Spinal

脊柱
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    妊娠期自发性脊髓硬膜下-硬膜外血肿很少见。
    一名29岁的GravidaII患者出现呕吐,头痛,进行性轻瘫.最初的非对比脑计算机断层扫描和凝血功能均为阴性。第二天,脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)显示有C7-T4硬膜外血肿;对比研究显示无伴随血管病变.在第3天,她接受了剖宫产,然后进行了C3-T1椎板切除术。她的感觉和括约肌功能在术后第2天恢复,但在术后6个月,她继续表现出3/5的轻瘫。
    妊娠合并急性轻瘫患者应进行脊柱STATMRI筛查,以寻找硬膜外/硬膜下血肿。
    UNASSIGNED: Spontaneous spinal subdural-epidural hematoma during pregnancy is rare.
    UNASSIGNED: A 29-year-old gravida II patient experienced the onset of vomiting, headache, and progressive paraparesis. The initial non-contrast brain computed tomography and coagulation profiles were negative. The next day, the spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a C7-T4 epidural hematoma; contrast studies revealed no accompanying vascular lesions. On day 3, she underwent a cesarean delivery followed by a C3-T1 laminectomy. Her sensory and sphincteric function returned on postoperative day 2, but at 6 postoperative months, she continued to exhibit a 3/5 paraparesis.
    UNASSIGNED: Pregnant patients with acute paraparesis should undergo STAT MRI screening of the spine to look for epidural/subdural hematomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    涉及在同一解剖部位同时出现两种形态和基因组不同的肿瘤的碰撞肿瘤在中枢神经系统(CNS)中非常罕见。
    我们报告了一例中枢神经系统碰撞肿瘤,包括慢性淋巴细胞白血病和粘液乳头状室管膜瘤,患者为一名77岁男性,伴有急性神经系统衰退。假定代表白血病浸润,进行紧急椎板切除术以进行组织诊断和脊髓减压,揭示了意想不到的室管膜成分。
    这个案例突出了处理中枢神经系统碰撞肿瘤固有的诊断和治疗挑战,特别是当一个肿瘤是血液学的。
    UNASSIGNED: Collision tumors involving the co-occurrence of two morphologically and genomically distinct neoplasms in the same anatomical site are exceptionally rare in the central nervous system (CNS).
    UNASSIGNED: We report a unique case of a CNS collision tumor comprising chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myxopapillary ependymoma in a 77-year-old male with acute neurological decline. Presumed to represent leukemic infiltration, urgent laminectomy was pursued for tissue diagnosis and spinal cord decompression, revealing the unexpected ependymal component.
    UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges inherent to managing collision CNS tumors, particularly when one neoplasm is hematological.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述在先前进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除术并融合(ACDF)的患者中,颈椎硬膜外注射(CEI)的灾难性并发症。
    在最低程度的镇静下进行C7-T1的层间CEI。
    右偏瘫,弥漫性感觉障碍,手术后立即描述触觉异常性疼痛。CEI后24小时,MRI显示从C3-T3延伸的脊髓中T2信号增加,T1信号减少.术后ACDF改变,颈交叉韧带异常,来自连续CEI的重复性微创伤,硬膜外腔的损害可能会使抵抗技术的丧失复杂化,并增加硬脑膜穿刺和内在脊髓损伤的风险。
    颈椎解剖学知识,ACDF的生物力学意义,韧带炎症,术前影像回顾,和围手术期患者反馈是有价值的见解,可以减轻严重不良事件的风险.
    UNASSIGNED: Describe a catastrophic complication of cervical epidural injection (CEI) in a patient with prior anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF).
    UNASSIGNED: Interlaminar CEI at C7-T1 was performed under minimal sedation.
