cost‐effectiveness analysis

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,冷冻球囊消融(CBA)和射频消融(RFA)之间的临床有效性结果不一致,和成本评估之间的程序很重要。这项研究的目的是评估抗心律失常药物治疗难治性阵发性房颤(AF)患者的临床疗效和成本效益。
    进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。荟萃分析的主要结果是长期房颤复发。根据荟萃分析的结果,评估了日本CBA与RFA的成本效益.
    荟萃分析包括12项随机对照试验和6项倾向评分匹配队列研究。接受CBA治疗的患者房颤复发率略低于接受RFA治疗的患者。综合风险比为0.93(95%置信区间:0.81-1.07),综合风险比为0.96(95%置信区间:0.77-1.19),但没有发现显著差异。进行了成本最小化分析,以比较CBA与RFA的医疗成本,因为两种手术之间的AF复发风险没有显着差异。CBA和RFA的估计成本为4858544日元(32390美元)和4505255日元(30035美元),分别,RFA的成本节约为353289日元(2355美元)。
    我们的荟萃分析表明,与RFA相比,CBA在房颤复发方面具有相当的益处。如以前的研究所示。尽管治疗的选择应根据患者和治疗特点,RFA显示,与CBA相比,它可能节省成本。
    UNASSIGNED: Previous studies have shown inconsistent results in clinical effectiveness between cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cost assessment between the procedures is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness between the procedures in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The primary outcome for the meta-analysis was long-term AF recurrence. Following the results of the meta-analysis, the cost-effectiveness of CBA versus RFA in Japan was assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis included 12 randomized controlled trials and six propensity-score matching cohort studies. AF recurrence was slightly lower in patients referred for CBA than for RFA, with an integrated risk ratio of 0.93 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-1.07) and an integrated hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.19), but no significant difference was found. A cost-minimization analysis was conducted to compare the medical costs of CBA versus RFA because there was no significant difference in the risk of AF recurrence between the procedures. The estimated costs for CBA and RFA were JPY 4 858 544 (USD 32 390) and JPY 4 505 255 (USD 30 035), respectively, with cost savings for RFA of JPY 353 289 (USD 2355).
    UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis suggests that CBA provides comparable benefits with regard to AF recurrence compared with RFA, as shown in previous studies. Although the choice of treatment should be based on patient and treatment characteristics, RFA was shown that it might be cost saving as compared to CBA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的三十年里,个人安置和支持(IPS)已成为一种强大的循证方法,可以帮助患有严重精神疾病的人。比如精神分裂症,双相情感障碍,和严重的抑郁症,获得并在有竞争力的就业中取得成功。这篇评论涉及历史,原则,研究,以及IPS的未来发展方向。它涵盖了就业结果的当前证据,成本效益,和非职业成果。它还描述了当前将IPS扩展到新人群的尝试。作者提供了许多涉及严重精神疾病患者的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析的概述。对于解决非职业结果和新人群的研究,审查使用了现有的最佳证据。发表的评论认为,IPS使高收入国家的严重精神疾病患者能够以比接受其他职业干预措施的患者更高的比率在竞争性就业中取得成功。在IPS计划中,实施质量,用标准化的保真度量表测量,与更好的结果相关。就业本身导致收入增加,社会心理结果,临床改善,精神卫生服务使用减少。随着IPS稳步传播到新的人群和新的环境,研究在高收入国家活跃,并缓慢扩散到中等收入国家。IPS是高收入国家严重精神疾病患者的循证实践。它也显示了帮助其他残疾群体的希望,新兴研究旨在阐明适应和结果。
