Pulmonary vein isolation

肺静脉隔离
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近建立的非热,单次脉冲场消融(PFA)是实现快速肺静脉隔离(PVI)以通过电穿孔引起细胞死亡的潜在工具,然而,关于这项最新技术的数据仍然很少。在这个荟萃分析中,我们纳入了20项研究的3,857例患者.PFA组和对照组之间的AF复发没有显着差异。亚组分析显示,除PVI外的额外消融与单纯PVI的房颤复发率相似(10%对13%,分别)。PVI耐久性达到83%(平均值),PFA组的95%CI[65-99%]和79%(平均值),对照组的95%CI[60-98%],两组的PVI耐久性差异无统计学意义。PFA组手术时间明显缩短,但不是透视时间.未观察到围手术期并发症的统计学差异。与热消融相比,PFA与更短的手术时间相关。在PFA和对照组中,心脏并发症并不常见,主要是可逆的。
    The recently established non-thermal, single-shot pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a potential tool for achieving rapid pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to cause cell death by electroporation, yet data regarding this state-of-the-art technology remain sparse. In this meta-analysis, we included 3,857 patients from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in AF recurrence between the PFA and control groups. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI has a similar rate of AF recurrence to PVI alone (10% versus 13%, respectively). PVI durability was achieved in 83% (mean), 95% CI [65-99%] of the PFA group and in 79% (mean), 95% CI [60-98%] of the control group, with no significant difference in the rate of PVI durability between the two groups. The PFA group had considerably reduced procedure duration, but not fluoroscopy time. No statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications were observed. PFA is associated with shorter procedural time than thermal ablation. Cardiac complications were uncommon and mainly reversible in both the PFA and control groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺静脉隔离(PVI)射频消融治疗心房颤动后,由于消融线不连续引起的复发是相当大的。关于非常高功率短持续时间(vHPSD,90W/4s)消融。
    方法:共纳入20例患者,在3个月时接受90WPVI和强制性重新映射程序。第一通隔离(FPI)间隙,在索引程序中确定了急性肺静脉再连接(PVR)部位;在重复程序中确定了慢性PVR部位。我们分析了消融点的参数(n=1357),并评估了它们在预测FPI差距的复合终点中的作用,急性和慢性PVR。
    结果:总计,分析了与消融线中的间隙相对应的45个初始消融点。与间隙相关的参数为病灶间距离(ILD),基线发电机阻抗,平均电流,总电荷,失去导管与组织的接触.预测间隙的最佳ILD截止值为3.5mm,和后部4毫米。
    结论:依赖于发生器阻抗的生物物理特征可能影响vHPSDPVI的疗效。与低功率消融的一致目标相比,使用较小的ILD可实现有效且持久的vHPSDPVI,与后部点相比,前部应用的ILD较低似乎是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Recurrences due to discontinuity in ablation lines are substantial after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Data are scarce regarding the durability predictors for very high-power short-duration (vHPSD, 90 W/4 s) ablation.
    METHODS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled, who underwent 90 W PVI and a mandatory remapping procedure at 3 months. First-pass isolation (FPI) gaps, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) sites were identified at the index procedure; and chronic PVR sites were identified at the repeated procedure. We analyzed parameters of ablation points (n = 1357), and evaluated their roles in predicting a composite endpoint of FPI gaps, acute and chronic PVR.
    RESULTS: In total, 45 initial ablation points corresponding to gaps in the ablation lines were analyzed. Parameters associated with gaps were interlesion distance (ILD), baseline generator impedance, mean current, total charge, and loss of catheter-tissue contact. The optimal ILD cut-off for predicting gaps was 3.5 mm anteriorly, and 4 mm posteriorly.
