duration of treatment

治疗持续时间
  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    肺炎链球菌是与血流感染相关的常见病原体,呼吸道感染,腹膜炎,感染性心内膜炎,和脑膜炎。评估常见感染继发肺炎链球菌菌血症的抗生素治疗持续时间的文献很少。导致实践中的可变性。因此,这项研究评估了短期(5-10天)和长期(11-16天)抗生素治疗肺炎链球菌菌血症的有效性.
    这次回顾展,单中心队列研究评估了肺炎链球菌阳性血培养的住院患者,他们在首次阳性血培养采集48小时内接受活性抗生素,并在首次阳性血培养采集第10天达到临床稳定性。排除标准包括治疗持续时间<5或>16天,在完成10天治疗前死亡,多微生物血流感染,和侵袭性感染。临床失败率(30天住院再入院的综合,菌血症复发,和死亡率)进行了组间比较。
    共纳入162名患者,短期组51例,长期组111例。在90.1%的患者中,肺炎是菌血症的可疑来源。两组之间的临床失败率没有显着差异。短组患者接受抗生素治疗的中位疗程为7天,长组患者接受抗生素治疗的中位疗程为14天;然而,中位住院时间没有观察到显著差异,重症监护病房住院时间中位数,或艰难梭菌感染率。
    对于社区获得性肺炎继发肺炎链球菌菌血症患者,缩短抗生素疗程可能是合适的。
    UNASSIGNED: Streptococcus pneumoniae is a common pathogen associated with bloodstream infections, respiratory infections, peritonitis, infective endocarditis, and meningitis. Literature assessing duration of antibiotic therapy for a S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to common infection is scarce, leading to variability in practice. Therefore, this study evaluated the effectiveness of short (5-10 days) versus long (11-16 days) antibiotic durations for S pneumoniae bacteremia.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, single-center cohort study assessed hospitalized patients with S pneumoniae-positive blood cultures, who received active antibiotics within 48 hours of first positive blood culture collection and achieved clinical stability by day 10 of the first positive blood culture collection. Exclusion criteria included treatment duration <5 or >16 days, death before completion of 10 days of therapy, polymicrobial bloodstream infection, and invasive infection. Rates of clinical failure (composite of 30-day hospital readmission, bacteremia recurrence, and mortality) were compared between the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 162 patients were included, with 51 patients in the short- and 111 patients in the long-duration group. Pneumonia was the suspected source of bacteremia in 90.1% of patients. Rates of clinical failure were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Patients received a median antibiotic course of 7 days in the short group compared to 14 days in the long group; however, there was no significant difference observed in the median hospital length of stay, median intensive care unit length of stay, or rate of Clostridioides difficile infection.
    UNASSIGNED: Shorter antibiotic courses may be appropriate in patients with S pneumoniae bacteremia secondary to community-acquired pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿替珠单抗加贝伐单抗(Atez/BV)作为一线治疗和乐伐替尼(LEN)作为二线治疗是不可切除的肝细胞癌患者的推荐治疗方法。由免疫检查点抑制剂(如Atez)引起的不良免疫事件通常仅在给药后几个月发生;因此,一线治疗对二线治疗的潜在影响尚不清楚.本研究通过比较不可切除的肝癌一线Atez/BV治疗后第二LEN的不良事件(AE),调查了第二LEN治疗(第二LEN)的安全性。与那些一线LEN治疗(第一LEN)。接受Atez/BV作为一线治疗和第二次LEN的患者,或在大崎市立医院接受第一LEN的人(大崎,日本)在2018年4月至2023年9月期间对治疗持续时间和AE进行了回顾性评估。第1组LEN(n=39)和第2组LEN(n=13)患者的中位治疗时间为151.0天[95%置信区间(CI)77-303天]和128.5天(95%CI68-270天),分别为(P=0.385)。与第一LEN组(46.2%)相比,第二LEN组(76.9%)的患者比例更高(P=0.016)。甲状腺功能减退症在接受第2次LEN(46.2%)的患者中比第1次LEN(12.8%)更常见(P=0.016)。此外,在接受第2次LEN的患者中观察到1级(3例)和2级(3例)甲状腺功能减退.对于这六个病人来说,在一线Atez/BV治疗期间,4例患者有0级甲状腺功能减退,2例患者有1级甲状腺功能减退(P=0.025).总之,在接受Atez/BV治疗后接受第2次LEN的患者发生甲状腺功能减退症的风险增加.
    Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/BV) as first-line therapy and lenvatinib (LEN) as second-line therapy are the recommended treatments for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Adverse immune events caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (such as Atez) generally only occur several months after administration; therefore, the potential influence of the first-line treatment on second-line treatment is not clear. The present study investigated the safety of second-line LEN treatment (2nd LEN) by comparing the adverse events (AEs) of 2nd LEN after first-line Atez/BV treatment for unresectable liver cancer, with those of first-line LEN treatment (1st LEN). Patients who received Atez/BV as first-line therapy and 2nd LEN, or those who received 1st LEN at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and September 2023 were retrospectively evaluated for treatment duration and AEs. The median treatment duration for patients in the 1st LEN (n=39) and 2nd LEN (n=13) groups was 151.0 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 77-303 days] and 128.5 days (95% CI 68-270 days), respectively (P=0.385). A greater proportion of patients showed elevated aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase levels in the 2nd LEN group (76.9%) compared with those in the 1st LEN group (46.2%) (P=0.016). Hypothyroidism was more common in those receiving 2nd LEN (46.2%) than 1st LEN (12.8%) (P=0.016). In addition, grade 1 (three patients) and grade 2 (three patients) hypothyroidism was observed in patients receiving 2nd LEN. For these six patients, during first-line Atez/BV treatment, four patients had grade 0 hypothyroidism and two patients had grade 1 hypothyroidism (P=0.025). In conclusion, patients receiving 2nd LEN after treatment with Atez/BV are at an increased risk of hypothyroidism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了评估有效性,安全,以及从基于硼替佐米的静脉诱导到基于艾沙佐米的口服方案的课堂过渡(iCT)的便利性。
    方法:这项回顾性研究于2017年10月至2023年4月在16家中国医院进行,分析了新诊断(NDMM)和一线复发多发性骨髓瘤(FRMM)患者,这些患者至少从硼替佐米诱导治疗中获得了部分反应。然后是以ixazomib为基础的口服方案2年或直到疾病进展或无法耐受的毒性。
    结果:该研究招募了199名患者,中位年龄:63岁,男性55.4%,53%为高风险(HR),47%为标准风险。通过中期荧光原位杂交(M-FISH)进行细胞遗传学风险分层,基于梅奥诊所风险分层系统。总PI治疗的中位持续时间为11个月,以艾沙佐米为基础的治疗持续6个月。在20个月的中位随访中,53%的患者仍在接受治疗。从基于硼替佐米的诱导开始,24个月的PFS率为84.3%,从基于艾沙唑米的治疗开始为83.4%。硼替佐米诱导后的总反应率(ORR)为100%,基于伊沙佐米的方案6个周期后为90%。根据桑基图,89.51%的患者在2个周期的iCT后维持或改善了他们的疾病反应,6个周期(90.14%),和12个周期(80%)。发现Mayo的HR水平是缓解不良的重要独立因素(风险比(HR)2.55;p=0.033)。Ixazomib的安全性与以前的临床试验数据一致,49%的患者经历至少一个任何级别的AE。最常见的不良事件包括周围神经病变,恶心和呕吐,腹泻,血小板减少症,和粒细胞减少症.
    结论:在现实世界的中国MM人群中,NDMM和FRMM患者对基于PI的连续治疗反应良好,显示出相当大的反应率。基于ixazomib的iCT允许持续的基于PI的治疗,提供有希望的疗效和可耐受的不良事件。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and convenience of in-class transition (iCT) from intravenous bortezomib-based induction to ixazomib-based oral regimens.