    Over the past three decades, Individual Placement and Support (IPS) has emerged as a robust evidence-based approach to helping people with severe mental illnesses, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, to obtain and succeed in competitive employment. This review addresses the history, principles, research, and future directions of IPS. It covers current evidence on employment outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and nonvocational outcomes. It also describes current attempts to extend IPS to new populations. The authors provide an overview of numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials involving people with serious mental illness. For studies addressing nonvocational outcomes and new populations, the review uses best available evidence. Published reviews agree that IPS enables patients with serious mental illness in high-income countries to succeed in competitive employment at a higher rate than patients who receive other vocational interventions. Within IPS programs, quality of implementation, measured by standardized fidelity scales, correlates with better outcomes. Employment itself leads to enhanced income, psychosocial outcomes, clinical improvements, and decreased mental health service use. As IPS steadily spreads to new populations and new settings, research is active across high-income countries and spreading slowly to middle-income countries. IPS is an evidence-based practice for people with serious mental illness in high-income countries. It shows promise to help other disability groups also, and emerging research aims to clarify adaptations and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多重因素,例如不太复杂的美国成人肺炎球菌建议,可以提高疫苗接种率,儿童肺炎球菌疫苗接种的间接影响,降低成人疫苗接种的影响,和增加疫苗犹豫(特别是在服务不足的少数民族),可能会降低增加老年人肺炎球菌疫苗接种计划的成本效益。先前的分析支持这些计划的经济优势。
    方法:马尔可夫模型比较了在黑人和非黑人65岁人群中没有或没有增加疫苗接种的计划和目前的建议(单独的20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗[PCV20]或15价肺炎球菌结合疫苗加23价肺炎球菌多糖疫苗[PCV15/PPSV23])。大流行前人群和血清型特异性肺炎球菌疾病风险和疾病/疫苗费用来自美国
    方法:计划费用为每个符合疫苗资格的人2.19美元,绝对疫苗接种可能性增加7.5%。德尔菲面板估计和试验数据告知疫苗有效性值。分析从医疗保健的角度来看,在一生的时间范围内以3%/年的价格贴现。
    结果:摄取计划总体上降低了肺炎球菌疾病。在黑人同伙中,与未接种疫苗相比,无计划的PCV20成本为每个质量调整生命年(QALY)216,805美元;有计划的PCV20的增量成本效益为245,546美元/QALY,有计划的PCV15/PPSV23的增量成本效益为425,264美元/QALY。在非黑人群体中,所有策略的成本>20万美元/季度收益。在考虑儿童疫苗接种的潜在间接影响时,所有战略都变得不那么具有经济吸引力。使用不太复杂的策略增加疫苗接种的效果可以忽略不计。在概率敏感性分析中,当前有或没有项目的建议不太可能在阈值<200,000美元/QALY时受到青睐。
    结论:美国目前针对老年人的肺炎球菌疫苗接种建议在有或没有增加疫苗接种的计划的情况下,不可能在经济上合理。应考虑包括与成人疾病相关的肺炎球菌血清型的当前肺炎球菌疫苗的替代方案。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple factors, such as less complex U.S. adult pneumococcal recommendations that could increase vaccination rates, childhood pneumococcal vaccination indirect effects that decrease adult vaccination impact, and increased vaccine hesitancy (particularly in underserved minorities), could diminish the cost-effectiveness of programs to increase pneumococcal vaccination in older adults. Prior analyses supported the economic favorability of these programs.
    METHODS: A Markov model compared no vaccination and current recommendations (either 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV20] alone or 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine plus the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PCV15/PPSV23]) without or with programs to increase vaccine uptake in Black and non-Black 65-year-old cohorts. Pre-pandemic population- and serotype-specific pneumococcal disease risk and illness/vaccine costs came from U.S.
    METHODS: Program costs were $2.19 per vaccine-eligible person and increased absolute vaccination likelihood by 7.5%. Delphi panel estimates and trial data informed vaccine effectiveness values. Analyses took a healthcare perspective, discounting at 3%/year over a lifetime time horizon.
