Ticlopidine

噻氯匹定
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    环丙泊酚是我国开发的一种新型短效静脉麻醉药,主要由细胞色素P4502B6(CYP2B6)和尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1A9(UGT1A9)代谢。目前,没有足够的证据支持环丙泊酚和CYP2B6灭活剂之间的药物-药物相互作用.这里,建立了高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)检测方法,研究了补骨脂素和氯吡格雷对大鼠肝微粒体和大鼠体内顺丙酚代谢的影响。在大鼠和人类肝微粒体中,补骨脂素的中位抑制浓度(IC50)分别为63.31μmol·L-1和34.05μmol·L-1,对顺丙泊酚代谢表现出温和的抑制作用,氯吡格雷的IC50值分别为6.380μmol·L-1和2.565μmol·L-1,具有中等抑制作用。SD大鼠随机分为3组:补骨脂素(27mg·kg-1),氯吡格雷(7.5mg·kg-1),和相同体积的0.5%羧甲基纤维素。7天后,所有大鼠均注射2.4mg·kg-1的顺丙泊酚。与对照组相比,补骨脂素和氯吡格雷组顺丙泊酚的AUC和MRT值明显更大,而CL值显着降低。此外,补骨脂素和氯吡格雷组的康复反射(LORR)丧失持续时间分别比对照组长16.1%和23.0%,分别。总之,补骨脂素和氯吡格雷均能不同程度地抑制大鼠顺丙酚代谢,延长LORR持续时间。
    Ciprofol is a novel short-acting intravenous anaesthetic developed in China that is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A9 (UGT1A9). Currently, insufficient evidence is available to support drug‒drug interactions between ciprofol and CYP2B6 inactivators. Here, we established a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method to assess the concentration of ciprofol and investigated the effects of psoralen and clopidogrel on the metabolism of ciprofol in liver microsomes and rats. In rat and human liver microsomes, the median inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of psoralen were 63.31 μmol·L-1 and 34.05 μmol·L-1, respectively, showing mild inhibitory effects on ciprofol metabolism, whereas the IC50 values of clopidogrel were 6.380 μmol·L-1 and 2.565 μmol·L-1, respectively, with moderate inhibitory effects. SD rats were randomly divided into three groups: psoralen (27 mg·kg-1), clopidogrel (7.5 mg·kg-1), and the same volume of 0.5% carboxy methyl cellulose. After 7 days, all rats were injected with 2.4 mg·kg-1 ciprofol. Compared with the control group, the AUC and MRT values of ciprofol in the psoralen and clopidogrel groups were significantly greater, whereas the CL values were significantly lower. In addition, the durations of loss of righting reflex (LORR) in the psoralen and clopidogrel groups were 16.1% and 23.0% longer than that in the control group, respectively. In conclusion, psoralen and clopidogrel inhibit ciprofol metabolism to different degrees and prolong the duration of LORR in rats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氯吡格雷在世界范围内被广泛用作急性冠心病患者的抗血小板治疗。遗传因素影响反应中的个体差异。一些研究探索了药物反应中的多基因贡献,生成药物基因组风险评分(PgxPRS)。重要的是,这些因素在代表性不足的人群中很少被探索,比如拉丁美洲国家。识别处于高治疗血小板反应性(HTPR)风险的患者在转化医学中非常有价值。在这项研究中,我们使用了由91个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)和28个与氯吡格雷代谢相关的基因组成的自定义下一代测序(NGS)小组,分析70例患者的血小板反应性值,通过闭合时间(CT)评估。我们的结果表明SNP与HTPR和非HTPR的关联,揭示了与rs2286823的最强关联(OR:5,0;95%CI:1,02-24,48;p:0,03),rs2032582(OR:4,41;95%CI:1,20-16,12;p:0,019),和rs1045642(OR:3,38;95%CI:0,96-11,9;p:0,05)。双变量回归分析表明几个SNP与CT值显著相关,氯吡格雷反应的“替代”生物标志物。LASSO回归模型的探索性结果显示HTPR和非HTPR患者之间具有很高的辨别能力(AUC:0.955),生成的PgxPRS显示出风险评分之间的显着负相关,CT值,以及HTPR和非HTPR的状况。据我们所知,我们的研究首次利用NGS分析血小板反应性中的多基因贡献,并建立了源自LASSO模型的PgxPRS.我们的结果证明了氯吡格雷反应的多基因意义,并提供了适用于未研究人群的抗血小板治疗转化医学的见解。
