adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

辅助放化疗
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    透明细胞癌(HCCCs)很少见,以低度性质为特征的恶性肿瘤。它们通常起源于小唾液腺。然而,这些肿瘤可能出现在任何有小唾液腺的地方,包括鼻咽.本报告介绍了两例61岁和72岁女性的HCCC病例,两个肿瘤的大小约为4厘米。在第一种情况下,一名72岁女性患者反复出现双侧鼻出血.影像学检查显示有鼻咽肿块,手术切除,组织病理学分析证实HCCC。术后,患者接受了联合化疗和放疗,2.5年后达到无复发状态。第二例涉及一名61岁的女性,有两年的流鼻血史。影像学检查发现鼻咽病变,手术切除,组织病理学检查证实为HCCC。该患者接受了放疗,然后是紫杉醇和卡铂的联合化疗,10个月后再评估未显示复发迹象。这些案例凸显了HCCC的成功管理,多模式方法,综合手术干预和辅助治疗。有利的结果强调了鼻咽部HCCC彻底治疗策略的重要性,为临床医生提供有价值的见解。进一步的研究对于增强我们对这种罕见实体的理解和完善治疗方案以优化患者预后至关重要。
    Hyalinizing clear cell carcinomas (HCCCs) are infrequent, malignant tumors characterized by their low-grade nature. They typically originate from minor salivary glands. However, these tumors can potentially emerge in any location with minor salivary glands, including the nasopharynx. This report presents two cases of HCCC in females aged 61 and 72 years, with both tumors approximately 4 cm in size. In the first case, a 72-year-old female presented with recurrent bilateral epistaxis. Imaging studies revealed a nasopharyngeal mass, surgically excised, and histopathological analysis confirmed HCCC. Postoperatively, the patient received combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, achieving a recurrence-free status 2.5 years later. The second case involves a 61-year-old female with a two-year history of bloody nasal discharge. Imaging studies identified a nasopharyngeal lesion, surgically removed, and histopathological examination confirmed HCCC. This patient underwent radiotherapy followed by combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin, displaying no signs of recurrence upon reevaluation after 10 months. These cases highlight the successful management of HCCC through a comprehensive, multimodal approach, integrating surgical intervention and adjuvant therapy. The favorable outcomes emphasize the significance of a thorough treatment strategy for HCCC in the nasopharynx, providing valuable insights for clinicians. Further studies are essential to enhance our understanding of this rare entity and refine treatment protocols for optimized patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估铂类辅助放化疗(POCRT)与术后放疗(PORT)对头颈部腺样囊性癌(HNACC)患者的疗效和毒性。
    方法:这项回顾性研究分析了2010年1月至2020年4月在我们中心诊断为HNACC的患者。使用1:1倾向评分匹配方法来创建匹配的队列。
    结果:在这项研究中,206例患者进行了分析,147例(71.4%)接受术后放疗(PORT),59例(28.6%)接受POCRT。21名患者经历了局部区域失败。3、5-,该队列的10年局部区域控制率(LRC)为92.0%,90.6%,86.9%,分别。在整个队列和匹配的队列中,与PORT组相比,POCRT组表现出更好的LRC(Gray\'stest,所有P<0.05*)。多因素分析确定辅助同步化疗是LRC的独立预后因素(竞争风险回归,HR=0.144,95%CI0.026-0.802,P=0.027*)。此外,POCRT组有较高的上消化道毒性和血液学毒性的发生率,包括白细胞减少症,中性粒细胞减少症,贫血(均P<0.05*)。
    结论:在减少HNACC患者的局部失败方面,POCRT可能提供比单独使用PORT更有效的治疗方法,尽管它也会增加治疗相关毒性的负担。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in comparison to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC).
    METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with HNACC at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to create a matched cohort.
    RESULTS: In this study, 206 patients were analyzed, with 147 patients (71.4%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 59 patients (28.6%) receiving POCRT. Twenty-one patients experienced local-regional failure. The 3-, 5-, and 10-yr local-regional control (LRC) rate for the cohort were 92.0%, 90.6%, and 86.9%, respectively. In both the entire cohort and the matched cohort, the POCRT group exhibited superior LRC compared to the PORT group (Gray\'s test, all P < 0.05*). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for LRC (Competing risks regression, HR = 0.144, 95% CI 0.026-0.802, P = 0.027*). In addition, the POCRT group had higher incidences of upper gastrointestinal toxicity and hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia (all P < 0.05*).
