UNASSIGNED: Postoperative pain is a common occurrence in pediatric patients following craniotomy, often leading to negative outcomes. Intravenous dexmedetomidine and lidocaine are commonly used adjuvant medicines in general anesthesia to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and relieve postoperative pain in adults. While they show promise for use in pediatrics, the evidence of their application in pediatric craniotomy patients is limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and lidocaine on postoperative pain in pediatric patients following craniotomy.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, single-center trial on children scheduled for craniotomy. The 255 recruited participants aged 1-12 years were randomly assigned to intraoperatively receive a loading intravenous dose of either dexmedetomidine 1 μg·kg-1 or lidocaine 2 mg·kg-1 or normal saline for 15 min followed by dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 or lidocaine 1 mg·kg-1·h-1 or normal saline until the sutures of endocranium were completed. The primary outcome was the cumulative sufentanil consumption within 24 h post-surgery.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 241 patients were included in the statistical analysis. The primary outcome did not show any significant differences among the three groups (median (IQR) lidocaine group: 3.36 (1.32-5.64) μg vs. dexmedetomidine group: 3.12 (1.36-6.39) μg vs. control group 3.46 (1.77-7.62) μg, p = 0.485). Among the secondary outcomes, there was a statistically significant but small reduction in sufentanil consumption within 2 h, postoperative FLACC/WBFS/NRS pain scores within 4 h after surgery and postoperative Ramsay sedation scores in dexmedetomidine group (p < 0.05). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of electrolyte disturbance within 24 and 48 h after surgery was significantly higher in control group compared to the other two groups. There were no significant differences in intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative frequency of remedy medication, or length of hospitalization among the three groups. No adverse events related to lidocaine or dexmedetomidine were observed.
UNASSIGNED: There were no significant differences in the primary outcome among the three groups. Although dexmedetomidine showed some benefits in reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the first 2 h and pain intensity within the first 4 h post-surgery, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further research is required to comprehensively assess the outcomes and determine the optimal administration strategy.
UNASSIGNED: [http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx], identifier [ChiCTR1800019411].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the protective effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) against erastin-induced ferroptosis in human renal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2 cells) and explore the underlying mechanism.
METHODS: HK-2 cells were treated with erastin alone or in combination with different concentrations (2.5, 5.0 and 10 μmol/L) of DEX, and the changes in cell viability were observed using CCK-8 assay. To explore the mechanism by which DEX inhibits erastin-induced ferroptosis, HK-2 cells were treated with erastin, erastin+10 μmol/L DEX, or erastin+10 μmol/L DEX+ML385 (a Nrf2 inhibitor), after which the cell viability was assessed. The level of intracellular Fe2+ was detected by cell ferrous iron colorimetric assay kit, and flow cytometry was performed to detect reactive oxygen species (ROS); MDA and reduced glutathione assay kits were used to detect the contents of MDA and GSH in the cells; The expressions of Nrf2, HO-1 and GPX4 proteins were detected by Western blotting.
RESULTS: Erastin treatment significantly inhibited the viability of the cells, decreased GSH content, and increased intracellular levels of Fe2+, ROS and MDA. The combined treatment with 10 μmol/L DEX markedly increased the viability of the cells, increased GSH content, reduced the levels of Fe2+, ROS and MDA, and upregulated the protein expressions of Nrf2, HO-1 and GPX4 in the cells. The application of ML385 obviously blocked the protective effect of DEX and caused significant inhibition of the Nrf2/HO-1/GPX4 pathway, decreased the cell viability and GSH content, and increased the levels of Fe2+, ROS and MDA in HK-2 cells.
CONCLUSIONS: The protective effect of DEX against erastin-induced ferroptosis of HK-2 cells is probably mediated by activation of the Nrf2/HO-1/GPX4 pathway to inhibit oxidative stress.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic-induced immunosuppression is of particular interest in tumor surgery. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the 4 most common general anesthetic techniques on immune function in patients undergoing flap reconstruction for oral cancer.