    Clopidogrel is widely used worldwide as an antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary disease. Genetic factors influence interindividual variability in response. Some studies have explored the polygenic contributions in the drug response, generating pharmacogenomic risk scores (PgxPRS). Importantly, these factors are less explored in underrepresented populations, such as Latin-American countries. Identifying patients at risk of high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is highly valuable in translational medicine. In this study we used a custom next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel composed of 91 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 28 genes related to clopidogrel metabolism, to analyze 70 patients with platelet reactivity values, assessed through closure time (CT). Our results demonstrated the association of SNPs with HTPR and non-HTPR, revealing the strongest associations with rs2286823 (OR: 5,0; 95% CI: 1,02-24,48; p: 0,03), rs2032582 (OR: 4,41; 95% CI: 1,20-16,12; p: 0,019), and rs1045642 (OR: 3,38; 95% CI: 0,96-11,9; p: 0,05). Bivariate regression analysis demonstrated the significant association of several SNPs with the CT value, a \"surrogate\" biomarker of clopidogrel response. Exploratory results from the LASSO regression model showed a high discriminatory capacity between HTPR and non-HTPR patients (AUC: 0,955), and the generated PgxPRS demonstrated a significant negative association between the risk score, CT value, and the condition of HTPR and non-HTPR. To our knowledge, our study addresses for the first time the analysis of the polygenic contribution in platelet reactivity using NGS and establishes PgxPRS derived from the LASSO model. Our results demonstrate the polygenic implication of clopidogrel response and offer insights applicable to the translational medicine of antiplatelet therapy in an understudied population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗血小板治疗是影响颈动脉支架术后通畅率的重要因素。氯吡格雷是一种由二磷酸腺苷受体介导的血小板聚集抑制剂,在体内受CYP2C19基因多态性的影响。当CYP2C19基因具有非功能性突变时,编码酶的活性将减弱或丧失,直接影响氯吡格雷的代谢,最终削弱其抗血小板聚集能力。因此,基于网络药理学,分析CYP2C19基因多态性对CAS后氯吡格雷抗血小板治疗效果的影响对制定个体化临床用药方案具有重要意义。基于网络药理学分析CYP2C19基因多态性对氯吡格雷抗血小板聚集的影响。共研究了100例经神经内科确诊并需要CAS治疗的缺血性脑血管病患者。通过基因芯片对所有患者进行CYP2C19基因分型。所有患者均分为野生型(WT)组(*1/*1),杂合突变(HTM)组(CYP2C19*1/*2,CYP2C19*1/*3),和纯合突变(HMM)组(CYP2C19*2/*2,CYP2C19*2/*3和CYP2C19*3/*3)。采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)-串联质谱(MS/MS)检测不同组患者治疗前后氯吡格雷血药浓度及血浆氯吡格雷清除率(CL)。用比浊法测定不同基因型患者的血小板聚集率。治疗3个月后,分析不同组患者氯吡格雷抵抗(CR)和支架内血栓形成的发生率。结果表明,在不同的CYP2C19基因型中,HTM组的患者占大多数,而来自HTM组的患者占最少的患者。同样,HMM组患者的氯吡格雷CL低于WT组和HTM组(P<0.01)。HMM组患者的血小板抑制率明显低于WT组和HTM组(P<0.01)。WT组的CR和支架内血栓发生率明显低于HTM和HMM组(P<0.01)。提示CYP2C19基因可通过影响氯吡格雷代谢和血小板计数影响CAS后CR发生和支架内血栓形成。
    Antiplatelet therapy is an important factor influencing the postterm patency rate of carotid artery stenting (CAS). Clopidogrel is a platelet aggregation inhibitor mediated by the adenosine diphosphate receptor and is affected by CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in vivo. When the CYP2C19 gene has a nonfunctional mutation, the activity of the encoded enzyme will be weakened or lost, which directly affects the metabolism of clopidogrel and ultimately weakens its antiplatelet aggregation ability. Therefore, based on network pharmacology, analyzing the influence of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on the antiplatelet therapeutic effect of clopidogrel after CAS is highly important for the formulation of individualized clinical drug regimens. The effect of the CYP2C19 gene polymorphism on the antiplatelet aggregation of clopidogrel after CAS was analyzed based on network pharmacology. A total of 100 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease who were confirmed by the neurology department and required CAS treatment were studied. CYP2C19 genotyping was performed on all patients via a gene chip. All patients were classified into the wild-type (WT) group (*1/*1), heterozygous mutation (HTM) group (CYP2C19*1/*2, CYP2C19*1/*3), and homozygous mutation (HMM) group (CYP2C19*2/*2, CYP2C19*2/*3, and CYP2C19*3/*3). