BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ankle blood pressure measurements in relation to invasive blood pressure in the lateral position.
METHODS: This prospective observational study included adult patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia in the lateral position. Paired radial artery invasive and ankle noninvasive blood pressure readings were recorded in the lateral position using GE Carescape B650 monitor. The primary outcome was the ability of ankle mean arterial pressure (MAP) to detect hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. The secondary outcomes were the ability of ankle systolic blood pressure (SBP) to detect hypertension (SBP > 140 mmHg) as well as bias (invasive measurement - noninvasive measurement), and agreement between the two methods using the Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: We analyzed 415 paired readings from 30 patients. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of ankle MAP for detecting hypotension was 0.88 (0.83-0.93). An ankle MAP of ≤ 86 mmHg had negative and positive predictive values (95% CI) of 99 (97-100)% and 21 (15-29)%, respectively, for detecting hypotension. The AUC (95% CI) of ankle SBP to detect hypertension was 0.83 (0.79-0.86) with negative and positive predictive values (95% CI) of 95 (92-97)% and 36 (26-46)%, respectively, at a cutoff value of > 144 mmHg. The mean bias between the two methods was - 12 ± 17, 3 ± 12, and - 1 ± 11 mmHg for the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and MAP, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients under general anesthesia in the lateral position, ankle blood pressure measurements are not interchangeable with the corresponding invasive measurements. However, an ankle MAP > 86 mmHg can exclude hypotension with 99% accuracy, and an ankle SBP < 144 mmHg can exclude hypertension with 95% accuracy.

Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is a severe complication of hemodialysis (HD) with a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. In this study, we used a wearable device for the continuous monitoring of hemodynamic vitals to detect hemodynamic changes during HD and attempted to identify IDH. End-stage kidney disease patients were continuously monitored 15 min before starting the session and until 15 min after completion of the session, measuring heart rate (HR), noninvasive cuffless systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Data were analyzed retrospectively and included comparing BP measured by the wearable devices (recorded continuously every 5 s) and the cuff-based devices. A total of 98 dialysis sessions were included in the final analysis, and IDH was identified in 22 sessions (22.5%). Both SBP and DBP were highly correlated (r > 0.62, p < 0.001 for all) between the wearable device and the cuff-based measurements. Based on the continuous monitoring, patients with IDH had earlier and more profound reductions in SBP and DBP during the HD treatment. In addition, nearly all of the advanced vitals differed between groups. Further studies should be conducted in order to fully understand the potential of noninvasive advanced continuous monitoring in the prediction and prevention of IDH events.

Continuous, noninvasive blood pressure (CNIBP) monitoring provides valuable hemodynamic information that renders detection of the early onset of cardiovascular diseases. Wearable mechano-electric pressure sensors that mount on the skin are promising candidates for monitoring continuous blood pressure (BP) pulse waveforms due to their excellent conformability, simple sensing mechanisms, and convenient signal acquisition. However, it is challenging to acquire high-fidelity BP pulse waveforms since it requires highly sensitive sensors (sensitivity larger than 4 × 10-5 kPa-1 ) that respond linearly with pressure change over a large dynamic range, covering the typical BP range (5-25 kPa). Herein, this work introduces a high-fidelity, iontronic-based tonometric sensor (ITS) with high sensitivity (4.82 kPa-1 ), good linearity (R2 > 0.995), and a large dynamic range (up to 180% output change) over a broad working range (0 to 38 kPa). Additionally, the ITS demonstrates a low limit of detection at 40 Pa, a fast load response time (35 ms) and release time (35 ms), as well as a stable response over 5000 load per release cycles, paving ways for potential applications in human-interface interaction, electronic skins, and robotic haptics. This work further explores the application of the ITS in monitoring real-time, beat-to-beat BP by measuring the brachial and radial pulse waveforms. This work provides a rational design of a wearable pressure sensor with high sensitivity, good linearity, and a large dynamic range for real-time CNIBP monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement of two noninvasive blood pressure devices: a human device with the cuff placed on the wrist (Omron R1) and a veterinary device with the cuff placed on the upper brachium (Surgivet Advisor Vital Signs Monitor) with invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurement in anaesthetized chimpanzees.
METHODS: Prospective clinical study.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 11 adult chimpanzees undergoing anaesthesia for translocation and routine health checks.
METHODS: Systolic (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressures (DAP) were continuously recorded via a transducer connected to a femoral artery cannula, and at 5 minute intervals from the two oscillometric devices. Agreement was explored using Bland-Altman analysis and bias defined as the mean difference between the two measurement methods. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Bias and standard deviation for the Surgivet compared with IBP were 8.6 ± 18 for SAP and 8.4 ± 9.9 for DAP, showing a significant underestimation of both variables. Limits of agreement (LOA) were from -27 to 44 for SAP and from -11 to 28 for DAP. Correlation coefficients between the Surgivet and IBP values were 0.86 for SAP and 0.85 for DAP (p < 0.0001). Bias and standard deviation for the Omron compared with the IBP were -21 ± 25 for SAP and -18 ± 15 for DAP, showing a significant overestimation of both variables. LOA were from -70 to -28 for SAP and from -47 to 11 for DAP. Spearman correlation coefficients between the Omron and IBP values were 0.64 for SAP and 0.72 for DAP (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although neither device met all the criteria for device validation, the Surgivet presented better agreement with IBP values than the Omron in adult anaesthetized chimpanzees.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the agreement between an oscillometric device and invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements in anesthetized healthy adult guinea pigs.
METHODS: Prospective experimental study.
METHODS: A total of eight adult Hartley guinea pigs.
METHODS: All animals were anesthetized; a carotid artery was surgically exposed and catheterized for IBP measurements. A size 1 cuff placed on the right thoracic limb was connected to an oscillometric device for noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) assessment. Concurrent pairs of systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures were recorded simultaneously with both methods every 3 minutes for 30 minutes. Agreement between IBP and NIBP measurements was determined using the Bland-Altman method, considering the recommended standards for the validation of NIBP measurement devices proposed by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM).
RESULTS: The bias and the 95% limits of agreement were: -14 (-31 to 3) mmHg, -2 (-14 to 10) mmHg and -1 (-13 to 11) mmHg for SAP, DAP and MAP, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The oscillometric device used in this study to measure NIBP did not meet ACVIM criteria for validation. It showed good agreement for DAP and MAP but not for SAP measurements. Considering the small size of these animals and the resulting difficulty in performing percutaneous arterial catheterization, this device might be a useful tool to assess MAP and DAP during anesthetic procedures in adult guinea pigs.

Invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) and noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements are both common methods. Recently, a new method of error grid analysis was proposed to compare blood pressure obtained using two measurement methods. This study aimed to compare IAP and NIBP measurements using the error grid analysis and investigate potential confounding factors affecting the discrepancies between IAP and NIBP.
Adult patients who underwent general anesthesia in the supine position with both IAP and NIBP measurements were retrospectively investigated. The error grid analyses were performed to compare IAP and NIBP. In the error grid analysis, the clinical relevance of the discrepancies between IAP and NIBP was evaluated and classified into five zones from no risk (A) to dangerous risk (E).
Overall, data of 1934 IAP/NIBP measurement pairs from 100 patients were collected. The error grid analysis revealed that the proportions of zones A-E for systolic blood pressure were 96.4%, 3.5%, 0.05%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. In contrast, the proportions for mean blood pressure were 82.5%, 16.7%, 0.8%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. The multiple regression analysis revealed that continuous phenylephrine administration (p = 0.016) and age (p = 0.044) were the significant factors of an increased clinical risk of the differences in mean blood pressure.
The error grid analysis indicated that the differences between IAP and NIBP for mean blood pressure were not clinically acceptable and had the risk of leading to unnecessary treatments. Continuous phenylephrine administration and age were the significant factors of an increased clinical risk of the discrepancies between IAP and NIBP.

