Myomectomy has evolved from open laparotomy to laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, VNOTES and robotic myomectomy. The surgical approach in doing myomectomy depends on the type and location of the myoma and the surgeon\'s expertise. Minimally invasive surgery has been the preferred approach due to the benefit of shorter hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain, earlier recovery, minimal blood loss and the cosmetic appearance of the scar. The success of this procedure depends on the incision technique, enucleation, and blood loss prevention by using hemostatic techniques and suturing techniques. Performing myomectomy for a large uterine myoma is a laparoscopic challenge; however, with the use of Lee-Huang point (midpoint between umbilicus and xiphoid) as the primary insertion and camera port, one can easily navigate thru the abdominal cavity in case the uterus is huge obscuring the umbilical port. Laparoscopic Myomectomy can be safely and efficiently performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons regardless of myoma size, number and location. Removal of large myoma specimen from the abdominal cavity through the laparoscope became a challenge after the use of power morcellator was abandoned. To overcome this problem, the large myoma is placed inside an Endo bag and its edges brought extracorporeally through the port site. The myoma is incised in a C-manner using a scalpel to reduce the size. Myoma can also be removed using in-bag power morcellation. Fertility preservation is the long-term aim of doing myomectomy instead of hysterectomy in the management of leiomyoma aside from alleviating symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, urinary frequency and abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare surgical outcomes between two new robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM)-complementary techniques: coaxial robotic single-site myomectomy (Coaxial-RSSM) and hybrid robotic single-site myomectomy (Hybrid-RSSM).
METHODS: Medical records for 132 women undergoing Coaxial-RSSM and 150 undergoing Hybrid-RSSM, consecutively, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were assessed and compared after propensity score matching (PSM).
RESULTS: In the outcomes of PSM, the Coaxial-RSSM group showed significantly reduced blood loss (79.71 vs. 163.75 mL, p < 0.001) and reduced hospital duration (4.18 ± 0.62 vs. 4.63 ± 0.90) relative to the Hybrid-RSSM group. Conversely, Hybrid-RSSM allowed for a shorter operative time compared with Coaxial-RSSM (119.19 vs. 156.01 min, p = 0.007). No conversions to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy or any need for the multi-site robotic approach occurred in either group. Postoperative complications, including ileus, fever, and wound dehiscence, showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Blood loss was lower with Coaxial-RSSM, and operative time was shorter for Hybrid-RSSM. A follow-up prospective study is warranted for more comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes between the two techniques.

Robot-assisted surgery is the next phase in the process of transhumanism. Presently, robotic surgery is used in various benign and malignant gynaecological procedures. Robot-assisted surgery is significantly superior to open surgeries in post-surgical hospital stays; however, the difference is less significant in the case of laparoscopic surgery. Estimated blood loss in robotic surgery may be less. Regarding postoperative time, the results have been inconsistent due to variations in surgeons\' experience. The primary drawbacks of robotic systems are their high installation and maintenance costs and lack of tactile feedback. Though robotic surgery allows easy dissection and fine suturing and has a faster recovery rate, to decide whether it should become the mainstream of gynaecological procedures, more randomized controlled trials are needed.

To identify factors affecting blood loss and operation time (OT) during robotic myomectomy (RM), we reviewed a total of 448 patients who underwent RM at Seoul Asan Hospital between 1 January 2019, and 28 February 2021, at Seoul Asan Hospital. To avoid variations in surgical proficiency, only 242 patients managed by two surgeons who each performed >80 RM procedures during the study period were included in this study. All cases of RM were performed with a reduced port technique. We obtained the following data from each patient\'s medical chart: age, gravidity, parity, body mass index, and history of previous abdominal surgery including cesarean section. We also collected information on the maximal diameter and type of myomas, number and weight of removed myomas, concomitant surgery, total OT from skin incision to closure, estimated blood loss (EBL), and blood transfusion. Data on preoperative use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) and perioperative use of hemostatic agents (tranexamic acid or vasopressin) were also collected. Data on the length of hospital stay, postoperative fever within 48 h, and any complications related to RM were also obtained. The primary endpoint in this study was the identification of factors affecting EBL and the secondary endpoint was the identification of factors affecting the total OT during multiport RM. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the factors affecting EBL and OT during multiport RM. The medians of the maximal diameter and weight of the removed myomas were 9.00 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.00 to 10.00) cm and 249.75 (IQR, 142.88 to 401.00) g, respectively. The median number of myomas was two (IQR, one to four), ranging from 1 to 34. Of the cases, 155 had low EBL and 87 had high EBL. Most myomas were of the intramural type (n = 179). The odds of EBL > 320 mL increased by 251% (odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-5.42) for five to nine myomas and by 647% (OR, 6.47; 95% CI, 1.87-22.33) for ≥10 myomas. The odds of subserosal-type myomas decreased by 67% compared with intramural-type myomas (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.80). History of abdominal surgery other than cesarean section was positively correlated with EBL. The weight of the removed myomas and a history of previous cesarean section were not correlated with the EBL. Conclusion: The number of myomas (5-9 and ≥10), maximal myoma diameter, and history of abdominal surgery other than cesarean section affect the EBL in RM.

The robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgical approach has improved complex gynecologic surgeries. It has the advantages of excellent visualization through the high-resolution 3-dimensional view, a wrist-like motion of the robotic arms and improved ergonomics. Similar to conventional laparoscopic surgeries, it is associated with a decrease in long-term surgical morbidity, early recovery and return to work, and improved esthetics. We discuss preoperative planning, surgical techniques, and some of the latest clinical results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes and morbidity of the vascular control technique in robotic myomectomy with the conventional technique.
METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent robotic myomectomy using laparoscopic vascular clamps in 2017 to 2019 (the practice change cohort) were retrospectively comparted with 32 case-matched consecutive patients who underwent the conventional robotic myomectomy (the historical cohort). The primary outcome was the operative blood loss and hemoglobin change.
RESULTS: The two cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. The mean operative blood loss and hemoglobin changes were lower in the practice change cohort than in the historical cohort (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). Other postoperative outcomes were similar between two cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The vascular control technique in robotic myomectomy appears to be effective and safe in the management of selective patients with symptomatic myomas.

Today, the adoption of minimal invasive gynecologic procedures is expanding their routine use in clinical practice. Until recently, a diameter of 8 cm was the recommended maximal size for laparoscopic removal of fibroids. However, robot-assisted laparoscopy improved the capacity and the feasibility of the many gynecologic procedures. Here, we report a video of robotic myomectomy of a huge myoma.

Minimizing the number of port incisions during minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved outcomes and patient satisfaction. We designed this work to study the perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) in comparison to robotic multiport myomectomy (RMM) in a certain subset of patients. The design of the study is a multicenter retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force classification III). The setting was three university hospitals. Eighty patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids undergoing robot-assisted single-site myomectomy were selected for the study. These 80 consecutive RSSM patients were matched at the uterine fibroid tumor burden level with 95 consecutive RMM patients performed at the same institutions, by the same surgeons, within a similar time frame. The main outcome measures were estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, overnight admission, and post-operative complications. Of the 175 women, 95 (54.2%) underwent RMM and 80 (45.7%) underwent RSSM. Single-site vs. multiport patient demographics differed significantly in mean age (39.1 vs. 35.6, p < 0.001), and BMI (25.3 vs. 27.5, p < 0.04). Pre-operative MRI fibroid characteristics were matched between the two cohorts. Fibroid size on imaging (5.8 cm vs. 5.9 cm, p = 0.4) and the number of fibroids removed (2.5 vs. 2.3, p = 0.08) were similar between the two groups. After adjustment for multiple covariates with regression models, single-site myomectomy and multiport myomectomy has comparable EBL (83.3 mL vs. 109.2 mL, p = 0.34), operative time (162.4 min vs. 162.4 min, p = 0.99), overnight admission (OR = 1.54, p = 0.44) and a post-operative complication (OR = 1.3, p = 0.78). In selected patients, robotic single-site myomectomy is equivalent to its multiport counterpart. Both surgical approaches are associated with low rates of intra-operative and post-operative complications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical outcomes and feasibility of robotic myomectomy in large uterine myomas.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study for robotic myomectomies performed from October 2012 to August 2017 by a single surgeon in a tertiary care referral hospital. Demographics, diagnosis, perioperative variables, operative outcomes and complications were recorded. Large uterine myoma was defined as the estimated diameter of dominant myoma equal to or larger than 10 cm by sonography.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included and 32 (43.2%) patients had large uterine myoma. Patients with myoma larger than 10 cm showed significantly heavier myoma weight (446.5 ± 206.2 mg vs. 288.1 ± 147.5, p < 0.001), similar blood loss (309.4 ± 190.3 mL vs. 200.9 ± 285.9 mL, p = 0.06), and longer operative time (263.4 ± 83.7 min vs. 219.1 ± 75.7 min, p = 0.02) compared with patients with myoma <10 cm. The largest myoma removed was 20 cm in diameter. Perioperative complications were rare.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic myomectomy is feasible for managing large uterine myomas. It is a safe procedure with acceptable longer operative time.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the symptom severity and health quality outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy.
METHODS: This was a prospective nonrandomized cohort study. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaire was administered to 33 laparoscopic myomectomy and 31 robotic myomectomy patients before and year after surgery. Symptom severity and health quality scores were compared between the preoperative and postoperative periods for laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy procedures.
RESULTS: The mean age, operation time, estimated blood loss, body mass index, largest fibroid diameter, length of hospital stay, and number of fibroids removed were comparable for both groups (P > .05). Symptom severity scores decreased significantly for both laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy patients at year after surgery (P < .05), and health-related quality of life scores increased significantly in both groups at 1 year after surgery (P < .05). Improvement in symptom severity and health quality was higher in the laparoscopy group; however, this was not statistically different from the robotic myomectomy group (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and robotic myomectomy provide significant reductions in fibroid-associated symptom severity and significant improvement in quality of life at 1 year after surgery. The rate of improvement was comparable for both procedures.