    UNASSIGNED: Right hemiparesis, diffuse dysesthesia, and tactile allodynia were immediately described after the procedure. 24 hours after CEI, an MRI showed an increased T2 signal and decreased T1 signal in the spinal cord extending from C3-T3. Postsurgical ACDF changes, cervicovertebral ligament anomalies, repetitive microtrauma from serial CEI\'s, and epidural space compromise may have complicated the loss of resistance technique and increased the risk for dural puncture and intrinsic cord injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Knowledge of cervical spinal anatomy, biomechanical implications of ACDF, ligamentous inflammation, pre-operative image review, and perioperative patient feedback are valuable insights that may mitigate the risk of severe adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腰椎射频神经切开术(LRFN)通过凝结内侧支神经以破坏伤害性信号通路,有效减轻了关节突关节介导的疼痛。多裂纤维的伴随神经支配导致人们担心LRFN可能会增加某些先前存在脊柱病变的患者的节段不稳定性并加速退行性变化。很少有文献评估LRFN是否会增加成人脊柱侧凸患者的脊柱弯曲度。
    将接受LRFN的成人脊柱侧凸患者的腰骶Cobb角进展率与自然史预期的0.83±1.1°的年进展率进行比较。
    横断面研究。
    连续诊断为成人脊柱侧凸的患者接受了LRFN治疗关节突关节相关的下腰痛。患者人口统计学,LRFN程序详细信息,并从电子病历中收集证实脊柱侧凸的射线照片。使用LRFN前后的X射线照片来计算Cobb角进展的年平均速率。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和线性回归模型分析数据。
    60例患者(平均年龄69.2±11.6岁;70.0%为女性)符合标准并纳入分析。LRFN后的平均影像学随访时间为35.0±22.7个月。平均Cobb角进展为每年0.54±3.03°,与已知的每年0.83±1.1°的自然进展率没有显着差异。没有包含的协变量(体重指数,LRFN侧向性,和神经支配水平的数量)与年平均Cobb角进展率显着相关。
    我们的结果表明,LRFN对成人脊柱侧凸患者的Cobb角进展率没有明显影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy (LRFN) effectively alleviates zygapophyseal joint-mediated pain by coagulating medial branch nerves to disrupt nociceptive signaling pathways. The concomitant denervation of multifidus fibers has led to concern that LRFN may increase segmental instability and accelerate degenerative changes in patients with certain pre-existing spinal pathologies. There is a paucity of literature evaluating whether LRFN increases the progression of spinal curvature in patients with adult scoliosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Compare the lumbosacral Cobb angle progression rate in patients with adult scoliosis who underwent LRFN to the annual progression rate of 0.83 ± 1.1° expected by natural history.
    UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients diagnosed with adult scoliosis who underwent LRFN to treat zygapophyseal joint-related low back pain were identified. Patient demographics, LRFN procedure details, and radiographs confirming scoliosis were collected from electronic medical records. Pre- and post-LRFN radiographs were used to calculate the average annual rate of Cobb angle progression. Data were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a linear regression model.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty patients (mean age 69.2 ± 11.6 years; 70.0 % female) met the criteria and were included in the analyses. The mean time to radiographic follow-up was 35.0 ± 22.7 months post-LRFN. The average Cobb angle progression was 0.54 ± 3.03° per year and did not differ significantly from the known natural progression rate of 0.83 ± 1.1° per year. None of the included covariates (body mass index, LRFN laterality, and number of levels denervated) were significantly associated with the average annual Cobb angle progression rate.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results suggest that LRFN has no appreciable effect on the rate of Cobb angle progression in patients with adult scoliosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估微波消融(MWA)和椎体增强(VA)联合治疗后壁缺损的脊柱转移瘤的疗效和安全性。
    对67例患者(42例男性,25名妇女)患有疼痛性脊柱转移和后壁缺损,接受MWA联合VA治疗。在这些患者中,52个椎骨没有硬膜外侵犯,33个椎骨轻度侵犯,但没有压迫脊髓。通过比较手术前和随访期间的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分来确定手术有效性。
    该手术在所有患者中在技术上都是成功的。平均VAS评分从手术前的6.85±1.81下降到24h时的3.27±1.97,1周时1.96±1.56,4周时1.84±1.50,12周时1.73±1.45,术后24周时为1.71±1.52(p<0.01)。术后平均ODI评分低于手术前(p<0.001)。2例患者发生短暂性神经损伤(SIR分类D),无症状骨水泥(SIR分类A)的发生率为43.5%(37/85)。
    MWA联合VA是一种有效且安全的治疗伴后壁缺损的疼痛性脊柱转移瘤的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined microwave ablation (MWA) and vertebral augmentation (VA) in the treatment of spinal metastases with posterior wall defects.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was conducted for 67 patients (42 men, 25 women) with painful spine metastases and posterior wall defects who underwent MWA combined with VA. Among these patients, 52 vertebrae had no epidural invasion and 33 had mild invasion but did not compress the spinal cord. Procedural effectiveness was determined by comparing visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores before the procedure and during the follow-up period.
