USA

美国
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究邻居的建筑环境与居民健康或健康相关结果之间的关系,主要集中在使用横截面研究设计的静态特征上,或者集中在整个邻居上。这种方法使得难以理解特定的动态邻域特征如何与个体幸福感相关联。在这个分析中,我们使用匹兹堡邻里变化与健康研究(PHRESH)研究的纵向数据来评估七年(2011-2018)中发生的公共资助邻里投资之间的关系,涉及五个与健康相关的结果:粮食不安全,压力,感知到的邻里安全,邻里满意度,和饮食质量。我们还利用这个数据集来确定个人居住地和投资之间的距离,在附近测量,1英里,和½英里的水平,影响关联的大小。使用个人和年份固定效应模型,我们发现,当在邻域水平测量时,投资增加一个标准差(约1.3亿美元)与粮食不安全下降(-0.294sd)有关,增加安全性(0.231sd),在至少两波数据收集中仍在研究中的成年人中,邻里满意度(0.201sd)增加。我们还分析了具体的投资类型,发现商业投资在很大程度上推动了粮食不安全的变化,安全,和邻里满意度,而商业投资与压力的减少相关。我们发现投资与饮食质量之间没有关系。
    Research examining the relationship between a neighborhood\'s built-environment and resident health or health-related outcomes has largely either focused on static characteristics using a cross-sectional research design or focuses on the neighborhood in its entirety. Such an approach makes it difficult to understand how specific dynamic neighborhood characteristics are associated with individual well-being. In this analysis, we use longitudinal data from the Pittsburgh Research on Neighborhood Change and Health (PHRESH) studies to assess the relationship between publicly funded neighborhood investments occurring across seven years (2011-2018) on five health-related outcomes: food insecurity, stress, perceived neighborhood safety, neighborhood satisfaction, and dietary quality. We additionally utilize this dataset to determine whether the distance between an individual\'s place of residence and the investment, as measured at the neighborhood, 1 mile, and ½ mile level, effects the magnitude of associations. Using individual and year fixed effects models, we find that when measured at the neighborhood level, a one standard deviation increase in investments (about $130 million dollars) is associated with decreased food insecurity (-0.294 sd), increased safety (0.231 sd), and increased neighborhood satisfaction (0.201 sd) among adults who remain in the study for at least two waves of data collection. We also analyze specific investment types and find that commercial investments are largely driving the changes in food insecurity, safety, and neighborhood satisfaction, while business investments are correlated with the decrease in stress. We find no relationship between investments and dietary quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    护士是医疗保健系统中最大的群体。当前的护理短缺仍然是医疗保健系统中的全球挑战。加速二级护理(ABSN)计划最早由圣路易大学于1971年提出,随后在美国大力发展。其目的是培养更多的护理人才,以解决美国穷人的医疗需求。在过去的几十年里,该项目已被世界上许多国家/地区实施,以解决其国内护理问题。作为解决严重护理短缺的策略,ABSN继续快速增长。中国作为世界第二人口大国,再加上逐年衰老,对护理人才的需求,而ABSN项目正好给了中国有效的启示。因此,本文介绍了华盛顿大学护理学士学位的基本设计,总结了培训模式的特点,并从基本情况中汲取经验,培训目标,课程和评价方法。迫切需要为我国加快护理教育提供指导和借鉴。
    Nurses are the largest group in the health care system. The current care shortage remains a global challenge in the healthcare system.The accelerated second-degree nursing (ABSN) program was first proposed by the University of St.Louis in 1971 and then vigorously developed in the United States. Its purpose is to train more nursing talents to solve the medical needs of the poor in the United States. In the past few decades, this project has been carried out by many countries around the world to solve their domestic nursing problems.As a strategy to address severe care shortages, ABSN is continuing to increase rapidly.China as the world\'s second most populous country, coupled with aging year by year, the demand for nursing talents, and the ABSN project just gave China effective inspiration.Therefore, this article introduces the basic design of the bachelor\'s degree in nursing at the University of Washington, summarizes the characteristics of the training model, and draws on experience from the basic situation, training objectives, courses and evaluation methods. It is urgent to provide guidance and reference for the acceleration of nursing education in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在研究Cigna和Medicaid保险持有人之间的差异,为患有头痛的患者预约两天,而非处方药没有缓解。
    方法:这是一项横断面的“秘密购物者”类型研究,评估七个州中人口最多的三个城市,医疗补助覆盖率最低,10英里半径内的内科专家,最低评级为3星,并愿意接受新患者。
    结果:密苏里州的Medicaid和Cigna患者的平均等待期有统计学意义的差异,内布拉斯加州,还有犹他州,以及所有七个州的总平均值。此外,在新罕布什尔州,有更多的医疗保健提供者接受医疗补助而不是信诺;而在怀俄明州,医疗补助和信诺的数字几乎相等。
    结论:应纠正重大的Medicaid-Cigna接受率差异,以确保获得更高的医疗保健。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to study the disparity in Cigna and Medicaid insurance holders, to secure an appointment for a patient with a headache for two days unrelieved by over-the-counter medication.
