Pulmonary vein isolation

肺静脉隔离
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前关于使用射频球囊(RFB)进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的临床研究报告了使用常规消融设置并通过后/前(PST/ANT)电极进行20/60秒射频输送的安全有效的手术。最新证据表明,当面对食道区域时,将后壁的应用时间减少到15秒(s)与应用20s一样有效。
    目的:前瞻性评估将PST/ANT节段的RF时间减少到15/45s是否可以确保足够的病变指标质量,并将新的缩短消融设置与常规消融设置在安全性方面进行比较,1年的有效性。
    方法:共有来自7个欧洲中心的641名患者参加了一项合作登记,在常规射频输送组中有374个,在缩短的射频输送组中有267个。程序性结果,病变指标,评估和比较各组间的安全性.
    结果:在SHRT和CONV组中,在一年时无任何心房速转携带率分别为85.4%和88.2%,分别。缩短的射频输送策略与显著缩短的手术时间相关(中位数63.5vs.96.5分钟,P<0.001)和缩短透视暴露(中位数10.0vs.14.0分钟,P<0.001)与常规递送相比。疗效指标,包括首次隔离率和隔离时间,组间具有可比性。缩短射频输送与手术并发症发生率较低相关(1.4%vs.5.3%,P=0.04)和优化的热特性。
    结论:来自COLLABORATE登记处的分析表明,与常规递送时间相比,在使用RFB的PVI期间将RF能量递送时间缩短至15/45s(PST/ANT)可避免复发性房性心律失常,效率和安全性相当。
    BACKGROUND: Previous clinical studies on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a radiofrequency balloon (RFB) reported safe and effective procedures using Conventional ablation settings with 20/60-second RF delivery via posterior/anterior (PST/ANT) electrodes. The latest evidence suggests that reducing the application time to 15 seconds (s) on the posterior wall when facing the esophageal region is as effective as applying 20 s.
    OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess whether reducing RF time on PST/ANT segments to 15/45 s can ensure sufficient quality of lesion metrics and compare the new Shortened ablation settings with the Conventional one in terms of safety, and effectiveness at 1-year.
    METHODS: A total of 641 patients from 7 European centers were enrolled in a collaborative registry, with 374 in the conventional RF delivery group and 267 in the shortened RF delivery group. Procedural outcomes, lesion metrics, and safety profiles were assessed and compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: Freedom of any atrial tachycarrythmias at one year were 85.4% and 88.2% in the SHRT and CONV groups, respectively. The shortened RF delivery strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedure times (median 63.5 vs. 96.5 minutes, P < 0.001) and shortened fluoroscopy exposure (median 10.0 vs. 14.0 minutes, P < 0.001) compared to conventional delivery. Efficacy metrics, including first-pass isolation rates and time to isolation, were comparable between groups. Shortened RF delivery was associated with a lower incidence of procedural complications (1.4% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.04) and optimized thermal characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS: Analyses from the COLLABORATE Registry demonstrate that shortening RF energy delivery times to 15/45s (PST/ANT) during PVI with the RFB resulted in comparable freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional delivery times with comparable efficiency and safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a nonthermal energy source used for cardiac ablation procedures. Cell death during PFA occurs via electroporation: ultrarapid (micro- to nanosecond) electrical pulses are applied to destabilize cell membranes causing irreversible pores. PFA leads to preferential ablation of myocardiocytes, sparing adjacent tissue like the esophagus or phrenic nerve. Preliminary clinical studies show high efficacy and a good safety profile in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. The question remains, however, whether this new technology will replace well-known and established thermal energy sources like radiofrequency current or cryoablation within the next 5 years.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Pulsed-Field-Ablation (PFA) ist eine nichtthermische Energieform, bei deren Anwendung durch kurze Pulse hoher Spannung mittels des Prinzips der Elektroporation Gewebe abladiert wird. Es besteht eine gewisse Selektivität der PFA für Kardiomyozyten, so dass das umgebende Gewebe wie der N. phrenicus oder auch der Ösophagus geschont wird. In ersten klinischen Untersuchungen zeigt sich eine hohe Effektivität und Sicherheit bei der Pulmonalvenenisolation (PVI) zur Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern. Die Frage ist, ob diese neue Energieform der Ablation die thermischen Verfahren wie Hochfrequenzstrom und Kryoablation in 5 Jahren ersetzten wird.