    RESULTS: Uptake programs decreased pneumococcal disease overall. In Black cohorts, PCV20 without program cost $216,805 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with no vaccination; incremental cost-effectiveness was $245,546/QALY for PCV20 with program and $425,264/QALY for PCV15/PPSV23 with program. In non-Black cohorts, all strategies cost >$200,000/QALY gained. When considering the potential indirect effects from childhood vaccination, all strategies became less economically attractive. Increased vaccination with less complex strategies had negligible effects. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, current recommendations with or without programs were unlikely to be favored at thresholds <$200,000/QALY gained.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current U.S. pneumococcal vaccination recommendations for older adults were unlikely to be economically reasonable with or without programs to increase vaccine uptake. Alternatives to current pneumococcal vaccines that include pneumococcal serotypes associated with adult disease should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2018年,莫桑比克卫生部启动了实施差异化服务提供模式(DSDM)以优化艾滋病毒服务提供的指南,提高护理保留率,并最终降低与艾滋病毒相关的死亡率。模型是快速跟踪的,3个月的抗逆转录病毒药物配药,社区抗逆转录病毒治疗小组,坚持俱乐部,家庭方式和三个一站式商店模式:青少年友好型健康服务,妇幼保健,和肺结核。我们进行了成本效益分析和预算影响分析,以将这些模型与传统服务进行比较。
    方法:我们根据每个模型的入学率百分比和研究期间每年的结果概率(治疗保留12个月)构建了一个决策树模型,其中3个用于成本效益分析(2019-2021),3个用于预算影响分析(2022-2024)。从卫生系统的角度来看,这些分析的费用主要是按客户年估算的。从社会角度进行了二次成本效益分析。预算影响分析成本包括抗逆转录病毒药物,实验室测试和服务提供相互作用。成本效益分析还包括启动,培训和客户的机会成本。使用不受控制的中断时间序列分析来评估有效性,比较实施差异化模型前后的结果。进行了单向敏感性分析,以确定不确定性的驱动因素。
    结果:实施DSDM后,12个月保留率平均增加14.9个百分点(95%CI:12.2,17.8),从47.6%(95%CI,44.9-50.2)到62.5%(95%CI,60.9-64.1)。DSDM和常规护理的平均成本差异为-600万美元(173,391,277与179,461,668)和-3250万(394,705,618与433,232,289)从卫生系统和社会的角度来看,分别。因此,DSDM主导了常规护理。在单向敏感性分析中,结果对常规护理交互成本最敏感。对于150万人口来说,与DSDM相关的3年基本财务成本为5.5亿美元,与传统护理的5.64亿美元相比。
    结论:在开始抗逆转录病毒治疗12个月后,DSDM更便宜,更有效地留住客户,估计从2022年到2024年为卫生系统节省约1400万美元。
    BACKGROUND: In 2018, the Mozambique Ministry of Health launched guidelines for implementing differentiated service delivery models (DSDMs) to optimize HIV service delivery, improve retention in care, and ultimately reduce HIV-associated mortality. The models were fast-track, 3-month antiretrovirals dispensing, community antiretroviral therapy groups, adherence clubs, family approach and three one-stop shop models: adolescent-friendly health services, maternal and child health, and tuberculosis. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis and budget impact analysis to compare these models to conventional services.
    METHODS: We constructed a decision tree model based on the percentage of enrolment in each model and the probability of the outcome (12-month retention in treatment) for each year of the study period-three for the cost-effectiveness analysis (2019-2021) and three for the budget impact analysis (2022-2024). Costs for these analyses were primarily estimated per client-year from the health system perspective. A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the societal perspective. Budget impact analysis costs included antiretrovirals, laboratory tests and service provision interactions. Cost-effectiveness analysis additionally included start-up, training and clients\' opportunity costs. Effectiveness was estimated using an uncontrolled interrupted time series analysis comparing the outcome before and after the implementation of the differentiated models. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify drivers of uncertainty.
    RESULTS: After implementation of the DSDMs, there was a mean increase of 14.9 percentage points (95% CI: 12.2, 17.8) in 12-month retention, from 47.6% (95% CI, 44.9-50.2) to 62.5% (95% CI, 60.9-64.1). The mean cost difference comparing DSDMs and conventional care was US$ -6 million (173,391,277 vs. 179,461,668) and -32.5 million (394,705,618 vs. 433,232,289) from the health system and the societal perspective, respectively. Therefore, DSDMs dominated conventional care. Results were most sensitive to conventional care interaction costs in the one-way sensitivity analysis. For a population of 1.5 million, the base-case 3-year financial costs associated with the DSDMs was US$550 million, compared with US$564 million for conventional care.
