BACKGROUND: This study analysed changes in gait and pedobarography and subjective and functional outcomes after isolated Chopart joint injury.
METHODS: The results of 14 patients were reviewed. Kinematic 3D gait analysis, comparative bilateral electromyography (EMG) and pedobarography were performed.
RESULTS: On the injured side, the 3D gait analysis showed a significantly increased internal rotation and decreased external rotation of the hip and significantly decreased adduction and decreased range of motion (ROM) for the ankle. On the healthy side, the pedobarography revealed a significantly increased mean force in the forefoot, an increased peak maximum force and an increased maximum pressure in the metatarsal. When standing, significantly more weight was placed on the healthy side. The EMG measurements showed no significant differences between the healthy and injured legs.
CONCLUSIONS: After isolated Chopart injuries, significant changes in gait and pedobarography can be seen over the long term.

Diffuse tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT), previously known as pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS), is a benign, aggressive, and distracting proliferative synovial lesion. D-TGCT is commonly seen in large joints such as the knee and hip. We present the case of a 57-year-old female who initially presented with swelling on the left midfoot that increased over four years. Clinically, a ganglion was suspected on the left midfoot and an MRI showed a heterogeneous lobulated soft tissue mass on the superior aspect of the tarsal midfoot measuring 5.8 x 2.4 x 4.2 cm. The mass causing remodeling and bony erosion was more appreciated at the medial aspect of the talus bone and extended to the sinus tarsi and talocalcaneal joint space. Surgical excision of the mass was performed, and pathology reports found lobulated soft tissue lesions composed of mononuclear cells, multinucleated giant cells, sheets of foamy macrophages, inflammatory cells, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. This case represents D-TGCT without atypia or malignancy based on the findings.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to quantify the articular surfaces of the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint to help clinicians better understand common pathologies observed such as navicular stress fractures and arthrodesis nonunions.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty cadaver NC joints were dissected and the articular cartilage of the navicular, medial, middle, and lateral cuneiforms were quantified by calibrated digital imaging software. Statistical analysis included calculating the mean cartilage surface area dimensions of the distal navicular and proximal cuneiform bones. Length measurements on the navicular were obtained to estimate the geographic location of the interfacet ridges. Lastly, all facets of the articular surfaces were described in regard to the shape and location of cartilaginous or fibrous components. Results were compared using Student t tests.
UNASSIGNED: Navicular cartilage was present over 75.4% of the surface area of the proximal NC joint, compared with 72.6% of combined cuneiform cartilage distally. The mean height of the deepest (dorsal-plantar) measurement of navicular articular cartilage was 18 ± 3 mm. The mean heights of the distal medial, middle, and lateral cuneiform articular facets were 15 ± 1 mm, 17 ± 2 mm, and 15 ± 2 mm, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: There is significant variation among the articular surfaces of the NC joint. Additionally, the central third of the navicular was calculated to lie in the inter-facet ridge between the medial and middle articular facets of the navicular.
UNASSIGNED: Surgeons may consider this study data when performing joint preparation for NC arthrodesis as cartilage was present to a mean depth of 18 mm at the NC joint. Additionally, this study demonstrates that the central third of the navicular, where most navicular stress fractures occur, lies in the interfacet ridge between the medial and middle articular facets of the navicular.

Charcot neuroarthropathy is a progressive, destructive condition leading to deformity, dysfunction and, in some cases, amputation. Much evolution has occurred over the last couple of decades in the management of Charcot foot with a focus on developing limb salvage and reconstructive techniques. The aim has been to achieve a stable plantigrade foot that remains pain and ulcer-free whilst reducing amputation rates. Soft tissue and bony reconstructions have been explored, and various modalities of fixation, including internal, external, and combined techniques, have been described and their outcomes published. Currently, no strong evidence exists which supports a particular modality of treatment, nor have there been any randomised studies to this effect, but the results are nevertheless promising. Recent studies have reported on minimally invasive techniques, the use of super construct fixation, computer-navigated deformity correction, the efficacy of techniques such as subtalar arthrodesis or tendon balancing procedures and staged deformity corrections. There is a need for more controlled and comparative studies with consistent reporting of intended outcomes to create a stronger portfolio of evidence on the surgical management of Charcot foot.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the radiographic diagnostic criteria and propose standardised radiographic criteria for Lisfranc injuries.
METHODS: A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The various radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries were extracted. Descriptive statistics were presented for all continuous (as mean ± standard deviation) and categorical variables (as frequencies by percentages).
RESULTS: The literature search included 29 studies that totalled 1115 Lisfranc injuries. The risk of bias ranged from \"Low\" to \"Moderate\" risk according to the ROBINS-I tool. The overall recommendations according to the GRADE assessment ranged from \"Very Low\" to \"High\". 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis was the most common of the 12 various radiographic diagnostic criteria observed, as was employed in 18 studies. This was followed by 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation, as was employed in 11 studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic diagnostic criteria of Lisfranc injuries were heterogeneous. The proposition for homogenous radiographic diagnostic criteria is that the following features must be observed for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries: 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis of ≥ 2 mm on anteroposterior view or 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation on anteroposterior or oblique views. Further advanced imaging by CT or MRI may be required in patients with normal radiographs but with continued suspicion for Lisfranc injuries.
METHODS: 4, systematic review.

