Unexplained chronic cough

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性咳嗽,持续超过8周的咳嗽,包括难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)和原因不明的慢性咳嗽(UCC)。需要通过患者报告结果(PRO)来更好地了解对患者最重要的慢性咳嗽影响。19项莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ),现有的慢性咳嗽的PRO措施,评估咳嗽对身体的影响,心理,和社会领域。然而,LCQ在RCC/UCC患者中评估这些概念的内容效度尚未确定.
    评估LCQ在RCC/UCC患者中的内容效度。
    横截面,定性访谈研究。
    首先,评估了先前完成的RCC/UCC成人(N=30)的定性访谈结果,并将其映射到LCQ概念.接下来,临床咳嗽专家审查了每个LCQ项目,并评估了其概念对RCC/UCC患者的重要性。最后,在患有RCC/UCC(N=20)的成年人中进行了半结构化访谈,包括概念启发和认知汇报,以引出一组全面的参与者经验,并评估在该人群中使用LCQ的适当性.
    过去和现在的定性访谈报告的概念包括在所有LCQ项目中,LCQ评估了大多数报告为“最麻烦”的影响。在目前的研究中,所有参与者均表示,减少咳嗽频率将是一个重要的治疗目标.在认知汇报期间,每个LCQ项目都得到70%的参与者的认可。此外,参与者通常能够理解,召回,并为每个LCQ项目选择一个响应。所有参与者和临床专家都表示LCQ是适当的,并评估了与RCC/UCC患者最相关的影响。
    我们的发现支持LCQ的内容有效性,并证明该措施适合目的,并且包括RCC/UCC成人的重要咳嗽影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Chronic cough, a cough lasting >8 weeks, includes refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are needed to better understand chronic cough impacts that matter most to patients. The 19-item Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), an existing PRO measure of chronic cough, assesses impacts of cough across physical, psychological, and social domains. However, the content validity of the LCQ evaluating these concepts in patients with RCC/UCC had not been established.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the content validity of the LCQ in patients with RCC/UCC.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional, qualitative interview study.
    UNASSIGNED: First, previously completed qualitative interview results in adults with RCC/UCC (N = 30) were evaluated and mapped to LCQ concepts. Next, a clinical cough expert reviewed each LCQ item and assessed the salience of its concepts for patients with RCC/UCC. Finally, semistructured interviews-including both concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing-were conducted in adults with RCC/UCC (N = 20) to elicit a comprehensive set of participant experiences and to assess the appropriateness of using the LCQ in this population.
    UNASSIGNED: Concepts reported in the past and present qualitative interviews were included across all LCQ items, and most impacts reported to be the \"most bothersome\" were assessed in the LCQ. In the current study, all participants indicated that reduced cough frequency would be an important treatment target. During cognitive debriefing, each LCQ item was endorsed by ⩾70% of participants. Additionally, participants were generally able to understand, recall, and select a response for each LCQ item. All participants and the clinical expert indicated that the LCQ was appropriate and assessed the impacts most relevant to patients with RCC/UCC.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings support the content validity of the LCQ and demonstrate that this measure is fit-for-purpose and includes important cough impacts in adults with RCC/UCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难治性和无法解释的慢性咳嗽(RCC和UCC)需要频繁转诊以进行专科评估,但是缺乏有关医疗资源利用率和成本的数据。
    方法:这项观察性研究招募了患有RCC或UCC的成年人,他们在咳嗽专科诊所就诊,并包括一个对照组,都来自英格兰西北部,匹配1:5的年龄,性别和吸烟史。获得了初次就诊前5年和初次就诊后2年的初级和二级护理数据(指数)。主要终点是与对照组相比,英国NHS预RCC或UCC诊断的5年总医疗保健费用。
    结果:200例RCC或UCC同意患者的平均年龄为62.2±11.4岁;71%为女性,68%的人从未吸烟。诊断前症状的平均持续时间为8.0±9.4年。在视觉模拟量表上,平均咳嗽严重程度评分为63.7±23.2mm,莱斯特咳嗽问卷总分为10.9±4.1。可获得80例患者的GP数据,诊断前5年(指数日期)的平均总费用比对照组高3.0倍(95%CI2.3,3.9)(p<0.001)。大多数超额费用与二级保健中的就诊和程序有关。诊断后RCC或UCC相关成本降低,但仍高于对照组。
    结论:RCC或UCC的诊断需要在专科临床诊断前的5年内大量利用卫生资源。诊断后资源利用率较低,但仍高于匹配的对照组.