    METHODS: This is a cross-sectional \"secret shopper\" type study, assessing the three most populated cities in seven states with the lowest Medicaid coverage and Internal Medicine specialists within a 10-mile radius, with a minimum rating of 3 stars and a willingness to accept new patients.
    RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the average waiting period for those with Medicaid and Cigna in the states of Missouri, Nebraska, and Utah, as well as the total average for all seven states. Moreover, there were more healthcare providers who accepted Medicaid rather than Cigna in New Hampshire; whereas in Wyoming, the numbers for Medicaid and Cigna were almost equal.
    CONCLUSIONS: The significant Medicaid-Cigna acceptance rate disparities should be corrected to ensure higher healthcare access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼠尾草属。11月。(描述了双翅目:Empidinae:Empidini),其中包括法属圭亚那和美国的以下五个新物种:Rhamphempisconcavasp。11月。(法国:法属圭亚那,鲁拉);R.区别。11月。(法国:法属圭亚那,鲁拉);R.mirificasp。11月。(法国:法属圭亚那,Régina);R.montreuilisp。11月。(类型物种,法国:法属圭亚那,Mitaraka,Roura,St-Georges-de-l\'Oyapock);和R.septentrionalissp。11月。(美国:马里兰州,学院公园)。该属与其他哌定属的区别在于以下特征的组合:scape和后花梗加长,长长鼻,强烈硬化与labella,只要prementum带有环,R2+3的机翼有些缩短,或多或少在翼头弯曲,R4+5未分叉,男性腹部基部淡黄色,雌性褐色至黑色,男性前生殖器段强烈修饰,腹部后或多或少向下弯曲,存在大型超触针,非常好又长的阳具。该属已得到充分说明和说明,并讨论了其独特的分离地理分布及其在Empidini部落中的系统发育关系。
    The genus Rhamphempisgen. nov. (Diptera: Empididae: Empidinae: Empidini) is described and includes the following five new species from French Guiana and the USA: Rhamphempis concavasp. nov. (France: French Guiana, Roura); R. distinctasp. nov. (France: French Guiana, Roura); R. mirificasp. nov. (France: French Guiana, Régina); R. montreuilisp. nov. (Type species, France: French Guiana, Mitaraka, Roura, St-Georges-de-l\'Oyapock); and R. septentrionalissp. nov. (USA: Maryland, College Park). The genus differs from other empidine genera by the following combination of characters: scape and postpedicel lengthened, proboscis long, strongly sclerotised with labella as long as prementum bearing annulations, wing with R2+3 somewhat shortened, more or less recurved at pterostigma, R4+5 unforked, base of abdomen yellowish in male, brownish to blackish in female, male pregenital segments strongly modified and postabdomen more or less downcurved, presence of large surstylus, very fine and long phallus. The genus is fully illustrated and keyed along with a discussion of its peculiar disjunct geographic distribution and its phylogenetic relationship within the tribe Empidini.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)药物是平衡麻醉的关键组成部分。NMB逆转方法可以包括自发逆转,sugammadex,或新斯的明和逆转策略的选择可能取决于各种因素。由于COVID-19大流行,临床实践出现了意想不到的变化,更好地了解NMB逆转趋势如何受到大流行的影响,可能有助于深入了解提供者如何看待选择NMB逆转剂的权衡。
