Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is a superficial form of pemphigus. Treatment options for PF resemble pemphigus vulgaris, including glucocorticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and rituximab et al. These treatment approaches can effectively improve the condition but may also be accompanied by high risks of side effects. Therefore, it is crucial to find a safe and effective treatment options for patients with PF. It will not only benefit/be necessary for patients who refuse glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents treatments, but also for patients who cannot be treated with glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. Herein, we reported a case of PF that was treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. A 54-year-old woman presented with itchy erythema and erosions on the trunk for more than 1 month. The patient applied mometasonefuroate cream without improvement for a duration of two weeks. The past history of diabetes mellitus and atrophic gastritis was reported. Physical examination revealed scattered erythematous macules and erosions on the trunk. No mucosal involvement was observed. The condition was assessed by the pemphigus disease area index and numerical rating scale, with baseline scores of 7 and 8, respectively. Histopathological examination showed acantholysis and intraepithelial blister. Direct immunofluorescence revealed the presence of IgG and Complement 3 deposition between the acanthocytes with the reticular distribution. Based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results, the levels of Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies were 28.18 and 0.26 kU/L respectively. The diagnosis of PF was made. This patient was successfully treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. The patient has continued with apremilast 30mg once daily for maintenance and no adverse events related to apremilast such as gastrointestinal side effects were observed during the 9-month follow-up period. In conclusion, apremilast therapy without systemic glucocorticosteroids nor immunosuppressive agents might provide an effective alternative to management of mild PF without obvious side effect.

Pemphigus is a chronic autoimmune bullous disease associated with the production of autoantibodies directed against desmosomal proteins, such as desmogleins 1 and 3. Here, we present the case of an 83-year-old woman who was referred to us with suspicious cicatricial alopecia of the scalp and a small, eroded lesion on the forehead, previously labeled as atrophic actinic keratosis after a skin biopsy. In our clinic, after a careful examination of the case, we decided to perform two new skin biopsies of the scalp on suspicion of an inflammatory disease.

暂无摘要。

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a rare, potentially lethal blistering disease typically occurring in adulthood and characterized by autoantibodies directed against mucocutaneous desmosomal proteins. Clinically, flaccid vesicles, bullae and erosions after breakage are the main clinical features. According to the literature, the incidence of PV is rare in the pediatric population, ranging from 1 to 4% of reported cases. We describe an interesting case of a 12-year-old boy with severe PV that was referred to our university hospital for a mucocutaneous disease resistant to anti-infective therapy. Following the appearance of bullous lesions on the skin, antibody screening for autoimmune diseases showed positivity for PV and corticosteroid therapy was started. In view of the numerous adverse effects, we decided to set up biological therapy with rituximab, which was interrupted due to the onset of an urticarial reaction. Further second-line therapies were therefore attempted, with only a partial response. For this reason, a desensitizing therapy with rituximab was decided, thus allowing a clear improvement in the clinical picture and quality of life of the patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a child with severe PV resistant to conventional therapies and with an urticarial reaction to rituximab. This case highlights that despite PV being extremely rare in the pediatric population, this diagnosis should not be entirely discounted. In case of severe clinical manifestations, rituximab represents a valid option in children and desensitization tests should be recommended in the presence of hypersensitivity to this drug.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Pemphigoid diseases (PD) are autoimmune skin blistering diseases characterized by autoantibodies directed against proteins of the cutaneous basement membrane zone (BMZ). One of the major antigens is type XVII collagen (BP180), a transmembrane glycoprotein, which is targeted in four PDs: bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA dermatosis, and pemphigoid gestationis. To date, different epitopes on BP180 have been described to be recognized by PD disease patients\' autoantibodies. Different BP180 epitopes were associated with distinct clinical phenotypes while the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood. So far, the main effects of anti-BP180 reactivity are mediated by Fcγ-receptors on immune cells. More precisely, the autoantibody-antigen interaction leads to activation of complement at the BMZ and infiltration of immune cells into the upper dermis and, by the release of specific enzymes and reactive oxygen species, to the degradation of BP180 and other BMZ components, finally manifesting as blisters and erosions. On the other hand, inflammatory responses independent of Fcγ-receptors have also been reported, including the release of proinflammatory cytokines and internalization and depletion of BP180. Autoantibodies against BP180 can also be found in patients with neurological diseases. The assumption that the clinical expression of PD depends on epitope specificity in addition to target antigens, autoantibody isotypes, and antibody glycosylation is supported by the observation that epitopes of PD patients differ from those of PD patients. The aim of the present review is to describe the fine specificities of anti-BP180 autoantibodies in different PDs and highlight the associated clinical differences. Furthermore, the direct effects after binding of the autoantibodies to their target are summarized.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs) are rare, potentially life-threatening conditions often requiring immunosuppression. Throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, infection risk and mortality in patients with AIBDs are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We report the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with AIBDs and determined if patients on rituximab have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS: We examined clinical outcomes in 10 patients with AIBDs who developed SARS-CoV-2 infections at an American hospital. We performed a retrospective analysis of 132 patients with AIBDs enrolled in a clinical trial.
RESULTS: Patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 (n = 4) or death (n = 2) trended to be older. These patients had higher mortality than the national average (20% vs 1.6%). Our cohort included 52 patients with a history of rituximab treatment, 35 of whom were immunosuppressed by rituximab during the pandemic, and 45 patients never treated with rituximab. We found no difference between the rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients with AIBDs immunosuppressed by rituximab and those not on rituximab (9.1% vs 12.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed on demand rather than surveillance. Overall transmission varied over time, and outcomes depended on accepted treatments. The small sample size of our cohort limits the generalizability of our results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that rituximab does not increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 test positivity in patients with AIBDs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to our relatively small sample size.