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was used to detect the blood concentration of clopidogrel and the plasma clopidogrel clearance (CL) rate in different groups of patients before and after clopidogrel treatment. The platelet aggregation rate of patients with different genotypes was measured by turbidimetry. The incidences of clopidogrel resistance (CR) and stent thrombosis in different groups after three months of treatment were analyzed. The results showed that among the different CYP2C19 genotypes, patients from the HTM group accounted for the most patients, while patients from the HTM group accounted for the least patients. Similarly, the clopidogrel CL of patients in the HMM group was lower than that of patients in the WT group and HTM group (P < 0.01). The platelet inhibition rate of patients in the HMM group was evidently inferior to that of patients in the WT group and HTM group (P < 0.01). The incidence of CR and stent thrombosis in the WT group was notably lower than that in the HTM and HMM groups (P < 0.01). These results indicate that the CYP2C19 gene can affect CR occurrence and stent thrombosis after CAS by influencing clopidogrel metabolism and platelet count.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近发现的单倍型-CYP2C:TG-决定了几种CYP2C19底物的超快速代谢。血小板抑制剂氯吡格雷需要CYP2C19介导的激活:患有不良(PM)或中等(IM)CYP2C19代谢表型的患者发生缺血事件的风险增加(与正常,NM;快速,RM;或超短,um).我们调查了CYP2C:TG单倍型是否影响氯吡格雷治疗患者的疗效/出血风险。使用氯吡格雷治疗3-6个月的成人(n=283)根据CYP2C19*2*17基因型进行CYP2C19表型分类,基于CYP2C19/CYP2C簇基因型,关于CYP2:TG单倍型的携带,并且在表型/单倍型携带水平的多个协变量上保持平衡。总的来说,45例(15.9%)患者发生缺血事件,49人(17.3%)出现出血。无论是哪种分类,在PM/IM患者中,缺血事件的发生率同样在数值上较高(21.6%,21.8%,分别)比在相互相似的NM中,RM,和UM患者(13.2-14.8%),而出血事件的发生率在数字上较低(13.1%vs.16.6-20.5%)。CYP2C中缺血事件的发生率相似:TG携带和非携带(14.1%vs.16.1%),而前者的出血发生率则稍低(14.9%vs.20.1%)。我们没有观察到表明CYP2C19/CYP2C簇基因型或CYP2C:TG单倍型对氯吡格雷临床疗效/安全性有重大影响的信号。
    A recently discovered haplotype-CYP2C:TG-determines the ultrarapid metabolism of several CYP2C19 substrates. The platelet inhibitor clopidogrel requires CYP2C19-mediated activation: the risk of ischemic events is increased in patients with a poor (PM) or intermediate (IM) CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype (vs. normal, NM; rapid, RM; or ultrarapid, UM). We investigated whether the CYP2C:TG haplotype affected efficacy/bleeding risk in clopidogrel-treated patients. Adults (n = 283) treated with clopidogrel over 3-6 months were classified by CYP2C19 phenotype based on the CYP2C19*2*17 genotype, and based on the CYP2C19/CYP2C cluster genotype, and regarding carriage of the CYP2:TG haplotype, and were balanced on a number of covariates across the levels of phenotypes/haplotype carriage. Overall, 45 (15.9%) patients experienced ischemic events, and 49 (17.3%) experienced bleedings. By either classification, the incidence of ischemic events was similarly numerically higher in PM/IM patients (21.6%, 21.8%, respectively) than in mutually similar NM, RM, and UM patients (13.2-14.8%), whereas the incidence of bleeding events was numerically lower (13.1% vs. 16.6-20.5%). The incidence of ischemic events was similar in CYP2C:TG carries and non-carries (14.1% vs. 16.1%), whereas the incidence of bleedings appeared mildly lower in the former (14.9% vs. 20.1%). We observed no signal to suggest a major effect of the CYP2C19/CYP2C cluster genotype or CYP2C:TG haplotype on the clinical efficacy/safety of clopidogrel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的主要目标是通过设计和开发速释(IR)固定剂量组合(硫酸氢氯吡格雷和阿司匹林)片剂来提高患者的依从性和便利性。