    目的:我们旨在分析COVID-19爆发前后美国成人住院手术的NMB逆转剂使用模式,以确定与大流行相关的实践变化是否影响使用趋势。
    方法:对大型全付款人国家电子医疗保健数据库(PINCAIHealthcareDatabase)进行了回顾性纵向分析,以确定早期NMB逆转的使用模式,中间,和晚期COVID-19(EC,MC,LC,分别)时间段。在COVID-19大流行到达美国之前和之后,评估了住院手术中与NMB逆转选择相关的因素。多变量逻辑回归评估了大流行对NMB逆转的影响,为病人考虑,临床,程序,和网站特征。使用反事实框架来了解患者特征是否影响COVID-19时代患者在大流行前的治疗方式。
    结果:在2017年3月1日至2021年12月31日期间,在931个符合所有纳入标准的地点,超过320万住院患者经历了超过360万的外科手术。NMB逆转趋势显示,随着时间的推移,sugammadex的逆转稳步增加,从2018年1月起的趋势与时间呈线性关系(R2>0.99)。多变量分析显示,COVID-19后时间段对趋势影响较小,但具有统计学意义。通过COVID-19时间段的相互作用项和NMB逆转的时间趋势来衡量。相对于COVID-19之前的趋势(比值比[OR]1.008,95%CI1.003-1.014;P=.003),随后是对MC期间增加的否定(OR0.992,95%CI0.987-0.997;P<.001),在LC期间没有发现显著的相互作用(OR1.001,95%CI0.996-1.005;P=0.81)。相反,主动逆转(使用sugamadex或新斯的明)与自发逆转没有显着关联,或者趋势的变化,在EC或MC(P>0.05)期间,尽管在LC期间观察到主动逆转趋势略有下降(OR0.987,95%CI0.983-0.992;P<.001)。
    结论:我们观察到NMB活性逆转总体上呈稳定增长,特别是sugamadex与新斯的明相比,在COVID-19爆发之前和之后的一段时间。小,在COVID-19大流行期间观察到NMB逆转趋势的短暂变化,尽管这些改变与潜在的NMB逆转时间趋势无关。
    BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular blockade (NMB) agents are a critical component of balanced anesthesia. NMB reversal methods can include spontaneous reversal, sugammadex, or neostigmine and the choice of reversal strategy can depend on various factors. Unanticipated changes to clinical practice emerged due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a better understanding of how NMB reversal trends were affected by the pandemic may help provide insight into how providers view the tradeoffs in the choice of NMB reversal agents.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to analyze NMB reversal agent use patterns for US adult inpatient surgeries before and after the COVID-19 outbreak to determine whether pandemic-related practice changes affected use trends.
    METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of a large all-payer national electronic US health care database (PINC AI Healthcare Database) was conducted to identify the use patterns of NMB reversal during early, middle, and late COVID-19 (EC, MC, and LC, respectively) time periods. Factors associated with NMB reversal choices in inpatient surgeries were assessed before and after the COVID-19 pandemic reached the United States. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the impact of the pandemic on NMB reversal, accounting for patient, clinical, procedural, and site characteristics. A counterfactual framework was used to understand if patient characteristics affected how COVID-19-era patients would have been treated before the pandemic.