METHODS: 116 patients were randomly divided into 4 groups. Patients in group S were given sevoflurane-based anesthesia. Group P was administered propofol-based anesthesia. The SD group received sevoflurane combined with dexmedetomidine anesthesia. The propofol combined with dexmedetomidine anesthesia (PD) group received PD. Blood samples were obtained at 5 time points: baseline (T0), 1 hour after the start of the operation (T1), end of the operation (T2), 24 hours (T3), and 48 hours (T4) after the operation. Lymphocyte subsets (including CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and B lymphocytes) and dendritic cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Blood glucose, norepinephrine, and cortisol levels were measured using ELISA and a blood gas analyzer respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 107 patients were included in the final analysis. Immunological indicators, except CD8+ counts, were all decreased in groups S, P, and SD at T1-4 compared with the baseline value, and the counts of CD3+, CD4+, and dendritic cells, as well as CD4+/CD8+ ratios, were significantly higher in the PD group than in the S, P, and SD at T1-3 (P < .05). There were no significant differences between groups P and SD at any observation time point. Intraoperative stress indices, including norepinephrine and cortisol levels, were significantly lower in the PD group than in the other 3 groups at T1-2 (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PD as a probably optimal choice can alleviate immunosuppression in patients undergoing flap reconstruction for oral cancer.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to investigate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil on postoperative analgesia in developmental hip dislocation in children after Salter osteotomy.
UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 98 children with developmental hip dislocation, who underwent Salter osteotomy in our center between January 2020 and February 2023, were selected. The children were randomly divided into four groups based on the application of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (sufentanil + granisetron ± dexmedetomidine). All children received 1 µg/kg/day of sufentanil and 3 mg of granisetron. Group A did not receive dexmedetomidine, and Groups B, C, and D received 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine, respectively. The pain indicators and immune factor levels of children in each group were compared.
UNASSIGNED: The heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) 2 h after operation in Groups C and D were significantly lower than those in Groups A and B (P < 0.05). The pain scores decreased over time after treatment in all groups. When compared at the same time point, children in Group D had the lowest pain scores, which were significantly lower than the other three groups (P < 0.05). The total consumption of sufentanil in Groups C and D was significantly lower than that in Group A (P < 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the children in Group D had lower levels of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and corticosterone than those in Group A (P < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Administration of 1.0 µg/kg/day of dexmedetomidine combined with sufentanil in intravenous controlled analgesia after Salter osteotomy for developmental hip dislocation in children has a better analgesic effect, less consumption of sufentanil, and low incidence of opioid adverse reactions.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on hypotension-induced neuronal damage in a chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH) model of rats, an established model of cerebral white matter lesions (WML) in humans, which is prevalent in the elderly and closely related to cognitive decline. Methods The CCH model rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: normotension + no DEX (NN) group (n = 6), normotension + DEX (ND) group (n = 6), hypotension + no DEX (HN) group (n = 6), or hypotension + DEX (HD) group (n = 6). Under isoflurane anesthesia, mean arterial blood pressure was maintained at or above 80 mmHg (normotension) or below 60 mmHg (hypotension) for a duration of two hours. The DEX groups received 50 μg of DEX intraperitoneally. Two weeks later, the Y-maze test and, after preparing brain slices, immunohistochemical staining were performed using antibodies against neuronal nuclei (NeuN), microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1). Results Behavioral observations showed no significant differences among the groups. Significant reductions of both NeuN-positive cells and the MAP2-positive area were found in the hippocampal CA1 in the HN group compared with NN and ND groups, but not in the HD group. GFAP and Iba-1-positive areas were significantly increased in the HN group, but not in the HD group. Conclusion DEX significantly ameliorated hypotension-induced neuronal damage and both astroglial and microglial activation in the CA1 region of CCH rats.