    CONCLUSIONS: Biophysical characteristics dependent on generator impedance could affect the efficacy of vHPSD PVI. The use of smaller ILDs is required for effective and durable PVI with vHPSD compared to the consensus targets with lower power ablation, and lower ILDs for anterior applications seem necessary compared to posterior points.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新兴的肺静脉隔离(PVI)技术。初步数据显示高安全性和有效性。与已建立的PVI能源相比,长期PVI耐久性和再传导模式的数据很少。我们将第一次脉冲场消融(PFA)后重复消融程序的结果与第一次基于冷冻球囊消融(CBA)的PVI后重复消融程序的结果进行比较。
    方法:550例连续入组患者接受PFA或CBA指数PVI。分析了有症状的房性心律失常复发患者的重复消融。
    结果:共有22/191(12%)患者在指数PFA-PVI后和44/359(12%)患者在CBA-PVI后接受了重复消融。通过多极螺旋标测导管在每个PV处检测到任何肺静脉(PV)的重建,并仔细评估PV电位,并通过3D标测在PFA-PVI后的16/22患者(73%)和CBA-PVI后的33/44(75%)(p=1.000)。在PFA-PVI后最初分离的82个PV中,31例(38%)正在重新进行;在CBA-PVI后的169个孤立的PVs中,63例(37%)正在重新进行(p=0.936)。PFA(5/22;23%)和CBA(7/44;16%;p=0.515)后患者的临床房性心动过速发生相似。与CBA-PVI(5/44;11%;p=0.023)相比,PFA-(8/22;36%)后更频繁地设置屋顶线。重复消融时,重复手术持续时间(PFA:87[76,123]min;CBA:93[75,128]min;p=0.446)相似,透视时间(PFA:11[9,14]min;CBA:11[8,14]min;p=0.739)在重复消融时组间相等。
    结论:在先前基于PFA或CBA的PVI后重复消融期间,电PV复导率和模式相似。
    OBJECTIVE: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI.
    RESULTS: A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation.
    CONCLUSIONS: During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,两种类型的冷冻球囊(CB)系统可用于心房颤动(AF)的导管消融.由于POLARx(波士顿科学公司)在冻结期间比北极前线前进Pro(AFA-Pro;Medtronic)更柔软,它倾向于更深入地进入肺静脉(PV),有肺静脉狭窄的风险。
    91名患者接受了阵发性房颤的初始CB消融术(AFA-Pro56;POLARx35)。使用倾向评分匹配从每组中提取26个。通过在PV平面内以5mm的间隔从PV口沿远侧方向追踪20mm或到每个PV中的分叉来测量PV横截面积(PVA)。对比消融前和消融后3个月的PVA。
    与AFA-Pro相比,POLARx的气球温度达到-30和-40°C的时间明显更短,最低点温度明显更低。在左下(LI)PV和右上(RS)PV中,POLARx的冷冻气球位置明显比AFA-pro深。轻度至中度狭窄的RSPV中的冻结位置比没有(10.2±3.3mmvs.8.2±1.8mm,p=.01)。在RSPV中,与AFA-Pro相比,POLARx对PVA的减少倾向于更大(26.1%±14.1%vs.19.9%±10.3%,p=.07)。
    POLARx和AFA-Pro之间的PV狭窄发生率没有显着差异。然而,如果POLARx深入PV,我们还是要小心。
    UNASSIGNED: Currently, two types of cryoballoon (CB) systems are available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the POLARx (Boston Scientific) is softer during freezing than the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA-Pro; Medtronic), it tends to go more deeply into the pulmonary vein (PV), risking PV stenosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety-one patients underwent initial CB ablation for paroxysmal AF (AFA-Pro 56; POLARx 35). Twenty-six from each group were extracted using propensity score matching. The PV cross-sectional area (PVA) was measured by tracing the area within the PV plane at 5-mm intervals from the PV ostium in a distal direction for 20 mm or to the bifurcation in each PV. The PVA was compared before and 3 months after ablation.
    UNASSIGNED: Time to balloon temperatures of -30 and - 40°C was significantly shorter and the nadir temperature was significantly lower with POLARx than with AFA-Pro. In the left inferior (LI) PV and right superior (RS) PV, the freezing balloon position was significantly deeper in POLARx than in AFA-pro. The freezing position in RSPV with mild to moderate narrowing was deeper than those without (10.2 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.2 ± 1.8 mm, p = .01). In RSPV, the reduction of PVA tended to be greater with the POLARx than with the AFA-Pro (26.1% ± 14.1% vs. 19.9% ± 10.3%, p = .07).
    UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in the incidence of PV stenosis between POLARx and AFA-Pro. However, if POLARx goes deep into the PVs, we will still have to be careful.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺静脉隔离(PVI)消融是有症状的药物难治性心房颤动(AF)患者的既定金标准疗法。射频(RF)消融的进展,导致了新型接触力传感温度控制的极高功率短时(vHPSD)射频消融的发展。此设置提供90W长达4秒的恒定冲洗流速为8mL/min。这项研究的目的是比较常规射频消融的手术结果和安全性。
    对2020年8月至2022年1月首次接受PVI消融的患者进行了一项观察性研究。队列分为:(1)vHPSD消融;(2)高功率短持续时间(HPSD)消融;(3)THERMOCOOLSMARTTOUCH™SF(STSF)。前瞻性招募vHPSD消融组,而回顾性收集HPSD和STSF组。主要结果是程序成功,PVI持续时间,消融时间和围手术期不良事件发生率。次要结果是术中吗啡和咪达唑仑的需求。
    本研究共纳入175例患者,其中vHPSD患者分别为100、30和45例,HPSD和STSF组,分别。所有vHPSD患者均成功达到PVI。与HPSD和STSF组相比,vHPSD显示出PVI和总能量应用所需的时间显着减少(67.7±29.7vs.92.9±25.7vs.93.6±29.1min,p<0.0001;9.87±4.16vs.33.9±7.49vs.36.0±10.5min,p分别<0.0001)。与HPSD和STSF组相比,vHPSD组的静脉吗啡和咪达唑仑需求较低(10.2±3.43vs.16.1±4.58vs.15.3±3.94毫克,p<0.0001;4.04±3.24vs.8.63±5.22vs.8.58±4.72毫克,p<0.0001)。在vHPSD和HPSD组均观察到一次心脏压塞,而STSF组表现出栓塞性中风和两次不需要引流的心包积液。
    在这项研究中,vHPSD表现出与其他治疗组相当的安全性。尽管存在观察性研究设计的局限性,但手术持续时间和能量应用时间均大大减少,同时需要镇静。这些初步发现在vHPSD的围手术期结局和安全性方面是有希望的,但纵向结局对于评估这项新技术的整体疗效至关重要.
    UNASSIGNED: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation is the established gold standard therapy for patients with symptomatic drug refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Advancements in radiofrequency (RF) ablation, have led to the development of the novel contact force-sensing temperature-controlled very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) RF ablation. This setting delivers 90 W for up to 4 seconds with a constant irrigation flow rate of 8 mL/min. The aim of this study was to compare procedural outcomes and safety with conventional radiofrequency ablation.
    UNASSIGNED: An observational study was conducted with patients who underwent first time PVI ablation between August 2020 and January 2022. The cohort was divided into: (1) vHPSD ablation; (2) High-power short duration (HPSD) ablation; (3) THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH™ SF (STSF). The vHPSD ablation group was prospectively recruited while the HPSD and STSF group were retrospectively collected. Primary outcomes were procedural success, PVI duration, ablation duration and incidence of perioperative adverse events. Secondary outcomes were intraprocedural morphine and midazolam requirement.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 175 patients were included in the study with 100, 30 and 45 patients in the vHPSD, HPSD and STSF group, respectively. PVI was successfully attained in all vHPSD patients. vHPSD demonstrated significantly reduced time required for PVI and total energy application in comparison to the HPSD and STSF groups (67.7 ± 29.7 vs. 92.9 ± 25.7 vs. 93.6 ± 29.1 min, p < 0.0001; 9.87 ± 4.16 vs. 33.9 ± 7.49 vs. 36.0 ± 10.5 min, p < 0.0001, respectively). Intravenous morphine and midazolam requirement was lower in the vHPSD group compared to the HPSD and STSF groups (10.2 ± 3.43 vs. 16.1 ± 4.58 vs. 15.3 ± 3.94 mg, p < 0.0001; 4.04 ± 3.24 vs. 8.63 ± 5.22 vs. 8.58 ± 4.72 mg, p < 0.0001). One cardiac tamponade was observed in both the vHPSD and HPSD groups while the STSF group exhibited an embolic stoke and two pericardial effusions that did not require drainage.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, vHPSD demonstrated a comparable safety profile to the other treatment arms. Procedural duration and energy application time was substantially reduced along with sedation requirement notwithstanding the limitations of observational study design, these preliminary findings are promising with respect to periprocedural outcomes and safety of vHPSD however longitudinal outcomes will be essential to assessing the overall efficacy of this novel technology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单发装置越来越多地用于心房颤动(AF)中的肺静脉隔离(PVI)。北极前线冷冻球囊是最常用的单发技术。最近开发的新型脉冲场消融(PFA)装置(FARAPULSE)已被引入,旨在提高手术安全性和有效性。