拟议的组合产品利用氯吡格雷来保护对水分敏感的阿司匹林成分,增强其对大气条件的稳定性。响应面方法(设计专家与13)用于通过计算独立变量如微晶纤维素102、预糊化淀粉和羟丙基纤维素的正确组成来产生该IR片剂。使用32阶乘设计来估计这些自变量对因变量(崩解性和脆性)的响应的影响,并构造了总共九(9)个配方。制定前和制定后,质量控制参数按照药典进行研究。在优化过程中使用了系统方法,并根据自变量的更好对比准备了原型检查点批次(CPB)。进行制剂的体外分析以估计反应。脆性在0.088-1.076%w/w范围内,除F1=1.076外,均在限值范围内(NMT1.0%)。崩解时间较低为7.3±1.20,最高为24.5±1.63分钟。药物从它们的剂型中快速释放,氯吡格雷在15min后为70.42-96.82%,SD±8.71,阿司匹林在15min内为69.88-91.49%,SD±6.41,所有片剂在20min内释放超过80%。CPB片剂在压力研究15天后的稳定性结果(60±2°C和75±5%)表明API与赋形剂的良好相容性和稳定性。结论直接压片法可以优选制备具有成本效益的组合产品。还得出结论,所提出的方法可以提高阿司匹林的稳定性,并允许水性涂层系统用薄膜涂层完成产品。通过使用DesignExpert软件,可以在短时间内以最少的试验和错误选择和优化制剂的最佳组成。结果还表明,使用固定剂量的组合片剂代替个体预期对患者更方便,因此改善了患者的依从性并减少了不良作用和副作用的发生。
    The main goal of the study was to improve the compliance and convenience of patients by designing and development of an immediate release (IR) fixed-dose combination (Clopidogrel bisulphate and Aspirin) tablets. The proposed combination product utilizes Clopidogrel to protect the moisture-sensitive aspirin component, enhancing its stability against atmospheric conditions. Response-surface approach (Design Expert vs. 13) was used to generate this IR tablet by calculating the right composition of independent variables such as Microcrystalline cellulose 102, pregelatinized starch and Hydroxypropyl cellulose. 32 factorial design was used to estimate the effects of these independent variables on the responses of dependent variables (disintegration & friability) and constructed a total of nine (9) formulations. Pre and Post formulation, quality control parameters were investigated as per pharmacopeia. A systematic approach was used for the optimization process and a prototype checkpoint batch (CPB) based on the better contrast of independent variables was prepared. In vitro analysis of formulations was carried out to estimate the responses. Friability was found in the range of 0.088-1.076%w/w, except F1 = 1.076 all are within limits (NMT 1.0%). Disintegration time was recorded 7.3 ± 1.20 as lower and 24.5 ± 1.63 min was the highest. The release of drugs from their dosage form was fast and rapid, for clopidogrel after 15min was 70.42-96.82% with SD ± 8.71 and aspirin was 69.88-91.49% in 15 min with SD ± 6.41, all the tablets were released more than 80% in 20 min. The stability outcomes of CPB tablets after 15 days of stress study (60 ± 2°C and 75 ± 5%) indicated good compatibility and stability of APIs with excipients. It was concluded that the direct compression method can be preferred to prepare a combination product with cost-effectiveness. It was also concluded that the proposed methodology could increase Aspirin\'s stability and allow for an aqueous coating system to finish the product with a film coating. By using Design Expert software, the best composition of the formulation can be selected and optimized in a short period of time with minimum trial and errors. The results also demonstrated that the use of a fixed-dose combination tablet instead of the individual is expected to be more convenient to patients and thus improves patient compliance and decreases the occurrence of adverse effects and side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)或急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者中,推荐联合使用氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)用于预防继发性缺血事件。