    RESULTS: More than 3.2 million inpatients experiencing over 3.6 million surgical procedures across 931 sites that met all inclusion criteria were identified between March 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. NMB reversal trends showed a steady increase in reversal with sugammadex over time, with the trend from January 2018 onwards being linear with time (R2>0.99). Multivariate analysis showed that the post-COVID-19 time periods had a small but statistically significant effect on the trend, as measured by the interaction terms of the COVID-19 time periods and the time trend in NMB reversal. A slight increase in the likelihood of sugammadex reversal was observed during EC relative to the pre-COVID-19 trend (odds ratio [OR] 1.008, 95% CI 1.003-1.014; P=.003), followed by negation of that increase during MC (OR 0.992, 95% CI 0.987-0.997; P<.001), and no significant interaction identified during LC (OR 1.001, 95% CI 0.996-1.005; P=.81). Conversely, active reversal (using either sugammadex or neostigmine) did not show a significant association relative to spontaneous reversal, or a change in trend, during EC or MC (P>.05), though a slight decrease in the active reversal trend was observed during LC (OR 0.987, 95% CI 0.983-0.992; P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We observed a steady increase in NMB active reversal overall, and specifically with sugammadex compared to neostigmine, during periods before and after the COVID-19 outbreak. Small, transitory alterations in the NMB reversal trends were observed during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, though these alterations were independent of the underlying NMB reversal time trends.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述和比较2020年中国和美国癌症新药和新批准药物的研发(R&D)管道,从而为相关利益相关者提供决策依据。
    中国和美国的临床试验和测试癌症新药信息分别从药物临床研究信息公开平台和试验数据库获得。从官方发布开始跟踪药物批准。在两个国家之间进行了启动试验和药物方面的亚组比较。
    2020年,在中国注册了335种癌症新药的577项试验,占所有临床药物试验的22.6%,而在美国,共捕获了678项癌症新药试验的916项试验,占总数的19.9%。相对而言,较早阶段的比例较低(76.9%对87.4%),全球(17.7%对39.0%),在中国启动的癌症药物试验中发现了前20名药物贡献(15.8%对43.2%)。对抗实体瘤的斗争在这两个国家都占据了首位,并且还观察到与癌症谱相关的癌症适应症的不同分布。与美国相比,更多的目标代理(87.5%和77.0%,P<0.001)和较少的免疫剂(30.7%vs41.6%,P<0.001)在中国进行了测试。此外,在中国和美国批准了16和18种抗癌新药,有6种(37.5%)和17种(94.4%)药物在全球范围内首次获得批准,分别。其中,至少一项加急计划批准了32种药物,根据替代终点的证据,批准了31种药物.总共涵盖了17种癌症类型,只有一种药物是针对消化系统癌症的,包括胃,肝脏,和食道癌。
    抗癌新药的研发是实质性的,2020年中美两国都取得了很大进展。中美之间的差异和差距突出表明,应该在创新药物和中国人群特有的癌症方面进行更多的抗癌药物研发。以及促进中国的全球同步研发。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe and compare the research and development (R&D) pipeline of cancer new drugs and newly approved drugs in China and the USA in 2020, thus to provide decision-making evidence for related stakeholders.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical trials and tested cancer new drugs information in China and the USA were respectively acquired from Information Disclosure Platform for Drug Clinical Studies and Trialtrove database. Drug approval was tracked from the official release. Subgroup comparison in terms of initiated trials and drugs were conducted between the two countries.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2020, 577 trials on 335 cancer new drugs were registered in China, accounting for 22.6% of all clinical drug trials, while in the USA, 916 trials on 678 cancer new drug trials were captured, accounting for 19.9% of the total. Relatively, a lower proportion of earlier phase (76.9% vs 87.4%), global (17.7% vs 39.0%), and top 20 pharmaceutics contribution (15.8% vs 43.2%) were found for cancer drug trials initiated in China. The fight against solid tumor took top billing in both countries, and the different distribution of cancer indications associated with cancer spectrum was also observed. Compared with the USA, more targeted agents (87.5% vs 77.0%, P < 0.001) and less immune agents (30.7% vs 41.6%, P < 0.001) were tested in China. In addition, 16 and 18 anticancer new drugs were approved in China and the USA, with 6 (37.5%) and 17 (94.4%) drugs being firstly approved worldwide, respectively. Among them, 32 drugs were granted by at least one expedited program, and 31 drugs were approved based on evidence from surrogate endpoints. A total of 17 cancer types were covered, and only one drug was targeted on digestive cancers, including gastric, liver, and esophageal cancers.