    BACKGROUND: Refractory and unexplained chronic cough (RCC and UCC) necessitate frequent referral for specialist evaluations, but data on healthcare resource utilisation and costs are lacking.
    METHODS: This observational study enrolled adults with RCC or UCC attending a specialist cough clinic and included a control cohort, both from North West England, matched 1:5 for age, gender and smoking history. Primary and secondary care data were obtained for the 5 years prior to and 2 years post initial clinic visit (index). The primary endpoint was the total 5-year healthcare cost to the UK NHS pre-RCC or UCC diagnosis compared to the control cohort.
    RESULTS: Mean age at index for the 200 RCC or UCC consented patients was 62.2 ± 11.4 years; 71% were female, and 68% had never smoked. Mean duration of symptoms pre-diagnosis was 8.0 ± 9.4 years. Mean cough severity score was 63.7 ± 23.2 mm at index on a Visual Analog Scale, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire total score was 10.9 ± 4.1. GP data were available for 80 patients and mean total cost over the 5 years pre-diagnosis (index date) was 3.0-fold higher (95% CI 2.3, 3.9) than in the control cohort (p < 0.001). Most excess costs were related to visits and procedures carried out in secondary care. RCC- or UCC-associated costs decreased post-diagnosis, but remained higher than those of controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of RCC or UCC requires significant health resource utilisation in the 5 years prior to a specialist clinic diagnosis. Resource utilisation was less after diagnosis, but remained higher than in a matched control cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:咳嗽是初级保健患者最常见的问题之一,并且在初级保健临床环境中得到了很大的管理。家庭医生对慢性咳嗽指南的熟悉程度以及这些指南转化为日常实践的程度尚未得到很好的描述。这项研究的目的是描述当前的诊断,治疗,以及家庭医生的转诊实践,并确定潜在有效的策略,以优化初级保健中的慢性咳嗽管理。
    方法:我们对5,000名家庭医生进行了横断面调查,以探讨诊断,治疗,与初级保健中成人慢性咳嗽管理相关的转诊实践。受访者通过纸质或在线完成了调查。结果衡量标准是自我报告的数字评级和与调查要素相关的回答。
    结果:完成了588项调查(反应率为11.8%)。大约一半(49.6%)的受访者以符合美国胸科医师学会(ACCP)慢性咳嗽指南的方式定义了慢性咳嗽。其余的意见不同,主要是关于症状表现的持续时间。受访者报告说,在提及之前试图排除自己慢性咳嗽的最常见原因(4分制的平均值为3.41,其中4是“完全描述我”),并表示希望获得更多资源来帮助他们管理和治疗慢性咳嗽。多年的实践和农村/城市环境影响了诊断和转诊实践。
    结论:家庭医生认为慢性咳嗽是一种复杂的疾病,可以并且经常在初级护理环境中进行诊断和治疗。他们还重视在复杂情况下的转介能力。我们的结果支持家庭医生提供慢性咳嗽的循证管理。
    BACKGROUND: Cough is one of the most common presenting problems for patients in primary care and is largely managed in primary care clinical settings. Family physicians\' familiarity with chronic cough guidelines and the extent to which these guidelines translate into everyday practice have not been well described. The objective of this study was to characterize current diagnosis, treatment, and referral practices among family physicians and to identify potentially impactful strategies to optimize chronic cough management in primary care.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 5,000 family physicians to explore diagnosis, treatment, and referral practices related to chronic cough management in adults in primary care. Respondents completed the survey via paper or online. The outcome measures were self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to the survey elements.
