decision-making

决策
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健正处于一个转折点。我们正在从原始医学转向精准医学,数字医疗系统正在促进这一转变。通过为临床医生提供每位患者的详细信息以及在护理点为决策提供分析支持,数字健康技术正在开启精准医疗的新时代。基因组数据还为临床医生提供了可以提高诊断准确性和及时性的信息,优化处方,和目标风险降低策略,所有这些都是精准医疗的关键要素。然而,基因组数据主要被视为诊断信息,没有被常规地整合到电子病历的临床工作流程中.基因组数据的使用具有精确医学的巨大潜力;然而,由于基因组数据与常规实践中收集的信息根本不同,在数字健康环境中使用此信息需要特别考虑。本文概述了基因组数据与电子记录整合的潜力,以及这些数据如何实现精准医疗。
    Health care is at a turning point. We are shifting from protocolized medicine to precision medicine, and digital health systems are facilitating this shift. By providing clinicians with detailed information for each patient and analytic support for decision-making at the point of care, digital health technologies are enabling a new era of precision medicine. Genomic data also provide clinicians with information that can improve the accuracy and timeliness of diagnosis, optimize prescribing, and target risk reduction strategies, all of which are key elements for precision medicine. However, genomic data are predominantly seen as diagnostic information and are not routinely integrated into the clinical workflows of electronic medical records. The use of genomic data holds significant potential for precision medicine; however, as genomic data are fundamentally different from the information collected during routine practice, special considerations are needed to use this information in a digital health setting. This paper outlines the potential of genomic data integration with electronic records, and how these data can enable precision medicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:股骨颈骨折(FNF)约占全身所有骨折的3.58%,呈现逐年增长的趋势。根据一项调查,1990年,全世界男性和女性的髋部骨折总数分别约为338,000和917,000.在中国,FNFs占髋部骨折的48.22%。目前,已经对FNF患者的出院后死亡率和死亡风险进行了许多研究.然而,目前尚无关于重症监护病房重症FNF患者院内死亡率及其影响因素的确切研究.
    目的:在本文中,采用3种机器学习方法构建重症监护病房患者院内死亡预测模型,以辅助临床医师早期临床决策。
    方法:使用来自重症监护医学信息集市III的FNF患者的信息进行回顾性分析。在使用合成少数过采样技术算法平衡数据集之后,患者随机分为70%的训练集和30%的测试集进行开发和验证,分别,预测模型。随机森林,极端梯度增强,并以医院死亡为结果构建反向传播神经网络预测模型。使用接收器工作特性曲线下的面积评估模型性能,准确度,精度,灵敏度,和特异性。通过与传统logistic模型的对比,验证了模型的预测价值。
    结果:共选择366名FNFs患者,其中48例(13.1%)住院死亡。通过将数据集与院内死亡组和生存组的平衡为1:1来获得来自636名患者的数据。3种机器学习模型表现出很高的预测精度,和随机森林的接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,极端梯度增强,和反向传播神经网络分别为0.98、0.97和0.95,均具有比传统逻辑回归模型更高的预测性能。对特征变量的重要性进行排名,对预测患者院内死亡风险有意义的前10个特征变量是简化急性生理学评分II,乳酸,肌酐,性别,维生素D,钙,肌酸激酶,肌酸激酶同工酶,白细胞,和年龄。
    结论:利用机器学习构建的死亡风险评估模型对预测重症患者院内死亡率具有积极意义,为降低院内死亡率、改善患者预后提供有效依据。
    BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fracture (FNF) accounts for approximately 3.58% of all fractures in the entire body, exhibiting an increasing trend each year. According to a survey, in 1990, the total number of hip fractures in men and women worldwide was approximately 338,000 and 917,000, respectively. In China, FNFs account for 48.22% of hip fractures. Currently, many studies have been conducted on postdischarge mortality and mortality risk in patients with FNF. However, there have been no definitive studies on in-hospital mortality or its influencing factors in patients with severe FNF admitted to the intensive care unit.