This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). Key databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 23 February 2023. All trials investigating non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA were included. Quality assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Outcomes were pain, function, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Effects (mean differences, standardised mean differences, risk ratios) were calculated where possible for the short (0 to 12 weeks), medium (> 12 to 52 weeks), and long (> 52 weeks) term. Six trials (231 participants) were included (one feasibility trial and five case series) - all were judged to be of poor methodological quality. Two trials reported arch contouring foot orthoses to exert no-to-large effects on pain in the short and medium term, and small-to-very-large effects on function in the short and medium term. Two trials reported shoe stiffening inserts to exert medium-to-huge effects on pain in the short term, and small effects on function in the short term. Two trials of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injections reported favourable effects on pain in the short term, small effects on pain and function in the medium term, and minimal long term effects. Two trials reported minor adverse events, and none reported health-related quality of life outcomes. The current evidence suggests that arch contouring foot orthoses, shoe stiffening inserts and corticosteroid injections may be effective for midfoot OA. Rigorous randomised trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA.

UNASSIGNED: Charcot arthropathy is a condition which is progressive, non-infectious, destructive and debilitating that commonly affect foot and ankle. This systematic review is to evaluate the occurrence of common outcomes associated with each intervention of Charcot neuroarthropathy in midfoot.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review on literatures that were published from Jan 2010 to Jan 2020 were collected, reviewed and selected regarding the surgical treatment procedures of Charcot neuroarthropathy in midfoot.
UNASSIGNED: The initial search yielded 231 reports and after exclusion, nine out of the total studies were included in the outcome analysis for review. These were studies that included data concerning surgical reconstruction of Charcot arthropathy in the midfoot.
UNASSIGNED: It is suggested that soft tissue preparation and usage of combination of implants thus reduce the risk of infection as well as increase rigidity of construct, respectively. These factors will aid to improve outcome of midfoot Charcot arthropathy reconstruction.

UNASSIGNED: Athletes sustaining Lisfranc joint instability after a low-energy injury often undergo surgical fixation. Limited studies report validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for this specific patient population. Our purpose was to report PROMs of athletes experiencing instability after a low-energy Lisfranc injury and undergoing surgical fixation.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-nine athletes (23 competitive, 6 recreational) sustained an unstable Lisfranc injury (14 acute, 15 chronic) and met our inclusion criteria. Injuries were classified as acute if surgically managed within 6 weeks. All athletes completed validated PROMs pre- and postoperatively. The cohort underwent various open reduction internal fixation methods. We evaluated outcomes with the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) activities of daily living (ADL) and sports subscales.
UNASSIGNED: Fourteen of 29 (48%) athletes reported PROMs at ≥2 years with a median follow-up time of 44.5 months. Substantial improvement for both FAAM ADL (50% vs 93%; P < .001) and sports (14.1% vs 80%; P = .002) subscales were found, when comparing preoperative to postoperative scores at ≥2 years.
UNASSIGNED: This study provides outcomes information for the young athletic population that were treated operatively for low-energy Lisfranc injury with apparent joint instability. Based on the FAAM sports subscale, these patients on average improved between their 6-month evaluation and their final ≥2 years but still scored 80% of the possible 100%, which indicates continued but \"slight\" difficulty with lower extremity function.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV, case series.

Ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot osteoarthritis (OA) is most commonly posttraumatic and tends to become symptomatic in younger patients. It often results from instability due to insufficiency of supportive soft tissue structures, such as ligaments and tendons. Diagnostic imaging can be helpful to detect and characterize the distribution of OA, and to assess the integrity of these supportive structures, which helps determine prognosis and guide treatment. However, the imaging findings associated with OA and instability may be subtle and unrecognized until the process is advanced, which may ultimately limit therapeutic options to salvage procedures. It is important to understand the abilities and limitations of various imaging modalities used to assess ankle, hindfoot, and midfoot OA, and to be familiar with the imaging findings of OA and instability patterns.

BACKGROUND: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a newly developed patient-reported outcome that has been validated for the general foot and ankle population and has been applied to a variety of specific foot and ankle procedures. However, there is little data regarding clinical outcomes of patients at a more intermediate subgroup level. Thus, our study utilized PROMIS to provide normative data on pathologic conditions of the foot and ankle and assess postoperative outcomes based on anatomical location.
METHODS: Preoperative and 1-year postoperative PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) surveys were prospectively collected from a cohort of patients undergoing a foot and ankle procedure at a tertiary medical center. The cohort was split into forefoot (n = 136), midfoot (n = 44), hindfoot (n = 109), and Achilles (n = 62) procedure groups. Paired-t tests were used to compare preoperative versus postoperative outcomes within operative groups, while a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect differences in PROMIS scores between anatomic subgroups.
RESULTS: Paired t tests indicated that all 4 operative groups had significantly improved PROMIS PF and PI scores preoperatively versus 1 year postoperatively (all P < .001). One-way ANOVA demonstrated that there were no differences in postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores between anatomic subgroups. A majority of patients achieved the minimal clinically important difference level of improvement in PROMIS PF and PI scores following surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: All 4 operative groups had improvement in physical function and pain outcomes. Additionally, there were no differences in physical function and pain outcomes between operative groups.
METHODS: Level III, retrospective cohort study.