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation is a time-efficient procedure that can alleviate stress on electrophysiology lab resources. This analysis modeled the impact of cryoballoon ablation on electrophysiology lab operation using data from Latin America.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from centers in Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, and Chile of the were used as inputs for an electrophysiology lab efficiency simulation model. The model used the assumption that either two (today\'s electrophysiology lab operations) or three (including electrophysiology lab operational changes) cryoballoon ablation procedures could be performed per day. The endpoints were the percentage of days that resulted in 1) overtime and 2) time left for an extra non-ablation electrophysiology procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from a total of 232 procedures from six Latin American centers were included in the analysis. The average electrophysiology lab occupancy time for all procedures in Latin America was 132 ± 62 minutes. In the Current Scenario (two procedures per day), 7.4% of simulated days resulted in overtime, and 81.4% had enough time for an extra electrophysiology procedure. In the Enhanced Productivity Scenario (three procedures per day), 16.4% of days used overtime, while 67.4% allowed time for an extra non-ablation electrophysiology procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: Using real-world, Latin American-specific data, we found that with operational changes, three ablation procedures could feasibly be performed daily, leaving time for an extra electrophysiology procedure on more than half of days. Thus, use of cryoballoon ablation is an effective tool to enhance electrophysiology lab efficiency in resource-constrained regions such as Latin America.
    UNASSIGNED: La ablación con criobalón para el aislamiento de venas pulmonares es un procedimiento que ahorra tiempo y puede ahorrar recursos del laboratorio de electrofisiología. Este análisis modeló el impacto de la ablación con criobalón en el funcionamiento del laboratorio de electrofisiología utilizando datos de América Latina.
    UNASSIGNED: Los datos de los centros de Argentina, México, Colombia y Chile del se utilizaron como datos de entrada para un modelo de simulación de la eficiencia del laboratorio de electrofisiología. El modelo partió del supuesto de que se podían realizar dos (operaciones actuales del laboratorio de electrofisiología) o tres (incluidos los cambios operativos del laboratorio de electrofisiología) procedimientos de ablación con criobalón por día. Los criterios de valoración eran el porcentaje de días en los que se producían 1) horas extraordinarias y 2) tiempo restante para un procedimiento electrofisiológico adicional no relacionado con la ablación.
    UNASSIGNED: Se incluyeron en el análisis los datos un total de 232 procedimientos de seis centros latinoamericanos. El tiempo medio de ocupación del laboratorio de electrofisiología para todos los procedimientos en Latinoamérica fue de 132 ± 62 minutos. En el escenario actual (dos procedimientos por día), el 7,4% de los días simulados resultaron en horas extras, y el 81,4% tuvo tiempo suficiente para un procedimiento de electrofisiología adicional. En el escenario de productividad mejorada (tres procedimientos por día), el 16,4% de los días utilizó horas extraordinarias, mientras que el 67,4% dispuso de tiempo suficiente para un procedimiento electrofisiológico extra sin ablación.