    RESULTS: 588 surveys were completed (11.8% response rate). About half (49.6%) of respondents defined chronic cough in a manner consistent with the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) chronic cough guidelines, with the rest differing in opinion primarily regarding duration of symptom presentation. Respondents reported trying to rule out most common causes of chronic cough themselves before referring (mean 3.41 on a 4-point scale where 4 is \"describes me completely\") and indicated a desire for more resources to help them manage and treat chronic cough. Years in practice and rural/urban setting influenced diagnosis and referral practices.
    CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians see chronic cough as a complicated condition that can be and is often diagnosed and treated entirely in a primary care setting. They also value the ability to refer in complex cases. Our results support that family physicians provide evidence-based management of chronic cough.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:难治性或原因不明的慢性咳嗽(RCC或UCC)难以控制,通常通过在标签外使用批准用于其他适应症的药物来治疗。
    目的:本系统文献综述(SLR)的目的是确定和表征当前已发表的RCC或UCC治疗的有效性和安全性的证据。
    方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行SLR。SLR预定义的人群包括诊断为慢性咳嗽的年龄≥18岁的患者。审查不限于任何干预类型或研究比较,也不是按时间范围。
    结果:共纳入来自19项独特试验的20篇合格出版物。这些试验中有17项是随机对照试验,大多数(14/17)是安慰剂对照。在RCC或UCC的定义中,试验之间存在相当大的差异,参与者排除和纳入标准,结果测量时间点,并评估安全性和有效性结果。几项试验发现咳嗽频率有显著改善,严重程度,或与健康相关的生活质量测量,而参与者在治疗,尽管这些改善在包括治疗后随访时间点的任何研究中都没有持续.
    结论:在没有批准的治疗方法的情况下,安慰剂仍然是潜在RCC或UCC治疗试验中最常见的对照品.已发表证据的研究间可比性受到研究设计异质性的限制,研究人群,和成果衡量标准,以及对研究规模和偏见风险的担忧。
    BACKGROUND: Refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC) is difficult to manage and is usually treated by the off-label use of drugs approved for other indications.
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify and characterize the current published body of evidence for the efficacy and safety of treatments for RCC or UCC.
    METHODS: The SLR was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The SLRs pre-defined population included patients ≥18 years of age who were diagnosed with chronic cough. The review was not restricted to any intervention type or study comparator, nor by timeframe.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 eligible publications from 19 unique trials were included. Seventeen of these trials were randomized controlled trials and most (14/17) were placebo-controlled. There was considerable variability between trials in the definition of RCC or UCC, participant exclusion and inclusion criteria, outcome measurement timepoints, and the safety and efficacy outcomes assessed. Several trials identified significant improvements in cough frequency, severity, or health-related quality of life measures while participants were on treatment, although these improvements did not persist in any of the studies that included a post-treatment follow-up timepoint.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of an approved therapy, placebo remains the most common comparator in trials of potential RCC or UCC treatments. The between-study comparability of the published evidence is limited by heterogeneity of study design, study populations, and outcomes measures, as well as by concerns regarding study size and risk of bias.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    由于诊断和治疗方面的挑战,慢性咳嗽(CC)与高医疗保健资源利用率(HCRU)相关,并有望产生重大的经济影响。本系统文献综述(SLR)旨在确定治疗的成本效益和与CC相关的经济负担的证据。电子数据库搜索得到了会议记录和卫生技术评估机构网站搜索的补充。两名独立审稿人根据预定义的纳入/排除标准评估所有引文。主要纳入标准为CC患者人群,以及与成本效益、HCRU和成本相关的结果。筛选后,确定了一项成本效益分析,以及8项报告HCRU和与CC相关的成本的研究。虽然证据有限,研究表明,CC患者比急性咳嗽患者花费更高的费用和使用更多的资源.报告的资源使用类型包括医疗保健联系人和处方,诊断测试,推荐和专家评估,和治疗使用。CC中关于HCCU和成本的文献很少,和非常有限的成本效益分析。然而,这些患者的经济负担似乎更高,如果不与普通人群进行直接比较,就很难确定总影响。预计增加的负担是诊断挑战和缺乏批准的治疗的结果。然而,在缺乏进一步数据的情况下,可以得出有限的结论。未来的研究应努力量化CC患者的HCRU和成本。
