UNASSIGNED: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use.
UNASSIGNED: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m2 and 19% reported a history of nicotine use. Postoperative follow-up visits were available with a median of 68 days (interquartile range = 41-209 days) from revision PCF. There were 91 1-level, 49 2-level, 8 3-level, and 2 4±-level PCF revision cases. The mean operative duration was 52 ± 3 min with an estimated blood loss of 14 ± 1.5cc. Participants were discharged an average of 1 ± 0.05 days following surgery. Multilevel treatment resulted in longer procedure times (single = 45 min, multi = 59 min, P = 0.01) but did not impact estimated blood loss (P = 0.94). Total nights in the hospital increased by 0.2 nights with multilevel treatment (P = 0.01). Sex, age, nicotine history, and BMI had no effect on recorded perioperative outcomes. There was one instance of rehospitalization due to deep-vein thrombosis, one instance of persistent pseudarthrosis at the revised level treated with ACDF, and four instances of adjacent segment disease. In patients initially treated with multilevel ACDF, revisions occurred most commonly on the caudal level (48% of revised levels), followed by the cranial (43%), and least often in the middle level (9%).
UNASSIGNED: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery.

Wrist and hand arthroscopy, despite being an old tool, has gained popularity and advanced in assisting in the treatment of various injuries and conditions in the region in recent years. Dorsal, volar, ulnar, and radial accessory portals are used to reach all points of the carpal and hand joints. The minimal tissue damage, lesser injury to the capsule and its mechanoreceptors, the assessment of injuries associated with the reason for surgery, and aesthetically more favorable scars have attracted many doctors and their patients. As a result, there has been an increase in publications and diversifications of arthroscopic techniques. The aim of this update article is to present the advances and the evidence available in the literature to assist readers in their decision on which technique to use in the treatment of wrist and hand conditions.

Spondylolysis with pseudarthrosis may be treated surgically by repairing the spondylolysis using the smiley face rod (SFR) technique. The SFR technique can avoid adjacent segmental disease caused by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), which is one of the main surgical techniques to treat isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis. A 59-year-old woman had been playing softball since she was 12 years old and was a member of a prefectural representative team. She sought treatment because of numbness in her left lower limb and difficulty playing softball. Despite conservative treatment for a year, her symptoms did not improve. Physical examination revealed decreased patellar tendon reflexes and numbness and pain from the front of the thigh to the lower leg without muscle weakness. Imaging showed L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis with Meyerding classification grade 2 anterior slip and L5 spondylolysis with pseudarthrosis. We diagnosed L4 radiculopathy caused by L4/5 foraminal stenosis and L4 isthmic spondylolisthesis with L5 spondylolysis. She underwent surgery combining the TLIF of L4/5 and the SFR technique of L5 using dual-headed pedicle screws that can fix two types of rods with L5 pedicle screws. Three months after surgery, fusion between L4/5 and fusion of the L5 pars cleft were confirmed. She resumed sports, and one year postoperatively, she was able to participate in softball games. Two years postoperatively, she could bat, run, and play defense without adjacent segmental disease. Two-segment TLIF increases adjacent segmental disease more than single-segment TLIF. Because the L5 spondylolysis had not slipped, we chose the SFR technique to preserve mobility at L5/S1. The dual-headed pedicle screw fastens two-type rods at the head of the pedicle screw, making it a suitable design for this procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To establish an analysis pipeline for the volumetric evaluation of the osteotomy site after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO).
METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before, directly after BSSO, and 6-12 months after surgery. Image segmentations of each osteotomy gap data set were performed manually by four physicians and were compared to a semi-automatic segmentation approach.
RESULTS: Five patients with a total of ten osteotomy gaps were included. The mean interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of individual patients was 0.782 and the standard deviation 0.080 when using the manual segmentation approach. However, the mean ICC of the evaluation of anatomical sites and time points separately was 0.214, suggesting a large range of deviation within the manual segmentation of each rater. The standard deviation was 0.355, further highlighting the extent of the variation. In contrast, the semi-automatic approach had a mean ICC of 0.491 and a standard deviation of 0.365, which suggests a relatively higher agreement among the operators compared to the manual segmentation approach. Furthermore, the volume of the osteotomy gap in the semi-automatic approach showed the same tendency in every site as the manual segmentation approach, but with less deviation.
CONCLUSIONS: The semi-automatic approach developed in the present study proved to be valid as a standardised method with high repeatability. Such image analysis methods could help to quantify the progression of bone healing after BSSO and beyond, eventually facilitating the earlier identification of patients with retarded healing.