    METHODS: This retrospective real-world study was conducted in 16 Chinese hospitals between October 2017 and April 2023 and analyzed newly diagnosed (NDMM) and first-line relapsed multiple myeloma (FRMM) patients who attained at least a partial response from bortezomib-based induction therapy, followed by an ixazomib-based oral regimen for 2 year or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
    RESULTS: The study enrolled 199 patients, median age: 63 years old, male 55.4%, 53% as high risk (HR), and 47% as standard risk. Cytogenetic risk stratification by metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), based on the Mayo Clinic risk stratification system. The median duration of total PI therapy was 11 months, with ixazomib-based treatment spanning 6 months. At the 20-month median follow-up, 53% of patients remained on therapy. The 24-month PFS rate was 84.3% from the initiation of bortezomib-based induction and 83.4% from the start of ixazomib-based treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% post-bortezomib induction and 90% following 6 cycles of the ixazomib-based regimen. Based on the Sankey diagrams, 89.51% of patients maintained or improved their disease response after 2 cycles of iCT, 6 cycles (90.14%), and 12 cycles (80%). The HR level of Mayo was found to be a significant independent factor in a worse remission (hazard ratio (HR) 2.55; p = 0.033). Ixazomib\'s safety profile aligned with previous clinical trial data, with 49% of patients experiencing at least one AE of any grade. The most common AEs included peripheral neuropathy, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world Chinese MM population, NDMM and FRMM patients responded favorably to PI-based continuous therapy, demonstrating substantial response rates. The ixazomib-based iCT allows for sustained PI-based treatment, offering promising efficacy and tolerable AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:近年来,老年营养风险指数(GNRI)被报道为许多癌症患者的预后预测指标.这项研究调查了术前GNRI与不良事件的发生以及卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(CAPOX)治疗持续时间的关系。术后辅助化疗,在2019年9月至2022年4月的59例结直肠癌患者中。
    方法:使用100.9的临界值将患者分为高和低GNRI组。
    结果:≥2级白细胞减少症的发生率(p=0.03),在低GNRI组,所有级别的周围神经病变(p=0.04)明显更常见.通过单变量和多变量Cox回归比例风险模型对影响治疗持续时间的因素进行分析显示,GNRI存在显着差异(p=0.0097)。
    结论:GNRI,在治疗开始前评估的营养指标,影响不良事件的发生和CAPOX辅助化疗治疗的持续时间。为了完成CAPOX治疗,术前,使用GNRI评估患者的营养状况并积极干预营养治疗非常重要.
    OBJECTIVE: In recent years, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been reported as a predictor of prognosis in many patients with cancer. This study investigated the association of preoperative GNRI with the occurrence of adverse events and duration of treatment with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX), a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, in 59 patients with colorectal cancer from September 2019 to April 2022.
    METHODS: A cut-off value of 100.9 was used to categorize patients into high and low GNRI groups.
    RESULTS: The incidence of grade ≥2 leukopenia (p=0.03), and all grades peripheral neuropathy (p=0.04) were significantly more frequent in the low GNRI group. Analysis of factors influencing treatment duration by univariate and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazards models showed a significant difference in GNRI (p=0.0097).
    CONCLUSIONS: GNRI, a nutritional indicator assessed before the start of treatment, influences the occurrence of adverse events and duration of treatment with CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy. To complete CAPOX therapy, preoperatively, it is important to assess the patients\' nutritional status using the GNRI and to actively intervene in nutritional therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目的是分析芬兰公共卫生保健部门下颌前移正畸手术治疗的费用和持续时间。
    方法:该研究是在公立地区医院进行的一项回顾性注册研究,研究对象为所有非综合征患者,这些患者为芬兰人,在2016-2020年接受全固定矫治器和下颌前移手术治疗。
    结果:纳入的45例患者的平均治疗时间为28.1个月,包括术前18.9个月和术后9.2个月。访问的中位数为27次,包括手术前的17次访问和手术后的9次访问。平均总治疗时间为14.5h。每个疗程的平均总直接费用为7574€,患者为947€。费用与治疗时间呈正相关(rho=0.71,P=.000),但与患者的性别或年龄无关。平均手术时间是78分钟,而有经验的外科医生明显较少(P=0.002)。据计算,平均最低治疗费用将是目前总额的45%,在治疗开始时具有最佳牙弓的患者可实现。
    结论:研究的主要限制是研究对象数量相对较少。
    结论:55%的成本份额受案例和运营商依赖因素的影响。这表明正畸治疗阶段的复杂性和性能是成本结构的重要决定因素。
    The aim was to analyse the costs and duration of orthodontic-surgical treatment with mandibular advancement in the public health care sector in Finland.