    Chronic cough (CC) is associated with high healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) due to challenges in diagnosis and treatment and is anticipated to have a substantial economic impact. This systematic literature review (SLR) sought to identify evidence on the cost-effectiveness of treatments and the economic burden associated with CC. Electronic database searches were supplemented with searches of conference proceedings and health technology assessment body websites. Two independent reviewers assessed all citations for inclusion based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Key inclusion criteria were patient population with CC, and outcomes related to cost-effectiveness and HCRU and costs. After screening, one cost-effectiveness analysis was identified, alongside eight studies reporting HCRU and costs related to CC. Though evidence was limited, studies suggest that patients with CC incur higher costs and use more resources than those with acute cough. Types of resource use reported included healthcare contacts and prescriptions, diagnostic tests, referrals and specialist evaluations, and treatment use. There is a paucity of literature on HCRU and costs in CC, and very limited cost-effectiveness analyses. The economic burden appears higher in these patients however, without direct comparison to the general population it is difficult to determine the total impact. The increased burden is expected to be a result of the challenges with diagnosis and lack of approved treatments. However, limited conclusions can be drawn in the absence of further data. Future studies should endeavor to quantify the HCRU and cost attributable to patients with CC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性咳嗽是一种累赘的疾病,其特征是持续咳嗽超过8周。慢性咳嗽可显著影响生活质量,身体机能和生产力,许多人患有持续数月甚至数年的咳嗽。患有慢性咳嗽的人通常报告持续的咳嗽冲动,由无害刺激引发的频繁咳嗽发作,这导致了咳嗽过敏的概念。
    方法:中枢和外周神经通路调节咳嗽,尽管驱动咳嗽过敏发展的机制还不完全清楚,这些神经通路的致敏作用有助于咳嗽超敏反应中的过度咳嗽触发。目前缺乏控制慢性咳嗽的有效疗法。最近的治疗进展集中在参与咳嗽外周活化的几种离子通道和受体(例如,瞬时受体电位通道,P2×3受体和电压门控钠通道)或中枢咳嗽过程(例如,神经激肽-1[NK-1]受体和烟碱乙酰胆碱受体)。
    结论:这些靶向治疗为咳嗽过敏的潜在机制提供了新的见解,并可能为慢性咳嗽患者提供新的治疗选择。在这次审查中,我们探索了临床前和临床研究,提高了我们对慢性咳嗽机制的理解,并讨论了迄今为止最有希望的靶向方法,包括P2×3受体拮抗剂和NK-1受体拮抗剂的试验。
    Chronic cough is a burdensome condition characterized by persistent cough lasting longer than 8 weeks. Chronic cough can significantly affect quality of life, physical function and productivity, with many people troubled with a cough that lasts for months or even years. People with chronic cough commonly report a persistent urge to cough with frequent bouts of coughing triggered by innocuous stimuli, which has led to the concept of cough hypersensitivity.
    Both central and peripheral neural pathways regulate cough, and although mechanisms driving development of cough hypersensitivity are not fully known, sensitization of these neural pathways contributes to excessive cough triggering in cough hypersensitivity. Effective therapies that control chronic cough are currently lacking. Recent therapeutic development has focused on several ion channels and receptors involved in peripheral activation of cough (e.g., transient receptor potential channels, P2 × 3 receptors and voltage-gated sodium channels) or central cough processing (e.g., neurokinin-1 [NK-1] receptors and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors).