    CONCLUSIONS: DSDMs were less expensive and more effective in retaining clients 12 months after antiretroviral therapy initiation and were estimated to save approximately US$14 million for the health system from 2022 to 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:中国量采购(VBP)计划于2022年启动。该计划启动后,机器人手臂辅助全膝关节置换术的成本效益尚不确定。该研究的目的是调查中国机械臂辅助全膝关节置换术的成本效益以及VBP计划对其成本效益的影响。
    方法:该研究是基于马尔可夫模型的成本效益研究。回顾性纳入2019年1月至2021年12月初次全膝关节置换术的病例。建立了马尔可夫模型来模拟晚期膝骨关节炎患者。在中国实施VBP计划前后,比较了手动和机械臂辅助的全膝关节置换术的成本效益。进行了概率和敏感性分析。
    结果:机械臂辅助全膝关节置换术在开始VBP计划前后显示出更好的恢复和更低的翻修率。基于机械臂的TKA优于手动全膝关节置换术,在应用批量采购之前的有效性增加了0.26(16.87比16.61),在应用批量采购之后的有效性增加了0.52(16.96比16.43),分别。该程序在新的采购系统中更具成本效益(17.13比16.89)。手动或机械臂辅助TKA的成本是我们模型中最敏感的参数。
    结论:基于中国以前和当前的医疗收费系统,与传统的手动全膝关节置换术相比,机械臂辅助全膝关节置换术是一种更具成本效益的手术。如基于数量的采购VBP计划所示,该程序可以更具成本效益。
    OBJECTIVE: The volume based procurement (VBP) program in China was initiated in 2022. The cost-effectiveness of robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is yet uncertain after the initiation of the program. The objective of the study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty and the influence of the VBP program to its cost-effectiveness in China.
    METHODS: The study was a Markov model-based cost-effectiveness study. Cases of primary total knee arthroplasty from January 2019 to December 2021 were included retrospectively. A Markov model was developed to simulate patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. Manual and robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasties were compared for cost-effectiveness before and after the engagement of the VBP program in China. Probability and sensitivity analysis were conducted.
    RESULTS: Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed better recovery and lower revision rates before and after initiation of the VBP program. Robotic arm-based TKA was superior to manual total knee arthroplasty, with an increased effectiveness of 0.26 (16.87 vs 16.61) before and 0.52 (16.96 vs 16.43) after the application of Volume-based procurement, respectively. The procedure is more cost-effective in the new procurement system (17.13 vs 16.89). Costs of manual or robotic arm-assisted TKA were the most sensitive parameters in our model.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on previous and current medical charging systems in China, robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty is a more cost-effective procedure compared to traditional manual total knee arthroplasty. As the volume-based procurement VBP program shows, the procedure can be more cost-effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    制定早期经济学评估(EEE),以评估GS在降低RoF和FoF方面的成本效益。
    进行了具有投资回报率(RoI)估算的成本效益分析(CEA)。CEA使用了最相关的参数,例如增加的步态速度和降低的FoF,为了估计RoF的减少,对使用的卫生保健资源的影响以及对英国国家卫生系统的财务影响。结果是根据RoF和FoF的减少而获得的每质量调整寿命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比来衡量的。使用的主要参数的不确定性通过概率敏感性分析进行评估。
    CEA结果表明,GS是改善跌倒或害怕跌倒的老年人运动的主要策略(基于FoF=0.77的增量QALYs和基于RoF=1.07的QALYs,FoF的成本=-4479.57英镑,RoF的成本=-2901.79英镑)。通过实施GS,ROI结果表明,根据RoF的减少,每磅对GS的投资可节省1.85英镑/患者的成本,根据FoF的减少,可节省11.16英镑/患者的成本.基于迭代次数的成本节约概率为79.4%(基于FoF)和100%(基于RoF)。
    EEE支持以下主要假设:GS是避免跌倒的有效干预措施,并且可能节省成本。
    UNASSIGNED: To develop an early economics evaluation (EEE) to assess the cost-effectiveness of the GS in reducing the RoF and FoF.
