CYP2C19 catalyzes the bioactivation of the antiplatelet prodrug clopidogrel, and CYP2C19 genotype impacts clopidogrel active metabolite formation. CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizers who receive clopidogrel experience reduced platelet inhibition and increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. This guideline is an update to the 2013 Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for the use of clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype and includes expanded indications for CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy, increased strength of recommendation for CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, updated CYP2C19 genotype to phenotype translation, and evidence from an expanded literature review (updates at www.cpicpgx.org).

BACKGROUND: After myocardial infarction, guidelines recommend higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, namely ticagrelor and prasugrel, over clopidogrel.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the contemporary use of higher-potency antiplatelet therapy in Canadian patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
METHODS: A total of 684 moderate-to-high risk NSTEMI patients were enrolled in the prospective Canadian ACS Reflective II registry at 12 Canadian hospitals and three clinics in five provinces between July 2016 and May 2018. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors independently associated with higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor use at discharge.
RESULTS: At hospital discharge, 78.3% of patients were treated with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. Among patients discharged on a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, use of higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor was 61.4%. After adjustment, treatment in-hospital with PCI (OR 4.48, 95%CI 3.34-6.03, p < .0001) was most strongly associated with higher use of higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, while oral anticoagulant use at discharge (OR 0.03, 95%CI 0.01-0.12, p < .0001), and atrial fibrillation (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.17-0.98, p = .046) were most strongly associated with lower use of higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. Use of higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor varied across provinces (range, 21.6%-78.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary Canadian practice, approximately 60% of moderate-to-high risk NSTEMI patients discharged on a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor are treated with a higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor. In addition to factors that increase risk of bleeding, interprovincial differences in practice patterns were associated with use of higher-potency P2Y12 receptor inhibitor at discharge. Opportunities remain for further optimization of evidence-based, guideline-recommended antiplatelet therapy use.

非血运重建是急性冠状动脉综合征（ACS）患者的治疗选择之一，与接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）的患者相比，非血运重建ACS患者不良心血管事件风险更高、预后更差。自2009年我国《急性冠状动脉综合征非血运重建患者抗血小板治疗的中国专家共识》发布以来，近年在该疾病领域积累了较多新的临床证据。该共识结合我国国情及实践，对ACS（包括特殊类型ACS）非血运重建患者抗血小板治疗提出建议，以期推进我国ACS非血运重建患者抗血小板治疗的规范化管理。.

暂无摘要。

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is the treatment of choice for the prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and for those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. The availability of different oral P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) has enabled physicians to contemplate switching among therapies because of specific clinical scenarios. The recent introduction of an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (cangrelor) further adds to the multitude of modalities and settings in which switching therapies may occur. In clinical practice, it is not uncommon to switch P2Y12 inhibitor, and switching may be attributed to a variety of factors. However, concerns about the safety of switching between these agents have emerged. Practice guidelines have not fully elaborated on how to switch therapies, leaving clinicians with limited guidance on when and how to switch therapies when needed. This prompted the development of this expert consensus document by key leaders from North America and Europe with expertise in basic, translational, and clinical sciences in the field of antiplatelet therapy. This expert consensus provides an overview of the pharmacology of P2Y12 inhibitors, different modalities and definitions of switching, and available literature and recommendations for switching between P2Y12 inhibitors.