    OBJECTIVE: In this paper, 3 machine learning methods were used to construct a nosocomial death prediction model for patients admitted to intensive care units to assist clinicians in early clinical decision-making.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using information of a patient with FNF from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III. After balancing the data set using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique algorithm, patients were randomly separated into a 70% training set and a 30% testing set for the development and validation, respectively, of the prediction model. Random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and backpropagation neural network prediction models were constructed with nosocomial death as the outcome. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The predictive value of the models was verified in comparison to the traditional logistic model.
    RESULTS: A total of 366 patients with FNFs were selected, including 48 cases (13.1%) of in-hospital death. Data from 636 patients were obtained by balancing the data set with the in-hospital death group to survival group as 1:1. The 3 machine learning models exhibited high predictive accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and backpropagation neural network were 0.98, 0.97, and 0.95, respectively, all with higher predictive performance than the traditional logistic regression model. Ranking the importance of the feature variables, the top 10 feature variables that were meaningful for predicting the risk of in-hospital death of patients were the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, lactate, creatinine, gender, vitamin D, calcium, creatine kinase, creatine kinase isoenzyme, white blood cell, and age.
    CONCLUSIONS: Death risk assessment models constructed using machine learning have positive significance for predicting the in-hospital mortality of patients with severe disease and provide a valid basis for reducing in-hospital mortality and improving patient prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产品的基本信息,健康,安全,和营养细节,以及食品营销,广告,和晋升,都在包装的食品标签上提供。这项研究是为了评估知识,态度,以及购物者关于食品标签的做法,因为在印度很少有研究,在浦那没有。
    使用经过验证的半结构化问卷对226名参与者进行了横断面研究,其中包括社会人口统计细节和关于他们知识的问题,态度,并在购买包装食品时练习食品标签。定量数据以平均值的形式呈现,标准偏差,平均值的95%置信区间(CI),中位数,和四分位数间距(IQR)。定性数据以数量(N)表示,百分比(%),95%CI的百分比。
    在226名参与者中,163(72.12)知道包装食品上的标签。共有77位(78.32%)参与者阅读了包装食品上的标签。最高零售价(MRP)和有效期是最常见的标签。尽管17.7%的消费者在购买时没有考虑营养成分,能量和蛋白质是最常被考虑的营养素。大多数人(70.35%)错误地认为果汁是健康的。包装食品标签的小字体使30.38%的顾客难以阅读。
    尽管人们对包装食品标签的认识有所提高,一小部分购物者不关心营养信息。与流行的知识相反,大多数人认为包装食品对健康有积极影响。
    UNASSIGNED: The basic product information, health, safety, and nutritional details, as well as food marketing, advertising, and promotion, are all provided on a packed food label. This study was carried out to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practices of the shoppers regarding food labels as there are few studies done in India and none in Pune.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 226 participants using a validated semi-structured questionnaire, which consisted of sociodemographic details and questions on their knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding food labels while purchasing a packed food item. Quantitative data are presented in the form of mean, standard deviation, 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean, median, and interquartile range (IQR). Qualitative data are in terms of number (N), percentages (%), and 95% CI of percentage.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 226 participants, 163 (72.12) were aware of the label on packaged foods. One hundred seventy-seven (78.32%) participants in all read the label on the packaged food. The maximum retail price (MRP) and expiration date were the most frequent labels sought. Although 17.7% of consumers did not consider nutrient composition when making a purchase, energy and protein were the most often considered nutrients. The majority (70.35%) falsely believed that juice was healthy. The packed food label\'s tiny font made it difficult to read for 30.38% of the customers.