Hangman\'s fracture is a kind of unstable cervical spine injury which should be treated promptly to avoid life threatening consequences. Advanced neurological monitoring is essential during surgical intrervention. Resource limited setting, where advanced monitors like SSEP and MEP are not available makes it challenging to assess proper reduction of cervical spine without neurological compromise. Dexmedetomidine proved to be very useful drug to assess the neurological status intra operatively by awake sedation.

BACKGROUND: Use of sedatives and analgesics is associated with the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine reduces the occurrence of delirium but may cause hypotension, bradycardia, and insufficient sedation. This substudy aims to determine whether the combination of esketamine with dexmedetomidine can reduce the side effects and risk of delirium than dexmedetomidine alone in mechanically ventilated patients.
METHODS: This single-center, randomized, active-controlled, superiority trial will be conducted at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. A total of 134 mechanically ventilated patients will be recruited and randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine alone or esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine, until extubation or for a maximum of 14 days. The primary outcome is the occurrence of delirium, while the second outcomes include the number of delirium-free days; subtype, severity, and duration of delirium; time to first onset of delirium; total dose of vasopressors and antipsychotics; duration of mechanical ventilation; ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS); accidental extubation, re-intubation, re-admission; and mortality in the ICU at 14 and 28 days.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an urgent need for a new combination regimen of dexmedetomidine due to its evident side effects. The combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine has been applied throughout the perioperative period. However, there is still a lack of evidence on the effects of this regimen on delirium in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. This substudy will evaluate the effects of the combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine in reducing the risk of delirium for mechanically ventilated patients in ICU, thus providing evidence of this combination to improve the short-term prognosis. The study protocol has obtained approval from the Medical Ethics Committee (ID: 2022-SR-450).
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05466708, registered on 20 July 2022.

The potential long-term effects of anesthesia on cognitive development, especially in neonates and infants, have raised concerns. However, our understanding of its underlying mechanisms and effective treatments is still limited. In this study, we found that early exposure to isoflurane (ISO) impaired fear memory retrieval, which was reversed by dexmedetomidine (DEX) pre-treatment. Measurement of c-fos expression revealed that ISO exposure significantly increased neuronal activation in the zona incerta (ZI). Fiber photometry recording showed that ZI neurons from ISO mice displayed enhanced calcium activity during retrieval of fear memory compared to the control group, while DEX treatment reduced this enhanced calcium activity. Chemogenetic inhibition of ZI neurons effectively rescued the impairments caused by ISO exposure. These findings suggest that the ZI may play a pivotal role in mediating the cognitive effects of anesthetics, offering a potential therapeutic target for preventing anesthesia-related cognitive impairments.

BACKGROUND: Sedatives are commonly used to promote sleep in intensive care unit patients. However, it is not clear whether sedation-induced states are similar to the biological sleep. We explored if sedative-induced states resemble biological sleep using multichannel electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings.
METHODS: Multichannel EEG datasets from two different sources were used in this study: (1) sedation dataset consisting of 102 healthy volunteers receiving propofol (N = 36), sevoflurane (N = 36), or dexmedetomidine (N = 30), and (2) publicly available sleep EEG dataset (N = 994). Forty-four quantitative time, frequency and entropy features were extracted from EEG recordings and were used to train the machine learning algorithms on sleep dataset to predict sleep stages in the sedation dataset. The predicted sleep states were then compared with the Modified Observer\'s Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation (MOAA/S) scores.
RESULTS: The performance of the model was poor (AUC = 0.55-0.58) in differentiating sleep stages during propofol and sevoflurane sedation. In the case of dexmedetomidine, the AUC of the model increased in a sedation-dependent manner with NREM stages 2 and 3 highly correlating with deep sedation state reaching an AUC of 0.80.
CONCLUSIONS: We addressed an important clinical question to identify biological sleep promoting sedatives using EEG signals. We demonstrate that propofol and sevoflurane do not promote EEG patterns resembling natural sleep while dexmedetomidine promotes states resembling NREM stages 2 and 3 sleep, based on current sleep staging standards.

Awake craniotomy (AC) is sometimes aborted due to poor arousal and restlessness. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has sedative, analgesic, and anesthetic-sparing effects, with a low risk of respiratory depression, making it effective for intraoperative pain and agitation during the awake phase. We report a case in which AC was successfully performed in combination with low-dose continuous administration of DEX during reoperation in a patient who experienced poor arousal and restlessness during their first surgery, leading to the abandonment of AC. The patient is a 48-year-old male who is scheduled for AC reoperation. Two years ago, the first AC was scheduled and performed under anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. However, AC was abandoned due to poor intraoperative arousal and restlessness. At reoperation, general anesthesia was induced with propofol and continuous administration of remifentanil (0.1 µg/kg/min); following anesthesia induction (continuous infusion of propofol, remifentanil, and a bolus infusion of fentanyl), DEX was also administered (0.2 µg/kg/hour). We performed a scalp nerve block. Before the awake phase, the propofol dose was decreased as was DEX to 0.1 µg/kg/hour, and propofol and remifentanil were discontinued. The patient gradually awoke without any agitation and restlessness 24 min after stopping propofol and remifentanil and could perform language tasks without any complications. In this case, AC was successfully performed in combination with continuous low-dose administration of DEX at the time of reoperation in a patient who experienced poor arousal and restlessness during their first operation and had to discontinue AC.