建议将质子泵抑制剂(PPI)作为这些患者的预防性治疗。由于氯吡格雷-PPI相互作用,可以考虑将他们的管理分开。然而,在ACS和AIS患者中,很少有研究调查同时使用和基于间期使用之间的结局差异.我们的研究旨在根据给药时机评估临床结果。这项研究包括ACS或AIS发病或复发的患者。纳入预期接受DAPT至少6个月且目前正在服用或计划服用埃索美拉唑的患者。患者分为第1组(间隔给药组,IA组)和第2组(同时给药组,CA组)根据埃索美拉唑和DAPT给药之间的间隔。时间间隔基于12小时。主要结局是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs)的发生,安全性结果定义为大出血,轻微出血和消化道出血及颅内出血。共有3600名患者完成了这项研究。两组患者的比例如下:CA组,99%(n=3489)和IA组,1%(n=111)。主要结局发生在IA组中0.9%的患者和CA组中1.8%的患者(P=0.51)。与IA组相比,CA组的总体出血风险没有显着差异(CA组为2.75%,IA组为2.70%)。此外,两组的安全性结局无显著差异.这个多中心,prospective,纳入ACS或AIS患者的观察性研究表明,根据用药间隔,6个月内MACCEs和出血问题的发生率无显著差异.大多数DAPT患者在现实世界的实践中同时服用PPI。
    Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin is recommended for preventing secondary ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are suggested as preventive treatment for these patients. Due to clopidogrel-PPI interactions, separating their administration might be considered. However, a paucity of studies has been conducted to investigate the outcome differences between concurrent and interval-based use in ACS and AIS patients. Our study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes based on administration timing. This study included patients with ACS or AIS onset or recurrence of within the last month. Patients who were expected to receive DAPT for at least 6 months and who were currently taking or planning to take esomeprazole were included. Patients were divided into Group 1 (interval administration group, IA group) and Group 2 (concurrent administration group, CA group) according to the interval between esomeprazole and DAPT administration. The time interval was based on 12 hours. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiocerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and safety outcomes were defined as major bleeding, minor bleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of 3600 patients completed this study. The proportions of patients in the 2 groups were as follows: CA group, 99% (n = 3489) and IA group, 1% (n = 111). The primary outcome occurred in 0.9% of patients in the IA group and 1.8% of patients in the CA group (P = .51). There was no significant distinction in the overall bleeding risk of the CA group compared to that of the IA group (2.75% in the CA group and 2.70% in the IA group). Additionally, there was no significant difference observed between the 2 groups for safety outcomes. This multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled patients with ACS or AIS demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the occurrence of MACCEs and bleeding issues within 6 months according to the medication administration interval. The majority of patients with DAPT were taking PPIs simultaneously in real-world practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血液透析是否会影响抗血小板药物的疗效存在争议。我们旨在研究血液透析对冠心病(CAD)合并终末期肾病(ESRD)患者抗血小板药物疗效的影响。连续纳入86例需要血液透析的并发ESRD的CAD患者。使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛治疗5天后,花生四烯酸(PLAA)或二磷酸腺苷(PLADP)诱导的血小板聚集,并在血液透析前后测定P2Y12反应单位(PRU)。采用倾向匹配评分法,从2439例冠心病患者中产生肾功能正常的对照组。服用阿司匹林的患者,血液透析后PLAA保持不变.服用氯吡格雷的患者,PLADP(37.26±17.04vs.31.77±16.09,p=0.029)和相应的氯吡格雷抵抗(CR)率(23[48.9%]vs.14[29.8%],p=0.022)血液透析后显著下降,尽管PRU保持不变。亚组分析表明,使用聚砜膜时PLADP显着降低(36.8±17.9vs.31.1±14.5,p=0.024)。在服用替格瑞洛的患者中,PLADP,血液透析后PRU保持不变。与肾功能正常的患者相比,ESRD患者的阿司匹林抵抗(AR)和CR发生率更高(AR:16.1%vs.0%,p=0.001;CR:48.4%vs.24.8%,p=0.024)。血液透析对阿司匹林的疗效没有负面影响,氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在ESRD伴CAD患者中的应用.与肾功能正常的患者相比,ESRD患者的AR和CR发生率更高。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03330223,2018年1月4日首次注册。