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite the increased awareness about packed food labeling, a fraction of shoppers were not concerned about nutritional information. In contrast to the prevailing knowledge, the majority believes packed food has a positive effect on health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多日常决定,包括那些关于我们健康的,财政和环境,涉及在较小但迫在眉睫的奖励之间进行选择(例如,现在20欧元)和后来但更大的奖励(例如,每月40欧元)。可以使用延迟折扣任务来测量个人偏好较小的即将到来的奖励而不是较大的延迟奖励的程度。急性压力会引起一系列的生物和心理反应,对个人如何思考未来产生潜在的影响。过程奖励,做出决定,所有这些都可能影响延迟折扣。几项研究表明,个人在压力下更关注即将到来的奖励。这些发现已被用来解释为什么个人在急性压力下做出有害选择。然而,将急性压力与延迟折扣联系起来的证据是模棱两可的。为了解决这种不确定性,我们对11项研究(14项效应)进行了荟萃分析,以系统地量化急性应激对货币延迟贴现的影响.总的来说,我们发现急性压力对延迟折扣没有影响,与对照条件相比(SMD=-0.18,95%CI[-0.57,0.20],p=0.32)。我们还发现参与者的性别都不是,压力源的类型(例如,物理vs.社会心理),也不是货币决策是假设的还是激励的(即货币决策实际上是支付的)缓和了急性压力对货币延迟贴现的影响。我们认为,建立急性压力对延迟贴现所涉及的单独过程的影响,如奖励估价和勘探,将有助于解决该领域的不一致。
    Many everyday decisions, including those concerning our health, finances and the environment, involve choosing between a smaller but imminent reward (e.g., €20 now) and a later but larger reward (e.g., €40 in a month). The extent to which an individual prefers smaller imminent rewards over larger delayed rewards can be measured using delay discounting tasks. Acute stress induces a cascade of biological and psychological responses with potential consequences for how individuals think about the future, process rewards, and make decisions, all of which can impact delay discounting. Several studies have shown that individuals focus more on imminent rewards under stress. These findings have been used to explain why individuals make detrimental choices under acute stress. Yet, the evidence linking acute stress to delay discounting is equivocal. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a meta-analysis of 11 studies (14 effects) to systematically quantify the effects of acute stress on monetary delay discounting. Overall, we find no effect of acute stress on delay discounting, compared to control conditions (SMD = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.20], p = 0.32). We also find that neither the gender/sex of the participants, the type of stressor (e.g., physical vs. psychosocial) nor whether monetary decisions were hypothetical or incentivized (i.e. monetary decisions were actually paid out) moderated the impact of acute stress on monetary delay discounting. We argue that establishing the effects of acute stress on the separate processes involved in delay discounting, such as reward valuation and prospection, will help to resolve the inconsistencies in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已发现与L/L载体相比,5-HTTLPR的S/S载体寻求损失的风险更大。这一发现可能是由于涉及杏仁核和腹侧纹状体的信号通路改变而导致额叶皮层自上而下控制减少的结果。已知5-羟色胺能系统参与神经发育和神经可塑性。因此,这项研究的目的是调查白质的结构差异是否可以解释寻求风险行为的差异.与L/L载波相比,S/S中的结构连通性较低,并且假设寻求损失的风险与连通性之间存在负相关关系。扩散加权成像用于计算175个基因型个体的额纹状体和钩束的扩散参数。结果表明,扩散参数与风险寻求损失之间没有显着关系。此外,我们没有发现S/S的扩散参数与L/L组。S/L组仅在额叶纹状体存在组间差异,显示出更强的结构连通性,这也反映在整个大脑的方法中。因此,数据不支持以下假设:5-HTTLPR与寻求损失风险之间的关联与决策中涉及的白质通路差异有关.
    S/S carriers of 5-HTTLPR have been found to be more risk seeking for losses compared to L/L carriers. This finding may be the result of reduced top-down control from the frontal cortex due to altered signal pathways involving the amygdala and ventral striatum. The serotonergic system is known to be involved in neurodevelopment and neuroplasticity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether structural differences in white matter can explain the differences in risk-seeking behaviour. Lower structural connectivity in S/S compared to L/L carriers and a negative relationship between risk seeking for losses and connectivity were assumed. Diffusion-weighted imaging was used to compute diffusion parameters for the frontostriatal and uncinate tract in 175 genotyped individuals. The results showed no significant relationship between diffusion parameters and risk seeking for losses. Furthermore, we did not find significant differences in diffusion parameters of the S/S vs. L/L group. There were only group differences in the frontostriatal tract showing stronger structural connectivity in the S/L group, which is also reflected in the whole brain approach. Therefore, the data do not support the hypothesis that the association between 5-HTTLPR and risk seeking for losses is related to differences in white matter pathways implicated in decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗保健专业人员如何理解和使用社会和认知能力的概念将影响他们的行为以及他们对他人行为的理解。对概念的不同理解可能导致医疗保健专业人员不按照其他医疗保健专业人员的期望行事。因此,关于社会和认知能力的错误和不良事件的问题的一部分可能是由于不同的医疗保健专业人员对概念的不同理解。这项研究旨在研究哥本哈根医学教育与模拟学院的教育工作者如何谈论社会和认知能力的变化。