    CONCLUSIONS: In terms of reducing locoregional failures in HNACC patients, POCRT may potentially offer a more effective therapeutic approach than using PORT alone, although it also entails an augmented burden of treatment-related toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管辅助化疗(CT)对可切除的胆道癌(BTC)的作用已逐渐得到认可,辅助放化疗(CRT)的获益仍存在争议.我们的研究旨在比较BCT患者CRT与CT的预后。
    方法:可手术胆囊癌(GBCA)患者的临床病理特征,肝内胆管癌(IHBDC),或肝外胆管癌(EHBDC)从监测中获得,流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库(2004-2015年)。进行单变量和多变量分析以确定总生存期(OS)的预后因素。通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)减少了选择偏倚。使用Kaplan-Meier分析来估计生存时间。
    结果:在922名患者中,53.9%接受辅助CRT,46.1%接受辅助CT检查。多变量分析显示年龄,原发肿瘤部位,T级,N级,肿瘤大小,切除的淋巴结数量,和治疗是OS的独立危险因素。与CT相比,匹配队列中的PSM发现CRT对生存率的改善相似(28.0个月与25.0个月,p=0.033),特别是在GBCA队列中(25.0个月与19.0个月,p=0.003)。亚组分析显示,年龄≥60岁,女性,淋巴结阳性,肿瘤大小≥5cm,没有切除淋巴结疾病。
    结论:与辅助CT相比,辅助CRT与切除BTC患者的生存率改善相关,特别是在GBCA中。此外,年龄≥60岁的患者,女性,淋巴结阳性,肿瘤大小≥5cm,没有切除的淋巴结疾病可能会从辅助CRT中获得更多益处。
    BACKGROUND: Although the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for resectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) is gradually recognized, the benefit of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is still controversial. Our study is designed to compare the prognosis of CRT versus CT in BCT patients.
    METHODS: Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with operable gallbladder cancer (GBCA), intrahepatic bile duct cancer (IHBDC), or extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EHBDC) were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2004-2015). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Selection bias were reduced by propensity-score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the survival time.
    RESULTS: Within 922 patients, 53.9% received adjuvant CRT, and 46.1% received adjuvant CT. Multivariate analysis showed age, primary tumor site, T stage, N stage, tumor size, number of removed lymph nodes, and treatment were independent risk factors for OS. Similar improvement of CRT on survival was identified by PSM in the matched cohort compared with CT (28.0 months vs. 25.0 months, p = 0.033), particularly in GBCA cohort (25.0 months vs. 19.0 months, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis indicated CRT improved outcomes of patients with age ≥ 60, female, lymph nodes positive, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and none removed lymph node diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant CRT correlated with improved survival in patients with resected BTC compared with adjuvant CT, particularly in GBCAs. In addition, patients with age ≥ 60, female, lymph nodes positive, tumor size ≥ 5 cm, and none removed lymph node diseases may receive more benefits from adjuvant CRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆囊癌(GBC)的预后令人沮丧。这项研究旨在比较辅助放化疗(ACR)与单纯手术(S)和辅助化疗(AC)的结果。
    监视,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)计划数据库用于识别2004年至2015年间诊断为GBC并接受手术的患者。患者被分为S,AC,和ACR组根据他们的治疗。分类变量采用皮尔逊卡方检验进行比较,并进行1:1:1的倾向评分匹配分析(PSM)。用对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier曲线评估总生存期。进行亚组分析。
    在SEER数据库中确定了总共5451名患者。PSM之后,接受S的患者的两年生存率,AC,ACR为36%,39%,45%,分别。ACR与两年生存率改善相关(p<0.001),而AC和S组的生存率相似(p=0.127),但ACR组优于AC组(p=0.012)。亚组分析表明,虽然II期GBC患者的两年生存率在组间没有显着差异(均p>0.05),在Ⅲa期,ACR与显著提高2年生存率相关(p=0.008)。Ⅲb(p<0.001),和Ⅳb(p<0.001)GBC患者。
    手术和ACR作为治疗方式的结合为GBC患者提供了更大的生存益处。特别是对于那些晚期肿瘤分期。
    UNASSIGNED: The prognosis of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is dismal. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACR) with those of surgery alone (S) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).