    UNASSIGNED: R&D of anticancer new drugs is substantial, and great progress has been made in both China and the USA in 2020. The difference and gap between China and the USA highlight that more efforts should be paid to anticancer drug R&D on innovative agents and cancers unique to Chinese populations, as well as to facilitate global synchronous R&D in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    诊断阶段是制定治疗策略和癌症控制策略的主要因素。然而,中国肝癌的分期分布研究不充分。在这项基于多中心医院的研究中,我们旨在确定中国肝癌诊断分期的分布和相关因素。
    我们纳入了2016-2017年中国10个省份的13家医院诊断为原发性肝癌的患者,涵盖了不同的地理和社会经济人群。整体的阶段分布,并按诊断时的性别和年龄进行分析。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与III-IV期疾病相关的因素。我们进一步将这些估计与美国的数据进行了比较。
    我们纳入了中国2,991例已知诊断分期的患者。诊断为I期的患者比例,II,III,IV是17.5%,25.6%,29.3%,和27.6%,分别。女性III-IV期病例比例较高[65.1%vs54.9%,调整后的优势比(OR)=1.5,95%CI:1.2,1.8]和≥60岁的人群(61.6%vs52.8%,OR=1.4,95%CI:1.2,1.6)。我们发现饮酒者和没有癌症家族史的人患III-IV期的风险增加。与美国相比,我们的研究人群中III-IV期病例比例明显较高(56.9%vs45.6%).
    中国不同人群肝癌分期诊断差异,在中国和美国之间,提示在中国提高对肝癌的认识和早期发现的必要性。
    UNASSIGNED: The stage at diagnosis is a major factor in making treatment strategies and cancer control policies. However, the stage distribution for liver cancer in China was not well studied. In this multi-center hospital-based study, we aimed to identify the distribution and factors associated with stage at diagnosis for liver cancer in China.
    UNASSIGNED: We included patients diagnosed with primary liver cancer in 13 hospitals of 10 provinces covering various geographic and socioeconomic populations during 2016-2017 in China. The stage distribution overall, and by sex and age at diagnosis were analyzed. We used logistic regression to identify the factors associated with stage III-IV disease. We further compared these estimates with data from the USA.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 2,991 patients with known stage at diagnosis in China. The proportion of patients diagnosed with stage I, II, III, and IV was 17.5%, 25.6%, 29.3%, and 27.6%, respectively. The proportion of stage III-IV cases was higher in women [65.1% vs 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.8] and those ≥ 60 years (61.6% vs 52.8%, OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.6). We found an increased risk of stage III-IV among drinkers and those without a family history of cancer. Compared to the USA, our study population had a substantially higher proportion of stage III-IV cases (56.9% vs 45.6%).
    UNASSIGNED: The disparities in liver cancer stage at diagnosis among different populations within China, and between China and the USA, imply the necessity for improving cancer awareness and early detection for liver cancer in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    HPV是美国最普遍的性传播感染,超过80%的美国人在45岁时感染了这种疾病。存在有效的HPV疫苗,并且最近被批准用于27-45岁的成年人。尽管所有年龄组的摄入量仍然很低,特别是在田纳西州,在2020年,1089种癌症归因于HPV。在2023年6月29日至8月17日之间,我们进行了一项横断面调查,以了解田纳西州2011年18至45岁成年人的HPV障碍和促进因素。我们基于以前的工具开发了我们的调查,以了解成人HPV疫苗接种的预测因素。使用描述性统计、双变量和逻辑回归分析,我们发现女性的疫苗接种率更高,18-38岁的参与者,具有高中或更高学历的参与者,西班牙裔或拉丁裔人,和参与者确定为温和或自由。这些见解强调需要考虑人口统计学差异的公共卫生干预措施,以成功提高疫苗接种率并降低与HPV相关的癌症风险。
    HPV is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection in the U.S., with more than 80% of all Americans contracting it by age 45. Effective vaccines for HPV exist and were recently approved for adults aged 27-45 years, though uptake remains low in all age groups, particularly in Tennessee where 1089 cancers were attributed to HPV in 2020. Between 29 June and 17 August 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional survey to gain insights about the barriers and facilitators of HPV in 2011 adults aged 18 to 45 years in Tennessee. We developed our survey based on