    方法:该研究使用半结构化访谈和定向内容分析进行。分析过程的代码来自现有的非技术技能模型,用于显示参与者如何谈论相同概念的变化。
    结果:具有护士和医生背景的教育工作者,以不同的方式谈论领导和决策,护士在描述领导和决策时更加关注群体动态和外部因素,而医生专注于他们的个人努力。
    结论:我们发现参与者描述领导能力和决策的方式存在模式差异,这可能与参与者的专业培训/背景有关。因为如果护士和医生在领导和决策的含义上存在分歧(不一定认识到这种差异),可能会造成误解和不安全的情况。教育医疗保健专业人员意识到他们自己概念的特殊性可能是有益的,并通过使用特定的概念来传达它们的确切含义,例如,“我要你协调任务”而不是“我要更好的领导力”。
    BACKGROUND: How healthcare professionals understand and use concepts of social and cognitive capabilities will influence their behaviour and their understanding of others\' behaviour. Differing understandings of concepts might lead to healthcare professionals not acting in accordance with other healthcare professionals\' expectations. Therefore, part of the problem concerning errors and adverse incidents concerning social and cognitive capabilities might be due to varying understandings of concepts among different healthcare professionals. This study aimed to examine the variations in how educators at the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation talk about social and cognitive capabilities.
    METHODS: The study was conducted using semi-structured interviews and directed content analysis. The codes for the analysis process were derived from existing non-technical skills models and used to show variations in how the participants talk about the same concepts.
    RESULTS: Educators with a background as nurses and physicians, talked differently about leadership and decision-making, with the nurses paying greater attention to group dynamics and external factors when describing both leadership and decision-making, whereas physicians focus on their individual efforts.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found patterned differences in how the participants described leadership and decision-making that may be related to participants\' professional training/background. As it can create misunderstandings and unsafe situations if nurses and physicians disagree on the meaning of leadership and decision-making (without necessarily recognising this difference), it could be beneficial to educate healthcare professionals to be aware of the specificity of their own concepts, and to communicate what exactly they mean by using a particular concept, e.g. \"I want you to coordinate tasks\" instead of \"I want better leadership\".
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尼日利亚于2021年3月开始推出2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗接种,作为国家公共卫生应对大流行的一部分。作为涉及卫生技术评估(HTA)方法的更广泛过程的一部分,从适当的情境成本效益分析(CEA)中得出的结果对于为该领域的决策提供信息非常重要。在本文中,我们概述了确定参与选择的COVID-19疫苗利益相关者所遵循的过程,批准,资金,在尼日利亚采购和推广疫苗,并描述我们确定的过程路线,以支持尼日利亚采用与HTA相关的信息,以制定循证政策。
    方法:作为尼日利亚COVID疫苗HTA的一部分,我们与政策制定者和其他利益相关者接触的方法包括三个步骤,即:(一)与主要利益攸关方的非正式讨论;(二)利益攸关方映射,分析和参与;以及(iii)针对所产生的HTA相关证据的沟通和传播策略。利益相关者映射的分析使用电力/利益网格框架。
    结果:与主要利益相关者的非正式讨论产生了六个初步的政策问题。与政策制定者的进一步讨论产生了三个合适的政策问题供分析:应该购买哪些COVID-19疫苗;这些疫苗的最佳交付方式是什么;以及在尼日利亚政府优先推出的第二阶段疫苗中,为人们接种疫苗的成本和成本效益是多少?特别是年龄在18至49岁之间的人。利益攸关方绘图活动强调了尼日利亚境内可以利用本HTA提供的信息指导决策的组织和团体的范围。这些利益相关者包括公共/政府,制定的传播计划包括向主要利益攸关方传播HTA的全部结果;制作政策简报;在不同的国家和国际会议以及同行评审的出版物上进行介绍。
    结论:涉及利益相关者参与的HTA流程将有助于确保在设计任何HTA(包括任何基础证据生成)时考虑到重要的政策问题。需要有关整个HTA的利益相关者参与的进一步指导,特别是对于那些对疫苗采购和使用兴趣低的人。
    BACKGROUND: Nigeria commenced rollout of vaccination for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in March 2021 as part of the national public health response to the pandemic. Findings from appropriately contextualized cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) as part of a wider process involving health technology assessment (HTA) approaches have been important in informing decision-making in this area. In this paper we outline the processes that were followed to identify COVID-19 vaccine stakeholders involved in the selection, approval, funding, procurement and rollout of vaccines in Nigeria, and describe the process routes we identified to support uptake of HTA-related information for evidence-informed policy in Nigeria.
