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
UNASSIGNED: In total, 268 patients were enrolled. In the Cox model for RC, compared with ENI, observation was associated with a significantly higher risk of regional recurrence (p = 0.001, HR = 2.50, 95%CI = 1.45-4.30). However, END showed a comparable influence on regional recurrence (p = 0.246, HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.38-1.28). In the Cox model for DSS, END demonstrated a similar HR of 0.62 (95%CI = 0.30-1.26) compared to ENI (p = 0.184). However, patients who underwent observation were associated with an additional nearly twofold risk of cancer-related mortality (HR = 2.85, 95%CI = 1.55-5.23). Subgroup analysis showed that ENI predicted comparable RC (p = 0.389) and DSS (p = 0.346) in patients with one or two metastatic parotid lymph nodes, but worse RC (p = 0.007) and DSS (p = 0.024) in patients with more than three positive lymph nodes.
UNASSIGNED: In HNcSCC with parotid metastasis, elective treatment of neck lymph nodes with END or ENI should always be performed.

Background: Early-stage tongue cancer has a good prognosis in general; however, high-risk patients with late cervical lymph node and distant metastases have a poor prognosis. Elective neck dissection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy are considered for these patients, although no clear criteria have been identified for their evaluation. Methods: This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the predictive factors for late cervical lymph node and distant metastases in 102 patients with cT1-2N0 tongue cancer. The data regarding the demographic characteristics, as well as the depth of invasion, tumor budding, histological grade, and tumor-stromal ratio, among other things, were extracted from medical records. Results: We found that the potential lymph node metastasis rate was 27.5%. The significant clinical predictors of late cervical lymph node metastasis were the tumor thickness and endophytic growth pattern and the significant histopathological factors were poorly and moderately differentiated tumors and ≥3 tumor buds. In addition, the prognostic factors for distant metastasis included ≥4 lymph node metastases, ≥7 tumor budding, and moderate and poor tumor differentiation. Conclusions: The usefulness of tumor budding as a predictor of metastasis for tongue cancer was suggested. The findings of this study can help establish the criteria for evaluating the metastasis risk and prognosis of patients with tongue cancers.

Elective neck dissection (END) is recommended for the management of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) because of the risk of occult metastasis (OM). We hypothesized that some factors predict poor prognosis regardless of a cN0 END. This study aimed to investigate the predictors of OM and prognostic factors in patients with cN0 OSCC who underwent supraomohyoid neck dissection (SOHND). A retrospective cohort study design was created and implemented. The primary predictive variables in this study were OM and risk factors for poor prognosis after SOHND. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to adjust for the effects of potential confounders on the risk factors for poor prognoses. Among 86 patients with OSCC, OMs were observed in 9 (10.5%). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and vascular invasion are good markers for detecting OM. A Cox multivariable analysis identified two independent predictors of overall survival: pathologic node (pN) and laterality of END. An independent predictive factor for disease-free survival, the surgical margin, was also identified in this study. According to the pN classification, pN1 patients had a worse survival rate than pN2 patients. Therefore, in the case of pN1, regardless of being cN0, additional adjuvant therapy may be necessary.

The neck control strategies of early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with clinical node-negative neck remain uncertain. These patients could be benefit from elective neck dissection (END) alongside primary tumor excision; but current evidence on END versus observation for OSCC of stage I only is not yet analyzed collectively in detail. Herein, this short communication aimed to evaluate the neck control strategies of stage I OSCC, mainly END versus observation. A total of 740 patients with stage I OSCC, comprising 434 underwent END and 306 received observation, were identified from literature. The results showed that stage I OSCC patients would not be benefit from END based on the analysis of neck nodal recurrence and overall survival. An ideal strategy would likely be to avoid neck dissection for stage I OSCC patients with N0 neck. Immune checkpoint therapy is such a potential strategy, which aims at eliciting potent antitumor immune responses within lymph nodes hold promise for treating patients with early-stage OSCC and may prove more efficacious than lymphadenectomy in a variety of scenarios. Consequently, neck dissection for stage I OSCC could be approached with caution, particularly in patients receiving immune checkpoint therapy.

The neck management of clinical-nodal negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains controversial. Elective neck dissection (END) and observation are the main strategies, but it is still not clear who could benefit the most from END. The purpose of this study was to clarify the potential clinical factors that affect the therapeutic value of END and to explore the actual characteristics associated with benefit from END.
Patients with cN0 OSCC were identified in the SEER database from 2000 to 2019. 5-year Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan‒Meier method, and the hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were estimated using the Cox regression model. Multiple subgroup analyses of DSS and OS among different factors, comparing END and No END, were performed.
A total of 17,019 patients with cN0 OSCC were included. The basic survival analysis and Cox regression model showed that END increased the probability of 5-year DSS and OS and was an independent prognostic factor. However, among patients who underwent only primary tumor surgery, no significant differences were found between the END and No END groups in 5-year DSS (P = 0. 585) and OS (P = 0.465). Further subgroup analysis showed that primary sites and T stage, but not other factors, might influence the benefit of END. Significant differences were found for T1 (P < 0.001 for OS) and T2 (P = 0.001 for DSS and < 0.001 for OS) tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) but not for other primary tumor sites.
This large-scale retrospective population-based cohort study suggests that not all patients with cN0 OSCC could benefit from END. Patients with cN0 TSCC are recommended to undergo END, especially with early-stage tumors.