This study presents a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of pseudarthrosis risk factors following lumbar fusion procedures. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for outcome measurements. The objective of this study was to identify the independent risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar spinal fusion, which is crucial for mitigating morbidity and reoperation. Systematic searches in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (1990-July 2021) were conducted using specific terms. The inclusion criteria included prospective and retrospective cohorts and case‒control series reporting ORs with 95% CIs from multivariate analysis. The quality assessment utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analysis, employing OR and 95% CI, assessed pseudarthrosis risk factors in lumbar fusion surgery, depicted in a forest plot. Of the 568 abstracts identified, 12 met the inclusion criteria (9 retrospective, 2006-2021). The 17 risk factors were categorized into clinical, radiographic, surgical, and bone turnover marker factors. The meta-analysis highlighted two significant clinical risk factors: age (95% CI 1.02-1.11; p = 0.005) and smoking (95% CI 1.68-5.44; p = 0.0002). The sole significant surgical risk factor was the number of fused levels (pooled OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.17-1.55; p < 0.0001). This study identified 17 risk factors for pseudarthrosis after lumbar fusion surgery, emphasizing age, smoking status, and the number of fusion levels. Prospective studies are warranted to explore additional risk factors and assess the impact of surgery and graft type.

BACKGROUND: When using traditional extensible intramedullary rods to treat congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT), there were cases of re-fracture and internal fixation fracture. Therefore, the authors propose a research hypothesis that a thicker distal extensible intramedullary rod can better protect the tibia and reduce the incidence of refracture PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of new and traditional extensible intramedullary rods in the treatment of CPT in children METHODS: From January 2017 to December 2021, the clinical data of 49 children with CPT who were treated with traditional extensible intramedullary rod combined surgery (group A) and new extensible intramedullary rod combined surgery (group B) in our hospital were collected. Inclusive criteria: ① Crawford type IV CPT children; ② The operation was performed by the same team.
METHODS: patients with multiple tibial angulation. During follow-up, the initial healing, proximal tibial valgus, tibial length, ankle valgus, refracture and intramedullary rod displacement of CPT children in the two groups were evaluated RESULTS: It was a retrospective investigation. In group A, 26 cases met the inclusion criteria, 24 cases achieved primary healing, with an primary healing rate of 92%, including 1 case of nonunion due to osteomyelitis complications after surgery, and 1 case of delayed healing, with an average healing time of 4.7 ± 0.8 months. 17 cases (68%) had unequal tibia length, with an average difference of 1.6 ± 0.8 cm. Ankle valgus occurred in 10 cases (40%) with an average of 14.4°±4.8°; Proximal tibial valgus occurred in 6 cases (24%) with an average of 7 °± 1.8 °. 20 cases (80%) had tip of the rod migration.10 cases (40%) had re-fracture; The average follow-up time was 2.4 ± 0.4 years. In group B, 22 patients achieved primary healing, and the primary healing rate was 95%, including 1 case with delayed healing. The average healing time was 4.7 ± 1.7months. 14 cases (61%) had unequal tibia length, with an average difference of 1 ± 0.5 cm. Ankle valgus occurred in 4 cases (17%) with an average of 12.3 °±4.9°; The proximal tibia valgus occurred in 9 cases (39%), with an average of 7.7 °±2.5 °. 14 cases (61%) had new type of intramedullary rod displacement. 3 cases (13%) had re-fracture; The average follow-up time was 2.3 ± 0.6years CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional extended intramedullary rod combined operation, the new type of extended intramedullary rod combined operation has a lower incidence of re-fracture after CPT, but it still needs to be verified by large sample and multi-center research.

Addressing non-unions involves stabilizing the affected area through osteosynthesis and improving bone biology using bone grafts. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment method. This study aims to compare outcomes of non-union surgery using conventional treatment methods (metal hardware ± graft) versus osteosynthesis with the human allogeneic cortical bone screw (Shark Screw®) alone or in combination with a metallic plate. Thirty-four patients underwent conventional treatment, while twenty-eight cases received one or more Shark Screws®. Patient demographics, bone healing, time to bone healing, and complications were assessed. Results revealed a healing rate of 96.4% for the Shark Screw® group, compared to 82.3% for the conventionally treated group. The Shark Screw® group exhibited a tendency for faster bone healing (9.4 ± 3.2 vs. 12.9 ± 8.5 weeks, p = 0.05061). Hardware irritations led to six metal removals in the conventional group versus two in the Shark Screw® group. The Shark Screw® emerges as a promising option for personalized non-union treatment in the foot, ankle, and select lower leg cases, facilitating effective osteosynthesis and grafting within a single construct and promoting high union rates, low complications, and a rapid healing process.