The purpose of this study was to determine the level of agreement between invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in anesthetized, non-surgically manipulated Dorset cross-bred lambs. Twelve healthy female Dorset cross-bred lambs, weighing 37.3 ± 7.4 kg (mean ± SD) underwent isoflurane anesthesia for simultaneous measurement of systolic arterial pressure (SAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) from an invasive blood pressure source and a noninvasive oscillometric source (O-NIBP). The femoral artery was catheterized for invasive blood pressure measurements, while noninvasive blood pressure was measured from a cuff placed on the antebrachium. The Bland-Altman method was used to calculate agreement between SAP, MAP and DAP measurements. The bias ± SD between SAP, MAP and DAP measurements was 3.6 ± 12.0, 4.9 ± 9.1 mmHg and 4.1 ± 8.0, respectively. The 95% limits of agreement for SAP, MAP and DAP were - 19.9 to 27.1, -13.0 to 22.8 mmHg, and - 11.7 to 19.9, respectively. Overall, agreement was poor between femoral IBP and O-NIBP monitoring techniques in anesthetized Dorset cross-bred lambs, with O-NIBP underestimating the femoral IBP. Arterial blood pressure should be most accurately measured using an invasive blood pressure monitoring technique in lambs undergoing isoflurane anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess agreement between oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements using LifeWindow monitors (LW9xVet and LW6000V) and invasive blood pressure (IBP). To assess the agreement of NIBP readings using a ratio of cuff width to mid-cannon circumference of 25% and 40%.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized clinical study.
METHODS: A total of 43 adult horses undergoing general anesthesia in dorsal recumbency for different procedures.
METHODS: Anesthetic protocols varied according to clinician preference. IBP measurement was achieved after cannulation of the facial artery and connection to an appropriately positioned transducer connected to one of two LifeWindow multiparameter monitors (models: LW6000V and LW9xVet). Accuracy of monitors was checked daily using a mercury manometer. For each horse, NIBP was measured with two cuff widths (corresponding to 25% or 40% of mid-cannon bone circumference), both connected to the same monitor, and six paired IBP/NIBP readings were recorded (at least 3 minutes between readings). NIBP values were corrected to the relative level of the xiphoid process. A Bland-Altman analysis for repeated measures was used to assess bias (NIBP-IBP) and limits of agreement (LOAs).
RESULTS: The 40% cuff width systolic arterial pressure [SAP; bias 7.9 mmHg, LOA -26.6 to 42.3; mean arterial pressure (MAP): bias 4.9 mmHg, LOA -28.2 to 38.0; diastolic arterial pressure (DAP): bias 4.2 mmHg, LOA -31.4 to 39.7)] performed better than the 25% cuff width (SAP: bias 26.4 mmHg, LOA -21.0 to 73.9; MAP: bias 15.7 mmHg, LOA -23.8 to 55.2; DAP: bias 10.9 mmHg, LOA -33.2 to 54.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Using the LifeWindow multiparameter monitor in anesthetized horses, the 40% cuff width provided better agreement with IBP; however, both cuff sizes and both monitor models failed to meet American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Consensus Statement Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a veterinary-specific oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) system according to the guidelines of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) Consensus Statement.
METHODS: Prospective clinical study.
METHODS: A total of 33 client-owned cats (20 females and 13 males).
METHODS: Cats were premedicated with methadone (0.3 mg kg-1) and alfaxalone (2 mg kg-1) intramuscularly. After 15 minutes anesthesia was induced with isoflurane (3%) in 100% oxygen by facemask while breathing spontaneously. A 22 gauge catheter was placed in the median caudal artery and systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressures were measured. NIBP measurements were collected by placing the cuff (40% of limb circumference) on the right or left antebrachium. The agreement between the two methods was evaluated with the Bland-Altman methods, and the oscillometric NIBP device was evaluated using the ACVIM guidelines for validation of devices.
RESULTS: Data from 30 of the 33 cats were analyzed. Five paired measurements were taken from each cat, totaling 150 paired measurements. Mean bias (limits of agreements) for SAP, DAP and MAP were 2.7 (-22.7 to 28.1), 0.9 (-22.3 to 24.2) and 1.3 (-20.4 to 23.0). The oscillometric NIBP passed all validation criteria, except correlation which was <0.9 for SAP, DAP and MAP.
CONCLUSIONS: The Vet20 did not meet all validation criteria by the ACVIM. However, all criteria except correlation were met.

Hypotension during general anesthesia is associated with poor outcome. Continuous monitoring of mean blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia is useful and needs to be reliable and minimally invasive. Conventional cuff measurements can lead to delays due to its discontinuous nature. It has been shown that there is a relationship between MAP and photoplethysmography (PPG) parameters like the dicrotic notch and perfusion index (PI). The objective of the study was to continuously estimate MAP from PPG. Pulse wave analysis based on PPG was implemented using either notch relative amplitude (MAPNRA), notch absolute amplitude (MAPNAA) or PI (MAPPI) to estimate MAP from PPG waveform features during general anesthesia. Estimated MAP values were compared to brachial cuff MAP (MAPcuff) and to radial invasive MAP (MAPinv). Forty-six patients were analyzed for a total of 235 h. Compared to MAPcuff, mean bias and limits of agreement were 1 mmHg (- 26 to +29), - 1 mmHg (- 10 to +8) and - 3 mmHg (- 21 to +13) for MAPNRA, MAPNAA and MAPPI respectively. Compared to MAPinv, mean absolute error (MAE) was 20 mmHg [10 to 39], 11 mmHg [5 to 18] and 16 mmHg [9 to 24] for MAP derived from MAPNRA, MAPNAA and MAPPI respectively. When calibrated every 5 min, MAPNAA showed a MAE of 6 mmHg [5 to 9]. MAPNAA provides the best estimates with respect to brachial cuff MAP and invasive MAP. Regular calibration allows to reduce drift over time. Beat to beat estimation of MAP during general anesthesia from the PPG appears possible with an acceptable average error.