    UNASSIGNED: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with a return on investment (RoI) estimation was performed. CEA used the most relevant parameters, such as increased gait speed and decreased FoF, to estimate the reduction in the RoF, the impact on health care resources used and financial implications for the National Health System in the United Kingdom. Outcomes were measured as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained based on the reduction of the RoF and FoF. Uncertainties around the main parameters used were evaluated by probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The CEA results showed that the GS is a dominant strategy over the standard of care to improve the movements of older persons who have suffered a fall or are afraid of falling (incremental QALYs based on FoF = 0.77 and QALYs based on RoF = 1.07, cost of FoF = -£4479.57 and cost of RoF = -£2901.79). By implementing the GS, the ROI results suggest that every pound invested in the GS could result in cost savings of £1.85/patient based on the RoF reduction and £11.16/patient based on the FoF reduction. The probability of being cost saving based on the number of iterations were 79.4 percent (based on FoF) and 100 percent (based on RoF).
    UNASSIGNED: The EEE supports the main hypothesis that the GS is an effective intervention to avoid falls and is potentially cost saving.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高危短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中(TIAMIS)后双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的发生率并不理想。我们进行了成本效益分析,以表征旨在增加TIAMIS后DAPT使用的质量改进(QI)干预措施的参数。
    结果:我们构建了一个决策树模型,该模型比较了TIAMIS后当前全国DAPT使用率与实施旨在增加DAPT使用的理论QI干预后的使用率。基本情况假设QI干预将DAPT的使用率从45%提高到65%。成本(付款人和社会)和结果(中风,心肌梗塞,大出血,或死亡)是使用寿命范围建模的。每个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比<10万美元被认为是成本效益高的。进行确定性和概率敏感性分析。从付款人的角度来看,与目前的国家治疗率相比,aQI干预的终生成本节省为9657美元,质量调整后的生命年增加了0.18个.在73%的概率敏感性分析迭代中,QI干预具有成本效益。从社会角度来看,结果相似。可接受的最大值,最初,一次QI干预的一次付款人成本为每名患者28032美元。在基本情况下,将DAPT使用率提高到至少51%的QI干预具有成本效益。
    结论:在实施QI干预后,在TIAMIS患者接受DAPT治疗的成本和比例上,增加TIAMIS患者接受QI干预后DAPT的使用具有成本效益。我们的结果支持未来干预措施的发展,重点是增加TIAMIS后DAPT的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Rates of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after high-risk transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke (TIAMIS) are suboptimal. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to characterize the parameters of a quality improvement (QI) intervention designed to increase DAPT use after TIAMIS.
    RESULTS: We constructed a decision tree model that compared current national rates of DAPT use after TIAMIS with rates after implementing a theoretical QI intervention designed to increase appropriate DAPT use. The base case assumed that a QI intervention increased the rate of DAPT use to 65% from 45%. Costs (payer and societal) and outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleed, or death) were modeled using a lifetime horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year was considered cost-effective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. From the payer perspective, a QI intervention was associated with $9657 in lifetime cost savings and 0.18 more quality-adjusted life years compared with current national treatment rates. A QI intervention was cost-effective in 73% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis iterations. Results were similar from the societal perspective. The maximum acceptable, initial, 1-time payer cost of a QI intervention was $28 032 per patient. A QI intervention that increased DAPT use to at least 51% was cost-effective in the base case.