    These targeted therapies provide novel insights into mechanisms underlying cough hypersensitivity and may offer new treatment options for people with chronic cough. In this review, we explore preclinical and clinical studies that have improved our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for chronic cough and discuss the most promising targeted approaches to date, including trials of P2 × 3-receptor antagonists and NK-1-receptor antagonists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:慢性咳嗽(咳嗽持续≥8周)可引起一系列躯体症状和心理社会效应,显著损害患者的生活质量。难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)和原因不明的慢性咳嗽(UCC)是具有挑战性的诊断和管理,对医疗保健系统具有重大的经济影响。
    方法:这项回顾性多中心非干预性研究旨在描述在西班牙医院门诊就诊的RCC或UCC患者的特征和健康资源消耗。在纳入研究之前,从RCC或UCC患者的病历中收集数据长达3年。
    结果:患者队列(n=196)代表慢性咳嗽人群(77.6%为女性,平均年龄58.5岁)。三分之二的患者(n=126)患有RCC。就诊频率最高的医生是肺科医师(93.4%的病人)和初级保健医师(78.6%),在三年的观察中,每位患者平均5次就诊。最常见的诊断测试是胸部X光检查(83.7%)和支气管扩张肺活量测定(77.0%)。最常见的处方治疗是质子泵抑制剂(79.6%)和呼吸药物(87.8%)。对56名(28.6%)患者进行了经验性的抗生素处方。RCC或UCC组之间的差异主要与用于治疗咳嗽相关疾病的方法有关(胃食管反流病,RCC患者的哮喘)。
    结论:RCC和UCC是西班牙医院卫生资源利用率高的原因。针对驱动慢性咳嗽的病理过程的特定治疗可以提供减少患者和医疗保健系统的相关负担的机会。
    Chronic cough (cough that persists for ≥ 8 weeks) can cause a range of physical symptoms and psychosocial effects that significantly impair patients\' quality of life. Refractory chronic cough (RCC) and unexplained chronic cough (UCC) are challenging to diagnose and manage, with substantial economic implications for healthcare systems.
    This retrospective multicenter non-interventional study aimed to characterize the profile and health resource consumption of patients with RCC or UCC who attended outpatient clinics at Spanish hospitals. Data were collected from medical records of patients with RCC or UCC for up to 3 years before study inclusion.
    The patient cohort (n = 196) was representative of the chronic cough population (77.6% female, mean age 58.5 years). Two-thirds of patients (n = 126) had RCC. The most frequently visited doctors were pulmonologists (93.4% of patients) and primary care physicians (78.6%), with a mean of 5 visits per patient over three years\' observation. The most common diagnostic tests were chest x-ray (83.7%) and spirometry with bronchodilation (77.0%). The most commonly prescribed treatments were proton pump inhibitors (79.6%) and respiratory medications (87.8%). Antibiotics were prescribed empirically to 56 (28.6%) patients. Differences between RCC or UCC groups related mainly to approaches used to manage cough-associated conditions (gastroesophageal reflux disease, asthma) in patients with RCC.