    这项研究将比较新型FARAPULSEPFA装置和ArcticFront冷冻球囊用于有症状的阵发性房颤患者的首次PVI。
    单发冠军是一个多中心,由独立的临床事件委员会进行盲法终点判定的随机对照试验.总的来说,210例接受PVI的阵发性房颤患者在PFA和冷冻球囊消融之间以1:1的比例随机分配。在所有患者中进行使用可植入心脏监测器的连续心律监测。
    主要终点是指在消融后91天和365天内由植入式心脏监护仪确定的任何房性快速性心律失常(房颤和/或有组织的房性快速性心律失常)首次复发时间≥120秒。复合手术安全终点包括需要引流的心脏填塞,持续性膈神经麻痹,需要干预的血管并发症,中风/短暂性脑缺血发作,心房食管瘘,以及在手术期间或手术后30天内发生的死亡。关键次要终点包括(1)消融术后第1天高敏肌钙蛋白增加,(2)消融后三维电解剖标测分析(每个研究组前25名患者),(3)AF负担,(4)生活质量的变化。
    单发CHAMPION将使用新型FRAPulsePFA评估PVI对有症状阵发性房颤患者的疗效和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Single-shot devices are increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single-shot technology. A recently developed novel pulsed field ablation (PFA) device (FARAPULSE) has been introduced with the aim to improve procedural safety and efficacy.
    UNASSIGNED: This study will compare the novel FARAPULSE PFA device and the Arctic Front cryoballoon for first PVI in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF.
    UNASSIGNED: SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication by an independent clinical events committee. Overall, 210 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing their PVI are randomized 1:1 between PFA and cryoballoon ablation. Continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable cardiac monitor is performed in all patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary endpoint is time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF and/or organized atrial tachyarrhythmia) lasting ≥120 seconds and identified by the implantable cardiac monitor within 91 and 365 days postablation. The composite procedural safety endpoint includes cardiac tamponade requiring drainage, persistent phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications requiring intervention, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula, and death occurring during or up to 30 days after the procedure. Key secondary endpoints include (1) increase in high-sensitivity troponin on day 1 postablation, (2) analysis of postablation 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (first 25 patients per study group), (3) AF burden, and (4) quality-of-life changes.
    UNASSIGNED: SINGLE SHOT CHAMPION will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PVI using the novel FARAPULSE PFA for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管房颤(AF)的治疗策略有所改善,相当比例的患者在消融术后仍有复发.本研究旨在提出一种基于Transformer的新算法,该算法利用体表心电图(ECG)信号和临床特征来预测房颤复发。
    方法:在2018年10月至2021年12月之间,纳入了在窦性心律期间接受了至少一个标准10秒表面心电图的房颤射频消融术的患者。基于Transformer和融合模块的端到端深度学习框架用于使用ECG和临床特征预测AF复发。使用接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估模型性能,灵敏度,特异性,准确性和F1分数。
    结果:总共920名患者(中位年龄61[IQR14]岁,66.3%的男性)被包括在内。经过24个月的中位随访,253例患者(27.5%)出现房颤复发。单个深度学习启用的ECG信号识别出AF复发,AUROC为0.769,灵敏度为75.5%,特异性为61.1%,F1评分为55.6%,总体准确率为65.2%。结合心电信号和临床特征,AUROC提高到0.899,灵敏度提高到81.1%,特异性为81.7%,F1得分达到71.7%,总体准确率为81.5%。
    结论:Transformer算法在预测房颤复发方面表现出优异的性能。结合心电图和临床特征可增强模型的性能,并有助于识别指征消融术后房颤复发风险较低的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Despite improvement in treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), a significant proportion of patients still experience recurrence after ablation. This study aims to propose a novel algorithm based on Transformer using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and clinical features can predict AF recurrence.