    CONCLUSIONS: Increasing DAPT use after TIAMIS with a QI intervention is cost-effective over a wide range of costs and proportion of patients with TIAMIS treated with DAPT after implementation of a QI intervention. Our results support the development of future interventions focused on increasing DAPT use after TIAMIS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    报告在女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的手术管理中,可调节锚定单切口微型吊索(微型吊索)与无张力标准尿道中部吊索(标准吊索)的成本效益。
    在英国21家医院中,从年龄≥18岁的女性中收集了有关资源使用和质量的数据,这些女性主要接受尿道中吊带手术。资源使用和生活质量(QoL)数据与单切口微型吊索和标准合成尿道中段吊索随机对照试验(SIMSRCT)一起前瞻性收集,用于女性SUI的手术治疗。采用了具有3年随访的卫生服务提供者(国家卫生服务[NHS])的观点来估算干预措施和所有后续资源使用的成本。通用仪器,EuroQolEQ-5D-3L,用于估计QoL。结果报告为增量成本,质量调整寿命年(QALY)和每QALY的增量成本。
    基本案例分析结果表明,尽管迷你吊索的成本较低,在3年随访期间,费用:小型吊索与标准吊索:£-6[95%CI-228-208]或QALYs:0.005[95%CI-0.068-0.073]无显著差异。存在很大的不确定性,有56%和44%的概率认为迷你吊索和标准吊索是最具成本效益的治疗方法,分别,QALY的支付意愿阈值为2万英镑。
    3岁时,小型吊索和标准吊索在成本和QALY上没有显着差异。在SUI治疗中使用的设备的长期并发症和故障率仍然存在一些不确定性;因此,重要的是建立这些手术的长期临床和成本效益。
    UNASSIGNED: To report on the cost-effectiveness of adjustable anchored single-incision mini-slings (mini-slings) compared with tension-free standard mid-urethral slings (standard slings) in the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
    UNASSIGNED: Data on resource use and quality were collected from women aged ≥18 years with predominant SUI undergoing mid-urethral sling procedures in 21 UK hospitals. Resource use and quality of life (QoL) data were prospectively collected alongside the Single-Incision Mini-Slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings Randomised Control Trial (SIMS RCT), for surgical treatment of SUI in women. A health service provider\'s (National Health Service [NHS]) perspective with 3-year follow-up was adopted to estimate the costs of the intervention and all subsequent resource use. A generic instrument, EuroQol EQ-5D-3L, was used to estimate the QoL. Results are reported as incremental costs, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost per QALY.
    UNASSIGNED: Base case analysis results show that although mini-slings cost less, there was no significant difference in costs: mini-slings versus standard slings: £-6 [95% CI -228-208] or in QALYs: 0.005 [95% CI -0.068-0.073] over the 3-year follow-up. There is substantial uncertainty, with a 56% and 44% probability that mini-slings and standard slings are the most cost-effective treatment, respectively, at a £20 000 willingness-to-pay threshold value for a QALY.
    UNASSIGNED: At 3 years, there is no significant difference between mini-slings and standard slings in costs and QALYs. There is still some uncertainty over the long-term complications and failure rates of the devices used in the treatment of SUI; therefore, it is important to establish the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of these procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状病毒给不同的卫生系统带来了巨大的支出负担。疫苗接种计划,对抗大流行疾病的关键解决方案,被称为预防和控制流行病的安全有效干预措施。我们的目标是进行系统审查,为全球所有卫生政策制定者提供经济证据,证明可用于对抗新冠肺炎的不同类型疫苗的价值。
    在Medline/PubMed上进行的电子搜索,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,Scopus,Embase,和其他经济评价数据库。相关和已发表的文章在2022年3月之前通过使用“疫苗接种”等关键字进行搜索,\"\"Covid-19,\"\"成本效益,“”成本效用,\"\"成本效益,经济评估,“和”经济评价。“其次是根据纳入和排除标准选择最合适的文章,捕获的数据和提取的结果。通过CHEERS2022的清单对文章进行的质量评估。最后,审查中包括13篇文章。
    所有信使RNA疫苗均占主导地位,在初级疫苗接种计划中,除了一项研究增强作用外,没有接种疫苗的覆盖率约为70%。从付款人的角度来看,从社会的角度来看,投资于疫苗的一美元的利润会更低。因此,初级大规模疫苗接种可以被认为是初级疫苗接种中具有成本效益的干预措施,可以挽救更多的生命并产生更多的积极外部效应。然而,当考虑到统计寿命值和全球经济和教育劣势时,所有疫苗的成本效益比都会增加.
    区域疫情中的COVID-19主要疫苗接种计划,从长远来看,将显示出可观的成本效益。有人建议,由于疫苗接种的正外部性,初级大规模疫苗接种,在COVAX-19TM的帮助下,与世界各地的个人生命损失以及经济和教育干扰相比,可以被认为是抗击病毒流行的可靠方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Coronavirus has burdened considerable expenditures on the different health systems. Vaccination programs, the critical solution against pandemic diseases, are known as safe and effective interventions to prevent and control epidemics. We aimed to perform a systematic review to provide economic evidence of the value of different types of vaccines available to combat the Covid-19 to all health policymakers worldwide.