    RCC and UCC are responsible for high health resource utilization in Spanish hospitals. Specific treatments targeting the pathological processes driving chronic cough may provide opportunities to reduce the associated burden for patients and healthcare systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目标:我们评估了Gefapixant,P2X3受体拮抗剂,在近期发作(≤12个月)难治性慢性咳嗽(RCC)或无法解释的慢性咳嗽(UCC)的参与者中。
    方法:慢性咳嗽<12个月的参与者(年龄≥18岁;筛查和随机分组时100毫米咳嗽严重程度视觉模拟量表[VAS]≥40毫米)纳入本阶段3b,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组,多中心研究(NCT04193202)。参与者以1:1的比例随机分配给Gefapixant45mgBID或安慰剂,为期12周,并进行为期2周的随访。主要疗效终点是莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)总分在第12周的基线变化。监测和评估不良事件。
    结果:有415名随机和治疗的参与者(平均年龄52.5岁;中位[范围]持续时间7.5[1-12]个月):209名接受安慰剂,206名接受gefapixant45mgBID。Gefapixant与Gefapixant的统计学显着治疗差异为0.75(95%CI:0.06,1.44;p=0.034)。在第12周时,观察安慰剂组的LCQ总分相对于基线的变化.最常见的AE是味觉障碍(32%gefapixantvs.3%安慰剂参与者);严重的AE很少见(1.5%gefapixantvs.1.9%安慰剂参与者)。
    结论:与安慰剂相比,Gefapixant45mgBID在咳嗽特异性健康状况方面的改善明显优于基线,在近期发作的慢性咳嗽的参与者中。最常见的AE与味道有关,严重的AE很少见。
    We evaluated gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in participants with recent-onset (≤ 12 months) refractory chronic cough (RCC) or unexplained chronic cough (UCC).
    Participants (≥ 18 years of age; ≥ 40 mm on a 100-mm cough severity visual analog scale [VAS] at screening and randomization) with chronic cough for < 12 months were enrolled in this phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter study (NCT04193202). Participants were randomized 1:1 to gefapixant 45 mg BID or placebo for 12 weeks with a 2-week follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline at Week 12 in Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) total score. Adverse events were monitored and evaluated.
    There were 415 participants randomized and treated (mean age 52.5 years; median [range] duration 7.5 [1-12] months): 209 received placebo and 206 received gefapixant 45 mg BID. A statistically significant treatment difference of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.06, 1.44; p = 0.034) for gefapixant vs. placebo was observed for change from baseline in LCQ total score at Week 12. The most common AE was dysgeusia (32% gefapixant vs. 3% placebo participants); serious AEs were rare (1.5% gefapixant vs. 1.9% placebo participants).
    Gefapixant 45 mg BID demonstrated significantly greater improvement in cough-specific health status from baseline compared to placebo, in participants with recent-onset chronic cough. The most common AEs were related to taste and serious AEs were rare.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:最近,我们发现慢性咳嗽患者存在一种感觉失调,通过这种失调,颈部和上躯干的“咳嗽躯体点”(SPCs)机械地诱发了咳嗽冲动(UTC)或咳嗽。我们调查了未经选择的慢性咳嗽患者人群中SPCs的患病率和临床相关性。
    UNASSIGNED:从2018年到2021年,在佛罗伦萨大学医院咳嗽诊所间隔2个月的四次就诊(V1-V4)收集了317名连续慢性咳嗽患者(233名女性)的症状。参与者对咳嗽引起的干扰进行了评分(0-9改良的Borg量表)。我们试图在所有参与者中使用机械动作唤起咳嗽和/或UTC,这些参与者随后被归类为有反应(咳嗽阳性的躯体点,SPC+)或对这些操作无响应(SPC-)。慢性咳嗽与其最常见原因之间建立了关联;相应地进行治疗。
    UNASSIGNED:169例患者为SPC+,基线咳嗽评分较高(p<0.01)。在大多数患者中,治疗减少(P<0.01)咳嗽相关症状。所有患者报告在V2时咳嗽评分降低(p<0.01)(SPC+和SPC-患者分别从5.70±1.4至3.43±1.9和从5.01±1.5至2.74±1.7)。然而,而在SPC-患者中,咳嗽评分持续下降,表明在V4时咳嗽几乎完全消失(0.97±0.8),在SPC+患者中,该变量在整个随访期间保持接近V2值.