    It is controversial whether hemodialysis affects the efficacy of the antiplatelet agents. We aimed to investigate the impact of hemodialysis on efficacies of the antiplatelet agents in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients complicated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 86 CAD patients complicated with ESRD requiring hemodialysis were consecutively enrolled. After 5-day treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor, the platelet aggregations induced by arachidonic acid (PLAA) or adenosine diphosphate (PLADP), and the P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) were measured before and after hemodialysis. The propensity matching score method was adopted to generate a control group with normal renal function from 2439 CAD patients. In patients taking aspirin, the PLAA remained unchanged after hemodialysis. In patients taking clopidogrel, the PLADP (37.26 ± 17.04 vs. 31.77 ± 16.09, p = 0.029) and corresponding clopidogrel resistance (CR) rate (23 [48.9%] vs. 14 [29.8%], p = 0.022) significantly decreased after hemodialysis, though PRU remained unchanged. Subgroup analysis indicated that PLADP significantly decreased while using polysulfone membrane (36.8 ± 17.9 vs. 31.1 ± 14.5, p = 0.024). In patients taking ticagrelor, PLADP, and PRU remained unchanged after hemodialysis. ESRD patients had higher incidences of aspirin resistance (AR) and CR compared to those with normal renal function (AR: 16.1% vs. 0%, p = 0.001; CR: 48.4% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.024). Hemodialysis does not have negative effect on the efficacies of aspirin, clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ESRD patients with CAD. ESRD patients have higher incidences of AR and CR compared with those with normal renal function.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03330223, first registered January 4, 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CYP2C19基因具有多个单核苷酸多态性(SNP),这是氯吡格雷治疗反应的主要决定因素。因此,CYP2C19SNP检测对于预测氯吡格雷疗效至关重要。目前,目前临床实验室对常见CYP2C19单核苷酸多态性的常规检测尚无快速有效的方法,这在氯吡格雷治疗之前是迫切需要的。使用基于AllGlo™的定量PCR开发了一种用于CYP2C19SNP检测的新型基因分型方法,称为CyllGlo。将CyPAllGlo的性能与常用的荧光原位杂交(FISH)方法进行了比较,并通过DNA测序验证数据。使用CyPallGlo鉴定363例冠心病患者的CYP2C19多态性。单因素分析用于获得氯吡格雷在患者中的抗血小板疗效。分析CYP2C19基因多态性与氯吡格雷疗效的相关性。使用CyPARllGlo检测CYP2C19*2和CYP2C19*3等位基因具有高度特异性和快速。CYP2C19*2和CYP2C19*3的检测限约为0.07μg/μl和0.7μg/μl。CYP2C19*2和CYP2C19*3的FISH和CyPAllGlo之间的一致性分别为98.07%和99.17%。DNA测序显示CyPAllGlo的准确度为100%。整个CyPAllGlo程序的分析时间约为60分钟。单因素分析显示,氯吡格雷的抗凝效果与患者年龄有关,CYP2C19基因型,代谢表型,LDL水平。Logistic回归分析显示CYP2C19基因型和代谢表型是氯吡格雷抗血小板无效的两个危险因素。这种新型的CyPAllGlo是一种快速准确的检测CYP2C19SNP的方法。CyPAllGlo的特异性和一致性与广泛使用的DNA测序相当。这些发现为预测氯吡格雷疗效提供了有价值的快速方法,可以快速转化为冠心病治疗的个性化精准医疗。