    The study was conducted as a retrospective registry study in a public district hospital on all nonsyndromic patients that were ethnic Finns and treated with full fixed appliances and mandibular advancement surgery in 2016-2020.
    The mean treatment duration of the included 45 patients was 28.1 months, including 18.9 months pre and 9.2 months postoperative orthodontics. The median number of visits was 27, including 17 visits before and 9 visits after surgery. The mean total treatment time was 14.5 h. The mean total direct costs per course of treatment were 7574 € to the municipality and 947 € to the patient. The costs positively correlated with the duration of the treatment (rho = 0.71, P = .000), but were not associated to gender or age of patient. The mean surgery time was 78 minutes, and significantly less with an experienced surgeon (P = .002). It was calculated that the mean minimum treatment costs would be 45% of the present total, achievable with a patient with optimum dental arches at the start of treatment.
    The major limitation of the study is the relatively small number of study subjects.
    A 55% share of the costs is influenced by case- and operator-dependent factors. This indicates that the complexity and performance of the orthodontic phases of treatment are important determinants in the cost structure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:侵袭性真菌感染(IMF)的分期和活性评估用于调整抗真菌治疗(AT)的类型和持续时间。通常使用基于解剖学的成像。使用18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖的正电子发射断层扫描/CT(18F-FDGPET/CT)不仅可以在一个疗程中评估多个身体区域,但在常规成像技术提供的解剖数据中增加了功能信息,并且可能会改善FI的分期和对治疗反应的监测。我们的目标是分析系统使用18F-FDGPET/CT在FI诊断和治疗管理中的影响。
    方法:在西班牙的14家三级医院中进行的在诊断和随访中进行系统性18F-FDGPET/CT的多中心前瞻性队列研究。计划在2年的研究期间包括224名患有国际金融机构的患者。将比较18F-FDGPET/CT前后的发现和管理变化。此外,将评估初始定量18F-FDGPET/CT参数与治疗反应的相关性.主要终点是比较18F-FDGPET/CT与无18F-FDGPET/CT的标准管理在初始评估(分期)和监测对治疗的反应时的FI的产量。18F-FDGPET/CT检查结果对患者诊断-治疗管理的影响(附加值),以及18F-FDGPET/CT不同定量参数的预后能力将是次要终点。
    背景:PuertadeHierro-Majadahonda大学医院临床研究伦理委员会在主要地点批准了该研究方案。我们计划在高影响力期刊上发布结果。
    背景:NCT05688592。
    The evaluation of staging and activity of invasive fungal infection (IFI) is used to adjust the type and duration of antifungal therapy (AT). Typically anatomy-based imaging is used. Positron emission tomography/CT with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET/CT) not only evaluates more than one body area in one session, but adds functional information to the anatomic data provided by usual imaging techniques and can potentially improve staging of IFI and monitoring of the response to therapy. Our objective is to analyse the impact of the systematic use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in IFI diagnostic and therapeutic management.
    Multicentre prospective cohort study of IFI with performance of systematic 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis and follow-up that will be carried out in 14 Spanish tertiary hospitals. It is planned to include 224 patients with IFI over a 2-year study period. Findings and changes in management before and after 18F-FDG PET/CT will be compared. Additionally, the association of initial quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with response to therapy will be evaluated.The primary endpoint is to compare the yield of 18F-FDG PET/CT with standard management without 18F-FDG PET/CT in IFI at initial assessment (staging) and in monitoring the response to treatment.The impact of the results of 18F-FDG PET/CT on the diagnostic-therapeutic management of patients with IFI (added value), as well as the prognostic ability of different quantification parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT will be secondary endpoints.
    The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital approved the protocol of the study at the primary site. We plan to publish the results in high-impact journals.