    UNASSIGNED:我们的研究表明,对SPCs的评估可能会识别出咳嗽无反应且符合特定治疗条件的患者。
    UNASSIGNED:这项工作由默克公司(意大利)的无限制资助。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently we identified in patients with chronic cough a sensory dysregulation via which the urge-to-cough (UTC) or coughing are evoked mechanically from \"somatic points for cough\" (SPCs) in the neck and upper trunk. We investigated the prevalence and the clinical relevance of SPCs in an unselected population of patients with chronic cough.
    UNASSIGNED: From 2018 to 2021, symptoms of 317 consecutive patients with chronic cough (233 females) were collected on four visits (V1-V4) 2 months apart at the Cough Clinic of the University Hospital in Florence (I). Participants rated the disturbance caused by the cough (0-9 modified Borg Scale). We attempted to evoke coughing and/or UTC using mechanical actions in all participants who were subsequently categorised as responsive (somatic point for cough positive, SPC+) or unresponsive (SPC-) to these actions. An association was established between chronic cough and its commonest causes; treatments were administered accordingly.
    UNASSIGNED: 169 patients were SPC+ and had a higher baseline cough score (p < 0.01). In most of the patients, the treatments reduced (p < 0.01) cough-associated symptoms. All patients reported a decrease (p < 0.01) in cough score at V2 (from 5.70 ± 1.4 to 3.43 ± 1.9 and from 5.01 ± 1.5 to 2.74 ± 1.7 for SPC+ and SPC- patients respectively). However, whilst in SPC- patients the cough score continued to decrease indicating virtually complete cough disappearance at V4 (0.97 ± 0.8), in SPC+ patients this variable remained close to V2 values during the entire follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that the assessment of SPCs may identify patients whose cough is unresponsive and are eligible for specific treatments.
    UNASSIGNED: This work was funded by an unrestricted grant from Merck (Italy).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性咳嗽(CC)是成年人和老年人的严重健康问题,对生活质量有重大影响。它的管理往往很麻烦,并发布了许多指导方针。尽管如此,仍有一部分病例未得到明确诊断和治疗。强烈建议不同专家之间的协调方法,但其在临床实践中的实施受到缺乏共享协议和对问题认识不足的困扰。本共识文件已得到执行,以解决这些问题。
    目的:为成人CC患者的管理制定循证建议。
    方法:由12名成员组成的全科医生专家工作组,老年病学家,肺炎专家,变态反应学家,建立了耳鼻喉科医师和胃肠病学家,以制定基于证据的建议,以诊断和治疗CC受试者。采用改进的德尔菲法达成共识,美国预防服务工作队系统被用来评价建议的强度和证据的质量。
    结果:共提出56项建议,涵盖28个主题,涉及定义和流行病学,发病机制和病因,诊断和治疗方法以及对特定护理环境的考虑。
    结论:这些建议应通过协调不同专家的专业知识来简化对CC受试者的管理。通过提供一个方便的感兴趣的主题列表,他们可能有助于确定未满足的需求和研究重点。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic cough (CC) is a burdensome health problem in adult and older people, with a major impact on quality of life. Its management is often troublesome, and many guidelines have been released. Notwithstanding, a proportion of cases still do not reach a definite diagnosis and resolutive treatment. A coordinated approach between different specialists would be highly recommended, but its implementation in clinical practice suffers from the lack of shared protocols and poor awareness of the problem. The present consensus document has been implemented to address these issues.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations for the management of adults with CC.
    METHODS: A 12-member expert task force of general practitioners, geriatricians, pneumologists, allergologists, otorhynolaringologists and gastroenterologists was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to subjects with CC. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the US Preventive Services Task Force system was used to rate the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence.
    RESULTS: A total of 56 recommendations were proposed, covering 28 topics and concerning definitions and epidemiology, pathogenesis and etiology, diagnostic and therapeutic approach along with the consideration of specific care settings.
    CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should ease the management of subjects with CC by coordinating the expertise of different specialists. By providing a convenient list of topics of interest, they might assist in identifying unmet needs and research priorities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号