    UNASSIGNED: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database was used to identify patients diagnosed with GBC and undergoing surgery between 2004 and 2015. The patients were divided into the S, AC, and ACR groups according to their treatment. Categorical variables were compared by Pearson\'s chi-square test, and a 1:1:1 propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed. Overall survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 5451 patients were identified in the SEER database. After PSM, the two-year survival among patients who received S, AC, and ACR was 36%, 39%, and 45%, respectively. ACR was associated with improved two-year survival (p < 0.001), while the survival rates were similar in the AC and S groups (p = 0.127) but better in the ACR group than in the AC group (p = 0.012). Subgroup analyses indicated that while the two-year survival rates did not differ significantly in stage II GBC patients between the groups (all p > 0.05), ACR was associated with significantly improved two-year survival in stage Ⅲa (p = 0.008), Ⅲb (p < 0.001), and Ⅳb (p < 0.001) GBC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of surgery and ACR as the treatment modality provided greater survival benefits for GBC patients, particularly for those with advanced tumor staging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    子宫内膜癌是世界上最常见的妇科肿瘤之一。然而,可用的辅助疗法,化疗(CT)和放疗(RT),显示了单独使用时的几个局限性。因此,我们根据总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)进行了一项荟萃分析,以探讨放化疗(CRT)的临床疗效.
    对5个数据库和1个临床试验注册中心进行了文献检索,以获得所有相关文章。搜索研究于2021年9月9日完成。进行了荟萃分析,以确定95%置信区间的总体风险比。
    共纳入17篇文献,CRTvsRT组23975例,CRTvsCT组50502例。与RT相比,CRT的OS危险比(HR)为0.66(95%CI[0.59-0.75];P<0.00001)。与CT相比,OSHR为0.70(95%CI[0.64-0.78];P<0.00001)。与仅CT相比,CRT也显着改善了DFS(HR0.79,95%CI[0.64-0.97];P=0.02)。与仅RT相比,CRT没有改善DFS,HR为0.71(95%CI[0.46-1.09];P=0.12)。
    在晚期子宫内膜癌患者中,与单纯CT或RT相比,辅助CRT可显著改善OS,与单纯CT相比可显著改善DFS。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的CRT方案,以及CRT对谁最有利。
    Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological cancer in the world. However, the available adjuvant therapies, chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT), demonstrated several limitations when used alone. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the clinical effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) based on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
    A literature search was performed on five databases and one clinical trial registry to obtain all relevant articles. Search for studies was completed on September 9, 2021. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the overall hazard ratio with the 95% Confidence Interval.
    A total of 17 articles with 23,975 patients in the CRT vs RT group and 50,502 patients in the CRT vs CT group were included. The OS Hazard Ratios (HR) of CRT compared to RT was 0.66 (95% CI [0.59-0.75]; P < 0.00001). Compared to CT, the OS HR was 0.70 (95% CI [0.64-0.78]; P < 0.00001). CRT also significantly improved the DFS compared to CT only (HR 0.79, 95% CI [0.64-0.97]; P = 0.02) However, CRT did not improve the DFS compared to RT only, with HR of 0.71 (95% CI [0.46-1.09]; P = 0.12).
