Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) is an extremely uncommon hematological cancer with characteristics in common with both classical Hodgkin\'s lymphoma (HL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In this case report, we present a rare case of a 22-year-old male who developed HL initially and then transitioned to relapsed or refractory GZL. The disease relapsed twice throughout, even after the peripheral blood stem cell transplant. The initial biopsy suggested it was classical HL, and the biopsy was done late in the progression of the disease; the features suggested it was GZL. The treatment consisted of curative and preventive chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Hurthle cell tumors of the thyroid gland constitute a rare and enigmatic group of neoplasms, characterized by the presence of Hurthle cells exhibiting abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and numerous mitochondria. Despite their low incidence, they pose diagnostic challenges and display diverse clinical outcomes. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the clinicopathological profile of Hurthle cell tumors within a tertiary care center in South India.
METHODS: Through a retrospective approach, we analyzed cases of Hurthle cell tumors diagnosed and treated at a tertiary care center over a five-year period. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological data were meticulously collected and scrutinized. The study focused on examining demographic details, presenting symptoms, imaging features, cytological findings, surgical management, and postoperative outcomes of the patients.
RESULTS: A total of 32 cases of Hurthle cell tumors were identified during the study period. The majority of patients were female (84%), with a mean age of 49.6 years for Hurthle cell carcinoma. Thyroid enlargement and neck mass were the most common presenting complaints. Fine-needle aspiration cytology showed characteristic features suggestive of Hurthle cell tumors in 33% of cases. Total thyroidectomy remains the mainstay surgical approach. Histopathological evaluation confirmed 62.5% of cases as benign adenomas and 37.5% as malignant carcinomas. Among malignant cases, 67% showed capsular invasion and 33% demonstrated vascular invasion. Of the patients, 33.3% received adjuvant radiotherapy. The overall survival rate was 100%. In our study, we found that thyroid nodules larger than 3 cm demonstrated a higher propensity for Hurthle cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the multidisciplinary approach in managing Hurthle cell tumors, with a focus on tailored treatment plans for each patient based on individual characteristics. By recognizing the female predominance, assessing nodule size, and employing a combination of thyroidectomy and ablative therapy, clinicians can optimize patient care and contribute to better long-term prognosis and quality of life for those affected by Hurthle cell tumors. Continued research and collaborative efforts are necessary to advance our understanding and refine treatment strategies, paving the way for improved outcomes and enhanced patient management in the future.

This study aimed to present the treatment patterns and outcomes for adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) arising in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Sixty-one sinonasal ACC patients were retrospectively reviewed: 31 (50.8%) underwent surgery followed by postoperative radiation therapy (S+PORT), and 30 (49.2%) received definitive radiation therapy (D(C)RT). T4 disease was significantly more frequent in the D(C)RT group (25.8% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001), where all T4b disease patients underwent D(C)RT. The 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were 61.8% versus 37.8% (p = 0.003), 64.8% versus 38.1% (p = 0.036), 52.6% versus 19.3% (p = 0.010), and 93.2% versus 73.4% (p = 0.001) in the S+PORT and D(C)RT groups, respectively. The absolute differences in 5-year rates of LFFS, DMFS, and PFS between the two groups were smaller in the T3-4 subgroup. The univariate analysis showed that T4b disease, neurologic symptoms, longest diameter of tumor, radiological evidence of nerve involvement, and undergoing D(C)RT were associated with worse clinical outcomes, but the significance disappeared in the multivariate analysis, except for in the case of radiological evidence of nerve involvement. In conclusion, most patients with extensive disease underwent upfront D(C)RT and generally exhibited inferior clinical outcomes when compared to those with less extensive disease and who underwent S+PORT.

BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations for adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) use are similar for High Risk and Very High Risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) with negative post-surgical margins. Although studies report reductions in disease progression following ART treatment, ART use is likely inconsistent when guided by available risk factors. This study evaluated the association of ART with clinical risk factors in ART-treated and untreated patients and showed the clinical utility of the 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) for guiding ART.
METHODS: A multicenter study of 954 patients was conducted with institutional review board (IRB) approval. The 40-GEP test was performed using primary tumor tissue from patients with either a minimum of 3 years of follow-up or a documented regional or distant metastasis. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis identified patterns of clinical risk factors for ART-treated patients, then identified untreated patients with matching risk factor profiles. Results were cross-referenced to 40-GEP test results to determine utility of the test to guide ART.
RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated inconsistent implementation of ART for eligible patients. Cluster analysis identified four patient profiles based on clusters of risk factors and, notably, matching profiles in ART-treated and untreated patients. Further, the analysis identified patients who received but could have deferred ART on the basis of 40-GEP test result and biologically low risk of metastasis, and untreated patients who likely would have benefitted from ART on the basis of their 40-GEP test result.
CONCLUSIONS: ART guidance is not determined by the presence of specific clinicopathologic factors, with treated and untreated patients sharing the same risk factor profiles. cSCC risk determination based on NCCN recommendations for clinical factor assessment results in inconsistent use of ART. Including tumor biology-based prognostic information from the 40-GEP refines risk and identifies patients who are most appropriate and likely to benefit from ART, and those that can consider deferring ART.

Early identification and intervention in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) who are at high risk for metastasis is important for optimal outcomes. Prognostic tools (e.g., American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition [AJCC-8]) and management guidelines (National Comprehensive Cancer Network® [NCCN]) are useful in helping to identify high-risk patients with cSCC who might benefit from adjuvant therapies, such as radiation and/or immunotherapies; however, traditional staging and management guidelines rely on clinicopathologic risk factors to predict risk, which limits their prognostic accuracy. Gene expression profiling (GEP) is a clinically available, objective metric that can be used in conjunction with traditional clinicopathological staging to help clinicians stratify risk in patients with cSCC. The validated 40-GEP test can accurately classify patients with at least one high-risk feature as being at low (Class 1), higher (Class 2A), or highest (Class 2B) biological risk of nodal or distant metastasis within three years of diagnosis. A multidisciplinary panel comprising radiation oncologists and dermatologists/Mohs micrographic surgeons with expertise in cSCC management convened in June 2023 to discuss the utility of 40-GEP testing in cSCC clinical decision-making in regard to adjuvant radiation therapy (ART). The panel identified gaps in clinical practice in which 40-GEP testing has particular utility: in escalation of care for lower-stage patients with high-risk tumors; in de-escalation of care for patients for whom the risks of ART may outweigh the benefits; and in decision-making regarding elective radiation to the nodal basin. The expert panel developed a risk-based clinical workflow for ART in patients with cSCC, utilizing 40-GEP testing within NCCN management guidelines and AJCC-8 staging.

OBJECTIVE: Almost one third of cancer patients in the United States will develop brain metastases on an annual basis. Surgical resection is indicated in the setting of brain metastases for reasons, such as maximizing local control in select patients, decompression of mass effect, and/or tissue diagnosis. The current standard of care following resection of a brain metastasis has shifted from whole brain radiation therapy to post-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, there is a significant rate of local recurrence within one year of postoperative SRS. Emerging retrospective and prospective data suggest pre-operative SRS is a safe and potentially effective treatment paradigm for surgical brain metastases. This trial intends to determine, for patients with an indication for resection of a brain metastasis, whether there is an increase in the time to a composite endpoint of adverse outcomes; including the first occurrence of either: local recurrence, leptomeningeal disease, or symptomatic radiation brain necrosis - in patients who receive pre-operative SRS as compared to patients who receive post-operative SRS.
METHODS: This randomized phase III clinical trial compares pre-operative with post-operative SRS for brain metastases. A dynamic random allocation procedure will allocate an equal number of patients to each arm: pre-operative SRS followed by surgery or surgery followed by post-operative SRS.
OBJECTIVE: If pre-operative SRS improves outcomes relative to post-operative SRS, this will establish pre-operative SRS as superior. If post-operative SRS proves superior to pre-operative SRS, it will remain a standard of care and halt the increasing utilization of pre-operative SRS. If there is no difference in pre- versus post-operative SRS, then pre-operative SRS may still be preferred, given patient convenience and the potential for a condensed timeline.
CONCLUSIONS: Emerging retrospective and prospective data have demonstrated some benefits of pre-op SRS vs. post-op SRS. This study will show whether there is an increase in the time to the composite endpoint. Additionally, the study will compare overall survival; patient-reported outcomes; morbidity; completion of planned therapies; time to systemic therapy; time to regional progression; time to CNS progression; time to subsequent treatment; rate of radiation necrosis; rate of local recurrence; and rate of leptomeningeal disease.
BACKGROUND: NCT03750227 (Registration date: 21/11/2018).