    METHODS: Our approach to engaging with policy-makers and other stakeholders as part of an HTA of COVID vaccination in Nigeria consisted of three steps, namely: (i) informal discussions with key stakeholders; (ii) stakeholder mapping, analysis and engagement; and (iii) communication and dissemination strategies for the HTA-relevant evidence produced. The analysis of the stakeholder mapping uses the power/interest grid framework.
    RESULTS: The informal discussion with key stakeholders generated six initial policy questions. Further discussions with policy-makers yielded three suitable policy questions for analysis: which COVID-19 vaccines should be bought; what is the optimal mode of delivery of these vaccines; and what are the cost and cost-effectiveness of vaccinating people highlighted in Nigeria\'s phase 2 vaccine rollout prioritized by the government, especially the inclusion of those aged between 18 and 49 years. The stakeholder mapping exercise highlighted the range of organizations and groups within Nigeria that could use the information from this HTA to guide decision-making. These stakeholders included both public/government, private and international organizations The dissemination plan developed included disseminating the full HTA results to key stakeholders; production of policy briefs; and presentation at different national and international conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
    CONCLUSIONS: HTA processes that involve stakeholder engagement will help ensure important policy questions are taken into account when designing any HTA including any underpinning evidence generation. Further guidance about stakeholder engagement throughout HTA is required, especially for those with low interest in vaccine procurement and use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管男性参与孕产妇保健多年来获得了越来越多的认可和支持,在刚果民主共和国,人们对男性在怀孕期间参与的情况知之甚少。本文确定了男性在怀孕期间的参与模式,并评估了其与怀孕和分娩准备知识的关联。性别平等的态度,自我效能感,和共同父母关系因素。最后,它探讨了性别平等态度和亲密伴侣暴力对关系满意度和男性参与之间的关系的调节作用。
    方法:分析了2018年动量基线研究的数据,以确定参与的预测因素。因素分析用于创建男性参与指数,以进行产前分娩准备和共同决策。样本包括基线时怀孕6个月的未分娩孕妇的1,674名男性伴侣。
    结果:男性参与个体妊娠相关活动的比例较低,从11%(寻找献血者)到49%(在紧急情况下省钱)。了解产前护理就诊次数,分娩准备步骤,和新生儿危险体征与参与产前护理/分娩准备活动呈正相关,而对产前护理益处的了解与参与共同决策呈正相关。增加的关系满意度和自我效能感与产前护理/分娩准备参与和共同决策有关,观察到与性别平等态度呈正相关,与自我效能感呈负相关.还检测到了调节作用。
    结论:研究结果表明,男性参与是多方面的,影响参与的因素因参与类型而异。解决这些因素可以改善男性对孕产妇健康的参与。
    BACKGROUND: Although male participation in maternal health has gained increasing recognition and support over the years, little is known about male involvement during pregnancy in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. This paper identified male involvement patterns during pregnancy and evaluated their associations with pregnancy and birth preparedness knowledge, gender-equitable attitudes, self-efficacy, and co-parental relationship factors. Lastly, it explored the moderating effect of gender-equitable attitudes and intimate partner violence on the association between relationship satisfaction and male involvement.
    METHODS: Data from the 2018 Momentum baseline study were analyzed to determine the predictors of involvement. Factor analysis was used to create male involvement indices for antenatal carebirth preparedness and shared decision making. The sample consisted of 1,674 male partners of nulliparous pregnant women who were 6 months pregnant at baseline.