    Adjuvant CRT can significantly improve OS compared to CT or RT alone and improve the DFS compared to CT alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Further research is needed to identify the optimal CRT regimen, and to whom CRT will be most beneficial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的目的是调查接受辅助调强放疗(IMRT)治疗的胰腺癌患者的复发模式,并将局部复发部位与放疗靶区相关联。
    UNASSIGNED:评估了38例胰腺癌切除和辅助放化疗的患者。辅助化疗(CHT)1~3个周期后开始放疗(RT)。根据RTOG指南对临床目标体积(CTV)进行轮廓化。所有患者均接受45-50.4Gy剂量的IMRT治疗。复发时的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像与放疗计划相关。局部复发被归类为现场复发,外场和边缘。
    UNASSIGNED:中位总生存期(OS)为19个月。一年和两年OS率分别为73.6%和37.1%,分别。在11例(28.9%)和23例(60.5%)患者中观察到局部复发和远处转移。分别。对于11次局部复发,7在现场,1是边缘的,还有3人在野外。一名患者与当地隔离,2例患者有孤立的区域,15例(57.6%)患者仅有远处衰竭。最初的失败表现大多很遥远(58%)。在多变量分析中,肿瘤大小≥3cm(p=0.011)和血管侵犯阳性(p=0.014)预测OS率较差。
    UNASSIGNED:在接受术后IMRT治疗的胰腺癌患者中,大多数局部复发发生在放疗领域。然而,失败主要是遥远的,和改善系统控制可能是特别感兴趣的。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to investigate the recurrence patterns in pancreatic cancer patients treated with adjuvant intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and to correlate the sites of locoregional recurrence with radiotherapy target volumes.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-eight patients who had undergone resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer were evaluated. Radiotherapy (RT) was started after 1-3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). Clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured according to the RTOG guideline. All patients were treated with IMRT with a dose of 45-50.4 Gy. Computerized tomography (CT) images at the time of recurrence were correlated with radiotherapy plans. Locoregional recurrences were classified as in-field, out-field and marginal.
    UNASSIGNED: Median overall survival (OS) was 19 months. One- and 2-year OS rates were 73.6% and 37.1%, respectively. Locoregional recurrence and distant metastases were observed in 11 (28.9%) and 23 (60.5%) patients, respectively. For the 11 locoregional recurrences, 7 were in-field, 1 was marginal, and 3 were out-of-field. One patient had isolated local, 2 patients had isolated regional and 15 (57.6%) patients had only distant failures. The first presentations of failures were mostly distant (58%). On multivariate analysis, tumor size ≥ 3 cm (p = 0.011) and positive vascular invasion (p = 0.014) predicted for worse OS rate.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of locoregional recurrences were in the radiation field among pancreatic cancer patients treated with postoperative IMRT. However, failures were predominantly distant, and improvement of systemic control may be of particular interest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于胃食管交界处(AGE)的SiewertII/III型腺癌,D2/R0切除后辅助放化疗(CRT)的疗效尚不确定.
    目的:确定局部晚期SiewertII/III型AGE在D2/R0切除后CRT是否优于单纯化疗(CT)。
    方法:我们确定了2011年至2018年在国家癌症中心接受D2/R0切除治疗的316例局部晚期SiewertII/III型AGE患者。57例患者接受辅助CRT,259例患者接受辅助CT。我们跟踪患者的总生存期(OS),无复发生存,和复发模式。
    结果:所有患者的CRT组和CT组的五年OS率分别为66.7%和41.9%(P=0.010)。SiewertIII型AGE患者的CRT组和CT组的五年OS率分别为65.7%和43.9%(P=0.006)。在可以获得复发信息的195例患者中,CRT组和CT组分别诊断复发18例(34.6%)和61例(42.7%),分别。CRT组的局部和区域复发率低于CT组(22.2%vs24.6%,27.8%对39.3%)。多变量cox回归分析显示,血管侵犯,神经侵入,辅助CRT是SiewertIII型AGE的重要预后因素。
    结论:对于本地先进的SiewertIII型AGE,辅助CRT可能延长OS并降低局部复发率。
    BACKGROUND: For Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of gastroesophageal junction (AGE), the efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after D2/R0 resection remains uncertain.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CRT was superior to chemotherapy (CT) alone after D2/R0 resection for locally advanced Siewert type II/III AGE.
    METHODS: We identified 316 locally advanced Siewert type II/III AGE patients who were treated with D2/R0 resection at National Cancer Center from 2011 to 2018. 57 patients received adjuvant CRT and 259 patients received adjuvant CT. We followed patients for overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival, and recurrence pattern.
    RESULTS: Five-year OS rates of the CRT group and the CT group for all patients were 66.7% and 41.9% (P = 0.010). Five-year OS rates of the CRT group and the CT group for Siewert type III AGE patients were 65.7% and 43.9% (P = 0.006). Among the 195 patients whose recurrence information could be obtained, 18 cases (34.6%) and 61 cases (42.7%) were diagnosed as recurrence in the CRT group and CT group, respectively. The local and regional recurrence rates in the CRT group were lower than that in the CT group (22.2% vs 24.6%, 27.8% vs 39.3%). Multivariable cox regression analysis showed that vascular invasion, nerve invasion, and adjuvant CRT were important prognostic factors for Siewert type III AGE.