BACKGROUND: The current NCCN guidelines recommend considering elective neck dissection (END) for early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with a depth of invasion (DOI) exceeding 3 mm. However, this DOI threshold, determined by evaluating the occult lymph node metastatic rate, lacks robust supporting evidence regarding its impact on patient outcomes. In this nationwide study, we sought to explore the specific indications for END in patients diagnosed with OCSCC at stage cT2N0M0, as defined by the AJCC Eighth Edition staging criteria.
METHODS: We examined 4723 patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, of which 3744 underwent END and 979 were monitored through neck observation (NO).
RESULTS: Patients who underwent END had better 5-year outcomes compared to those in the NO group. The END group had higher rates of neck control (95% vs. 84%, p < 0.0001), disease-specific survival (DSS; 87% vs. 84%, p = 0.0259), and overall survival (OS; 79% vs. 73%, p = 0.0002). Multivariable analysis identified NO, DOI ≥5.0 mm, and moderate-to-poor tumor differentiation as independent risk factors for 5-year neck control, DSS, and OS. Based on these prognostic variables, three distinct outcome subgroups were identified within the NO group. These included a low-risk subgroup (DOI <5 mm plus well-differentiated tumor), an intermediate-risk subgroup (DOI ≥5.0 mm or moderately differentiated tumor), and a high-risk subgroup (poorly differentiated tumor or DOI ≥5.0 mm plus moderately differentiated tumor). Notably, the 5-year survival outcomes (neck control/DSS/OS) for the low-risk subgroup within the NO group (97%/95%/85%, n = 251) were not inferior to those of the END group (95%/87%/79%).
CONCLUSIONS: By implementing risk stratification within the NO group, we found that 26% (251/979) of low-risk patients achieved outcomes similar to those in the END group. Therefore, when making decisions regarding the implementation of END in patients with cT2N0M0 OCSCC, factors such as DOI and tumor differentiation should be taken into account.

OBJECTIVE: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC), a tumor with a significantly increasing incidence, is mostly diagnosed in the head region, where tumors have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of metastases. The presence of metastases reduces specific five-year survival from 99% to 50%. As the risk of occult metastases does not exceed 10%, elective dissection of the tributary parotid and neck lymph nodes is not recommended.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a group of 12 patients with cSCC of the head after elective dissections of regional (parotid and cervical) nodes by means of superficial parotidectomy and selective neck dissection.
RESULTS: We diagnosed occult metastases neither in the cervical nor parotid nodes in any patient. None were diagnosed as a regional recurrence during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our negative opinion on elective parotidectomy and neck dissection in cSCC of the head is in agreement with the majority of published studies. These elective procedures are not indicated even for tumors showing the presence of known (clinical and histological) risk factors for lymphogenic spread, as their positive predictive value is too low. Elective parotidectomy is individually considered as safe deep surgical margin. If elective parotidectomy is planned it should include only the superficial lobe. Completion parotidectomy and elective neck dissection are done in rare cases of histologically confirmed parotid metastasis in the parotid specimen. Preoperatively diagnosed parotid metastases without neck involvement are sent for total parotidectomy and elective selective neck dissection. Cases of clinically evident neck metastasis with no parotid involvement, are referred for comprehensive neck dissection and elective superficial parotidectomy. The treatment of concurrent parotid and cervical metastases includes total conservative parotidectomy and comprehensive neck dissection.
METHODS: How common is the problem? Step 4 (Case-series) Is this diagnostic or monitoring test accurate? (Diagnosis) Step 4 (poor or non-independent reference standard) What will happen if we do not add a therapy? (Prognosis) Step 4 (Case-series) Does this intervention help? (Treatment Benefits) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the COMMON harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) What are the RARE harms? (Treatment Harms) Step 4 (Case-series) Is this (early detection) test worthwhile? (Screening) Step 4 (Case-series).

The aim of the study was to find clinical and pathological factors with the greatest prognostic significance in patients with OSCC. The analysis included 125 patients grouped according to the tumor primary site (TPS): the floor of the mouth (FOM), tongue (TC) and retromolar triangle (RMT). Grading (G), tumor size (pT), nodal metastases (NM), local recurrence (LR), nodal recurrence (NR), perineural invasion (PNI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), extranodal extension (pENE), and nodal yield (NY) were evaluated in each group.
UNASSIGNED: With regard to TPS, FOM appeared to be the most metastatic. However, the recurrence rate was similar to TC tumors, which were characterized by higher G than those in other locations. When analyzing G, the highest percentage of LR (40.5%) and NM (34.5%) was observed among patients with G2. As G increased, so did the number of pENE G1 - 7.4%; G2 - 31%; G3 - 35.7%; LVI: G1 - 25.9%; G2 - 50%; G3 - 57.1%; PNI: G1 - 29.6%; G2 - 47.6%; G3 - 92.9%; NR G1 - 14.8%; G2 - 32.1%; G3 - 21.4%. Grading did not affect the type of growth and did not directly affect the occurrence of NR. pT and DOI increased the frequency of NM but we did not observe any effect of pT and DOI on LR, PNI, and LVI. NY in the study group did not increase the risk of NR.
UNASSIGNED: Tumor primary sites within the FOM, TC, and pT classification are the factors that increase the risk of NM and LR. However, apart from the primary site predisposing to the occurrence of NM, the histological structure of the tumor turned out to be the most important feature affecting the patient\'s prognosis. The number of cases of pENE+, LVI+, PNI+, NM+, and NR+ increased with the increase in G. Although the pT, DOI increased the frequency of NM, we did not observe the effect of the pT and DOI on LR, PNI and LVI. Thus, even in the case of a small tumor of the FOM and TC with at least G2, elective neck dissection should be performed each time.