    METHODS: Between October 2018 to December 2021, patients who underwent index radiofrequency ablation for AF with at least one standard 10-second surface ECG during sinus rhythm were enrolled. An end-to-end deep learning framework based on Transformer and a fusion module was used to predict AF recurrence using ECG and clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F1-score.
    RESULTS: A total of 920 patients (median age 61 [IQR 14] years, 66.3% male) were included. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 253 patients (27.5%) experienced AF recurrence. A single deep learning enabled ECG signals identified AF recurrence with an AUROC of 0.769, sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.1%, F1 score of 55.6% and overall accuracy of 65.2%. Combining ECG signals and clinical features increased the AUROC to 0.899, sensitivity to 81.1%, specificity to 81.7%, F1 score to 71.7%, and overall accuracy to 81.5%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Transformer algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in predicting AF recurrence. Integrating ECG and clinical features enhanced the models\' performance and may help identify patients at low risk for AF recurrence after index ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    射频导管消融(RFCA)已被证明对肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者的持续性心房颤动(AF)的疗效较低。我们进行了这项研究,以评估非阻塞性HCM患者在RFCA期间对持续性AF(PsAF)的Marshall(VOM)乙醇辅助静脉输注的益处。
    这项多中心回顾性观察性研究包括102例接受RFCA加VOM乙醇输注(VOM-EI)(RFCA+VOM,n=56)或单独使用RFCA(RFCA,n=46)第一次。疗效终点为消隐期后无房颤或房性心动过速(AT)的存活。
    我们在92.9%(52/56)的患者中完成了VOM-EI。左肺静脉窦消融时间(RFCA+VOM:19.9±6.1minvs.RFCA:27.2±9.3分钟),二尖瓣峡部(MI)消融时间(RFCA+VOM:16.9±3.7minvs.RFCA:28.4±7.8分钟),冠状窦(CS)静脉消融率(RFCA+VOM:57.69%vs.RFCA:80.43%)较低,但MI阻滞的急性成功率(RFCAVOM:98.1%vs.RFCA:84.8%)高于RFCA组(均p<0.05)。经过12个月的随访,RFCA+VOM组84.6%的患者(44/52)无AF/AT存活,RFCA组中65.2%的患者(30/46)(p=0.03;比值比=2.93,95%CI:1.18-7.79).
    VOM-EI联合RFCA可降低HCM伴PsAF患者12个月时AF/AT的复发率。VOM-EI简化了左肺静脉窦和MI的消融,并增加了MI双向阻滞的成功率。
    UNASSIGNED: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been shown to have low efficacy for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We conducted this study to evaluate the benefit of adjunctive vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion during RFCA for persistent AF (PsAF) in patients with non-obstructive HCM.
    UNASSIGNED: This multicenter retrospective observational study included 102 consecutive non-obstructive HCM patients with PsAF who underwent RFCA plus VOM ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) (RFCA + VOM, n = 56) or RFCA alone (RFCA, n = 46) for the first time. The efficacy endpoint was survival without AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) after the blanking period.
    UNASSIGNED: We completed the VOM-EI in 92.9% (52/56) patients. The left pulmonary vein antrum ablation time (RFCA + VOM: 19.9 ± 6.1 min vs. RFCA: 27.2 ± 9.3 min), mitral isthmus (MI) ablation time (RFCA + VOM: 16.9 ± 3.7 min vs. RFCA: 28.4 ± 7.8 min), and rate of coronary sinus (CS) vein ablation (RFCA + VOM: 57.69% vs. RFCA: 80.43%) were lower but the acute success rate of MI block (RFCA + VOM: 98.1% vs. RFCA: 84.8%) were higher in the RFCA + VOM group than those in the RFCA group (all p < 0.05). After twelve months follow-up, 84.6% of patients (44/52) survived without AF/AT in the RFCA + VOM group, compared to 65.2% of patients (30/46) in the RFCA group (p = 0.03; odds ratio = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.18-7.79).