    CYP2C19 gene has multiple single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), which is the major determinant for clopidogrel treatment responses. Therefore, CYP2C19 SNP detection is essential for predicting clopidogrel efficacy. Currently, there is still no quick and effective method for routine detection of common CYP2C19 SNPs in clinical laboratories, which is critically needed prior to clopidogrel treatment. AllGlo™ based quantitative PCR was used to develop a novel genotyping method for CYP2C19 SNP detection, termed CyPAllGlo. The performance of CyPAllGlo was compared with that of the commonly used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method, and the data was verified by DNA sequencing. CyPallGlo was used to identify CYP2C19 polymorphisms in 363 patients with coronary heart disease. The univariate analysis was used to access the antiplatelet efficacy of clopidogrel in patients. The associations between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and clopidogrel efficacy were analyzed. Using CyPAllGlo to detect CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles was highly specific and fast. The detection limit was approximately 0.07 µg/µl and 0.7 µg/µl for CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3, respectively. The consistency between FISH and CyPAllGlo were 98.07% for CYP2C19*2 and 99.17% for CYP2C19*3. DNA sequencing showed that the accuracy of CyPAllGlo was 100%. The analysis time for the whole CyPAllGlo procedure was approximately 60 min. Univariate analysis showed that the anticoagulation efficacy of clopidogrel was related to patient age, CYP2C19 genotype, metabolic phenotype, and LDL level. The logistic regression analysis showed that the genotype of CYP2C19 and metabolic phenotype was the two risk factors for clopidogrel antiplatelet ineffectiveness. This novel CyPAllGlo is a rapid and accurate method for detection of CYP2C19 SNP. The specificity and consistency of CyPAllGlo are comparable with that of widely used DNA sequencing. These findings provide valuable rapid method for predicting clopidogrel efficacy, which can be quickly translated to improve personalized precision medicine for coronary heart disease treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大多数质子泵抑制剂(PPI)抑制氯吡格雷对其活性代谢物的生物激活。关于PPI是否改变氯吡格雷降低缺血性卒中(IS)风险的有效性存在争议。因此,我们旨在检查与同时使用氯吡格雷和奥美拉唑相关的IS风险。临床上常用的PPI。我们使用2000年至2013年的台湾国家健康保险研究数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究队列包括407例诊断为急性冠脉综合征(ACS)并同时使用氯吡格雷和奥美拉唑的患者(暴露队列)。814例单独使用氯吡格雷的ACS患者(比较队列),230例ACS患者同时使用氯吡格雷和泮托拉唑(参考队列)。主要结果是事件IS。使用时间依赖性Cox回归模型得出的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)来评估同时使用氯吡格雷和奥美拉唑与IS风险之间的关系。暴露队列中IS的发生率(81.67/1000人年)明显高于对照组(57.45/1000人年),导致调整后的HR为1.39(95%CI1.03-1.74)。相比之下,暴露队列和参考队列的IS风险无显著差异(校正HR1.11;95%CI0.81~1.52).本研究表明,服用氯吡格雷和奥美拉唑的患者与IS风险增加相关。
    Most proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) inhibit the bioactivation of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. There is controversy concerning whether PPIs alter the effectiveness of clopidogrel in reducing the risk of ischemic stroke (IS). We therefore aimed to examine the risk of IS associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole, a PPI commonly used in clinical settings. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan dated from 2000 to 2013. The study cohorts comprised 407 patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and with concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole (the exposed cohort), 814 ACS patients with single use of clopidogrel (the comparison cohort), and 230 ACS patients with concurrent use of clopidogrel and pantoprazole (the reference cohort). The primary outcome was incident IS. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from the time-dependent Cox regression model were used to assess the association between concomitant use of clopidogrel and omeprazole and the risk of IS. The incidence rate of IS was significantly higher in the exposed cohort (81.67 per 1000 person-years) than in the comparison cohort (57.45 per 1000 person-years), resulting in an adjusted HR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.03-1.74). By contrast, there was no significant difference in the risk of IS between the exposed and reference cohorts (adjusted HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.81-1.52). The present study revealed that patients taking both clopidogrel and omeprazole was associated with an increased risk of IS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们旨在研究急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者肠道菌群与治疗时血小板高反应性(HTPR)之间的关系.
    我们共招募了48名AIS患者,包括19例HTPR患者和29例非高治疗血小板反应性(NHTPR)患者,还有10个健康对照。临床和实验室数据,以及粪便样本,从所有参与者中收集。使用16SrRNA测序评估肠道微生物群的组成和功能。分析了两组之间肠道菌群的差异,利用随机森林模型建立了基于肠道菌群的诊断模型。
    与NHTPR患者相比,HTPR患者表现出微生物丰富度降低。此外,HTPR患者中,未鉴定的梭菌和拉氏菌的相对丰度较低。生物功能的显著差异,比如弓形虫病,观察两组之间的差异。Ralstonia的组合,身份不明的梭菌,Mailhella,厌氧炎,Aggregatibacter对HTPR发生具有良好的预测能力(AUC=0.896)。当比较AIS患者与健康对照时,在AIS患者中观察到微生物群结构的改变,短链脂肪酸产生菌和致病菌失衡。生物功能的显著差异,如氧化磷酸化,在两组之间记录。Alloprevotella的组合,Terrisporibacter,链球菌,Proteus,和未鉴定的细菌对AIS发生表现出很强的预测能力(AUC=0.994)。
    这项研究首次揭示了AIS患者HTPR的微生物特征,并证明了特定细菌组合对HTPR发生的预测潜力。
    In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between gut microbiota and high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
    We enrolled a total of 48 AIS patients, including 19 HTPR patients and 29 non-high on-treatment platelet reactivity (NHTPR) patients, along with 10 healthy controls. Clinical and laboratory data, as well as stool samples, were collected from all participants. The composition and function of gut microbiota were assessed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Differences in the gut microbiota between the two groups were analyzed, and a diagnostic model based on the gut microbiota was established using random forest model.
    HTPR patients exhibited a decreased microbial richness compared to NHTPR patients. Additionally, the relative abundance of unidentified_Clostridia and Ralstonia was lower in HTPR patients. Significant differences in biological functions, such as toxoplasmosis, were observed between the two groups. The combination of Ralstonia, unidentified-Clostridia, Mailhella, Anaerofustis, and Aggregatibacter showed excellent predictive ability for HTPR occurrence (AUC=0.896). When comparing AIS patients with healthy controls, alterations in the microbiota structure were observed in AIS patients, with imbalances in short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria and pathogenic bacteria. Significant differences in biological functions, such as oxidative phosphorylation, were noted between the two groups. The combination of Alloprevotella, Terrisporobacter, Streptococcus, Proteus, and unidentified_Bacteria exhibited strong predictive power for AIS occurrence (AUC=0.994).
    This study is the first to uncover the microbial characteristics of HTPR in AIS patients and demonstrate the predictive potential of specific bacterial combinations for HTPR occurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号