    RESULTS: Male involvement in individual pregnancy-related activities was low, ranging from 11% (finding a blood donor) to 49% (saving money during emergencies). Knowledge of the number of antenatal care visits, birth preparedness steps, and newborn danger signs were positively associated with involvement in antenatal care/birth preparedness activities while knowledge of antenatal care benefits was positively associated with involvement in shared decisions. Increasing relationship satisfaction and self-efficacy were associated with antenatal care/birth preparedness involvement and for shared decisions, a positive association with gender-equitable attitude and a negative association with self-efficacy were observed. Moderation effects were also detected.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that male involvement is multifaceted and factors influencing involvement vary depending on the type of involvement. Addressing these factors can improve male participation in maternal health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反应时间(RT)是一种广泛用于测试运动任务中物理性能的方法。这项研究的重点是评估运动员的处理速度。25名健康志愿者被分配到对照组(n=16)或运动员组(n=9)。根据视觉刺激和三种困难条件,在运动反应任务中对它们进行了评估。从几块肌肉的运动捕捉和肌电图记录中获得生理测量。两个RT阶段,决策(DMK)和机电延迟(EMD),用于分析处理速度。结果显示各组之间的显著RT差异。与对照组相比,运动员的速度快了约30%。尽管所有参与者都是右撇子,RT在任何组中的手表现之间均未显示任何差异。然而,DMK时间显示双手之间存在显着差异。对照显示,右侧选举的DMK时间更长,比左边多20%,虽然运动员没有表现出这种差距。这些发现表明,量化反应时间的决策部分对于评估运动中的处理速度至关重要。这种方法可以促进对运动认知和神经肌肉过程中的适应的监测。本研究提出的理论意义为惯用手研究提供了视角。
    Reaction time (RT) is a widely used measure for testing physical performance in motor tasks. This study focused on assessing the processing speed in athletes. Twenty-five healthy volunteers were assigned to the control (n = 16) or athletes groups (n = 9). They were evaluated during motor reaction tasks based on visual stimuli and three difficulty conditions. Physiological measures were obtained from motion capture and electromyography recordings of several muscles. Two RT phases, decision-making (DMK) and electromechanical delay (EMD), were used to analyze the processing speed. The results show significant RT differences between groups. The athletes were ~30% faster compared to the control group. Despite the fact that all participants were right-handed, RT did not show any differences between hands performances in any group. However, DMK time revealed significant differences between the hands. Controls showed a longer DMK time for the right-hand election, ~20% more than the left, while athletes showed no such disparity. These findings reveal that quantifying the decision-making component of reaction time is crucial to assessing processing speed in sport. This approach could facilitate the monitoring of adaptations in both motor-cognitive and neuromuscular processes. The theoretical implications presented in this study offer perspectives on handedness research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类决策越来越受到人工智能(AI)系统的支持。从医学成像分析到自动驾驶汽车,人工智能系统正有机地嵌入到许多不同的技术中。然而,将此类建议纳入决策需要对AI输出进行人为合理化,以支持有益的结果。最近的研究表明,决策过程第一阶段的中间判断会干扰后续阶段的决策。出于这个原因,我们将这项研究扩展到AI支持的决策,以调查AI提供的建议的中间判断如何影响后续决策。在在线实验中(N=192),我们发现,对于那些做出中间判断的人和那些没有做出中间判断的人,信任会产生一致的支持效应。此外,在整个研究的所有时间间隔内都观察到了总概率的违反.我们通过演示量子概率理论如何在人类AI决策中对这些类型的行为进行建模,并在人为因素和信息特征的融合中改善对相互作用动力学的理解,进一步分析了结果。
    Human decision-making is increasingly supported by artificial intelligence (AI) systems. From medical imaging analysis to self-driving vehicles, AI systems are becoming organically embedded in a host of different technologies. However, incorporating such advice into decision-making entails a human rationalization of AI outputs for supporting beneficial outcomes. Recent research suggests intermediate judgments in the first stage of a decision process can interfere with decisions in subsequent stages. For this reason, we extend this research to AI-supported decision-making to investigate how intermediate judgments on AI-provided advice may influence subsequent decisions. In an online experiment (N = 192), we found a consistent bolstering effect in trust for those who made intermediate judgments and over those who did not. Furthermore, violations of total probability were observed at all timing intervals throughout the study. We further analyzed the results by demonstrating how quantum probability theory can model these types of behaviors in human-AI decision-making and ameliorate the understanding of the interaction dynamics at the confluence of human factors and information features.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号