    UNASSIGNED: The procedure was technically successful in all patients. The mean VAS score declined significantly from 6.85 ± 1.81 before the procedure to 3.27 ± 1.97 at 24 h, 1.96 ± 1.56 at 1 week, 1.84 ± 1.50 at 4 weeks, 1.73 ± 1.45 at 12 weeks, and 1.71 ± 1.52 at 24 weeks post-procedure (p < 0.01). The mean ODI score was lower post-procedure than before the procedure (p < 0.001). Transient nerve injury occurred in two patients (SIR classification D), and the incidence of asymptomatic bone cement (SIR classification A) was 43.5% (37/85).
    UNASSIGNED: MWA combined with VA is an effective and safe treatment for painful spine metastases with posterior wall defects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较在剖宫产产妇中使用去氧肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素对脐动脉和静脉的pH和碱过量(BE)的影响。
    方法:研究方案在INPLASY中注册。独立研究人员搜索了Ovid-Medline,Ovid-EMBASE,和Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)数据库和GoogleScholar相关随机对照试验(RCTs)。这项研究的主要结果是脐动脉(UA)或脐静脉(UV)pH值作为出生时的新生儿状况,次要结局是UA或UVBE作为脐带pH测量的额外预后价值。
    结果:没有证据表明去氧肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素在总体上有差异,UA,和紫外线pH(平均差异(MD)-0.001,95%置信区间(CI)-0.004至0.007;MD0.000,95CI-0.004至0.004;和MD0.002,95CI-0.013至0.017)。也没有证据表明去氧肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素之间的总体差异,UA,和UVBE(MD0.096,95%CI-0.258至0.451;MD0.076,95CI-0.141至0.294;和MD0.121,95CI;-0.569至0.811)。荟萃回归显示,脐动脉或静脉等因素,输液方法,单身或双胞胎,每个研究的产妇数量对UApH值没有影响,UVpH值,UABE,或UVBE。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。
    结论:对于脐带pH和BE,没有证据表明去氧肾上腺素和去甲肾上腺素之间存在差异。亚组分析和荟萃回归也没有显示出差异的证据。
    BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of using phenylephrine or norepinephrine on the pH and base excess (BE) of the umbilical artery and vein in parturients undergoing cesarean section.
    METHODS: The study protocol was registered in INPLASY. Independent researchers searched Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases and Google Scholar for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome of this study was the umbilical artery (UA) or umbilical vein (UV) pH as neonatal condition at birth, and the secondary outcome was the UA or UV BE as an additional prognostic value over the measurement of umbilical pH.