Pharmacogenetic testing for clinical applications is steadily increasing. Correct and adequate use of pharmacogenetic tests is important to reduce unnecessary medical costs and adverse patient outcomes. This document contains recommended pharmacogenetic testing guidelines for clinical application, interpretation, and result reporting through a literature review and evidence-based expert opinions for the clinical pharmacogenetic testing covered by public medical insurance in Korea. This document aims to improve the utility of pharmacogenetic testing in routine clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy management in patients with previously placed coronary stents.
METHODS: Retrospective medical record review.
METHODS: Academic medical center.
METHODS: A total of 1891 surgical cases performed at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in 2012 were evaluated using a perioperative database. Of these, 161 had complete data records that were evaluated using 2 evidence-based and expert opinion-supported protocols.
METHODS: N/A.
METHODS: This study is meant to evaluate perioperative antiplatelet management decisions in patients with coronary stents.
RESULTS: Management decisions were consistent with guidelines regarding antiplatelet therapy in 13% (21/161) of patients. Of the 87% (140/161) of cases where decisions were not consistent, 88% (123/140) were due to discontinuing aspirin preoperatively when there was not a high risk of surgical bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed suboptimal adherence to current perioperative antiplatelet management guidelines in patients with coronary stents. The lack of adherence to current guidelines is concerning and could be used to support the notion of an anesthesiologist-led Perioperative Surgical Home.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend use of evidence-based medications in patients discharged after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Yet the current rates of adherence in many eastern European countries are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 6month outpatient follow-up after ACS is associated with recommended rates of medication adherence in Montenegro.
METHODS: A prospective analysis was conducted in 585 ACS patients confirmed to be alive after ACS at 6month follow-up. The study was undertaken between 2012 and 2015, from 9 International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Transitional Countries (ISACS-TC) hospitals in the Montenegro. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant care, defined as 100% compliance with 5 medications: aspirin, clopidogrel, beta-blockers, and statins in ACS patients, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers [ACEI/ARB] for the subset of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, as assessed by an ejection fraction less than 40% at discharge. In addition to the composite end point, the achievement of each single treatment measure was analyzed. Multivariate predictors of long-term medication adherence were also identified.
RESULTS: Guideline-concordant care (GCC) at discharge increased from 2012 to 2015 (adjusted OR for increase 1.51; CI 0.88-2.52). GCC over 6months was adhered in 73% of patients. In patients who did not achieve GCC, adherence was persistently high with 92.3% for aspirin, 91.3% for statins and 72% for ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). Adherence was lower for clopidogrel (57.7%) and beta-blockers (64.4%). After adjusting for demographic and clinical differences, in-hospital referral to PCI and ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were associated with greater medication adherence at 6month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In Montenegro, long-term adherence to evidence-based medication after ACS is high. Adherence to guideline-recommended therapies increased over time with participation to the ISACS-TC. The lower achievement of GCC in patients treated medically and in those with non-ST-segment elevation ACS needs particular attention.

The wide availability of drugs effective in reducing cardiovascular events and the use of myocardial revascularization have greatly improved the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. However, the combination of antithrombotic drugs to be administered before the exact knowledge of the coronary anatomy and before the consequent therapeutic strategy can, on one hand, allow to anticipate an optimal treatment but, on the other hand, may expose the patient to a bleeding risk not always necessary. In patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with an indication to primary angioplasty, the administration of unfractionated heparin and aspirin is considered the pre-procedural standard treatment. The upstream administration of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor, even if not supported by randomized controlled trials, appears reasonable in view of the very high likelihood of treatment with angioplasty. In patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, in which it is not always chosen an invasive strategy, the occurrence of bleeding can significantly weigh on prognosis, even more than the theoretical benefit of pretreatment. Fondaparinux is the anticoagulant with the most favorable efficacy/safety profile. Antiplatelet pretreatment must be selective, guided by the ischemic risk conditions, the risk of bleeding and the time schedule for coronary angiography.In patients with stable coronary artery disease, generally treated with aspirin, pretreatment with clopidogrel is advisable in case of already scheduled angioplasty, and it appears reasonable in case of high likelihood, at least in patients at low bleeding risk. In patients candidate to surgical revascularization, aspirin is typically maintained and the oral P2Y12-inhibitor discontinued, with i.v. antiplatelet drug bridging in selected cases.Anti-ischemic drugs are useful in controlling symptoms, but they have no specific indications with regard to revascularization procedures. Statins showed protective effects on periprocedural damage and late clinical events, when administered early. Although randomized data are lacking, it seems reasonable their pre-procedural administration, due to potential advantages without significant adverse effects.

暂无摘要。