    CONCLUSIONS: For locally advanced Siewert type III AGE, adjuvant CRT may prolong OS and reduce the regional recurrence rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最常诊断的原发性脑肿瘤是胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)。几乎所有患者都经历肿瘤复发,其中高达90%是局部复发。因此,使用大分割立体定向放疗(HSRT)增加放疗的治疗比例可以减少治疗时间,并可能增加肿瘤控制并提高生存率。评价HSRT与调强放疗(IMRT)联合替莫唑胺在GBM患者术后的疗效和毒性反应,为进一步的随机对照试验提供依据。
    方法:HSCK-010是开放标签,单臂II期试验(NCT04547621),纳入接受大体全切除的新诊断GBM患者.患者将接受30Gy/5fxHSRT的组合,20Gy/10fx联合替莫唑胺和辅助化疗的IMRT辅助治疗。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要结果包括无进展生存率(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),治疗前后的生活质量(Qol),治疗前后的认知功能,和治疗相关不良事件(AE)的发生率。HSRT和IMRT联合替莫唑胺可使患者术后获益,且生存良好。可接受的毒性,减少治疗时间。
    背景:NCT04547621。于2020年9月14日注册。
    BACKGROUND: The most frequently diagnosed primary brain tumor is glioblastoma (GBM). Nearly all patients experience tumor recurrence and up to 90% of which is local recurrence. Thus, increasing the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) can reduce treatment time and may increase tumor control and improve survival. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of HSRT and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with temozolomide after surgery in GBM patients and provide evidence for further randomized controlled trials.
    METHODS: HSCK-010 is an open-label, single-arm phase II trial (NCT04547621) which includes newly diagnosed GBM patients who underwent gross total resection. Patients will receive the combination of 30 Gy/5fx HSRT, and 20 Gy/10fx IMRT adjuvant therapy with concurrent temozolomide and adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival (PFS) rate, objective-response rate (ORR), quality of life (Qol) before and after the treatment, cognitive function before and after the treatment, and rate of treatment-related adverse events (AE). The combination of HSRT and IMRT with temozolomide can benefit the patients after surgery with good survival, acceptable toxicity, and reduced treatment time.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04547621 . Registered on 14 September 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较D2/R0切除后III期胃癌或胃食管交界处(GEJ)癌的辅助放化疗(CRT)组和化疗(CT)组的生存获益。
    2011年1月至2018年5月,819名患者(CRT组:215名患者,CT组:604例)对D2/R0切除后病理诊断为III期的患者进行回顾性收集,分析其生存和复发模式。基于倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡基线特征。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归模型比较两组患者的生存获益情况。
    在PSM之前或之后,CRT组的5年总生存率(OS)均显着高于CT组。多变量Cox回归分析发现,晚期TNM分期患者(P<0.001)和未接受辅助CRT患者(P=0.008)的OS明显较差。对于复发模式,CRT组有85例(39.5%)患者和CT组有300例(49.7%)患者被诊断为复发(P=0.011)。CRT组的区域复发率低于CT组(20.5%vs.35.1%,P=0.028)。
    对于被诊断为III期胃癌或胃食管交界处癌的患者,辅助放化疗的增加将显著提高总生存率和区域控制。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the survival benefit in the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group and chemotherapy (CT) group for stage III gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer after D2/R0 resection.
    UNASSIGNED: From January 2011 to May 2018, 819 patients (CRT group: 215 patients, CT group: 604 patients) diagnosed as pathological stage III after D2/R0 resection were retrospectively collected and the survival and recurrence patterns were analyzed. The baseline characteristics were balanced based on propensity score matching (PSM). The survival benefit was compared between two groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression model.
    UNASSIGNED: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in the CRT group was significantly higher than that in the CT group whether before or after the PSM. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the significant poor OS in patients with advanced TNM stage (P < 0.001) and patients who did not receive the adjuvant CRT (P = 0.008). For the recurrence patterns, 85 (39.5%) patients in the CRT group and 300 (49.7%) patients in the CT group were diagnosed as recurrence (P = 0.011). The regional recurrence in the CRT group was less than that in the CT group (20.5% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.028).