    RESULTS: There was no evidence of a difference between phenylephrine and norepinephrine for overall, UA, and UV pH (mean difference (MD) -0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.004 to 0.007; MD 0.000, 95%CI -0.004 to 0.004; and MD 0.002, 95%CI -0.013 to 0.017). There was also no evidence of a difference between phenylephrine and norepinephrine for overall, UA, and UV BE (MD 0.096, 95% CI -0.258 to 0.451; MD 0.076, 95%CI -0.141 to 0.294; and MD 0.121, 95%CI; -0.569 to 0.811). A meta-regression showed that factors such as umbilical artery or vein, infusion method, single or twin, and the number of parturients per study had no effect on the UA pH, UV pH, UA BE, or UV BE. No evidence of publication bias was detected.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of a difference between phenylephrine and norepinephrine for umbilical pH and BE. A subgroup analysis and meta-regression also did not show evidence of differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:昂丹司琼,选择性5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂,已被证明可有效预防选择性剖宫产术的脊髓性低血压。
    方法:将138例择期剖宫产产妇随机分为三组。组ONDA4和ONDA8,分别,在100毫升生理盐水中接受4和8毫克的昂丹司琼,脊髓麻醉前用1.7毫升罗哌卡因0.75%和15微克芬太尼,而对照组接受等量生理盐水。到达时记录无创血压和心率,脊髓注射前后,此后每分钟,持续10分钟的时间,以及总剂量的去氧肾上腺素(mcg)或麻黄碱(mg)。脊髓麻醉分别在T4水平和Bromage3量表达到感觉和运动阻滞所需的时间,以及回归到T7水平和Bromage1量表。产妇恶心/呕吐或发抖,脐动脉pH,并记录1分钟和5分钟的新生儿Apgar评分。
    结果:两组在收缩压、舒张压,心率(分别为p=0.355,p=0.550,p=0.474),去氧肾上腺素或麻黄碱的剂量,(p=0.920,p=0.142),块达到T4(p=0.889)和Bromage量表3(p=0.269)的时间,或回归到T7(p=0.273)和Bromage量表1(p=0.392),恶心/呕吐的发生率(p=0.898/p=0.365),脐动脉pH(p=0.739),新生儿Apgar评分在1和5分钟(分别为p=0.936和p=0.907)。
    结论:我们的结果显示两种不同剂量的昂丹司琼没有显著作用,在预防产妇低血压方面,罗哌卡因腰麻用于剖宫产。
    BACKGROUND: Ondansetron, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, has been proven to be effective in the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension for elective cesarean section.
    METHODS: A total of 138 primigravida parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section were randomly assigned to three groups. Groups ONDA4 and ONDA8, respectively, received 4 and 8 mg of ondansetron in 100 mL normal saline, before spinal anesthesia with 1.7 mL ropivacaine 0.75% and 15 mcg of fentanyl, whereas the CONTROL group received an equal volume of normal saline. Noninvasive blood pressure and heart rate were recorded upon arrival, before and after spinal injection, and thereafter every minute for a time period of 10 minutes along with total doses of phenylephrine (mcg) or ephedrine (mg). Time required for the spinal anesthesia to achieve a sensory and motor block at the T4 level and Bromage 3 scale respectively, as well as to regress to the T7 level and a Bromage 1 scale were noted. Maternal nausea/vomiting or shivering, umbilical artery pH, and neonatal Apgar score at 1 and 5 min were also recorded.
    RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate (p=0.355, p=0.550, p=0.474 respectively), doses of phenylephrine or ephedrine, (p=0.920, p=0.142 respectively), time for the block to reach T4 (p=0.889) and Bromage scale 3 (p=0.269), or to regress to T7 (p=0.273) and Bromage scale 1 (p=0.392), the incidence of nausea/vomiting (p=0.898/p=0.365), umbilical artery pH (p=0.739), neonatal Apgar score at 1 and 5 min (p=0.936 and p=0.907 respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed no significant effect of two different doses of ondansetron, in preventing maternal hypotension, following spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine for cesarean section.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的脊柱麻醉是下段剖宫产(LSCS)患者的基石,提供更快的起效和高块密度等优点。左旋布比卡因,以其高效和长效特性而闻名,起病较慢。评价鞘内注射芬太尼或咪达唑仑作为左布比卡因辅助用药的安全性。这项研究旨在比较选择性剖宫产术中添加0.5%高压左布比卡因的芬太尼或咪达唑仑提供的术后镇痛时间。次要目标包括评估感觉和运动阻滞的发作和持续时间以及恶心和呕吐的发生率。确定更有效的佐剂将有助于优化脊髓麻醉方案,改善术后结果,并提高患者的舒适度和恢复。方法本研究在SRM医学院附属医院和研究中心进行,钦奈,印度,超过六个月(2023年5月1日至2023年10月1日)。在一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验中,共有90例接受择期LSCS的患者接受了脊髓麻醉。患者被分为三组:A组接受左旋布比卡因和芬太尼,B组接受左布比卡因和咪达唑仑,C组给予左旋布比卡因生理盐水。块特性,术后镇痛,血液动力学稳定性,并对并发症进行了评估。在指定的时间点进行评估:术中,前30分钟每5分钟,接下来的一个小时每10分钟,每两个小时六个小时,术后每4小时到24小时。统计分析使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)。结果与A组和C组(均为145秒)相比,B组(左布比卡因联合咪达唑仑)表现出更短的感觉阻滞开始时间(88秒)(p<0.001)。A组(左旋布比卡因加芬太尼)的最大运动阻滞时间(p=0.045)短于B组和C组。A组(127.5分钟)的感觉阻滞持续时间明显长于B组(60分钟)和C组(69分钟)(p<0.001)。与B组(147分钟)和C组(177分钟)相比,A组(251分钟)的运动阻滞持续时间也延长(p=0.045)。A组的第一次镇痛需求延迟(248分钟),而B组(115分钟)和C组(90分钟)(p<0.001)需要更频繁的镇痛。A组术后恶心呕吐发生率较高。结论咪达唑仑加速感觉阻滞的发作,而芬太尼延长麻醉持续时间,而不显著影响运动阻滞。芬太尼延迟了第一次镇痛需求,而咪达唑仑减少了术后恶心,呕吐,颤抖着。
    Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia stands as a cornerstone for patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section (LSCS), offering advantages like faster onset and high block density. Levobupivacaine, known for its high potency and long-acting nature, has a slower onset. The safety of intrathecal fentanyl or midazolam is evaluated as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in parturients. This study aims to compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by fentanyl or midazolam added to 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine in elective cesarean sections. Secondary objectives include evaluating the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade and the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Identifying the more effective adjuvant will help optimize spinal anesthesia protocols, improve postoperative outcomes, and enhance patient comfort and recovery. Methods This study was conducted at SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chennai, India, over six months (May 1, 2023, to October 1, 2023). A total of 90 patients undergoing elective LSCS received spinal anesthesia in a prospective randomized double-blinded controlled trial. Patients were allocated to three groups: Group A received levobupivacaine with fentanyl, Group B received levobupivacaine with midazolam, and Group C received levobupivacaine with normal saline. Block characteristics, postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and complications were assessed. Assessments were conducted at specified time points: intraoperatively, every five minutes for the first 30 minutes, every 10 minutes for the next hour, every two hours for six hours, and every four hours up to 24 hours postoperatively. Statistical analysis utilized one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Group B (levobupivacaine with midazolam) exhibited a shorter time to sensory block onset (88 seconds) compared to Groups A and C (both 145 seconds) (p < 0.001). Group A (levobupivacaine with fentanyl) showed a shorter time to