METHODS: A prospective multicenter clinical trial (NCT03177473) was conducted with a retrospective cohort used as a control arm.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate cervical spine fusion rates in subjects with risk factors for pseudarthrosis who received pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) treatment.
BACKGROUND: Certain risk factors predispose patients to pseudarthrosis, which is associated with prolonged pain, reduced function, and decreased quality of life.
METHODS: Subjects in the PEMF group were treated with PEMF for 6 months postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was fusion status at the 12-month follow-up period. Fusion status was determined using anterior/posterior, lateral, and flexion/extension radiographs and computed tomography (without contrast).
RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were evaluated (PEMF, n=160; Control, n=53). At baseline, the PEMF group had a higher percentage of subjects who used nicotine ( P =0.01), had osteoporosis ( P <0.05), multi-level disease ( P <0.0001), and were >65 years of age ( P =0.01). The PEMF group showed over two-fold higher percentage of subjects that had ≥3 risk factors (n=92/160, 57.5%) compared with the control group (n=14/53, 26.4%). At the 12-month follow-up, the PEMF group demonstrated significantly higher fusion rates compared with the control (90.0% vs. 60.4%, P <0.05). A statistically significant improvement in fusion rate was observed in PEMF subjects with multi-level surgery ( P <0.0001) and high BMI (>30 kg/m 2 ; P =0.0021) when compared with the control group. No significant safety concerns were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive use of PEMF stimulation provides significant improvements in cervical spine fusion rates in subjects having risk factors for pseudarthrosis. When compared with control subjects that did not use PEMF stimulation, treated subjects showed improved fusion outcomes despite being older, having more risk factors for pseudarthrosis, and undergoing more complex surgeries.

Delayed fracture healing can have devastating functional consequences, including pseudoarthrosis. Many factors can contribute to delayed healing, including decreased vascularity, micro-motion at the fracture site, large fracture gaps, multiple traumas at the same site, compromised metabolic status, surgical complications, and other conditions. A 61-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with left distal humeral pseudarthrosis, accompanied by chronic pain and disability. Two years prior, the patient suffered a traumatic incident. At another medical facility, the patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery with simultaneous ulnar nerve transposition. She showed favorable postoperative recovery. Unfortunately, approximately one year later, the patient sustained a second trauma to the same arm. This led to peri-implant fracture and post-traumatic aseptic degradation of the osteosynthesis system which was subsequently removed. Twelve months after the last surgery, the patient was referred to our hospital and, after thorough consideration of the therapeutic options, we decided to perform left elbow arthroplasty with left distal humeral reconstruction by using Zimmer\'s Comprehensive Segmental Revision System. This approach is generally reserved for tumors, and only a handful of cases of megaprostheses for non-tumoral indications have been previously reported. The surgery and perioperative care of our patient were optimal, there were no complications, and the patient recovered arm functionality following rehabilitation.

Background: Among the risk factors for nonunion are unchangeable patient factors such as the type of injury and comorbidities, and factors that can be influenced by the surgeon such as fracture treatment and the postoperative course. While there are numerous studies analyzing unchangeable factors, there is poor evidence for factors that can be affected by the physician. This raises the need to fill the existing knowledge gaps and lay the foundations for future prevention and in-depth treatment strategies. Therefore, the goal of this study was to illuminate knowledge about nonunion in general and uncover the possible reasons for their development; Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 327 patients from 2015 to 2020 from a level I trauma center in Germany. Information about patient characteristics, comorbidities, alcohol and nicotine abuse, fracture classification, type of osteosynthesis, etc., was collected. Matched pair analysis was performed, and statistical testing performed specifically for atrophic long-bone nonunion; Results: The type of osteosynthesis significantly affected the development of nonunion, with plate osteosynthesis being a predictor for nonunion. The use of wire cerclage did not affect the development of nonunion, nor did the use of NSAIDs, smoking, alcohol, osteoporosis and BMI; Conclusion: Knowledge about predictors for nonunion and strategies to avoid them can benefit the medical care of patients, possibly preventing the development of nonunion.