previous instruments to understand predictors of HPV vaccination in adults. Using descriptive statistics and bivariate and logistic regression analyses, we found higher vaccination rates in females, participants aged 18-38 years, participants with a high school education or higher, Hispanic or Latine individuals, and participants identifying as moderate or liberal. These insights highlight the need for public health interventions that consider demographic differences to successfully increase vaccination rates and reduce HPV-associated cancer risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的关于种族对非静脉曲张性上消化道出血(NVUGIB)的影响的知识是有限的。本研究探讨了NVUGIB的病因和结局的种族差异。方法我们于2009年至2014年使用全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库进行了一项研究。NIS是美国最大的公开所有付款人住院数据库,每年住院时间超过700万。国际疾病分类,第九次修订,NVUGIB的临床修改(ICD-9-CM)代码,获得了食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)和人口统计学。感兴趣的结果是住院死亡率,住院时间(HLOS),医院总费用,入住重症监护病房(ICU),和病人的性格。组间使用卡方检验和Tukey多重比较进行分析。结果1,082,516例NVUGIB患者中,非裔美国人和美洲原住民的出血性胃炎/十二指肠炎比例最高(8.2%和4.2%,分别)和Mallory-Weiss出血(10.4%和5.4%,分别为;p<0.01)。与白人和拉丁人相比,非裔美国人在入院后24小时内完成EGD的可能性较小(45.9%对50.1%和50.4%,分别为;p<0.001)。非洲裔美国人的住院死亡率相似,拉丁裔,和白人(5.8%对5.6%对5.9%,分别为;p=0.175)。亚洲/太平洋岛民和非洲裔美国人更有可能进入ICU(9.6%和9.0%,分别为;p<0.001)。此外,与拉丁裔和白人相比,非裔美国人的HLOS更长(7.5天,6.5天和6.4天,分别为;p<0.001)。相反,与非裔美国人和白人相比,亚洲/太平洋岛民和拉丁裔人的医院总费用最高(分别为81,821美元和69,267美元,而61,484美元和53,767美元;p<0.001)。结论非裔美国人在入院后24小时内接受EGD的可能性较小,而住院时间延长则更有可能进入ICU。拉丁裔更有可能没有保险,并承担最高的医院费用。
    Background and aims Knowledge about the impact of race on non-variceal upper GI bleeding (NVUGIB) is limited. This study explored the racial differences in the etiology and outcome of NVUGIB. Methods We conducted a study from 2009 to 2014 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. NIS is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient database in the USA with more than seven million hospital stays each year. The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for NVUGIB, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and demographics were obtained. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (HLOS), total hospital charges, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and patient disposition. Analysis was conducted using Chi-square tests and Tukey multiple comparisons between groups. Results Among 1,082,516 patients with NVUGIB, African American and Native Americans had the highest proportions of hemorrhagic gastritis/duodenitis (8.2% and 4.2%, respectively) and Mallory-Weiss bleeding (10.4% and 5.4%, respectively; p<0.01). African Americans were less likely to get an EGD done within 24 hours of admission compared to Whites and Latinxs (45.9% vs 50.1% and 50.4%, respectively; p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was similar among African Americans, Latinxs, and Whites (5.8% vs 5.6% vs 5.9%, respectively; p=0.175). Asian/Pacific Islanders and African Americans were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (9.6% and 9.0%, respectively; p<0.001). Moreover, African Americans had a longer HLOS compared to Latinxs and Whites (7.5 vs 6.5 and 6.4 days, respectively; p<0.001). Conversely, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Latinx incurred the highest hospital total charges compared to African Americans and Whites ($81,821 and $69,267 vs $61,484 and $53,767, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion African Americans are less likely to receive EGD within 24 hours of admission and are more likely to be admitted to the ICU with prolonged hospital lengths of stay. Latinxs are more likely to be uninsured and incur the highest hospital costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号