maximum motor block (p = 0.045) than Groups B and C. The sensory block duration was significantly longer in Group A (127.5 minutes) compared to Group B (60 minutes) and Group C (69 minutes) (p < 0.001). Motor block duration was also prolonged in Group A (251 minutes) compared to Group B (147 minutes) and Group C (177 minutes) (p = 0.045). The first analgesic requirement was delayed in Group A (248 minutes), whereas Groups B (115 minutes) and C (90 minutes) (p < 0.001) required more frequent analgesia. Group A experienced a higher incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Midazolam accelerated sensory block onset, while fentanyl prolonged anesthesia duration without significantly affecting motor block. Fentanyl delayed the first analgesic requirement, whereas midazolam reduced postoperative nausea, vomiting, and shivering.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尚未评估在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)期间鞘内(IT)地塞米松的使用。没有汇总数据可用于决定SAB期间IT地塞米松的最佳方案,无论手术类型如何。它的剂量不确定,有效性,和安全,并需要就其使用建立明确的指导方针。我们的目的是评估SAB期间使用IT地塞米松的有效性和安全性。我们进行了荟萃分析(PROSPERO,CRD42022304944)的试验包括在SAB下接受各种外科手术的患者。患者同时接受IT地塞米松作为脊髓局部麻醉药的佐剂。分析的结果包括感觉和运动效应以及不良和/或有益的副作用。根据使用的不同剂量计划进行亚组分析。试验序贯分析(TSA)用于估计每个结果所需的样本量信息(RIS)。该分析包括18项研究(2531名参与者)。在重型布比卡因中添加IT地塞米松(4-8mg)可有效延长感觉阻滞的持续时间(平均差,MD=63.8分钟;[95%置信区间,CI,33.1-94.5],P<0.0001),两段回归时间(MD=20.1[95%CI,0.96-39.2],P=0.04)和首次抢救镇痛时间(MD=143.3[95%CI,90.3-196.0],P=0.001)。亚组分析显示,8mg剂量比4mg的感觉和镇痛效果更好。地塞米松对运动阻滞持续时间的影响尚无定论。此外,脊髓麻醉相关低血压的风险比(RR=0.74[95%CI,0.6-0.9],P=0.0003)和恶心/呕吐(RR=0.62[95%CI,0.41-0.93],地塞米松组P=0.02)。对于感觉阻滞等结果,镇痛,低血压,在TSA期间达到了所需的信息大小。总之,它地塞米松,用作脊髓局部麻醉的佐剂,尤其是8毫克的剂量,增加感觉阻滞持续时间和第一次抢救镇痛药的请求时间。SAB引起的副作用,如低血压,恶心,使用IT地塞米松时呕吐较少。然而,需要进一步研究以得出有意义的安全性结论。
    The use of intrathecal (IT) dexamethasone during subarachnoid block (SAB) has not been evaluated. There are no pooled data available to decide on the optimal regimen of IT dexamethasone during SAB, irrespective of the type of surgery. There is uncertainty about its dosage, effectiveness, and safety, and a need to establish clear guidelines on its use. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of use of IT dexamethasone during SAB. We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO, CRD42022304944) of trials that included patients who underwent a variety of surgical procedures under SAB. Patients received concomitant IT dexamethasone as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetics. The analyzed outcomes included sensory and motor effects as well as adverse and/or beneficial side effects. Subgroup analysis was planned based on different doses used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to estimate the required sample size information (RIS) for each outcome. Eighteen studies (2531 participants) were included in this analysis. Addition of IT dexamethasone (4-8 mg) to heavy bupivacaine effectively prolonged the duration of sensory blockade (mean difference, MD = 63.8 minutes; [95% confidence interval, CI, 33.1-94.5], P < 0.0001), two-segment regression time (MD = 20.1[95% CI, 0.96-39.2], P = 0.04) and first rescue analgesic time (MD = 143.3 [95% CI, 90.3-196.0], P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed superior effects of 8 mg dose over 4 mg for sensory and analgesic effects. The effect of dexamethasone on duration of motor blockade was inconclusive. Additionally, lower risk ratios (RRs) were recorded for spinal anesthesia-related hypotension (RR = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9], P = 0.0003) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.93], P = 0.02) in the dexamethasone group. For outcomes such as sensory blockade, analgesia, and hypotension, the required information size was reached during TSA. In conclusion, IT dexamethasone, used as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetic, especially at the dose of 8 mg, increases sensory blockade duration and the time for request of the first rescue analgesic. SAB-induced side effects such as hypotension, nausea, and vomiting are lesser with the use of IT dexamethasone. However, further studies are necessary to draw meaningful conclusions on its safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脊椎麻醉(SA)是在腹骨盆和下肢手术中进行适当神经阻滞的常规方法。