    UNASSIGNED: Utilizando datos del mundo real específicos de América Latina, descubrimos que, aplicando cambios operativos, es factible realizar tres procedimientos de ablación al día, lo que deja tiempo para un procedimiento de electrofisiología adicional en más de la mitad de los días. Por lo tanto, el uso de la ablación con criobalón es una herramienta eficaz para mejorar la eficiencia de los laboratorios de electrofisiología en regiones con recursos limitados como América Latina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近建立的非热,单次脉冲场消融(PFA)是实现快速肺静脉隔离(PVI)以通过电穿孔引起细胞死亡的潜在工具,然而,关于这项最新技术的数据仍然很少。在这个荟萃分析中,我们纳入了20项研究的3,857例患者.PFA组和对照组之间的AF复发没有显着差异。亚组分析显示,除PVI外的额外消融与单纯PVI的房颤复发率相似(10%对13%,分别)。PVI耐久性达到83%(平均值),PFA组的95%CI[65-99%]和79%(平均值),对照组的95%CI[60-98%],两组的PVI耐久性差异无统计学意义。PFA组手术时间明显缩短,但不是透视时间.未观察到围手术期并发症的统计学差异。与热消融相比,PFA与更短的手术时间相关。在PFA和对照组中,心脏并发症并不常见,主要是可逆的。
    The recently established non-thermal, single-shot pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a potential tool for achieving rapid pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to cause cell death by electroporation, yet data regarding this state-of-the-art technology remain sparse. In this meta-analysis, we included 3,857 patients from 20 studies. There was no significant difference in AF recurrence between the PFA and control groups. Subgroup analysis showed that additional ablation beyond PVI has a similar rate of AF recurrence to PVI alone (10% versus 13%, respectively). PVI durability was achieved in 83% (mean), 95% CI [65-99%] of the PFA group and in 79% (mean), 95% CI [60-98%] of the control group, with no significant difference in the rate of PVI durability between the two groups. The PFA group had considerably reduced procedure duration, but not fluoroscopy time. No statistically significant differences in periprocedural complications were observed. PFA is associated with shorter procedural time than thermal ablation. Cardiac complications were uncommon and mainly reversible in both the PFA and control groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定完整环或柔性带瓣膜成形术对房颤引起的心房功能性二尖瓣反流患者二尖瓣修复的耐久性,并确定与术后二尖瓣反流复发相关的危险因素。
    方法:从1/1/2000-1/1/2023年,194名有房颤史的成年人接受了二尖瓣修复术,单用瓣膜成形术治疗中度/重度心房功能性二尖瓣反流。排除标准是以前的心脏手术,额外的修复技术,射血分数<45%,缺血性心脏病,主动脉瓣疾病,二尖瓣环钙化,以及手术消融或三尖瓣修复/置换以外的伴随程序。使用术后回声数据的纵向分析评估了瓣环成形术的耐久性。
    结果:在126/194(65%)患者中进行了完整的环瓣环成形术;在68/194(35%)中选择了部分环(后带)。同时,64%(124/194)的患者接受了三尖瓣手术,89%(173/194)的患者接受了心房颤动手术,包括88%(152/173)的双心房Cox-MazeIII/IV病变和12%的肺静脉隔离(21/173)。所有患者均无/微量二尖瓣反流出院。10年时,单用瓣环成形术修复后,中度/重度二尖瓣反流的发生率为89%,并且在完整与完整之间没有发现显着差异部分环成形术(早期P=0.41,晚期P=0.92)。48%的患者在手术后3个月或更长时间出现房颤,术后房颤的存在与二尖瓣反流复发的可能性无关(P=0.15).10年时,二尖瓣再干预的自由度为96%(图形摘要)。
    结论:在适当的心房功能性二尖瓣反流患者中,完整的环和后带瓣环成形术技术具有出色的长期耐久性。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the durability of mitral valve repair with complete ring or flexible band annuloplasty in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation due to atrial fibrillation and identify risk factors associated with postoperative mitral regurgitation recurrence.
    METHODS: From 1/1/2000-1/1/2023, 194 adults with history of atrial fibrillation underwent mitral valve repair with annuloplasty alone for moderate/severe atrial functional mitral regurgitation. Exclusion criteria were prior cardiac surgery, additional repair techniques, ejection fraction<45%, ischemic heart disease, aortic valve disease, mitral annular calcification, and concomitant procedures other than surgical ablation or tricuspid repair/replacement. Durability of annuloplasty was assessed using longitudinal analysis of postoperative echo data.
    RESULTS: Complete ring annuloplasty was performed in 126/194(65%) patients; partial ring(posterior band) was chosen in 68/194(35%). Concomitantly, 64%(124/194) of patients underwent tricuspid valve surgery and 89%(173/194) an atrial fibrillation procedure, including biatrial Cox-Maze III/IV lesion set in 88%(152/173) and pulmonary vein isolation in 12%(21/173). All patients were discharged with no/trace mitral regurgitation. Freedom from moderate/severe mitral regurgitation after repair with annuloplasty alone was 89% at 10 years, and no significant differences were noted between complete vs. partial ring annuloplasty(early P=0.41, late P=0.92). Forty-eight percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation 3 or more months after surgery, and presence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was not associated with higher likelihood of recurrence of mitral regurgitation(P=0.15). Freedom from mitral reintervention was 96% at 10 years(Graphical Abstract).
