Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is a superficial form of pemphigus. Treatment options for PF resemble pemphigus vulgaris, including glucocorticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and rituximab et al. These treatment approaches can effectively improve the condition but may also be accompanied by high risks of side effects. Therefore, it is crucial to find a safe and effective treatment options for patients with PF. It will not only benefit/be necessary for patients who refuse glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents treatments, but also for patients who cannot be treated with glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. Herein, we reported a case of PF that was treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. A 54-year-old woman presented with itchy erythema and erosions on the trunk for more than 1 month. The patient applied mometasonefuroate cream without improvement for a duration of two weeks. The past history of diabetes mellitus and atrophic gastritis was reported. Physical examination revealed scattered erythematous macules and erosions on the trunk. No mucosal involvement was observed. The condition was assessed by the pemphigus disease area index and numerical rating scale, with baseline scores of 7 and 8, respectively. Histopathological examination showed acantholysis and intraepithelial blister. Direct immunofluorescence revealed the presence of IgG and Complement 3 deposition between the acanthocytes with the reticular distribution. Based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results, the levels of Dsg1 and Dsg3 antibodies were 28.18 and 0.26 kU/L respectively. The diagnosis of PF was made. This patient was successfully treated with apremilast without systemic glucocorticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents. The patient has continued with apremilast 30mg once daily for maintenance and no adverse events related to apremilast such as gastrointestinal side effects were observed during the 9-month follow-up period. In conclusion, apremilast therapy without systemic glucocorticosteroids nor immunosuppressive agents might provide an effective alternative to management of mild PF without obvious side effect.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs) are rare, potentially life-threatening conditions often requiring immunosuppression. Throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, infection risk and mortality in patients with AIBDs are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We report the outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with AIBDs and determined if patients on rituximab have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS: We examined clinical outcomes in 10 patients with AIBDs who developed SARS-CoV-2 infections at an American hospital. We performed a retrospective analysis of 132 patients with AIBDs enrolled in a clinical trial.
RESULTS: Patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 (n = 4) or death (n = 2) trended to be older. These patients had higher mortality than the national average (20% vs 1.6%). Our cohort included 52 patients with a history of rituximab treatment, 35 of whom were immunosuppressed by rituximab during the pandemic, and 45 patients never treated with rituximab. We found no difference between the rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity in patients with AIBDs immunosuppressed by rituximab and those not on rituximab (9.1% vs 12.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Testing for SARS-CoV-2 was performed on demand rather than surveillance. Overall transmission varied over time, and outcomes depended on accepted treatments. The small sample size of our cohort limits the generalizability of our results.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that rituximab does not increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 test positivity in patients with AIBDs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to our relatively small sample size.

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is a rare condition associated with poor prognosis. It associates polymorphic mucocutaneous manifestations with neoplasia. Diagnosis is difficult because of the various clinical and histological features involved and the lack of specificity of immunological examinations.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients presenting with PNP in the Poitou-Charentes region between 2000 and 2015.
RESULTS: Seven patients were included. They presented 9 neoplasias (1 lymphoma, 1 melanoma, and 7 carcinomas) diagnosed from 4 months before to 25 months after the occurrence of cutaneous (6/7) and/or mucosal (6/7) polymorphic lesions. Histological examination revealed epidermal acantholysis (7/7), keratinocytic necrosis (4/7), and interface lichenoid dermatitis (5/7). Intercellular deposits of IgG and C3 or along the dermo-epidermal junction were detected with direct immunofluorescence (IF) (7/7). Four of 6 patients tested had positive indirect IF on rat bladder epithelium. Follow-up ranged from 1-132 months with a one-year survival of 85.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical and histopathological presentations observed in our patients were polymorphic, with overlap between the clinical and histological features of PNP and classical pemphigus. Prognosis and survival appear better in our series than in the literature. It is possible that in some cases, the association of pemphigus with neoplasia was fortuitous, which might account for the better prognosis. A new consensus on the diagnostic criteria for PNP is needed to help practitioners to consensually diagnose it for prognostic or therapeutic trials.

Bullous pemphigoid is the most common of the blistering disorders. It is most commonly found in the elderly and is diagnosed based on clinical, histologic, and immunologic criteria. It presents clinically with diffuse eczematous, pruritic, urticaria-like lesions, with the later appearance of tense bullae or blistering lesions typically filled with clear fluid. Histologically, a sub-epidermal blister is seen and immunofluorescence shows immunoglobulin G antibodies directed against the structural components of the keratinocytic hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and BP230. Multiple treatment modalities are present for this condition, including anti-inflammatory medications, medications that reduce antibody formation, and treatments to increase the elimination of antibodies. The aim of this case report is to present a classic case of this condition, to highlight an awareness of differing treatment options, and to advocate referral to a dermatologist given its potential severity.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4is) used to treat diabetes have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of bullous pemphigoid (BP). There are no previous reports analyzing the risk of BP in patients who are using other diabetes medications.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between diabetes medications other than DPP4i and development of BP.
METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of diabetes among patients with BP and the association between the use of diabetes drugs (excluding DPP4i, metformin, and insulin) and BP by analyzing national Finnish registry data for 3397 patients with BP and 12,941 patients with basal cell carcinoma as controls.
RESULTS: Our results show that 19.6% of patients with BP have type 2 diabetes. Use of none of the investigated medications was associated with an increased risk of BP.
CONCLUSIONS: Because this was a registry-based study, it was not possible to verify the accuracy of the diagnoses. The risk of BP in users of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists could not be analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the investigated diabetes drugs are not associated with an increased risk of BP in a Finnish patient database, indicating they can be safely used in this population. Generalization of these results to other populations will require further study.

暂无摘要。