    NCT05688592.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:初始干预和后续治疗的治疗持续时间(DOT)是确定抗癌药物预算影响分析(BIA)计算准确性的关键。然而,现有的研究只使用简单的假设作为点的代理,导致高度的偏差。
    目的:为了提高抗癌药物BIA的准确性和可靠性,解决有关DOT的问题,我们提出了一种基于个体患者数据(IPD)的替代方法,该方法从已发表的KaplanMeier生存曲线重建IPD,以估计DOT.
    方法:我们为这种新方法开发了一个四步方法框架,以帕博利珠单抗治疗微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)晚期结直肠癌为例:(1)重建IPD;(2)计算每位患者初始干预和后续治疗的总DOT;(3)分配随机时间和DOT;(4)多重置换采样和平均值的计算.
    结果:使用这种方法,可以计算BIA时间范围内每年初始干预和后续治疗的平均DOT,并将其用于计算每年消耗的资源和成本.在我们的例子中,从第一年到第四年,pembrolizumab初始干预的平均DOT为4.90、6.60、5.24和5.06个月,分别,而后续治疗的平均DOT为0.75、2.84、2.99和2.50个月,分别。
    结论:与常规方法相比,基于IPD的重建方法可以提高抗癌药物BIA的准确性和可靠性,并且可以广泛使用,尤其是对抗癌药物具有优异的疗效。
    BACKGROUND: The duration of treatment (DOT) of the initial intervention and subsequent treatment is the key to determining the accuracy of anticancer-drug budget impact analysis (BIA) calculations. However, existing studies only use simple assumptions as a proxy for DOT, resulting in a high degree of bias.
    OBJECTIVE: To enhance the accuracy and reliability of anticancer-drug BIA and solve the problem regarding DOT, we propose an alternative individual patient data (IPD)-based approach that reconstructs IPD from the published Kaplan Meier survival curves to estimate DOT.
    METHODS: We developed a four-step methodological framework for this new approach, taking the use of pembrolizumab in treating microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) advanced colorectal cancer as an example: (1) reconstructing the IPD; (2) calculating the total DOT of the initial intervention and subsequent treatment for each patient; (3) assigning a randomized time and DOT; and (4) multiple replacement sampling and calculation of the mean value.
    RESULTS: Using this approach, the average DOT for the initial intervention and subsequent treatment in each year of the BIA time horizon can be calculated and used to calculate the resources consumed and costs in each year. In our example, the average DOT for the initial intervention with pembrolizumab from the first to the fourth year was 4.90, 6.60, 5.24, and 5.06 months, respectively, while the average DOT for subsequent treatment was 0.75, 2.84, 2.99, and 2.50 months, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The reconstructed IPD-based approach can improve the accuracy and reliability of anticancer-drug BIA compared with conventional methods, and can be widely used, especially for anticancer drugs with excellent efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伦伐替尼(LEN),多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,是肝细胞癌的标准治疗剂,但由于与LEN治疗相关的不良事件(AE)发生率较高,因此通常需要停止治疗.本研究旨在阐明改良LEN给药方法的疗效和耐受性,例如隔日给药,LEN的AE所必需的。共有66名患者在Ogaki市立医院(Ogaki,日本)在2018年4月至2022年1月期间进行了回顾性评估。将这些患者分为使用标准给药方法(标准LEN,n=48)以及在治疗中期从标准给药方法更改为改良给药方法的人[改良LEN(周末休息/隔天),n=18]。分析LEN治疗的持续时间和停止治疗的原因。改良LEN组(1例)因AEs停药率低于标准LEN组(16例)(P=0.022)。标准LEN患者的中位治疗持续时间(n=48),改良LEN(周末休息,n=6)和修改后的LEN(隔天,n=12)组为71[95%置信区间(CI)55-134],483(95%CI:193-644)和222(95%CI:98-303)天,分别为(P=0.044)。给药方法的修改确保更少的AE相关治疗中断。然而,与标准剂量相比,周末休息给药显示更长的治疗持续时间,而隔日给药显示与标准给药无差异。
