The mock circulatory loop (MCL) is an in vitro experimental system that can provide continuous pulsatile flows and simulate different physiological or pathological parameters of the human circulation system. It is of great significance for testing cardiovascular assist device (CAD), which is a type of clinical instrument used to treat cardiovascular disease and alleviate the dilemma of insufficient donor hearts. The MCL installed with different types of CADs can simulate specific conditions of clinical surgery for evaluating the effectiveness and reliability of those CADs under the repeated performance tests and reliability tests. Also, patient-specific cardiovascular models can be employed in the circulation of MCL for targeted pathological study associated with hemodynamics. Therefore, The MCL system has various combinations of different functional units according to its richful applications, which are comprehensively reviewed in the current work. Four types of CADs including prosthetic heart valve (PHV), ventricular assist device (VAD), total artificial heart (TAH) and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) applied in MCL experiments are documented and compared in detail. Moreover, MCLs with more complicated structures for achieving advanced functions are further introduced, such as MCL for the pediatric application, MCL with anatomical phantoms and MCL synchronizing multiple circulation systems. By reviewing the constructions and functions of available MCLs, the features of MCLs for different applications are summarized, and directions of developing the MCLs are suggested.

COVID-19-associated myocarditis can be a lethal complication in previous variants, but it is not well understood in the Omicron variant. We present an unvaccinated case of COVID-19-associated fulminant myocarditis due to the Omicron BA.2 sub-lineage requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A 66-year-old female without vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was hospitalized due to COVID-19. On the next day, she was transferred to our hospital due to the development of fulminant myocarditis. After arrival, she was treated with Impella CP and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to unstable hemodynamics. In addition to MCS, we treated her with inotropes, methylprednisolone, tocilizumab, and remdesivir. Left ventricular contraction gradually improved, and MCS was removed on day 8. Endomyocardial biopsy showed mild interstitial infiltration of CD3+-T lymphocytes and CD68+-macrophages with no remarkable necrosis or fibrosis. This case showed similar histological characteristics to COVID-19-associated myocarditis before the Omicron variant. The vaccination against the Omicron variant should be considered to prevent the development of severe illness, including fulminant myocarditis.
UNASSIGNED: Although the Omicron variant is thought to be generally less severe, COVID-19-associated fulminant myocarditis, as in this case, can occur. The vaccination against the Omicron variant should be considered to prevent from developing severe illness.

The management of refractory electrical storm (ES) requiring mechanical circulation support (MCS) remains a clinical challenge in structural heart disease (SHD).
The study sought to explore the 30-day and 1-year outcome of rescue ablation for refractory ES requiring MCS in SHD.
A total of 81 patients (mean age: 55.3 ± 18.9, 73 men [90.1%]) undergoing ablation were investigated, including 26 patients with ES requiring MCS (group 1) and 55 patients without (group 2). The 30-day and 1-year outcome, including mortality and recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VAs) receiving appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillators therapies, were assessed.
The patients in group 1 were characterized by older age, more ischemic cardiomyopathies, worse left ventricular ejection fraction, and more comorbidities. Thirty days after ablation, overall events were seen in 15 patients (mortality in 10 and recurrent VA in 7), including pumping failure-related mortality in 6 (60%). During a 30-day follow-up, higher mortality was noted in group 1. After a 1-year follow-up, in spite of the higher mortality in group 1 (P < .001), the overall events and VA recurrences were similar between these two groups (P = .154 and P = .466, respectively). There was a significant reduction of VA burden in both groups and two patients had recurrent ES.
Higher 30-day mortality was observed in patients undergoing rescue ablation for refractory ES requiring MCS, and pumping failure was the major cause of periprocedural death. Rescue ablation successfully prevented VA recurrences and resulted in a comparable 1-year prognosis between ES with and without MCS.