Collision tumors are rare neoplasms displaying two distinct cell populations developing in juxtaposition to one another without areas of intermingling. There are currently no guidelines for the recommended treatment for such rare collision cases. We herein report a unique case of a 45-year-old female who presented with a left-sided palpable inguinal lymph node. A subsequent excisional biopsy yielded a diagnosis of collision lymphoma (CL) of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and germinal center diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This case report highlights the challenges in managing CL and the potential efficacy of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and rituximab regimen (R-CHOP) and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in treating this rare condition. Our goal is to enrich the literature with our case on CL in an attempt to progress to a path of ultimately establishing a definitive treatment approach to CL of DLBCL and HL.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal adenoid cystic carcinoma (EACC) is an exceedingly rare malignant tumor of the esophagus, posing significant challenges in the clinic.
METHODS: This report detailed the case of a 72-year-old male whose diagnosis of EACC was confirmed through postoperative histopathological examination. The patient underwent thoracoscopy-assisted radical resection of the esophageal tumor, coupled with lymph node dissection. Pathological findings revealed an adenoid cystic carcinoma infiltrating the entire layer of the muscularis propria, locally extending into the outer membrane of the esophageal fiber, involving the cardia and exhibiting no lymph node metastasis. The patient\'s condition was classified as primary EACC, T3N0M0, per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (2017; 8th edition). One month after surgery, the patient received postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: In addressing the rarity and high potential for biopsy misdiagnosis of EACC, this study delved into its diagnostic methods and treatment.

Uterine adenosarcoma remains a highly aggressive tumor and is less described in the literature, with an unfavorable prognosis and an increased risk of local and distant recurrence. However, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy offer local control of the disease, and overall survival remains reduced. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient with stage IIIB uterine adenosarcoma, confirmed by immunohistochemistry and initially diagnosed with postmenopausal metrorrhagia. The patient was managed through a multimodal treatment by conducting a multidisciplinary consultation.

Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) allows the preservation of the structures advocated to play a crucial role in the continence mechanism. This study aims to evaluate the association between adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) and urinary continence (UC) recovery after RS-RARP. For the purpose of the current study, all patients submitted to RS-RARP for prostate cancer (PCa) at a single high-volume European institution between January 2010 and December 2021 were identified. Only patients that harbored pT2 stage with positive surgical margins or pT3/pN1 stage with or without positive surgical margins were included in the analyses. Two groups of patients were identified as follows: patients who had undergone aRT and patients submitted to observation (no-aRT patients). As per definition, aRT was delivered within 1-6 months after surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 124 aRT patients were compared with 124 no-aRT patients who continued standard follow-up protocol after surgery. UC recovery was 81 vs. 84% in aRT vs. no-aRT patients (p = 0.7). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, aRT did not reach the independent predictor status for UC recovery at 12 months. In the subgroup analysis including only aRT patients, only the nerve-sparing technique was independently associated with UC recovery at 12 months. Conversely, the type of aRT (IMRT/VMAT vs. 3D-CRT) did not reach the independent predictor status for UC recovery at 12 months. The current study is the first to address the association between aRT and UC recovery in patients treated with RS-RARP for PCa. Based on our data, aRT is not associated with worse UC recovery. In the cohort of patients treated with aRT, the nerve-sparing technique independently predicted UC recovery.