    Lenvatinib (LEN), a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a standard therapeutic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma, but the high incidence of adverse events (AEs) related to LEN treatment often necessitates treatment discontinuation. The present study aimed to clarify the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of modified LEN dosing methods, such as alternate-day dosing, necessitated by AEs of LEN. A total of 66 patients who received LEN at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) between April 2018 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were divided into those who completed treatment with the standard administration method (standard LEN, n=48) and those who changed from the standard administration method to a modified administration method in the middle of treatment [modified LEN (weekends off/alternate days), n=18]. The treatment duration and reasons for discontinuation of LEN treatment were analysed. The discontinuation rate due to AEs in the modified LEN group (1 patient) was less compared with that in the standard LEN group (16 patients) (P=0.022). The median treatment duration for patients in the standard LEN (n=48), modified LEN (weekends off, n=6) and modified LEN (alternate days, n=12) groups was 71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 55-134], 483 (95% CI: 193-644) and 222 (95% CI: 98-303) days, respectively (P=0.044). Modification of the administration method ensured fewer AE-related treatment discontinuations. However, weekends off dosing showed a longer treatment duration compared with standard dosing, whereas alternate day dosing showed no difference from standard dosing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:高剂量糖皮质激素与改善原发性自身免疫性垂体炎(PAH)的缺陷恢复有关,但是最佳剂量,路线,和持续时间不清楚。
    UNASSIGNED:我们回顾了2021年12月前PAH一线糖皮质激素治疗的文献,并进行了个体患者数据荟萃分析,以分析临床,荷尔蒙,以及关于路线的放射学结果,剂量,根据疾病严重程度,糖皮质激素治疗的持续时间(<6.5vs6.5-12vs>12周)。
    UNASSIGNED:共纳入了83篇出版物中的153例PAH患者。出现时的中位年龄为41(32.5-48)岁,女性占优势(70.3%)。与口服(54.5%)途径相比,静脉内(91.7%)的视野恢复明显更好,与中剂量(20%)的糖皮质激素相比,高剂量(100%)和非常高的剂量(90.9%)。静脉内皮质营养轴恢复更大(54.8%vs28.1%口服,P=0.033)途径和增加糖皮质激素剂量组(0%vs38.1%vs57.1%),在极高剂量下达到统计学意义(P=0.012)。更长的治疗时间(>6.5周)与更好的促肾上腺皮质激素和促甲状腺激素恢复相关。静脉内途径对抢救治疗的需求较低(38%vs17.5%,P=0.012),并且随着糖皮质激素剂量的增加(53.3%vs34.3%vs17.3%,P=0.016)。在严重疾病中,静脉内途径和极高剂量类固醇的视野和促肾上腺皮质营养轴恢复明显更高。糖皮质激素的不良反应与治疗剂量和持续时间无关。
    UNASSIGNED:通过静脉途径和累积较长持续时间(>6.5周)的极高剂量糖皮质激素可导致更好的结果,可被视为严重PAH病例的一线治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: High-dose glucocorticoids are associated with improved recovery of deficits in primary autoimmune hypophysitis (PAH), but optimal dosing, route, and duration are unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: We reviewed literature for first-line glucocorticoid treatment in PAH until December 2021 and performed an individual patient data meta-analysis to analyze clinical, hormonal, and radiological outcomes with respect to route, dose, and duration (<6.5 vs 6.5-12 vs >12 weeks) of glucocorticoid treatment according to disease severity.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 153 PAH patients from 83 publications were included. The median age at presentation was 41 (32.5-48) years with a female preponderance (70.3%). Visual field recovery was significantly better with i.v. (91.7%) as compared to oral (54.5%) route and high dose (100%) and very high dose (90.9%) as compared to medium dose (20%) of glucocorticoids. Corticotroph axis recovery was greater in i.v. (54.8% vs 28.1% oral, P = 0.033) route and increasing glucocorticoid dose group (0% vs 38.1% vs 57.1%), attaining statistical significance (P = 0.012) with very high-dose. A longer duration of treatment (>6.5 weeks) was associated with better corticotroph and thyrotroph recovery. The need for rescue therapy was lower with i.v. route (38% vs 17.5%, P = 0.012) and with increasing glucocorticoid doses (53.3% vs 34.3% vs 17.3%, P = 0.016). In severe disease, visual field and corticotroph axis recovery were significantly higher with i.v. route and very high-dose steroids. The adverse effects of glucocorticoids were independent of dose and duration of treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Very high-dose glucocorticoids by i.v. route and cumulative longer duration (>6.5 weeks) lead to better outcomes and could be considered as first-line treatment of severe PAH cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术已经使用不同的技术来减少功能性治疗时间,包括低水平激光治疗(LLLT)。