    UNASSIGNED: VOM-EI combined with RFCA decreased the recurrence rate of AF/AT at 12 months in HCM patients with PsAF. VOM-EI simplified the ablation of the left pulmonary vein antrum and MI and increased the success rate of MI bidirectional block.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AF)伴有不同程度的炎症和纤维化。在具有不同形式的AF和心脏状态的患者中测量纤维化的生物标志物。在这里,在心脏结构正常的患者中,我们评估了不同生物标志物的基线浓度与肺静脉隔离术(PVI)长期成功的相关性.此外,我们比较了消融前和消融后3年的生物标志物水平,以进一步了解房颤机制.
    患者,前瞻性纳入因阵发性/持续性房颤而接受PVI治疗的患者.在消融前24小时和消融后3年获得血样。血清癌症抗原125(CA-125),测定血浆胱天蛋白酶-3、半乳糖凝集素-3和组织蛋白酶L的浓度。每6个月的随访包括12导联心电图,24小时Holter,消融后的电话监测以及经胸超声心动图。生物标志物水平,在基线和3年随访时,我们比较了有和无房颤复发患者的左心室射血分数和左心房(LA)直径.
    共纳入63名患者(23名女性;年龄61.4(±8.8)岁)。所有患者均实现了所有肺静脉的急性隔离。在平均36.3±6.3个月的随访中,26例(41.3%)患者出现房颤复发。与无房颤复发患者相比,消融前后CA-125、Galectin-3、Caspase-3和组织蛋白酶L水平无显著差异。在随访期间检测到Caspase-3、Galectin-3和CathepsinL的浓度显著下降,房颤复发患者与无房颤复发患者无差异。在房颤复发组术前(r=0.477;p=0.018)和术后(r=0.533;p=0.019),Caspase-3水平与LA直径呈正相关。
    我们的结果表明CA-125、Caspase-3、CathepsinL和Galectin-3的水平与心脏结构正常且主要为阵发性房颤的患者PVI后房颤复发无关。除CA-125外,所有其他生物标志物均在消融后3年随访期间显着下降。此外,在房颤复发患者中,Caspase-3水平与LA大小呈正相关。
    UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is accompanied by inflammation and fibrosis to variable extent. The biomarkers of fibrosis were measured in patients with different forms of AF and cardiac status. Herein, we assessed the associations of the baseline concentrations of different biomarkers with the long-term success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with a structurally normal heart. Furthermore, we compared biomarker levels before and 3 years after ablation to gain further insights into the AF mechanism.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients, undergoing PVI for paroxysmal/persistent AF were enrolled prospectively. Blood samples were obtained 24 hours before and 3 years after ablation. Serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), plasma Caspase-3, Galectin-3 and Cathepsin L concentrations were measured. Follow-up visits every 6 months included 12-lead electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter, trans-telephonic monitoring as well as transthoracic echocardiography after ablation. Biomarker levels, left ventricular ejection fraction and left atrial (LA) diameters at baseline and at the 3-year follow-up were compared in patients with versus without AF recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 63 patients were enrolled (23 women; age 61.4 ( ± 8.8) years). The acute isolation of all pulmonary veins was achieved in all patients. During a mean follow-up of 36.3 ± 6.3 months, AF recurrence was demonstrated in 26 (41.3%) patients. No significant differences were demonstrated in the levels of CA-125, Galectin-3, Caspase-3 and Cathepsin L pre- and post-ablation in patients with versus without AF recurrence. A significant decrease was detected in the concentrations of Caspase-3, Galectin-3 and Cathepsin L during follow-up with no difference in patients with versus without AF recurrence. A positive correlation was found between Caspase-3 levels and LA diameters in the AF recurrence group both before (r = 0.477; p = 0.018) and after the procedure (r = 0.533; p = 0.019).
    UNASSIGNED: Our results demonstrated that the levels of CA-125, Caspase-3, Cathepsin L and Galectin-3 are not associated with AF recurrence after PVI in patients with a structurally normal heart and mainly paroxysmal AF. Except for CA-125, all the other biomarkers demonstrated a significant decrease during a 3-year follow-up post-ablation. Furthermore, Caspase-3 levels demonstrated a positive correlation with LA dimensions in patients with AF recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号