    CONCLUSIONS: In appropriate patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation, long-term durability of annuloplasty is excellent with complete ring and posterior band annuloplasty techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺静脉隔离(PVI)射频消融治疗心房颤动后,由于消融线不连续引起的复发是相当大的。关于非常高功率短持续时间(vHPSD,90W/4s)消融。
    方法:共纳入20例患者,在3个月时接受90WPVI和强制性重新映射程序。第一通隔离(FPI)间隙,在索引程序中确定了急性肺静脉再连接(PVR)部位;在重复程序中确定了慢性PVR部位。我们分析了消融点的参数(n=1357),并评估了它们在预测FPI差距的复合终点中的作用,急性和慢性PVR。
    结果:总计,分析了与消融线中的间隙相对应的45个初始消融点。与间隙相关的参数为病灶间距离(ILD),基线发电机阻抗,平均电流,总电荷,失去导管与组织的接触.预测间隙的最佳ILD截止值为3.5mm,和后部4毫米。
    结论:依赖于发生器阻抗的生物物理特征可能影响vHPSDPVI的疗效。与低功率消融的一致目标相比,使用较小的ILD可实现有效且持久的vHPSDPVI,与后部点相比,前部应用的ILD较低似乎是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Recurrences due to discontinuity in ablation lines are substantial after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. Data are scarce regarding the durability predictors for very high-power short-duration (vHPSD, 90 W/4 s) ablation.
    METHODS: A total of 20 patients were enrolled, who underwent 90 W PVI and a mandatory remapping procedure at 3 months. First-pass isolation (FPI) gaps, and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) sites were identified at the index procedure; and chronic PVR sites were identified at the repeated procedure. We analyzed parameters of ablation points (n = 1357), and evaluated their roles in predicting a composite endpoint of FPI gaps, acute and chronic PVR.
    RESULTS: In total, 45 initial ablation points corresponding to gaps in the ablation lines were analyzed. Parameters associated with gaps were interlesion distance (ILD), baseline generator impedance, mean current, total charge, and loss of catheter-tissue contact. The optimal ILD cut-off for predicting gaps was 3.5 mm anteriorly, and 4 mm posteriorly.
    CONCLUSIONS: Biophysical characteristics dependent on generator impedance could affect the efficacy of vHPSD PVI. The use of smaller ILDs is required for effective and durable PVI with vHPSD compared to the consensus targets with lower power ablation, and lower ILDs for anterior applications seem necessary compared to posterior points.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:双极电压振幅能够帮助确定心房颤动(AF)射频(RF)消融期间的理想病变大小指数(LSI)设置。
    目的:确定非瓣膜性房颤患者的电压引导肺静脉隔离(PVI)是否不劣于常规LSI引导的PVI。
    方法:这是一项为期12个月的多中心随机试验。本研究的主要疗效终点为房颤复发,房扑,和/或房性心动过速,非劣效性的危险比设定为1.4.主要安全终点是手术相关并发症的复合。
    结果:共有370名患者接受了随机分组;189名和181名患者被分配到电压组(接受电压引导的PVI)和对照组(接受常规LSI引导的PVI)。分别。主要疗效终点发生在电压组22例(12.0%)和对照组23例(12.9%)(1年Kaplan-Meier无事件发生率估计,88.0%和87.1%,分别;危险比,1.00;95%置信区间[CI],0.801.25)。电压组的主要安全性终点为4.8%,对照组为6.6%(p=0.2791)。电压组PVI时间明显缩短(35.7±14.5minvs.39.7±14.7min,p<0.001)。
    结论:在治疗房颤患者的疗效方面,电压引导的PVI不劣于常规LSI引导的PVI,其使用显着缩短了手术时间。
    BACKGROUND: Bipolar voltage amplitude is capable of helping determine the ideal lesion size index (LSI) setting during radiofrequency (RF) ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether voltage-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is noninferior to conventional LSI-guided PVI in patients with nonvalvular AF.
    METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized trial conducted over a period of 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoints of the study were AF recurrence, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the noninferiority margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.4. The primary safety end point was a composite of procedure-related complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 370 patients underwent randomization; 189 and 181 were assigned to the voltage (underwent voltage-guided PVI) and control (underwent conventional LSI-guided PVI) groups, respectively. The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 22 patients (12.0%) in the voltage group and 23 (12.9%) in the control group (1-year Kaplan-Meier event-free rate estimates, 88.0% and 87.1%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 1.25). The primary safety endpoints were 4.8% in the voltage group and 6.6% in the control group (p = 0.2791). PVI time was significantly shorter in the voltage group (35.7 ± 14.5 min vs. 39.7 ± 14.7 min, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Voltage-guided PVI was noninferior to conventional LSI-guided PVI with respect to efficacy in the treatment of patients with AF and its use significantly reduced procedure time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脉冲场消融(PFA)和无氟消融(FA)是电生理学中当代新兴的技术。随着3D电解剖标测系统和先进的心内回波(ICE)成像的广泛使用,无氟消融已被广泛采用。然而,由于组织接触对损伤耐久性的重要性,初始PFA已与透视引导一起使用,但是ICE和电解剖标测都使无氟PFA可行。这项研究的目的是证明PFA可以安全有效地完成而无需透视。
    方法:在单个中心,描述了使用无氟途径的PentasplinePFA导管进行消融的连续患者。根据内部和外部投影的变化调整标准3D解剖图设置,呼吸补偿,和插值。此外,病灶投影图用于确认充分的圆周消融病灶.ICE广泛用于导线引导和评估与组织的接触。
    结果:从2024年3月15日开始,50名68.0(±13.7)岁的连续受试者(19名女性/31名男性)接受了PFA消融。CHA2DS2-VA2Sc平均得分为3.0(±1.9)。平均LVEF为57.3%(±10.0),平均LA大小为3.9cm(±1.2)。每次应用PFA时都放置投射性病变。平均施用41.7(±8.5)个PFA。在100%(50/50)的受试者中,实现了肺静脉的急性隔离。18名受试者同时进行了后壁隔离,其中100%的受试者,实现了后隔离。该队列中没有并发症。在50/50受试者(100%)中,未使用透视检查.与对照组相比,消融导管的LA停留时间相似(p=0.34).
    结论:与传统的PFA透视法相比,这项概念验证研究表明,无氟消融PFA可以安全地进行,其急性成功率与透视检查相似.
    BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and fluoroless ablation (FA) are emerging techniques in contemporary in electrophysiology. With widespread use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and advanced intracardiac echo (ICE) imaging, fluoroless ablation has become more widely adopted. However, with the importance of tissue contact for lesion durability, initial PFA has been used with fluoroscopic guidance, but both ICE and electroanatomic mapping make fluoroless PFA feasible. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that PFA can be done safely and effectively without fluoroscopy.
    METHODS: At a single center, consecutive patients undergoing ablation with a pentaspline PFA catheter using a fluoroless approach are described. The standard 3D anatomic map settings were adjusted with changes in interior and exterior projection, respiratory compensation, and interpolation. In addition, projection map lesions were used to confirm adequate circumferential ablation lesions. ICE was used extensively for wire guidance and evaluation of contact with tissue.
    RESULTS: Beginning on March 15, 2024, 50 consecutive subjects (19 female/31 male) aged 68.0 (± 13.7) underwent PFA ablation. The average CHA2DS2-VA2Sc score was 3.0 (± 1.9). The average LVEF was 57.3% (± 10.0) and the average LA size was 3.9 cm (± 1.2). Projection lesions were placed with every application of PFA. An average of 41.7 (± 8.5) PFA applications were placed. In 100% (50/50) of subjects, acute isolation of the pulmonary veins was achieved. Eighteen subjects also underwent concomitant posterior wall isolation and in 100% of these subjects, posterior isolation was achieved. There were zero complications in this cohort. In 50/50 subjects (100%), fluoroscopy was not used. In comparison to the control cohort, the LA dwell time of the ablation catheter was similar (p = 0.34).
    CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to the traditional PFA with fluoroscopy, this proof-of-concept study shows fluoroless PFA ablation can be performed safely and with similar acute success rates as with use of fluoroscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新兴的肺静脉隔离(PVI)技术。初步数据显示高安全性和有效性。与已建立的PVI能源相比,长期PVI耐久性和再传导模式的数据很少。我们将第一次脉冲场消融(PFA)后重复消融程序的结果与第一次基于冷冻球囊消融(CBA)的PVI后重复消融程序的结果进行比较。
    方法:550例连续入组患者接受PFA或CBA指数PVI。分析了有症状的房性心律失常复发患者的重复消融。
    结果:共有22/191(12%)患者在指数PFA-PVI后和44/359(12%)患者在CBA-PVI后接受了重复消融。通过多极螺旋标测导管在每个PV处检测到任何肺静脉(PV)的重建,并仔细评估PV电位,并通过3D标测在PFA-PVI后的16/22患者(73%)和CBA-PVI后的33/44(75%)(p=1.000)。在PFA-PVI后最初分离的82个PV中,31例(38%)正在重新进行;在CBA-PVI后的169个孤立的PVs中,63例(37%)正在重新进行(p=0.936)。PFA(5/22;23%)和CBA(7/44;16%;p=0.515)后患者的临床房性心动过速发生相似。与CBA-PVI(5/44;11%;p=0.023)相比,PFA-(8/22;36%)后更频繁地设置屋顶线。重复消融时,重复手术持续时间(PFA:87[76,123]min;CBA:93[75,128]min;p=0.446)相似,透视时间(PFA:11[9,14]min;CBA:11[8,14]min;p=0.739)在重复消融时组间相等。
    结论:在先前基于PFA或CBA的PVI后重复消融期间,电PV复导率和模式相似。
    OBJECTIVE: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI.
    RESULTS: A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation.
    CONCLUSIONS: During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:长期持续性心房颤动(LSPAF)患者的治疗是一项临床挑战。与仅心内膜消融相比,混合收敛消融已被证明具有更好的疗效。然而,关于伴随的左心耳(LAA)管理以及混合消融的数据很少.
    方法:我们的目的是评估LSPAF患者同时行混合会聚消融和左心耳夹闭的有效性。我们对在我们机构接受LAA夹闭混合手术消融术的所有LSPAF患者进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是12个月时房性心律失常的复发。Further,在心内膜导管消融术期间,采用常规电生理标准检查手术左心房后壁消融术的耐久性.
    结果:共纳入79例患者。平均年龄为63.5±9.6岁,71%是男性。99%的患者进行了左心耳夹闭。手术和心内膜阶段之间的平均时间为2.6±1.7个月。在手术的心内膜阶段,在34.2%(n=27/79)的患者中观察到持续的后壁活动。74%的患者使用心脏植入式电子设备监测房颤(AF)的复发。12个月时房颤自由度的主要有效率为73.8%(45/61)。经过12个月的随访,11.4%(9/79)的患者需要重复导管消融,其中88.9%(8/9)有持续后壁活动的证据。
    结论:在LSPAF患者中,采用心房夹进行混合聚合消融和LAA排除可提供合理的长期无AF生存。在混合收敛式房颤消融术后出现复发性房颤的患者中常见持续的后壁活动。
    BACKGROUND: Management of patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) presents a clinical challenge. Hybrid convergent ablation has been shown to have superior efficacy compared to endocardial-only ablation. However, data on concomitant left atrial appendage (LAA) management along with hybrid ablation is sparse.
    METHODS: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA clipping in patients with LSPAF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with LSPAF who underwent hybrid surgical ablation with LAA clipping at our institution. The primary endpoint was a recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Further, the durability of surgical left atrial posterior wall ablation was examined during the endocardial catheter ablation using standing electrophysiological criteria.
    RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were included. Mean age was 63.5 ± 9.6 years, and 71% were males. LAA clipping was performed in 99% of patients. The mean time between the surgical and endocardial stages of the procedure was 2.6 ± 1.7 months. Persistent posterior wall activity was observed in 34.2% (n = 27/79) patients during the endocardial phase of the procedure. Cardiac implantable electronic device was used in 74% of patients for monitoring of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary effectiveness of AF freedom at 12 months was 73.8% (45/61). Over a 12-month follow-up period, 11.4% (9/79) of patients required repeat catheter ablation, of which 88.9% (8/9) had evidence of persistent posterior wall activity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA exclusion with an atrial clip provides reasonable long-term AF-free survival in patients with LSPAF. Persistent posterior wall activity is seen commonly in patients presenting with recurrent AF following hybrid convergent AF ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号