与全身麻醉相比,SA显著减少了围手术期并发症。高压型盐酸布比卡因(HB)可更有效地诱导脊髓麻醉,而危及生命的不良反应(例如围手术期血流动力学变化和呼吸抑制)的发生率较低。需要更多的研究来确定提供足够麻醉的最佳剂量,同时减少每次外科手术的不良反应。
    方法:这项双盲随机临床试验比较了(12.5mg,15mg,20mg)剂量的HB-布比卡因在择期下肢骨科手术中的应用。使用块随机化,我们将60名参与者分配到3个研究组(n=20).利用相同的麻醉诱导方案,结果变量假定并测量为不良反应的发生率(低血压,焦虑,心动过缓,恶心和呕吐(N/V),通气不足,并降低O2饱和度),以及控制不必要反应的干预要求。解决这个问题,围手术期测量结果变量10次.单因素方差分析测试,chi2测试,适当时使用带有Bonferroni调整的重复测量ANOVA检验。
    结果:我们发现低血压的发生率(P值:0.02)和N/V(P值<0.001)与HB-布比卡因的剂量有关。相反,我们的研究结果表明呼吸暂停的发生率,心动过缓,和低通气组之间没有显著的剂量依赖性模式.重复测量分析显示赫拉特比率的显著组间差异,收缩压,舒张压,和平均动脉压(组*时间P值<0.001)。观察到的差异在注射HB-布比卡因后10-30分钟更为突出。回归模型认为性别(P值:0.002)和药物剂量(P值:0.03)显著预测不良反应的发生率。
    结论:我们的结果,提示12.5mgHB-布比卡因的给药可提供足够的麻醉,同时将下肢骨科手术持续180分钟的不良事件风险降至最低.
    背景:该研究已在临床试验注册中心(IRCT20160202026328N7)注册,于2022.01.10注册。
    BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a conventional method for proper nerve block in abdominopelvic and lower extremity surgeries. Compared to general anesthesia, SA has reduced perioperative complications significantly. The hyperbaric type of bupivacaine hydrochloride (HB) induces spinal anesthesia more efficiently with a lower incidence of life-threatening adverse reactions like Perioperative hemodynamic changes and respiratory depression. More investigations are needed to define the best dosage that provides adequate anesthesia while reducing adverse effects for each surgical procedure.
    METHODS: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial compared the consequences of the (12.5mg,15mg,20mg) dosages of HB-bupivacaine in elective lower limb orthopedic surgery. Using block randomization, we allocated 60 participants to three (n = 20) study groups. Utilizing the same protocol of anesthesia induction, outcome variables assumed and measured as the incidence of the adverse effects (Hypotension, Anxiety, Bradycardia, Nausea and Vomiting(N/V), Hypoventilation, and Decreased o2 saturation), and the requirement for intervention to control the unwanted reaction. Addressing that, outcome variables were measured 10 times perioperatively. One-way ANOVA test, the chi2 test, or repeated measures ANOVA test with the Bonferroni adjustment were utilized as appropriate.
    RESULTS: We found that the incidence of hypotension (P-value:0.02) and the N/V (P-value < 0.001) are associated with the HB-bupivacaine dosage. Contrary, our findings indicate that the incidence of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoventilation did not exhibit a significant dose-dependent pattern between the groups. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant intergroup differences for Herat rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (group*time Pvalue < 0.001). The observed differences were more prominent 10-30 min after injection of HB-bupivacaine. The regression model claimed that gender (P-value:0.002) and drug dosage (P-value:0.03) significantly predict the incidence of adverse effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results, suggest that the administration of the 12.5mg HB-bupivacaine provides adequate anesthesia while minimizing the risk of adverse events for lower limb orthopedic surgeries lasting up to 180 min.
    BACKGROUND: The study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry Center (IRCT20160202026328N7), Registered on 2022.01.10.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号