    UNASSIGNED: Electronic searches conducted on Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and other economic evaluation databases. Related and published articles searched up to March 2022 by using keywords such as \"Vaccination,\" \"Covid-19,\" \"Cost-benefit,\" \"Cost-utility,\" \"Cost-effectiveness,\" \"Economic Assessment,\" and \"Economic evaluation.\" Followed by choosing the most suitable articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, data captured and the results extracted. The quality assessment of the articles performed by the checklist of CHEERS 2022. Finally, 13 articles included in the review.
    UNASSIGNED: All messenger RNA vaccines were dominant with approximately 70% coverage against no vaccination in the primary vaccination program except in one study that looked at booster effects. From a payer\'s perspective, a dollar invested in a vaccine would be less profitable than from a societal perspective. Therefore, primary mass vaccination can be considered a cost-effective intervention in primary vaccination to save more lives and produce more positive externalities. However, the cost-benefit ratio for all vaccines increases when statistical lifetime value and global economic and educational disadvantages are considered.
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 primary vaccination programs in regional outbreaks, from a long-term perspective, will demonstrate substantial cost-effectiveness. It is suggested that due to the positive externalities of vaccination, primary mass vaccination, with the help of COVAX-19TM, could be considered a reliable way to combat viral epidemics compared to the loss of individual lives and economic and educational disturbances around the world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经批准:慢性伤口是全球卫生保健系统的主要负担。在过去几年中,在慢性伤口的管理中出现了几种具有创新和活性剂的策略,如含透明质酸的伤口敷料。仍然缺少比较透明质酸和护理敷料标准(水纤维和银)的成本效益的证据。因此,这项研究的目的是,从德国法定健康保险的角度评估透明质酸与标准护理敷料(含银水纤维)在慢性伤口中的成本效益。
    UNASSIGNED:对决策树进行建模,以量化透明质酸和银质敷料策略在12周时的成本和愈合率。输入参数是基于文献收集的,考虑到治愈率,敷料价格和敷料变化和相关家庭护理的价格。参数不确定性由单向和概率敏感性分析考虑。
    UNASSIGNED:与标准护理(含银)敷料(59.62%;883.05欧元)相比,透明质酸显示出更好的治愈率(60.68%)和明显更低的成本(749.80欧元),导致增量成本效益比为-12,570.57。因此,透明质酸方法是慢性伤口管理中的主要策略。敏感性分析证实了这些结果,给出了一系列60%-70%的成本效益方案。
    UNASSIGNED:透明质酸敷料显示为临床更有效的策略,与标准护理(水纤维与银)相比,在慢性伤口中成本显着降低。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic wounds are a major burden for worldwide health care systems. In the management of chronic wounds several strategies with innovative and active agents emerged in the past few years, such as hyaluronic acid containing wound dressings. Evidence comparing the cost-effectiveness of hyaluronan and standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) is still missing. The aim of the study is thus, to assess the cost-effectiveness of hyaluronan versus standard of care dressings (hydrofiber with silver) in chronic wounds from a German statutory health insurance perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: A decision tree was modeled to quantify the cost and healing rate at 12 weeks for the hyaluronan and silver dressings strategies. Input parameters were collected literature-based, accounting for healing rates, dressing prices and prices for dressing changes and associated home care. Parameter uncertainty was accounted for by one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Hyaluronic acid showed a better healing rate (60.68%) and noticeable lower cost (749.80 Euro) compared to standard of care (silver containing) dressings (59.62%; 883.05 Euro), resulting in an Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio of -12,570.57. The hyaluronan approach is hence a dominant strategy in chronic wound management. Sensitivity analysis confirmed these results, giving a range of 60%- 70% of cost-effective scenarios.
    UNASSIGNED: Hyaluronic acid dressings showed to be a clinical more effective strategy at significantly lower cost in chronic wounds compared to standard of care (hydrofiber with silver).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号