    UNASSIGNED: For patients diagnosed as stage III gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer, the addition of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy will significantly improve the overall survival and regional control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:本研究旨在探讨我们的理性情绪行为疗法(REBT)计划对症状的影响,焦虑,抑郁症,接受化疗的结直肠癌(CRC)患者的睡眠状态。
    UNASSIGNED:选择2020年10月至2021年5月湖南省某医院56例CRC患者,随机分为干预组(28例)和对照组(28例)。干预组患者在常规护理基础上完成为期6周的REBT方案,包括4个课程:1)建立关系,制定健康档案;2)团体沟通,研究症状管理;3)持续提供健康知识,加强健康行为;4)回顾治疗和总结。对照组保持常规护理。简体中文版纪念症状评估量表简表(MSAS-SF-SC),医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)量表对两组患者基线时(T1、干预前)的干预效果进行调查比较,四周(T2),干预后6周(T3)。
    UNASSIGNED:干预组症状明显改善,焦虑,抑郁症,和睡眠状态,与对照组相比。在T2时,MSAS-SF-SC(24.43±4.26vs.28.07±3.91),症状困扰(17.29±4.04vs.19.39±3.59),症状频率(7.14±1.51vs.8.68±1.42),HADS(13.68±3.38vs.15.86±3.79),焦虑(3.89±1.85vs.5.18±2.18),和抑郁(9.79±2.06vs.10.68±2.23),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T3时,MSAS-SF-SC(23.89±3.54vs.30.14±3.94),症状困扰(17.61±3.52vs.21.32±3.57),症状频率(6.29±1.49vs.8.82±1.47),HADS(11.82±2.57vs.16.29±3.13),焦虑(3.21±1.64vs.5.61±1.77),和抑郁症(8.61±1.52vs.10.68±1.81),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T3时干预组睡眠状态优于对照组,PSQI评分降低[4.00(3.00,8.00)vs.9.00(7.00,12.50),Z=-3.706,P<0.001]。
    UNASSIGNED:为期6周的REBT计划可有效改善症状,焦虑,抑郁症,接受化疗的CRC患者的睡眠状态,这可以作为反复入院接受化疗的CRC患者的护理计划。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the effects of our rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) program on symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep state in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing chemotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: From October 2020 to May 2021, fifty-six patients with CRC in a hospital in the Hunan Province were randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 28) and a control group (n = 28). The patients in the intervention group completed a 6-week REBT program based on routine nursing care, including four courses: 1) establish a relationship and formulate health files; 2) group communications and study symptom management; 3) continuously provide health knowledge and strengthen healthy behavior; and 4) review the treatment and summary. The control group maintained routine nursing care. The simplified Chinese version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale Short Form (MSAS-SF-SC), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale were used to investigate and compare the intervention effects of the two groups at baseline (T1, before the intervention), four weeks (T2), and six weeks (T3) after the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: The intervention group was significantly improved in symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sleep state, compared with the control group. At T2, MSAS-SF-SC (24.43 ± 4.26 vs.28.07 ± 3.91), symptom distress (17.29 ± 4.04 vs. 19.39 ± 3.59), symptom frequency (7.14 ± 1.51 vs. 8.68 ± 1.42), HADS (13.68 ± 3.38 vs. 15.86 ± 3.79), anxiety (3.89 ± 1.85 vs. 5.18 ± 2.18), and depression (9.79 ± 2.06 vs. 10.68 ± 2.23), showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At T3, MSAS-SF-SC (23.89 ± 3.54 vs. 30.14 ± 3.94), symptom distress (17.61 ± 3.52 vs. 21.32 ± 3.57), symptom frequency (6.29 ± 1.49 vs. 8.82 ± 1.47), HADS (11.82 ± 2.57 vs. 16.29 ± 3.13), anxiety (3.21 ± 1.64 vs. 5.61 ± 1.77), and depression (8.61 ± 1.52 vs. 10.68 ± 1.81), showed that the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sleep state of the intervention group was better than the control group at T3, with decreased score of PSQI [4.00 (3.00,8.00) vs. 9.00 (7.00,12.50), Z = -3.706, P < 0.001].
    UNASSIGNED: The 6-week REBT program can effectively improve the symptom, anxiety, depression, and sleep state of patients with CRC undergoing chemotherapy, which could as a care plan for patients with CRC who are repeatedly admitted to the hospital for chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号