大多数研究都是在动物身上进行的。因此,本研究的目的是评估LLLT对使用Twin-Block(TB)矫治器改善正畸功能治疗的效果.材料和方法这项研究是一个三臂,平行组随机对照试验。使用以下纳入标准选择患者:由下颌后颌引起的骨骼II类1类错牙合(前颅基部与NB平面之间的角度(即,SNB角度):73°-78°),矢状骨骼差异角(ANB角)在4°和9°之间,和5和9毫米之间的超喷。48例患者随机分为3组。在LLLT-TB组中,除了使用Twin-Block矫正器进行功能治疗外,还使用了波长为808nm、功率为250mW的低水平激光设备.激光应用于双侧颞下颌关节(TMJ)区域的皮肤,在五点,每个点接收5J的激光20秒。第一个月,激光课程每周两次,第二个月每两周,治疗结束前每三周一次.第二组(结核病组)接受了Twin-Block矫治器的功能治疗,而第三组(未经治疗的对照组(UCG))的患者在没有任何干预的情况下观察了9个月。结果LLLT-TB组与TB组治疗周期(129天、235天,分别,P值<0.001)。与TB和UCG组相比,LLLT-TB组的有效下颌长度(Co-Gn)的变化最高(4.41mm,3.66mm,和1.07毫米,分别;P值<0.001)。结论在髁突区域应用低水平激光治疗可使II类骨骼错牙合患者的功能治疗加速约45%,并增加骨骼生长和下颌骨长度。在两个介入组中,SNB角度的改善相似。低水平激光的照射会刺激髁突的骨骼生长,并且在功能性矫形矫正后不会引起颞下颌关节的前移。
    Background Different techniques have been used to reduce functional treatment time including low-level laser therapy (LLLT), and the majority of studies have been conducted on animals. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects of LLLT on improving orthodontic functional treatment using the Twin-Block (TB) appliance. Materials and methods This study was a three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Patients were selected using the following inclusion criteria: skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulting from mandibular retrognathia (angle between the anterior cranial base and the NB plane (i.e., SNB angle): 73°-78°), the sagittal skeletal discrepancy angle (ANB angle) between 4° and 9°, and overjet between 5 and 9 mm. Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated into three equal groups. In the LLLT-TB group, the low-level laser device was used with a wavelength of 808 nm and power of 250 mW in addition to functional treatment with a Twin-Block appliance. The laser was applied on the skin at the bilateral temporomandibular joint (TMJ) regions, at five points, each point received 5 J of the laser for 20 seconds. The laser course was twice a week in the first month, every two weeks in the second month, and every three weeks up to the end of the treatment. The second group (the TB group) received functional treatment with a Twin-Block appliance, while patients in the third group (the untreated control group (UCG)) were observed for nine months without any intervention. Results There were statistically significant differences in treatment periods between the LLLT-TB group and the TB group (129 days and 235 days, respectively, P-value<0.001). The change in the effective mandibular length (Co-Gn) was the highest in the LLLT-TB group compared with the TB and the UCG groups (4.41 mm, 3.66 mm, and 1.07 mm, respectively; P-value<0.001). Conclusions The application of low-level laser therapy on the condylar regions accelerated the functional treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion patients by approximately 45% and increased the bone growth and mandibular length. The improvement in the SNB angle was similar in both interventional groups. Irradiation of low-level laser stimulated bone growth at the condyles and did not cause anterior movement of the temporomandibular joint following functional orthopedic correction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号